Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 60 references

Atmospheric carbon and oxygen abundances, paired with orbital data, reveal that most hot Jupiters were born beyond the water ice line and subsequently scattered inward.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 00:00 UTC pith:Q3INMBIU

load-bearing objection Plausible but not yet robust: the two-knob fit and fiducial chemistry choices control the six-of-nine claim, though the paper is transparent about it. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15144 v1 pith:Q3INMBIU submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.EP

The majority of hot Jupiters formed beyond the water ice line

Yaxing He , Bertram Bitsch , Adrien Houge , Joe Williams , Masahiro Ogihara This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords hot Jupitersatmospheric compositionsnowlinespebble accretionplanet migrationC/H ratioO/H ratioorbital dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the atmospheric carbon and oxygen abundances of hot Jupiters record where in the protoplanetary disc each planet was born. Using planet formation simulations that track pebble drift and accretion, gas accretion, migration, and a refined disc chemistry, the authors reproduce the observed C/H and O/H ratios of all nine hot Jupiters in their sample. The matching simulations place at least six of the nine planets beyond the water ice line at birth. Reading these inferred birthplaces together with the planets' present-day orbits, eccentricities, and spin–orbit obliquities, the paper concludes that many hot Jupiters were dynamically scattered inward and then tidally circularised, rather than migrating smoothly through the disc. If correct, measurements of atmospheric abundances plus orbital architecture become a diagnostic of how hot Jupiters formed and migrated.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a planet's atmospheric C/H and O/H ratios, in the framework of a pebble-accretion planet formation model that includes thermal decomposition of refractory organics and trapping of CO/CO2 in amorphous water ice, map onto distinct formation regions bounded by the H2O and CO2 snowlines. Applying this map to nine hot Jupiters with measured carbon and oxygen abundances, the simulations reproduce every system, and six of the nine are consistent with formation beyond the H2O snowline, several even beyond the CO2 snowline. Because many of these planets end the simulation outside the inner disc boundary, the paper argues that smooth disc migration alone cannot delive

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the mapping between a planet's atmospheric C/H and O/H ratios and the snowline structure of the protoplanetary disc. The model computes how pebble drift and evaporation enrich the gas phase, with two additional processes shaping the carbon and oxygen radial profiles: refractory organics decompose into volatile carbon in the inner disc, and CO and CO2 trapped in amorphous water ice are released when the ice crystallises at 130 K, creating a 'volcano line'. Planets forming inside the H2O snowline accrete oxygen-rich gas, while those beyond the CO2 snowline receive comparatively oxygen-poor gas, so the C/H–O/H plane separates formation regions. The simulations vary only

Load-bearing premise

The whole inference rests on the assumption that the simulated C/H and O/H ratios reliably track the formation location, which depends on uncertain chemical choices—notably a 50% trapping efficiency of CO and CO2 in amorphous water ice, the treatment of refractory organic decomposition, and a fixed disc mass of 0.07 solar masses—and on observational abundance constraints with very large error bars.

What would settle it

A measurement that would settle the claim: take a hot Jupiter whose formation location is independently constrained (for example, by a directly imaged outer companion or a precise disc-mass/age estimate) and compare its observed C/H and O/H with the model's snowline-formation grid; a systematic offset would falsify the map. Alternatively, laboratory experiments showing that CO/CO2 trapping efficiencies in amorphous water ice differ substantially from the adopted 50% would shift the predicted compositions enough to change which of the nine systems are classified as forming beyond the H2O snowli

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the composition-to-location map is right, measuring a hot Jupiter's atmospheric C/H and O/H tells you whether it formed inside or outside the water ice line, even when the planet has migrated far from its birthplace.
  • The combination of atmospheric abundances with orbital eccentricity, obliquity, and separation separates smooth disc-driven migration from high-eccentricity migration with tidal damping; systems like tau Boötis b are predicted to remain misaligned, and TrES-3 b to be aligned.
  • The inferred wide range of birth locations implies that hot Jupiter formation is not confined to a narrow disc annulus; embryos in the outer disc must form early enough to accrete pebbles and gas before the disc disperses.
  • The finding that several planets formed beyond the CO2 snowline suggests that very cold, carbon-rich material can be incorporated into close-in giant planets, which could show up as elevated C/O ratios in their atmospheres.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same C/H–O/H diagnostic to warm Jupiters or sub-Neptunes could map the volatile delivery across a whole population, not just hot Jupiters, if the chemistry-to-location calibration transfers.
  • The 50% CO/CO2 trapping efficiency chosen for amorphous water ice is a load-bearing assumption; laboratory measurements of trapping efficiencies at disc-relevant temperatures could sharpen or overturn the snowline-relative classifications.
  • Multi-planet simulations with scattering followed by continued gas accretion could test whether the post-scattering gas accretion dilutes the composition signal, which in turn would constrain whether scattering happened early or late in the disc lifetime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents planet formation simulations with the ChemComp code, extended with thermal decomposition of refractory organics and CO/CO2 trapping in amorphous water ice, and applies them to nine hot Jupiters whose atmospheric C/H and O/H have been retrieved. For each system, a grid of initial embryo positions and disc viscosities is run, and simulations that match the observed C/H and O/H are used to infer the formation region relative to the H2O and CO2 snowlines. The authors conclude that at least six of the nine systems formed beyond the H2O snowline, and, combining the inferred migration pathways with current orbital eccentricities and obliquities, that many systems experienced dynamical scattering followed by tidal evolution. The paper explicitly acknowledges several limitations, including the degeneracy of C/O alone, the order-of-magnitude nature of tidal timescales, and the use of fixed disc parameters.

Significance. If the central inference is robust, the paper would be an important step toward using atmospheric abundances as a diagnostic of hot Jupiter formation locations and migration histories. Its strengths include the explicit treatment of two recently proposed chemical processes, the use of host-star abundances from the Hypatia catalogue, the application to a sample of nine observed systems, and the clear statement that C/O alone is insufficient. The paper also produces specific, testable predictions (e.g., τ Boötis b remains misaligned; TrES-3 b is aligned). However, the significance of the headline claim depends on whether the inferred formation locations are genuinely constrained by the data rather than by the adopted model choices and grid architecture, and this is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 and Table C.1(b)] The observational constraints used to select matching simulations are extremely loose for several systems. For example, WASP-19 b has C/H = 116 +2000/-110 × 10^-4 and O/H = 224 +2500/-210 × 10^-4; HAT-P-2 b and WASP-74 b have similar lower bounds near 10^-4 and upper bounds exceeding 2000 × 10^-4. With such intervals, a very large fraction of the model grid is likely to match. The paper states that the observed abundances are 'reproduced' for all nine systems, but it does not report the number or fraction of simulations per system that satisfy the C/H and O/H constraints. Without this matching-fraction analysis, the inferred formation regions shown in Fig. 1 may reflect grid coverage rather than data. I request a quantitative accounting of matching simulations and, if possible, a likelihood or goodness-of-fit measure that uses the full posteriors rather than interval membership.
  2. [Appendix A and Section 2] The discrimination between formation inside and beyond the H2O snowline is controlled by the gas-phase C/H and O/H profiles, which in turn depend on two fiducial choices that are not varied: the CO/CO2 trapping efficiency in amorphous water ice (set to 50% in Appendix A, citing Williams et al. 2025) and the fixed disc mass M_disc = 0.07 M_star (Section 2). Different trapping efficiencies change the location and strength of volatile release at the water-ice crystallization front; different disc masses change the snowline locations and the accretion timescale. The headline conclusion that at least six of nine systems formed beyond the H2O snowline can therefore shift under plausible alternative values. I request a sensitivity study over, at minimum, trapping efficiency in the range 0–100%, M_disc from ~0.03 to 0.1 M_star, and the initial carbon partitioning among refractory, CO, CO2, and C
  3. [Section 4, Fig. B.2, Table 1] The dynamical conclusions are drawn from the same migration tracks that were selected by the composition fit. Systems whose selected tracks reach the 0.2 au inner boundary are classified as requiring only disc-driven migration; systems that stop outside 0.2 au are classified as needing dynamical scattering and tidal evolution. Because the composition constraints are weak (comment 1), the set of selected tracks may be large and internally diverse; the inferred need for scattering is then not a robust prediction. The paper does not show whether the orbital classification in Table 1 is stable when all simulations that match C/H and O/H within the observed intervals are considered, nor how the result depends on the t≥1 Myr filter and the 0.2 au boundary. I request a stability analysis that reports, for each system, what fraction of matching simulations fall into each inferred orbital categor
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The name 'WASP-77A b' is written inconsistently as 'W ASP-77 A b' in the text and 'WASP-77 A b' in figures. Please standardize.
  2. [Table 1] For τ Boötis b and WASP-121 b, the realignment timescales are given in parentheses with '≳' estimates, but the table note says parentheses indicate that the primordial configuration already matches the observed one. For τ Boötis b the observed obliquity is listed as 'unknown', so this note is confusing. Clarify what the parentheses mean when the observed obliquity is unknown.
  3. [Appendix D] Equation D.2 uses Q10/k10 as the inertial-wave tidal quality factor. The text states 'Q10/k10 = 10^6–10^7'. Please verify that this range matches the normalization of Lai (2012); if the standard normalization is 10^7, this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Appendix B, Fig. B.1] The caption of Fig. B.1 lists 'C H2O CO2 CH4 CO' as the x-axis labels; the spacing suggests missing superscripts. Also, the caption is very long and would benefit from splitting into a main sentence and a separate legend explanation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: formation-location inference is a parameter fit, and the orbital-state discussion is explicitly qualitative, not a prediction derived from the fitted values.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is a standard parameter-estimation exercise: initial embryo position and disc viscosity are varied, and the subset of simulations matching observed C/H and O/H is used to bin formation locations relative to the H2O/CO2 snowlines (Section 2, Appendix B, Fig. 1). This is a fit, not a prediction. The classification 'inside/between/outside snowline' is a coordinate transformation of the fitted initial position, but the mapping from initial position to atmospheric composition is supplied by an independent formation+chemistry model (ChemComp and the adopted chemical processes), not by the observational abundances. No equation or claim reduces by construction to its inputs. The co-authored chemical inputs (Houge et al. 2025; Williams et al. 2025; Williams and Houge are co-authors) are external model components, not the target result; their fixed values affect robustness, not circularity. The Table 1 orbital states are explicitly disclaimed as 'qualitative primordial states inferred from the migration pathway, rather than numerical obliquities or eccentricities calculated by the formation model,' so they are not presented as model-derived predictions. The tidal-obliquity prediction for tau Boötis b is a testable extrapolation, not a restatement of the fitted C/H and O/H. The paper's own limitation statements (fixed disc mass, fiducial trapping efficiency, broad observational error bars) indicate model dependence and weak discriminating power, but these are correctness/sensitivity concerns, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step can be quoted and exhibited, and the score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's contribution is the application, not the machinery: the fitted initial position and viscosity carry the inference, the chemistry is inherited from same-group papers with fiducial efficiencies, and the dynamical interpretation leans on a simulation-boundary discriminator. No genuinely independent external benchmark is used to validate the inferred locations.

free parameters (7)
  • initial embryo orbital radius (a_p,init) = system-dependent; grid over ~0.1-100 au (Fig. B.1)
    The headline formation-region classification IS this fitted parameter: simulations are selected by whether their C/H and O/H match observations, and the snowline-relative location of the selected a_p,init gives the result.
  • disc viscosity alpha = sampled from {1e-4, 5e-4, 1e-3}
    Varied per system to match C/H and O/H and the growth-time criterion; controls migration speed and hence which snowline regions the planet samples before reaching final mass.
  • CO/CO2 trapping efficiency in amorphous water ice = 50% (fiducial)
    Adopted from Williams et al. (2025), a co-author on this paper. Directly sets the radial C/O, C/H, O/H profiles (Appendix A) that define the composition-location mapping; not varied and its uncertainty is not propagated.
  • initial carbon partitioning = 60% refractory, 29% CO, 10% CO2, 1% CH4
    Assumed in Appendix A; controls how much carbon is available in gas and ice at each radius, and therefore the C/H and O/H seen by planets in different regions.
  • disc mass M_disc = 0.07 M_star (all systems)
    We adopted a fixed disc mass of M_disc = 0.07 M_star (Section 2). Disc mass sets pebble flux and growth speed; fixed by hand rather than fitted, but it shapes which initial positions can grow in time.
  • fragmentation velocity v_frag = 5 m/s
    Fixed from earlier studies (Section 2, Appendix C); sets pebble sizes, which control pebble drift and accretion efficiencies.
  • tidal quality factors Qp/k2p, Q10/k10 = 1e6 and 1e6-1e7 (fiducial)
    Used in Appendix D to produce the circularisation/realignment timescales that support the dynamical narrative in Table 1; the paper itself labels these order-of-magnitude estimates.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption ChemComp's pebble growth/drift, gas accretion and migration prescriptions describe real giant-planet growth
    Inherited from Schneider & Bitsch (2021) and Bitsch et al. (2022); the whole composition-to-location mapping sits on this code.
  • domain assumption Neglecting planetesimal formation/accretion does not alter inferred locations
    Section 2, justified via Danti et al. (2023); this removes an enrichment channel and keeps the parameter count at two.
  • domain assumption Single-planet simulation captures the envelope composition of each observed hot Jupiter
    Section 2, justified via Eberlein et al. (2024); multi-planet interactions are excluded by design.
  • domain assumption Published C/H and O/H retrievals are usable as constraints
    Table C.1(b); several error bars span orders of magnitude (WASP-19 b: C/H = 116 +2000/-110 x 10^-4), so 'consistency' is weak for those systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The t >= 1 Myr growth-time filter is valid
    Section 2 and Appendix B: the cut removes matching high-viscosity runs and changes the formation-location classification ('Some high-viscosity points can match... but were not included').
  • ad hoc to paper Reaching the 0.2 au inner boundary means disc-driven migration suffices
    Appendix B/Fig. B.2: observed orbits are at 0.016-0.05 au, so all planets still need post-model evolution; the 0.2 au discriminator is a simulation edge, not a physical barrier.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12442 in / 21155 out tokens · 167466 ms · 2026-08-02T00:00:32.871411+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Atmospheric compositions of giant exoplanets can retain information about their formation environments, as volatile species condense at different temperatures in protoplanetary discs. We investigated whether the atmospheric compositions of hot Jupiters can constrain their formation locations. We performed planet formation simulations using the ChemComp code, including pebble drift, pebble and gas accretion, planet migration, stellar abundances, and two additional chemical processes: thermal decomposition of refractory organics and CO/CO2 trapping in water ice. We applied this framework to nine observed hot Jupiter systems and compared the resulting atmospheric metallicities (C/H and O/H) with observational constraints. We found that the observed atmospheric abundances of the nine hot Jupiter systems can be reproduced by planets forming at different locations relative to the H2O and CO2 snowlines. Our results suggest that at least six of the nine systems are consistent with formation beyond the H2O snowline. Combined with the observed orbital separations, eccentricities, and spin-orbit obliquities, these inferred formation locations indicate that many systems likely experienced dynamical scattering followed by tidal evolution. Atmospheric abundances, in combination with detailed orbital parameters, can provide a powerful diagnostic of the formation and migration histories of hot Jupiter systems, opening up avenues to understand the origin of giant planets in general.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15144 by Adrien Houge, Bertram Bitsch, Joe Williams, Masahiro Ogihara, Yaxing He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated versus observed atmospheric metallicities of hot Jupiters in the C/H–O/H plane. Grey crosses show retrieved values listed in Table C.1(b); coloured symbols mark matching simulations. Both colour and marker shape indicate the formation region: blue cir￾cles inside the H2O snowline, purple squares between the H2O and CO2 snowlines, and red triangles beyond the CO2 snowline. For HAT-P-2 b and WASP-7… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Disk Frequencies and Lifetimes in Young Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/320685 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104347 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Protoplanetary Disks and Their Evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102548 , archivePrefix =. 1103.0556 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    stellar mass and possible implications for giant planet populations

    Protoplanetary disk lifetimes vs. stellar mass and possible implications for giant planet populations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424846 , archivePrefix =. 1502.00631 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Planetesimal rings as the cause of the Solar System's planetary architecture. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01557-z , archivePrefix =. 2112.15558 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , year = 1995, month = nov, volume =

    A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. , year = 1995, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1038/378355a0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1038/378355a0 1995

  6. [6]

    , year = 1996, month = apr, volume =

    Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location. , year = 1996, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1038/380606a0 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1038/380606a0 1996

  7. [7]

    Toward a Deterministic Model of Planetary Formation. V. Accumulation Near the Ice Line and Super-Earths. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590401 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/590401

  8. [8]

    Extrasolar planet population synthesis. I. Method, formation tracks, and mass-distance distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810301 , archivePrefix =. 0904.2524 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    The growth of planets by pebble accretion in evolving protoplanetary discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526463 , archivePrefix =. 1507.05209 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Science , keywords =

    Dynamical instabilities and the formation of extrasolar planetary systems. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1126/science.274.5289.954

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Shrinking Binary and Planetary Orbits by Kozai Cycles with Tidal Friction. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/521702 , archivePrefix =. 0705.4285 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Multiple-planet Scattering and the Origin of Hot Jupiters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/119 , archivePrefix =. 1110.4392 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Origins of Hot Jupiters. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051853 , archivePrefix =. 1801.06117 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    The Effects of Snowlines on C/O in Planetary Atmospheres. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/743/1/L16 , archivePrefix =. 1110.5567 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Molecular abundances and C/O ratios in chemically evolving planet-forming disk midplanes. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731302 , archivePrefix =. 1709.07863 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Interpreting the Atmospheric Composition of Exoplanets: Sensitivity to Planet Formation Assumptions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6a56 , archivePrefix =. 2204.13714 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Atmospheric signatures of giant exoplanet formation by pebble accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1139 , archivePrefix =. 1611.03083 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Coupled Dust and chemical evolution in protoplanetary discs

    Composition of early planetary atmospheres - II. Coupled Dust and chemical evolution in protoplanetary discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1069 , archivePrefix =. 1705.02381 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    How drifting and evaporating pebbles shape giant planets. I. Heavy element content and atmospheric C/O. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039640 , archivePrefix =. 2105.13267 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Tracing the Formation History of Giant Planets in Protoplanetary Disks with Carbon, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and Sulfur. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd6e5 , archivePrefix =. 2012.14315 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  21. [21]

    How drifting and evaporating pebbles shape giant planets. III. The formation of WASP-77A b and Bo \"o tis b. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243345 , archivePrefix =. 2207.06077 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Protostars and Planets VI , year = 2014, editor =

    Volatiles in Protoplanetary Disks. Protostars and Planets VI , year = 2014, editor =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch016 , archivePrefix =. 1401.2423 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    C/O and Snowline Locations in Protoplanetary Disks: The Effect of Radial Drift and Viscous Gas Accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/109 , archivePrefix =. 1511.05563 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Chemical enrichment of giant planets and discs due to pebble drift. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1103 , archivePrefix =. 1705.03305 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    How to make giant planets via pebble accretion. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245793 , archivePrefix =. 2309.03807 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Composition of giant planets: The roles of pebbles and planetesimals. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347501 , archivePrefix =. 2310.02886 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    BOWIE-ALIGN: how formation and migration histories of giant planets impact atmospheric compositions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2362 , archivePrefix =. 2407.03199 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Heavy-element-enriched atmospheres and where they are born. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556898 , archivePrefix =. 2512.07944 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Stellar Abundances in the Solar Neighborhood: The Hypatia Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/3/54 , archivePrefix =. 1405.6719 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Burned to ashes: How the thermal decomposition of refractory organics in the inner protoplanetary disc impacts the gas-phase C/O ratio. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555164 , archivePrefix =. 2505.20427 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Locked in ice: how pebble drift and volatile entrapment can significantly impact carbon and oxygen ratios in evolving protoplanetary discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1839 , archivePrefix =. 2510.18587 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Re-analysis of ten hot-Jupiter atmospheres with disequilibrium chemistry retrieval. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453518 , archivePrefix =. 2506.12806 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    A simple model for the evolution of the dust population in protoplanetary disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118136 , archivePrefix =. 1201.5781 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Probing the impact of varied migration and gas accretion rates for the formation of giant planets in the pebble accretion scenario. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3629 , archivePrefix =. 2011.09146 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Protostars and Planets VI , year = 2014, editor =

    The Multifaceted Planetesimal Formation Process. Protostars and Planets VI , year = 2014, editor =. doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch024 , archivePrefix =. 1402.1344 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    Effects of diffusion

    A torque formula for non-isothermal Type I planetary migration - II. Effects of diffusion. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17442.x , archivePrefix =. 1007.4964 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    A solar C/O and sub-solar metallicity in a hot Jupiter atmosphere. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03912-6 , archivePrefix =. 2110.14821 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    SiO and a super-stellar C/O ratio in the atmosphere of the giant exoplanet WASP-121 b. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02513-x , archivePrefix =. 2506.01771 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Atmospheres, Atmospheres! Do I Look Like I Care About Atmospheres? , year = 2021, month = oct, eid =

    Where is the Water? Jupiter-like C/H ratio but strong H2O depletion found on tau Boo b using SPIRou. Atmospheres, Atmospheres! Do I Look Like I Care About Atmospheres? , year = 2021, month = oct, eid =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5548123 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.5548123 2021

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    How initial disc conditions sculpt the atmospheric composition of giant planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556632 , archivePrefix =. 2601.10285 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Disc and atmosphere composition of multi-planet systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449840 , archivePrefix =. 2407.20117 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Exoplanets and Disks: Their Formation and Diversity , year = 2009, editor =

    Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Lifetimes of Primordial Disks. Exoplanets and Disks: Their Formation and Diversity , year = 2009, editor =. doi:10.1063/1.3215910 , archivePrefix =. 0906.5011 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Most Planets Might Have More than 5 Myr of Time to Form. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9839 , archivePrefix =. 2210.02420 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Early dynamical instabilities in the giant planet systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt431 , archivePrefix =. 1303.6062 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Giants are bullies: How their growth influences systems of inner sub-Neptunes and super-Earths. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245040 , archivePrefix =. 2304.12758 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , year = 2012, month = nov, volume =

    A primordial origin for misalignments between stellar spin axes and planetary orbits. , year = 2012, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1038/nature11560 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1038/nature11560 2012

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Tidal Evolution of Close-in Extrasolar Planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/529187 , archivePrefix =. 0802.1543 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Tidal dissipation in planet-hosting stars: damping of spin-orbit misalignment and survival of hot Jupiters. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20893.x , archivePrefix =. 1109.4703 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Hot Stars with Hot Jupiters Have High Obliquities. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/L145 , archivePrefix =. 1006.4161 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Orbital eccentricity growth through disc-companion tidal interaction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000011 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000011

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Disk eccentricity and embedded planets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053914 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0510393 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Highly inclined and eccentric massive planets. I. Planet-disc interactions. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220310 , archivePrefix =. 1305.7330 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical Origin of Extrasolar Planet Eccentricity Distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590047 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703160 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [55]

    , keywords =

    Jupiter Analogs Orbit Stars with an Average Metallicity Close to That of the Sun. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaafca , archivePrefix =. 1802.06794 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [56]

    , keywords =

    Transport of CO in Protoplanetary Disks: Consequences of Pebble Formation, Settling, and Radial Drift. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad69b , archivePrefix =. 1808.01840 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    JWST Ice Band Profiles Reveal Mixed Ice Compositions in the HH 48 NE Disk. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad79fc , archivePrefix =. 2409.08117 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [58]

    , keywords =

    Identifying Close-in Jupiters that Arrived via Disk Migration: Evidence of Primordial Alignment, Preference of Nearby Companions and Hint of Runaway Migration. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0a11 , archivePrefix =. 2509.16322 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  58. [59]

    , keywords =

    Close-in ice lines and the super-stellar C/O ratio in discs around very low-mass stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347169 , archivePrefix =. 2308.15128 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    , keywords =

    Hydrodynamic outcomes of planet scattering in transitional discs. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19699.x , archivePrefix =. 1108.5382 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2011

  60. [61]

    , keywords =

    Giant Planets Orbiting Metal-rich Stars Show Signatures of Planet-Planet Interactions. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/767/2/L24 , archivePrefix =. 1302.6244 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041