Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 103 references

Tens of MeV, collimated, bright fluxes of protons from ordered nano-structured targets in ultra-relativistic laser-matter interaction

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Ordered nickel nanowires keep raising proton cutoff energy and beam collimation even under ordinary petawatt contrast.

desk verdict Solid ELI-NP comparison showing nanowire TNSA gains and collimation hold at realistic ~10^{-10} contrast; residual cutoff attribution after Zimmer scaling is imperfect but not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.09229 v1 pith:WOKX43Y5 submitted 2026-07-10 physics.plasm-ph

Sagar Dam , Stefania Ionescu , Jian Fuh Ong , Ameya Parab , Sk Rakeeb , Hideaki Habara , Gabriel Cojocaru , Vojtěch Horný
show 15 more authors
Dmitrii Nistor Saidbek Norbaev Rudrajyoti Palit Daniel Popa Deepak Sangwan Klaus Spohr Bianca Stan Antonia Toma Lucian Tudor Daniel Ursescu Adrian Vatcu Keita Yamanaka Prashant Kumar Singh Kazuo A. Tanaka G. Ravindra Kumar
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.38.Kd52.50.Jm52.65.Rr
keywords laser-drivenprotonaccelerationTNSAnanowiretargetslasercontrastangulardistributionparticle-in-cellsimulationpetawattlasers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that ordered nickel nanowire targets still deliver higher proton cutoff energies and brighter, more directional high-energy beams than flat foils when irradiated at ~3 imes10^21 W cm^{-2}, whether the laser contrast is the facility’s native ~10^{-10} or cleaned to ~10^{-13}. The structures remain useful under the pre-pulse levels typical of multi-petawatt systems, so extreme contrast cleaning is not required for the gain to appear. Energy-resolved imaging further shows that the wires steer high-energy protons into a narrower cone along the target normal. Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations reproduce both the spectral improvement and the collimation, attributing the tighter beam to stronger rear-side toroidal magnetic fields that deflect off-axis protons. The result supplies a practical route to brighter, more usable laser-driven proton sources at present-day facilities.

What carries the argument

Target-normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) strengthened by nanowire-enhanced hot-electron generation, which both raises the sheath field and amplifies the rear-side toroidal magnetic field that collimates the proton beam.

What would settle it

A side-by-side campaign that holds substrate thickness, rear-surface contamination layer, and measured pre-plasma scale length fixed while only the presence or absence of the nanowires is varied; if the cutoff and collimation advantages then disappear, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At intensities of ~3 imes10^{21} W cm^{-2}, ordered Ni nanowire targets produce a measurable rise in proton cutoff energy (roughly 29–32 MeV flat → 36–38 MeV nanowire) and a several-fold increase in high-energy flux that survives both ~10^{-10} and ~10^{-13} contrast; the same wires also reduce the angular divergence of protons above 12 MeV relative to flat foils.

Load-bearing premise

The leftover cutoff-energy gain after ordinary thickness scaling is credited mainly to the nanowires rather than to uncontrolled differences in substrate thickness, surface contamination, or pre-plasma shape among the nine targets.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports proton acceleration experiments at ELI-NP (~3×10^21 W cm^-2, ~23 fs) comparing ordered Ni nanowire/nanotube targets to flat Ni foils under two temporal-contrast regimes (~10^-10 without plasma mirror; ~10^-13 with a single plasma mirror). Using Thomson-parabola spectra along target normal and energy-resolved RCF angular maps, the authors find higher cutoff energies and high-energy proton flux for several nanowire configurations at both contrasts, together with narrower angular divergence of >12 MeV protons relative to flat foils. Coupled 3D radiation-hydrodynamics and PIC simulations reproduce the qualitative spectral and angular trends and attribute improved collimation to an enhanced rear-side toroidal magnetic field that preferentially deflects off-axis protons.

Significance. If the residual enhancement after thickness and pre-plasma effects is cleanly attributable to the ordered nanostructures, the result is practically important: it indicates that nanowire targets remain useful under contrast levels typical of multi-PW facilities, without requiring extreme plasma-mirror cleaning. The dual-contrast comparison, multi-geometry survey (Table I), and energy-resolved angular diagnostics are genuine strengths, as is the 3D RHD+PIC chain that links collimation to enhanced B_θ. These elements provide actionable guidance for detector placement and beam transport at ELI-NP and similar facilities, and a useful baseline for scaling toward 10 PW.

major comments (3)
  1. §III.A and Table I: The load-bearing claim that nanostructure-induced residual cutoff gain persists at ~10^-10 rests on the A-vs-B comparison (flat 2.0 µm → 29 MeV; NW 1.2 µm → 36 MeV) after applying Zimmer et al. empirical TNSA thickness scaling (predicted 31.5 MeV). Substrate thickness, wire length/diameter/gap, and (for NT) wall thickness all co-vary across the nine geometries; the thickest substrate (E, 3.5 µm) gives the lowest cutoff (26 MeV), while several high performers sit at 0.5–1.4 µm. Without a thickness-matched flat control fabricated by the same electrodeposition route, or a systematic thickness series at fixed nanostructure parameters, the residual cannot be cleanly isolated from substrate mass, rear-surface contamination, or pre-plasma morphology differences (Supp. Fig. 3). Please either add such a control/analysis or substantially qualify the attribution of the residual
  2. Supp. §IV (PIC setup): Hydrocarbon contamination is fixed at 50 nm with n_H = 27 n_cr and n_C = 159 n_cr and is never measured shot-to-shot. The authors note that contamination profile and density affect the proton spectrum, yet the reported cutoff/flux enhancement and conversion-efficiency ratio (0.8 % flat vs 2.1 % NW) are presented without a sensitivity scan over contamination thickness/density. Because the experimental residual cutoff claim is already thickness-sensitive, a brief contamination-parameter scan (or explicit statement that absolute cutoffs are not claimed to match experiment) is needed before the simulation can be used to reinforce the nanostructure-origin interpretation.
  3. §III.A (nanotube targets H vs I) and Fig. 3: The contrasting NT performance at the two contrasts is explained by lower material density and pre-plasma coupling, but no quantitative pre-plasma scale lengths or density profiles from the RHD stage are shown for the NT geometries, and the two NT targets differ in outer/inner diameter as well as contrast. The explanation remains qualitative; either support it with RHD lineouts for H/I or mark it as speculative so that it does not dilute the stronger NW results.
minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 3 and Table I: State explicitly how many shots enter each multi-shot-averaged spectrum and whether the horizontal error bars (pinhole width) fully capture shot-to-shot energy uncertainty; vertical error bars or shot-to-shot scatter would strengthen the cutoff comparisons.
  2. Fig. 5(a): Clarify whether the angular distributions are single-shot or averaged, and how the FWHM values (34.1° flat, 22.5° NW) were extracted from the RCF optical-density maps (lineout direction, background subtraction).
  3. §IV / Fig. 7: The toroidal-field lineouts are shown at three x positions; a short statement of the time at which B_z is evaluated relative to the laser peak would help the reader connect the field enhancement to the py–px fountain structures.
  4. Throughout: Normalize notation for contrast (10^{-10} vs ∼10^{-10}), and fix minor typos (e.g., “EXPERIMENT AL RESUL TS”, “SIMULA TION RESUL TS”, “nanowired target”).
  5. References: The related electron-emission preprint (Parab et al., arXiv:2605.18668) is cited for hot-electron generation; ensure the proton-focused claims of the present manuscript stand independently of that work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; measured proton cutoffs, fluxes and angular distributions stand on independent TP/RCF diagnostics, with PIC used only for post-hoc mechanistic support.

full rationale

The load-bearing claims (cutoff enhancement persisting at both ~10^{-10} and ~10^{-13} contrast, higher high-energy flux, and narrower angular emission for nanowires vs flat foils) are obtained directly from Thomson-parabola spectra and energy-resolved RCF stacks under the two experimental contrast settings; no free parameter is fitted to those data and then re-presented as a prediction. The residual gain after applying the external Zimmer et al. empirical thickness scaling is an interpretive attribution, not a self-fit that forces the result by construction. 3D RHD+PIC simulations import experimental-like laser parameters and pre-plasma profiles and reproduce qualitative trends (higher cutoff/flux, enhanced rear-side B_theta collimation), but the experimental observables are not redefined by the simulations. The single self-citation to the overlapping-author electron-emission preprint is used only to note a related hot-electron observation and is not required for the proton measurements or the B-field argument already present in the present PIC runs. No self-definitional loop, uniqueness import, or ansatz smuggled via citation appears in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is primarily experimental. Load-bearing background is standard TNSA physics, empirical thickness scaling, and the validity of chained 3D RHD→PIC modeling of prepulse expansion and main-pulse acceleration. Free parameters live mainly in the simulation chain (contamination layer, flux limiter, ionization/temperature homogenization) and in how residual cutoff beyond thickness scaling is attributed to nanostructures.

free parameters (4)
  • Hydrocarbon contamination layer (n_H, n_C, thickness)
    PIC assumes 50 nm rear contamination with n_H=27 n_cr, n_C=159 n_cr; authors note spectrum depends on this profile, which is not measured shot-by-shot.
  • RHD flux limiter
    FLASH uses flux limiter 0.08; affects prepulse heat transport and imported density profiles.
  • Ablation-onset fluence threshold model
    Prepulse ablation start times for flat vs NW targets are set by comparing accumulated fluence to a long-pulse ablation threshold formula along the contrast curve.
  • Zimmer et al. empirical TNSA thickness scaling applied to A vs B
    Used to subtract expected thickness-only gain (29→31.5 MeV) so residual cutoff is ascribed to nanowires; scaling is empirical and not re-derived here.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rear-side proton acceleration is dominated by TNSA along target normal under the stated intensity and target thicknesses.
    Stated throughout Introduction and Methods; diagnostics placed along target normal accordingly.
  • domain assumption 3D RHD (FLASH) with inverse-bremsstrahlung ray tracing plus 3D PIC (PIConGPU) adequately captures prepulse expansion and main-pulse ion acceleration for comparative flat vs NW trends.
    Simulation section and supplementary; multi-photon/BSI ionization omitted in RHD by code limitation.
  • domain assumption IP response and fading corrections from Martin et al. and related calibrations convert TP traces to absolute proton spectra.
    Methods and supplementary §II.
  • domain assumption Plasma-mirror contrast improvement to ~10^-13 at 50 ps is as estimated; native contrast ~10^-10.
    Fig. 1(c) and Methods; PM contrast is estimated rather than fully re-measured on every shot path.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tens of MeV, collimated, bright fluxes of protons from ordered nano-structured targets in ultra-relativistic laser-matter interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WOKX43Y5

@misc{pith2026260709229,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tens of MeV, collimated, bright fluxes of protons from ordered nano-structured targets in ultra-relativistic laser-matter interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WOKX43Y5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.09229}
}
abstract

Laser-driven proton acceleration from nanostructured solid targets has been extensively studied, yet its performance under realistic temporal contrast conditions at petawatt-class facilities remains an open question. We present an experimental investigation of proton generation from nanostructured and flat solid targets performed at the ELI-NP facility using femtosecond laser pulses at peak intensities of $\sim 3\times10^{21}$ \wcm. Proton spectra are compared for two contrast regimes: $\sim 10^{-10}$ without plasma mirror and $\sim 10^{-13}$ with single plasma mirror. Importantly, measurable enhancement in the cutoff energy persists for the nanowire targets at both contrast levels, indicating robustness of nanowire targets against moderate pre-pulse intensities. Alongside, study of energy resolved angular distribution reveals that nanowires promote more directional emission with higher flux of high-energy protons along the target normal, while flat targets produce broader angular distributions. The results are well supported and explained by 3D particle-in-cell simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09229 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the proton energy spectra for flat targets (A), Ni nanowire (B), clustered Ni nanowire (G), and nanotube (H) targets with contrast of 10−10 at 50 ps. In particular, the proton cutoff energy increases from ap￾proximately 29 MeV for the flat target to about 36 MeV for the Ni nanowire target. Using the empirical TNSA scaling proposed by Zimmer et al. [93], the proton cut￾off energy is expected to increase fro… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Deflection of ions due to the magnetic field in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. TR-IP calibration for different proton energy and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Snapshots of electron density of 3D RHD simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    at sharp features. Second, by comparing energy de- pendent angular distributions, the work shows how the nanostructures guide the higher energy protons and give a much more enhanced and directional emission of parti- cle beams. Third, the study compares the results of nine different kinds of structured and non-structured targets and gives an overview of t...

  2. [2]

    Physics and Astronomy (Project Identification No. RTI4002), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research

    section§3. More details on experimental methods in supplementary material.[77] B. Nanostructure growth Metallic nanowires and nanotubes were grown by elec- trochemical methods [see Fig. 2(a)-(d)], using a porous alumina template, which was obtained by aluminum an- odization in acidic electrolytes (oxalic, phosphoric and citric acid) [90]. By changing the ...

    2021

  3. [3]

    V. E. Fortov,Extreme states of matter: high energy density physics, Vol. 216 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London., 2005)

    P. Gibbon,Short pulse laser interactions with matter: an introduction(World Scientific, 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London., 2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    W.L.Kruer,The physics of laser plasma interaction (Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    Eliezer,The interaction of high-power lasers with plas- mas(CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002)

    S. Eliezer,The interaction of high-power lasers with plas- mas(CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002)

    2002

  7. [7]

    Snavely, M

    R. Snavely, M. Key, S. Hatchett, T. Cowan, M. Roth, T. Phillips, M. Stoyer, E. Henry, T. Sangster, M. Singh, et al., Intense high-energy proton beams from petawatt- laserirradiationofsolids, Physicalreviewletters85,2945 (2000)

    2000

  8. [8]

    Robson, P

    L. Robson, P. Simpson, R. J. Clarke, K. W. Leding- ham, F. Lindau, O. Lundh, T. McCanny, P. Mora, D. Neely, C.-G. Wahlström,et al., Scaling of proton ac- celeration driven by petawatt-laser–plasma interactions, Nature physics3, 58 (2007)

    2007

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    T. Kurz, T. Heinemann, M. Gilljohann, Y. Chang, J. Couperus Cabadağ, A. Debus, O. Kononenko, R. Pausch, S. Schöbel, R. Assmann,et al., Demonstra- tion of a compact plasma accelerator powered by laser- accelerated electron beams, Nature communications12, 2895 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    M. J. Hogan, C. Barnes, C. E. Clayton, F. Decker, S. Deng, P. Emma, C. Huang, R. Iverson, D. John- son, C. Joshi,et al., Multi-gev energy gain in a plasma- wakefield accelerator, Physical review letters95, 054802 (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Litos, E

    M. Litos, E. Adli, W. An, C. Clarke, C. E. Clayton, 9 S. Corde, J. Delahaye, R. England, A. Fisher, J. Fred- erico,et al., High-efficiency acceleration of an electron beam in a plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature515, 92 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Choudhary, L

    A. Choudhary, L. P. Goswami, C. Aparajit, A. D. Lad, A. Parab, Y. M. Ved, T. Dhalia, A. Das, and G. R. Ku- mar, Generation of mega-gauss axial and azimuthal mag- netic fields in a solid plasma by ultrahigh intensity, cir- cularly polarized femtosecond laser pulses, Fundamental...

    2025

  5. [13]

    Betti and O

    R. Betti and O. Hurricane, Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers, Nature Physics12, 435 (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Mulser and D

    P. Mulser and D. Bauer,High power laser-matter in- teraction, Vol. 238 (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  7. [15]

    C.Liu, V.K.Tripathi,andB.Eliasson,High-power laser- plasma interaction(Cambridge university press, Univer- sity Printing House, Cambridge cb2 8bs, United King- dom, 2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Myatt, J

    J. Myatt, J. Zhang, R. Short, A. Maximov, W. Seka, D. Froula, D. Edgell, D. Michel, I. Igumenshchev, D. Hinkel,et al., Multiple-beam laser–plasma interac- tions in inertial confinement fusion, Physics of Plasmas 21, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4878623 (2014)

    2014 doi

  9. [17]

    Chatterjee, P

    G. Chatterjee, P. K. Singh, A. Robinson, D. Black- man, N. Booth, O. Culfa, R. Dance, L. Gizzi, R. Gray, J.Green,et al.,Micron-scalemappingofmegagaussmag- netic fields using optical polarimetry to probe hot elec- tron transport in petawatt-class laser-solid interactions, Scien...

    2017

  10. [18]

    Dulat, C

    A. Dulat, C. Aparajit, A. Choudhary, A. D. Lad, Y. M. Ved, B. Paradkar, and G. Ravindra Kumar, Subpicosec- ond pre-plasma dynamics of a high contrast, ultraintense laser–solid target interaction, Optics Letters47, 5684 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    J. J. Rocca, M. G. Capeluto, R. C. Hollinger, S. Wang, Y. Wang, G. R. Kumar, A. D. Lad, A. Pukhov, and V. N. Shlyaptsev, Ultra-intense femtosecond laser interactions with aligned nanostructures, Optica11, 437 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    S. Dam, J. F. Ong, S. Rakeeb, A. Parab, A. C, Anandam, A. D. Lad, Y. M. Ved, M. Krishnamurthy, K. A. Tanaka, and G. R. Kumar, Impulsive excitation of a solid by ex- treme contrast, high-intensity femtosecond laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Res.8, 023017 (2026)

    2026

  13. [21]

    Schreiber, F

    J. Schreiber, F. Bell, F. Grüner, U. Schramm, M. Geissler, M. Schnürer, S. Ter-Avetisyan, B. M. Hegelich, J. Cobble, E. Brambrink,et al., Analytical model for ion acceleration by high-intensity laser pulses, Physical review letters97, 045005 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Borghesi, A

    M. Borghesi, A. Bigongiari, S. Kar, A. Macchi, L. Romagnani, P. Audebert, J. Fuchs, T. Toncian, O. Willi, S. Bulanov,et al., Laser-driven proton accel- eration: source optimization and radiographic applica- tions, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion50, 124040 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Gitomer, R

    S. Gitomer, R. Jones, F. Begay, A. Ehler, J. Kephart, and R. Kristal, Fast ions and hot electrons in the laser– plasma interaction, The Physics of fluids29, 2679 (1986)

    1986

  16. [24]

    A. Fews, P. Norreys, F. Beg, A. Bell, A. Dangor, C. Dan- son, P. Lee, and S. Rose, Plasma ion emission from high intensity picosecond laser pulse interactions with solid targets, Physical review letters73, 1801 (1994)

    1994

  17. [25]

    Maksimchuk, S

    A. Maksimchuk, S. Gu, K. Flippo, D. Umstadter, and V. Y. Bychenkov, Forward ion acceleration in thin films driven by a high-intensity laser, Physical Review Letters 84, 4108 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    F. Beg, A. Bell, A. Dangor, C. Danson, A. Fews, M. Glin- sky, B. Hammel, P. Lee, P. Norreys, and M. Tatarakis, A study of picosecond laser–solid interactions up to 1019 w cm- 2, Physics of plasmas4, 447 (1997)

    1997

  19. [27]

    Clark, K

    E. Clark, K. Krushelnick, M. Zepf, F. Beg, M. Tatarakis, A. Machacek, M. Santala, I. Watts, P. Norreys, and A. Dangor, Energetic heavy-ion and proton generation from ultraintense laser-plasma interactions with solids, Physical Review Letters85, 1654 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Clark, K

    E. Clark, K. Krushelnick, J. Davies, M. Zepf, M. Tatarakis, F. Beg, A. Machacek, P. Norreys, M. San- tala, I. Watts,et al., Measurements of energetic proton transport through magnetized plasma from intense laser interactions with solids, Physical Review Letters84, 670 (2000)

    2000

  21. [29]

    Macchi, M

    A. Macchi, M. Borghesi, and M. Passoni, Ion accelera- tion by superintense laser-plasma interaction, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 751 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Badziak, Laser-driven ion acceleration: methods, chal- lenges and prospects, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol

    J. Badziak, Laser-driven ion acceleration: methods, chal- lenges and prospects, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 959 (IOP Publishing, 2018) p. 012001

    2018

  23. [31]

    Kluge, S

    T. Kluge, S. Gaillard, K. A. Flippo, T. Burris-Mog, W. Enghardt, B. Gall, M. Geissel, A. Helm, S. Kraft, T. Lockard,et al., High proton energies from cone tar- gets: electron acceleration mechanisms, New Journal of Physics14, 023038 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Daido, M

    H. Daido, M. Nishiuchi, and A. S. Pirozhkov, Review of laser-driven ion sources and their applications, Reports on progress in physics75, 056401 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Willingale,Ion acceleration from high intensity laser plasma interactions: measurements and applications, Ph.D

    L. Willingale,Ion acceleration from high intensity laser plasma interactions: measurements and applications, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics, Imperial College London (2007)

    2007

  26. [34]

    Romagnani, J

    L. Romagnani, J. Fuchs, M. Borghesi, P. Antici, P. Au- debert, F. Ceccherini, T. Cowan, T. Grismayer, S. Kar, A. Macchi,et al., Dynamics of electric fields driving the laser acceleration of multi-MeV protons, Physical review letters95, 195001 (2005)

    2005

  27. [35]

    Ziegler, I

    T. Ziegler, I. Göthel, S. Assenbaum, C. Bernert, F.-E. Brack, T. Cowan, N. Dover, L. Gaus, T. Kluge, S. Kraft, F. Kroll, J. Metzkes-Ng, M. Nishiuchi, I. Prencipe, T. Püschel, M. Rehwald, M. Reimold, H.-P. Schlenvoigt, M. Umlandt, and K. Zeil, Laser-driven high-energy pro- ton ...

    2024

  28. [36]

    Cowan, J

    T. Cowan, J. Fuchs, H. Ruhl, A. Kemp, P. Audebert, M. Roth, R. Stephens, I. Barton, A. Blazevic, E. Bram- brink,et al., Ultralow emittance, multi-MeV proton beams from a laser virtual-cathode plasma accelerator, Physical review letters92, 204801 (2004)

    2004

  29. [37]

    Passoni, A

    M. Passoni, A. Sgattoni, I. Prencipe, L. Fedeli, D. Del- lasega, L. Cialfi, I. W. Choi, I. J. Kim, K. A. Janulewicz, H. W. Lee,et al., Toward high-energy laser-driven ion beams: Nanostructured double-layer targets, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams19, 061301 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Margarone, I

    D. Margarone, I. J. Kim, J. Psikal, J. Kaufman, T. Mo- cek, I. W. Choi, L. Stolcova, J. Proska, A. Chouk- ourov, I. Melnichuk,et al., Laser-driven high-energy proton beam with homogeneous spatial profile from a nanosphere target, Physical Review Special Top- ics—Accelerators a...

    2015

  31. [39]

    Floquet, O

    V. Floquet, O. Klimo, J. Psikal, A. Velyhan, 10 J. Limpouch, J. Proska, F. Novotny, L. Stolcova, A. Mac- chi, A. Sgattoni,et al., Micro-sphere layered targets ef- ficiency in laser driven proton acceleration, Journal of Applied Physics114, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819239 (2013)

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    Margarone, O

    D. Margarone, O. Klimo, I. J. Kim, J. Prokůpek, J. Limpouch, T.-M. Jeong, T. Mocek, J. Pšikal, H. T. Kim, J. Proška,et al., Laser-driven proton acceleration enhancement by nanostructured foils, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 234801 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Fedeli, A

    L. Fedeli, A. Formenti, L. Cialfi, A. Pazzaglia, and M. Passoni, Ultra-intense laser interaction with nanos- tructured near-critical plasmas, Scientific reports8, 3834 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Andreev, N

    A. Andreev, N. Kumar, K. Platonov, and A. Pukhov, Efficient generation of fast ions from surface mod- ulated nanostructure targets irradiated by high in- tensity short-pulse lasers, Physics of Plasmas18, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3641965 (2011)

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    Klimo, J

    O. Klimo, J. Psikal, J. Limpouch, J. Proska, F. Novotny, T. Ceccotti, V. Floquet, and S. Kawata, Short pulse laser interaction with micro-structured targets: simulations of laser absorption and ion acceleration, New journal of physics13, 053028 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    J. Yu, Z. Zhao, X. Jin, F. Wu, Y. Yan, W. Zhou, L. Cao, B. Li, and Y. Gu, Laser-driven proton acceleration us- ing a conical nanobrush target, Physics of Plasmas19, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4714809 (2012)

    2012 doi

  37. [45]

    Lübcke, A

    A. Lübcke, A. A. Andreev, S. Höhm, R. Grunwald, L. Ehrentraut, and M. Schnürer, Prospects of target nanostructuring for laser proton acceleration, Scientific reports7, 44030 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    L. Ji, S. Jiang, A. Pukhov, R. Freeman, and K. Akli, Exploring novel target structures for manipulating rela- tivisticlaser–plasmainteraction,Highpowerlaserscience and engineering5, e14 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Passoni, F

    M. Passoni, F. Arioli, L. Cialfi, D. Dellasega, L. Fedeli, A. Formenti, A. C. Giovannelli, A. Maffini, F. Mirani, A. Pazzaglia,et al., Advanced laser-driven ion sources and their applications in materials and nuclear science, PlasmaPhysicsandControlledFusion62,014022(2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Bagchi, P

    S. Bagchi, P. Prem Kiran, M. Bhuyan, S. Bose, P. Ayyub, M. Krishnamurthy, and G. Kumar, Fast ion beams from intense, femtosecond laser irradiated nanostructured sur- faces, Applied Physics B88, 167 (2007)

    2007

  41. [49]

    Giuffrida, K

    L. Giuffrida, K. Svensson, J. Psikal, M. Dalui, H. Ek- erfelt, I. Gallardo Gonzalez, O. Lundh, A. Persson, P. Lutoslawski, V. Scuderi,et al., Manipulation of laser- accelerated proton beam profiles by nanostructured and microstructured targets, Physical Review Accelerators and...

    2017

  42. [50]

    Torrisi, L

    L. Torrisi, L. Calcagno, M. Cutroneo, J. Badziak, M.Rosinski, A.Zaras-Szydlowska,andA.Torrisi,Nanos- tructured targets for TNSA laser ion acceleration, Nuk- leonika61, 103 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    Bagchi, P

    S. Bagchi, P. Prem Kiran, W.-M. Wang, Z. Sheng, M. Bhuyan, M. Krishnamurthy, and G. Ravindra Kumar, Surface-plasmon-enhanced MeV ions from femtosecond laser irradiated, periodically modulated surfaces, Physics of Plasmas19, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3693388 (2012)

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    Cristoforetti, P

    G. Cristoforetti, P. Londrillo, P. Singh, F. Baffigi, G. D’Arrigo, A. D. Lad, R. Milazzo, A. Adak, M. Shaikh, D. Sarkar,et al., Transition from coherent to stochastic electron heating in ultrashort relativistic laser interaction with structured targets, Scientific reports7, 14...

    2017

  45. [53]

    Dalui, W.-M

    M. Dalui, W.-M. Wang, T. M. Trivikram, S. Sarkar, S. Tata, J. Jha, P. Ayyub, Z. Sheng, and M. Krishna- murthy, Preferential enhancement of laser-driven carbon ion acceleration from optimized nanostructured surfaces, Scientific reports5, 11930 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Vallières, M

    S. Vallières, M. Barberio, M. Scisciò, E. d’Humières, and P. Antici, Enhanced laser-driven proton acceleration us- ing ultrasmall nanoparticles, Physical Review Accelera- tors and Beams22, 091303 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Ebert, N

    T. Ebert, N. W. Neumann, T. Abel, G. Schaumann, and M. Roth, Laser-induced microstructures on silicon for laser-driven acceleration experiments, High Power Laser Science and Engineering5, e13 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Vallières, M

    S. Vallières, M. Salvadori, A. Permogorov, G. Cantono, K. Svendsen, Z. Chen, S. Sun, F. Consoli, E. d’Humières, C.-G. Wahlström,et al., Enhanced laser-driven proton acceleration using nanowire targets, Scientific Reports 11, 2226 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Blanco, M

    M. Blanco, M. T. Flores-Arias, C. Ruiz, and M. Vranic, Table-top laser-based proton acceleration in nanostruc- tured targets, New Journal of Physics19, 033004 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Dozières, G

    M. Dozières, G. Petrov, P. Forestier-Colleoni, P. Camp- bell, K. Krushelnick, A. Maksimchuk, C. McGuffey, V. Kaymak, A. Pukhov, M. Capeluto,et al., Optimiza- tion of laser-nanowire target interaction to increase the proton acceleration efficiency, Plasma Physics and Con- troll...

    2019

  51. [59]

    G. A. Mourou, T. Tajima, and S. V. Bulanov, Optics in the relativistic regime, Reviews of modern physics78, 309 (2006)

    2006

  52. [60]

    Kiriyama, T

    H. Kiriyama, T. Shimomura, H. Sasao, Y. Nakai, M. Tanoue, S. Kondo, S. Kanazawa, A. S. Pirozhkov, M. Mori, Y. Fukuda,et al., Temporal contrast enhance- ment of petawatt-class laser pulses, Optics Letters37, 3363 (2012)

    2012

  53. [61]

    I. W. Choi, C. Jeon, S. G. Lee, S. Y. Kim, T. Y. Kim, I. J. Kim, H. W. Lee, J. Woo Yoon, J. H. Sung, S. K. Lee,et al., Highly efficient double plasma mirror produc- ingultrahigh-contrastmulti-petawattlaserpulses,Optics Letters45, 6342 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Tanaka, K

    K. Tanaka, K. Spohr, D. Balabanski, S. Balascuta, L. Capponi, M. Cernaianu, M. Cuciuc, A. Cucoanes, I. Dancus, A. Dhal,et al., Current status and highlights of the eli-np research program, Matter and Radiation at Extremes5, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093535 (2020)

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    Wilks, A

    S. Wilks, A. Langdon, T. Cowan, M. Roth, M. Singh, S. Hatchett, M. Key, D. Pennington, A. MacKinnon, and R. Snavely, Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser–solid interactions, Physics of plasmas8, 542 (2001)

    2001

  56. [64]

    Inoue, K

    S. Inoue, K. Maeda, S. Tokita, K. Mori, K. Teramoto, M. Hashida, and S. Sakabe, Single plasma mirror pro- viding 104 contrast enhancement and 70% reflectivity for intense femtosecond lasers, Applied Optics55, 5647 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Itatani, J

    J. Itatani, J. Faure, M. Nantel, G. Mourou, and S. Watanabe, Suppression of the amplified spontaneous emission in chirped-pulse-amplification lasers by clean high-energyseed-pulseinjection,OpticsCommunications 148, 70 (1998)

    1998

  58. [66]

    Wittmann, J.-P

    T. Wittmann, J.-P. Geindre, P. Audebert, R. Mar- joribanks, J.-P. Rousseau, F. Burgy, D. Douil- let, T. Lefrou, K. T. Phuoc, and J.-P. Cham- 11 baret, Towards ultrahigh-contrast ultraintense laser pulses—complete characterization of a double plasma- mirror pulse cleaner, Revie...

    2006 doi

  59. [67]

    I. B. Földes, B. Gilicze, Z. Kovács, and S. Szatmári, Plasma mirrors for cleaning laser pulses from the infrared to the ultraviolet, inEPJ Web of Conferences, Vol. 167 (EDP Sciences, 2018) p. 04001

    2018

  60. [68]

    P.Rajeev, P.Ayyub, S.Bagchi,andG.R.Kumar,Nanos- tructures, localfields, andenhancedabsorptioninintense light–matter interaction, Optics letters29, 2662 (2004)

    2004

  61. [69]

    Cernaianu, P

    M. Cernaianu, P. Ghenuche, F. Rotaru, L. Tudor, O. Chalus, C. Gheorghiu, D. Popescu, M. Gugiu, S. Bal- ascuta, A. Magureanu,et al., Commissioning of the 1 pw experimental area at eli-np using a short focal parabolic mirror for proton acceleration, Matter and Radiation at Extre...

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    Lureau, G

    F. Lureau, G. Matras, O. Chalus, C. Derycke, T. Mor- bieu, C. Radier, O. Casagrande, S. Laux, S. Ricaud, G. Rey,et al., High-energy hybrid femtosecond laser system demonstrating 2×10 pw capability, High Power Laser Science and Engineering8, e43 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Trebino and D

    R. Trebino and D. J. Kane, Using phase retrieval to measure the intensity and phase of ultrashort pulses: frequency-resolved optical gating, Journal of the Optical society of America A10, 1101 (1993)

    1993

  64. [72]

    Trebino, K

    R. Trebino, K. W. DeLong, D. N. Fittinghoff, J. N. Sweetser, M. A. Krumbügel, B. A. Richman, and D. J. Kane, Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time- frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gat- ing, Review of Scientific Instruments68, 3277 (1997)

    1997

  65. [73]

    J. J. Thomson, Xxvi. rays of positive electricity, The Lon- don, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science21, 225 (1911)

    1911

  66. [74]

    Slater, Thomson parabola ion analyzer for laser- plasma studies., The Review of Scientific Instruments49, 1493 (1978)

    D. Slater, Thomson parabola ion analyzer for laser- plasma studies., The Review of Scientific Instruments49, 1493 (1978)

    1978

  67. [75]

    Sakabe, T

    S. Sakabe, T. Mochizuki, T. Yamanaka, and C. Ya- manaka, Modified thomson parabola ion spectrometer of wide dynamic range, Review of Scientific Instruments51, 1314 (1980)

    1980

  68. [76]

    Treffert, Q

    F. Treffert, Q. Ji, P. Seidl, A. Persaud, B. Ludewigt, J. Barnard, A. Friedman, D. Grote, E. Gilson, I. Kaganovich,et al., Design and implementation of a thomson parabola for fluence dependent energy- loss measurements at the neutralized drift compres- sion experiment, Review ...

    2018 doi

  69. [77]

    D. Jung, R. Hörlein, D. Gautier, S. Letzring, D. Kiefer, K. Allinger, B. Albright, R. Shah, S. Palaniyappan, L. Yin,et al., A novel high resolution ion wide an- gle spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments82, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3575581 (2011)

    2011 doi

  70. [78]

    S. Tata, A. Mondal, S. Sarkar, A. D. Lad, and M. Krish- namurthy, A gated thomson parabola spectrometer for improved ion and neutral atom measurements in intense laser produced plasmas, Review of Scientific Instruments 88, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4998685 (2017)

    2017 doi

  71. [79]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on experimental method, RCF cal- ibration, simulation parameters and calculation of neu- tron flux

  72. [80]

    Cialfi,Advances in Target Normal Sheath Accelera- tion with Traditional and Nanostructured Targets, Ph.D

    L. Cialfi,Advances in Target Normal Sheath Accelera- tion with Traditional and Nanostructured Targets, Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Milano (2017), doctoral Program in Energy and Nuclear Science and Technology, Diparti- mento di Energia

    2017

  73. [81]

    Hegelich, S

    M. Hegelich, S. Karsch, G. Pretzler, D. Habs, K. Witte, W. Guenther, M. Allen, A. Blazevic, J. Fuchs, J. Gau- thier,et al., MeV ion jets from short-pulse-laser interac- tion with thin foils, Physical review letters89, 085002 (2002)

    2002

  74. [82]

    Borghesi, J

    M. Borghesi, J. Fuchs, S. Bulanov, A. Mackinnon, P. Pa- tel, and M. Roth, Fast ion generation by high-intensity laser irradiation of solid targets and applications, Fusion science and technology49, 412 (2006)

    2006

  75. [83]

    B. M. Hegelich, B. Albright, J. Cobble, K. Flippo, S. Let- zring, M. Paffett, H. Ruhl, J. Schreiber, R. Schulze, and J. Fernández, Laser acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic MeV ion beams, Nature439, 441 (2006)

    2006

  76. [84]

    Roth and M

    M. Roth and M. Schollmeier, Ion acceleration: TNSA, inLaser-Plasma Interactions and Applications(Springer,

  77. [85]

    Passoni, C

    M. Passoni, C. Perego, A. Sgattoni, and D. Batani, Advances in target normal sheath acceleration theory, Physics of Plasmas20, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812708 (2013)

    2013 doi

  78. [86]

    K. Zeil, S. Kraft, S. Bock, M. Bussmann, T. Cowan, T. Kluge, J. Metzkes, T. Richter, R. Sauerbrey, and U. Schramm, The scaling of proton energies in ultrashort pulse laser plasma acceleration, New Journal of Physics 12, 045015 (2010)

    2010

  79. [87]

    Vanderloo, M

    N. Vanderloo, M. Cufari, L. Russell, T. Johnson, J. Var- gas, B. Foo, B. Buschmann, S. Dannhoff, A. DeVault, T. Evans,et al., Image plate multi-scan response to fu- sion protons in the range of 1–14 mev, Review of Scien- tific Instruments95, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219547 (2024)

    2024 doi

  80. [90]

    García-Garduño, M

    O. García-Garduño, M. Mirón-Lozada, and J. Lárraga- Gutiérrez, Radiochromic film as a reference detector for field output factor determination in small photon field dosimetry, Radiation Measurements183, 107413 (2025)

    2025

  81. [91]

    V. D. Diaz-Martinez, M. Cyr, S. Devic, N. Tomic, D. F. Lewis, and S. A. Enger, Investigation of dosimetric char- acteristics of radiochromic film in response to alpha par- ticles emitted from americium-241, Medical Physics51, 6305 (2024)

    2024

  82. [92]

    C. C. Gheorghiu, S. C. Ionescu, P. Ghenuche, M. O. Cer- naianu, D. Doria, D. Popa, and V. Leca, Structuring free- standing foils for laser-driven particle acceleration exper- iments, Frontiers in Physics9, 515 (2021)

    2021

  83. [93]

    Masuda and K

    H. Masuda and K. Fukuda, Ordered metal nanohole ar- rays made by a two-step replication of honeycomb struc- tures of anodic alumina, Science268, 1466 (1995)

    1995

  84. [94]

    S. C. Ionescu, C. C. Gheorghiu, V. Lupu, M.-I. Zai, A. Magureanu, D. B. Dreghici, A. McCay, D. Molloy, H. Ahmed, M. Borghesi,et al., Highly ordered vertical 12 nickelnanotubesandnanowiresonthinsubstrateforhigh power lasers experiments, Discover Nano20, 219 (2025)

    2025

  85. [95]

    Zimmer, S

    M. Zimmer, S. Scheuren, T. Ebert, G. Schaumann, B. Schmitz, J. Hornung, V. Bagnoud, C. Rödel, and M. Roth, Analysis of laser-proton acceleration experi- ments for development of empirical scaling laws, Phys. Rev. E104, 045210 (2021)

    2021

  86. [96]

    Parab, J

    A. Parab, J. F. Ong, S. Ionescu, S. Dam, S. Ra- keeb, H. Habara, Y. Keita, R. Palit, D. Popa, D. Sangwan,et al., Bright, directional electron emis- sion from nanowire coated targets under petawatt, fem- tosecond irradiation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18668 https://doi.org/10.4...

    2026 doi arXiv

  87. [97]

    Tens of MeV, collimated, bright fluxes of protons from ordered nano-structured targets in ultra-relativistic laser-matter interaction

    A. Mančić, J. Robiche, P. Antici, P. Audebert, C. Blan- card, P. Combis, F. Dorchies, G. Faussurier, S. Four- maux, M. Harmand,et al., Isochoric heating of solids by laser-accelerated protons: Experimental characterization and self-consistent hydrodynamic modeling, High Energy...

    2010

  88. [98]

    K. A. Tanaka, T. Yabuuchi, T. Sato, R. Kodama, Y. Kitagawa, T. Takahashi, T. Ikeda, Y. Honda, and S. Okuda, Calibration of imaging plate for high energy electron spectrometer, Review of scientific instruments76, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1824371 (2005)

    2005 doi

  89. [99]

    Martin, H

    P. Martin, H. Ahmed, D. Doria, A. Alejo, R. Clarke, S. Ferguson, J. Fernández-Tobias, R. Freeman, J. Fuchs, A. Green,et al., Absolute calibration of Fujifilm BAS-TR image plate response to laser driven protons up to 40 MeV, Review of Scientific Instruments93, https://doi.org/1...

    2022 doi

  90. [100]

    Alejo, S

    A. Alejo, S. Kar, H. Ahmed, A. Krygier, D. Do- ria, R. Clarke, J. Fernandez, R. Freeman, J. Fuchs, A. Green,et al., Characterisation of deuterium spec- tra from laser driven multi-species sources by employ- ing differentially filtered image plate detectors in thom- son spectro...

    2014 doi

  91. [101]

    Fryxell, K

    B. Fryxell, K. Olson, P. Ricker, F. Timmes, M. Zingale, D. Lamb, P. MacNeice, R. Rosner, J. Truran, and H. Tufo, Flash: An adaptive mesh hydrodynamics code for model- ing astrophysical thermonuclear flashes, The Astrophysi- cal Journal Supplement Series131, 273 (2000)

    2000

  92. [102]

    E. G. Gamaly, A. V. Rode, B. Luther-Davies, and V. T. Tikhonchuk, Ablation of solids by femtosec- ond lasers: Ablation mechanism and ablation thresh- olds for metals and dielectrics, Physics of Plas- mas9, 949 (2002), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pop/article- pdf/9/3/949/19278465/...

    2002

  93. [103]

    E. G. Gamaly, A. V. Rode, O. Uteza, V. Kolev, B. Luther-Davies, T. Bauer, J. Koch, F. Korte, and B. N. Chichkov, Control over a phase state of the laser plume ablated by femtosecond laser: Spatial pulse shaping, Journal of Applied Physics 95, 2250 (2004), https://pubs.aip.org/...

    2004

  94. [104]

    J. F. Ong, flash2openpmd, https://github.com/ELI- NP/flash2openPMD.git (2022)

    2022

  95. [105]

    Burau, R

    H. Burau, R. Widera, W. Hönig, G. Juckeland, A. Debus, T. Kluge, U. Schramm, T. E. Cowan, R. Sauerbrey, and 5 M. Bussmann, PIConGPU: A fully relativistic particle-in- cell code for a GPU cluster, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science38, 2831 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.