Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 2 cited by

Tunable non-Hermitian skin effect and topological phases in ladders with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping reverses the non-Hermitian skin effect and places zero-energy edge modes on opposite ladder legs.

desk verdict Solid, reproducible ladder model that actually lets you reverse and energy-tune NHSE and put zero modes on opposite legs; incremental but cleanly done and worth a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11454 v1 pith:KBHT2QYX submitted 2026-07-13 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Pu-Xuan Li , Qi-Bo Zeng This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords non-HermitianskineffecttopologicalphasesladdermodelsSSHchainnonreciprocalhoppingspectralwindingnumberreal-spaceedgemodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a ladder made of an SSH chain glued to an ordinary tight-binding chain by staggered, nonreciprocal vertical hoppings. It shows that the same staggered nonreciprocity that produces the non-Hermitian skin effect also lets experimenters reverse the direction of skin accumulation or even make that direction energy-dependent simply by changing hoppings or the nonreciprocity strength. The same coupling dramatically enlarges the region of parameter space that supports topological zero-energy edge modes relative to an isolated SSH chain. Those zero modes sit entirely on one leg or the other according to the sign of a real-space winding number, and sufficiently strong nonreciprocity eventually destroys the topological phase altogether. The result supplies a concrete, tunable mechanism for controlling both localization and topology in quasi-one-dimensional open systems.

What carries the argument

Staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping (amplitudes J e^{±γ} that reverse direction on odd versus even sites) together with the spectral winding number of the periodic-boundary spectrum and the real-space winding number constructed from the open-boundary Q-matrix.

What would settle it

Compute or measure the open-boundary spectrum and real-space winding number for larger system sizes across the claimed W=+1/W=−1 boundary; if the zero modes lose their leg selectivity or the winding number ceases to be quantized while bulk gaps remain open, the topological characterization fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping in an SSH–normal-chain ladder induces a non-Hermitian skin effect whose direction under open boundaries can be reversed or made energy-dependent by tuning the intracell hopping or the nonreciprocity parameter; the same coupling enlarges the topologically nontrivial regime, places the protected zero-energy edge modes on opposite legs according to real-space winding numbers W=±1, and drives the system trivial once nonreciprocity exceeds a critical value.

Load-bearing premise

The real-space winding number remains a trustworthy topological invariant for the zero modes even when the bulk bands are not cleanly separated near the phase boundary, and that finite lattices of a few hundred sites already capture the thermodynamic localization and phase structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Direction of skin accumulation under open boundaries can be flipped or made energy-dependent by a single hopping or nonreciprocity parameter.
  • Topologically nontrivial parameter window for zero-energy edge modes is substantially larger than that of an isolated SSH chain.
  • Zero-energy edge modes can be forced to reside exclusively on the upper or lower leg according to the sign of the real-space winding number.
  • Strong enough staggered nonreciprocity extinguishes the topological phase, offering an on/off switch for protected edge modes.
  • Spectral winding numbers of the periodic-boundary loops directly predict the observed open-boundary localization directions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The energy-dependent skin effect and leg-selective edge modes could be used as a spectroscopic filter that routes different energy windows to opposite physical ends of a photonic or cold-atom ladder.
  • The same staggered nonreciprocity recipe should apply to other ladder building blocks (Kitaev, Creutz, etc.), potentially generating non-Abelian or higher-order skin phenomena.
  • Because the topological phase is destroyed by large γ, moderate nonreciprocity may be experimentally preferable, suggesting a practical design window for devices that need both skin localization and protected edge modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a non-Hermitian ladder consisting of an SSH upper leg and a uniform tight-binding lower leg, coupled by staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping (Eqs. 1–2). Using OBC diagonalization with a directional IPR (Eqs. 3–4), a four-band Bloch Hamiltonian (Eq. 5), spectral winding numbers under PBC (Eq. 9), and real-space winding numbers from the open-boundary Q-matrix (Eqs. 15–16), the authors show that the NHSE direction can be reversed or made energy-dependent by tuning v or γ, that the inter-leg coupling enlarges the topologically nontrivial regime relative to an isolated SSH chain, that zero-energy edge modes localize on opposite legs according to W=±1, and that large nonreciprocity drives the system into a trivial phase. Critical points v=±1 where the NHSE vanishes are derived analytically (Eqs. 11–12) and match the numerics.

Significance. The work cleanly demonstrates that staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping is a practical control knob for both NHSE directionality (including energy-dependent skin localization) and topological phase structure in quasi-1D ladders. Strengths include an explicit Bloch Hamiltonian, closed-form critical spectra that correctly predict the absence of point gaps, standard and well-documented diagnostics (dIPR, spectral winding, real-space winding), and a phase diagram that makes the enlarged nontrivial regimes and leg-selective edge modes transparent. These results are of clear interest for non-Hermitian topological band theory and for experimental platforms (photonic, topolectrical, cold-atom) that can realize nonreciprocal ladders.

minor comments (4)
  1. Near the W=+1/W=−1 boundary the authors already note that bulk bands are not cleanly separated and that isolated points in Fig. 7 arise from finite-precision issues (Sec. IV). A short additional remark or a supplementary finite-size scan of the real-space winding would further reassure readers that the two enlarged nontrivial regimes remain robust in the thermodynamic limit.
  2. The finite-energy in-gap modes are correctly identified as non-topological and attributed to inter-leg coupling (with a pointer to arXiv:2606.28816). A one-sentence sketch of the perturbative argument, or an explicit citation to the relevant equation in that work, would make the claim self-contained.
  3. Fig. 3 and Fig. 6 use site indices 1–100 (upper) and 101–200 (lower). Adding a brief reminder of this labeling convention in the figure captions would improve readability.
  4. Typographical consistency: “HAMIL TONIAN” in the Sec. II heading should be “HAMILTONIAN”; a few instances of spacing around ± and e^{±γ} could be tightened.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: results follow from an explicitly defined Hamiltonian, standard NHSE/topology diagnostics, and analytic critical-point checks.

full rationale

The paper defines a concrete four-site ladder Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–2) with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg terms, obtains the Bloch form (Eq. 5) and closed-form critical spectra at v=±1 (Eqs. 11–12) that correctly predict the absence of point gaps, and diagnoses NHSE direction via dIPR under OBC together with the ordinary spectral winding number W_k of the PBC spectrum (Eq. 9). Topological phases are characterized by the standard real-space winding number constructed from the open-boundary Q-matrix under chiral symmetry (Eqs. 13–16). All central claims—tunable/energy-dependent NHSE, enlarged nontrivial regimes, and leg-selective zero modes with W=±1—are obtained by direct diagonalization and these invariants applied to the newly introduced model; none reduce by construction to a fitted constant or to a prior equation of the same authors. The sole self-citation ([62], arXiv:2606.28816) is invoked only for a non-load-bearing side remark that finite-energy in-gap states are non-topological and can be understood perturbatively; it is not used to justify the NHSE or the W=±1 zero-mode claims. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Pure theoretical tight-binding study. No data fitting. Load-bearing ingredients are the postulated staggered nonreciprocal ladder Hamiltonian, standard non-Hermitian spectral and real-space winding definitions, and the maintained chiral symmetry that allows the real-space winding number. No new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Non-Hermitian skin effect under OBC is diagnosed by point-gap topology (spectral winding) of the PBC spectrum.
    Invoked throughout Sec. III and used to interpret Figs. 2–4; standard in the field (Refs. 33–34) but not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The open-boundary real-space winding number W = (1/(2L')) Tr'(S Q [Q, X]) correctly classifies topological phases of chiral-symmetric non-Hermitian systems.
    Eqs. 13–16 and Sec. IV; taken from prior literature (Ref. 18) and applied without additional proof of validity for this ladder.
  • ad hoc to paper The model Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–2) with real parameters v, w, t, J, γ and staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg terms is a faithful description of the intended physical ladder.
    Postulated in Sec. II; the staggering pattern is the paper's central modeling choice.
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry S = I ⊗ σ_z is preserved and protects the zero-energy modes.
    Stated in Sec. IV (Eq. 13); required for the real-space winding construction.
invented entities (1)
  • Ladder with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping (SSH upper leg + uniform lower leg)
    purpose: Provides the concrete platform in which NHSE direction reversal, energy-dependent NHSE, and leg-selective W = ±1 topology are demonstrated.
    The specific staggering (odd sites Je^γ / Je^{-γ}, even sites reversed) is introduced by the authors; independent experimental realization is not yet reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tunable non-Hermitian skin effect and topological phases in ladders with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBHT2QYX

@misc{pith2026260711454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tunable non-Hermitian skin effect and topological phases in ladders with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBHT2QYX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11454}
}
abstract

We investigate the non-Hermitian skin effect (NHSE) and topological phases in a ladder model with staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping, consisting of an Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain coupled to a normal tight-binding chain. By tuning the system parameters, we show that the direction of the NHSE under open boundary conditions can be reversed and can even become energy dependent. The NHSE is further characterized by the spectral winding number under periodic boundary conditions. We further demonstrate that the inter-leg coupling significantly enlarges the topologically nontrivial parameter regime. Remarkably, the zero-energy topological edge modes reside on different legs of the ladder and are characterized by real-space winding numbers $W=\pm1$. Furthermore, increasing the nonreciprocity of the inter-leg hopping modifies the topological phase boundaries and eventually drives the system into a topologically trivial phase. Our results establish staggered nonreciprocal inter-leg hopping as an effective mechanism for engineering both the non-Hermitian skin effect and topological phases in ladder systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11454 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic illustration of the ladder [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Energy spectra of the ladder model un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Spatial distributions of the eigenstates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) (a) Absolute values of the eigenenergies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) Topological phase diagram of the lad [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Point-gap topology in amorphous non-Hermitian quantum systems

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a 1D amorphous non-Hermitian chain, a singular-value-based real-space winding number stays quantized and predicts protected edge states even when the eigenvalue spectrum is unstable.

  2. Spectral Mixing, Skin Localization, and Linear Optical Response in Dissipative Photonic Lattices

    physics.optics 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A biorthogonal response participation number separates coherent interference from spectral mixing in a dissipative Hatano-Nelson photonic chain and reveals a finite-size disorder crossover before the skin center shifts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Cao and J

    H. Cao and J. Wiersig, Dielectric microcavities: Model systems for wave chaos and non-Hermitian physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.87,61 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    V. V. Konotop, J. Yang, and D. A. Zezyulin, Nonlinear waves in PT-symmetric systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035002 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69,249 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93,015005 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80,5243 (1998)

    1998

  6. [6]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamilto- nians, Rep. Prog. Phys.70,947 (2007)

    2007

  7. [7]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45,444016 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Hu and E

    H. Hu and E. Zhao, Knots and non-Hermitian Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.126,010401 (2021)

    2021

Show all 90 references
  1. [9]

    K. Wang, A. Dutt, C. C. Wojcik, and S. Fan, Topological complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands, Nature (London)598,59 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121,136802 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-Hermitian Bulk-Boundary Correspondence and Auxiliary General- ized Brillouin Zone Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.125,226402 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Non-Hermitian robust edge states in one dimension: Anomalous localization and eigenspace condensation at exceptional points, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401(R) (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, M. Berdakin, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Topological states of non-Hermitian systems, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.227, 1295 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103(R) (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Zhou and J

    H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Periodic table for topological bands with non-Hermitian symmetries, Phys. Rev. B99, 235112 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X9,041015 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Skin Effect and Chiral Damping in Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123,170401 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Okuma and Masatoshi Sato, Hermitian zero modes protected by nonnormality: Application of pseudospec- tra, Phys

    N. Okuma and Masatoshi Sato, Hermitian zero modes protected by nonnormality: Application of pseudospec- tra, Phys. Rev. B102,014203 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-Hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nat. Phys.16,761 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Yoshida, T

    T. Yoshida, T. Mizoguchi, and Y. Hatsugai, Mirror skin effect and its electric circuit simulation, Phys. Rev. Re- search2,022062(R) (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Longhi, Probing non-Hermitian skin effect and non- Bloch phase transitions, Phys

    S. Longhi, Probing non-Hermitian skin effect and non- Bloch phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Research1,023013 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Yi and Z

    Y. Yi and Z. Yang, Non-Hermitian Skin Modes Induced by On-Site Dissipations and Chiral Tunneling Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.125,186802 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Claes and T

    J. Claes and T. L. Hughes, Skin effect and winding num- ber in disordered non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 103,L140201 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Liouvillian skin effect: slowing down of relaxation pro- cesses without gap closing, Phys. Rev. Lett.127,070402 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Zeng and R

    Q.-B. Zeng and R. L¨ u, Real spectra and phase transition of skin effect in nonreciprocal systems, Phys. Rev. B105, 245407 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Zeng, Non-Hermitian skin effect edge, Phys

    Q.-B. Zeng, Non-Hermitian skin effect edge, Phys. Rev. B106,235411 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Zeng and R

    Q.-B. Zeng and R. L¨ u, Gaussian eigenstate pinning in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A107, 062221 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Xiao and Q.-B

    H. Xiao and Q.-B. Zeng, Coexistence of non-Hermitian skin effect and extended states in one-dimensional non- reciprocal lattices, Phys. Rev. B110,024205 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Xiong, Why does bulk boundary correspondence fail in some non-hermitian topological models, J

    Y. Xiong, Why does bulk boundary correspondence fail in some non-hermitian topological models, J. Phys. Com- mun.2,035043 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    J. C. Budich and E. J. Bergholtz, Non-Hermitian topo- logical sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett.125,180403 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Koch and J

    F. Koch and J. C. Budich, Quantum non-Hermitian topo- logical sensors, Phys. Rev. Research4,013113 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological origin of non-Hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.124,086801 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian 8 systems Phys. Rev. Lett.125,126402 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Liu, Z.-B

    Z.-X. Liu, Z.-B. Yang, Y.-J. Han, W. Yi, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry-protected topological phases in spin ladders with two-body interactions, Phys. Rev. B86,195122 (2012)

    2012

  28. [36]

    X. Li, E. Zhao, and W. Vincent Liu, Topological states in a ladder-like optical lattice containing ultracold atoms in higher orbital bands, Nat. Commun.4,1523 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Sun, Topological phases of fermionic ladders with pe- riodic magnetic fields, Phys

    G. Sun, Topological phases of fermionic ladders with pe- riodic magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A93,023608 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Ogino, S

    T. Ogino, S. Furukawa, R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and N. Kawashima, Symmetry protected topological phases and competing orders in a spin-1/2 XXZ ladder with a four- spin interaction, Phys. Rev. B104,075135 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Ogino, R

    T. Ogino, R. Kaneko, S. Morita, and S. Furukawa, Ground-state phase diagram of a spin-1/2 frustrated XXZ ladder, Phys. Rev. B106,155106 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Mondal, A

    S. Mondal, A. Agarwala, T. Mishra, and A. Prakash, Symmetry-enriched criticality in a coupled spin ladder, Phys. Rev. B108,245135 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Parida, A

    R. Parida, A. Padhan, and T. Mishra, Interaction driven topological phase transitions of hardcore bosons on a two- leg ladder, Phys. Rev. B110,165110 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    C A Downing, L Mart´ ın-Moreno and O I R Fox, Uncon- ventional edge states in a two-leg ladder, New J. Phys. 26,073014 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Sara Aghtouman and Mir Vahid Hosseini, Dimerized hof- stadter model in two-leg ladder quasi-crystals, Scientific Reports 14, 8782 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Jo˜ ao Pedro Gama D’Elia and Thereza Paiva, Topological phase transition in the two-leg Hubbard model: emer- gence of the Haldane phase via diagonal hopping and strong interactions, Phys. Rev. B112,035169 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Lu and S

    J. Lu and S. Wang, Tight-binding investigation of the metallic proximity effect of semiconductor metal double- wall carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B76,233103 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    Shoman, A

    T. Shoman, A. Takayama, T. Sato, S. Souma, T. Taka- hashi, T. Oguchi, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Topological proximity effect in a topological insulator hybrid, Nat. Commun.6,6547 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    T. H. Hsieh, H. Ishizuka, L. Balents, and T. L. Hughes, Bulk topological proximity effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 086802 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Cheng, P

    P. Cheng, P. W. Klein, K. Plekhanov, K. Sengstock, M. Aidelsburger, C. Weitenberg, and K. Le Hur, Topological proximity effects in a Haldane graphene bilayer system, Phys. Rev. B100,081107(R) (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Jun-Hui Zheng and Walter Hofstetter, Topological invari- ant for two-dimensional open systems, Phys. Rev. B97, 195434 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Sun and L.-K

    N. Sun and L.-K. Lim, Quantum charge pumps with topological phases in a Creutz ladder, Phys. Rev. B96, 035139 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Y. Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Flat-band many-body localization and ergodicity breaking in the Creutz ladder, New J. Phys.22,013032 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Orito, Y

    T. Orito, Y. Kuno, and I. Ichinose, Interplay and com- petition between disorder and flat band in an interacting Creutz ladder, Phys. Rev. B104,094202 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Mukherjee, A

    A. Mukherjee, A. Nandy, S. Sil, and A. Chakrabarti, Tai- loring flat bands and topological phases in a multistrand Creutz network, Phys. Rev. B105,035428 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Pelegr´ ı, S

    G. Pelegr´ ı, S. Flannigan, and A. J. Daley, Few-body bound topological and flat-band states in a Creutz lad- der, Phys. Rev. B109,235412 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Zhang and Q

    S.-L. Zhang and Q. Zhou, Two-leg Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain with glide reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. A95, 061601 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    C. Li, S. Lin, G. Zhang, and Z. Song, Topological nodal points in two coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chains, Phys. Rev. B96,125418 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    Padavi´ c, S

    K. Padavi´ c, S. S. Hegde, W. DeGottardi, and S. Vishveshwara, Topological phases, edge modes, and the Hofstadter butterfly in coupled Su-Schrieffer-Heeger sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B98,024205 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    A. A. Nersesyan, Phase diagram of an interacting stag- gered Su-Schrieffer-Heeger two-chain ladder close to a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B102,045108 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Jangjan and M

    M. Jangjan and M. V. Hosseini, Floquet engineering of topological metal states and hybridization of edge states with bulk states in dimerized two-leg ladders, Scientific Reports10,14256 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Jangjan and M

    M. Jangjan and M. V. Hosseini, Topological proper- ties of subsystem-symmetry-protected edge states in an extended quasi-one-dimensional dimerized lattice, Phys. Rev. B106,205111 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    Padhan, S

    A. Padhan, S. Mondal, S. Vishveshwara, and T. Mishra, Interacting bosons on a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger ladder: Topological phases and thouless pumping, Phys. Rev. B 109,085120 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Zeng, Topological phase and its effective tuning in a ladder lattice, arXiv: 2606.28816

    Q.-B. Zeng, Topological phase and its effective tuning in a ladder lattice, arXiv: 2606.28816

    arXiv

  55. [63]

    DeGottardi, D

    W. DeGottardi, D. Sen and S. Vishveshwara, Topological phases, Majorana modes and quench dynamics in a spin ladder system, New J. Phys.13,065028 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Wu, Topological phases of the two-leg Kitaev ladder, Phys

    N. Wu, Topological phases of the two-leg Kitaev ladder, Phys. Lett. A376,3530 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    Wakatsuki, M

    R. Wakatsuki, M. Ezawa, and N. Nagaosa, Majorana fermions and multiple topological phase transition in Ki- taev ladder topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 89,174514 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Maiellaro, F

    A. Maiellaro, F. Romeo, and R. Citro, Topological phase diagram of a Kitaev ladder, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.227, 1397 (2018)

    2018

  59. [67]

    Shibata and H

    N. Shibata and H. Katsura, Dissipative spin chain as a non-Hermitian Kitaev ladder, Phys. Rev. B99,174303 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Nehra, D

    R. Nehra, D. S. Bhakuni, A. Ramachandran, and A. Sharma, Flat bands and entanglement in the Kitaev lad- der, Phys. Rev. Res.2,013175 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Xu and H.-Y

    H. Xu and H.-Y. Kee, Reviving Majorana zero modes in the spin-1/2 Kitaev ladder model, Phys. Rev. B110, 195133 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    X. M. Yang, X. Z. Zhang, C. Li, and Z. Song, Dynamical signature of the moir¨ e pattern in a non-Hermitian ladder, Phys. Rev. B98,085306 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    J. S. Liu, Y. Z. Han, and C. S. Liu, Topological phases of a non-Hermitian coupled SSH ladder, Chin. Phys. B 28,100304 (2019)

    2019

  64. [72]

    S. M. Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z. B. Siu, H. Sahin, C. H. Lee, and M. B. A. Jalil, Critical hybridization of skin modes in coupled non-Hermitian chains, Phys. Rev. Res.4,013243 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    C. Wu, Z. Yang, J. Tang, N. Liu, and G. Chen, Flux- controlled skin effect and topological transition in a dis- sipative two-leg ladder model, Phys. Rev. A106,062206 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    S. Mu, L. Zhou, L. Li, and J. Gong, Non-Hermitian 9 pseudo mobility edge in a coupled chain system, Phys. Rev. B105,205402 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    Li, Topological properties of non- Hermitian Creutz ladders, Chin

    H.-Q Liang and L. Li, Topological properties of non- Hermitian Creutz ladders, Chin. Phys. B31,010310 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Qi, A.-L

    L. Qi, A.-L. He, H.-F. Wang, and Y. Liu, Topologi- cal semimetal phase and dynamical characterization in a non-Hermitian two-leg ladder model, Phys. Rev. B107, 115107 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    X. Wang, L. Xiao, Q. Lin, K. Wang, H. Lin, and P. Xue, Demonstration of reversed non-Hermitian skin effect via quantum walks on a ladder, New J. Phys.25,113039 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    Chen, Antichiral and trap-skin dynamics in a non- reciprocal bosonic two-leg ladder with artificial magnetic flux, Phys

    R.-J. Chen, Antichiral and trap-skin dynamics in a non- reciprocal bosonic two-leg ladder with artificial magnetic flux, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043311 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Jiang, H

    W.-C. Jiang, H. Wu, Q.-X. Li, J. Li, and J.-J. Zhu, Tun- able non-Hermitian skin effect via gain and loss, Phys. Rev. B110,155144 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    H. Tang, Z. Wang, L. Tang, D. Song, Z. Chen, and H. Buljan, Control of non-Hermitian skin effect by staggered synthetic gauge fields, APL Photonics9,056102 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Y. Tang, J. Wu, P. Lai, Y. Hu, H. Liu, W. Deng, H. Cheng, Z. Liu, and S. Chen, Loss induced delocalization of topological boundary modes, Nat Commun16,10420 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. Wu, M. Yan, and G. Chen, Observation of non-Hermitian pseudo-mobility-edge in a coupled electric circuit ladder, Phys. Rev. B111,014304 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    K. Roy, K. Gogoi, and S. Basu, Topological characteri- zation of a non-Hermitian ladder via Floquet non-Bloch theory, Phys. Rev. B111,115424 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    Zhou, Z.-C

    Z. Zhou, Z.-C. Xu, and L.-J. Lang, Non-Abelian ge- ometry, topology, and dynamics of a nonreciprocal Su- Schrieffer-Heeger ladder, Phys. Rev. B112,094305 (2025)

    2025

  77. [85]

    Wang and J.-H

    L.-W. Wang and J.-H. Jiang, Non-Hermitian glide-time symmetry: Topology and dynamics, Phys. Rev. B112, 035114 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    E. S. Ma, K. L. Zhang, and Z. Song, Dynamically sta- ble topological edge states in an extended Su-Schrieffer- Heeger ladder with balanced perturbation, Phys. Rev. B 112,195134 (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    Roy, Floquet non-Bloch formalism for a non- Hermitian ladder: From theoretical framework to topolectrical circuits, Phys

    K. Roy, Floquet non-Bloch formalism for a non- Hermitian ladder: From theoretical framework to topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. Res.7,043331 (2025)

    2025

  80. [88]

    Sarkar, S

    S. Sarkar, S. Satpathi, and S. K. Pati, Localization transi- tions in an open quasiperiodic ladder, arXiv: 2511.08053

  81. [89]

    W. Lin, C. Liu, B. Ruan, Y. Zou, X. Dai, and Y. Xiang, Manipulating the non-Hermitian skin effect through non- reciprocal flux in topolectrical circuits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 127,133306 (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    Z. Li, R. Cai, X. Wang, K. Shimomura, C. Lu, Z. Yang, M. Sato, and G. Ma, Exceptional deficiency of non- Hermitian systems, Nat. Phys.22,962 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.