Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

The dynamical surface of Phobos: a morphodynamic atlas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Most of Phobos's surface morphology and its red-blue spectral contrast can be explained as the long-term work of regolith moving along preferred tidal-gravity pathways.

desk verdict A genuinely useful first atlas of Phobos regolith pathways, honestly caveated, but the headline spectral/morphological link depends on a single low-friction threshold that the paper itself cannot justify. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10445 v2 pith:TNY5J6ZN submitted 2026-07-11 astro-ph.EP physics.comp-ph

Isabel Herreros , Sébastien Charnoz This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPphysics.comp-ph
keywords PhobosRegolithMigrationPathwaystidalforcingsurfaceaccelerationfieldspectralunitsMMXmissionmasswastingdynamicalslope
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Phobos's varied surface — smooth mantled patches, rough cratered terrain, and the red/blue spectral dichotomy — is largely the product of slow, long-lived migration of loose regolith along preferred routes set by the combined pull of Phobos's own gravity, Mars's tides, and centrifugal forces. Because the effective downhill direction differs from the topographic slope in this low-gravity environment, the authors compute surface trajectories directly from the acceleration field rather than from slope alone. The routes, called Regolith Migration Pathways, converge at specific sinks — the sub-Mars point and anti-Mars troughs — and their endpoints coincide with smooth, spectrally neutral, lightly cratered terrain. Rough, blue-spectral areas align with source regions stripped of regolith, while red, rough terrain appears dynamically quiet and old. If right, the model explains why Phobos looks the way it does and makes concrete predictions about what the upcoming MMX sample-return mission will collect at its two landing sites.

What carries the argument

The Regolith Migration Pathway (RMP) — a preferred transport route obtained by integrating surface-constrained trajectories under the local acceleration field with a Coulomb-type friction mobility threshold. The acceleration field includes self-gravity, Martian tides, centrifugal and Coriolis terms; the threshold is explored at 14° (low, revealing past or externally triggered transport) and 30° (high, conservative spontaneous case). The key move is projecting acceleration onto the local tangent plane and using it to route massless tracers, with friction treated as a mobility criterion rather than as a measured material property.

What would settle it

Measure or infer Phobos's effective regolith friction (for example, from MMX lander mechanics or by matching crater-density maps) and test whether predicted RMP endpoints are depleted in small craters. A null result — either an effective friction near 30°, or equal crater densities at endpoints and in quiet areas — would collapse the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a network of Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs) that connects Phobos's morphology to its dynamics. Simulating surface-constrained trajectories under self-gravity, tidal, centrifugal, and Coriolis accelerations with a Coulomb-type friction threshold of 14°, the paper finds that most of the surface is quiet but a sparse set of corridors channels material over kilometre scales. Trajectories from Stickney's eastern outer slope and mid-latitude terrain collect near the sub-Mars point; another dense cluster accumulates in the anti-Mars southern troughs. These termination zones are exactly where images show smooth, mantled, lightly cratered, spectrally neutral surfaces, whe

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a 14° effective friction/mobility threshold reveals the transport corridors that actually shaped Phobos; if the relevant effective resistance were instead close to 30°, the predicted pathways and all their correlations with smooth terrain and spectral units would largely disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The sub-Mars MMX sampling site is predicted to contain well-mixed, mature regolith fed from Stickney's outer slope and southern mid-latitudes, while the anti-Mars site is predicted to sample younger, less-weathered material from active troughs.
  • Smooth, spectrally neutral, lightly cratered terrain on Phobos marks depositional mantles formed by regolith accumulation along RMP endpoints; rough, blue-spectral terrain marks actively denuded source regions.
  • Red-spectral, rough terrain corresponds to dynamically quiet surfaces where negligible regolith motion has occurred, implying they are older and less frequently reworked.
  • The 30° result confines present-day spontaneous mobility to steep crater walls and Stickney's outer slope, identifying those as the most plausible sites of ongoing activity.
  • A future high-resolution crater-density map can independently test the model: endpoints should be depleted in small craters, and source regions enriched.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond Phobos, the same approach should reveal comparable transport corridors on any tidally locked small body whose mean slope is below its angle of repose; the effective-threshold method sidesteps unknown paleo-topography.
  • The correlation between RMPs and grooves along Stickney's outer slope suggests those grooves may be erosional records of long-term regolith migration rather than purely tectonic fractures — a connection the paper raises but leaves open.
  • If the true effective friction on Phobos turns out to be close to 30° rather than 14°, the geometric structure of the RMPs would persist but the interpretation of red/blue units as dynamical stratigraphy would need revision.
  • A testable extension: run the same trajectory model with a time-varying tidal field, including libration and past eccentricity, to see whether endpoint clustering sharpens or shifts — the paper notes libration is unmodeled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. Herreros and Charnoz use the RAVEL code to compute the surface acceleration field on a 36-m DTM of Phobos, integrate surface-constrained regolith trajectories under self-gravity, centrifugal, tidal, Coriolis and Coulomb friction, and define Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs) for two end-member friction angles (30° and 14°). They compare the 14° network with HRSC/HiRISE images and spectral slope maps, reporting qualitative agreement between RMP termini and smooth, spectrally neutral terrains, and between denuded/rough terrains and blue/red units. They interpret the sub-Mars and anti-Mars sites as distinct source/sink regions and use this to frame MMX sample provenance.

Significance. The paper is the first global dynamical transport-atlas calculation for Phobos and provides a falsifiable framework for MMX sample interpretation. Strengths include a clearly documented acceleration model with explicit treatment of tides and eccentricity, sensitivity checks on eccentricity and detachment, and a candid discussion of limitations. The main value is the proposed source-to-sink architecture, which can be tested with MMX data. However, as argued below, the central causal claim currently rests on a single low-friction threshold and on qualitative visual correlations, so the result is promising rather than established.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, §5.1.2, App. B.3] The load-bearing threshold choice is not defended against the static/dynamic split. The governing equations (Eq. B.5 and B.6 in App. B) distinguish φ_static and φ_dynamic and explicitly note that dynamic friction is commonly lower than static (App. B.3), yet the 14° case sets φ_static=φ_dynamic=14° (§5.1.2). This means trajectories initiate wherever the present-day dynamical slope exceeds the mean slope (~14°). The paper’s own statement that it does not predict triggering (§1, §4) is in tension with this initiation rule. The skeptic’s scenario—static ≈30° (as in §5.1.1, from [22]) with dynamic ≈14°—would restrict initiation to steep walls and likely erase the RMP correlations. Because the abstract’s causal claim is supported only by the 14° case (§6), please test this split and report whether the correlations survive; if not, the interpretation should be reframed as a diagnostic atlas ra
  2. [§5.2, Fig. 12] The claimed correlations are qualitative and not quantitatively validated. Sections 5.2.1–5.2.4 rely on visual inspection ('remarkably well', 'good qualitative agreement'), and Fig. 12 compares endpoint clusters with the Basilevsky feature map using different projections without a statistical overlap test. The paper admits (§6) that correlations are reproduced only for φ=14°, but no null or control test is provided (e.g., random endpoints, φ=30° endpoints, or neighboring thresholds). Please add a quantitative metric—endpoint density vs smooth/crater-poor/neutral units, with significance relative to random distributions—and a threshold sweep around 14° to establish that the network is not an artifact of choosing a threshold equal to the mean slope.
  3. [§6.1, §5.2.3, §5.2.4] The spectral-interpretation claim ('dynamical stratigraphy') exceeds the available evidence. High-resolution spectral data are absent for the anti-Mars region (§5.2.3) and the South Pole correlation is explicitly weak (§5.2.4); moreover, the model cannot distinguish composition from maturity. The manuscript should either soften the claim that 'much of Phobos' surface morphology and spectral heterogeneity can be explained by long-term regolith redistribution' or provide a more explicit mapping of where the correlation is and is not tested.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2] Add axis labels and units; the mean-slope line is useful but the histogram coordinates should be self-contained.
  2. [App. C.1.4] The weights w1=w2=w3=0.33 are chosen without sensitivity analysis; state that the mobility index is not used in the main RMP calculation, to avoid overinterpretation.
  3. [App. D] The normal coefficient of restitution is fixed at 0.1; a short sensitivity note would help.
  4. [§1, App. B.4] The phrase 'the model does not aim to predict triggering' should be reconciled with the θ>φ_static initiation rule; consider renaming φ_static to 'initiation threshold' and clarifying that it is a modeling parameter, not a physical static friction angle.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: RMPs derive from independent force-field/topography inputs; the 14° threshold is an acknowledged modeling end-member, not a parameter fitted to the observed correlations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular by construction. RMPs are computed from the surface acceleration field (self-gravity, centrifugal, tidal, Coriolis) on a 36 m DTM, using a Coulomb mobility threshold (Appendix B). The observed smooth terrains, crater densities, and red/blue spectral units are external datasets (HiRISE, HRSC, spectral slope maps, Basilevsky et al. 2014) and are not used as inputs to the trajectory calculation. The friction angle is not fitted to these observables: the paper states it explored a suite of friction angles (14°, 20°, 25°, 30°, 35°) and found that trajectory geometry stays consistent while lengths decrease with friction, and it presents 14° as a low end-member close to the mean dynamical slope, not as a measured material property. The central comparison is therefore a posteriori consistency testing, not a renamed fit. The paper explicitly disclaims that the model predicts triggering: 'The model does not aim to predict the triggering of slope failure. Instead, it addresses where material would preferentially move once motion is initiated.' This removes the most obvious circularity. The acknowledged limitation that correlations are reproduced mainly for φ=14°, while the φ=30° case shows no such correspondence, is a model-selection/robustness concern rather than a definitional reduction: the RMP geometry is not logically forced to match the observed units by the choice of threshold. No load-bearing self-citation chain appears; RAVEL is described in the appendices, and external constraints such as Robin et al. (2024) and Ballouz et al. (2019) are used for context. The paper also acknowledges the paleotopography feedback (progressive infill reduces slopes) and frames its low-threshold case as a late-stage pathway-revealing end-member, which is an honest equifinality caveat rather than a circular derivation. Overall, no step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard rigid-body/orbital mechanics plus a Coulomb mobility law. The main unconstrained input is the effective friction angle, which acts as a threshold controlling where trajectories can start and stop; the paper explores a suite and bases its headline correlations on the 14° case. Additional assumptions (homogeneous interior, no libration, surface-constrained motion, present-day topography as proxy for past transport) are stated and partially tested. No new physical entities are postulated; RMPs are derived from the model.

free parameters (3)
  • Effective friction angle φ (low/high end-members) = 14°, 30°; 20°, 25°, 35° also explored
    Mobility-threshold criterion controlling where trajectories start and stop. Only φ=14° reproduces the spectral/morphological correlations on which the central claim rests; value chosen close to Phobos' mean dynamical slope, not independently measured for Phobos regolith.
  • Mobility index weights w1, w2, w3 = 0.33 each
    Equal-weight linear combination in the a-priori mobility index (Eq. C.9). Arbitrary and not central to the RMP trajectories, but used in the Appendix C mobility maps.
  • Normal coefficient of restitution = 0.1
    Controls reattachment after ballistic excursions in detachment-allowed simulations (Appendix D); not varied in sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Homogeneous interior and uniform mascon gravity
    Appendix A: 10^6 equal-mass particles uniformly distributed in the volume; authors note this is less accurate than the polyhedral method for homogeneous bodies and that it does not replace a realistic internal-structure sensitivity study.
  • domain assumption Synchronous rotation; libration neglected
    Section 2: rotation rate equal to mean motion; libration amplitude of 1.14° omitted. Authors argue the first-order influence is limited and leave a dedicated assessment to future work.
  • domain assumption Coulomb friction with static=dynamic for end-members and no cohesion
    Appendix B: F_fric = -tan(φ_dynamic) R u; end-member runs set φ_static = φ_dynamic. Cohesion, adhesion, inter-grain friction, rolling, and collisions are excluded by design.
  • domain assumption Surface-constrained motion (no detachment) for main RMPs
    Appendix B.5: velocity is projected onto the local tangent plane at every step. Validity is checked in Appendix D with a 0.1 coefficient of restitution, showing only minor localized differences.
  • domain assumption Present-day topography used as proxy for past transport
    Section 6.3: paleotopography is unconstrained, so the low-threshold case is intended to represent past or transient conditions within the current shape; the authors explicitly avoid reconstructing ancient topography.
  • domain assumption Motion initiation only where dynamical slope exceeds static friction; triggering not modeled
    Appendix B.4: trajectories start from rest and only where θ > φ_static. Impacts, seismic shaking, thermal stresses, and other triggers are not simulated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The dynamical surface of Phobos: a morphodynamic atlas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TNY5J6ZN

@misc{pith2026260710445,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The dynamical surface of Phobos: a morphodynamic atlas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TNY5J6ZN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10445}
}
read the original abstract

Phobos evolves in a highly dynamical environment where surface-material motion is controlled by the combined effects of self-gravity, time-dependent Martian tides, and inertial forces. In such a low-gravity regime, the displacement of loose material, cannot be inferred from topographic slope alone, making a dynamical approach essential for interpreting Phobos' surface morphology and for supporting the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission led by JAXA. Here, using our RAVEL code, we apply a dynamical model that combines the surface acceleration field with friction on a digital terrain model of Phobos to compute surface regolith trajectories. The model does not aim to predict the triggering of slope failure. Instead, it addresses where material would preferentially move once motion is initiated. This reveals large scale coherent dynamical regions and a sparse network of preferred regolith transport routes, termed here Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs). The final positions of the RMPs correlate with smooth, low-relief terrains and spectrally neutral units, consistent with depositional mantles formed by long-term regolith infill, whereas rough, high-standing areas with abundant small craters and blue spectral slopes tend to correspond to dynamically active or denuded source regions. In contrast, spectrally red terrains are generally associated with dynamically quiet, morphologically rough surfaces where our model predicts negligible regolith motion, suggesting older, less frequently reworked units. Taken together, these patterns indicate that much of Phobos' surface morphology and spectral heterogeneity can be explained by long-term regolith redistribution driven by the surface acceleration field along RMPs. We provide a 3D morphodynamic atlas of RMPs across Phobos' surface, which will be useful for constraining the geographical provenance of samples to be collected by the MMX spacecraft.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10445 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Surface acceleration map of Phobos. The colors represent the local dynamical slope (color bar on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Surface acceleration map of Phobos. The colors represent the local dynamical slope (color bar on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Histogram of slope distribution at the surface of Phobos. The mean slope is 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Surface trajectories simulated for ϕ = 30◦, projected on Phobos’ global topography (equatorial views). Black lines highlight the Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs), defined as preferred routes of regolith transport under the combined effects of self-gravity, centrifuga…
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Surface trajectories simulated for ϕ = 30◦, projected on Phobos’ global topography (equatorial views). Black lines highlight the Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs), defined as preferred routes of regolith transport under the combined effects of self-gravity, centrifuga…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface trajectories simulated for ϕ = 30◦, projected on Phobos’ global topography (equatorial views). Black lines highlight the Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs), defined as preferred routes of regolith transport under the combined effects of self-gravity, centrifuga…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface trajectories simulated for ϕ = 30◦, projected on Phobos’ global topography (equatorial views). Black lines highlight the Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs), defined as preferred routes of regolith transport under the combined effects of self-gravity, centrifuga…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Surface trajectories simulated for ϕ = 14◦, projected on Phobos’ global topography (equatorial views). Black lines highlight the RMPs, i.e. preferred routes of regolith transport, under the combined effects of self-gravity, centrifugal, and tidal accelerations. These p…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated regolith trajectories at the north and south poles of Phobos for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Phobos nearside as observed by the MRO/HiRISE instrument in a three-color composite image [15]. Middle: 3D visualization of Phobos’ dynamical surface. Black lines indicate Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs) computed for ϕ = 14◦; white arrows show acceleration vect…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Phobos nearside as observed by the MRO/HiRISE instrument in a three-color composite image [27]. Middle: 3D visualization of Phobos’ dynamical surface. Black lines indicate Regolith Migration Pathways (RMPs) computed for ϕ = 14◦; white arrows show acceleration vect…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Zoom on the sub-Mars low region. Letters a to g mark topographic features used as control points to aid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Zoom on the sub-Mars low region. Letters a to h mark topographic features used as control points to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of Mars Express/HRSC image and spectral slope of the northern polar region of Phobos with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: This panel of images present a detailed analysis of the anti-mars region. Letters correspond to topographic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: This set of images presents a detailed analysis of the southern regions of Phobos (near point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: This set of images presents a detailed analysis of the southern regions of Phobos (near point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison between modeled regolith accumulation zones and observed mass-wasting features on Phobos. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison between modeled regolith accumulation zones and observed mass-wasting features on Phobos. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    Robin, C.Q., Duchêne, A., Murdoch, N., etal., 2024.Mechanicalpropertiesofrubblepileaster- oids (dimorphos, itokawa, ryugu, and bennu) through surface boulder morphological analysis. Nat. Commun. 15, 6203. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50147-w

    doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50147-w 2024

  2. [1]

    T., Kawakatsu, Y., Fujimoto, M., 2019

    Ballouz, R.-L., Baresi, N., Crites, S. T., Kawakatsu, Y., Fujimoto, M., 2019. Surface refreshing of martian moon phobos by orbital eccentricity-driven grain motion. Nat. Geosci. 12, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0323-9

    doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0323-9 2019

  3. [2]

    S., Daly, M

    Barnouin, O. S., Daly, M. G., Palmer, E. E., et al., 2019. Shape of (101955) bennu indicative of a rubble pile with internal stiffness. Nat. Geosci. 12, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561- 019-0330-x 26 ACCEPTED by Earth and Planetary Science Letters, July 2026

    work page doi:10.1038/s41561- 2019

  4. [3]

    T., Lorenz, C

    Basilevsky, A. T., Lorenz, C. A., Shingareva, T. V., Head, J. W., Ramsley, K. R., Zubarev, A. E., 2014. The surface geology and geomorphology of phobos. Planet. Space Sci. 102, 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2014.04.013

    doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.04.013 2014

  5. [4]

    Effect of friction on the angle of repose of elongated particles

    Cárdenas-Barrantes, M., Ovalle, C., 2025. Effect of friction on the angle of repose of elongated particles. Powder Technol. 458, 120974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.120974

    arXiv 2025

  6. [5]

    D., Olhoeft, G

    Carrier, W. D., Olhoeft, G. R., Mendell, W., 1991. Physical properties of the lunar surface. In: Heiken, G. H., Vaniman, D. T., French, B. M. (Eds.), Lunar Sourcebook. Cambridge University Press, pp. 475–594

    1991

  7. [6]

    M., Daly, R

    Ernst, C. M., Daly, R. T., Gaskell, R. W., Barnouin, O. S., Nair, H., Hyatt, B. A., Al Asad, M. M., Hoch, K. K. W., 2023. High-resolution shape models of phobos and deimos from stereophotoclinometry. Earth Planets Space 75, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-023- 01814-7

    work page doi:10.1186/s40623-023- 2023

  8. [7]

    H., Tirsch, D., Matz, K.-D., Doressoundiram, A., Gautier, T., Barucci, M

    Fornasier, S., Wargnier, A., Hasselmann, P. H., Tirsch, D., Matz, K.-D., Doressoundiram, A., Gautier, T., Barucci, M. A., 2024. Phobos photometric properties from mars express HRSC observations. Astron. Astrophys. 686 (A203). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449220

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449220 2024

Show all 35 references
  1. [8]

    A., Arvidson, R

    Fraeman, A. A., Arvidson, R. E., Murchie, S. L., Rivkin, A. S., 2012. Analysis of disk-resolved OMEGA and CRISM spectral observations of phobos and deimos. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117, E00J15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JE004137

    2012 doi

  2. [9]

    A., Murchie, S

    Fraeman, A. A., Murchie, S. L., Arvidson, R. E., et al., 2014. Spectral absorptions on pho- bos and deimos in the visible/near infrared wavelengths and their compositional constraints. ICARUS 229, 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2013.11.021

    2014 doi

  3. [10]

    A., Lainey, V., 2014

    Jacobson, R. A., Lainey, V., 2014. Martian satellite orbits and ephemerides. Planet. Space Sci. 102, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.06.003

    2014 doi

  4. [11]

    C., Campbell, C

    Johnson, B. C., Campbell, C. S., Melosh, H. J., 2016. The reduction of friction in long runout landslides as an emergent phenomenon. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 121 (5), 881–

    2016

  5. [12]

    P., Oberst, J., Zubarev, A

    Karachevtseva, I. P., Oberst, J., Zubarev, A. E., Nadezhdina, I. E., Kokhanov, A. A., Garov, A. S., Uchaev, D. V., Uchaev, Dm. V., Malinnikov, V. A., Klimkin, N. D., 2014. The phobos information system. Planet. Space Sci. 102, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.12.015

    2014 doi

  6. [13]

    Signature of Phobos’ interior structure in its gravity field and libration

    Le Maistre, S., Rivoldini, A., Rosenblatt, P., 2019. Signature of Phobos’ interior structure in its gravity field and libration. ICARUS 321, 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2018.11.022

    2019 doi

  7. [14]

    C., Dehant, V., Marty, J.-C.,

    Le Maistre, S., Rosenblatt, P., Rambaux, N., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., Dehant, V., Marty, J.-C.,

  8. [15]

    Dynamics of long-runout landslides: a review

    Lei, Z., Mao, W., Yu, F., 2025. Dynamics of long-runout landslides: a review. Appl. Sci. 15 (21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111300

    2025 doi

  9. [16]

    P., 2014

    Lucas, A., Mangeney, A., Ampuero, J. P., 2014. Frictional velocity-weakening in landslides on Earth and on other planetary bodies. Nat. Commun. 5, 3417. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4417 27 ACCEPTED by Earth and Planetary Science Letters, July 2026

    2014 doi

  10. [17]

    K., Scott, R

    Mitchell, J. K., Scott, R. F., Houston, W. N., et al., 1972. Mechanical properties of lunar soil: density, porosity, cohesion, and angle of internal friction. In: Proceedings of the Lunar Science Conference. Vol. 3, pp. 3235–3253

    1972

  11. [18]

    Surface environment of phobos and phobos simulant UTPS

    Miyamoto, H., Niihara, T., Wada, K., Ogawa, K., Senshu, H., Michel, P., et al., 2021. Surface environment of phobos and phobos simulant UTPS. Earth Planets Space 73, 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01406-3

    2021 doi

  12. [19]

    Rotational motion of phobos

    Rambaux, N., Castillo-Rogez, J.-C., Le Maistre, S., Rosenblatt, P., 2012. Rotational motion of phobos. Astron. Astrophys. 548, A14. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219710

    2012 doi

  13. [20]

    R., Head, J

    Ramsley, K. R., Head, J. W., 2019. Origin of phobos grooves: testing the stickney crater ejecta model. Planet. Space Sci. 165, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2018.11.004

    2019 doi

  14. [21]

    R., Head, J

    Ramsley, K. R., Head, J. W., 2021. The origins and geological histories of deimos and phobos: hypotheses and open questions. Space Sci. Rev. 217 (86). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021- 00864-1

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Inte- grated method for crater detection from topography and optical images and the new PH9224GT catalogue of Phobos impact craters

    Salamunićcar, G., Lončarić, S., Pina, P., Bandeira, L., Saraiva, J., 2014. Inte- grated method for crater detection from topography and optical images and the new PH9224GT catalogue of Phobos impact craters. Adv. Space Res. 53 (12), 1798–1809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.006

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    J., Hartzell, C

    Scheeres, D. J., Hartzell, C. M., Sánchez, P., Swift, M., 2010. Scaling forces to asteroid surfaces: the role of cohesion. ICARUS 210 (2), 968–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.009

    2010 doi

  17. [25]

    Evolution of phobos’ orbit, tidal forces, dynamical topography, and related surface modification processes

    Shi, X., Willner, K., Oberst, J., 2013. Evolution of phobos’ orbit, tidal forces, dynamical topography, and related surface modification processes. In: 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Abstract 1889

    2013

  18. [26]

    Mapping the thermal inertia of phobos using MGS-TES observations and thermophysical modeling

    Smith, N., Edwards, C., Mommert, M., Trilling, D., Glotch, T., 2018. Mapping the thermal inertia of phobos using MGS-TES observations and thermophysical modeling. In: Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Vol. 49. LPI Contribution No. 2083

    2018

  19. [27]

    T., Herkenhoff, K

    Thomas, N., Stelter, R., Ivanov, A., Bridges, N. T., Herkenhoff, K. E., McEwen, A. S., 2011. Spectral heterogeneity on phobos and deimos: HiRISE observations and comparisons to mars pathfinder results. Planet. Space Sci. 59 (13), 1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2010.04.018

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    The surfaces of phobos and deimos

    Veverka, J., 1978. The surfaces of phobos and deimos. Vistas Astron. 22 (2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0083-6656(78)90014-4

    1978 doi

  21. [29]

    A new topographic image atlas of phobos

    Wählisch, M., Willner, K., Oberst, J., Matz, K.-D., Scholten, F., Roatsch, T., Hoffmann, H., Semm, S., Neukum, G., 2010. A new topographic image atlas of phobos. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294, 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009.11.003 28 ACCEPTED by Earth and Planetar...

    2010 doi

  22. [32]

    For each starting pointi, we consider the endpoints of the pericenter and apocenter trajecto- ries

  23. [33]

    If two distinct endpoints exist, we define their mutual separation in 3D, dee =∥e 1 −e 2∥.(C.10)

  24. [34]

    We compute the start–to–endpoint distances, d1 =∥e 1 −p 0∥, d 2 =∥e 2 −p 0∥,(C.11) and their mean dse = 1 2 (d1 +d 2).(C.12)

    Letp 0 be the initial position. We compute the start–to–endpoint distances, d1 =∥e 1 −p 0∥, d 2 =∥e 2 −p 0∥,(C.11) and their mean dse = 1 2 (d1 +d 2).(C.12)

  25. [35]

    When evaluated with the paired pericenter/apocenter trajectories, the eccentricity–effect index exhibits a broad, strongly right-skewed distribution

    The eccentricity–effect index is then defined as the dimensionless ratio Ei = dee dse ≤2,(C.13) with an additional safeguard: starting points withdse below a small tolerance are treated as immobile and are omitted from this analysis. When evaluated with the paired pericenter/a...

    2026

  26. [889]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JF003751

    doi

  27. [2013]

    Phobos interior from librations determination using Doppler and star tracker measure- ments. Planet. Space Sci. 85, 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2013.06.015

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.