Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 93 references

First-Order Topological FFLO Transition and Superconducting Diode Sign Reversal in Altermagnetic Nanowires

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An altermagnet with zero net magnetization can drive a first-order transition into a topological FFLO superconductor in a nanowire, with the pairing amplitude and momentum jumping and the diode efficiency reversing sign.

desk verdict Plausible and internally consistent mean-field study of a genuinely new altermagnetic route to a first-order topological FFLO transition, but the central discontinuity may be an artifact of the single-q ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15720 v1 pith:MLTMISFH submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.supr-con

Bo Fu , Kaizhi Bai , Chang-An Li , Shun-Qing Shen This is my paper
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.20.-z74.25.Sv74.45.+c
keywords altermagnetismFFLOsuperconductivitytopologicalsuperconductingdiodeeffectfirst-orderphasetransitionMajoranazeromodesnanowireproximityGinzburg-Landautheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Altermagnets are collinear magnets with zero net magnetization whose spin splitting depends on momentum, so they can shape superconductivity without the orbital depairing that an external field brings. This paper claims that a spin-orbit-coupled nanowire proximitized to a d-wave altermagnet can host two competing finite-momentum (FFLO) pairing states, and that tuning the altermagnetic exchange strength drives a first-order transition between them. Self-consistent mean-field calculations show the free energy has two valleys; when the altermagnetic exchange crosses a critical value, the global minimum switches discontinuously from a conventional FFLO state to a topological one (Z2 = -1), so Cooper-pair amplitude and center-of-mass momentum jump together and Majorana zero modes appear. The same jump makes the superconducting diode effect strongly nonreciprocal and reverses its sign, which the authors propose as a direct transport fingerprint. The result matters because it offers a field-free, gate-tunable route to topological superconductivity whose existence could be read out simply by measuring critical currents.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-valley condensation-energy landscape Ω(Δ,q)=F(Δ,q)−F(0,q), obtained by self-consistently minimizing the mean-field Bogoliubov–de Gennes free energy over a single-plane-wave FFLO order parameter with amplitude Δ and center-of-mass momentum q. The altermagnetic term JA cos k σz is what creates two competing pairing valleys: it tilts the bands asymmetrically and reshapes spin textures so that different Fermi points impose different preferred q. The first-order switch is a level crossing between these two minima. Topology is carried by the Pfaffian Z2 invariant sgn[Pf H′(0)]·sgn[Pf H′(π)] in symmetry class D, which changes sign as the global minimum moves be

What would settle it

At low temperature, sweep the altermagnetic exchange (or the gate-controlled chemical potential) through the predicted transition and record the diode efficiency η. The paper predicts a discontinuous jump and sign reversal with hysteresis on cycling; observing a smooth, reversible η with no jump would falsify the first-order claim. Equivalently, repeat the self-consistent BdG minimization allowing two coupled pairing momenta (q1, q2): if the cFFLO and tFFLO valleys hybridize into a single minimum, the first-order topological transition disappears.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that altermagnetic proximity, despite zero net magnetization, can replace a Zeeman field as the driver of topological FFLO superconductivity, and that the transition into the topological state is first order. The momentum-dependent exchange term JA cos k σz tilts the spin-split bands and changes their spin textures, so different bands prefer different Cooper-pair momenta. The condensation energy Ω(Δ,q) then has a double-valley structure, with one minimum for the conventional FFLO state (Z2=+1) and one for the topological FFLO state (Z2=-1). At JA ≈ 0.596t the two minima cross in depth, and the global minimum jumps from one valley to the other; because the valleys

Load-bearing premise

The double-valley free energy and the discontinuous switch depend on the mean-field approximation and on allowing only one pairing momentum q; if multi-q textures or genuine one-dimensional fluctuations are included, the level crossing can be replaced by a smooth crossover.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Altermagnetic proximity can stabilize topological FFLO superconductivity and Majorana zero modes with no applied magnetic field, sidestepping orbital depairing.
  • The diode efficiency η provides a transport fingerprint: a sharp sign reversal plus enhancement marks the first-order cFFLO–tFFLO transition, while a smooth η variation marks the thermal crossover at higher temperature.
  • The same double-valley mechanism can be driven by the chemical potential, so a gate voltage offers a second, complementary control knob.
  • Near the low-temperature first-order boundary the system is effectively bistable, so sweeping the altermagnetic exchange should produce hysteresis in the supercurrent.
  • The cFFLO–tFFLO transition remains first order at low temperature but softens into a continuous boundary as temperature rises, changing the signature from a jump to a smooth evolution of η.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: In a strictly one-dimensional wire with short-range interactions, true finite-temperature phase transitions are forbidden by fluctuations. The sharp first-order line in the (JA,T) plane is a mean-field result; realizing it experimentally would require the wire to be effectively quasi-1D through coupling to the substrate, which the model does not explicitly simulate.
  • Inference: The variational restriction to a single plane-wave pairing momentum (one q) is what keeps the two valleys separate. A multi-q pair-density-wave order parameter could hybridize the valleys and convert the first-order jump into a continuous crossover; a calculation allowing coupled q1 and q2 components would test this.
  • Inference: The level-crossing mechanism implies memory. Sweeping JA across Jc up and down should show bistability in the diode efficiency, potentially usable as a supercurrent switch or a one-shot detector of the topological transition—an application the paper notes as hysteresis but does not develop.
  • Inference: If the sign of η tracks the Z2 invariant, then measuring the nonreciprocal critical currents in a gate-sweep could serve as an electrical readout of whether the wire is in the Majorana-carrying topological sector, without needing a separate tunneling experiment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a 1D spin-orbit-coupled nanowire with attractive Hubbard interactions, proximitized to a d-wave altermagnet. Using self-consistent BdG mean-field theory with a single-momentum FFLO ansatz, the authors find three FFLO phases: a gapped conventional FFLO (cFFLO, Z2=+1), a nodal FFLO (nFFLO), and a gapped topological FFLO (tFFLO, Z2=-1). The central claim is that the cFFLO–tFFLO transition is first order: the optimal pairing amplitude Δ and center-of-mass momentum q jump discontinuously at J_c ≈ 0.596t (Fig. 2c), the topological invariant changes via a level crossing between two gapped minima without a stable band-touching point (Fig. 2d), and the superconducting diode efficiency η is strongly enhanced and reverses sign sharply across the boundary (Fig. 3f). A Ginzburg-Landau two-branch free energy is fitted to the numerical landscapes to interpret the double-valley mechanism, and a finite-temperature phase diagram is presented in Fig. 4.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result is significant: it proposes a zero-net-magnetization, field-free control of topological FFLO superconductivity, with Majorana zero modes and a sharp diode-sign-reversal transport fingerprint. The model is concrete, the BdG and Pfaffian machinery is standard, and the self-consistent minimization over (Δ,q) is clearly documented in the main text and SM. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction (sign reversal of η at the cFFLO–tFFLO boundary). However, because the entire two-valley landscape and the first-order switch are obtained within a restricted single-plane-wave pairing ansatz, the central claim is not yet established beyond that ansatz. The finite-temperature robustness claim is additionally subject to the usual 1D mean-field caveat. The significance is therefore conditional: if the multi-q competitor is shown not to interpose, this would be a solid and timely contribution; as it stands, the load-bearing discontinuity may be a variational artifact.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM S2 (Eqs. S7–S10); main text Eqs. (3)–(4)] The free energy Ω(Δ,q) is minimized over a single plane-wave pairing profile Δ e^{-iqn}. The Hubbard interaction is local, so the full mean-field decoupling admits arbitrary pairing textures Δ_n = Σ_q Δ_q e^{-iqn}, i.e., multi-q pair-density waves. The two minima in Figs. 3(a,b) and the level crossing in Fig. 3(e) are properties of this restricted single-q variational manifold. Near J_c ≈ 0.596t the two single-q minima are nearly degenerate; a superposition of the cFFLO and tFFLO condensates (or an intermediate multi-q PDW) is an allowed competitor that could lower Ω and provide a continuous path between the two valleys, converting the claimed first-order jump into a second-order or continuously evolving transition and broadening or destroying the sharp diode sign reversal. The manuscript does not test this possibility, and the GL analysis in SM S5 inherits the same restriction. Because
  2. [Fig. 4 and Sec. “Robustness at finite temperature”] The finite-temperature phase diagram in the (J_A,T) plane reports first- and second-order boundaries between cFFLO and tFFLO. In a strictly 1D system with short-range interactions, finite-temperature symmetry breaking and true phase transitions are forbidden by the Mermin-Wagner-Hohenberg theorem. The mean-field finite-T free energy underlying Fig. 4 therefore cannot by itself establish a finite-T first-order line or a sharp η jump; these may be mean-field artifacts. If the proximity to the 2D altermagnet substrate makes the nanowire quasi-1D, that assumption should be stated and, ideally, modeled. In addition, the finite-T formalism (how Ω is extended to T>0 and how the phase boundaries are located) is only referenced to SM S6, not presented in enough detail in the main text. This issue does not invalidate the zero-T BdG calculation, but it directly affects the claimed robustness of the
minor comments (4)
  1. [SM S5; main text after Eq. (8)] The Ginzburg-Landau coefficients f_i^{±} are fitted to the numerical Ω(q) data, so Eqs. (S6) and (8) re-express the numerics rather than provide an independent derivation. The statement that the GL description “captures the numerically observed first-order transition quantitatively” should be softened to reflect its role as a compact parametrization of the numerics.
  2. [SM S3, Eq. (S10)] The chemical-potential window for the topological phase appears incomplete. For the two Pfaffians at k=0 and k=π to have opposite signs, μ should lie in one of two intervals centered at ±t cos(q/2), not in a single interval as written. Since the Z2 invariant is computed from the Pfaffian signs directly, this does not affect the numerical results, but the analytic condition should be corrected or clarified.
  3. [References] References [59] and [67] are the same work (G. Sim and J. Knolle, Phys. Rev. B 112, L020502 (2025)); one of the citations should be removed or replaced with a distinct work.
  4. [Typos] There are several typographical errors: “first-oder” in the section heading “First-order topological FFLO transition”; “with with α_y = α_z = 0.6t” in the Fig. 2 caption; “and and to the detailed shape” in the diode-effect section; and “an complementary knob” in the phase-transition paragraph. These should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Ginzburg–Landau 'mechanism' is a fit to the same numerical free energy; central first-order and diode claims rest on the single-q mean-field minimization rather than on an independent GL derivation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Ginzburg–Landau theory description', Eqs. (7)–(8); SM Sec. S5, Eq. (S6)]
    "These branches are well approximated by simple quadratics Ω± = f±0 + f±1 q + f±2 q², as demonstrated in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d). ... The corresponding diode efficiency associated with each branch is η± = ± f±1/f±2 + (q c + q±) / (q c − q±). (SM: 'with coefficients f±i obtained by fitting to the numerical free-energy data.')"

    The GL analysis is not an independent derivation of the first-order transition or the diode sign reversal. Its two branches Ω±(q) are built from the phenomenological form Ω = α Δ² + β Δ⁴ + γ Δ⁶ with β<0 chosen because the numerics already show a first-order transition, and the quadratic coefficients f±i are explicitly 'obtained by fitting to the numerical free-energy data' — the same Ω(q) that produced Figs. 2(c), 3(c-f) and the numerical η. Eq. (8) then algebraically rewrites those fitted slopes/curvatures into η±, so the 'analytic mechanism' restates the numerical free-energy input rather than predicting it from a separate principle. The central claims therefore stand or fall with the single-q mean-field minimization, not with the GL explanation.

full rationale

The paper's central results are obtained by a self-consistent BdG mean-field calculation: minimizing Ω(Δ,q) over (Δ,q) gives the two valleys, the first-order level crossing, and the diode efficiency via J(q)=2∂Ω/∂q. This is a legitimate, self-contained numerical computation, not a fit masquerading as a prediction. The Ginzburg–Landau section, however, is explicitly fitted to those same numerics (SM S5: 'f±i obtained by fitting to the numerical free-energy data'), so its 'analytic mechanism' is a repackaging rather than an independent check. That is a real but limited circularity: it does not generate the central claims, it only re-expresses them. The more serious limitation — that the variational space excludes multi-q pair-density-wave textures — is an approximation/correctness concern, not a circularity, and per the review rules is not scored here. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem was found; self-citations such as Ref. [73] are contextual. Score 3 reflects the partly circular GL explanatory layer while recognizing the independent numerical content of the main claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities; its ingredients (SOC nanowire, attractive Hubbard interaction, altermagnetic exchange, FFLO ansatz) are all standard inputs. The load-bearing choices are the single-q variational restriction, the mean-field decoupling in 1D, and the specific form of the proximity-induced altermagnetic field; the GL coefficients are fitted rather than derived.

free parameters (2)
  • Model parameter set (α_y, α_z, U, μ) = 0.6t, 0.6t, 1.5t (also 1.6t), 0.55t
    Chosen by hand as representative values in the FFLO regime (Fig. 2 caption); the phase diagram and the location of the first-order boundary (J_c ≈ 0.596t) depend on these. They are inputs defining the model, not fitted to experiment.
  • Ginzburg-Landau coefficients f±0, f±1, f±2 (equivalently α(q), β(q), γ(q)) = Not tabulated; obtained by fitting Eq. (S6) to the numerical Ω(q)
    SM S5 fits the GL branches to the BdG free-energy data; the β(q)<0 condition that produces the first-order barrier is inferred from the fit, not derived from the microscopic model.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Mean-field decoupling of the attractive Hubbard interaction in the FFLO channel is adequate in 1D
    SM S2 replaces the interaction with a BdG Hamiltonian. Exact 1D physics is a Luttinger liquid with no true superconducting condensate; this is standard in the Majorana nanowire literature but unstated and load-bearing for the first-order transition claim.
  • domain assumption The superconducting order parameter is a single-plane-wave FFLO state with one momentum q
    The free energy Ω(Δ,q) is minimized over a single (Δ,q) (SM S2, Eq. S10); multi-q / higher-harmonic PDW textures are excluded, which could hybridize the two valleys and change the transition's order.
  • domain assumption Proximity to the d-wave altermagnet induces the purely momentum-dependent exchange JA cos k σz in the strictly 1D nanowire
    Eq. (1); supported by citations to proximity-effect work [38,49] but not derived for the specific InAs/InSb + Rb1−δV2Te2O interface proposed in the discussion.
  • standard math Class D Z2 invariant (Pfaffian criterion) applies at the self-consistent (Δ,q)
    Eq. (5) and SM S3; requires a fully gapped spectrum, which fails in the nFFLO phase where the invariant is discussed alongside nodal states.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-Order Topological FFLO Transition and Superconducting Diode Sign Reversal in Altermagnetic Nanowires." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MLTMISFH

@misc{pith2026260715720,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-Order Topological FFLO Transition and Superconducting Diode Sign Reversal in Altermagnetic Nanowires},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MLTMISFH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15720}
}
abstract

Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state conventionally emerges via a second-order phase transition driven by finite magnetization. Here we show that a spin-orbit-coupled nanowire proximitized to $d$-wave altermagnets -- with zero net magnetization -- can realize topological FFLO states through a first-order transition, marked by a sharp sign-reversing superconducting diode effect. The altermagnetic field generates band-resolved competing pairing channels, giving rise to a double-valley free energy landscape whose global minimum switches discontinuously. It consequently leads to a first-order topological FFLO transition with simultaneous jumps in the Cooper pairing amplitude and finite center-of-mass momentum. Remarkably, this discontinuous topological reconfiguration substantially enhances the diode efficiency and drives a characteristic sharp sign reversal across the transition. The mechanism of such exotic phenomena is captured by Ginzburg--Landau theory. Our results provide a field-free altermagnetic route to topological FFLO states and identify their direct transport fingerprint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15720 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of a 1D spin-orbit-coupled nanowire proxim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Normal-state band structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a,b) Representative condensation-energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Finite-temperature phase diagram in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Self-consistent evolution across the cFFLO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ferromagnetic superconductors

    V . Ginzburg, “Ferromagnetic superconductors”, Sov. Phys. JETP4, 153 (1957)

    1957

  2. [2]

    Pairing mechanism in fe-based superconduc- tors

    A. Chubukov, “Pairing mechanism in fe-based superconduc- tors”, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matt. Phys.3, 57 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    Ferromagnetism in superconduct- ing alloys

    L. Gorkov and A. Rusinov, “Ferromagnetism in superconduct- ing alloys”, Sov. Phys. JETP19, 922 (1964)

    1964

  4. [4]

    Mag- netically mediated superconductivity in heavy fermion com- pounds

    N. D. Mathur, F. M. Grosche, S. R. Julian, I. R. Walker, D. M. Freye, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, and G. G. Lonzarich, “Mag- netically mediated superconductivity in heavy fermion com- pounds”, Nature394, 39 (1998)

    1998

  5. [5]

    Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures

    A. I. Buzdin, “Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures”, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 935 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    Superconducting spintron- ics

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, “Superconducting spintron- ics”, Nat. Phys.11, 307 (2015). 6

    2015

  7. [7]

    Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor- ferromagnet structures

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. V olkov, and K. B. Efetov, “Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor- ferromagnet structures”, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 1321 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    Superconductivity in a strong spin- exchange field

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, “Superconductivity in a strong spin- exchange field”, Phys. Rev.135, A550 (1964)

    1964

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    Nonuniform state of su- perconductors

    A. I. Larkin and Y . N. Ovchinnikov, “Nonuniform state of su- perconductors”, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 762 (1965)

    1965

  2. [10]

    Inhomogeneous stripe phase revisited for surface superconductivity

    V . Barzykin and L. P. Gor’kov, “Inhomogeneous stripe phase revisited for surface superconductivity”, Phys. Rev. Lett89, 227002 (2002)

    2002

  3. [11]

    The physics of pair-density waves: Cuprate superconductors and beyond

    D. F. Agterberg, J. C. S. Davis, S. D. Edkins, E. Fradkin, D. J. Van Harlingen, S. A. Kivelson, P. A. Lee, L. Radzihovsky, J. M. Tranquada, and Y . Wang, “The physics of pair-density waves: Cuprate superconductors and beyond”, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 231 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Superconducting spin smecticity ev- idencing the fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov state in sr2ruo4

    K. Kinjo, M. Manago, S. Kitagawa, Z. Q. Mao, S. Yonezawa, Y . Maeno, and K. Ishida, “Superconducting spin smecticity ev- idencing the fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov state in sr2ruo4”, Science376, 397 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y . Yanagi, Y . Motome, and H. Seo, “Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets”, Nat. Commun.10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spon- taneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, “Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spon- taneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets”, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Spin-neutral currents for spintronics

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y . Tsymbal, “Spin-neutral currents for spintronics”, Nat. Commun.12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism”, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrel- ativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, “Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrel- ativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry”, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, “Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics”, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Fragile unconventional magnetism inruo 2 by proximity to landau-pomeranchuk insta- bility

    Z. Qian, Y . Yang, S. Liu, and C. Wu, “Fragile unconventional magnetism inruo 2 by proximity to landau-pomeranchuk insta- bility”, Phys. Rev. B111, 174425 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Ferroelectric Switchable Altermag- netism

    M. Gu, Y . Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y . Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, “Ferroelectric Switchable Altermag- netism”, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, “Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials”, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Or- dering

    S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, “Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Or- dering”, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, “Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic mnte”, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Two-dimensional alter- magnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, “Two-dimensional alter- magnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model”, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Crystal Thermal Transport in Al- termagneticRuO 2

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y . Mokrousov, and Y . Yao, “Crystal Thermal Transport in Al- termagneticRuO 2”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering

    V . Leeb, A. Mook, L. Šmejkal, and J. Knolle, “Spontaneous formation of altermagnetism from orbital ordering”, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236701 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y . Lee,et al., “Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic mnte”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermagnetism

    Y . Liu, J. Yu, and C.-C. Liu, “Twisted Magnetic Van der Waals Bilayers: An Ideal Platform for Altermagnetism”, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 206702 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlí ˇrová,et al., “Altermagnetic lifting of kramers spin degeneracy”, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current

    H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, “Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current”, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Topological insulators and superconductors based on𝑝-wave magnets: Electrical control and detection of a do- main wall

    M. Ezawa, “Topological insulators and superconductors based on𝑝-wave magnets: Electrical control and detection of a do- main wall”, Phys. Rev. B110, 165429 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. F. Venderbos, “Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Probing k-space alternating spin polarization via the anomalous hall effect

    R. Chen, Z.-M. Wang, K. Wu, H.-P. Sun, B. Zhou, R. Wang, and D.-H. Xu, “Probing k-space alternating spin polarization via the anomalous hall effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 096602 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Altermagnetism-induced topological phase transitions in the kane-mele model

    Z. Li, Z. Li, and Z. Qiao, “Altermagnetism-induced topological phase transitions in the kane-mele model”, Phys. Rev. B111, 155303 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal

    M. Dürrnagel, H. Hohmann, A. Maity, J. Seufert, M. Klett, L. Klebl, and R. Thomale, “Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 036502 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Super- conducting phenomena in systems with unconventional mag- nets

    Y . Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y . Tanaka, and J. Cayao, “Super- conducting phenomena in systems with unconventional mag- nets”, J. Phys. Condens. Matter37, 313003 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Symmetry clas- sification for alternating excitons in two-dimensional altermag- nets

    J. D. Cao, K. S. Denisov, Y . Liu, and I. Žuti´c, “Symmetry clas- sification for alternating excitons in two-dimensional altermag- nets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 266703 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Altermagnetic proximity effect

    Z. Zhu, R. Huang, X. Chen, Z. Cui, X. Duan, J. Zhang, I. Žuti´c, and T. Zhou, “Altermagnetic proximity effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186702 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor

    L.-S. Liu, K. Shao, H.-D. Li, X. Wan, W. Chen, and D. Y . Xing, “Altermagnetic spin precession and spin transistor”, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 106301 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    Persistent spin currents in superconducting al- termagnets

    K. Monkman, J. Weng, N. Heinsdorf, A. Nocera, Y . Barlas, and M. Franz, “Persistent spin currents in superconducting al- termagnets”, Phys. Rev. X16, 011057 (2026)

    2026

  33. [41]

    Marginal metals and kosterlitz-thouless-type phase transition in disordered altermagnets

    C.-A. Li, B. Fu, H. Guo, B. Trauzettel, and S.-B. Zhang, “Marginal metals and kosterlitz-thouless-type phase transition in disordered altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 066303 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    dc Josephson Effect in Altermagnets

    J. A. Ouassou, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, “dc Josephson Effect in Altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 076003 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Phase-shifted andreev lev- els in an altermagnet josephson junction

    C. W. J. Beenakker and T. Vakhtel, “Phase-shifted andreev lev- els in an altermagnet josephson junction”, Phys. Rev. B108, 075425 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Finite-momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, “Finite-momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets”, Nat. Commun. 15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Topological super- conductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y . Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, “Topological super- conductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic metals”, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface

    M. Papaj, “Andreev reflection at the altermagnet- superconductor interface”, Phys. Rev. B108, L060508 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Andreev reflection in alter- magnets

    C. Sun, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, “Andreev reflection in alter- magnets”, Phys. Rev. B108, 054511 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Superconductor-altermagnet memory functionality without stray fields

    H. G. Giil and J. Linder, “Superconductor-altermagnet memory functionality without stray fields”, Phys. Rev. B109, 134511 7 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Altermagnetic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetization

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, “Altermagnetic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetization”, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Engineering subgap states in superconductors by altermagnetism

    B. Lu, P. Mercebach, P. Burset, K. Yada, J. Cayao, Y . Tanaka, and Y . Fukaya, “Engineering subgap states in superconductors by altermagnetism”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.03364 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Tunable second harmonic in altermagnetic Josephson junctions

    H.-P. Sun, S.-B. Zhang, C.-A. Li, and B. Trauzettel, “Tunable second harmonic in altermagnetic Josephson junctions”, Phys. Rev. B111, 165406 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Proximity- induced superconductivity and emerging topological phases in altermagnet-based heterostructures

    O. Alam, A. Pal, P. Dutta, and A. Saha, “Proximity- induced superconductivity and emerging topological phases in altermagnet-based heterostructures”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.26894 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Proximitizing altermag- nets with conventional superconductors

    N. Heinsdorf and M. Franz, “Proximitizing altermag- nets with conventional superconductors”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03774 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Topological fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov states in spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases

    W. Zhang and W. Yi, “Topological fulde–ferrell–larkin– ovchinnikov states in spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases”, Nat. Commun.4, 2711 (2013)

    2013

  47. [55]

    Gapless topological fulde–ferrell superfluidity in spin–orbit- coupled fermi gases

    Y . Cao, S.-H. Zou, X.-J. Liu, S. Yi, G.-L. Long, and H. Hu, “Gapless topological fulde–ferrell superfluidity in spin–orbit- coupled fermi gases”, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 115302 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    Inhomogeneous topological superfluidity in one- dimensional spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases

    C. Chen, “Inhomogeneous topological superfluidity in one- dimensional spin–orbit-coupled fermi gases”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 235302 (2013)

    2013

  49. [57]

    Topological fulde–ferrell superfluid in spin–orbit-coupled atomic fermi gases

    X.-J. Liu and H. Hu, “Topological fulde–ferrell superfluid in spin–orbit-coupled atomic fermi gases”, Phys. Rev. A88, 023622 (2013)

    2013

  50. [58]

    Topological superfluids with finite-momentum pairing and majorana fermions

    C. Qu, Z. Zheng, M. Gong, Y . Xu, L. Mao, X. Zou, G. Guo, and C. Zhang, “Topological superfluids with finite-momentum pairing and majorana fermions”, Nat. Commun.4, 2710 (2013)

    2013

  51. [60]

    Field-free superconducting diode effect and topological fulde-ferrell superconductivity in altermagnetic shiba chains

    D. Samanta and S. K. Ghosh, “Field-free superconducting diode effect and topological fulde-ferrell superconductivity in altermagnetic shiba chains”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21446 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Altermagnetism and su- perconductivity: A short historical review

    Z. Liu, H. Hu, and X.-J. Liu, “Altermagnetism and su- perconductivity: A short historical review”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.09170 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov states and topological bogoliubov fermi surfaces in altermag- nets: An analytical study

    Z. Liu, H. Hu, and X.-J. Liu, “Fulde-ferrell-larkin-ovchinnikov states and topological bogoliubov fermi surfaces in altermag- nets: An analytical study”, Phys. Rev. B113, 024518 (2026)

    2026

  54. [63]

    Altermagnetism-driven fflo superconduc- tivity in finite-filling 2d lattices

    X.-J. Liu and H. Hu, “Altermagnetism-driven fflo superconduc- tivity in finite-filling 2d lattices”, (2026), arXiv:2601.06735 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2026 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers

    Y . A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, “Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers”, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  56. [65]

    Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures

    G. Dresselhaus, “Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende structures”, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    1955

  57. [66]

    Perfect supercon- ducting diode effect in altermagnets

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, “Perfect supercon- ducting diode effect in altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 026001 (2025)

    2025

  58. [67]

    Pair density waves and supercurrent diode effect in altermagnets

    G. Sim and J. Knolle, “Pair density waves and supercurrent diode effect in altermagnets”, Phys. Rev. B112, L020502 (2025)

    2025

  59. [68]

    S1) lattice model, (Sec

    See Supplemental Material for details of (Sec. S1) lattice model, (Sec. S2) mean-field treatment of FFLO pairing and zero-temperature free energy , (Sec. S3) particle-hole symmetry andZ 2 topological invariant, (Sec. S4) phase diagram as a func- tion of chemical potential, (Se...

  60. [69]

    Superconducting diode effect in multichannel majorana wires

    S. Santra, D. Samanta, and S. K. Ghosh, “Superconducting diode effect in multichannel majorana wires”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01207 (2026)

    2026

  61. [70]

    Kramers fulde-ferrell state and su- perconducting spin diode effect

    Y . Zhang and Z. Wang, “Kramers fulde-ferrell state and su- perconducting spin diode effect”, Phys. Rev. B107, 224510 (2023)

    2023

  62. [71]

    Classi- fication of topological quantum matter with symmetries

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y . Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, “Classi- fication of topological quantum matter with symmetries”, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  63. [72]

    Bogoliubov fermi surfaces: General theory, magnetic order, and topology

    P. M. R. Brydon, D. F. Agterberg, H. Menke, and C. Timm, “Bogoliubov fermi surfaces: General theory, magnetic order, and topology”, Phys. Rev. B98, 224509 (2018)

    2018

  64. [73]

    Altermagnetism induced bogoliubov fermi surfaces form topological superconductivity

    B. Fu, C.-A. Li, and B. Trauzettel, “Altermagnetism induced bogoliubov fermi surfaces form topological superconductivity”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.20049 (2025)

    2025

  65. [74]

    Crossed surface flat bands in three-dimensional superconducting alter- magnets

    Y . Fukaya, B. Lu, K. Yada, Y . Tanaka, and J. Cayao, “Crossed surface flat bands in three-dimensional superconducting alter- magnets”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14724 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Identifying bogoliubov fermi surfaces via thermoelectric response in a𝑑-wave superconduc- tor heterostructure

    A. Pal, P. Dutta, and A. Saha, “Identifying bogoliubov fermi surfaces via thermoelectric response in a𝑑-wave superconduc- tor heterostructure”, Phys. Rev. B110, 245417 (2024)

    2024

  67. [76]

    Intra-unit-cell sin- glet pairing mediated by altermagnetic fluctuations

    Y .-M. Wu, Y . Wang, and R. M. Fernandes, “Intra-unit-cell sin- glet pairing mediated by altermagnetic fluctuations”, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 156001 (2025)

    2025

  68. [77]

    Topological ultranodal pair states in iron-based su- perconductors

    C. Setty, S. Bhattacharyya, Y . Cao, A. Kreisel, and P. J. Hirschfeld, “Topological ultranodal pair states in iron-based su- perconductors”, Nat. Commun.11, 523 (2020)

    2020

  69. [78]

    Symmetry, nodal structure, and bogoliubov fermi surfaces for nonlocal pairing

    C. Timm and A. Bhattacharya, “Symmetry, nodal structure, and bogoliubov fermi surfaces for nonlocal pairing”, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094529 (2021)

    2021

  70. [79]

    Using disorder to identify bogoliubov fermi-surface states

    H. Oh, D. F. Agterberg, and E.-G. Moon, “Using disorder to identify bogoliubov fermi-surface states”, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 257002 (2021)

    2021

  71. [80]

    Supercurrent diode effect and finite- momentum superconductors

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, “Supercurrent diode effect and finite- momentum superconductors”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  72. [81]

    Co- existence of chiral majorana edge states and bogoliubov fermi surfaces in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic dirac semimetal/superconductor heterostructures

    Y . Mo, X.-J. Wang, Z.-Y . Zhuang, and Z. Yan, “Co- existence of chiral majorana edge states and bogoliubov fermi surfaces in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic dirac semimetal/superconductor heterostructures”, Phys. Rev. B111, L140504 (2025)

    2025

  73. [82]

    Angle-dependent evolution of the fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov state in an organic superconductor

    R. Beyer, B. Bergk, S. Yasin, J. A. Schlueter, and J. Wos- nitza, “Angle-dependent evolution of the fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov state in an organic superconductor”, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 027003 (2012)

    2012

  74. [83]

    First-order topological quantum phase transition in a strongly correlated ladder

    S. Barbarino, G. Sangiovanni, and J. C. Budich, “First-order topological quantum phase transition in a strongly correlated ladder”, Phys. Rev. B99, 075158 (2019)

    2019

  75. [84]

    First-order quantum phase transition in three-dimensional topological band insulators

    V . Juriˇci´c, D. S. L. Abergel, and A. V . Balatsky, “First-order quantum phase transition in three-dimensional topological band insulators”, Phys. Rev. B95, 161403(R) (2017)

    2017

  76. [85]

    First-order topological phase transitions and disorder-induced majorana modes in interacting fermion chains

    S. Agarwal, S. Gawande, S. Nishimoto, J. van den Brink, and S. Kumar, “First-order topological phase transitions and disorder-induced majorana modes in interacting fermion chains”, Phys. Rev. B107, L121106 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    First-order super- conducting transition ofsr 2ruo4

    S. Yonezawa, T. Kajikawa, and Y . Maeno, “First-order super- conducting transition ofsr 2ruo4”, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 077003 (2013)

    2013

  78. [87]

    Intrinsic superconducting diode effect

    A. Daido, Y . Ikeda, and Y . Yanase, “Intrinsic superconducting diode effect”, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  79. [88]

    Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder

    S. Ili ´c and F. S. Bergeret, “Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder”, Phys. 8 ❷❶ ❸ ❶ ❷ ❸ FIG. 5. Self-consistent evolution across the cFFLO→nFFLO→ tFFLO sequence [gray cut in Fig. 2(b)]. (a) Optimal pairing ampli- tude (blue...

    2022

  80. [89]

    A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes

    J. J. He, Y . Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, “A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes”, New Journal of Physics24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  81. [90]

    Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corpo- ration, 2004)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity(Courier Corpo- ration, 2004)

    2004

  82. [91]

    A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu,et al., “A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet”, Nat. Phys.21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  83. [92]

    Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a lay- ered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y . Qiao, et al., “Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a lay- ered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate”, Nat. Phys.21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  84. [93]

    Observation of super- conducting diode effect

    F. Ando, Y . Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y . Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y . Yanase, and T. Ono, “Observation of super- conducting diode effect”, Nature584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  85. [94]

    Zero-field polarity-reversible josephson supercurrent diodes enabled by a proximity-magnetized pt barrier

    K.-R. Jeon, J.-K. Kim, J. Yoon, J.-C. Jeon, H. Han, A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and S. S. P. Parkin, “Zero-field polarity-reversible josephson supercurrent diodes enabled by a proximity-magnetized pt barrier”, Nat. Mater.21, 1008 (2022). END MATTER The main text focuses on the first...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.