Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Global asymptotics, not local curvature alone, determine whether string modulus preheating is efficient; Swampland light towers mainly reshape existing resonance bands rather than opening a new channel.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 15:23 UTC pith:7FTN5EAF

load-bearing objection The global-asymptotics classification of moduli self-resonance is a solid, useful contribution; the stochastic SDC-tower conclusion rests on a free noise variance and is not yet established. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.18442 v1 pith:7FTN5EAF submitted 2026-07-20 hep-th hep-ph

Global Asymptotics, the Swampland Conjectures, and Preheating of String Moduli

Leia Price , Kuver Sinha , Robert Wiley Deal This is my paper
classification hep-th hep-ph
keywords preheatingstring moduliSwampland conjecturestachyonic resonanceFloquet analysisstochastic Hill equationlarge volume scenarioKKLT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the efficiency of self-resonant preheating of string moduli — the exponential amplification of a modulus's own fluctuations as it oscillates after inflation — is governed by the global shape of its potential, not merely the local curvature data that Swampland conjectures constrain. Two potentials with similar local inflection data can produce parametrically different tachyonic amplification once their asymptotic tails are taken into account, because the tails fix how long the field dwells in the tachyonic region and how it recovers into a stiff regime. In concrete type IIB compactifications, this means runaway potentials like KKLT can support efficient self-resonance (growth rate γ/H ≈ 10), plateau potentials like blow-up moduli are inefficient (γ/H ≈ 0.3), and the LVS volume modulus sits in between. The paper also models the tower of light states predicted by the Swampland Distance Conjecture as a stochastic environment and finds that it mainly smears, shifts, and mildly seeds instabilities in existing resonance bands rather than opening a new reheating channel. A careful reader would care because preheating sets the post-inflationary thermal history and determines whether heavy moduli can be diluted, connecting Swampland constraints to observable early-universe cosmology.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the tachyonic branch of the refined de Sitter Conjecture yields a local curvature diagnostic — the second slow-roll parameter η_V = M_pl^2 |V''|/V — that is necessary but not sufficient for efficient self-resonant preheating of a string modulus. The full contribution from tachyonic oscillation depends also on the dwell time inside the tachyonic region and on the recovery to a stiff, up-curving regime, both controlled by the global asymptotics of the potential: plateaus, barriers, and runaways. In the concrete compactifications studied, KKLT runaway potentials give growth rates γ/H ≈ 10, the LVS volume modulus gives γ/H ≈ 1, and plateau-

What carries the argument

The central object is the Hill equation for the Fourier modes of the modulus fluctuation, δφ_k, whose time-dependent frequency is set by the oscillating zero mode through m_eff^2(t) = V''(φ̄(t)); the analysis proceeds by Floquet theory, with the growth rate γ extracted from the transfer matrix over an oscillation period. The load-bearing identity is the integrated tachyonic gain per cycle, ln G_k ≈ ∮ dφ̄ √η_V / √(2(V(Φ)/V(φ) − 1)), which shows explicitly that tachyonic amplification depends on both the local curvature diagnostic η_V and the global ratio V(Φ)/V(φ) — that is, on how steeply the potential falls and how long the field dwells in the unstable region. For the tower of light states,

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tower of light states predicted by the Swampland Distance Conjecture can be coarse-grained into a Gaussian stochastic environment with a freely chosen cycle-to-cycle variance; if a few coherent modes dominate the backreaction, or if the variance cannot be derived from tower parameters, the conclusion that light towers only mildly reshape resonance bands is not established.

What would settle it

Compute the effective mode number N_eff and the dimensionless variance ratio ϵ_ξ defined in Appendix D directly from the KK masses and initial amplitudes of an explicit compactification; if N_eff ≈ 1 or ϵ_ξ ≫ 1, the Gaussian approximation fails and the claim that towers only mildly seed instabilities is falsified. Alternatively, a lattice simulation that resolves the tower as explicit fields should, for moderate tower masses, reproduce the noiseless Floquet bands with only modest broadening; observing a strong new instability band in a previously stable region would contradict the paper's stoc

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In Dine-Seiberg runaway compactifications such as KKLT, self-resonant preheating of the volume modulus can be efficient, with growth rates γ/H on the order of 10, making fragmentation and oscillon formation plausible for the oscillating modulus.
  • In plateau-like blow-up potentials, tachyonic self-resonance is inefficient — γ/H around 0.3 — so reheating in these corners must rely on channels beyond the modulus's own self-interactions.
  • The tachyonic branch of the refined de Sitter Conjecture, through its lower bound on η_V, favors local curvature that enhances tachyonic gain; Swampland-motivated curvature data thus points toward, but does not guarantee, efficient self-resonance.
  • For the stochastic treatment, the SDC tower acts mainly as a dephaser: it smears and shifts existing resonance bands and produces at most small growth (γ/H ≲ 0.1) in regions stable in the noiseless map, so a modulus plus a light KK tower is unlikely to preheat the universe efficiently on its own.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the stochastic coarse-graining holds beyond the LVS/KKLT examples, the same cycle-to-cycle noise mechanism should apply to any SDC tower — winding modes, string excited states, or axion-like particles — predicting that light towers generically erode sharp resonance wedges in moduli preheating across the landscape.
  • The runaway-versus-plateau contrast suggests a selection rule the paper does not state: compactifications whose moduli potentials have Dine-Seiberg runaways are more likely to experience efficient self-preheating and avoid the cosmological moduli problem, while plateau-type moduli likely need explicit couplings to other sectors.
  • The validity conditions in Appendix D could be turned into an explicit test: computing N_eff and ϵ_ξ for a concrete Calabi-Yau KK spectrum would determine whether the Gaussian noise regime is actually realized, and would sharpen or overturn the paper's stochastic conclusion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies self-resonant preheating of a single string modulus, with two Swampland-motivated themes. First, it argues that the local curvature diagnostic η_V = M_pl^2 |V''/V|, related to the refined de Sitter conjecture, is insufficient to determine tachyonic resonance efficiency; the global shape of the potential determines how long the oscillating condensate dwells in the tachyonic region. Using a semi-analytic tachyonic-gain formula (Eq. 2.11) and Floquet maps, it categorizes plateau-type potentials (blow-up moduli, α-attractor models) as inefficient (γ/H ~ 0.3) and runaway-type potentials (LVS, KKLT) as more efficient (γ/H ~ 1–10). Second, the paper models SDC light KK towers as a stochastic, cycle-to-cycle Gaussian modulation of the Hill equation and finds that moderate noise mainly smears, shifts, and mildly seeds existing resonance bands, rather than opening a robust new reheating channel; energy deposition into the KK sector is argued to be minimal.

Significance. If the deterministic conclusion holds, the paper provides a useful and relatively simple diagnostic — Eq. (2.11) — that connects local curvature, global asymptotics, and preheating efficiency, and it extends the preheating discussion to the Swampland program. The paper is honest about the qualitative nature of the γ/H expansion treatment and about the limitations of the stochastic model; the Floquet maps and semi-analytic comparisons are reproducible in structure. The stochastic conclusion, however, is currently conditional: the variance of the effective noise is not derived from the tower parameters, and the paper's own Appendix D lists the required validity conditions without computing them. The central claim about global asymptotics is supported by the derivation of Eq. (2.11), but the numerical examples do not cleanly separate local and global effects.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (3.7), and Appendix D] The variance of the stochastic noise ξ is never computed from the tower parameters. After Fig. 13 the text states that the Gaussian result allows the authors 'to freely choose the variance of ξ entering our numerical estimates.' This is a free dial, not a derived quantity. Appendix D lists the conditions for the stochastic approximation (N_eff ≫ 1, no single dominant mode, ϵ_ξ ≲ 1, ρ_χ ≪ ρ_φ) but does not evaluate any of them for the LVS/KKLT spectra or for the assumed initial KK amplitudes X_n. Since the paper's abstract claims that SDC towers mainly reshape rather than open a robust channel, that conclusion is not yet established. A calculation or controlled bound on Var(ξ) — from m_n0, X_n, α, and the cycle average in Eq. (D.1) — is needed to connect the stochastic maps to a physical regime.
  2. [§2.3–2.5] The numerical demonstration that global asymptotics, rather than local curvature alone, controls preheating efficiency is not cleanly isolated. The blow-up example has η_V < 1 in the tachyonic region, while KKLT has η_V ≫ 1; the difference in γ/H could therefore be attributed to local curvature alone. Eq. (2.11) analytically shows the additional global factor V(Φ)/V(φ), which is the paper's main point, but the examples pair different local and global data simultaneously. A matched comparison — two potentials with similar local η_V profiles but different asymptotic tails, or a decomposition of Eq. (2.11) into local and global contributions — would make the title's claim more robust.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (2.11)] The formula as written appears dimensionally inconsistent unless one explicitly sets M_pl = 1. Please state the unit convention, or write the integrand with φ normalized by M_pl.
  2. [Fig. 13 caption] The caption says 'a tower of 20 coherently oscillating scalars χ_i with masses n m_n0 e^{-αφ_1/M_pl}, where integers n∈(0,10^4) are sampled uniformly.' It should clarify whether 20 modes are sampled from that range, and what the resulting distribution of masses is.
  3. [§3.2, around Eq. (3.7)] The notation is confusing: ξ^2 is defined in Eq. (3.7), but the text treats ξ as the Gaussian noise (as in Fig. 13). Specify whether the Gaussian variable is ξ or ξ², since the latter is chi-square distributed with one degree of freedom.
  4. [Appendix D] The conditions N_eff ≫ 1, max_n σ_n^2/Σσ_m^2 ≪ 1, ϵ_ξ ≲ 1, and ρ_χ ≪ ρ_φ are listed but not evaluated. Even an order-of-magnitude estimate for the LVS benchmark would help the reader assess whether the stochastic regime is physically realized.
  5. [General] Typos: 'Institude' in the first affiliation; 'depeding' in the caption of Fig. 8. Also, the α-attractor section (2.4) largely refers to prior work without showing Floquet maps; this is acceptable but should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; Eq. (2.11) is a direct rearrangement, and the stochastic variance is an openly free input, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The deterministic chain is self-contained: substituting the energy relation 1/2 dot-phi^2 + V = rho0 into the tachyonic gain integral (Eqs. 2.6-2.10) gives Eq. (2.11) directly, so the claim that global asymptotics/dwell time matters is read off from the integral rather than assumed. The Floquet maps are numerical outputs of the stated potentials, and comparisons with external Refs. [32] and [41] provide independent checks. The only self-citation with current-author overlap, [30], is contextual (earlier axion-preheating work) and is not used to force the self-resonance conclusion. The stochastic section is the weakest point but is not circular: Sec. 3.2 explicitly says the Gaussian result allows the authors 'to freely choose the variance of xi entering our numerical estimates', so the band-smearing conclusion is an input-conditioned survey rather than a prediction derived from tower parameters. Appendix D lists but does not compute the validity conditions (N_eff >> 1, no single mode dominating, epsilon_xi <= 1, rho_chi << rho_phi), which is a support/validity gap, not a self-referential reduction. I also note that Sec. 3.1 attributes [52] to 'a subset of the current authors' while the reference list shows no author overlap with this paper; as [52] is an external published calculation, this attribution error does not by itself create circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central deterministic claim rests on standard Floquet/Hill methods and on illustrative potential parameters from string compactifications. The stochastic claim rests on a modeling device whose variance is freely chosen, which is the most significant unaccounted input. No new physical entity is independently predicted.

free parameters (6)
  • blow-up potential coefficient α = e (Sec. 2.3, Fig. 5)
    Dimensionless parameter in V(φ)=M^4[1−α(φ/Mpl)e^{−φ/Mpl}]; set to e for a zero-energy minimum, not derived from the compactification.
  • LVS benchmark parameters = W0=As=as/2π=λ=γ=ξ=1 (Fig. 9)
    All LVS potential parameters are set to unity by hand in Appendix A; an illustrative choice, not a scan.
  • KKLT benchmark parameters = W0=10^{-5}, A=10, a=2π (Fig. 11)
    Representative parameter choices from [32] used for the KKLT potential; not varied.
  • stochastic noise variance = sqrt(Var(ξ/m)) ∈ {0.5, 1, 5}
    Gaussian noise variance in Eq. (3.7) is 'freely chosen' (Sec. 3.2); all stochastic conclusions depend on it.
  • SDC exponent α in tower masses = 1/2, 1, or max from [53] in different figures
    Exponent in m_n0 e^{-α Δφ/Mpl} (Eqs. 3.4, 3.7); model-dependent and hand-selected.
  • KK tower initial amplitudes X_n = unspecified
    χ_n(t)=X_n cos(m_nt) in Eq. (3.8); the amplitudes set the variance of ξ but are not fixed by the model.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Linearized fluctuations obey Eq. (2.3) with m_eff^2 = V''(φbar(t)) and a stochastic correction (Eq. 3.7).
    Standard Hill-equation truncation for preheating; neglects metric perturbations, backreaction on the background, and full multifield structure (Secs. 2, 3).
  • domain assumption Hubble expansion can be neglected in Floquet maps and accounted for by the ratio γ/H.
    Used throughout Sec. 2; the authors explicitly note the approximation is qualitative (Secs. 2.1–2.2).
  • domain assumption SDC tower masses scale as m_n(φ) ~ m_n0 exp(−α Δφ/Mpl).
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1 from [49,53].
  • ad hoc to paper Tower backreaction can be represented by cycle-to-cycle Gaussian noise with no inter-period correlation.
    Postulated in Sec. 3.2 and Appendix D; no derivation from tower parameters; the paper states the variance is freely chosen.
  • ad hoc to paper Central limit theorem applies to ξ, with N_eff ≫ 1 and no single dominant mode.
    Used in Sec. 3.2 and App. D; conditions (D.6)–(D.7) are assumed, not computed.
  • domain assumption Dine-Seiberg runaway and the explicit LVS/KKLT potential forms are the relevant vacuum structure.
    Standard string compactification input (Sec. 2.5, Apps. A–B).
invented entities (1)
  • Effective stochastic noise term ξ(t) no independent evidence
    purpose: Coarse-grained representation of SDC light KK tower backreaction on the modulus fluctuation equation (Eq. 3.7).
    ξ has no independent observable handle: its variance is a hand-chosen input, so the entity is an effective modeling device rather than a predicted new physical state.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21572 in / 18636 out tokens · 142266 ms · 2026-08-01T15:23:06.361982+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

While the cosmological implications of the Swampland Conjectures are usually discussed in the context of inflationary model building, they also have implications for the violent, non-adiabatic dynamics that can follow inflation or any displacement of string moduli. We study this question through the lens of self-resonant preheating, where we point out that two Swampland motivated structures play central roles. The first is the local curvature of the potential: the tachyonic branch of the refined de Sitter Conjecture singles out the kind of negative curvature that can drive tachyonic amplification. We show, however, that local curvature data is not enough; the large field asymptotics of the potential determines how the modulus samples the unstable region. Thus, plateaus, barriers, and runaways can lead to different resonance efficiencies; we study tachyonic resonance for bulk moduli in LVS and KKLT compactifications, as well as for typical blow-up moduli potentials and alpha-attractor models. The second Swampland motivated structure pertains to the tower of light states predicted by the Swampland Distance Conjecture. Modeling a finite subset of such states as an effective stochastic environment within which a string modulus preheats, we find that the light states mainly reshape existing resonance bands by smearing, shifting, and mildly seeding instabilities, rather than opening a robust new reheating channel. Our results suggest that Swampland physics affects preheating by controlling both the deterministic curvature structure of the potential as well as stochastic corrections from emergent light states.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 51 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder ´on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Ooguri and C

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    Ooguri, E

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 180 [1810.05506]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Agrawal, G

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied, P.J. Steinhardt and C. Vafa,On the Cosmological Implications of the String Swampland,Phys. Lett. B784(2018) 271 [1806.09718]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Scalisi and I

    M. Scalisi and I. Valenzuela,Swampland distance conjecture, inflation andα-attractors,JHEP 08(2019) 160 [1812.07558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Reece, L.-T

    M. Reece, L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Large-field inflation and the cosmological collider, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L101304 [2204.11869]. – 34 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Bravo, G.A

    R. Bravo, G.A. Palma and S. Riquelme,A Tip for Landscape Riders: Multi-Field Inflation Can Fulfill the Swampland Distance Conjecture,JCAP02(2020) 004 [1906.05772]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    L ¨ust, J

    D. L ¨ust, J. Masias, B. Muntz and M. Scalisi,Starobinsky inflation in the swampland,JHEP07 (2024) 186 [2312.13210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Garg and C

    S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan,Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland,JHEP11 (2019) 075 [1807.05193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    G. Kane, K. Sinha and S. Watson,Cosmological Moduli and the Post-Inflationary Universe: A Critical Review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) 1530022 [1502.07746]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,Open J

    R. Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,Open J. Astrophys.4(2021) astro.2006.16182 [2006.16182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Batell et al.,Conversations and deliberations: Non-standard cosmological epochs and expansion histories,Int

    B. Batell et al.,Conversations and deliberations: Non-standard cosmological epochs and expansion histories,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A40(2025) 2530004 [2411.04780]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Dine and N

    M. Dine and N. Seiberg,Is the Superstring Weakly Coupled?,Phys. Lett. B162(1985) 299

    1985

  15. [15]

    Kofman, A.D

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky,Reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.73 (1994) 3195 [hep-th/9405187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  16. [16]

    Kofman, A.D

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde and A.A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 3258 [hep-ph/9704452]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  17. [17]

    Silverstein and A

    E. Silverstein and A. Westphal,Monodromy in the CMB: Gravity Waves and String Inflation, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 106003 [0803.3085]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    McAllister, E

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, A. Westphal and T. Wrase,The Powers of Monodromy,JHEP09 (2014) 123 [1405.3652]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Superconformal generalizations of the Starobinsky model,JCAP06 (2013) 028 [1306.3214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Carrasco, R

    J.J.M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh and A. Linde,α-Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy,JHEP 10(2015) 147 [1506.01708]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Amin, M.P

    M.A. Amin, M.P. Hertzberg, D.I. Kaiser and J. Karouby,Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2014) 1530003 [1410.3808]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Lozanov and M.A

    K.D. Lozanov and M.A. Amin,Equation of State and Duration to Radiation Domination after Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 061301 [1608.01213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    Leedom, M

    J.M. Leedom, M. Putti, N. Righi and A. Westphal,Preheating axions in string cosmology, JHEP04(2025) 095 [2411.18496]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo and I. Zavala,String cosmology: From the early universe to today,Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1 [2303.04819]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Kofman, A.D

    L. Kofman, A.D. Linde, X. Liu, A. Maloney, L. McAllister and E. Silverstein,Beauty is attractive: Moduli trapping at enhanced symmetry points,JHEP05(2004) 030 [hep-th/0403001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  26. [26]

    Greene, S

    B. Greene, S. Judes, J. Levin, S. Watson and A. Weltman,Cosmological moduli dynamics, JHEP07(2007) 060 [hep-th/0702220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Shuhmaher and R

    N. Shuhmaher and R. Brandenberger,Non-perturbative instabilities as a solution of the cosmological moduli problem,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 043519 [hep-th/0507103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Alsarraj and R

    M. Alsarraj and R. Brandenberger,Moduli and graviton production during moduli stabilization,JCAP09(2021) 008 [2103.07684]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    M.A. Amin, J. Fan, K.D. Lozanov and M. Reece,Cosmological dynamics of Higgs potential fine tuning,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 035008 [1802.00444]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Wiley Deal, L

    R. Wiley Deal, L. Barrowes, J.T. Giblin, K. Sinha, S. Watson and F.C. Adams,Cosmological Moduli and Non-perturbative Production of Axions,2501.17229

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Giblin, G

    J.T. Giblin, G. Kane, E. Nesbit, S. Watson and Y . Zhao,Was the Universe Actually Radiation Dominated Prior to Nucleosynthesis?,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 043525 [1706.08536]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Antusch, F

    S. Antusch, F. Cefala, S. Krippendorf, F. Muia, S. Orani and F. Quevedo,Oscillons from String Moduli,JHEP01(2018) 083 [1708.08922]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    M.A. Amin, R. Easther, H. Finkel, R. Flauger and M.P. Hertzberg,Oscillons After Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 241302 [1106.3335]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Barrowes, F.C

    L. Barrowes, F.C. Adams, A.M. Bloch, J.T. Giblin and S. Watson,Generalized models for inflationary preheating: Oscillations and symmetries,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123511

    2024

  35. [35]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (5, 2015), 10.1017/CBO9781316105733, [1404.2601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    McAllister and E

    L. McAllister and E. Silverstein,String Cosmology: A Review,Gen. Rel. Grav.40(2008) 565 [0710.2951]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  37. [37]

    McAllister and F

    L. McAllister and F. Quevedo,Moduli Stabilization in String Theory,2310.20559

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V . Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition,Phys. Dark Univ.5-6(2014) 75 [1303.3787]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Conlon and F

    J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Kahler moduli inflation,JHEP01(2006) 146 [hep-th/0509012]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    Bansal,Loop Blow-up Inflation: An Overview, 4, 2026 [2604.07288]

    S. Bansal,Loop Blow-up Inflation: An Overview, 4, 2026 [2604.07288]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Khan, A.C

    I. Khan, A.C. Vincent and G. Worthey,Preheating and reheating effects of the K ¨ahler moduli inflation I model,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 103546 [2111.11050]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Lozanov and M.A

    K.D. Lozanov and M.A. Amin,Self-resonance after inflation: oscillons, transients and radiation domination,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023533 [1710.06851]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Adshead, J.T

    P. Adshead, J.T. Giblin, Jr. and R. Pfaltzgraff-Carlson,Kinetic preheating afterα-attractor inflation,Phys. Lett. B856(2024) 138928 [2311.17237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Grana,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys

    M. Grana,Flux compactifications in string theory: A Comprehensive review,Phys. Rept.423 (2006) 91 [hep-th/0509003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  45. [45]

    Douglas and S

    M.R. Douglas and S. Kachru,Flux compactification,Rev. Mod. Phys.79(2007) 733 [hep-th/0610102]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  46. [46]

    Conlon, F

    J.P. Conlon, F. Quevedo and K. Suruliz,Large-volume flux compactifications: Moduli spectrum and D3/D7 soft supersymmetry breaking,JHEP08(2005) 007 [hep-th/0505076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    Cicoli, J.P

    M. Cicoli, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,General Analysis of LARGE Volume Scenarios with String Loop Moduli Stabilisation,JHEP10(2008) 105 [0805.1029]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    Kachru, R

    S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi,De Sitter vacua in string theory,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  49. [49]

    Corvilain, T.W

    P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and I. Valenzuela,The Swampland Distance Conjecture for K ¨ahler moduli,JHEP08(2019) 075 [1812.07548]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Zanchin, A

    V . Zanchin, A. Maia, Jr., W. Craig and R.H. Brandenberger,Reheating in the presence of noise, Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 4651 [hep-ph/9709273]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  51. [51]

    Zanchin, A

    V . Zanchin, A. Maia, Jr., W. Craig and R.H. Brandenberger,Reheating in the presence of inhomogeneous noise,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) a023505 [hep-ph/9901207]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Barrowes, F.C

    L. Barrowes, F.C. Adams, A.M. Bloch and S. Watson,Fluctuations in Hill’s equation parameters and application to cosmic reheating,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083505 [2507.08075]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    L ¨ust, J

    D. L ¨ust, J. Masias, M. Pieroni and M. Scalisi,Inflationary Particle Production and the Swampland,2512.07930

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Adams and A.M

    F.C. Adams and A.M. Bloch,Hill’s equation with small fluctuations: Cycle to cycle variations and stochastic processes,Journal of Mathematical Physics54(2013) . – 37 –

    2013