Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 30 references

This paper claims that the complete strong-coupling expansion of the O(6) mass gap is governed by the same universal trans-series structure as Fredholm determinants with a matrix Bessel kernel, and that the squared mass gap equals, to all o

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 06:04 UTC pith:W4EFGOJV

load-bearing objection Solid, honest paper that introduces a genuinely new tilted mass gap and a powerful generating framework, but the 'exact' all-orders relation is a conditional theorem resting on two stated conjectures, not a proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.13140 v1 pith:W4EFGOJV submitted 2026-07-14 hep-th

From Fredholm Determinants to AdS/CFT Observables: A Universal Strong-Coupling Framework

Bercel Boldis , Dennis le Plat This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq
keywords resurgencetrans-seriescusp anomalous dimensionO(6) mass gapFredholm determinantsAlien calculusAdS/CFTstrong coupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that the strong-coupling expansion of the O(6) mass gap — the dynamically generated mass of the worldsheet sigma model in the Alday–Maldacena limit of N=4 super Yang–Mills theory — is not an independent asymptotic series but is governed by the same universal trans-series structure as Fredholm determinants with a matrix Bessel kernel. To expose this structure, the authors introduce a one-parameter 'tilted' version of both the cusp anomalous dimension and the mass gap; away from the physical value the two non-perturbative scales separate, making the resurgence relations visible. They then construct an Alien calculus whose derivatives act on non-perturbative sectors and show that all sectors of the tilted cusp and tilted mass gap can be generated from perturbative data. The central result is an exact, all-orders relation m^2_O(6) = 4 i e^{-2πg} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp connecting the squared mass gap to an Alien derivative of the cusp anomalous dimension. If true, this gives a complete algorithmic description of the O(6) mass gap and deepens the AdS/CFT link between the cusp anomalous dimension and the worldsheet mass gap.

Core claim

The paper claims that the complete strong-coupling trans-series of the O(6) mass gap — including all exponentially suppressed sectors and their 1/g corrections — can be obtained from the perturbative strong-coupling expansion of Fredholm determinants, using the same 'Alien calculus' previously developed for the tilted cusp. Its central formula is the exact relation m^2(α) = 4 i x^+_0 sin^3α cosα e^{−8πx^+_0 g} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp(α), which at α=π/4 becomes m^2_O(6) = 4 i e^{−2πg} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp. The authors prove, conditional on the conjectured Alien algebra, that ratios of successive non-perturbative sectors obey simple universal rules — m^{(n+1,0)}/m^{(n,0)} = m^{(1,0)}/m^{(0,0)} and the analogous

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 'tilted mass gap' m(α), a one-parameter deformation of the O(6) mass gap that reduces to it at α=π/4 and is expressed through the same Fredholm-determinant building blocks as the tilted cusp. The carrying mechanism is the Alien calculus: operators Δ^±_j acting on the non-perturbative sectors of the determinant, cusp, and mass gap with the algebra (5.13)/(5.19)/(5.30), together with shift relations that express each sector's 1/g-series as the perturbative series evaluated at shifted values of the tilt parameter a and the moments I_n. These rules generate every non-perturbative sector from the perturbative one and lead to the exact relation connecting the mass ga

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central formulas rely on the conjectured Alien algebra for the tilted cusp and tilted mass gap (Eqs. 5.19 and 5.30) together with the assumption that Alien derivatives obey the Leibniz and chain rules when acting on products and ratios of non-perturbative sectors (Appendix C); these are stated as conjectures rather than proven from first principles.

What would settle it

Compute the non-perturbative correction m^{(2,0)} or the Λ^8 sector of m_O(6) directly from the BES/integro-differential equations without using the Alien algebra, for example by solving the quantization condition to sufficiently high order in 1/g, and compare with the prediction of (5.31)/(4.12); any mismatch at a given order would falsify the conjectured algebra. A simpler check: verify numerically at a value of a where Λ_+ and Λ_- do not mix (for example a = 1/(2√2)) that the ratio m^{(n+1,0)}/m^{(n,0)} equals −Z_0^{({0},{})}/Z_0^{({},{})} for n≥0 to 50-digit precision.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every non-perturbative sector of the O(6) mass gap at strong coupling is determined by the perturbative sector: no new input is needed beyond the Fredholm determinant data.
  • The exact relation m^2_O(6) = 4 i e^{-2πg} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp ties two distinct AdS/CFT observables to all orders in 1/g, generalizing the leading-order relation known previously.
  • The ratio rules (5.25)/(5.31) hold for arbitrary tilt a, so the previously observed breakdown at Λ^6 for a=1/4 is understood as scale mixing, not a failure of the underlying recurrence.
  • The same Alien calculus applies to any observable expressible as a ratio of Fredholm determinants with the matrix Bessel kernel, making the framework universal for this class of quantities.
  • The tilted deformation separates the two exponential scales that merge at the physical value, revealing resurgence structures hidden in the a=1/4 limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjectured Alien algebra is upgraded to a theorem, the exact relation (5.35) becomes a non-perturbative identity that could serve as a definition of the mass gap from the cusp, extending the known weak-coupling checks.
  • The tilt works as a scale-separating regulator; the same trick could be applied to other observables whose trans-series parameters mix at special values, such as energy densities in O(N) sigma models.
  • The framework implies a testable prediction: the Stokes constants for m_O(6) beyond order Λ^8 should follow the same recurrence relations; a high-precision numerical Borel analysis of the Fredholm determinant at a=1/4 could verify or falsify this.
  • The commutativity and nilpotency of the determinant Alien algebra may reflect an underlying integrable structure; if so, the exact relation (5.35) is one of a family of relations among AdS/CFT observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the strong-coupling trans-series of the tilted cusp anomalous dimension in planar N=4 SYM and introduces a one-parameter 'tilted mass gap' that reduces to the O(6) mass gap at a=1/4. Using the Fredholm determinant representation and the differential-equation method, the authors compute the tilted mass gap to high non-perturbative order, find ratio relations between successive sectors, and propose Alien algebras for the tilted cusp (5.19) and tilted mass gap (5.30). From these they derive an exact all-orders relation m^2(α) = 4 i x^+_0 sin^3(α) cos(α) e^{-8πx^+_0 g} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp(α), which at a=1/4 reads m^2_O(6) = 4i e^{-2πg} Δ^+_0 Γ_cusp (Eqs. (5.35) and (5.49)).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides an algorithmic generation of all non-perturbative sectors of two AdS/CFT observables from the perturbative data of Fredholm determinants, and a strikingly compact all-orders relation between the O(6) mass gap and the cusp anomalous dimension. The paper contains substantial concrete checks: analytic results through O(g^{-2}) and numerical results up to O(g^{-20}) and Λ^{16}_- Λ^{16}_+ with high precision, agreement with the known O(6) mass-gap expansion (4.11)–(4.12), and an explanation of the breakdown of earlier conjectures in [11] via scale mixing. These strengths are real and should be credited. However, the 'exact' and 'complete' claims are conditional on two conjectures: the Alien algebras (5.19)/(5.30) and the Leibniz/quotient-rule assumption in Appendix C. The paper is transparent about these assumptions, but the advertised results outpace what has actually been proved.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2–5.3, Eqs. (5.19), (5.30), (5.35), (5.49)] The central all-orders relation (5.35)/(5.49) and the claim of a 'complete' trans-series are conditional on the conjectured Alien algebras (5.19) and (5.30). In particular, the factors (N_j^±+1) are introduced by hand and are not derived from the determinant algebra (5.13)–(5.15). The derivation of (5.35) via (5.33)–(5.34) uses precisely these algebras. The numerical/analytic checks are extensive but finite: they test many sectors, but not all orders. If the conjectured algebra fails in a mixed sector, the factor (N_0^++1) would change and the exact relation would not hold as stated. The authors are transparent, but the abstract and Section 6 present the result as exact; the manuscript should either prove (5.19)/(5.30) from the underlying determinant structure or explicitly state the main theorem as conditional on Conjectures 1 and 2, with the 'exact' wording qualified accordingly.
  2. [Appendix C, assumptions 2–3; Eqs. (5.25), (5.31), (5.33)] The proof of the ratio relations and the derivation of (5.33)/(5.35) assume that Alien derivatives act as ordinary derivations, satisfying the Leibniz and quotient rules on products and ratios of determinant trans-series. This is not automatic in resurgence theory: Alien derivatives are derivations with respect to the convolution product, and the Leibniz rule for pointwise products requires additional structure. The induction in (C.2)–(C.7) uses the power and quotient rules as inputs, not as consequences of the determinant data. This is a load-bearing gap for the exact-relation claim. Please either prove the Leibniz/quotient rule for the specific products in (5.18)/(5.29), or state it as a separate conjecture and verify it in mixed sectors such as ({0},{1}) and ({1},{0}) to all accessible orders.
  3. [Abstract and §4 (trans-series ansatz (4.4))] The word 'complete' in 'complete strong-coupling trans-series' is stronger than what is demonstrated. The trans-series (4.4) is generated from the conjectured algebra (5.30), and the computation up to Λ^{16}_-Λ^{16}_+ and O(g^{-20}) does not prove that no other exponential weights or sectors contribute at higher orders. The completeness claim should be qualified, or a proof of completeness of the sector basis should be supplied.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, first paragraph] Typo: 'titled mass gap' should be 'tilted mass gap'; the same typo appears in the opening of Section 6 ('referred to as the titled mass gap').
  2. [Eq. (3.19) and §3.2] The sign ambiguity in the perturbative coefficient c_+^{(0,0)} is fixed by requiring agreement with the physical mass gap, not by an intrinsic consistency condition. This is reasonable, but it should be stated more prominently as a non-derived input, since it fixes the overall normalization of the mass-gap trans-series.
  3. [Eqs. (5.3), (5.23), and surrounding text] The multiset notation {0^{(m)}} and the mapping between (n,m) and (δ_+,δ_-) notation are introduced somewhat informally. Adding a short table or explicit definition of {i^{(m)}} near (5.3) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The exact all-orders relation (5.35)/(5.49) and the 'proofs' of the ratio relations (5.25)/(5.31) are conditional on the conjectured Alien algebras (5.19)/(5.30) and the Leibniz/chain-rule assumption; the ratio 'proof' is self-definitional because the (N+1)-factor algebra encodes exactly those ratios.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Appendix C, proof of Eqs. (5.25) and (5.31); assumptions 2–3; Eqs. (5.19) and (5.30)]
    "In this appendix, we prove the relations (5.25) and (5.31). In order to do so, we will use the following three assumptions: 1. The perturbative part of the cusp anomalous dimension and the mass gap is given by (5.18) and (5.29) in terms of the Fredholm determinants. 2. The Alien derivatives act as derivatives on simple functions and obey the Leibniz rule and the chain rule. 3. The Alien algebra in (5.19) and (5.30) holds."

    The ratio relations (5.24)/(5.25)/(5.31) are presented as proven consequences, but the proof inputs the Alien algebra (5.19)/(5.30), whose (N_j^±+1) factors are precisely what forces the successive ratios. In Sections 5.2–5.3 that algebra is conjectured after observing those very ratios and after checking finite-order data, so the Appendix C 'proof' unpacks the conjecture rather than deriving the ratios from an independent first-principles structure. Consequently the advertised 'proving conjectured relations' and the exact all-orders relation (5.35)/(5.49) inherit this self-definitional conditionality.

full rationale

The paper is not globally circular: the trans-series coefficients of the tilted mass gap are computed from the integro-differential equations for a± and c±, and the physical a=1/4 results match the external benchmarks [10,11] to high orders. The Fredholm-determinant input (5.13) is imported from prior work by the same authors, but it is used as a reviewed construction with concrete shift and recurrence rules, and the mass-gap sectors are independently checked. However, the central advertised achievements—the complete Alien calculus and the exact all-orders relation m^2(α)=4 i x0^+ sin^3(α) cos(α) e^{-8πx0^+ g} Δ0^+ Γcusp(α)—are conditional on conjectured ingredients: the algebras (5.19) and (5.30), and the assumption that Alien derivatives obey Leibniz/chain rules on products and ratios (Appendix C). The finite-order verifications, while substantial (up to O(g^{-20}) and Λ^{16}), do not remove the conditional status. The Appendix C proof of the ratio relations is the most circular element: it assumes the (N+1)-factor algebra whose entire content is those ratio relations. Overall the derivation chain is a transparent conditional framework rather than an unconditional first-principles proof, but because the explicit trans-series and benchmark checks carry independent content, the score is 5 rather than higher.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central results are built on prior determinant structure (shift relations, Stokes constants, alien derivatives) from refs. [13,14,16] by the same group, plus two explicit conjectures (the alien algebra for cusp and mass gap, and the Leibniz-rule behavior). The single free discrete parameter is the sign of c_+^{(0,0)}, fixed by matching the known mass gap. No new physical entities are introduced; the 'tilted mass gap' is a mathematical deformation.

free parameters (1)
  • sign of c_+^{(0,0)} = +
    The initial value of c_+(g) is fixed up to an overall sign by eq. (3.18). The upper sign is chosen because 'only the upper sign gives the correct, physical result for the mass gap' (§3.2, after eq. (3.19)). This is a discrete parameter fixed by matching the known physical observable rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Perturbative relation Γ^{(0,0)} ∝ [m^{(0,0)}]^2, eq. (5.28), generalized from [10,11].
    Used to express the perturbative mass gap through determinant data (5.29); the all-orders relation (5.35) is obtained by acting on this input with alien derivatives. The relation is taken from prior literature and not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper Alien derivatives act as ordinary derivatives (Leibniz and chain rule) on products and ratios of non-perturbative sectors.
    Assumption 2 in Appendix C; needed to prove the ratio relations (5.25)/(5.31) and to 'resum' (5.34) into the exact relation (5.35). It is stated as an assumption, not proven.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjectured Alien algebra for the tilted cusp (5.19) and tilted mass gap (5.30).
    Stated explicitly as conjectures in §5.2 and §5.3. The 'complete' trans-series and the exact all-orders relation depend directly on these conjectures.
  • domain assumption Universal determinant structure established in [13]: shift relations (5.6), Stokes recurrences (5.8)-(5.9), alien algebra (5.13).
    Carried over from prior work by overlapping authors; not re-derived in this paper, but supported by numerical and analytic checks in that work.
invented entities (1)
  • Tilted mass gap m(α) no independent evidence
    purpose: One-parameter deformation of the O(6) mass gap that separates the two exponential scales Λ_±, making the resurgence structure visible; reduces to m_O(6) at a=1/4.
    Definition (4.1) is chosen by hand to reduce to the physical mass gap at a=1/4. The generic-α object has no external falsifiable handle; its only anchors are the known physical limit and internal consistency with the determinant framework.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 32943 in / 15223 out tokens · 136737 ms · 2026-08-02T06:04:42.465851+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the trans-series structure of the cusp anomalous dimension of $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory and the dynamically generated mass gap of the $\mathrm{O}(6)$ sigma model at strong 't Hooft coupling. We consider the one-parameter deformation of the cusp anomalous dimension, known as the tilted cusp, and review its strong-coupling expansion obtained through its representation in terms of Fredholm determinants with a matrix Bessel kernel. The advantage of this deformation is that the non-perturbative scales separate naturally, revealing structures that remain hidden in the physical limit. Motivated by this observation, we introduce the tilted mass gap, which reduces to the physical $\mathrm{O}(6)$ mass gap at a special value of the deformation parameter and exhibits a deep connection with the tilted cusp. This formulation allows us to determine the complete strong-coupling trans-series and resurgence structure of the $\mathrm{O}(6)$ mass gap, while extending and proving conjectured relations between successive non-perturbative corrections. Building on the underlying Fredholm determinant representation, we construct an Alien calculus that generates all non-perturbative sectors of these AdS/CFT observables directly from their perturbative expansions. Finally, we derive an exact all-orders relation between the strong-coupling trans-series of the $\mathrm{O}(6)$ mass gap and the cusp anomalous dimension of planar $\mathcal{N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Hooft,A planar diagram theory for strong interactions,Nuclear Physics B72(1974) 461

    G. Hooft,A planar diagram theory for strong interactions,Nuclear Physics B72(1974) 461

    1974

  5. [5]

    Pestun and et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(2017) 440301

    V. Pestun and et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50(2017) 440301

    2017

  6. [6]

    Basso, L.J

    B. Basso, L.J. Dixon and G. Papathanasiou,Origin of the Six-Gluon Amplitude in Planar N= 4Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 161603 [2001.05460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Basso, L.J

    B. Basso, L.J. Dixon, Y.-T. Liu and G. Papathanasiou,All-Orders Quadratic-Logarithmic Behavior for Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111602 [2211.12555]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Basso and G.P

    B. Basso and G.P. Korchemsky,Embedding nonlinear O(6) sigma model into N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B807(2009) 397 [0805.4194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Beisert, B

    N. Beisert, B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Transcendentality and Crossing,J. Stat. Mech.0701 (2007) P01021 [hep-th/0610251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  10. [10]

    Basso and G.P

    B. Basso and G.P. Korchemsky,Nonperturbative scales in AdS/CFT,J. Phys. A42(2009) 254005 [0901.4945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Dorigoni and Y

    D. Dorigoni and Y. Hatsuda,Resurgence of the Cusp Anomalous Dimension,JHEP09(2015) 138 [1506.03763]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Alday and J.M

    L.F. Alday and J.M. Maldacena,Comments on operators with large spin,JHEP11(2007) 019 [0708.0672]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Boldis,Strong coupling structure ofN= 4SYM observables with matrix Bessel kernel, 2602.18557

    B. Boldis,Strong coupling structure ofN= 4SYM observables with matrix Bessel kernel, 2602.18557

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and D. le Plat,The full strong coupling expansion of the cusp anomalous dimension, 2603.17943

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and D. le Plat,Universality in the resurgence of generalized Tracy-Widom distributions,Phys. Lett. B874(2026) 140232 [2509.20302]

    arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and G.P. Korchemsky,Exploring superconformal Yang-Mills theories through matrix Bessel kernels,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 004 [2412.08732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Dunne,Resurgence of the tilted cusp anomalous dimension ∗,J

    G.V. Dunne,Resurgence of the tilted cusp anomalous dimension ∗,J. Phys. A58(2025) 205401 [2501.03105]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Eden and M

    B. Eden and M. Staudacher,Integrability and transcendentality,J. Stat. Mech.0611(2006) P11014 [hep-th/0603157]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  19. [19]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and G.P. Korchemsky,Tracy-Widom Distribution in Four-Dimensional Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 031601 [2403.13050]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Bajnok, B

    Z. Bajnok, B. Boldis and G.P. Korchemsky,Solving four-dimensional superconformal Yang-Mills theories with Tracy-Widom distribution,JHEP04(2025) 005 [2409.17227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Bajnok, J

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog, B. Basso, G.P. Korchemsky and L. Palla,Scaling function in AdS/CFT from the O(6) sigma model,Nucl. Phys. B811(2009) 438 [0809.4952]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Basso, G.P

    B. Basso, G.P. Korchemsky and J. Kotanski,Cusp anomalous dimension in maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 091601 [0708.3933]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Bajnok, J

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog and I. Vona,Wiener-Hopf solution of the free energy TBA problem and instanton sectors in the O(3) sigma model, 2404.07621

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Belitsky and G.P

    A.V. Belitsky and G.P. Korchemsky,Exact null octagon,JHEP05(2020) 070 [1907.13131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Belitsky and G.P

    A.V. Belitsky and G.P. Korchemsky,Octagon at finite coupling,JHEP07(2020) 219 [2003.01121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Belitsky and G.P

    A.V. Belitsky and G.P. Korchemsky,Crossing bridges with strong Szeg˝ o limit theorem,JHEP 04(2021) 257 [2006.01831]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,Fortsch

    M. Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,Fortsch. Phys.62(2014) 455 [1206.6272]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys

    D. Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys. 409(2019) 167914 [1411.3585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Aniceto, G

    I. Aniceto, G. Basar and R. Schiappa,A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,Phys. Rept.809(2019) 1 [1802.10441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Bajnok, J

    Z. Bajnok, J. Balog and I. Vona,The complete trans-series for conserved charges in integrable field theories,Annals Phys.481(2025) 170152 [2501.16435]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025