Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search

As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 22 of 22 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2607.15253.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.15253 v1

Coverage vector

measured 22 of 22 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z

measured 23 of 23 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-14T04:27:10.055590Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-14T06:16:15.895014Z

Reference resolution

22 of 22 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved22
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation a1db3ddb-006e-4484-be1f-4d16bdfb0d95 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:44.923040Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 47551fcd-4165-49e1-bcc8-d6e87a039741 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.014880Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 92fbd107-ba72-4815-a18b-e5adfcd81b9a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.080798Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 11328a40-07f8-4e02-b0f8-9b0ccf811d11 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.174008Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 82d00797-564c-4d23-9e1c-fad94a52e768 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.258490Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 86787ebe-b332-4958-8932-2830ea14bf6d · outbound

This paper cites Passage Re-ranking with BERT.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Passage Re-ranking with BERT

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.340908Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 6f82f529-19e7-4026-9f63-e9fe6985bb55 · outbound

This paper cites 2009.Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference(2nd ed.).

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search 2009.Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference(2nd ed.)

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.424972Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 47b66216-4188-479f-a11a-e1818f05b40d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.514480Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c789d4af-ee06-4629-b857-7ad257d79f0a · outbound

This paper cites Smith, and Mike Lewis.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Smith, and Mike Lewis

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.678489Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 4d02475b-e407-4860-8e0a-e0f1cab958fb · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.844441Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 11a315cf-7628-4205-832b-13031208a73e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:45.957196Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c709afc5-d23d-4536-a263-2c698e556175 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2.5 Technical Report.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Qwen2.5 Technical Report

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.167355Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1ecfb542-35cd-4a3c-8ead-3936b211cfbe · outbound

This paper cites Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.282151Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation deb9bbab-8e3f-4f11-8276-58f857471452 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.428985Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 06d802cb-951f-4a38-90c6-839b37b02e5e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.633487Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d91affcf-5d15-4a52-9833-c14cfd1b1b1f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.734336Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 32c75703-2982-4893-9118-8aa0c6901165 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 18

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.892264Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f06222f3-9daa-4909-a16b-df964fc6c96b · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:47.103067Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 112534cc-37f0-41e1-bfe3-5927eb8377c7 · outbound

This paper cites If none: <citations>NONE</citations>.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search If none: <citations>NONE</citations>

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:47.257121Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 02acdbc0-2b10-4a3e-a3b5-d3f29d44ba84 · outbound

This paper cites If you reach 4, answer with your best guess.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search If you reach 4, answer with your best guess

Reference 21

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:47.412865Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation dc31a1e4-584b-4323-9ee4-1e3d9b348588 · outbound

This paper cites A.2 Static reader prompt The reader used to compute SRUwith in Section 2.6.1 is constrained to the supplied document and to a bare answer span.

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search A.2 Static reader prompt The reader used to compute SRUwith in Section 2.6.1 is constrained to the supplied document and to a bare answer span

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 33717c92-2fb4-4bcf-bd74-4df08476a5f2 · outbound

This paper cites InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL).

Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)

Reference 2023

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T23:47:46.069751Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

Observation 082dd4fe-7964-4562-a26d-22bbc4a41234 · inbound

What Would Fix This RAG Failure? Auditing Counterfactual Response with Paired Evidence Interventions cites this paper.

What Would Fix This RAG Failure? Auditing Counterfactual Response with Paired Evidence Interventions Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search

Reference 14

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-14T04:27:10.451344Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.