Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Exotic mesons dissociate before deconfinement in a unified holographic framework, the paper claims.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 19:07 UTC pith:KSU6MLSG

load-bearing objection A clean technical derivation of massive spin-1 spectral functions, but the central claim that π1 and Zc melt before deconfinement does not follow because the calculation uses the black-hole branch below T_c. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.17071 v1 pith:KSU6MLSG submitted 2026-07-19 hep-ph

Holographic spectral functions of exotic spin-1 mesons

classification hep-ph
keywords holographic QCDspectral functionexotic spin-1 mesonsProca fieldgluon condensatehybrid meson π1tetraquark-like Zcmembrane flow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a holographic recipe for thermal spectral functions of exotic spin-1 mesons, with the bulk Proca mass encoding the canonical ultraviolet dimension of the boundary operator. Applied to the light hybrid π1 and the tetraquark-like Zc channels in a gluon-condensate background, it predicts that both ground states dissociate at temperatures well below the confinement–deconfinement transition, and that a stronger gluon condensate delays the melting. The Zc resonance melts at a lower temperature than the π1 resonance for every benchmark environment considered. A sympathetic reader would take the central message to be that exotic spin-1 states can be treated on equal footing in holography, and that their in-medium survival is governed by the gluon-condensate scale rather than by the vacuum mass alone.

Core claim

The paper establishes a general prescription for computing retarded correlators and spectral functions of massive spin-1 fields at zero spatial momentum in an arbitrary diagonal black-hole background. Using a radial membrane-flow equation with an infalling horizon condition, it shows that the spectral function can be obtained from the boundary value of a conductivity, with an additional cutoff-dependent normalization fixed by the operator's scaling dimension. In the gluon-condensate geometry, the hybrid π1 channel (dimension-5 operator, Proca mass squared 8/L²) and the tetraquark-like Zc channel (dimension-6 operator, Proca mass squared 15/L²) are analyzed with fixed soft-wall profiles. The

What carries the argument

The membrane-flow formalism for a massive Proca field at zero spatial momentum: a radial Riccati equation for the conductivity σ(ω;z) with the horizon value fixed by the infalling-wave condition, plus a UV-rescaled spectral function ρ̂_X(ω) obtained by dividing the renormalized spectral density by ω^{2Δ-4}. The bulk mass m₅²L² = (Δ-1)(Δ-3) ties each channel to the canonical ultraviolet dimension of its QCD interpolating current, making the framework channel-dependent through both the Proca mass and a fixed soft-wall profile Φ_X(z).

Load-bearing premise

The spectral functions are computed in the black-hole (deconfined) geometry at temperatures below the Hawking–Page transition, even though that branch is thermodynamically disfavored there; if the physical medium is the confined geometry, the claimed sub-Tc dissociation may not be real.

What would settle it

Compute the same spectral functions in the confined thermal-AdS/dilaton-wall geometry for T < T_c and check whether the ground-state peak broadens and drops to the 5–6.7% height criterion at the quoted dissociation temperatures; if the peak survives to higher T in the confined branch, the central claim that dissociation occurs below T_c fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Within the model, hybrid and tetraquark-like spin-1 mesons should melt before deconfinement, so their disappearance cannot serve as a direct deconfinement signal.
  • A stronger gluon condensate delays dissociation in both channels, meaning the QCD vacuum structure directly sets the in-medium survival scale.
  • The Zc-like resonance systematically dissociates at lower temperature than the π1-like resonance in the same environment, so peak-position stability (Zc is nearly mass-stable) must be distinguished from thermal survival.
  • The ratios T_diss/T_c lie in a narrow band (0.44–0.54) across all benchmarks, suggesting a roughly universal melting scale tied to the transition temperature.
  • The framework extends to other exotic spin-1 channels and to backgrounds with density, magnetic field, rotation, or anisotropy without changing the flow equations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Below the Hawking–Page temperature the model continues to use the black-hole branch even though the confined thermal-AdS/dilaton-wall branch is thermodynamically preferred; computing spectral functions on the confined branch would be a direct test of whether the predicted sub-Tc dissociation is physical.
  • Extrapolating the monotonic trend suggests that even at c = 0 the dissociation temperatures would lie below 51 MeV (π1) and 48 MeV (Zc), but the paper does not compute this limit, so it remains an inference.
  • The q = 0 restriction means the prediction applies to mesons at rest in the medium; extending the membrane flow to finite momentum could connect to dilepton or photon observables in heavy-ion collisions, where moving resonances probe different conditions.
  • The near-constancy of T_diss/T_c across c hints that the melting scale tracks the phase-transition scale itself; testing this in other channels (e.g., charmonium or bottomonium) within the same machinery would show whether it is a general feature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a bottom-up holographic approach to thermal spectral functions of exotic spin-1 mesons. Section 2 derives a membrane-flow (Riccati) formalism for a massive Proca field in a general diagonal black-hole background, including the infalling condition, holographic renormalization, and the UV-rescaled spectral function. Section 3 specializes to the π1 hybrid and Zc tetraquark-like channels in a gluon-condensate dilaton background. With soft-wall profiles fixed from the c=0 calibration, the model predicts c-dependent vacuum masses (Table 2) and finite-temperature spectral functions. Using a normalized peak-height criterion, the authors obtain dissociation temperatures T_diss^π1 = 51, 65, 75, 83 MeV and T_diss^Zc = 48, 61, 72, 82 MeV for c = 0.001, ..., 0.004 GeV^4, all below the Hawking-Page temperatures T_c = 108.9–154.0 MeV, and conclude that both exotic channels dissociate before deconfinement and that Zc melts at a lower temperature than π1.

Significance. The Section 2 derivation is a genuine strength: the Proca mass-dimension relation, the UV source normalization, and the zero-momentum reduction to a single Riccati equation are presented cleanly and appear internally consistent. The application to two channels with different UV dimensions within one framework is useful and goes beyond existing soft-wall spectral-function studies. However, the advertised physics conclusion is not yet established. The finite-temperature calculation uses the black-hole branch at all temperatures down to 1 MeV, even though the same model orders the confined dilaton-wall branch below T_c; and the operational dissociation criterion is not accompanied by any uncertainty or robustness analysis. These issues affect the two central quantitative claims of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1, §3.4; Eq. (3.12)] The central claim that dissociation precedes deconfinement is obtained by computing spectral functions in the black-hole geometry (3.2) for T < T_c, including the reference point T0 = 1 MeV. However, Eq. (3.12) gives ΔF = F_dBH − F_tdAdS = (L^3/2κ_5^2)(3a + 4c − 4f), which is positive for T < T_c; the thermodynamically preferred phase is the thermal dilaton-wall geometry (3.10). The paper never computes spectral functions in that confined geometry, nor does it argue that the metastable black-hole branch describes the physical medium below T_c. Therefore the statement that 'dissociation temperatures remain below the corresponding Hawking–Page transition temperatures' is not supported by the calculation as presented. The authors must either justify the use of the metastable branch or compute the confined-phase spectral functions and recompute T_diss; otherwise the headline conclusion shoul
  2. [§3.4, Eq. (3.39)] The dissociation temperature is defined by the threshold 5% ≤ R_X(T_diss,c) ≤ 6.67% for the normalized peak height. This is an arbitrary operational criterion, and the paper gives no numerical error bars on peak heights, peak positions, or T_diss. The channel-ordering claim is based on differences of only 1–3 MeV between T_diss^Zc and T_diss^π1 (Table 3); these differences are comparable to the likely numerical discretization uncertainty of the spectral-function integration and peak tracking. I ask the authors to provide convergence checks in the radial and frequency grids, an estimate of the uncertainty in T_diss, and a demonstration that the ordering Zc < π1 is stable when the threshold is varied over a reasonable range.
  3. [§3.4; Eq. (3.37)] The reference peak height H_X(T0,c) is taken at T0 = 1 MeV in the black-hole geometry, and the authors argue that the lowest peak is continuously connected to the c-dependent vacuum state. This is plausible, but no tracking algorithm is described and no evidence is given that the tracked maximum is the same state at higher T rather than a new broad structure, especially for π1 where the vacuum mass shifts substantially and the width grows. A plot of the tracked peak position and width versus T, or a description of the tracking procedure, would make the dissociation temperatures reproducible.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.3, text near Eq. (3.21)] Typo: 'depend onceven' should be 'depend on c even'.
  2. [Table 3] The header could be clearer: separate columns for T_diss/T_c and T_diss/M_vac would avoid ambiguity about which ratio is being reported for each channel.
  3. [§3.4, Eq. (3.39)] The criterion should state explicitly whether dissociation is defined by the first temperature at which R falls below 6.67%, and what role the 5% lower bound plays in the definition.
  4. [§3.4] The text mentions thermal masses and FWHM, but no values are reported. Either provide them in a table or state explicitly that they are used only qualitatively.
  5. [Figures 2 and 4] The right panels are at T = 1 MeV, the lowest computed temperature, not at T = 0. State this in the captions to avoid confusion with the zero-temperature vacuum spectrum.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: dissociation temperatures are genuine model outputs, not fitted inputs or renamed results.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities—the dissociation temperatures T_diss^π1 and T_diss^Zc—are produced by numerically integrating the membrane-flow equation (2.15)/(3.41) with infalling horizon conditions, starting from model parameters fixed at c=0 from the independent calibration of [39] and from bulk Proca masses fixed by the UV dimensions of the chosen interpolating currents. The normalized-height dissociation criterion (3.38)-(3.39) is an operational definition: R_X(T,c) is computed from the spectral function, and the reported temperatures are outputs, not inputs. No equation sets T_diss equal to a fitted parameter or to the Hawking-Page temperature by construction. The c-benchmark is anchored to lattice Tc values [56,57] and to the published free-energy calculation [51]; although [51] is co-authored by one of the present authors, it is an externally checkable analytic result that does not contain the target dissociation temperatures, so it does not make the derivation circular. Self-citations [51] and [54] are noted but are not load-bearing in a way that reduces the argument to itself. The use of the black-hole geometry below the Hawking-Page temperature is a physical/model-selection concern about thermodynamic stability, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard holographic modeling choices rather than target-data fitting: soft-wall parameters are prior calibrations, c is a phenomenological input, and the dissociation criterion is a convention. No new particles, forces, or extra dimensions are introduced; the massive bulk vector fields are the standard duals of the interpolating operators.

free parameters (4)
  • gluon-condensate parameter c = 0.001–0.004 GeV^4
    Chosen as a phenomenological input: c = 0.004 reproduces T_c ≈ 154 MeV from lattice data, and the lower range is selected by a 20% ground-state mass-shift tolerance. It is not fitted to the dissociation temperatures.
  • soft-wall profile parameters Θ_X = {κ, M, √Γ, α} for π1 and Zc = π1: 0.468, 0.20, 0.12, 0.034; Zc: 1.75, 1.44, 0.30, 0.539
    Taken from the c = 0 calibration of [39]; the entire finite-c calculation depends on these fitted values.
  • dissociation-height threshold R = 5% ≤ R ≤ 6.67%
    Operational definition of dissociation temperature; chosen following [36]. Different thresholds would shift T_diss.
  • ground-state mass-shift tolerance δmax = 20%
    Hand-chosen internal consistency criterion used to justify the c range; not a physical bound.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT and bottom-up holographic dictionary: QCD operators are dual to bulk fields.
    The entire spectral-function calculation relies on the holographic correspondence; stated in the Introduction.
  • standard math Proca mass-dimension relation m_5^2 L^2 = (Δ-1)(Δ-3) for a one-form in AdS5.
    Used in Eq. (2.3) to fix m_5^2 from Δ = 5,6.
  • domain assumption The representative QCD currents in Eqs. (3.14) and (3.16) fix Δ_π1 = 5 and Δ_Zc = 6; anomalous dimensions and operator mixing are neglected.
    Stated in Sec. 3.2; the bulk mass assignments depend on this identification.
  • domain assumption The Einstein-dilaton background with gluon condensate parameter c is a valid holographic dual for the QCD vacuum.
    The geometry in Sec. 3.1 is taken from [51]; c is identified with the gluon condensate via the z^4 dilaton coefficient.
  • ad hoc to paper The channel soft-wall profile Φ_X(z) is kept fixed independent of c; all c-dependence enters through the metric.
    This is an explicit scheme choice made in Sec. 3; a refit of Φ_X in the deformed background would change the results.
  • standard math At zero spatial momentum, V_t and V_z decouple from the spatial components and can be set to zero consistently.
    Justified in Sec. 2 around Eq. (2.6); verified from the Proca constraint.
  • ad hoc to paper The black-hole branch is the correct background for spectral functions even below the Hawking–Page transition temperature.
    Used throughout Sec. 3.4; below T_c the thermal-AdS geometry has lower free energy, and the paper does not discuss the phase stability issue.
  • ad hoc to paper A normalized peak-height threshold defines physical dissociation.
    Eqs. (3.37)–(3.39) define dissociation; this is a phenomenological criterion, not a direct pole/width calculation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18650 in / 26196 out tokens · 236325 ms · 2026-08-01T19:07:44.400115+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop a general holographic framework for computing thermal spectral functions of exotic spin--1 mesons. A bulk Proca mass encodes the canonical ultraviolet dimension of the interpolating operator, allowing channels with different ultraviolet scaling to be treated within a unified membrane-flow formalism in the zero-spatial-momentum limit. We test this framework in a soft-wall model with a gluon-condensate background for the hybrid $\pi_1$ and tetraquark-like $Z_c$ channels. The results show that dissociation temperatures of both channels lie below the phase transition temperatures. Increasing $c$ delays dissociation in both channels, but through different effects: both the vacuum-mass shift and thermal spectral deformation contribute in the $\pi_1$ channel, whereas the latter dominates in the $Z_c$ channel. Nevertheless, for the same environment, the $Z_c$ resonance dissociates at a lower temperature than the $\pi_1$ resonance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17071 by Yan-qing Zhao, Zhou-Run Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectral function ˆρπ1 (ω) of the hybrid π1 channel at T = 1 MeV and c = 0.001 GeV4 . T=20 MeV T=30 MeV T=40 MeV T=50 MeV 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 0 2 4 6 8 10 ω (GeV)  ρ π1 (ω) c=0.001 GeV4 c=0.002 GeV4 c=0.003 GeV4 c=0.004 GeV4 1.36 1.38 1.40 1.42 1.44 1.46 0 2 4 6 8 10 ω (GeV)  ρ π1 (ω) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectral function ˆρπ1 (ω) of the hybrid π1 channel. The left panel illustrates the temperature evolution at fixed gluon-condensate parameter c = 0.001 GeV4 , while the right panel shows the modi￾fication induced by varying c at fixed temperature T = 1 MeV. 3.4.1 π1 channel We first discuss the thermal spectral function of the hybrid π1 channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spectral function ˆρZc (ω) of the tetraquark-like Zc channel at T = 1 MeV and c = 0.001 GeV4 . mation. Increasing T shifts the ground-state peak to a lower frequency, reduces the peak height, and increases the thermal width. These features indicate the gradual loss of the ground-state resonance structure with increasing temperature. On the other hand, increasing c shifts the low-temperature ground-state pe… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral function ˆρZc (ω) for the tetraquark-like Zc channel. The left panel illustrates the temperature evolution at fixed gluon-condensate parameter c = 0.001 GeV4 , while the right panel shows the modification induced by varying c at fixed temperature T = 1 MeV. π1 channel Zc channel c (GeV4 ) Tc (MeV) Mvac π1,0 (MeV) T π1 diss (MeV) T π1 diss Tc T π1 diss Mvac π1,0 Mvac Zc,0 (MeV) T Zc diss (MeV) T Zc… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 51 linked inside Pith

  1. [5]

    J/ψSuppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation,

    T. Matsui and H. Satz, “J/ψSuppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation,” Phys. Lett. B 178(1986) 416–422

  2. [6]

    Colour deconfinement and quarkonium binding,

    H. Satz, “Colour deconfinement and quarkonium binding,” J. Phys. G32(2006) R25, arXiv:hep-ph/0512217. 18

  3. [7]

    Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica,

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, “Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.93(2017) 143–194,arXiv:1610.04528 [hep-ph]

  4. [8]

    Hadronic molecules,

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, “Hadronic molecules,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90no. 1, (2018) 015004,arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)]

  5. [9]

    Hybrid Mesons,

    C. A. Meyer and E. S. Swanson, “Hybrid Mesons,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.82(2015) 21–58, arXiv:1502.07276 [hep-ph]. [10]BESIIICollaboration, M. Ablikim et al., “Observation ofZ c(3900)0 ine +e− →π 0π0J/ψ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115no. 11, (2015) 112003,arXiv:1506.06018 [hep-ex]

  6. [11]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

  7. [12]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

  8. [13]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150

  9. [14]

    Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,

    S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007,arXiv:0804.0434 [hep-th]

  10. [15]

    A holographic critical point,

    O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser, and C. Rosen, “A holographic critical point,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 086005,arXiv:1012.1864 [hep-th]

  11. [16]

    Phase Structure in a Dynamical Soft-Wall Holographic QCD Model,

    S. He, S.-Y. Wu, Y. Yang, and P.-H. Yuan, “Phase Structure in a Dynamical Soft-Wall Holographic QCD Model,” JHEP04(2013) 093,arXiv:1301.0385 [hep-th]

  12. [17]

    A Refined Holographic QCD Model and QCD Phase Structure,

    Y. Yang and P.-H. Yuan, “A Refined Holographic QCD Model and QCD Phase Structure,” JHEP11(2014) 149,arXiv:1406.1865 [hep-th]

  13. [18]

    Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below deconfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model,

    D. Dudal and S. Mahapatra, “Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below deconfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 12, (2017) 126010,arXiv:1708.06995 [hep-th]

  14. [19]

    Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics,

    R. Critelli, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, “Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 9, (2017) 096026,arXiv:1706.00455 [nucl-th]

  15. [20]

    Hot and dense quark-gluon plasma thermodynamics from holographic black holes,

    J. Grefa, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, “Hot and dense quark-gluon plasma thermodynamics from holographic black holes,” Phys. Rev. D104 no. 3, (2021) 034002,arXiv:2102.12042 [nucl-th]

  16. [21]

    Holographic model for heavy quarks in anisotropic hot dense QGP with external magnetic field,

    I. Y. Aref’eva, K. Rannu, and P. Slepov, “Holographic model for heavy quarks in anisotropic hot dense QGP with external magnetic field,” JHEP07(2021) 161,arXiv:2011.07023 [hep-th]

  17. [22]

    Phase structure and critical phenomena in two-flavor QCD by holography,

    Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, and Z. Li, “Phase structure and critical phenomena in two-flavor QCD by holography,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 086015,arXiv:2310.13432 [hep-ph]

  18. [23]

    Phase diagram of holographic thermal dense QCD matter with rotation,

    Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, and Z. Li, “Phase diagram of holographic thermal dense QCD matter with rotation,” JHEP04(2023) 115,arXiv:2212.14662 [hep-ph]

  19. [24]

    QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 261602,arXiv:hep-ph/0501128. 19

  20. [25]

    Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005,arXiv:hep-ph/0602229

  21. [26]

    Light and heavy mesons in a soft-wall holographic approach,

    T. Branz, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, I. Schmidt, and A. Vega, “Light and heavy mesons in a soft-wall holographic approach,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 074022,arXiv:1008.0268 [hep-ph]

  22. [27]

    Hadronic spectrum of a holographic dual of QCD,

    G. F. de Teramond and S. J. Brodsky, “Hadronic spectrum of a holographic dual of QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 201601,arXiv:hep-th/0501022

  23. [28]

    Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, “Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 113(2005) 843–882,arXiv:hep-th/0412141

  24. [29]

    More on a holographic dual of QCD,

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto, “More on a holographic dual of QCD,” Prog. Theor. Phys.114(2005) 1083–1118,arXiv:hep-th/0507073

  25. [30]

    Heavy quarkonium spectrum and decay constants from a neural-network-based holographic model,

    Y. Zhang, X. Chen, and M. A. Martin Contreras, “Heavy quarkonium spectrum and decay constants from a neural-network-based holographic model,” Phys. Rev. D113no. 12, (2026) 126029,arXiv:2601.18133 [hep-ph]

  26. [31]

    Holographic Picture of Heavy Vector Meson Melting,

    N. R. F. Braga, M. A. Martin Contreras, and S. Diles, “Holographic Picture of Heavy Vector Meson Melting,” Eur. Phys. J. C76no. 11, (2016) 598,arXiv:1604.08296 [hep-ph]

  27. [32]

    Decay constants in soft wall AdS/QCD revisited,

    N. R. F. Braga, M. A. Martin Contreras, and S. Diles, “Decay constants in soft wall AdS/QCD revisited,” Phys. Lett. B763(2016) 203–207,arXiv:1507.04708 [hep-th]

  28. [33]

    Holographic model for charmonium dissociation,

    N. R. F. Braga, L. F. Ferreira, and A. Vega, “Holographic model for charmonium dissociation,” Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 476–481,arXiv:1709.05326 [hep-ph]

  29. [34]

    Nonlinear Regge trajectories with AdS/QCD,

    M. A. Martin Contreras and A. Vega, “Nonlinear Regge trajectories with AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 4, (2020) 046007,arXiv:2004.10286 [hep-ph]

  30. [35]

    Melting Spectral Functions of the Scalar and Vector Mesons in a Holographic QCD Model,

    M. Fujita, T. Kikuchi, K. Fukushima, T. Misumi, and M. Murata, “Melting Spectral Functions of the Scalar and Vector Mesons in a Holographic QCD Model,” Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 065024, arXiv:0911.2298 [hep-ph]

  31. [36]

    ExoticJ P C= 1−+ mesons in a holographic model of QCD,

    L. Bellantuono, P. Colangelo, and F. Giannuzzi, “ExoticJ P C= 1−+ mesons in a holographic model of QCD,” Eur. Phys. J. C74no. 4, (2014) 2830,arXiv:1402.5308 [hep-ph]

  32. [37]

    Bottomonium dissociation in a finite density plasma,

    N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, “Bottomonium dissociation in a finite density plasma,” Phys. Lett. B773(2017) 313–319,arXiv:1704.05038 [hep-ph]

  33. [38]

    Heavy meson dissociation in a plasma with magnetic fields,

    N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, “Heavy meson dissociation in a plasma with magnetic fields,” Phys. Lett. B783(2018) 186–192,arXiv:1802.02084 [hep-ph]

  34. [39]

    Holographic QCD model for heavy and exotic mesons at finite density: A self-consistent dynamical approach,

    B. Toniato, D. Dudal, S. Mahapatra, R. da Rocha, and S. S. Jena, “Holographic QCD model for heavy and exotic mesons at finite density: A self-consistent dynamical approach,” Phys. Rev. D 111no. 12, (2025) 126021,arXiv:2502.12694 [hep-th]

  35. [40]

    Dissociation of heavy quarkonium from a data-driven holographic QCD model*,

    Z.-R. Zhu, M. Sun, W.-J. Mao, X.-L. Li, M.-L. Tian, and S.-S. Lu, “Dissociation of heavy quarkonium from a data-driven holographic QCD model*,” Chin. Phys. C50no. 4, (2026) 043105

  36. [41]

    Chiral transition and meson melting within improved holographic soft wall models,

    A. Ballon-Bayona, S. Bartz, L. A. H. Mamani, and D. M. Rodrigues, “Chiral transition and meson melting within improved holographic soft wall models,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 026011,arXiv:2410.23471 [hep-ph]

  37. [42]

    Vector meson spectral function in a dynamical AdS/QCD model,

    Y.-Q. Zhao and D. Hou, “Vector meson spectral function in a dynamical AdS/QCD model,” Eur. Phys. J. C82no. 12, (2022) 1102,arXiv:2108.08479 [hep-ph]. 20

  38. [43]

    Melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model,

    D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, “Melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model,” Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 086002,arXiv:1410.3297 [hep-th]

  39. [44]

    J/Ψ suppression in a rotating magnetized holographic QGP matter,

    Y.-Q. Zhao and D. Hou, “J/Ψ suppression in a rotating magnetized holographic QGP matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 11, (2023) 1076,arXiv:2306.04318 [hep-ph]

  40. [45]

    A dynamical Einstein-Born-Infeld-dilaton model and holographic quarkonium melting in a magnetic field,

    S. S. Jena, J. Barman, B. Toniato, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, “A dynamical Einstein-Born-Infeld-dilaton model and holographic quarkonium melting in a magnetic field,” JHEP12(2024) 096,arXiv:2408.14813 [hep-th]

  41. [46]

    Bottomonium dissociation in a rotating plasma,

    N. R. F. Braga and Y. F. Ferreira, “Bottomonium dissociation in a rotating plasma,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 9, (2023) 094017,arXiv:2309.11643 [hep-ph]

  42. [47]

    Heavy quarkonium spectral function in the spinning black hole background,

    Z.-R. Zhu, M. Sun, R. Zhou, Z. Ma, and J. Han, “Heavy quarkonium spectral function in the spinning black hole background,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 12, (2024) 1252,arXiv:2406.19661 [hep-ph]

  43. [48]

    Heavy quarkonium spectral function in an anisotropic background,

    W.-B. Chang and D.-f. Hou, “Heavy quarkonium spectral function in an anisotropic background,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 086010,arXiv:2403.04966 [hep-ph]

  44. [49]

    Late Hadronization and Matter Formed at RHIC: Vector Manifestation, Brown-Rho Scaling and Hadronic Freedom,

    G. E. Brown, J. W. Holt, C.-H. Lee, and M. Rho, “Late Hadronization and Matter Formed at RHIC: Vector Manifestation, Brown-Rho Scaling and Hadronic Freedom,” Phys. Rept.439 (2007) 161–191,arXiv:nucl-th/0608023

  45. [50]

    The Effect of gluon condensate on holographic heavy quark potential,

    Y. Kim, B.-H. Lee, C. Park, and S.-J. Sin, “The Effect of gluon condensate on holographic heavy quark potential,” Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 105016,arXiv:0808.1143 [hep-th]

  46. [51]

    Gravitational waves from holographic QCD phase transition with gluon condensate,

    Z.-R. Zhu, J. Chen, and D. Hou, “Gravitational waves from holographic QCD phase transition with gluon condensate,” Eur. Phys. J. A58no. 6, (2022) 104,arXiv:2109.09933 [hep-ph]

  47. [52]

    A holographic relation between the deconfinement temperature and gluon condensate,

    S. S. Afonin, “A holographic relation between the deconfinement temperature and gluon condensate,” Phys. Lett. B809(2020) 135780,arXiv:2005.01550 [hep-ph]

  48. [53]

    Holographic imaginary potential of a quark antiquark pair in the presence of gluon condensation,

    S. Tahery, X. Chen, and Z.-q. Zhang, “Holographic imaginary potential of a quark antiquark pair in the presence of gluon condensation,” JHEP03(2023) 207,arXiv:2208.01233 [hep-ph]

  49. [54]

    The effect of gluon condensate on imaginary potential and thermal width from holography,

    Y.-Q. Zhao, Z.-R. Zhu, and X. Chen, “The effect of gluon condensate on imaginary potential and thermal width from holography,” Eur. Phys. J. A56no. 2, (2020) 57,arXiv:1909.04994 [hep-ph]

  50. [55]

    Entropic destruction of heavy quarkonium in quark-gluon plasma with gluon condensate,

    Z.-q. Zhang and D.-f. Hou, “Entropic destruction of heavy quarkonium in quark-gluon plasma with gluon condensate,” Phys. Lett. B803(2020) 135301

  51. [56]

    The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,

    A. Bazavov et al., “The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition,” Phys. Rev. D 85(2012) 054503,arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]. [57]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavov et al., “Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD,” Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094503,arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

  52. [58]

    Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,” Nature561no. 7723, (2018) 321–330, arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

  53. [59]

    Analysis of theX(3872),Z c(3900) andZ c(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules,

    Z.-G. Wang and T. Huang, “Analysis of theX(3872),Z c(3900) andZ c(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules,” Phys. Rev. D89no. 5, (2014) 054019, arXiv:1310.2422 [hep-ph]. 21

  54. [60]

    Heavy quarkonia spectroscopy at zero and finite temperature in bottom-up AdS/QCD,

    M. A. Martin Contreras, S. Diles, and A. Vega, “Heavy quarkonia spectroscopy at zero and finite temperature in bottom-up AdS/QCD,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 086008, arXiv:2101.06212 [hep-ph]. [61]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, M. Tanabashi et al., “Review of Particle Physics,” Phys. Rev. D98no. 3, (2018) 030001. 22