Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 88 references

A temporary decay window after freeze-out can reset overproduced thermal dark matter to the observed relic.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 06:20 UTC pith:DPCKFTGL

load-bearing objection Clean, novel transient-decay-plus-FOPT rescue for overproduced thermal DM that works on the shown benchmarks and is worth a referee. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08838 v1 pith:DPCKFTGL submitted 2026-07-09 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Dark Phoenix: dark matter relic from its own decay

Debasish Borah , Satyabrata Mahapatra , Indrajit Saha , Narendra Sahu , Vicky Singh Thounaojam This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords dark matter relictransient decayfirst-order phase transitionconversion-driven freeze-outlong-lived charged particlesgravitational wavesultra-relativistic freeze-out
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that dark matter that freezes out with far too large a relic density can still end up with the observed abundance if it is allowed to decay for a finite temperature interval and then is made stable again. Finite-temperature mass corrections open a window in which the dark-matter fermion becomes heavier than its charged scalar partner and therefore decays; a first-order phase transition driven by a third scalar then jumps the partner mass upward and shuts the window. The charged partner must annihilate efficiently while the window is open so that its later decays do not regenerate too much dark matter. The same charged scalar yields long-lived tracks or missing-energy signals at colliders, and the phase transition itself can source gravitational waves accessible to LISA. The construction therefore revives a slice of thermal dark-matter parameter space that ordinary freeze-out would overclose, while pointing to concrete collider and gravitational-wave tests.

Core claim

Thermally overproduced dark matter can be brought to the observed relic density by a transient decay window that opens after freeze-out, when finite-temperature effects make the dark-matter mass larger than that of its dark-sector partner, and that is closed by a first-order phase transition that suddenly raises the partner mass, provided the partner annihilates efficiently enough that its subsequent decays do not re-overproduce dark matter.

What carries the argument

The Dark Phoenix window: a temperature interval T_n < T < T_s in which m_ψ(T) > m_ϕ(T) so that ψ → ϕ e is kinematically open, terminated by a discontinuous jump in m_ϕ at a first-order phase transition; the Boltzmann system that tracks both species through this window and the subsequent ϕ annihilations.

Load-bearing premise

That dark matter can freeze out while still ultra-relativistic with only perturbative couplings, yet the later phase transition still occurs low enough in temperature for the decay window to last long enough to remove the excess relic.

What would settle it

A concrete realization in which the nucleation temperature required by the observed relic exceeds roughly 0.03 times the dark-matter mass, or in which the charged partner cannot annihilate fast enough, so that late decays regenerate an over-abundant relic; either outcome would show the mechanism cannot reach Ωh² ≈ 0.12.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Regions of thermal dark-matter parameter space that would otherwise overclose the Universe become viable once the transient decay is included.
  • The charged scalar partner must be pair-produced at colliders and can appear as disappearing tracks or heavy stable charged particles for the small Yukawa couplings needed by the mechanism.
  • Direct-detection rates remain far below current and near-future sensitivity because the same small Yukawa suppresses both electron and loop-induced nucleon scattering.
  • The associated first-order phase transition produces a stochastic gravitational-wave spectrum whose peak frequency lies below ~0.1 Hz and can be within reach of LISA and related detectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the phase-transition scale is forced below the dark-matter mass, any future non-observation of gravitational waves in the LISA band would tighten the allowed window for the whole construction rather than merely constrain one benchmark.
  • The same charged scalar that must annihilate efficiently is also the particle that produces the long-lived-track signatures; a null result from dedicated HSCP/DT searches would therefore force either larger mass splittings or larger Yukawas that risk re-overproducing the relic.
  • Ultra-relativistic freeze-out itself may be difficult to embed in a fully consistent early-Universe thermal history once electroweak and other Standard-Model thresholds are taken into account, potentially limiting the mass range in which the mechanism can operate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a “Dark Phoenix” mechanism that reduces a thermally overproduced dark-matter abundance to the observed value by opening a transient decay window after freeze-out. Finite-temperature mass shifts make the Dirac fermion DM ψ heavier than its charged scalar partner ϕ for a finite interval T_n < T < T_s, allowing ψ → ϕ e_R; a first-order phase transition driven by an additional scalar η then jumps m_ϕ, closing the window and restoring ψ as the lightest stable particle. The charged scalar ϕ is required to annihilate efficiently (via gauge and portal couplings) so that its subsequent late decay does not regenerate an excess of ψ. The mechanism is realized in a minimal Z_2-odd dark sector with the interaction (1) and scalar potential (2). Three explicit FOPT benchmarks (Table I) are shown to produce the correct relic (Fig. 2 right panel) via the Boltzmann system (B1), while collider signatures of long-lived ϕ and gravitational-wave spectra from the FOPT are discussed.

Significance. If the construction holds, it supplies a new, falsifiable route to light thermal DM that would otherwise overclose the Universe, complementary to conversion-driven freeze-out and entropy dilution. The same charged scalar that enables efficient annihilation yields concrete collider targets (disappearing tracks, HSCP) already constrained by LHC searches, and the required FOPT produces GW spectra that peak below ~0.1 Hz and lie within the projected reach of LISA and μARES (Appendix C, Fig. 8). The explicit Boltzmann evolution, finite-T mass formulae, and tabulated phase-transition parameters make the claim reproducible for the chosen points and open a clear experimental correlation between DM relic, long-lived charged tracks, and stochastic GW backgrounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion, constraint (5) and Appendix A] Constraint (5) and the paragraph that follows it correctly note that ordinary Boltzmann freeze-out would force non-perturbative λ_12. The paper therefore adopts ultra-relativistic freeze-out (UFO) with T_F.O. ≫ m_ψ. However, the manuscript never demonstrates that a perturbative λ_12 can simultaneously realize UFO, keep the decay window open long enough (T_n ≲ 0.03 m_ψ from Appendix A), and still allow ϕ to annihilate efficiently after the FOPT. A quantitative scan or analytic estimate of the viable (λ_12, y, T_n) region under the UFO condition of Ref. [60] is needed to establish that the mechanism is not confined to a measure-zero corner of parameter space.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 2 right panel and Boltzmann equations (B1)] The right panel of Fig. 2 and the Boltzmann system (B1) show that ϕ remains in equilibrium and is depleted before its late decay can regenerate ψ. The text asserts that gauge interactions plus the portal λ_12 suffice, yet no explicit calculation of ⟨σv⟩_ϕϕ→SM (or of the temperature at which ϕ freezes out relative to T_n) is provided for the three benchmarks of Table I. Without this, it is not possible to verify that late ϕ → ψ e_R does not re-overproduce the relic for the quoted values of y and Δm.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction and Fig. 3] In the Introduction the mechanism is said to be “complementary to conversion-driven freeze-out,” yet the cyan points in Fig. 3 are described as regions where CDFO alone overproduces DM. A short quantitative comparison (e.g., the ratio of final Y_ψ with and without the transient window) would clarify the distinction.
  2. [The Framework, Eq. (3)] The field-dependent masses (3) set μ_ϕ2 = 0 “for simplicity.” A brief statement of how a non-zero μ_ϕ2 would shift T_c, T_n and α would strengthen the robustness claim for the FOPT benchmarks.
  3. [Appendix B] Appendix B quotes σ_ψe ~ 10^{-67} cm^{2} and loop-induced SI/SD cross sections ~10^{-70}–10^{-94} cm^{2}, but does not show the corresponding exclusion curves from XENON or LZ. Adding them to Fig. 3 or Fig. 4 would make the direct-detection discussion self-contained.
  4. [Throughout] Typographical inconsistencies appear in the temperature labels (T_s vs. T_s, T_n vs. T_n) and in the citation of the UFO reference [60]; a uniform notation pass would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the Dark Phoenix mechanism is an independent dynamical proposal whose parameters are tuned to match the observed relic, not defined by it.

full rationale

The paper introduces a concrete particle-physics setup (Z2-odd Dirac fermion ψ + charged scalar φ + FOPT-driving scalar η) whose finite-temperature masses (Eqs. 3–4) open a transient decay window Tn < T < Ts. The subsequent evolution is governed by the standard Boltzmann system (B1) that includes the temperature-dependent decay width (B2) and the usual annihilation/co-scattering rates. The three benchmark points in Table I and the cyan points in Fig. 3 are chosen so that the final Yψ equals the observed Ωh^{2} ≈ 0.12; that is ordinary parameter tuning, not a definitional identity. Appendix A’s bound Tn ≲ 0.03 mψ is derived from the independent requirement Y_EQ(Tn) = Y_req and is not circular. The only mild self-reference is the adoption of the ultra-relativistic freeze-out regime of Ref. [60] (an external citation) to keep λ12 perturbative; this does not force the relic result by construction. No equation reduces tautologically to a fitted constant, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work, and the GW spectra of Appendix C are standard FOPT calculations. Hence the circularity score is 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on a Z2-stabilized dark sector containing a Dirac fermion and a hypercharge-1 scalar, an additional complex scalar that undergoes a first-order phase transition, and a set of free couplings and mass parameters tuned so that freeze-out is ultra-relativistic, a decay window opens, and the partner annihilates efficiently. These ingredients are not derived from a more fundamental theory; they are postulated to realize the mechanism.

free parameters (4)
  • λ_12 (portal coupling η–ϕ)
    Set to O(1–3) by hand to guarantee both a strong FOPT and efficient ϕ annihilation; appears in mass formulae (3)–(4) and constraint (5).
  • Yukawa y (ψ–ϕ–e_R)
    Chosen ~10^{-6}–10^{-7} so that freeze-out is ultra-relativistic and the transient decay is neither too fast nor too slow; controls both relic and collider lifetime.
  • μ_ϕ, v_η, λ_ηϕ2 (and related scalar potential parameters)
    Tuned to produce the three benchmark points of Table I with the required T_n ≲ 0.03 m_ψ and large α.
  • Δm = m_ϕ – m_ψ at T=0
    Free mass splitting that sets the kinematic window and the ϕ lifetime; scanned in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption An unbroken Z2 symmetry stabilizes the lightest odd particle (ψ or ϕ depending on temperature).
    Stated in the Framework section; without it the decay products would not remain dark.
  • standard math Finite-temperature corrections to scalar masses are given by the standard high-T expansion (4).
    Used to open the decay window; standard result of thermal field theory.
  • ad hoc to paper A first-order phase transition with nucleation temperature T_n ≲ 0.03 m_ψ can be realized with the potential (2).
    Appendix A derives the numerical bound; the existence of such a transition for the chosen parameters is assumed rather than proven from a UV completion.
  • domain assumption ϕ remains in chemical equilibrium with the SM bath long enough for its abundance to be Boltzmann-suppressed before it decays outside the window.
    Required so that late ϕ → ψ e does not regenerate the overproduced relic; asserted via gauge and λ_12 couplings.
invented entities (3)
  • Dirac fermion ψ (DM candidate) no independent evidence
    purpose: Carries the observed relic after the transient decay window.
    Standard singlet fermion; no independent mass or coupling prediction beyond the relic requirement.
  • Complex scalar ϕ of hypercharge 1 independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the decay channel inside the window and the annihilating NLSP that prevents late overproduction; also the collider signature.
    Charged under SM hypercharge so that it couples to Z/γ and can be pair-produced; mass and lifetime are free.
  • Complex scalar η (plus real scalar ϕ2) independent evidence
    purpose: Drives the first-order phase transition that jumps m_ϕ and closes the decay window; sources gravitational waves.
    Introduced solely to generate the required FOPT; parameters chosen to match Table I.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 20391 in / 3334 out tokens · 30766 ms · 2026-07-13T06:20:29.621636+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a novel mechanism for generating correct relic of dark matter (DM) which otherwise gets thermally overproduced from the conventional freeze-out mechanism. The mechanism, dubbed as {\it Dark Phoenix}, relies on a transient decay window for DM after its freeze-out which brings its relic within observed limits. Due to finite-temperature effects on masses, DM $\psi$ becomes heavier than its dark sector partner $\phi$ in this window allowing it to decay. The decay of DM then stops after $\phi$ gets a sudden jump in its mass from a first-order phase transition (FOPT) driven by another scalar $\eta$. The dark sector partner $\phi$, assumed to be a charged scalar, undergoes sufficient pair annihilation during this epoch such that its late decay into DM does not overproduce the latter again. While direct-detection rates of DM remains suppressed due to small couplings, the charged scalar $\phi$ can have interesting signatures like long-lived charged track at colliders. The associated FOPT can also lead to observable gravitational waves at future experiments like LISA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08838 by Debasish Borah, Indrajit Saha, Narendra Sahu, Satyabrata Mahapatra, Vicky Singh Thounaojam.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic of the proposed mechanism. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left panel: Variation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The parameter space consistent with the observed relic density (Ωh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The decay length is shown together with the 95% [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The figure shows the values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ψ ψ q q e− R e− R ϕ+ Z ψ ψ q q ϕ+ ϕ+ e− R h FIG. 7: Feynman diagrams illustrating the spin-dependent process (left panel) and the spin-independent process (right panel) relevant for direct detection. The effective Lagrangian for the spin-dependent and spin independent DM detection is Lef f ⊃ ( ξqψγµγ 5ψqγµγ 5 q, SD Λqψψqq, SI (B4) where the effective couplings are given by ξq = y 2aq 32π 2M2 Z " (vl + al)G… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Feynman diagrams illustrating the process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The FOPT-generated total gravitational wave spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 70 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter, 2406.01705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Kolb and M.S

    E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner,The Early Universe, Front. Phys.69(1990) 1

    1990

  3. [3]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]. [7]LZcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011802 [2410.17036]. [8]XENONcollaboration,WIMP Dark Matter Search using a 3.1 ton...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Lee and S

    B.W. Lee and S. Weinberg,Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses,Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 165

    1977

  6. [6]

    Kolb and K.A

    E.W. Kolb and K.A. Olive,The Lee-Weinberg Bound Revisited,Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 1202

    1986

  7. [7]

    Boehm and P

    C. Boehm and P. Fayet,Scalar dark matter candidates, Nucl. Phys. B683(2004) 219 [hep-ph/0305261]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M.B. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B662(2008) 53 [0711.4866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    D’Agnolo and J.T

    R.T. D’Agnolo and J.T. Ruderman,Light Dark Matter from Forbidden Channels,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 061301 [1505.07107]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Berlin and N

    A. Berlin and N. Blinov,Thermal Dark Matter Below an MeV,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 021801 [1706.07046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    D’Agnolo, D

    R.T. D’Agnolo, D. Liu, J.T. Ruderman and P.-J. Wang,Forbidden dark matter annihilations into Standard Model particles,JHEP06(2021) 103 [2012.11766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Herms, S

    J. Herms, S. Jana, V.P. K. and S. Saad,Minimal Realization of Light Thermal Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 091803 [2203.05579]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Jaramillo,Reviving keV sterile neutrino dark matter,JCAP10(2022) 093 [2207.11269]

    C. Jaramillo,Reviving keV sterile neutrino dark matter,JCAP10(2022) 093 [2207.11269]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Borah, P

    D. Borah, P. Das, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu,Light thermal dark matter via type-I seesaw portal,JHEP08 (2025) 023 [2401.01639]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, N. Sahu and V.S. Thounaojam,Light thermal dark matter models in the light of DAMIC-M 2025 constraints,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 015026 [2509.16319]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Spergel and P.J

    D.N. Spergel and P.J. Steinhardt,Observational evidence for selfinteracting cold dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 3760 [astro-ph/9909386]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  17. [17]

    Tulin and H.-B

    S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu,Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure,Phys. Rept.730(2018) 1 [1705.02358]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, N. Sahu and V.S. Thounaojam,Self-interacting dark matter and the GRB221009A event,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083038 [2308.06172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu,New realization of light thermal self-interacting dark matter and detection prospects,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L091702 [2211.15703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, Boosted Self-Interacting Dark Matter and XENON1T Excess,2107.13176

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, Self-interacting Dark Matter via Right Handed Neutrino Portal,2110.00021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Borah, M

    D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, 6 Singlet-doublet self-interacting dark matter and radiative neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 075019 [2112.06847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, Unified origin of dark matter self interactions and low scale leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 095028 [2112.14786]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Dutta, N

    M. Dutta, N. Narendra, N. Sahu and S. Shil, Asymmetric self-interacting dark matter via Dirac leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 095017 [2202.04704]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Madhavacheril, N

    M.S. Madhavacheril, N. Sehgal and T.R. Slatyer, Current Dark Matter Annihilation Constraints from CMB and Low-Redshift Data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 103508 [1310.3815]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Slatyer,Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages

    T.R. Slatyer,Indirect dark matter signatures in the cosmic dark ages. I. Generalizing the bound on s-wave dark matter annihilation from Planck results,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023527 [1506.03811]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Griest and D

    K. Griest and D. Seckel,Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 3191

    1991

  28. [28]

    Evans, A

    J.A. Evans, A. Ghalsasi, S. Gori, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan,Light Dark Matter from Entropy Dilution, JHEP02(2020) 151 [1910.06319]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das, A.K. Saha and R. Samanta, Probing WIMP dark matter via gravitational waves’ spectral shapes,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) L011701 [2202.10474]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das and R. Samanta,Imprint of inflationary gravitational waves and WIMP dark matter in pulsar timing array data,JCAP03(2024) 031 [2307.00537]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Griest and M

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski,Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles,Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 615

    1990

  32. [32]

    Garny, J

    M. Garny, J. Heisig, B. L¨ ulf and S. Vogl, Coannihilation without chemical equilibrium,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 103521 [1705.09292]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    D’Agnolo, D

    R.T. D’Agnolo, D. Pappadopulo and J.T. Ruderman, Fourth Exception in the Calculation of Relic Abundances,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 061102 [1705.08450]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Heisig,Conversion-Driven Leptogenesis: A Testable Theory of Dark Matter and Baryogenesis at the Electroweak Scale,Phys

    J. Heisig,Conversion-Driven Leptogenesis: A Testable Theory of Dark Matter and Baryogenesis at the Electroweak Scale,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 191803 [2404.12428]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Cohen, D.E

    T. Cohen, D.E. Morrissey and A. Pierce,Changes in Dark Matter Properties After Freeze-Out,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 111701 [0808.3994]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  36. [36]

    Y. Cui, L. Randall and B. Shuve,Emergent Dark Matter, Baryon, and Lepton Numbers,JHEP08 (2011) 073 [1106.4834]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  37. [37]

    Baker and J

    M.J. Baker and J. Kopp,Dark Matter Decay between Phase Transitions at the Weak Scale,Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(2017) 061801 [1608.07578]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Baker, M

    M.J. Baker, M. Breitbach, J. Kopp and L. Mittnacht, Dynamic Freeze-In: Impact of Thermal Masses and Cosmological Phase Transitions on Dark Matter Production,JHEP03(2018) 114 [1712.03962]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Bian and X

    L. Bian and X. Liu,Two-step strongly first-order electroweak phase transition modified FIMP dark matter, gravitational wave signals, and the neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 055003 [1811.03279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Baker and L

    M.J. Baker and L. Mittnacht,Variations on the Vev Flip-Flop: Instantaneous Freeze-out and Decaying Dark Matter,JHEP05(2019) 070 [1811.03101]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Bian and Y.-L

    L. Bian and Y.-L. Tang,Thermally modified sterile neutrino portal dark matter and gravitational waves from phase transition: The Freeze-in case,JHEP12 (2018) 006 [1810.03172]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Heurtier and H

    L. Heurtier and H. Partouche,Spontaneous Freeze Out of Dark Matter From an Early Thermal Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 043527 [1912.02828]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Baker, J

    M.J. Baker, J. Kopp and A.J. Long,Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 151102 [1912.02830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Croon, G

    D. Croon, G. Elor, R. Houtz, H. Murayama and G. White,Light dark matter through resonance scanning,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L061303 [2012.15284]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    G. Elor, R. McGehee and A. Pierce,Maximizing Direct Detection with Highly Interactive Particle Relic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 031803 [2112.03920]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  46. [46]

    Hashino, J

    K. Hashino, J. Liu, X.-P. Wang and K.-P. Xie,Dark matter transient annihilations in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 055009 [2109.07479]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Bian, Y.-L

    L. Bian, Y.-L. Tang and R. Zhou,FIMP dark matter mediated by massive gauge boson around the phase transition period and the gravitational waves production,2111.10608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Adhikary, D

    A. Adhikary, D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, I. Saha, N. Sahu and V.S. Thounaojam,New realisation of light thermal dark matter with enhanced detection prospects,JCAP12(2024) 043 [2405.17564]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Allahverdi, C

    R. Allahverdi, C. Hauptmann and P. Huang,Enhanced dark matter abundance in first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115005 [2409.02179]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and T.A. Wu,Reviving WIMP dark matter with temperature-dependent couplings, 2509.07070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Mahapatra, P.K

    S. Mahapatra, P.K. Paul and N. Sahu,Forbidden dark matter assisted by first-order phase transition and associated gravitational waves,2601.12319

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    Coleman and E.J

    S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg,Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1888

    1973

  53. [53]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

    1974

  54. [54]

    Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp

    M. Quiros,Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, inICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 187–259, 1, 1999 [hep-ph/9901312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  55. [55]

    Henrich, Y

    S.E. Henrich, Y. Mambrini and K.A. Olive, Ultrarelativistic Freeze-Out: A Bridge from WIMPs to FIMPs,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 221002 [2511.02117]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Frumkin, Y

    R. Frumkin, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama,Thermal Dark Matter from Freeze-Out of Inverse Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 121001 [2111.14857]. [62]ATLAScollaboration,Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in √s=13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 052005 [1911.12606...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies,Exper

    A. Sesana et al.,Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies,Exper. Astron.51(2021) 1333 [1908.11391]. [70]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Essig, T

    R. Essig, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu,New Constraints and Prospects for sub-GeV Dark Matter Scattering off Electrons in Xenon,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043017 [1703.00910]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Hoferichter, P

    M. Hoferichter, P. Klos, J. Men´ endez and A. Schwenk, Improved limits for Higgs-portal dark matter from LHC searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 181803 [1708.02245]. [73]HERMEScollaboration,Precise determination of the spin structure function g(1) of the proton, deuteron and neutron,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 012007 [hep-ex/0609039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Turner and F

    M.S. Turner and F. Wilczek,Relic gravitational waves and extended inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.65(1990) 3080

    1990

  61. [61]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins, Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4514

    1992

  62. [62]

    Kosowsky, M.S

    A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins, Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026

    1992

  63. [63]

    Kosowsky and M.S

    A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  64. [64]

    Turner, E.J

    M.S. Turner, E.J. Weinberg and L.M. Widrow,Bubble nucleation in first order inflation and other cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 2384

    1992

  65. [65]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Giblin and J.B

    J.T. Giblin and J.B. Mertens,Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023532 [1405.4005]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 103520 [1704.05871]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2837 [astro-ph/9310044]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  70. [70]

    Kosowsky, A

    A. Kosowsky, A. Mack and T. Kahniashvili, Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 024030 [astro-ph/0111483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  71. [71]

    Caprini and R

    C. Caprini and R. Durrer,Gravitational waves from stochastic relativistic sources: Primordial turbulence and magnetic fields,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 063521 [astro-ph/0603476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  72. [72]

    Gogoberidze, T

    G. Gogoberidze, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky, The Spectrum of Gravitational Radiation from Primordial Turbulence,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 083002 [0705.1733]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [73]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition,JCAP12(2009) 024 [0909.0622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Niksa, M

    P. Niksa, M. Schlederer and G. Sigl,Gravitational Waves produced by Compressible MHD Turbulence from Cosmological Phase Transitions,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 144001 [1803.02271]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al.,Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP04(2016) 001 [1512.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update, JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,Phase Transitions in an Expanding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories,JCAP01(2021) 001 [2007.08537]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Espinosa, T

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions,JCAP06(2010) 028 [1004.4187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  79. [79]

    Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications,Phys

    A.D. Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications,Phys. Lett. B 100(1981) 37

    1981

  80. [80]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek and M. Pintar,FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107480 [2002.00881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.