Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 60 references

TPB-coated wavelength-shifting fibers collect about 1% of noble-gas scintillation light at high pressure.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 11:06 UTC pith:DUCW5VA7

load-bearing objection Solid instrumentation paper that delivers the first quantitative ~1% LCE numbers for TPB-coated WLS fibers in high-pressure Xe/Ar, with a clean dual-setup cross-check; useful engineering data for NEXT, not a physics breakthrough.

arxiv 2607.04944 v1 pith:DUCW5VA7 submitted 2026-07-06 physics.ins-det hep-ex

Detection of scintillation light in noble gases with wavelength-shifting optical fibers

S.R. Soleti , S. Torelli , G. Mart\'inez-Lema , H. Almaz\'an , A. Beck , A. Castillo , M. del Barrio-Torregrosa , P. Dietz
show 105 more authors
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-det hep-ex
keywords wavelength-shifting fibersTPBscintillation lightgaseous xenongaseous argonlight collection efficiencyhigh-pressure TPCSiPM readout
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Noble-gas detectors emit scintillation light deep in the vacuum ultraviolet, where ordinary sensors are blind. This paper shows that optical fibers coated with the wavelength shifter TPB can turn that light into visible wavelengths and deliver it to a small number of photosensors with a measured collection efficiency near one percent in both gaseous xenon and argon up to 8.5 bar. Two independent prototypes—one read out by cooled silicon photomultipliers and one by photomultiplier tubes—agree once sensor quantum efficiency is taken into account. The same data also recover the known energy cost of making a scintillation photon under low-recombination conditions. Because the fibers can line the barrel of a large high-pressure TPC and feed only a few hundred cooled sensors, the result offers a practical route to low-background, low-channel-count scintillation readout for next-generation rare-event experiments.

Core claim

TPB-coated wavelength-shifting fibers collect 1.18% of the scintillation photons produced by alphas in high-pressure xenon and 1.07% in argon; an independent PMT-based measurement scales to the same value after photon-detection-efficiency correction, establishing that the fiber system works reliably as a light-collection technology for gaseous noble detectors.

What carries the argument

Light-collection efficiency (LCE), defined as the fraction of primary scintillation photons that produce a photoelectron after wavelength shifting, fiber transport and sensor detection, extracted from alpha peaks after dark-noise subtraction and Geant4 correction for geometric absorption.

Load-bearing premise

The absolute number of scintillation photons produced by each alpha is taken from an external pressure-dependent yield table; any systematic error in that table moves the reported collection efficiency by the same fraction.

What would settle it

Repeat the alpha measurement with an independent absolute light-yield calibration (for example a well-characterized VUV photodiode or a field-on TPC geometry) and check whether the extracted LCE remains consistent with 1%.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental measurements of light-collection efficiency (LCE) for TPB-coated wavelength-shifting optical fibers in high-pressure gaseous xenon and argon (up to 8.5 bar). Two complementary zero-field prototypes are used: an elongated PTFE-lined vessel with Y11 fibers read by temperature-stabilized SiPMs, and a compact box with BCF-91A fibers read by red-enhanced PMTs, both under continuous purification. Alpha particles from 241Am provide the primary LCE determination via Eq. (1), after SPE calibration, dark-noise subtraction, and Geant4 corrections for source-disk and endcap absorption; the SiPM results are LCE_Xe = 1.18 ± 0.01 (sta.) +0.07/-0.09 (sys.) % and LCE_Ar = 1.07 ± 0.01 (sta.) +0.06/-0.08 (sys.) %. The independent PMT measurement at 1 bar (0.45 %) scales into agreement after PDE correction. Cosmic-muon data yield a pressure-independent light yield that converts, with the measured LCE, to w_sc = 45 ± 7 (sta.) +4/-5 (sys.) eV at 1.5 bar, consistent with literature under low-recombination conditions. Average waveforms are fitted to extract prompt, triplet, and recombination time components. The authors conclude that such fiber systems are a viable, low-channel-count option for S1 readout in future high-pressure Xe TPCs, with the reported LCE an upper limit for a full-scale detector.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete, cross-checked experimental benchmark for TPB-coated WLS-fiber scintillation readout in high-pressure noble gases, directly relevant to the design of NEXT-HD and similar tonne-scale HPGXe-TPCs. The dual-setup agreement (SiPM vs. PMT after PDE scaling), pressure-independent LCE, SPE calibration at every temperature, continuous purification, and explicit framing of the LCE as an upper limit for a realistic TPC with grids and long fibers constitute a solid feasibility demonstration. The cosmic-muon extraction of w_sc that matches published low-recombination values further strengthens the absolute scale. The paper therefore advances a practical alternative to PMT-based S1 systems that reduces radiogenic background and mechanical complexity while remaining compatible with high-pressure operation.

minor comments (5)
  1. Section 4.1 / Eq. (1): the absolute scale of LCE inherits the systematic uncertainty of the Saito et al. (2003) N_γ table. While this does not reverse the feasibility conclusion (the PMT cross-check and w_sc comparison survive a uniform rescaling), a short explicit statement of that external-scale dependence would improve transparency.
  2. Section 4.5: the effective exponential approximation used for the recombination tail (and the noted correlation that pulls the Ar triplet lifetime low relative to literature) should be flagged more clearly as a fit convenience rather than a physical claim.
  3. Figure 10 and Table 1: the pressure dependence of ε_abs is shown, but a one-sentence reminder that the reported LCE is defined only for photons directed toward the fibers (not a full 4π collection efficiency) would help non-specialist readers.
  4. Section 4.2: the discussion of why BCF-91A fibers remain competitive despite lower quoted trapping efficiency and spectral overlap is useful; quantifying the optical-coupling difference more tightly (or noting it as an unmeasured residual) would tighten the comparison.
  5. Minor typographical/consistency items: “Gatekeeper®” vs. SAES model numbers, occasional missing spaces around units, and the arXiv date stamp (2026) should be cleaned in production.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: LCE is a direct experimental ratio using external absolute yield and geometry MC; w_sc is an independent consistency check.

full rationale

The central result is the measured light-collection efficiency defined by Eq. (1): LCE = (N_p.e. − N_DCR)/(N_γ · ε_abs). N_p.e. and N_DCR are obtained from the present SiPM (or PMT) waveforms; N_γ is taken from the external absolute alpha-yield tables of Saito et al. (IEEE TNS 50, 2452, 2003); ε_abs is a Geant4 geometry factor. Nothing in this ratio is defined in terms of the reported LCE itself, nor is any free parameter fitted to force the LCE value. The independent PMT setup (different fiber brand, different photosensors) yields a PDE-scaled LCE that agrees within uncertainties, providing an external cross-check. The subsequent extraction of w_sc = LCE / LY_muon (Eq. 6) simply converts the separately measured muon light yield into energy-per-photon units; the numerical agreement with literature values under low-recombination conditions is a consistency test, not a circular re-use of the same data. A back-of-the-envelope product of literature trapping, TPB, spectral-overlap and PDE factors also lands at the percent level without reference to the measured spectra. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation uniqueness claim, or renamed known result appears in the derivation chain. The paper is a self-contained experimental characterization against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central LCE numbers rest on three external inputs (absolute alpha yield table, PTFE/SS optical constants, SiPM PDE curves) plus standard SPE calibration. No new physical entities are postulated; free parameters are limited to ordinary fit nuisance parameters that cancel in the final ratio.

free parameters (2)
  • SiPM single-photoelectron gain (per channel, per temperature)
    Extracted from multi-Gaussian fits to dark-pulse spectra; 3.6% relative uncertainty is propagated as systematic but is measured, not freely chosen to force LCE.
  • Crystal Ball peak position for alpha charge spectra
    N_p.e. is obtained by fitting each pressure point; the functional form is conventional and the peak is visually unambiguous.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Absolute scintillation photon yield N_γ(P) for 5.49 MeV alphas in Xe and Ar is given by the pressure-dependent values of Saito et al. (2003).
    Used directly in eq. (1) to convert measured photo-electrons into LCE; no independent absolute measurement is performed in this work.
  • domain assumption Stainless-steel source disk is fully absorbing in the VUV and PTFE end-cap reflectivity follows the wavelength-dependent values of Silva et al. (2010).
    These optical constants enter the Geant4 evaluation of ε_abs; the dominant systematic is obtained by varying them.
  • domain assumption Photon detection efficiency of the S13360-6075PE SiPM averaged over the Y11 emission spectrum is 46%.
    Taken from manufacturer data sheet and used both for back-of-envelope estimate and for scaling the PMT result.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 30215 in / 2690 out tokens · 30874 ms · 2026-07-11T11:06:53.202679+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Wavelength-shifting (WLS) techniques enable particle detectors based on noble gases, whose scintillation light is predominantly emitted in the vacuum-ultraviolet. We investigate WLS fibers coated with tetraphenyl butadiene (TPB) for scintillation light detection in gaseous xenon and argon at pressures up to 8.5 bar, motivated by future high-pressure xenon time-projection chambers of the NEXT program. Two detector configurations are studied: an elongated high-pressure vessel with four PTFE panels equipped with WLS fibers read by temperature-stabilized SiPMs, and a compact box-shaped detector operated at 1 bar Xe with WLS fibers read out by PMTs. Both operate with continuous gas purification. The detector response is characterized using cosmic muons and alpha particles from a $^{241}$Am source. With the SiPM setup, we measure a light collection efficiency (LCE) of ${1.18 \pm 0.01~\mathrm{(sta.)}~^{+0.07}_{-0.09}~\mathrm{(sys.)}~\%}$ for xenon and ${1.07 \pm 0.01~\mathrm{(sta.)}~^{+0.06}_{-0.08}~\mathrm{(sys.)}~\%}$ for argon. With PMT readout, we measure a LCE of ${0.45 \pm 0.01~\mathrm{(sta.)} \pm 0.05~\mathrm{(sys.)}~\%}$ in xenon, in agreement with the SiPM result once photon detection efficiency is accounted for. Average scintillation waveforms in xenon and argon are studied to assess the time structure of the emitted light. Cosmic-muon measurements yield a mean energy required to produce a scintillation photon $45\pm7~\mathrm{(sta.)}~^{+4}_{-5}~\mathrm{(sys.)}~\mathrm{eV}$ at 1.5 bar, in agreement with the literature. The results demonstrate that TPB-coated WLS fiber systems can reliably detect scintillation light in high-pressure gaseous noble detectors, with a LCE representing an upper limit for realistic large-scale TPCs, where additional photon losses from materials and fiber attenuation are expected.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume I Introduction to DUNE.JINST, 15(08):T08008, 2020.arXiv:2002.02967,doi:10

    Babak Abi et al. Deep Underground Neutrino Ex- periment (DUNE), Far Detector Technical Design Report, Volume I Introduction to DUNE.JINST, 15(08):T08008, 2020.arXiv:2002.02967,doi:10. 1088/1748-0221/15/08/T08008

  2. [2]

    A. Sim´ on. GanESS: detecting coherent elas- tic neutrino-nucleus scattering with noble gases. JINST, 19(04):C04041, 2024.doi:10.1088/ 1748-0221/19/04/C04041

  3. [3]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Ex- periment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(4):041003, 2023. arXiv:2303.14729,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 131.041003

  4. [4]

    Aalbers et al

    J. Aalbers et al. First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131(4):041002, 2023.arXiv:2207. 03764,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.041002

  5. [5]

    J. B. Albert et al. Search for Majorana neutri- nos with the first two years of EXO-200 data.Na- ture, 510:229–234, 2014.arXiv:1402.6956,doi: 10.1038/nature13432

  6. [6]

    Novella et al

    P. Novella et al. Demonstration of neutrinoless double beta decay searches in gaseous xenon with NEXT.JHEP, 09:190, 2023.arXiv:2305.09435, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2023)190. 17

  7. [7]

    P´ erez Maneiro et al

    M. P´ erez Maneiro et al. Demonstration of Sub- Percent Energy Resolution in the NEXT-100 De- tector. 11 2025.arXiv:2511.02467

  8. [8]

    Kekic et al

    M. Kekic et al. Demonstration of background re- jection using deep convolutional neural networks in the NEXT experiment.JHEP, 01:189, 2021. arXiv:2009.10783,doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2021) 189

  9. [9]

    Adams et al

    C. Adams et al. The NEXT-100 Detector.Eur. Phys. J. C, 86(2):114, 2026.arXiv:2505.17848, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14951-y

  10. [10]

    Adams et al

    C. Adams et al. Sensitivity of a tonne-scale NEXT detector for neutrinoless double beta de- cay searches.JHEP, 2021(08):164, 2021.arXiv: 2005.06467,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)164

  11. [11]

    C. E. Aalseth et al. DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two- phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133:131, 2018.arXiv: 1707.08145,doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-11973-4

  12. [12]

    Reflectance and fluorescence characteristics of PTFE coated with TPB at visible, UV, and VUV as a function of thickness

    J. Haefner et al. Reflectance and fluorescence characteristics of PTFE coated with TPB at vis- ible, UV, and VUV as a function of thickness. JINST, 18(03):P03016, 2023.arXiv:2211.05024, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/18/03/P03016

  13. [13]

    Adhikari et al

    G. Adhikari et al. nEXO: neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 10 28 year half-life sen- sitivity.J. Phys. G, 49(1):015104, 2022.arXiv: 2106.16243,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac3631

  14. [14]

    Hawley-Herrera et al

    H. Hawley-Herrera et al. Batch VUV4 characteriza- tion for the SBC-LAr10 scintillating bubble cham- ber.JINST, 19(08):T08003, 2024.arXiv:2405. 18403,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/T08003

  15. [15]

    A. A. Machado and E. Segreto. ARAPUCA a new device for liquid argon scintillation light detec- tion.JINST, 11(02):C02004, 2016.doi:10.1088/ 1748-0221/11/02/C02004

  16. [16]

    Enhancement of the X-Arapuca photon detection device for the DUNE experiment

    C. Brizzolari et al. Enhancement of the X-Arapuca photon detection device for the DUNE experiment. JINST, 16(09):P09027, 2021.arXiv:2104.07548, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/09/P09027

  17. [17]

    Improvement and Characterisation of the ArCLight Large-Area Dielectric Light Detector for Liquid-Argon Time Projection Chambers

    Jonas B¨ urgi, Livio Calivers, Richard Diurba, Fabian Frieden, Anja Gauch, Laura Francesca Ia- cob, Igor Kreslo, Jan Kunzmann, Saba Parsa, and Michele Weber. Improvement and Characterisation of the ArCLight Large-Area Dielectric Light Detec- tor for Liquid-Argon Time Projection Chambers. Instruments, 8(4):48, 2024.arXiv:2409.13613, doi:10.3390/instruments8040048

  18. [18]

    Anfimov et al

    N. Anfimov et al. Development of the Light Collec- tion Module for the Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC).JINST, 15(07):C07022, 2020. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/07/C07022

  19. [19]

    Performance of a Modular Ton-Scale Pixel-Readout Liquid Ar- gon Time Projection Chamber.Instruments, 8(3):41, 2024.arXiv:2403.03212,doi:10.3390/ instruments8030041

    Adam Abed Abud et al. Performance of a Modular Ton-Scale Pixel-Readout Liquid Ar- gon Time Projection Chamber.Instruments, 8(3):41, 2024.arXiv:2403.03212,doi:10.3390/ instruments8030041

  20. [20]

    Development of an anti-Compton veto for HPGe detectors operated in liquid argon using Silicon Photo-Multipliers

    Jozsef Janicsko-Csathy, Hossein Aghaei Khozani, Xiang Liu, Bela Majorovits, and Allen Cald- well. Development of an anti-Compton veto for HPGe detectors operated in liquid argon using Silicon Photo-Multipliers.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 654:225–232, 2011.arXiv:1011.2748,doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2011.05.070

  21. [21]

    Agostini et al

    M. Agostini et al. Liquid argon light collection and veto modeling in GERDA Phase II.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(4):319, 2023.arXiv:2212.02856,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11354-9

  22. [22]

    The LEGEND-200 LAr instrumentation in the search of neutrinoless double beta decay.Nucl

    Nina Burlac and Giuseppe Salamanna. The LEGEND-200 LAr instrumentation in the search of neutrinoless double beta decay.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 1048:167943, 2023.doi:10.1016/j. nima.2022.167943

  23. [23]

    Mart´ ınez-Lema et al

    G. Mart´ ınez-Lema et al. Calibration of the NEXT- White detector using 83mKr decays.JINST, 13(10):P10014, 2018.arXiv:1804.01780,doi:10. 1088/1748-0221/13/10/P10014

  24. [24]

    Mart´ ınez-Lema et al

    G. Mart´ ınez-Lema et al. First results of the NEXT- 100 detector using 83mKr decays. 11 2025.arXiv: 2511.01710

  25. [25]

    S. R. Soleti. Towards a fiber barrel detector for next-generation high-pressure gaseous xenon TPCs.JINST, 19(04):C04042, 2024.arXiv:2312. 05567,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/04/C04042

  26. [26]

    Plastic fibers.https://www.kuraray

    Kuraray. Plastic fibers.https://www.kuraray. com/uploads/5a717515df6f5/PR0150_psf01. pdf, 2026

  27. [27]

    MPPC S13360-6075PE

    Hamamatsu. MPPC S13360-6075PE. https://www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/ optical-sensors/mppc/mppc_mppc-array/ S13360-6075PE.html, 2026

  28. [28]

    H13543-20.https: //www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/ optical-sensors/pmt/pmt-module/ current-output-type/H13543-20.html, 2026

    Hamamatsu. H13543-20.https: //www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/ optical-sensors/pmt/pmt-module/ current-output-type/H13543-20.html, 2026

  29. [29]

    V. M. Gehman, S. R. Seibert, K. Rielage, A. Hime, Y. Sun, D. M. Mei, J. Maassen, and D. Moore. Flu- orescence Efficiency and Visible Re-emission Spec- trum of Tetraphenyl Butadiene Films at Extreme Ultraviolet Wavelengths.Nucl. Instrum. Meth., A654:116–121, 2011.arXiv:1104.3259,doi:10. 1016/j.nima.2011.06.088

  30. [30]

    J. G. Saraiva, A. Maio, J. Patriarca, A. Wemans, and M. J. P. Maneira. The aluminization of 600-k WLS fibers for the TileCal/ATLAS/LHC.IEEE 18 Trans. Nucl. Sci., 51:1235–1241, 2004.doi:10. 1109/TNS.2004.829387

  31. [31]

    Plastic scintilla- tors.https://eljentechnology.com/ products/plastic-scintillators/ ej-200-ej-204-ej-208-ej-212, 2026

    Eljen Technology. Plastic scintilla- tors.https://eljentechnology.com/ products/plastic-scintillators/ ej-200-ej-204-ej-208-ej-212, 2026

  32. [32]

    PS4-MT3 series.https:// puregasproducts.com/ps4.htm, 2026

    SAES. PS4-MT3 series.https:// puregasproducts.com/ps4.htm, 2026

  33. [33]

    2740 Digitizer Family.https://www.caen

    CAEN. 2740 Digitizer Family.https://www.caen. it/subfamilies/2740-digitizer-family/, 2026

  34. [34]

    Plastic Scintillating Fibers

    Luxium. Plastic Scintillating Fibers. https://luxiumsolutions.com/sites/default/ files/2021-11/Fiber-Product-Sheet.pdf, 2026

  35. [35]

    R8520-406-001.https: //www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/ optical-sensors/pmt/pmt_tube-alone/ metal-package-type/R8520-406-001.html, 2026

    Hamamatsu. R8520-406-001.https: //www.hamamatsu.com/eu/en/product/ optical-sensors/pmt/pmt_tube-alone/ metal-package-type/R8520-406-001.html, 2026

  36. [36]

    Dossi, A

    R. Dossi, A. Ianni, G. Ranucci, and O. Yu. Smirnov. Methods for precise photoelectron count- ing with photomultipliers.Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 451:623–637, 2000.doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(00) 00337-5

  37. [37]

    Saito, S

    K. Saito, S. Sasaki, H. Tawara, T. Sanami, and E. Shibamura. Simultaneous measurements of ab- solute numbers of electrons and scintillation pho- tons produced by 5.49-MeV alpha particles in rare gases.IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 50:2452–2469, 2003. doi:10.1109/TNS.2003.820615

  38. [38]

    Charmonium Spectroscopy From Radiative Decays of theJ/ψandψ ′

    John Erthal Gaiser. Charmonium Spectroscopy From Radiative Decays of theJ/ψandψ ′. PhD thesis, 8 1982

  39. [39]

    Ionization and scintillation response of high-pressure xenon gas to alpha particles

    V. Alvarez et al. Ionization and scintillation re- sponse of high-pressure xenon gas to alpha parti- cles.JINST, 8:P05025, 2013.arXiv:1211.4508, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/05/P05025

  40. [40]

    Reflectance of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for Xenon Scintillation Light

    C. Silva, J. Pinto da Cunha, A. Pereira, V. Chepel, M. I. Lopes, V. Solovov, and F. Neves. Reflectance of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for Xenon Scin- tillation Light.J. Appl. Phys., 107:064902, 2010. arXiv:0910.1056,doi:10.1063/1.3318681

  41. [41]

    Agostinelli et al

    S. Agostinelli et al. GEANT4–a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 506:250–303, 2003.doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

  42. [42]

    Khodaei, A

    A. Khodaei, A. N. Z. Rashed, F. Moradi, H. A. Abdul-Rashid, and D. A. Bradley. A review of the Geant4 simulation platform for applications involv- ing optical-based sensing and dosimetry.Radia- tion Physics and Chemistry, 212:111062, Novem- ber 2023.doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023. 111062

  43. [43]

    Levin and C

    A. Levin and C. Moisan. A more physical approach to model the surface treatment of scintillation coun- ters and its implementation into DETECT. In 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Confer- ence Record, volume 2, pages 702–706 vol.2, 1996. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.1996.591410

  44. [44]

    Computational studies of light acceptance and propagation in straight and curved multimodal active fibres

    C. Patrick Achenbach and John H. Cobb. Compu- tational studies of light acceptance and propagation in straight and curved multimodal active fibres.J. Opt. A, 5:239–249, 2003.arXiv:nucl-ex/0606024, doi:10.1088/1464-4258/5/3/316

  45. [45]

    J.D. Weiss. Trapping efficiency of fluorescent opti- cal fibers.Optical Engineering, 54(2):027101, 2015. doi:10.1117/1.OE.54.2.027101

  46. [46]

    Measurements of the intrinsic quan- tum efficiency and absorption length of tetraphenyl butadiene thin films in the vacuum ultraviolet regime.Eur

    Christopher Benson, Gabriel Orebi Gann, and Vic- tor Gehman. Measurements of the intrinsic quan- tum efficiency and absorption length of tetraphenyl butadiene thin films in the vacuum ultraviolet regime.Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(4):329, 2018.arXiv: 1709.05002,doi:10.1140/s10052-018-5807-z

  47. [47]

    Bae et al

    W. Bae et al. Response of wavelength-shifting and scintillating-wavelength-shifting fibers to ionizing radiation. 9 2025.arXiv:2510.15913

  48. [48]

    A. F. B. Isabel, F. Kellerer, P. Saharia, R. C. Sousa, J. M. R. Teixeira, J. M. F. dos Santos, N. Lopez-March, C. A. O. Henriques, J. Martin- Albo, and C. M. B. Monteiro. Measurement of dual- component attenuation length in square BCF-92 and round Y11 wavelength-shifting fibers.JINST, 21(01):C01007, 2026.doi:10.1088/1748-0221/ 21/01/C01007

  49. [49]

    Lorca et al

    D. Lorca et al. Characterisation of NEXT- DEMO using xenon K α X-rays.JINST, 9(10):P10007, 2014.arXiv:1407.3966,doi:10. 1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10007

  50. [50]

    Iono- luminescence properties of polystyrene-hosted fluo- rophore films induced by helium ions of energy 50– 350 kev.Physical Review Materials, 1(5):055201, 2017

    Subha Chakraborty and Mengbing Huang. Iono- luminescence properties of polystyrene-hosted fluo- rophore films induced by helium ions of energy 50– 350 kev.Physical Review Materials, 1(5):055201, 2017

  51. [51]

    Leardini, E

    S. Leardini, E. S´ anchez Garc´ ıa, P. Amedo, A. Saa- Hern´ andez, D. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, R. Santorelli, D. J. Fern´ andez-Posada, and D. Gonz´ alez. Time and band-resolved scintillation in time projection cham- bers based on gaseous xenon.Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(5):425, 2022.arXiv:2112.04750,doi:10. 1140/epjc/s10052-022-10385-y

  52. [52]

    E. Segreto. Evidence of delayed light emission of TetraPhenyl Butadiene excited by liquid Ar- gon scintillation light.Phys. Rev. C, 91(3):035503, 2015.arXiv:1411.4524,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 91.035503. 19

  53. [53]

    Characterization of the scintillation time response of liquid argon detectors for dark matter search

    P. Agnes et al. Characterization of the scintil- lation time response of liquid argon detectors for dark matter search.JINST, 16(11):P11026, 2021. arXiv:2110.05350,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/ 11/P11026

  54. [54]

    Brekhovskikh, R

    V. Brekhovskikh, R. I. Dzhelyadin, A. K. Kono- plyannikov, and V. I. Rykaline. The WLS fiber time properties study. 10 2000

  55. [55]

    Masayo Suzuki, Jian zhi Ruan(Gen), and Shin- zou Kubota. Time dependence of the re- combination luminescence from high-pressure argon, krypton and xenon excited by alpha particles.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 192(2):565–574, 1982. URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/0029554X82908746, doi:10.1016/0029-554X(82)90874-6

  56. [56]

    Spectroscopic analysis of the argon scintillation with a wavelength sensitive particle detector

    R. Santorelli, E. Sanchez Garcia, P. Garcia Abia, D. Gonz´ alez-D´ ıaz, R. Lopez Manzano, J. J. Mar- tinez Morales, V. Pesudo, and L. Romero. Spec- troscopic analysis of the gaseous argon scintillation with a wavelength sensitive particle detector.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(7):622, 2021.arXiv:2012.08262, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09375-3

  57. [57]

    Average numbers of scintillation photons and electrons produced by an alpha particle in high- density xenon gas.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 48(7R):076501, 2009

    Mitsuteru Mimura, Shingo Kobayashi, Naoki Masuyama, Mitsuhiro Miyajima, and Nobuyuki Hasebe. Average numbers of scintillation photons and electrons produced by an alpha particle in high- density xenon gas.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 48(7R):076501, 2009

  58. [58]

    C. A. O. Henriques, J. M. R. Teixeira, P. A. O. C. Silva, R. D. P. Mano, J. M. F. dos Santos, and C. M. B. Monteiro. Understanding the xenon pri- mary scintillation yield for cutting-edge rare event experiments.JCAP, 06:041, 2024.arXiv:2309. 14202,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/041

  59. [59]

    Micromegas operation in high pressure xenon: charge and scintillation readout

    C. Balan, E. D. C. Freitas, T. Papaevangelou, I. Giomataris, H. Natal da Luz, C. M. B. Monteiro, and J. M. F. dos Santos. Micromegas operation in high pressure xenon: Charge and scintillation read- out.JINST, 6:P02006, 2011.arXiv:1009.2960, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/6/02/P02006

  60. [60]

    Novella et al

    P. Novella et al. Radiogenic Backgrounds in the NEXT Double Beta Decay Experiment.JHEP, 10:051, 2019.arXiv:1905.13625,doi:10.1007/ JHEP10(2019)051