Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 41 references

An extra coupling between the trapping field and the heat bath makes a charged magneto-oscillator lose quantum coherence faster.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Field-bath coupling (parameter λ) renormalizes the memory kernel and spring constant of a charged magneto-oscillator, enhancing its decoherence rate relative to the λ=0 case.

T0 review reviewed 2026-07-14 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid incremental extension of CMO decoherence that cleanly adds a classical field-bath term and shows λ-enhanced decay under controlled approximations; useful for reservoir engineering, not a foundational rewrite. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.11137 v1 pith:3SHJCI7N submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph

Decoherence of a quantum magneto-oscillator: Effect of field-bath interaction

Koushik Mandal , Suraka Bhattacharjee , Supurna Sinha This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantum magneto-oscillatorfield-bath interactiondecoherencegeneralized quantum Langevin equationnon-Markovian master equationreservoir engineeringfluctuation-dissipation theorem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a charged particle trapped in a harmonic potential and a magnetic field while it is weakly coupled to a thermal bath of oscillators. The authors add a tunable field–bath interaction, so the same confining potential that holds the particle also acts on the bath oscillators themselves. This single change renormalizes the effective spring constant, the memory kernel, and the random-force correlations that appear in the generalized quantum Langevin equation. Solving the associated non-Markovian master equation then shows that the off-diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix decay faster as the field–bath coupling strength is increased. The same enhancement appears in the damping of the position and velocity correlation functions, which are experimentally measurable. The result supplies a concrete handle—reservoir engineering via the confining field—for controlling how quickly a magneto-oscillator becomes classical.

Core claim

When an external harmonic trap is allowed to interact with the bath oscillators through a tunable coupling λ, the resulting modification of the noise kernel and of the effective oscillator frequency increases the decoherence rate of a charged magneto-oscillator; the off-diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix therefore decay more rapidly with larger λ.

What carries the argument

The generalized quantum Langevin equation whose memory kernel, random-force correlator and effective spring constant Ω₀ are all renormalized by the field–bath parameter λ; the associated non-Markovian master equation then yields an explicit decoherence factor Γ(t) that grows with λ.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic expressions and plots rely on taking the field–bath coupling large while still treating the system–bath interaction as weak and the bath spectrum as Ohmic with a sharp frequency cutoff.

What would settle it

In a Penning-trap ion cloud cooled by optical molasses, measure the Ramsey-visibility decay of off-diagonal coherences while systematically varying the feedback strength that implements λ; if the decoherence rate does not increase with that strength at fixed temperature and trap frequency, the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Decoherence of a magneto-oscillator can be accelerated or slowed by engineering how strongly the confining potential couples to the bath.
  • Position, position–velocity and velocity autocorrelation functions become experimentally tunable signatures of the field–bath interaction strength.
  • Reservoir engineering via external control fields becomes a practical route for shaping irreversible quantum dynamics in hybrid ion–atom platforms.
  • The quantum-to-classical transition of a charged particle in a magnetic field is no longer fixed solely by temperature and cyclotron frequency; it also depends on the field–bath coupling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same λ-renormalization mechanism should alter heating rates and information back-flow measures in non-Markovian magneto-oscillators.
  • If the large-λ restriction can be relaxed, intermediate coupling strengths may reveal non-monotonic decoherence windows useful for coherence protection.
  • Feedback-controlled optical molasses already used in ion traps could implement the proposed λ tuning without new hardware.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quantum dissipative dynamics of a charged magneto-oscillator (CMO) linearly coupled to a harmonic-oscillator bath, augmented by an additional field-bath interaction Hamiltonian HP = ∑j (λ/2) M ω0^{2} qj^{2}. Starting from the microscopic Hamiltonian, the authors derive a generalized quantum Langevin equation in which the memory kernel, random-force correlator and effective spring constant Ωo are all renormalized by λ (Eqs. 17–20). They obtain the corresponding fluctuation-dissipation relation (Eqs. 22–23), explicit position, position-velocity and velocity autocorrelation functions, and a non-Markovian Born master equation whose decoherence rate Γ(t) depends on λ through both the noise kernel ν(τ) and the free-evolution functions F1(τ) that contain Ωo(λ). Numerical plots for large λ show faster damping of the correlators and faster decay of the off-diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix with increasing λ or ω0. An experimental proposal based on a Penning-trap ion cloud cooled by optical molasses is sketched.

Significance. If the claimed enhancement of decoherence by field-bath coupling survives beyond the large-λ continuum limit, the work supplies a concrete microscopic mechanism for reservoir engineering of a magneto-oscillator—an experimentally relevant platform for quantum technologies. The derivations of the modified QLE, FDT and correlators are explicit and falsifiable; the experimental outline (trap frequencies, laser cooling, Ramsey interferometry) gives a clear route to test the λ-dependence. The paper therefore extends the authors’ earlier CMO studies and the classical field-bath literature in a direction that is of genuine interest to open-quantum-system and quantum-control communities.

major comments (3)
  1. After Eq. (20) and throughout Appendix A the authors explicitly restrict the analytic treatment (noise kernel Eq. (23), Γ(t), and all subsequent plots) to the large-λ and M ≫ mj continuum Ohmic limit with a sharp cutoff Λ. In that regime both the prefactor of ν(τ) and the renormalized frequency Ωo that enters F1(τ) grow with λ, producing the monotonic enhancement of decoherence shown in Fig. 4. No calculation or argument is given that the same monotonicity persists for moderate λ (where the discrete sum over bath modes must be retained) or for a smooth spectral density. Because the central claim of the abstract and §6 rests on this enhancement, the restriction must either be lifted or its necessity for the claimed effect must be demonstrated.
  2. The non-Markovian master equation (Eqs. 34–48) is derived under the Born weak-coupling approximation, yet the analytic expressions and the plots that support the central claim are obtained only after taking λ large. The two limits are not shown to be simultaneously consistent; if large λ drives the system out of the weak-coupling regime, the master-equation description of Γ(t) ceases to be controlled. A quantitative estimate of the range of λ for which the Born approximation remains valid is required.
  3. Section 7 proposes that the field-bath interaction can be realized by a “suitable feedback mechanism” between the harmonic trap and the optical molasses, but supplies no concrete protocol, Hamiltonian, or control sequence that would generate the term HP. Without such a mapping the experimental proposal cannot test the specific λ-dependence predicted by the theory.
minor comments (5)
  1. The date on the title page is “July 14, 2026”; this is presumably a typographical error.
  2. Notation for the cyclotron frequency is introduced as ωc = eB/Mc only in Appendix B; it should be defined at first appearance in the main text (Eq. 17).
  3. Figs. 1–3 caption the same set of parameters twice (once for each panel); a single caption with panel labels would improve readability.
  4. In Eq. (23) the factor coth(√λ m̃ ω0 / Ω) is pulled outside the frequency integral; a brief remark that this is valid only after the large-λ approximation would help the reader.
  5. Several self-citations to the authors’ prior CMO papers are listed as [8–14]; a short sentence clarifying which technical ingredients are new versus recycled would aid the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: λ-dependence of decoherence follows from the extended Hamiltonian and stated large-λ continuum limit; self-citations supply background CMO techniques only.

full rationale

The derivation begins from the microscopic Hamiltonian (1)–(5) that explicitly adds the field-bath term HP = ∑ (λ/2) M ω0^{2} qj^{2}. The QLE (17), memory kernel (18), effective frequency Ωo(λ) (20), force correlator (22)–(23), and decoherence rate Γ(t) (48) are obtained by direct elimination of bath degrees of freedom and continuum/Ohmic approximations that are stated after Eq. (20) and in Appendix A. λ remains a free input parameter; no data fit is performed and no quantity is redefined in terms of the claimed enhancement. Self-citations to the authors’ earlier CMO papers supply the position-coupling and master-equation machinery used for the λ = 0 baseline, but the new λ-dependence is generated by the added HP term and is not forced by those citations. The conventional identification of an Ohmic spectral density with constant γ is a modeling choice, not a definitional loop. The large-λ restriction is an explicit tractability assumption, not a circular reduction of the central claim to its inputs. Consequently the paper’s derivation chain is self-contained against its own premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard Caldeira-Leggett-type Hamiltonian augmented by one new bilinear field-bath term controlled by λ, plus the usual Born weak-coupling and continuum Ohmic-bath assumptions. No free parameters are fitted to external data; λ, γ, ω0, ωc are free inputs whose effects are scanned. The only invented entity is the field-bath interaction itself, introduced by analogy with classical MD observations rather than derived from a more microscopic model.

free parameters (3)
  • λ (field-bath coupling strength)
    Dimensionless tuning parameter introduced by hand in HP; scanned over values 10 and 100 in plots; not fitted to any external measurement.
  • γ (Ohmic dissipation constant) = 1 (in natural units)
    Set to 1 in all numerical plots; defines the memory kernel μ(ω)=Mγ for ω≤Λ; free model parameter.
  • Λ (bath cutoff frequency)
    Abrupt ultraviolet cutoff of the Ohmic spectral density; appears in the closed-form noise correlator but is never assigned a numerical value in the figures.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Born weak-coupling approximation remains valid for the non-Markovian master equation (ρSE(t)≈ρS(t)⊗ρE).
    Stated explicitly in §5; required to close the master equation at second order in the system-bath coupling.
  • domain assumption Bath spectral density is Ohmic with sharp cutoff: μ(ω)=Mγ for 0<ω≤Λ.
    Used to obtain the closed-form noise correlator Eq. (23); standard but non-universal modeling choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Large-λ and M≫mj limits permit the simplified noise correlator and analytic progress.
    Invoked after Eq. (20) and in Appendix A; without these limits the integrals remain unevaluated and the claimed monotonic enhancement is not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption Position-position bilinear coupling plus the additional harmonic field-bath term fully capture the relevant system-environment interaction.
    Hamiltonian Eqs. (1)–(5); motivated by classical MD but not derived from a more microscopic electronic-structure calculation.
invented entities (1)
  • Field-bath interaction Hamiltonian HP = ∑j (λ/2) M ω0^{2} qj^{2} no independent evidence
    purpose: Encodes the influence of the external confining potential on the bath oscillators, thereby renormalizing the memory kernel and effective spring constant.
    Introduced by direct analogy with classical Brownian-motion models; no independent microscopic derivation or external experimental confirmation is supplied inside the paper.

reviewed 2026-07-14 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decoherence of a quantum magneto-oscillator: Effect of field-bath interaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3SHJCI7N

@misc{pith2026260711137,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decoherence of a quantum magneto-oscillator: Effect of field-bath interaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3SHJCI7N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11137}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum dissipative dynamics of a charged magneto-oscillator(CMO) coupled to a heat bath of harmonic oscillators in the presence of an additional field-bath interaction. The problem is formulated within the framework of the generalized quantum Langevin equation, where the external confining potential modifies the random force correlations and the memory kernel of the environment, and the effective spring constant. Using the corresponding non-Markovian master equation, we examine the influence of the field-bath coupling on the temporal decay of the reduced density matrix of the system. We show that the additional interaction leads to an enhancement of the decoherence rate by altering the dissipative response of the bath. Thus our results shed light on the role of field-bath coupling in the quantum to classical transition of a CMO. The resulting fluctuation-dissipation relation is analyzed, and the position autocorrelation, position-velocity correlation and velocity autocorrelation are obtained explicitly. The dependence of these experimentally accessible quantities on the field-bath coupling parameter is discussed. We outline an experimental proposal for testing our theoretical predictions. The study sheds light on reservoir engineering which is central to quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11137 by Koushik Mandal, Supurna Sinha, Suraka Bhattacharjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The position auto-correlation function versus time for different values of harmonic fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The position-velocity correlation function versus time for different values of harmonic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The velocity auto-correlation function versus time for different values of harmonic frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The reduced density matrix ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    INTRODUCTION The study of quantum Brownian motion (QBM) is central to modern quantum statis- tical physics, providing a fundamental frame- work for understanding how microscopic quan- tum systems interact with their environments [1–7]. While classical Brownian motion describes the dynamics of particles coupled to a ther- mal bath, its quantum analogue cap...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    This system is subjected to an external magnetic field ⃗Balong thez-axis

    QUANTUM LANGEVIN EQUA TION We consider a charged quantum Brownian particle of massMand chargeecoupled to a bath ofN-harmonic oscillators at an arbitrary temperatureT. This system is subjected to an external magnetic field ⃗Balong thez-axis. Thus the motion of the charged particle is confined to the two-dimensionalx−yplane. In addition, the Brownian partic...

  3. [3]

    As the heat bath is at a fixed temperatureTand is coupled to the CMO, we use a statistical average of the bath operators [26]

    FLUCTUA TION DISSIP A TION THEOREM Here we derive the FDT for the CMO which establishes a direct connection between the equi- librium fluctuations of the noise and the dissipa- tive properties of the bath. As the heat bath is at a fixed temperatureTand is coupled to the CMO, we use a statistical average of the bath operators [26]. Thus we have ⟨qjα(0)⟩= 0...

  4. [4]

    CORRELA TION FUNCTIONS The motion of the CMO is confined to the x−yplane as the applied magnetic field is di- rected along thez-axis. Now using the prop- erties of the random force, one can find the position auto-correlation function (forxandy coordinates), velocity auto-correlation and the position-velocity correlation along the lines out- lined in ref. ...

  5. [5]

    −2Ω 2 o −ω 2 c −ω c p 4Ω2o +ω 2c # 1 2 (41) B= 1 2

    NON-MARKOVIAN MASTER EQUA TION: DYNAMICS OF THE REDUCED DENSITY MA TRIX We set up the Born-Markov master equa- tion for a CMO linearly coupled to a heat-bath via position coordinates and in the presence of a field-bath interaction to study the dissipative and decohering dynamics of the system. Using the Born-Markov approximation, the Liouville- von Neuman...

  6. [6]

    RESUL TS In this section we analyze the behaviour of various experimentally observable quantities like the time evolution of the position and velocity autocorrelation functions, the position-velocity correlation functions and the off-diagonal ele- ments of the reduced density matrix. FIG. 1: The position auto-correlation function versus time for different...

  7. [7]

    Hybrid ion–atom trapping techniques provide a suitable route for confining the CMO

    EXPERIMENT AL PROPOSAL An experimental platform can be engineered to test the predictions of our theoretical model. Hybrid ion–atom trapping techniques provide a suitable route for confining the CMO. In partic- ular, we consider a Penning trap, where stable confinement is achieved via the superposition of static quadrupolar electric fields (generated by r...

  8. [8]

    Our work follows on similar research works in the context of Brownian dy- namics [15, 16] where the authors confine to a classical situation

    DISCUSSION In this work, we have investigated the dissi- pative quantum dynamics of a charged magneto- oscillator interacting with a thermal reservoir in the presence of an additional coupling between the external confining field and the bath de- grees of freedom. Our work follows on similar research works in the context of Brownian dy- namics [15, 16] wh...

  9. [9]

    M. P. A. Fisher and W. Zwerger, Quantum brownian motion in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. B32, 6190 (1985)

    1985

  10. [10]

    Eisert and M

    J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio, Quantum and clas- sical correlations in quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 137902 (2002)

    2002

  11. [11]

    Blume-Kohout and W

    R. Blume-Kohout and W. H. Zurek, Quantum darwinism in quantum brownian motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 240405 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y. Zhang, Quantum brownian motion in a general environment. ii. nonlinear coupling and perturbative approach, Phys. Rev. D47, 1576 (1993)

    1993

  13. [13]

    Bauer, D

    M. Bauer, D. Bernard, and A. Tilloy, The open quantum brownian motions, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014, P09001 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Pucci, M

    L. Pucci, M. Esposito, and L. Peliti, Entropy production in quantum brownian motion, Jour- nal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Exper- iment2013, P04005 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Cobanera, P

    E. Cobanera, P. Kristel, and C. Morais Smith, Quantum brownian motion in a landau level, Phys. Rev. B93, 245422 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    Bhattacharjee, U

    S. Bhattacharjee, U. Satpathi, and S. Sinha, Quantum langevin dynamics of a charged par- ticle in a magnetic field: Response function, position–velocity and velocity autocorrelation functions, Pramana96, 53 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Bhattacharjee, K

    S. Bhattacharjee, K. Mandal, and S. Sinha, Decoherence and the ultraviolet cutoff: non- markovian dissipative dynamics of a charged particle in a magnetic field, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 245301 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Rajesh and M

    A. Rajesh and M. Bandyopadhyay, Quantum brownian magneto-oscillator: Role of environ- mental spectrum and external magnetic field in decoherence and decay processes, Phys. Rev. A 92, 012105 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    Bhattacharjee, U

    S. Bhattacharjee, U. Satpathi, and S. Sinha, Quantum brownian motion of a charged os- cillator in a magnetic field coupled to a heat bath through momentum variables, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications605, 128010 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Gupta and M

    S. Gupta and M. Bandyopadhyay, Quantum langevin equation of a charged oscillator in a magnetic field and coupled to a heat bath through momentum variables, Phys. Rev. E84, 041133 (2011)

    2011

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharjee, K

    S. Bhattacharjee, K. Mandal, and S. Sinha, Decoherence of a charged brownian particle in a magnetic field: an analysis of the roles of coupling via position and momentum variables, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theo- retical57, 375304 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Bhattacharjee, K

    S. Bhattacharjee, K. Mandal, and S. Sinha, Decoherence of a dissipative brownian charged magneto-anharmonic oscillator: an information theoretic approach, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical58, 505301 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    P. J. Colmenares, Generalized dynamics and fluctuation-dissipation theorem for a parabolic potential, Phys. Rev. E108, 014115 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    P. J. Colmenares, Behavior of the generalized brownian motion in a parabolic potential: Ef- fect of the field on the bath, Phys. Rev. E110, 064125 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    J. O. Daldrop, B. G. Kowalik, and R. R. Netz, External potential modifies friction of molecular solutes in water, Phys. Rev. X7, 041065 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Vroylandt and P

    H. Vroylandt and P. Monmarch´ e, Position- dependent memory kernel in generalized langevin equations: Theory and numerical estimation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 156, 10.1063/5.0094566 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0094566 2022

  27. [27]

    Fukui and T

    Y. Fukui and T. Morita, Derivation of the sta- tionary generalized langevin equation, Journal of Physics A: General Physics4, 477 (1971)

    1971

  28. [28]

    Grabert, Nonlinear transport and dynamics of fluctuations, Journal of Statistical Physics19, 479 (1978)

    H. Grabert, Nonlinear transport and dynamics of fluctuations, Journal of Statistical Physics19, 479 (1978)

    1978

  29. [29]

    Widder, J

    C. Widder, J. Zimmer, and T. Schilling, On the generalized langevin equation and the mori pro- jection operator technique, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical58, 405001 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    J. E. Straub, B. J. Berne, and B. Roux, Spatial dependence of time-dependent friction for pair diffusion in a simple fluid, The Journal of chem- ical physics93, 6804 (1990)

    1990

  31. [31]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, B

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Lalo¨ e, Quantum mechanics, volume 3: fermions, bosons, photons, correlations, and entanglement (John Wiley & Sons, 2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    X. L. Li, G. W. Ford, and R. F. O’Connell, Charged oscillator in a heat bath in the pres- ence of a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A42, 4519 (1990)

    1990

  33. [33]

    Bhattacharjee, U

    S. Bhattacharjee, U. Satpathi, and S. Sinha, Long-time tails in quantum brownian motion of 15 a charged particle in a magnetic field, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications608, 128266 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    R. Shankar,Principles of quantum mechanics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Huang,Statistical mechanics(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    K. Huang,Statistical mechanics(John Wiley & Sons, 2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    H¨ anggi and G.-L

    P. H¨ anggi and G.-L. Ingold, Fundamental as- pects of quantum brownian motion, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 15, 10.1063/1.1853631 (2005)

    doi:10.1063/1.1853631 2005

  37. [37]

    Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measure- ment problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev

    M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence, the measure- ment problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 1267 (2005)

    2005

  38. [38]

    Schlosshauer,The quantum-to-classical tran- sition(Springer, 2007)

    M. Schlosshauer,The quantum-to-classical tran- sition(Springer, 2007)

    2007

  39. [39]

    Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports831, 1 (2019), quantum decoherence

    M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports831, 1 (2019), quantum decoherence

    2019

  40. [40]

    De Vega and D

    I. De Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non- markovian open quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    S. Bhar, M. Swar, U. Satpathi, S. Sinha, R. Sorkin, S. Chaudhuri, and S. Roy, Measure- ments and analysis of response function of cold atoms in optical molasses, Optics Continuum1, 171 (2022)

    2022

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.5 on July 14, 2026.