Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 45 references

SIDDHARTA-2 establishes the most precise measurement of the kaonic hydrogen 1s level shift and width

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 03:13 UTC pith:L24OQKWZ

load-bearing objection Genuinely new and more precise kaonic hydrogen shift and width from an established apparatus; the analysis is plausible but needs a closure test before the systematic on the width is fully credible. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.13952 v1 pith:L24OQKWZ submitted 2026-07-15 nucl-ex physics.atom-ph

High-precision measurement of the kaonic hydrogen 1s level shift and width with SIDDHARTA-2

M. Bazzi , F. Clozza , C. Guaraldo , M. A. Iliescu , A. Scordo , F. Sgaramella , D. Sirghi , F. Sirghi
show 32 more authors
J. Zmeskal L. Abbene C. Amsler F. Artibani G. Borghi D. Bosnar M. Bragadireanu A. Buttacavoli M. Carminati A. Clozza L. De Paolis R. Del Grande K. Dulski C. Fiorini I. Fri\v{s}\v{c}i\'c M. Iwasaki A. Khreptak S. Manti J. Marton C. Milardi P. Moskal F. Napolitano H. Ohnishi K. Piscicchia F. Principato M. Silarski M. Skurzok A. Spallone K. Toho M. T\"uchler O. Vazquez Doce C. Curceanu
This is my paper
classification nucl-ex physics.atom-ph
keywords kaonic hydrogen1s level shift1s level widthantikaon-nucleon interactionLambda(1405)X-ray spectroscopystrong interactionSIDDHARTA-2
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Kaonic hydrogen—a hydrogen atom whose electron is replaced by a negatively charged kaon—offers the cleanest experimental access to the strong antikaon-nucleon interaction at very low energy. This paper reports a new X-ray measurement of the shift and width of the atom's 1s state, quantities that directly encode the threshold interaction strength. The extracted values are a shift of -303.0 ± 17.0 eV and a width of 607 ± 62 eV, roughly twice as precise as any previous measurement. If correct, these numbers become the new benchmark for low-energy antikaon-nucleon physics, tightening the derived K⁻p scattering length and thereby constraining models of the Λ(1405) resonance and of few-body kaonic nuclei.

Core claim

The paper claims that SIDDHARTA-2 has achieved the most precise determination of the strong-interaction-induced shift and width of the kaonic hydrogen 1s level: ε₁ₛ = -303.0 ± 17.0 (stat.) ± 2.5 (syst.) eV and Γ₁ₛ = 607 ± 62 (stat.) ± 6 (syst.) eV. These values come from a global chi-squared fit of the K-series X-ray spectrum over 4.2–14.5 keV, in which the kaonic hydrogen lines share a common Voigt profile (common shift and width), contaminant lines are Gaussians, and the residual background is a decaying exponential plus a constant. The resulting complex K⁻p scattering length, a_{K⁻p} = (-0.715 ± 0.054) + i(0.905 ± 0.091) fm, is derived using the improved summed-up Deser formula. The paper

What carries the argument

The central object is the set of kaonic hydrogen X-ray lines (2p→1s K_α, 3d→1s K_β, and unresolved higher-n transitions to the 1s level). A single global fit treats all these lines as Voigt profiles sharing a common intrinsic width Γ₁ₛ and a common energy shift ε₁ₛ, with the electromagnetic transition energies fixed from theory. The detector's energy resolution is parameterized by a Fano factor and electronic noise, both left as free parameters. The measured (ε₁ₛ, Γ₁ₛ) are converted to the complex threshold scattering length a_{K⁻p} via the improved summed-up Deser formula, ε₁ₛ + (i/2)Γ₁ₛ = 2α³μ²a_{K⁻p}[1 + 2αμ(ln α - 1)a_{K⁻p}], which is the bridge to antikaon-nucleon interaction models.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands or falls on the assumption that the fitted spectral model—common Voigt shift and width for all kaonic hydrogen lines, Gaussian contaminants, exponential-plus-constant background, and a Fano-factor resolution parameterization—adequately describes the true spectrum; any unmodeled line asymmetry, resolution error, or background mis-shape would bias both ε₁ₛ and Γ₁ₛ, and the paper provides no synthetic-spectrum or closure test to bound this bias.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be a Monte Carlo closure test: generate a synthetic spectrum with known ε₁ₛ and Γ₁ₛ using the same model, run the identical fit, and verify that the fit recovers the input values; if a bias appears, the quoted uncertainties are underestimated. Alternatively, an in-situ measurement of the detector resolution function using monoenergetic X-ray sources—checking whether the Fano factor and electronic noise values returned by the fit match the calibration data—would quantify the dominant systematic on Γ₁ₛ.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The K⁻p scattering length at threshold is now constrained to roughly ±0.054 (real) and ±0.091 (imaginary) fm—about half the previous uncertainties—giving sharper input for chiral and phenomenological antikaon-nucleon potentials.
  • If the measurement stands, theoretical predictions for the Λ(1405) pole positions must accommodate a narrower experimental window, reducing parameter freedom in models that dynamically generate the resonance.
  • Calculations of kaonic deuterium and the K⁻pp quasi-bound state, which use the same antikaon-nucleon interaction as input, will inherit reduced uncertainties, improving the discriminatory power of ongoing kaonic-nucleus searches.
  • The reduced allowed region in the (ε₁ₛ, Γ₁ₛ) plane, about a factor of three smaller than before, makes direct comparison among competing theoretical models noticeably more decisive.
  • The result provides a new experimental benchmark for low-energy strangeness physics, against which future kaonic-atom measurements can be checked.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the gain in width precision (from 89 eV to 62 eV) may prove more consequential than the gain in shift precision, since the width is more directly sensitive to the imaginary part of the scattering length; future model comparisons may therefore focus on width-driven constraints.
  • A straightforward test of the central result's model dependence would be to re-fit the same spectrum with an alternative background shape or with contaminant lines modeled as Voigt rather than Gaussian; the paper does not report such a closure study, nor does it quote the covariance between ε₁ₛ and Γ₁ₛ.
  • A natural next step is a joint analysis with the upcoming kaonic deuterium measurement: extracting the isospin-dependent scattering lengths a₀ and a₁ using the same detector and analysis chain would yield cleaner separation than combining historical experiments with different systematic uncertainties.
  • Since the systematic error on Γ₁ₛ (6 eV) is an order of magnitude smaller than the statistical error (62 eV), a longer data-taking run could push the total precision further; the paper does not discuss a projected final sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a new measurement of the kaonic hydrogen 1s strong-interaction shift and width by the SIDDHARTA-2 experiment at DAΦNE, using 237 pb^-1 of integrated luminosity. The shift and width are extracted from a global χ² fit of the kaonic hydrogen X-ray spectrum in the 4.2–14.5 keV range, with the K-series lines modeled as Voigt profiles sharing a common intrinsic width and energy shift relative to computed electromagnetic reference energies. The reported values are ε1s = −303.0 ± 17.0 (stat) ± 2.5 (syst) eV and Γ1s = 607 ± 62 (stat) ± 6 (syst) eV. The authors compare these results with previous measurements (SIDDHARTA, KpX, DEAR) and with several theoretical KbarN models, and they derive the K−p scattering length using the improved Deser formula. The paper claims a factor-of-two precision improvement over SIDDHARTA and hence a new benchmark for low-energy KbarN physics.

Significance. If the quoted precision is reliable, this is an important result for kaonic-atom spectroscopy and low-energy strangeness physics. The measurement is performed with a dedicated detector system, uses external electromagnetic reference energies for calibration, and is consistent with previous measurements within uncertainties. The application of the Deser formula is post-fit, so the central measurement is not circular. However, the central 'most precise' claim rests on the validity of a line-shape model that is not independently validated in this Letter, and on systematic uncertainties that do not include several potentially sizable model-related contributions. The paper would be a significant step forward if the missing validation and covariance information were provided; in its current form the precision claim is not fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2, Table 1] The line-shape model includes Voigt profiles for the 2p→1s through 6h→1s transitions only, while the text states that the K-complex is modeled 'up to n=6'. The n≥7 transitions form a Rydberg tail whose series limit is only about 245 eV above the 6h→1s line (8395.9 eV; estimated limit ≈8640 eV from the 2p→1s energy). If this tail is not modeled, it can be absorbed by the common Lorentzian width, the free resolution parameters, and the exponential background. Since the quoted 6 eV systematic on Γ1s is stated to arise mainly from Fano-factor and electronic-noise uncertainties, the truncation of the K-series is an unquantified contribution. Please provide a quantitative study: vary n_max, add an explicit Rydberg-tail component, or perform a synthetic-spectrum closure test, and include the resulting uncertainty in Γ1s.
  2. [§2] The detector energy resolution is parameterized by the Fano factor and electronic noise, both treated as free parameters of the fit, while Γ1s is extracted as an intrinsic Lorentzian width from the same Voigt profiles. In a fit with a broad Lorentzian (Γ≈600 eV) over a background, these parameters are strongly covariant. The paper does not report the correlation between ε1s and Γ1s, nor between Γ1s and the resolution parameters. Without this information, the quoted statistical uncertainty of 62 eV on Γ1s cannot be assessed. Please provide the correlation/covariance matrix, or a profile-likelihood contour in the (ε1s, Γ1s) plane and a check that the Fano/noise parameters converge to physically reasonable values consistent with independent calibration.
  3. [§3, Fig. 1] The central result is obtained from a single χ² fit, but the paper does not report χ²/ndf, nor any cross-checks that would validate the line-shape and background model. No Kα-only vs. full-K-series consistency test, run-by-run comparison, fit-window variation, or alternative-background-model study is shown. The pull plot in Fig. 1 is useful but not sufficient to exclude model bias at the claimed systematic level, especially with the many contaminant lines across 4.2–14.5 keV. Please add these validation tests; a synthetic-spectrum closure test is essential to substantiate a systematic uncertainty of 2.5 eV on ε1s and 6 eV on Γ1s.
  4. [Table 2] The K−p scattering lengths in Table 2 are computed from ε1s and Γ1s via the Deser formula. Since the fit may produce correlated ε1s and Γ1s, and the correlation is not reported, the uncertainties quoted for a_K−p are not fully determined. The full covariance matrix should be propagated, or, if the correlation is negligible, this should be explicitly stated and justified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, §3] The claim of 'approximately a factor-of-two improvement in precision' is accurate for ε1s (36 eV → 17 eV statistical) but not for Γ1s (89 eV → 62 eV statistical, i.e. a factor of about 1.4). The precision claim should be stated separately for the shift and width.
  2. [§2] The text says the K-complex comprises 'unresolved transitions from higher-n states (up to n=6)', but Table 1 lists the 4f, 5g, and 6h transitions separately. Please clarify which lines are actually treated as resolved/unresolved in the fit.
  3. [Fig. 1] Please add the fit range, number of events, and χ²/ndf to the figure caption or text, so readers can judge the fit quality from the pull plot.
  4. [§3] The sentence 'The systematic uncertainty on ε1s is dominated by the energy calibration while other contributions are negligible [34]' refers to a previous paper on kaonic neon. Please specify which contributions were evaluated and give a brief numerical breakdown, or state that this is detailed in a companion paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the kaonic-hydrogen shift and width are free parameters fitted to the measured X-ray spectrum against external electromagnetic reference energies.

full rationale

The central quantities ε1s and Γ1s are not derived from any prior measurement or from each other; they are free parameters of a chi-squared fit to the actual kaonic-hydrogen X-ray spectrum. The transition energies are defined as E = E_em + ε1s, where E_em are fixed electromagnetic reference values computed from the Klein–Gordon equation with independent radiative corrections (Refs. [35–37]), so the energy scale is anchored externally. The common Voigt width Γ1s is likewise a fit parameter describing the strong-interaction broadening, and contaminant lines and background are modeled independently. The Deser-formula scattering length reported in Table 2 is an application of the measured ε1s and Γ1s, not an input to the fit. The calibration uses external Ti, Fe and Cu X-ray lines, not the kaonic-hydrogen lines themselves. The paper does not claim to predict ε1s or Γ1s from a model; it reports a measurement. The skeptic concern about the line-shape model (unvalidated K-complex truncation, free Fano/noise parameters, no closure test) is a possible source of systematic bias and would bear on correctness or robustness, but it is not a circular reduction of the result to its own input: no equation in the paper makes the extracted values equal by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, nor does any load-bearing argument reduce to a self-citation. Self-citations to prior SIDDHARTA-2 technical papers provide setup characterization and calibration details, but the central measurement is self-contained against external electromagnetic references and external calibration lines. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central result is a measurement, so the 'free parameters' are simply the fitted spectral quantities; they are not ad hoc knobs introduced to force a prediction. The main external inputs are the electromagnetic transition energies and the Deser formula. No new particles or mechanisms are invented. The most delicate burden is the assumed line-shape/background model, which is not independently validated in the paper.

free parameters (5)
  • ε1s (kaonic hydrogen 1s shift) = -303.0 ± 17.0 (stat) ± 2.5 (syst) eV
    Free common energy offset in the fit of all kaonic-hydrogen X-ray lines; the central measured quantity.
  • Γ1s (kaonic hydrogen 1s width) = 607 ± 62 (stat) ± 6 (syst) eV
    Common intrinsic Lorentzian width of the kaonic-hydrogen Voigt profiles; the central measured quantity.
  • Fano factor and electronic noise (detector resolution parameters) = not reported
    Free parameters defining the energy-dependent Gaussian resolution in the Voigt/Gaussian profiles; the width extraction depends on them.
  • background shape parameters = not reported
    Amplitude and slope of the decreasing exponential plus constant offset used to model residual DAΦNE background.
  • amplitudes of contaminant lines = not reported
    Gaussian amplitudes for Ti Kα,β; Bi Lα,β; Pb Lβ; and kaonic-atom lines (KC, KN, KO, KAl, KTi) included in the fit.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The improved summed-up Deser formula (Eq. 1) exactly relates ε1s and Γ1s to the complex K−p scattering length a_K−p.
    Used in Table 2 to translate measured values into a scattering length; valid only if the formula from Ref. [7] is exact at this precision.
  • domain assumption The electromagnetic transition energies of kaonic hydrogen in Table 1, computed with Klein–Gordon including vacuum polarization and recoil, are correct and carry negligible uncertainty.
    ε1s is defined relative to these fixed E_em values; an error here directly shifts ε1s.
  • ad hoc to paper Voigt profiles with a common intrinsic width and an energy-dependent resolution parameterized by Fano factor and electronic noise describe the true line shapes, and the residual background is a decreasing exponential plus constant.
    This line-shape/background model is assumed in the fit; no closure test or synthetic-spectrum validation is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper After trigger and timing selections, no unmodeled spectral component lies in the 4.2–14.5 keV fit window that distorts ε1s or Γ1s.
    The listed contaminants are included, but completeness of the list is assumed. This is load-bearing for a precision extraction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9089 in / 14898 out tokens · 149627 ms · 2026-08-02T03:13:36.544883+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Kaonic atoms provide a unique experimental probe of strong interaction in the low-energy regime. In particular, the strong-interaction-induced shift ($\varepsilon_{1\text{s}}$) and width ($\Gamma_{1\text{s}}$) of kaonic hydrogen directly constrain the low-energy antikaon-nucleon ($\bar{K}N$) interaction at threshold and the theoretical description of the $\Lambda$(1405) resonance. We report a new high-precision measurement of kaonic hydrogen X-ray transitions performed by the SIDDHARTA-2 experiment at the DA$\Phi$NE collider (INFN-LNF), based on an integrated luminosity of 237 pb$^{-1}$. The extracted values, $\varepsilon_{1\text{s}}\,=\,-303.0\,\pm\,17.0\,(stat.)\,\pm\,2.5\,(syst.)$ eV and $\Gamma_{1\text{s}}\,=\,607\,\pm\,62\,(stat.)\,\pm\,6\,(syst.)$ eV, represent the most precise determination to date, improving the precision by approximately a factor-of-two with respect to the previous SIDDHARTA measurement. These results significantly tighten the experimental constraints on theoretical description of the low-energy $\bar{K}N$ interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13952 by A. Buttacavoli, A. Clozza, A. Khreptak, A. Scordo, A. Spallone, C. Amsler, C. Curceanu, C. Fiorini, C. Guaraldo, C. Milardi, D. Bosnar, D. Sirghi, F. Artibani, F. Clozza, F. Napolitano, F. Principato, F. Sgaramella, F. Sirghi, G. Borghi, H. Ohnishi, I. Fri\v{s}\v{c}i\'c, J. Marton, J. Zmeskal, K. Dulski, K. Piscicchia, K. Toho, L. Abbene, L. De Paolis, M. A. Iliescu, M. Bazzi, M. Bragadireanu, M. Carminati, M. Iwasaki, M. Silarski, M. Skurzok, M. T\"uchler, O. Vazquez Doce, P. Moskal, R. Del Grande, S. Manti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fit of the kaonic hydrogen energy spectrum after event selection. Global fit (red), kaonic hydrogen lines (blue), residual contaminant lines (dashed black) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the ε1s and Γ1s experimental values of kaonic hy￾drogen measured by SIDDHARTA-2 in comparison to the pre￾vious ones of SIDDHARTA [18], KpX [16] and DEAR [17]. For each experiment, the shaded area indicates the uncertainty region in the two-dimensional (ε1s, Γ1s) plane, centered on the measured values and obtained by combining statistical and sys￾tematic uncertainties in quadrature. Some of the most r… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. D. Rochester, C. C. Butler, Evidence for the Existence of New Unstable Elementary Particles, Nature 160 (1947) 855–857. doi:10.1038/160855a0

    doi:10.1038/160855a0 1947

  2. [2]

    Aebischer, et al., Kaon physics: a cornerstone for future discoveries, J

    J. Aebischer, et al., Kaon physics: a cornerstone for future discoveries, J. Phys. G 52 (2025) 100501. doi:10.1088/ 1361-6471/ae05b4.arXiv:2503.22256

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Curceanu, F

    C. Curceanu, F. Sgaramella, M. Bazzi, T. Hashimoto, M. Iliescu, A. Scordo, D. Sirghi, F. Sirghi, Light kaonic atoms as probes of fundamental interactions in strange systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 147 (2026) 104226. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2026.104226

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Curceanu, et al., The modern era of light kaonic atom experiments, Rev

    C. Curceanu, et al., The modern era of light kaonic atom experiments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 025006. doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.91.025006

    2019

  5. [5]

    N. V . Shevchenko, Three-Body Antikaon–Nucleon Sys- tems, Few Body Syst. 58 (2017) 6. doi:10.1007/ s00601-016-1170-5.arXiv:1608.06126. 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    N. V . Shevchenko, Fine-tuning of the K¯NN and K¯K¯N quasibound state calculations, Phys. Rev. C 112 (2025) 064007. doi:10.1103/wx4d-b252. arXiv:2509.18920

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Cor- rected

    N. V . Shevchenko, Light Kaonic Atoms: From “Cor- rected” to “Summed Up” Deser Formula, Few Body Syst. 63 (2022) 22. doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01727-3. arXiv:2110.03505

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    R. H. Dalitz, S. F. Tuan, A possible resonant state in pion- hyperon scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959) 425–428. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.425

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.2.425 1959

  9. [9]

    Hyodo, D

    T. Hyodo, D. Jido, The nature of the Lambda(1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 55–98. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2011.07.002. arXiv:1104.4474

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  10. [10]

    D. Jido, J. A. Oller, E. Oset, A. Ramos, U. G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics of the two Lambda(1405) states, Nucl. Phys. A 725 (2003) 181–200. doi:10.1016/ S0375-9474(03)01598-7.arXiv:nucl-th/0303062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  11. [11]

    Tanabashi, others (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys

    M. Tanabashi, others (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001. URL:https://pdg.lbl.gov/2019/reviews/ rpp2018-rev-lam-1405-pole-struct.pdf, see mini-review ’Pole Structure of theΛ(1405) Region’ by U.-G. Meißner and T. Hyodo

    2018

  12. [12]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, Constraints on the chiral uni- tary ¯KNamplitude fromπΣK + photoproduction data, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 30. doi:10.1140/epja/ i2015-15030-3.arXiv:1411.7884

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    P. M. Bird, A. S. Clough, K. R. Parker, G. J. Pyle, G. T. A. Squier, S. Baird, C. J. Batty, A. I. Kilving- ton, F. M. Russell, P. Sharman, KAONIC HYDROGEN ATOM X-RAYS, Nucl. Phys. A 404 (1983) 482–494. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(83)90272-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(83)90272-5 1983

  14. [14]

    Izycki, et al., Results of the Search forKSeries X-rays From Kaonic Hydrogen, Z

    M. Izycki, et al., Results of the Search forKSeries X-rays From Kaonic Hydrogen, Z. Phys. A 297 (1980) 11–15. doi:10.1007/BF01414238

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01414238 1980

  15. [15]

    J. D. Davies, G. J. Pyle, G. T. A. Squier, C. J. Batty, S. F. Biagi, S. D. Hoath, P. Sharman, A. S. Clough, OBSERV ATION OF KAONIC HYDROGEN ATOM X- RAYS, Phys. Lett. B 83 (1979) 55–58. doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(79)90887-6

    1979

  16. [16]

    Iwasaki, et al., Observation of the kaonic hydrogen K(alpha) x-ray, Phys

    M. Iwasaki, et al., Observation of the kaonic hydrogen K(alpha) x-ray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3067–3069. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3067

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3067 1997

  17. [17]

    Beer, et al

    G. Beer, et al. (DEAR), Measurement of the kaonic hydro- gen X-ray spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 212302. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.212302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.212302 2005

  18. [18]

    Bazzi, et al

    M. Bazzi, et al. (SIDDHARTA), A New Measure- ment of Kaonic Hydrogen X-rays, Phys. Lett. B 704 (2011) 113–117. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09. 011.arXiv:1105.3090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Milardi, et al., Preparation Activity for the SIDDHARTA-2 Run at DAΦNE, in: 9th International Particle Accelerator Confer- ence, IPAC2018, Vancouver BC Canada, 2018

    C. Milardi, et al., Preparation Activity for the SIDDHARTA-2 Run at DAΦNE, in: 9th International Particle Accelerator Confer- ence, IPAC2018, Vancouver BC Canada, 2018. doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2018-MOPMF088

    doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2018-mopmf088 2018

  20. [20]

    Milardi, et al., DAΦNE Commission- ing for SIDDHARTA-2 Experiment, JACoW IPAC2021 (2021) TUPAB001

    C. Milardi, et al., DAΦNE Commission- ing for SIDDHARTA-2 Experiment, JACoW IPAC2021 (2021) TUPAB001. doi:10.18429/ JACoW-IPAC2021-TUPAB001

    2021

  21. [21]

    Zobov, et al., Test of crab-waist collisions at DAFNE Phi factory, Phys

    M. Zobov, et al., Test of crab-waist collisions at DAFNE Phi factory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 174801. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.104.174801

    2010

  22. [22]

    Mai, Review of theΛ(1405) A curious case of a strangeness resonance, Eur

    M. Mai, Review of theΛ(1405) A curious case of a strangeness resonance, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (2021) 1593–

    2021

  23. [23]

    L. D. Faddeev, The Resolvent of the Schrodinger operator for a system of three particles interacting in pairs, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 6 (1961) 384–386

    1961

  24. [24]

    E. O. Alt, P. Grassberger, W. Sandhas, Reduction of the three - particle collision problem to multichannel two - particle Lippmann-Schwinger equations, Nucl. Phys. B 2 (1967) 167–180. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(67) 90016-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(67 1967

  25. [25]

    Révai, N

    J. Révai, N. V . Shevchenko, Faddeev calculations of the ¯KNNsystem with chirally motivated ¯KNinterac- tion. II. TheK −ppquasibound state, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 034004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.034004. arXiv:1403.0757

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Ajimura, et al

    S. Ajimura, et al. (J-PARC E15), ”K − pp”, a K-Meson Nuclear Bound State, Observed in 3He(K−,Λp)nReac- tions, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 620–625. doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2018.12.058.arXiv:1805.12275

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Yamaga, et al

    T. Yamaga, et al. (J-PARC E15), Observation of a ¯KNNbound state in the 3He(K−,Λp)nreaction, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 044002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 102.044002.arXiv:2006.13433

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  28. [29]

    Miliucci, et al., Large area silicon drift detectors sys- tem for high precision timed x-ray spectroscopy, Measur

    M. Miliucci, et al., Large area silicon drift detectors sys- tem for high precision timed x-ray spectroscopy, Measur. Sci. Tech. 33 (2022) 095502. doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ ac777a. 5

    doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ 2022

  29. [30]

    Sirghi, et al., SIDDHARTA-2 apparatus for kaonic atoms research on the DAΦNE collider, JINST 19 (2024) P11006

    F. Sirghi, et al., SIDDHARTA-2 apparatus for kaonic atoms research on the DAΦNE collider, JINST 19 (2024) P11006. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/ P11006.arXiv:2311.16144

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [31]

    Sgaramella, et al., Characterization of the SIDDHARTA-2 Setup via the Kaonic Helium Mea- surement, Condens

    F. Sgaramella, et al., Characterization of the SIDDHARTA-2 Setup via the Kaonic Helium Mea- surement, Condens. Mat. 9 (2024) 16. doi:10.3390/ condmat9010016

    2024

  31. [32]

    Milardi, et al., DAFNE operation strategy for the obser- vation of the kaonic deuterium, JACoW IPAC2024 (2024) WEPR17

    C. Milardi, et al., DAFNE operation strategy for the obser- vation of the kaonic deuterium, JACoW IPAC2024 (2024) WEPR17. doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2024-WEPR17

    doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2024-wepr17 2024

  32. [33]

    Boscolo, P

    M. Boscolo, P. Raimondi, E. Paoloni, A. Perez, Touschek effect at DAFNE for the new KLOE run in the crab-waist scheme, Conf. Proc. C 110904 (2011) 2262–2264

    2011

  33. [34]

    Sgaramella, et al., High precision X-ray spec- troscopy of kaonic neon, Phys

    F. Sgaramella, et al., High precision X-ray spec- troscopy of kaonic neon, Phys. Lett. B 865 (2025) 139492. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139492. arXiv:2412.16101

    arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    J. P. Santos, F. Parente, S. Boucard, P. Indelicato, J. P. Desclaux, X-ray energies of circular transitions and electrons screening in kaonic atoms, Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 032501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032501. arXiv:physics/0408106

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  35. [36]

    S. G. Karshenboim, V . G. Ivanov, E. Y . Korzinin, Vacuum polarization in muonic atoms: The Lamb shift at low and medium Z, Eur. Phys. J. D 39 (2006) 351–358. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2006-00133-0. arXiv:physics/0604133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [37]

    S. G. Karshenboim, E. Y . Korzinin, V . G. Ivanov, The Uehling correction to the energy levels in a pionic atom, Can. J. Phys. 84 (2006) 107. doi:10.1139/P06-010. arXiv:physics/0510079

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [38]

    Perotti, C

    F. Perotti, C. Fiorini, Observed energy dependence of Fano factor in silicon at hard X-ray energies, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 423 (1999) 356–363

    1999

  38. [39]

    Gysel, P

    M. Gysel, P. Lemberge, P. Van Espen, Implementation of a spectrum fitting procedure using a robust peak model, X-Ray Spectrometry 32 (2003) 434 – 441. doi:10.1002/ xrs.666

    2003

  39. [40]

    Ikeda, T

    Y . Ikeda, T. Hyodo, W. Weise, Chiral SU(3) the- ory of antikaon-nucleon interactions with improved threshold constraints, Nucl. Phys. A 881 (2012) 98–114. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.01.029. arXiv:1201.6549

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [41]

    Cieply, J

    A. Cieply, J. Smejkal, Chirally motivated ¯KNam- plitudes for in-medium applications, Nucl. Phys. A 881 (2012) 115–126. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa. 2012.01.028.arXiv:1112.0917

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [42]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, Meson-baryon reactions with strangeness -1 within a chiral framework, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 035202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.035202. arXiv:1210.3485

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [43]

    Mai, U.-G

    M. Mai, U.-G. Meissner, New insights into antikaon- nucleon scattering and the structure of the Lambda(1405), Nucl. Phys. A 900 (2013) 51 – 64. doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2013.01.032.arXiv:1202.2030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [44]

    Feijoo, V

    A. Feijoo, V . Magas, A. Ramos,S=−1 meson-baryon in- teraction and the role of isospin filtering processes, Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 035211. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99. 035211.arXiv:1810.07600

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [45]

    Mizutani, C

    T. Mizutani, C. Fayard, B. Saghai, K. Tsushima, Faddeev- chiral unitary approach to the K−d scattering length, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 035201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87. 035201.arXiv:1211.5824. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  45. [1607]

    arXiv:2010.00056

    doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00144-7. arXiv:2010.00056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010