Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 99 references

This paper argues that dense nuclear matter in holographic QCD is better described as a crystal of interacting solitons than as a uniform fluid, yielding an equation of state whose neutron-star predictions fall inside modern radius constrai

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 13:21 UTC pith:SKR7GRJE

load-bearing objection A genuinely new FCC soliton-crystal EOS for WSS dense matter that is a clear advance over the homogeneous ansatz, but the load-bearing two-baryon potential is used outside its controlled regime at the densities that anchor the NS claims. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19125 v1 pith:SKR7GRJE submitted 2026-07-21 hep-ph hep-th

Holographic Soliton Crystals for Dense Nuclear Matter and Neutron Stars

Lorenzo Bartolini , Sven Bjarke Gudnason , Jonas Mager , Anton Rebhan This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-th
keywords holographic QCDWitten-Sakai-Sugimoto modelnuclear matter equation of statesoliton crystalinstanton baryonsneutron starsincompressibilitysymmetry energy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to show that the long-standing failure of holographic QCD to reproduce nuclear-matter saturation properties is an artifact of the 'homogeneous ansatz' that smears baryons into a uniform field. Replacing it with an infinite face-centered-cubic crystal of individual baryonic solitons, interacting through a two-baryon potential derived from the holographic model itself, produces an equation of state that matches the saturation density, binding energy, and incompressibility of real nuclear matter to the right order of magnitude. The same construction, extended to beta-equilibrated matter with a phenomenological symmetry energy, yields neutron-star mass-radius relations compatible with the latest radius measurements. If correct, this means the topological structure of the baryon—not the average field—carries the essential physics of dense matter, removing the need for the ad-hoc first-order transitions and extra parameters that the homogeneous approach requires.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a lattice of four Sakai-Sugimoto solitons per face-centered-cubic unit cell, with nearest neighbours locked into the most attractive SU(2) orientation, gives a nuclear-matter equation of state whose fitted parameters (lambda = 18.26, M_KK = 661.5 MeV) stay close to the vacuum meson sector while reproducing the physical baryon mass (942 MeV), binding energy (-19.3 MeV), and an incompressibility of 374.9 MeV—an order of magnitude better than the homogeneous ansatz. The resulting hybrid neutron-star equations of state pass the observed mass-radius constraints, with 1.4-solar-mass stars reaching central densities of about 2.2–2.6 times satu

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-baryon potential built from the linearized soliton tails of the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model: each baryon is a BPST instanton core whose long-distance fields are the curved-background mode sums of vector, axial-vector and pion exchanges. Summing this potential over the shells of an FCC lattice, with nearest neighbors rotated by pi in flavour space to sit in the maximally attractive channel, turns a many-soliton problem into a tractable lattice sum. The shell sum defines the energy per baryon as a function of lattice spacing, from which energy density, chemical potential, pressure and incompressibility follow.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction depends on the assumption that the force between two baryons, computed from the far-out parts of their fields, stays accurate when the baryons are close enough to nearly touch inside a neutron star; if their dense cores overlap, that force no longer applies and the equation of state is not reliable.

What would settle it

Check the pair-summed FCC energy density against a direct numerical solution of the five-dimensional field equations for a single unit cell at about two to three times nuclear saturation density; if the numerical energy differs sharply from the lattice sum, the tail-based potential is being used beyond its validity.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The FCC-crystal equation of state can be matched almost continuously to the low-density chiral effective field theory equation of state at saturation, unlike the homogeneous ansatz.
  • The incompressibility at saturation comes out at 375 MeV for the BPST fit, of the correct order of magnitude, with a density trend similar to that seen in non-holographic nuclear models.
  • The fitted reduction of the pion decay constant and the vector-meson mass follows the dense-medium scaling expected from Brown-Rho-type arguments.
  • Neutron stars built from the hybrid equation of state have mass-radius curves within the observed confidence regions, with central densities below three times saturation for typical 1.4-solar-mass stars, where the soliton approximation is still valid.
  • Even the simple-cubic lattice gives similar saturation observables, suggesting the key improvement is the localized soliton description rather than the detailed lattice geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, deriving the symmetry energy from the holographic model itself rather than from phenomenology would turn the hybrid equation of state into a fully top-down prediction and provide a sharper test of the parabolic approximation.
  • If the paper is right, the same tail-potential method could be used to explore other lattice geometries or a high-density half-Skyrmion transition; the paper's simple-cubic robustness check suggests the qualitative conclusions would survive, but the location of any phase transition would shift the predictions for the most massive neutron stars.
  • If the paper is right, the speed of sound near saturation carries a distinctive prediction; more precise radius or tidal-deformability measurements in the 1.4-solar-mass range could discriminate between this FCC-holographic equation of state and competing phenomenological ones.
  • A direct numerical solution of the five-dimensional field equations for a multi-soliton unit cell would test whether the two-body tail potential extrapolates correctly, quantifying the many-body forces that the lattice sum omits—the paper itself identifies this as the decisive future step.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a nuclear-matter equation of state in the Witten–Sakai–Sugimoto holographic QCD model by assembling an infinite FCC crystal of holographic baryons (SS solitons), rather than using the smeared homogeneous ansatz. The two-baryon interaction is taken from linearized soliton tails in the curved background matched to flat-space BPST instanton cores, with the quark mass included via the Aharony–Kutasov term. The authors calibrate the two model parameters (lambda, M_KK) to the empirical saturation density and onset chemical potential, fit the quark mass to m_pi = 135 MeV, and compute the energy density, chemical potential, pressure, incompressibility, and binding energy for symmetric matter. They then add a phenomenological symmetry energy and beta-equilibrated leptons, match to a nuclear EFT EOS below n_S, solve the TOV equations, and compare mass–radius and tidal deformability to NICER and GW170817 constraints. The headline results are K(n_S) = 374.9 MeV for the BPST parameter set and mass–radius curves compatible with NICER, in contrast to the homogeneous ansatz, which is far too stiff.

Significance. If taken at face value, this is a significant step for holographic QCD applications to dense matter: it is the first WSS-based construction that resolves individual baryons and still reaches phenomenological saturation properties and neutron-star observables. The manuscript is transparent: it provides explicit shell sums (App. B), a direct comparison with the homogeneous ansatz on equal footing (App. A), and a clear discussion of many limitations. The central quantitative results, however, rest on two uncontrolled or circular inputs. The tail–core matching that fixes the two-baryon potential is not valid in the regime used at neutron-star center densities, and the binding energy at saturation is essentially determined by the fitted onset chemical potential rather than being an independent prediction. The incompressibility and density dependence of the EOS are genuine predictions of the calibrated construction, but their reliability is dominated by the same matching uncertainty. For these reasons the paper is promising but not conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 2 and 4, Eqs. (2.16)–(2.18), (4.3), (4.7)] The two-baryon potential is derived from linearized tails sourced by point-like instantons, matched to flat-space BPST cores in an overlap region rho << xi << 1. With the BPST fit (5.1) and eta = 0.76 (4.15), Eqs. (2.10)/(2.22) give rho ~ 1.7 M_KK^{-1}, so no such overlap region exists and the normalization zeta ~ rho^4 in (4.7) is not controlled. This potential is then used at all densities in the lattice sum (4.11), including n_B ~ 2.2–2.6 n_S at the centers of 1.4 M_sun stars (Fig. 5), where R/rho ~ 2.8–3.1 (Fig. 3). The omitted (rho/R)^2 corrections are ~10%, of the same size as the claimed binding energy (5.3). Please either quantify the resulting systematic error in the EOS (e.g., by varying the matching point or by estimating core-overlap corrections) or restrict quantitative claims to densities where the tail expansion is controlled.
  2. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (4.21)–(4.22), (5.1)–(5.3)] The binding energy per nucleon is not an independent prediction. The fit fixes the onset chemical potential to mu = 922.7 MeV. At saturation P = 0, so mu_B = E_p by (4.22), and therefore E_p(n_S) - M_B = 922.7 MeV - M_B. The baryon mass M_B is computed from the same fitted lambda and M_KK via (4.12), so the value -19.3 MeV in (5.3) is essentially imposed by the fitting conditions, not a prediction. The paper should state this explicitly and present only K(n_S) and the density dependence of E_p as predictions of the calibrated EOS. A useful cross-check would be to fit (lambda, M_KK) to (n_S, K) and compare the resulting mu_onset and M_B with phenomenology.
  3. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (6.1)–(6.12)] The NICER compatibility is not a direct test of the holographic construction. The beta-equilibrated EOS uses the HLPS EOS below saturation, a phenomenological symmetry energy S(n_B) with S_0 and L taken from Ref. [85], and free Fermi-gas leptons. Thus Fig. 5 constrains the holographic isoscalar sector only in the range n_S–2.6 n_S and only in combination with empirical input. The paper is transparent about this, but the abstract and conclusions should consistently phrase the result as 'a holographic symmetric-matter EOS supplemented by phenomenological isovector and low-density input is compatible with NICER,' rather than suggesting a fully holographic prediction of neutron-star radii.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4 and App. B] The main text states that the shell sum is truncated at n_max = 8, while Table 1 in App. B tabulates multiplicities up to n = 30. Please clarify which truncation was used for the EOS and show that the sum has converged at that order.
  2. [Sec. 4, paragraph above Eq. (4.1)] The text says the space is divided into regions P, Q, and R^3 - P - Q; this should read R^3 (P ∪ Q) to avoid confusion with pressure P.
  3. [Fig. 3, left panel] The color code in the figure caption lists eight colors, but only the nearest-neighbor orientations i sigma_3, i sigma_1, i sigma_2 appear in the text. Please state whether the other colors are used for visual clarity or correspond to a specific orientation field on the lattice.
  4. [Eq. (4.18)] The label n ∈ N should specify whether n is a positive integer or non-negative integer; as written, n = 0 is included but the shell index starts at 1.
  5. [App. A and Fig. 4 caption] The homogeneous-ansatz parameters quoted in App. A (lambda, M_KK) = (7.09, 1033.3 MeV) differ from those in the Fig. 4 caption (5.79, 1119.33 MeV); the difference is explained by the choice of n_S, but a cross-reference would help the reader.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Binding energy at saturation is a fit input in disguise; the FCC EOS construction itself remains largely independent.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.1)-(5.3); thermodynamic relation Eq. (3.4)]
    "we fit the free parameters λ, MKK to the onset baryon chemical potential μ=922.7 MeV and such that the onset number density is given by nS=0.16 fm−3. ... With this fit, the (single) baryon mass from Eq. (4.12) is MB=942.0 MeV, and the binding energy per nucleon at saturation is E/A−MB=−19.3 MeV"

    At saturation P=0, so Eq. (3.4), P=−E+μ nB, gives μ=E/nB=E_p. The fit fixes μ=922.7 MeV at nS, hence E_p(nS)=922.7 MeV by construction. The reported E/A−MB = −19.3 MeV is just this fitted onset chemical potential minus M_B, where M_B is computed from the same fitted λ and M_KK via Eq. (4.12). No element of the binding energy is an independent output of the lattice sum; it is forced once μ and n_S are fitted and the model baryon mass is evaluated. Calling it 'reasonably close to phenomenology' therefore presents a fit input (through the thermodynamic relation) as a prediction.

full rationale

The main FCC EOS construction is not circular: the two-baryon potential (4.3) is derived from the linearized tail/core formalism, the lattice sum (4.11)-(4.21) is evaluated, and the incompressibility K(nS)=374.9 MeV and its density dependence are genuine outputs not fixed by the two fitted inputs. The neutron-star comparison uses a phenomenological symmetry-energy sector, not outputs recycled from the fit. The one clear circular step is the saturation binding energy: because P=0 at saturation, fitting the onset chemical potential directly fixes the energy per baryon, so the reported −19.3 MeV is algebraically the fitted μ minus the computed model baryon mass. This weakens the claim that the model 'predicts' the saturation binding energy, but it does not invalidate the EOS construction or the independent NICER comparison.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several fitted parameters (λ, M_KK, m, γ/η, S_0/L) and domain assumptions about the WSS model and the pair-potential approximation. No fundamentally new entities are introduced, but the lattice construction itself is a modeling choice rather than a derivation from the full field equations.

free parameters (5)
  • λ ('t Hooft coupling) = 18.26 (BPST set) or 45.54 (non-BPST set)
    Fitted to the onset chemical potential (922.7 MeV) and saturation density (0.16 fm^-3) in Sec. 5.
  • M_KK (WSS mass scale) = 661.5 MeV (BPST) or 457.2 MeV (non-BPST)
    Fitted together with λ to the same two nuclear-matter observables in Sec. 5.
  • m (quark mass parameter) = set to reproduce m_π = 135 MeV
    Determined by Eq. (2.21) to give the physical pion mass.
  • γ, η (curvature rescaling factors) = γ=0.80, η=0.76 (BPST); γ=0.74, η=1.02 (non-BPST)
    Taken from the numerical baryon mass calculations of Ref. [90] at λ=16.63; assumed independent of λ. They modify the baryon mass formula and instanton size in the potential.
  • S_0 and L (symmetry energy parameters) = (29.96, 32.62) MeV and (32.76, 57.01) MeV
    Phenomenological input from Ref. [85] used to extend to beta-equilibrated matter; not computed from the holographic model.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The WSS model is a valid holographic dual for low-energy QCD in the large-N_c, large-λ limit.
    The entire construction relies on the Sakai-Sugimoto model's validity; this is the standard framework of the paper.
  • domain assumption The two-baryon interaction potential (4.3) derived from linearized soliton tails is accurate at the separations used in the lattice.
    The potential is obtained for |r| >> ρ and extended to finite densities; this assumption is checked only indirectly in Fig. 3.
  • ad hoc to paper γ and η are approximately independent of λ.
    The rescaling factors from Ref. [90] are computed at λ=16.63 and assumed constant, even for the non-BPST fit with λ=45.54; the paper notes this as a limitation.
  • domain assumption The FCC crystal with nearest-neighbor attractive channel approximates the quantum liquid of baryons; kinetic-energy corrections are 1/N_c suppressed.
    The crystal is treated classically; the paper argues that short-range order in a liquid resembles the solid, but this is an approximation.
  • domain assumption The symmetry energy is well described by a single power law S(n_B)=S_0 (n_B/n_S)^{γ1}.
    Used in the parabolic approximation Eq. (6.1); this is a common but uncontrolled approximation.
  • domain assumption Below saturation density, the nuclear EFT EOS of Ref. [85] is a valid description.
    The paper switches to nuclear EFT below n_S, assuming the holographic crystal is not valid there.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28181 in / 12161 out tokens · 113434 ms · 2026-08-01T13:21:38.638550+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct a nuclear-matter equation of state (EOS) from holographic QCD in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto (WSS) model, going beyond the homogeneous ansatz by building dense baryonic matter more directly from the solitonic description of holographic baryons. Employing the two-baryon interaction potential obtained from the linearized soliton tails sourced in the curved background by point-like (core) instantons, we assemble an infinite face-centered cubic (FCC) crystal with nearest neighbors in the most attractive channel as an approximation to the quantum liquid of baryons and compute the energy density $\mathcal{E}(n_B)$, the chemical potential $\mu_B$, and the pressure $P$. We calibrate the symmetric-matter EOS by fixing the 't Hooft coupling $\lambda$ and the WSS scale $M_{\rm KK}$ to saturation-density and onset-chemical-potential properties, and by including a quark-mass term to reproduce the physical pion mass $m_\pi=135\,\mathrm{MeV}$. This fit turns out to remain reasonably close to the parameters required by the vacuum meson sector, while their modification is consistent with Brown-Rho scaling in a dense medium, and the incompressibility at saturation is of the correct order of magnitude, both in clear contrast to the homogeneous approximation. We then extend to beta-equilibrated matter, using phenomenological input for the symmetry energy, and obtain hybrid EOS and neutron-star observables that are compatible with the NICER constraints.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 77 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Burgio, H.J

    G.F. Burgio, H.J. Schulze, I. Vidana and J.B. Wei,Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.120(2021) 103879 [2105.03747]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    J¨ arvinen,Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,Eur

    M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 282 [2110.08281]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Hoyos, N

    C. Hoyos, N. Jokela and A. Vuorinen,Holographic approach to compact stars and their binary mergers,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.126(2022) 103972 [2112.08422]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    de Forcrand,Simulating QCD at finite density,PoSLA T2009(2009) 010 [1005.0539]

    P. de Forcrand,Simulating QCD at finite density,PoSLA T2009(2009) 010 [1005.0539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Polchinski and M.J

    J. Polchinski and M.J. Strassler,Hard scattering and gauge / string duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 031601 [hep-th/0109174]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Boschi-Filho and N.R.F

    H. Boschi-Filho and N.R.F. Braga,QCD / string holographic mapping and glueball mass spectrum,Eur. Phys. J. C32(2004) 529 [hep-th/0209080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    Karch, E

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005 [hep-ph/0602229]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    G¨ ursoy and E

    U. G¨ ursoy and E. Kiritsis,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,JHEP 02(2008) 032 [0707.1324]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  10. [10]

    J¨ arvinen and E

    M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis,Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,JHEP 03(2012) 002 [1112.1261]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005) 843 [hep-th/0412141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Aharony and D

    O. Aharony and D. Kutasov,Holographic Duals of Long Open Strings,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 026005 [0803.3547]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    Bolognesi and P

    S. Bolognesi and P. Sutcliffe,The Sakai-Sugimoto soliton,JHEP01(2014) 078 [1309.1396]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Sutcliffe,Skyrmions, instantons and holography,JHEP08(2010) 019 [1003.0023]

    P. Sutcliffe,Skyrmions, instantons and holography,JHEP08(2010) 019 [1003.0023]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    Atiyah and N.S

    M.F. Atiyah and N.S. Manton,Skyrmions From Instantons,Phys. Lett. B222(1989) 438

    1989

  17. [17]

    Y.-L. Ma, Y. Oh, G.-S. Yang, M. Harada, H.K. Lee, B.-Y. Park et al.,Hidden Local Symmetry and Infinite Tower of Vector Mesons for Baryons,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 074025 [1206.5460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki,Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries,Phys. Rept.164(1988) 217

    1988

  19. [19]

    Harada and K

    M. Harada and K. Yamawaki,Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition,Phys. Rept.381(2003) 1 [hep-ph/0302103]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  20. [20]

    Adkins, C.R

    G.S. Adkins, C.R. Nappi and E. Witten,Static Properties of Nucleons in the Skyrme Model,Nucl. Phys. B228(1983) 552

    1983

  21. [21]

    Manton,Skyrmions – A Theory of Nuclei, World Scientific (3, 2022), 10.1142/q0368

    N.S. Manton,Skyrmions – A Theory of Nuclei, World Scientific (3, 2022), 10.1142/q0368

    doi:10.1142/q0368 2022

  22. [22]

    Sutcliffe,Skyrmions in a truncated BPS theory,JHEP04(2011) 045 [1101.2402]

    P. Sutcliffe,Skyrmions in a truncated BPS theory,JHEP04(2011) 045 [1101.2402]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  23. [23]

    Klebanov,Nuclear Matter in the Skyrme Model,Nucl

    I.R. Klebanov,Nuclear Matter in the Skyrme Model,Nucl. Phys. B262(1985) 133

    1985

  24. [24]

    Goldhaber and N.S

    A.S. Goldhaber and N.S. Manton,Maximal Symmetry of the Skyrme Crystal,Phys. Lett. B 198(1987) 231

    1987

  25. [25]

    Kugler and S

    M. Kugler and S. Shtrikman,A New Skyrmion Crystal,Phys. Lett. B208(1988) 491

    1988

  26. [26]

    Kugler and S

    M. Kugler and S. Shtrikman,Skyrmion Crystals and Their Symmetries,Phys. Rev. D40 (1989) 3421

    1989

  27. [27]

    C. Adam, A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro and A. Wereszczynski,Skyrme Crystals, Nuclear Matter and Compact Stars,Symmetry15(2023) 899 [2305.06639]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Manton and P.M

    N.S. Manton and P.M. Sutcliffe,Skyrme crystal from a twisted instanton on a four torus, Phys. Lett. B342(1995) 196 [hep-th/9409182]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  29. [29]

    ’t Hooft,A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Nucl. Phys. B153(1979) 141

    1979

  30. [30]

    ’t Hooft,Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus, Commun

    G. ’t Hooft,Some Twisted Selfdual Solutions for the Yang-Mills Equations on a Hypertorus, Commun. Math. Phys.81(1981) 267

    1981

  31. [31]

    Rho, S.-J

    M. Rho, S.-J. Sin and I. Zahed,Dense QCD: A Holographic Dyonic Salt,Phys. Lett. B689 (2010) 23 [0910.3774]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    van Baal,Some Results for SU(N) Gauge Fields on the Hypertorus,Commun

    P. van Baal,Some Results for SU(N) Gauge Fields on the Hypertorus,Commun. Math. Phys.85(1982) 529

    1982

  33. [33]

    Nash,Gauge Potentials and Bundles Over the Four Torus,Commun

    C. Nash,Gauge Potentials and Bundles Over the Four Torus,Commun. Math. Phys.88 (1983) 319

    1983

  34. [34]

    Y.-L. Ma, M. Harada, H.K. Lee, Y. Oh, B.-Y. Park and M. Rho,Dense baryonic matter in the hidden local symmetry approach: Half-skyrmions and nucleon mass,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 014016 [1304.5638]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Ma and M

    Y.-L. Ma and M. Rho,Towards the hadron–quark continuity via a topology change in compact stars,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.113(2020) 103791 [1909.05889]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Bartolini, S

    L. Bartolini, S. Bolognesi and A. Proto,From the Sakai-Sugimoto Model to the Generalized Skyrme Model,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 014024 [1711.03873]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    C. Adam, C. Naya, J. Sanchez-Guillen, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski,BPS Skyrmions as neutron stars,Phys. Lett. B742(2015) 136 [1407.3799]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    C. Adam, C. Naya, J. Sanchez-Guillen, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski,Neutron stars in the Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield Skyrme model: Mean-field limit versus full field theory,Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 025802 [1503.03095]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    C. Adam, J. Sanchez-Guillen, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski,Adding crust to BPS Skyrme neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 023019 [2004.03610]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    C. Adam, A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro, R. V´ azquez and A. Wereszczynski,A new consistent neutron star equation of state from a generalized Skyrme model,Phys. Lett. B 811(2020) 135928 [2006.07983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Adam, A.G

    C. Adam, A.G. Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski,Dense matter equation of state and phase transitions from a generalized Skyrme model,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 074019 [2109.13946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    C. Adam, A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski, Quantum skyrmion crystals and the symmetry energy of dense matter,Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 114031 [2202.00953]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    C. Adam, A. Garcia Martin-Caro, M. Huidobro, R. Vazquez and A. Wereszczynski,Kaon condensation in skyrmion matter and compact stars,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074007 [2212.00385]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  44. [44]

    Bartolini and S.B

    L. Bartolini and S.B. Gudnason,Boundary terms in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model at finite density,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 066006 [2309.16328]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Rozali, H.-H

    M. Rozali, H.-H. Shieh, M. Van Raamsdonk and J. Wu,Cold Nuclear Matter In Holographic QCD,JHEP01(2008) 053 [0708.1322]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    S.-w. Li, A. Schmitt and Q. Wang,From holography towards real-world nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 026006 [1505.04886]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Kovensky and A

    N. Kovensky and A. Schmitt,Isospin asymmetry in holographic baryonic matter,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 029 [2105.03218]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Bartolini and S.B

    L. Bartolini and S.B. Gudnason,Symmetry energy in holographic QCD,SciPost Phys.16 (2024) 156 [2209.14309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Kovensky, A

    N. Kovensky, A. Poole and A. Schmitt,Building a realistic neutron star from holography, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 034022 [2111.03374]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Kovensky, A

    N. Kovensky, A. Poole and A. Schmitt,Predictions for neutron stars from holographic nuclear matter,SciPost Phys. Proc.6(2022) 019 [2112.10633]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Bartolini and S.B

    L. Bartolini and S.B. Gudnason,Neutron stars in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model,JHEP 11(2023) 209 [2307.11886]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Kovensky, A

    N. Kovensky, A. Poole and A. Schmitt,Phases of cold holographic QCD: Baryons, pions and rho mesons,SciPost Phys.15(2023) 162 [2302.10675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Bartolini, S.B

    L. Bartolini, S.B. Gudnason, J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan,Neutron stars and phase diagram in a hard-wall AdS/QCD model,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 126014 [2202.12845]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Fujii, A

    D. Fujii, A. Hosaka, A. Iwanaka, T. Sakai and M. Tachibana,Dense matter in a holographic hard-wall model of QCD,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 034003 [2506.06997]

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    Wang, L.-K

    J.-S. Wang, L.-K. Yang, Y.-F. Liu and Y.-L. Ma,Finite density nuclear matter and neutron stars in hard-wall AdS/QCD model,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 106008 [2508.18659]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and J. Remes,Unified weak and strong coupling framework for nuclear matter and neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 086004 [2006.01141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Bartolini, S.B

    L. Bartolini, S.B. Gudnason and M. J¨ arvinen,Isospin asymmetry and neutron stars in holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106021 [2504.01758]

    arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Ecker, M

    C. Ecker, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and W. van der Schee,Gravitational waves from holographic neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103006 [1908.03213]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Ecker, N

    C. Ecker, N. Jokela and M. J¨ arvinen,Locating the QCD critical point with input from neutron-star observations,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L041302 [2506.10065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Ghoroku, K

    K. Ghoroku, K. Kubo, M. Tachibana and F. Toyoda,Holographic cold nuclear matter and neutron star,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29(2014) 1450060 [1311.1598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Pinkanjanarod and P

    S. Pinkanjanarod and P. Burikham,Massive neutron stars with holographic multiquark cores,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 705 [2007.10615]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Hoyos, D

    C. Hoyos, D. Rodriguez Fern´ andez, N. Jokela and A. Vuorinen,Holographic quark matter and neutron stars,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 032501 [1603.02943]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Bitaghsir Fadafan, J

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, J. Cruz Rojas and N. Evans,Holographic quark matter with colour superconductivity and a stiff equation of state for compact stars,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 026012 [2009.14079]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Zhang and M

    L. Zhang and M. Huang,Holographic cold dense matter constrained by neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 096028 [2209.00766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Liu, Y.-L

    X.-Y. Liu, Y.-L. Wu and Z. Fang,Exploring QCD phase transitions and neutron star properties via holographic models,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1010 [2412.15149]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Ghoroku, K

    K. Ghoroku, K. Kashiwa, Y. Nakano, M. Tachibana and F. Toyoda,Stiff equation of state for a holographic nuclear matter as instanton gas,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 126002 [2107.14450]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Ghoroku, K

    K. Ghoroku, K. Kashiwa, Y. Nakano, M. Tachibana and F. Toyoda,Instability of holographic cold compact stars with a color superconducting core,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126007 [2303.06364]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Ecker, N

    C. Ecker, N. Kovensky, O. Papadopoulos and A. Schmitt,Softening holographic nuclear matter,JHEP03(2026) 019 [2509.02216]. – 34 –

    arXiv 2026

  69. [69]

    Gudnason and J.M

    S.B. Gudnason and J.M. Speight,Realistic classical binding energies in theω-Skyrme model,JHEP07(2020) 184 [2004.12862]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,More on a holographic dual of QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.114 (2005) 1083 [hep-th/0507073]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  71. [71]

    Hechenberger, J

    F. Hechenberger, J. Leutgeb and A. Rebhan,Radiative meson and glueball decays in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 114020 [2302.13379]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Bitaghsir Fadafan, F

    K. Bitaghsir Fadafan, F. Kazemian and A. Schmitt,Towards a holographic quark-hadron continuity,JHEP03(2019) 183 [1811.08698]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    H. Hata, T. Sakai, S. Sugimoto and S. Yamato,Baryons from instantons in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.117(2007) 1157 [hep-th/0701280]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  74. [74]

    Hashimoto, T

    K. Hashimoto, T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Holographic Baryons: Static Properties and Form Factors from Gauge/String Duality,Prog. Theor. Phys.120(2008) 1093 [0806.3122]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Belavin, A.M

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov, A.S. Schwartz and Y.S. Tyupkin,Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 85

    1975

  76. [76]

    Baldino, S

    S. Baldino, S. Bolognesi, S.B. Gudnason and D. Koksal,Solitonic approach to holographic nuclear physics,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 034008 [1703.08695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    Baldino, L

    S. Baldino, L. Bartolini, S. Bolognesi and S.B. Gudnason,Holographic Nuclear Physics with Massive Quarks,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 126015 [2102.00680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    Ghoroku, K

    K. Ghoroku, K. Kubo, M. Tachibana, T. Taminato and F. Toyoda,Holographic cold nuclear matter as dilute instanton gas,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 066006 [1211.2499]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [79]

    Preis and A

    F. Preis and A. Schmitt,Layers of deformed instantons in holographic baryonic matter, JHEP07(2016) 001 [1606.00675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  80. [80]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and J. Remes,Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,JHEP03(2019) 041 [1809.07770]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.