Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Helium escaping from the atmosphere of a nearby rocky exoplanet orbiting in a habitable zone

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the detection of metastable helium escaping from the rocky habitable-zone exoplanet LHS 1140b, with absorption present in 2024 and absent in 2025, and interprets the outflow as helium-dominated and hydrogen-depleted.

desk verdict A convincing first detection of helium escape from a rocky habitable-zone planet, but the 'hydrogen-depleted' interpretation is more conditional than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14326 v1 pith:SK7ALWPP submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.EP
keywords metastableheliumatmosphericescaperockyexoplanetLHS1140bhabitablezonetransmissionspectroscopyXUV-drivenhelium-dominatedatmosphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

LHS 1140b, a rocky planet in the habitable zone of a nearby M dwarf, shows absorption from metastable helium during its 2024 transit, making it one of the first rocky exoplanets with a detected atmospheric escape signal. The same feature is absent in 2025, so the escape is time-variable. Modeling the line profile with a one-dimensional isothermal outflow yields a mass-loss rate of roughly 2–4×10^8 g/s and a hydrogen-to-helium ratio near 10^-3, implying the escaping upper atmosphere is dominated by helium and depleted in hydrogen. The authors argue this matches predictions of escape-driven fractionation, in which lighter hydrogen is preferentially lost and heavier volatiles are trapped below. If correct, the result shows that temperate rocky planets can retain detectable outflows and that single-epoch non-detections do not prove an atmosphere is absent.

What carries the argument

The central probe is the metastable helium triplet at 10,833 Å, a near-infrared absorption feature that traces the extended, escaping upper atmosphere of a planet; the two red components are blended at the instrument resolution, and their amplitude ratio (measured 6.7, expected 8) confirms the line identification. The physical model is a one-dimensional, isothermal Parker wind, which converts an assumed stellar XUV spectrum, an escape rate, a temperature, and an H:He ratio into a predicted helium line profile. The key constraint is ionization balance: at H:He ≳0.01, neutral hydrogen absorbs the stellar flux below 911 Å, starving the helium ionization–recombination cycle that populates metast

What would settle it

A direct EUV observation of LHS 1140 (e.g., 100–911 Å) showing a flux more than about ten times the scaled analogue-star values would falsify the hydrogen-depleted outflow, because hydrogen would then absorb the ionizing flux and suppress metastable helium; conversely, a 2025-style non-detection coinciding with a measured drop in stellar XUV would support the variability interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

During a 6.5-hour observation on 2024 September 23, the authors detected the metastable helium triplet at 10,833 Å in the transmission spectrum of LHS 1140b, with a blended-line absorption depth of 1.24% and a Doppler shift consistent with the planet's motion, plus a leading tail of absorption before ingress. The inferred opaque radius is 1.52 planetary radii. A re-observation in 2025 showed no helium absorption, with a 0.6% detection limit, indicating the escape signal varies between epochs. Using a spherically symmetric, isothermal Parker-wind model, the authors retrieve an atmospheric mass-loss rate of 2.0–4.2×10^8 g/s, an outflow temperature near 5000–5900 K, and a hydrogen-to-helium rat

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the unmeasured extreme-ultraviolet spectrum of LHS 1140 being accurately represented by scaling two similar M dwarfs' spectra to the star's X-ray flux; if the true EUV flux or its spectral shape differs, the retrieved hydrogen-to-helium ratio and the helium-dominated conclusion could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ground-based monitoring of metastable helium can reveal atmospheric escape from temperate rocky planets, not just hot gas giants, and can do so from the ground.
  • A single non-detection of helium is not evidence that a rocky planet is airless; the 2024–2025 variation shows escape can switch on and off.
  • If helium-dominated upper atmospheres are common among temperate rocky planets, transmission spectra will show small scale heights and muted hydrogen features, making such atmospheres harder to detect in the optical/UV.
  • The inferred escape rate (~2–4×10^8 g/s) is far below the ~5×10^9 g/s threshold that would strip a 1.5% primordial atmosphere over the system's age, so LHS 1140b's atmosphere can persist.
  • The non-detection for LHS 1140c, which sits on the other side of the cosmic shoreline, supports the idea that irradiation drives the divide between airless and atmosphere-bearing rocky planets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the hydrogen depletion holds, the same technique could be used to search for helium outflows around other habitable-zone M-dwarf planets, effectively using helium as a proxy for an atmosphere that might otherwise be invisible.
  • The year-to-year variability could reflect an activity cycle of the host star rather than intrinsic atmospheric changes; monitoring over several years would distinguish a stellar-cycle modulation from a stochastic escape event.
  • A direct measurement of the star's EUV spectrum would be the sharpest test of the hydrogen-depletion claim; for now, the conclusion rests on scaled spectra of analogue stars.
  • The crossover-mass argument implies that any water in the planet's interior would be cold-trapped and retained, so a helium-dominated outflow is compatible with a water-rich bulk composition—connecting this detection to the water-world interpretation of LHS 1140b's density.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. Cherubim et al. report ground-based WINERED/Magellan transit spectroscopy of the M-dwarf system LHS 1140. They detect a 1.24 ± 0.22% metastable helium absorption feature at 10,833 Å during the 2024 transit of the habitable-zone rocky planet LHS 1140b, confirm the detection with an independent re-reduction, and do not detect the feature in a 2025 transit of the same planet or in the transit of the inner planet LHS 1140c. Using the p-winds code, they retrieve mass-loss rates of 2–4×10^8 g/s and H:He ratios of ~1×10^-3, leading them to interpret the upper atmosphere as helium-dominated and hydrogen-depleted. They also discuss variable escape, a leading/trailing tail, and consistency with the cosmic shoreline.

Significance. If the compositional interpretation holds, this is a landmark observation: direct evidence of escaping helium from a rocky, habitable-zone exoplanet, with implications for atmospheric retention, fractionation, and the cosmic shoreline. The paper's concrete strengths are the robust 2024 detection (confirmed by an independent pipeline), the careful exclusion of telluric, flare, and transit-light-source contamination, and the public data/code archive. The central weakness is that the helium-dominated/hydrogen-depleted conclusion relies on a p-winds retrieval whose input XUV SED is not directly measured; the only sensitivity test scales the entire SED, leaving the EUV/X-ray ratio unvaried. This makes the compositional claim less robust than the escape detection itself.

major comments (2)
  1. [Materials and Methods, 'X-ray observations and analysis' and 'Retrieving atmospheric properties'; Figs. S4, 5, S5, S6] The helium-dominated conclusion rests on the p-winds retrieval, whose input XUV SED is constructed by scaling the GJ 1132 and GJ 699 Mega-MUSCLES SEDs to the X-ray flux from a blended XMM detection (A=0.59 and 0.056). The EUV band (≈100–911 Å) that drives He ionization is not observed for LHS 1140 and is assumed to follow the adopted template ratio. The only sensitivity test multiplies the entire SED by 10, preserving the EUV/X-ray ratio. Because the H:He constraint is set by hydrogen attenuation of EUV, an independent EUV variation could relax the constraint. I request retrievals that vary the EUV segment independently (e.g., 0.1–10×) while holding the X-ray normalization fixed, or a formal justification that the adopted templates bracket the plausible SED space. In addition, the GJ 699 run's stability boundary is H:He ≥ 1×10^-3, and the posterior in Fig. S6 is truncated near that bound
  2. [Variable helium escape; Fig. 4] The abstract states that the 2024 detection and 2025 non-detection indicate time-variable atmospheric escape. However, the paper does not quantify the probability of the 2025 non-detection under the 2024 best-fit model: Fig. 4 shows example models with low XUV flux or high T_wind falling below the 0.6% limit, but no posterior predictive distribution is computed. No X-ray observation of LHS 1140 between the two epochs is presented. To support 'time-variable atmospheric escape' as a measured result rather than a plausible speculation, the authors should (a) compute the fraction of posterior predictive realizations with XUV and T_wind varied over the adopted ranges that yield absorption below the 2025 limit, or (b) soften the abstract and conclusion to state that the non-detection could be due to variable escape, stellar activity, or other effects.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table S1] The quoted Galactic neutral hydrogen column density reads NH = 7.4^{+5.1}_{-4.9}×10^-8 cm^-2; the exponent should likely be 10^18, based on the text and the allowed range 0–4.6×10^18 cm^-2.
  2. [Spectroscopic observations of LHS 1140] The text says 'thermal broadening dominates over instrumental and natural broadening' but the observed FWHM is 23.9 km/s, far larger than thermal broadening for helium at T≈5000–5800 K. The line width is plausibly dominated by the radial velocity gradient in the outflow; please rephrase to avoid a misleading statement.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] Typo: '1σ and 3σ derivations' should be 'deviations'. Also, the caption's description of the 10× XUV flux points ('Data points with dotted error bars') could state explicitly that this is the only SED-sensitivity test.
  4. [Atmospheric composition] The abstract says 'other volatile species trapped at lower altitudes'; the text discusses cold trapping (e.g., water) and crossover-mass dragging. 'Cold-trapped' or 'concentrated at lower altitudes' would be more precise, since the mechanism differs for different species.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: helium detection is independent observational evidence, the p-winds retrieval uses free parameters fit to the spectrum, and the only self-citation is a non-load-bearing consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is observational and forward-model based. The 2024 helium detection (1.24% excess absorption at 10,833 Å) is an independent measurement, checked by an independent re-reduction and by tests against telluric, flare, and transit-light-source contamination. The atmospheric properties (mass-loss rate, H:He ratio, outflow temperature, wind velocity) are free parameters in a p-winds forward model, fit with MCMC to the observed transmission spectrum; they are not defined in terms of the conclusion being drawn. The hydrogen-depleted interpretation follows from the retrieved low H:He ratio and the model's physical prediction that higher H:He would suppress metastable helium production, which is a physical inference rather than a tautology. The energy-limited mass-loss comparison uses a separate published formula, not the same fit. The 2025 non-detection is a real null result, and the variability interpretation is presented as one possible explanation with model tests. The one self-citation (Cherubim et al. 2025, ref 39) is used only to note consistency with a previous prediction after the retrieval has been performed; it is not load-bearing for the detection, the retrieval, or the variability conclusion. The scaling of GJ 1132/GJ 699 SEDs to the X-ray flux is an input assumption, and the robustness of the hydrogen-depleted conclusion to unobserved EUV SED shape could be questioned, but that is a model-uncertainty/correctness concern, not circularity. No step reduces, by construction or definition, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard radiative-transfer/wind modeling plus a modest set of fitted parameters. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main assumptions are the 1D wind geometry and the scaled SED used to infer the helium-dominated composition.

free parameters (7)
  • Mass-loss rate M_dot = 2.03+0.67/-0.58×10^8 g/s (GJ1132 SED); 4.22+1.14/-1.00×10^8 g/s (GJ699 SED)
    Free parameter in the p-winds MCMC retrieval of the 2024 transmission spectrum.
  • H:He atomic ratio = ≈1.0×10^-3
    Free parameter in the p-winds fit; drives the helium-dominated upper atmosphere interpretation.
  • Outflow temperature T_wind = 5160+46/-50 K (GJ1132); 5850+78/-82 K (GJ699)
    Free parameter in the p-winds retrieval.
  • Line-of-sight wind velocity v_wind = 2260+330/-300 m/s
    Free parameter in the p-winds retrieval; the Gaussian line-profile model gives a Doppler shift of 2.0 km/s.
  • SED normalization factors A_699 and A_1132 = 0.056 and 0.59
    Chosen so that the integrated X-ray flux of the template SED matches the measured LHS 1140 X-ray flux; uncertainty in the unobserved EUV propagates into H:He and mass-loss.
  • Tropopause pressure P_trop = 0.1 bar (assumed)
    Used for the water cold-trap/f_H2O estimate; not central to the escape claim but affects a quantitative side claim.
  • Gaussian line profile parameters = Amp1≈4.7%, Amp2≈15%, Amp3≈16%, sigma≈0.367 Å, shift≈0.072 Å
    Descriptive decomposition of the helium triplet; not central to the escape interpretation but part of the detection characterization.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption p-winds 1D isothermal Parker-wind model adequately represents the outflow
    Authors assume spherical homogeneous outflow and cite previous work for validity when stellar wind interactions are mild; if 3D structure matters, retrieved parameters change.
  • domain assumption XUV SED of LHS 1140 is represented by GJ 699 or GJ 1132 SED scaled to measured X-ray flux
    The EUV portion is unobserved; the SED normalization is a key input to the p-winds H:He and mass-loss retrieval.
  • domain assumption Standard metastable helium line formation and telluric/sky models
    Relies on established recombination/photoionization physics, HITRAN telluric models, and known helium triplet rest wavelengths.
  • domain assumption The 2024 excess absorption is planetary rather than stellar, telluric, or systematic
    Authors exclude flares, TLS, and telluric contamination, but the RV-follows-planet test is only ~2σ significant, so planetary origin remains an assumption.
  • standard math MCMC and Gaussian-process statistical methods produce unbiased uncertainties
    Standard Bayesian framework; correlated noise is modeled with a Matérn-3/2 kernel.
  • domain assumption LHS 1140 system age >3 Gyr and initial atmosphere 1.5% of planetary mass
    Used to argue the present-day escape rate is an upper limit on the historical rate; not central to the detection.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Helium escaping from the atmosphere of a nearby rocky exoplanet orbiting in a habitable zone." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SK7ALWPP

@misc{pith2026260714326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Helium escaping from the atmosphere of a nearby rocky exoplanet orbiting in a habitable zone},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SK7ALWPP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14326}
}
read the original abstract

Observations of highly irradiated gas giant exoplanets have shown helium escaping from their atmospheres. There is limited evidence for atmospheres on rocky exoplanets, perhaps because they have already escaped. We report spectroscopic observations of LHS 1140b, a rocky exoplanet that orbits in the habitable zone of a nearby low-mass star. The near-infrared transit spectra show absorption by helium escaping from the planet's atmosphere. Helium absorption is detected in 2024 but not in 2025, indicating time-variable atmospheric escape. We interpret these results as indicating an upper atmosphere dominated by helium and depleted in hydrogen, with other volatile species trapped at lower altitudes, consistent with atmospheric fractionation models. No helium absorption is detected for LHS 1140c, a smaller and more heavily irradiated exoplanet in the same system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. No Helium Detected in LHS 1140 b from Four JWST NIRISS/SOSS Transits

    astro-ph.EP 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Four JWST NIRISS/SOSS transits detect no metastable helium absorption on LHS 1140 b, rejecting the reported ground-based detection at more than 3 sigma per visit and about 10 sigma combined.

  2. Intense but Harmless: Exo-Space Weather Around an M Dwarf with a Single-Hemisphere Dynamo

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulations show that a single-hemisphere, high-latitude-polarity-inversion magnetic topology on a moderately rotating M dwarf would produce mostly high-latitude CMEs and only mild CME-driven pressure enhancements at ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. F. Kasting, D. P. Whitmire, R. T. Reynolds, Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars. Icarus101(1), 108–128 (1993), doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1010

  2. [2]

    Wordsworth, L

    R. Wordsworth, L. Kreidberg, Atmospheres of Rocky Exoplanets.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.60, 159–201 (2022), doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-125632

  3. [3]

    J.568(1), 377–384 (2002), doi:10.1086/338770

    D.Charbonneau,T.M.Brown,R.W.Noyes,R.L.Gilliland,DetectionofanExtrasolarPlanet Atmosphere.Astrophys. J.568(1), 377–384 (2002), doi:10.1086/338770

  4. [4]

    N.Madhusudhan,ExoplanetaryAtmospheres:KeyInsights,Challenges,andProspects.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.57, 617–663 (2019), doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051846

  5. [5]

    K. J. Zahnle, D. C. Catling, The Cosmic Shoreline: The Evidence that Escape Determines whichPlanetsHaveAtmospheres,andwhatthisMayMeanforProximaCentauriB.Astrophys. J.843(2), 122 (2017), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7846

  6. [6]

    E. K. Pass, D. Charbonneau, A. Vanderburg, The Receding Cosmic Shoreline of Mid-to-late M Dwarfs: Measurements of Active Lifetimes Worsen Challenges for Atmosphere Retention byRockyExoplanets.Astrophys.J.Lett.986(1),L3(2025),doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adda39

  7. [7]

    H.Diamond-Lowe,J.M.Mendonça,D.Charbonneau,L.A.Buchhave,Ground-basedOptical Transmission Spectroscopy of the Nearby Terrestrial Exoplanet LTT 1445Ab.Astron. J. 165(4), 169 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbf39

  8. [8]

    R.Hu,etal.,Asecondaryatmosphereontherockyexoplanet55Cancrie.Nature630(8017), 609–612 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07432-x

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    A.Glidden,etal.,JWST-TSTDREAMS:SecondaryAtmosphereConstraintsfortheHabitable ZonePlanetTRAPPIST-1e.Astrophys.J.Lett.990(2),L53(2025),doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ adf62e

  2. [10]

    Fortune,et al., Hot Rocks Survey: III

    M. Fortune,et al., Hot Rocks Survey: III. A deep eclipse for LHS 1140c and a new Gaussian process method to account for correlated noise in individual pixels.Astron. Astrophys.701, A25 (2025), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554198. 14

  3. [11]

    J. K. Teske,et al., A Thick Volatile Atmosphere on the Ultrahot Super-Earth TOI-561 b. Astrophys. J. Lett.995(2), L39 (2025), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a4c

  4. [12]

    J. A. Dittmann,et al., A temperate rocky super-Earth transiting a nearby cool star.Nature 544(7650), 333–336 (2017), doi:10.1038/nature22055

  5. [13]

    Cadieux,et al., New Mass and Radius Constraints on the LHS 1140 Planets: LHS 1140 b Is either a Temperate Mini-Neptune or a Water World.Astrophys

    C. Cadieux,et al., New Mass and Radius Constraints on the LHS 1140 Planets: LHS 1140 b Is either a Temperate Mini-Neptune or a Water World.Astrophys. J. Lett.960(1), L3 (2024), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1691

  6. [14]

    J.157(1), 32 (2019), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf1b1

    K.Ment,etal.,ASecondTerrestrialPlanetOrbitingtheNearbyMDwarfLHS1140.Astron. J.157(1), 32 (2019), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaf1b1

  7. [15]

    E. K. Pass,et al., The Mass Dependence of H𝛼Emission and Stellar Spindown for Fully Convective M Dwarfs.Astrophys. J.966(2), 231 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3631

  8. [16]

    J.935(2), 104 (2022), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac77f9

    A.A.Medina,J.G.Winters,J.M.Irwin,D.Charbonneau,GalacticKinematicsandObserved Flare Rates of a Volume-complete Sample of Mid-to-late M Dwarfs: Constraints on the HistoryoftheStellarRadiationEnvironmentofPlanetsOrbitingLow-massStars.Astrophys. J.935(2), 104 (2022), doi:10.3847/1...

  9. [17]

    Hamano,et al., WARP: The Data Reduction Pipeline for the WINERED Spectrograph

    S. Hamano,et al., WARP: The Data Reduction Pipeline for the WINERED Spectrograph. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.136(1), 014504 (2024), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad1b38

  10. [18]

    Materials and methods are available as supplementary material

  11. [19]

    G. W. F. Drake, High Precision Calculations for Helium, inAtomic, Molecular, & Opti- cal Physics Handbook(American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, New York), pp. 154–171 (1996)

  12. [20]

    de Jager, O

    C. de Jager, O. Namba, L. Neven, The profile of the infrared He I lines over the undisturbed solar disk.Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth.18, 128 (1966)

  13. [21]

    G.W.Drake,TheoryofRelativisticMagneticDipoleTransitions:LifetimeoftheMetastable 23SStateoftheHeliumlikeIons.Phys.Rev.A3(3),908–915(1971),doi:10.1103/PhysRevA. 3.908. 15

  14. [22]

    Czesla,et al., H𝛼and He I absorption in HAT-P-32 b observed with CARMENES

    S. Czesla,et al., H𝛼and He I absorption in HAT-P-32 b observed with CARMENES. Detection of Roche lobe overflow and mass loss.Astron. Astrophys.657, A6 (2022), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039919

  15. [23]

    Gully-Santiago,et al., A Large and Variable Leading Tail of Helium in a Hot Saturn Un- dergoing Runaway Inflation.Astron

    M. Gully-Santiago,et al., A Large and Variable Leading Tail of Helium in a Hot Saturn Un- dergoing Runaway Inflation.Astron. J.167(4), 142 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad1ee8

  16. [24]

    Krishnamurthy,et al., Continuous helium absorption from both the leading and trailing tails of WASP-107 b.Nat

    V. Krishnamurthy,et al., Continuous helium absorption from both the leading and trailing tails of WASP-107 b.Nat. Astron.10, 258–270 (2026), doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02710-8

  17. [25]

    Matsakos, A

    T. Matsakos, A. Uribe, A. Königl, Classification of magnetized star-planet interactions: bow shocks, tails, and inspiraling flows.Astron. Astrophys.578, A6 (2015), doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201425593

  18. [26]

    McCann, R

    J. McCann, R. A. Murray-Clay, K. Kratter, M. R. Krumholz, Morphology of Hydrodynamic Winds:AStudyofPlanetaryWindsinStellarEnvironments.Astrophys.J.873(1),89(2019), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab05b8

  19. [27]

    R. A. Murray-Clay, E. I. Chiang, N. Murray, Atmospheric Escape From Hot Jupiters.Astro- phys. J.693(1), 23–42 (2009), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/23

  20. [28]

    L.A.DosSantos,etal.,p-winds:Anopen-sourcePythoncodetomodelplanetaryoutflowsand upperatmospheres.Astron.Astrophys.659,A62(2022),doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142038

  21. [29]

    E.N.Parker,DynamicsoftheInterplanetaryGasandMagneticFields.Astrophys.J.128,664 (1958), doi:10.1086/146579

  22. [30]

    Astrophys.663, A122 (2022), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142763

    A.Caldiroli,etal.,Irradiation-drivenescapeofprimordialplanetaryatmospheres.II.Evapo- ration efficiency of sub-Neptunes through hot Jupiters.Astron. Astrophys.663, A122 (2022), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142763

  23. [31]

    Ginzburg, H

    S. Ginzburg, H. E. Schlichting, R. Sari, Super-Earth Atmospheres: Self-consistent Gas Ac- cretion and Retention.Astrophys. J.825(1), 29 (2016), doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/29. 16

  24. [32]

    Ginzburg, H

    S. Ginzburg, H. E. Schlichting, R. Sari, Core-powered mass-loss and the radius distribution of small exoplanets.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476(1), 759–765 (2018), doi:10.1093/mnras/ sty290

  25. [33]

    Peacock,et al., HAZMAT VI: The Evolution of Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Emitted from Early M Stars.Astrophys

    S. Peacock,et al., HAZMAT VI: The Evolution of Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation Emitted from Early M Stars.Astrophys. J.895(1), 5 (2020), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab893a

  26. [34]

    Diamond-Lowe, Z

    H. Diamond-Lowe, Z. Berta-Thompson, D. Charbonneau, J. Dittmann, E. M. R. Kempton, Simultaneous Optical Transmission Spectroscopy of a Terrestrial, Habitable-zone Exoplanet with Two Ground-based Multiobject Spectrographs.Astron. J.160(1), 27 (2020), doi:10. 3847/1538-3881/ab935f

  27. [35]

    J.161(1), 44 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abc6a5

    B.Edwards,etal.,HubbleWFC3SpectroscopyoftheHabitable-zoneSuper-EarthLHS1140 b.Astron. J.161(1), 44 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abc6a5

  28. [36]

    Cadieux,et al., Transmission Spectroscopy of the Habitable Zone Exoplanet LHS 1140 b with JWST/NIRISS.Astrophys

    C. Cadieux,et al., Transmission Spectroscopy of the Habitable Zone Exoplanet LHS 1140 b with JWST/NIRISS.Astrophys. J. Lett.970(1), L2 (2024), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5afa

  29. [37]

    Damiano, A

    M. Damiano, A. Bello-Arufe, J. Yang, R. Hu, LHS 1140 b Is a Potentially Habitable Water World.Astrophys. J. Lett.968(2), L22 (2024), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5204

  30. [38]

    A.Biagini,etal.,AreanalysisoftheLHS1140batmosphereobservedwiththeHubbleSpace Telescope.Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.530(1),1054–1065(2024),doi:10.1093/mnras/stae823

  31. [39]

    Cherubim,et al., An Oxidation Gradient Straddling the Small Planet Radius Valley

    C. Cherubim,et al., An Oxidation Gradient Straddling the Small Planet Radius Valley. Astrophys. J.983(2), 97 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbca9

  32. [40]

    R. Hu, S. Seager, Y. L. Yung, Helium Atmospheres on Warm Neptune- and Sub-Neptune- sized Exoplanets and Applications to GJ 436b.Astrophys. J.807(1), 8 (2015), doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/807/1/8

  33. [41]

    Astron.9, 1022–1030 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02550-6

    H.Lammer,etal.,Earth-massplanetswithHeatmospheresinthehabitablezoneofSun-like stars.Nat. Astron.9, 1022–1030 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02550-6

  34. [42]

    J.Brande,etal.,CloudsandClarity:RevisitingAtmosphericFeatureTrendsinNeptune-size Exoplanets.Astrophys. J. Lett.961(1), L23 (2024), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1b5c. 17

  35. [43]

    D. M. Hunten, R. O. Pepin, J. C. G. Walker, Mass fractionation in hydrodynamic escape. Icarus69(3), 532–549 (1987), doi:10.1016/0019-1035(87)90022-4

  36. [44]

    R. T. Pierrehumbert,Principles of Planetary Climate(Cambridge University Press) (2010)

  37. [45]

    T. D. Robinson, D. C. Catling, An analytic radiative–convective model for planetary atmo- spheres.Astrophys. J.757(1), 104 (2012), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/104

  38. [46]

    L. Qian, S. C. Solomon, Thermospheric Density: An Overview of Temporal and Spatial Variations.Space Sci. Rev.168(1-4), 147–173 (2012), doi:10.1007/s11214-011-9810-z

  39. [47]

    W. G. Levine,et al., Exoplanet Aeronomy: A Case Study of WASP-69 b’s Variable Thermo- sphere.Astron. J.168(2), 65 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad5354

  40. [48]

    Pillitteri,et al., Long-term X-ray variability of the multiple-planet host L 98-59: Hints of an activity cycle.Astron

    I. Pillitteri,et al., Long-term X-ray variability of the multiple-planet host L 98-59: Hints of an activity cycle.Astron. Astrophys.705, L2 (2026), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555853

  41. [49]

    Cherubim, LHS 1140 WINERED Spectra 2024B, 2025B, version 3, Zenodo (2026), doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20723095

    C. Cherubim, LHS 1140 WINERED Spectra 2024B, 2025B, version 3, Zenodo (2026), doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20723095

  42. [50]

    Y. Ikeda,et al., High sensitivity, wide coverage, and high-resolution NIR non-cryogenic spectrograph,WINERED,inGround-basedandAirborneInstrumentationforAstronomyVI, C.J.Evans,L.Simard,H.Takami,Eds.,vol.9908ofSocietyofPhoto-OpticalInstrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Ser...

  43. [51]

    Ikeda,et al., Highly Sensitive, Non-cryogenic NIR High-resolution Spectrograph, WINERED.Publ

    Y. Ikeda,et al., Highly Sensitive, Non-cryogenic NIR High-resolution Spectrograph, WINERED.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.134(1031), 015004 (2022), doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ ac1c5f

  44. [52]

    S. Otsubo,et al., First high-efficiency and high-resolution (R=80,000) NIR spectroscopy withhigh-blazedEchellegrating:WINEREDHIRESmodes,inGround-basedandAirborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, C. J. Evans, L. Simard, H. Takami, Eds., vol. 9908 of Society of Photo-Optical In...

  45. [53]

    Vissapragada,et al., A High-resolution Non-detection of Escaping Helium in the Ultrahot Neptune LTT 9779b: Evidence for Weakened Evaporation.Astrophys

    S. Vissapragada,et al., A High-resolution Non-detection of Escaping Helium in the Ultrahot Neptune LTT 9779b: Evidence for Weakened Evaporation.Astrophys. J. Lett.962(1), L19 (2024), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad23cf

  46. [54]

    R.V.Kochanov,etal.,HITRANApplicationProgrammingInterface(HAPI):Acomprehen- sive approach to working with spectroscopic data.J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer177, 15–30 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.03.005

  47. [55]

    I.E.Gordon,etal.,TheHITRAN2020molecularspectroscopicdatabase.J.Quant.Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer277, 107949 (2022), doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

  48. [56]

    E. Oliva,et al., Lines and continuum sky emission in the near infrared: observational con- straintsfromdeephighspectralresolutionspectrawithGIANO-TNG.Astron.Astrophys.581, A47 (2015), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526291

  49. [57]

    Astrophys.558, A33 (2013), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    Astropy Collaboration,et al., Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy.Astron. Astrophys.558, A33 (2013), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

  50. [58]

    J.156(3), 123 (2018), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ aabc4f

    Astropy Collaboration,et al., The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package.Astron. J.156(3), 123 (2018), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ aabc4f

  51. [59]

    Astrophys

    Astropy Collaboration,et al., The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community- oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. Astrophys. J.935(2), 167 (2022), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

  52. [60]

    A. C. Carnall, SpectRes: A Fast Spectral Resampling Tool in Python.arXiv e-prints(2017), doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.05165

  53. [61]

    D.Foreman-Mackey,D.W.Hogg,D.Lang,J.Goodman,emcee:TheMCMCHammer.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125(925), 306 (2013), doi:10.1086/670067

  54. [62]

    D.Foreman-Mackey,E.Agol,S.Ambikasaran,R.Angus,FastandScalableGaussianProcess ModelingwithApplicationstoAstronomicalTimeSeries.Astron.J.154(6),220(2017),doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa9332. 19

  55. [63]

    Astrophys

    P.McCreery,L.A.DosSantos,N.Espinoza,R.Allart,J.Kirk,TracingtheWinds:AUniform Interpretation of Helium Escape in Exoplanets from Archival Spectroscopic Observations. Astrophys. J.980(1), 125 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ada6b9

  56. [64]

    J.165(2), 62 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca75b

    M.Zhang,etal.,DetectionofAtmosphericEscapefromFourYoungMini-Neptunes.Astron. J.165(2), 62 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca75b

  57. [65]

    K.Horne,AnoptimalextractionalgorithmforCCDspectroscopy.Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac.98, 609–617 (1986), doi:10.1086/131801

  58. [66]

    Husser,et al., A new extensive library of PHOENIX stellar atmospheres and synthetic spectra.Astron

    T.-O. Husser,et al., A new extensive library of PHOENIX stellar atmospheres and synthetic spectra.Astron. Astrophys.553, A6 (2013), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

  59. [67]

    S.D.Lord,AnewsoftwaretoolforcomputingEarth’satmospherictransmissionofnear-and far-infrared radiation, NASA Technical Memorandum 103957 (1992)

  60. [69]

    Oklopčić, C

    A. Oklopčić, C. M. Hirata, A New Window into Escaping Exoplanet Atmospheres: 10830 Å Line of Helium.Astrophys. J. Lett.855(1), L11 (2018), doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaada9

  61. [70]

    Lampón,et al., Modelling the He I triplet absorption at 10 830 Å in the atmosphere of HD 209458 b.Astron

    M. Lampón,et al., Modelling the He I triplet absorption at 10 830 Å in the atmosphere of HD 209458 b.Astron. Astrophys.636, A13 (2020), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937175

  62. [72]

    Zhang,et al., Constraining Atmospheric Composition from the Outflow: Helium Obser- vationsRevealtheFundamentalPropertiesofTwoPlanetsStraddlingtheRadiusGap.Astron

    M. Zhang,et al., Constraining Atmospheric Composition from the Outflow: Helium Obser- vationsRevealtheFundamentalPropertiesofTwoPlanetsStraddlingtheRadiusGap.Astron. J.169(4), 204 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adb490. 20

  63. [73]

    J.926(2), 226 (2022), doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac46ce

    M.MacLeod,A.Oklopčić,StellarWindConfinementofEvaporatingExoplanetAtmospheres and Its Signatures in 1083 nm Observations.Astrophys. J.926(2), 226 (2022), doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ac46ce

  64. [74]

    Jansen,et al., XMM-Newton observatory

    F. Jansen,et al., XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations.Astron. Astro- phys.365, L1–L6 (2001), doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

  65. [75]

    Strüder,et al., The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera.Astron

    L. Strüder,et al., The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera.Astron. Astrophys.365, L18–L26 (2001), doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000066

  66. [76]

    M. J. L. Turner,et al., The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS cameras.Astron. Astrophys.365, L27–L35 (2001), doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000087

  67. [77]

    C. Gabriel,et al., The XMM-Newton SAS - Distributed Development and Maintenance of a Large Science Analysis System: A Critical Analysis, inAstronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, F. Ochsenbein, M. G. Allen, D. Egret, Eds., vol. 314 of Astronomical Society...

  68. [78]

    GaiaCollaboration,etal.,GaiaDataRelease3.Summaryofthecontentandsurveyproperties. Astron. Astrophys.674, A1 (2023), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

  69. [79]

    Buchner,et al., X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue.Astron

    J. Buchner,et al., X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue.Astron. Astrophys.564, A125 (2014), doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201322971

  70. [80]

    Buchner, UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine.J

    J. Buchner, UltraNest - a robust, general purpose Bayesian inference engine.J. Open Source Softw.6(60), 3001 (2021), doi:10.21105/joss.03001

  71. [81]

    K. A. Arnaud, XSPEC: The First Ten Years, inAstronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, G. H. Jacoby, J. Barnes, Eds., vol. 101 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series(1996), p. 17

  72. [82]

    J.S.Kaastra,J.A.M.Bleeker,OptimalbinningofX-rayspectraandresponsematrixdesign. Astron. Astrophys.587, A151 (2016), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527395. 21

  73. [83]

    Cash, Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio

    W. Cash, Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J.228, 939–947 (1979), doi:10.1086/156922

  74. [84]

    Asplund, N

    M. Asplund, N. Grevesse, A. J. Sauval, P. Scott, The Chemical Composition of the Sun. Annu.Rev.Astron.Astrophys.47(1),481–522(2009),doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407. 145222

  75. [85]

    R.K.Smith,N.S.Brickhouse,D.A.Liedahl,J.C.Raymond,CollisionalPlasmaModelswith APEC/APED:Emission-LineDiagnosticsofHydrogen-likeandHelium-likeIons.Astrophys. J. Lett.556(2), L91–L95 (2001), doi:10.1086/322992

  76. [86]

    Redfield, J

    S. Redfield, J. L. Linsky, The Three-dimensional Structure of the Warm Local Interstellar Medium. II. The Colorado Model of the Local Interstellar Cloud.Astrophys. J.534(2), 825–837 (2000), doi:10.1086/308769

  77. [87]

    R.Spinelli,etal.,PlanetaryParameters,XUVEnvironments,andMass-lossRatesforNearby GaseousPlanetswithX-Ray-detectedHostStars.Astron.J.165(5),200(2023),doi:10.3847/ 1538-3881/acc336

  78. [88]

    Spinelli,et al., The high-energy radiation environment of the habitable-zone super-Earth LHS 1140b.Astron

    R. Spinelli,et al., The high-energy radiation environment of the habitable-zone super-Earth LHS 1140b.Astron. Astrophys.627, A144 (2019), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935636

  79. [89]

    N. J. Wright, E. R. Newton, P. K. G. Williams, J. J. Drake, R. K. Yadav, The stellar rotation- activity relationship in fully convective M dwarfs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.479(2), 2351– 2360 (2018), doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1670

  80. [90]

    P. G. Judge, S. C. Solomon, T. R. Ayres, An Estimate of the Sun’s ROSAT-PSPC X-Ray Luminosities Using SNOE-SXP Measurements.Astrophys. J.593(1), 534–548 (2003), doi: 10.1086/376405

  81. [91]

    Bonfils,et al., Radial velocity follow-up of GJ1132 with HARPS

    X. Bonfils,et al., Radial velocity follow-up of GJ1132 with HARPS. A precise mass for planet b and the discovery of a second planet.Astron. Astrophys.618, A142 (2018), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731884. 22

  82. [92]

    Toledo-Padrón,et al., Stellar activity analysis of Barnard’s Star: very slow rotation and evidence for long-term activity cycle.Mon

    B. Toledo-Padrón,et al., Stellar activity analysis of Barnard’s Star: very slow rotation and evidence for long-term activity cycle.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.488(4), 5145–5161 (2019), doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1975

  83. [93]

    D. J. Wilson,et al., The Mega-MUSCLES Treasury Survey: X-Ray to Infrared Spectral Energy Distributions of a Representative Sample of M Dwarfs.Astrophys. J.978(1), 85 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9251

  84. [94]

    D. J. Wilson,et al., The Mega-MUSCLES Spectral Energy Distribution of TRAPPIST-1. Astrophys. J.911(1), 18 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe771

  85. [95]

    Brown,et al., Coronal X-Ray Emission from Nearby, Low-mass, Exoplanet Host Stars ObservedbytheMUSCLESandMega-MUSCLESHSTTreasurySurveyProjects.Astron.J

    A. Brown,et al., Coronal X-Ray Emission from Nearby, Low-mass, Exoplanet Host Stars ObservedbytheMUSCLESandMega-MUSCLESHSTTreasurySurveyProjects.Astron.J. 165(5), 195 (2023), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acc38a

  86. [96]

    J.168(4), 177 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6d60

    R.Cilley,G.W.King,L.Corrales,DetectingExoplanetTransitswiththeNextGenerationof X-Ray Telescopes.Astron. J.168(4), 177 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6d60

  87. [98]

    Andretta, P

    V. Andretta, P. J. D. Mauas, A. Falchi, L. Teriaca, Helium Line Formation and Abundance during a C-Class Flare.Astrophys. J.681(1), 650–663 (2008), doi:10.1086/587933

  88. [99]

    P. G. Judge, L. Kleint, A. Sainz Dalda, On Helium 1083 nm Line Polarization during the Impulsive Phase of an X1 Flare.Astrophys. J.814(2), 100 (2015), doi:10.1088/0004-637X/ 814/2/100

  89. [100]

    Fuhrmeister,et al., The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs

    B. Fuhrmeister,et al., The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. The He I triplet at 10830 Å across the M dwarf sequence.Astron. Astrophys.632, A24 (2019), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936193

  90. [101]

    Vissapragada,et al., A Search for Planetary Metastable Helium Absorption in the V1298 Tau System.Astron

    S. Vissapragada,et al., A Search for Planetary Metastable Helium Absorption in the V1298 Tau System.Astron. J.162(5), 222 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac1bb0. 23

  91. [102]

    L.Wang,F.Dai,MetastableHeliumAbsorptionswith3DHydrodynamicsandSelf-consistent Photochemistry. I. WASP-69b, Dimensionality, X-Ray and UV Flux Level, Spectral Types, and Flares.Astrophys. J.914(2), 98 (2021), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf1ee

  92. [103]

    Fuhrmeister,et al., The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs

    B. Fuhrmeister,et al., The CARMENES search for exoplanets around M dwarfs. Behaviour of the Paschen lines during flares and quiescence.Astron. Astrophys.678, A1 (2023), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347161

  93. [104]

    B. V. Rackham, D. Apai, M. S. Giampapa, The Transit Light Source Effect: False Spectral Features and Incorrect Densities for M-dwarf Transiting Planets.Astrophys. J.853(2), 122 (2018), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa08c

  94. [105]

    Coulombe,et al., Possible Evidence for the Presence of Volatiles on the Warm Super- Earth TOI-270 b.Astron

    L.-P. Coulombe,et al., Possible Evidence for the Presence of Volatiles on the Warm Super- Earth TOI-270 b.Astron. J.170(4), 226 (2025), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adfc6a

  95. [106]

    Astrophys.543, L4 (2012), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219363

    A.LecavelierdesEtangs,etal.,Temporalvariationsintheevaporatingatmosphereoftheexo- planet HD 189733b.Astron. Astrophys.543, L4 (2012), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219363

  96. [107]

    B. J. Wargelin,et al., X-Ray, UV, and Optical Observations of Proxima Centauri’s Stellar Cycle.Astrophys. J.977(2), 144 (2024), doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8faa

  97. [108]

    J.164(6), 237 (2022), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9675

    M.Zhang,etal.,MoreEvidenceforVariableHeliumAbsorptionfromHD189733b.Astron. J.164(6), 237 (2022), doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9675

  98. [109]

    Allart,et al., Spectrally resolved helium absorption from the extended atmosphere of a warmNeptune-massexoplanet.Science362(6421),1384–1387(2018),doi:10.1126/science

    R. Allart,et al., Spectrally resolved helium absorption from the extended atmosphere of a warmNeptune-massexoplanet.Science362(6421),1384–1387(2018),doi:10.1126/science. aat5879

  99. [110]

    A. R. Taylor,et al., A Multispecies Atmospheric Escape Model with Excited Hydrogen and Helium: Application to HD209458b.Astrophys. J.989(1), 68 (2025), doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/ade3c9

  100. [111]

    Suárez Mascareño, R

    A. Suárez Mascareño, R. Rebolo, J. I. González Hernández, Magnetic cycles and rotation periods of late-type stars from photometric time series.Astron. Astrophys.595, A12 (2016), doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628586. 24

  101. [112]

    Díez Alonso,et al., CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs

    E. Díez Alonso,et al., CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs. IV. New rotation periods fromphotometrictimeseries.Astron.Astrophys.621,A126(2019),doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 201833316

  102. [113]

    Astrophys.675, A168 (2023), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244249

    L.Mignon,etal.,CharacterisationofstellaractivityofMdwarfs.I.Long-timescalevariability in a large sample and detection of new cycles.Astron. Astrophys.675, A168 (2023), doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244249

  103. [114]

    combined

    I.S.Savanov,ActivitycyclesofMdwarfs.Astron.Rep.56(9),716–721(2012),doi:10.1134/ S1063772912090077. Acknowledgments We thank Evgenya Shkolnik for helpful comments on stellar helium lines. This paper is based on WINERED data gathered with the 6.5 m Clay/Magellan II Telescope loc...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.