Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 62 references

A holographic QCD model that tracks baryon, charge, and strangeness chemical potentials predicts that net-baryon and net-charge fluctuation cumulants will peak together at collision energies around 5–7 GeV, giving a two-channel experimental

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 13:17 UTC pith:S3T46EU3

load-bearing objection A plausible multi-charge holographic model with a genuine, testable prediction—but the CEP location and the 5–7 GeV peak are sensitive to an ansatz that zero-density lattice data cannot pin down. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19149 v1 pith:S3T46EU3 submitted 2026-07-21 hep-ph

Flavor-Dependent QCD Critical Endpoint and Dual-Channel Fluctuations from Multi-Charge Holography

Zhibin Li , Danning Li , Mei Huang This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords holographic QCDcritical endpointcumulant ratiosmultiple conserved chargesfreeze-outQCD phase diagramstrangeness neutralityheavy-ion collisions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that the QCD critical endpoint can be found by watching two independent fluctuation channels at once. Its holographic model, calibrated only at zero density, tracks three conserved charges—baryon, electric, and strange—and finds that realistic freeze-out conditions push the predicted critical peaks in net-baryon and net-charge cumulant ratios into a narrow window around 5–7 GeV collision energy. If correct, this gives experiments a concrete, background-free target: both channels should show critical peaks at the same energy, with baryon fluctuations the strongest. A sympathetic reader would care because it turns a vague search for a nonmonotonic bump into a specific dual-channel prediction that can be confirmed or ruled out at low beam energies.

Core claim

The discovery is a coherent dual-channel critical signal: along chemical freeze-out trajectories constrained by strangeness neutrality and a charge-to-baryon ratio of 0.4, the ratios chi_B^3/chi_B^1, chi_B^4/chi_B^2, and chi_Q^4/chi_Q^2 all develop nonmonotonic peaks at sqrt(s_NN) ≈ 5–7 GeV, with peak heights ordered hierarchically (baryon kurtosis strongest, net-charge weakest). The same model predicts that the critical endpoint's baryon chemical potential shifts by up to about 600 MeV as the electric and strange chemical potentials vary, and that the model's zero-density calibration alone is sufficient to predict finite-density thermodynamics via exact Maxwell relations enforced holographi

What carries the argument

The central object is a five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton action with three independent U(1) gauge fields, one for each light-quark flavor, coupled to the dilaton through flavor-dependent functions Z_q(phi). Holographic renormalization enforces exact Maxwell cross-derivative relations, so the pressure and all higher susceptibilities obey grand-canonical thermodynamics without patching. The argument then runs through three cumulant ratios (net-baryon skewness and kurtosis, net-charge kurtosis) evaluated along freeze-out trajectories under strangeness neutrality and fixed charge-to-baryon ratio; their simultaneous peaks constitute the paper's testable signature.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that the dilaton potential and flavor-dependent gauge couplings, fitted only at zero density, correctly control the finite-density dynamics all the way to the critical endpoint—so the predicted CEP position and the 5–7 GeV peaks inherit that assumption.

What would settle it

A lattice-QCD calculation at finite density that excludes a critical endpoint at mu_B below about 600 MeV, or a beam-energy-scan measurement in the 5–7 GeV energy range showing no nonmonotonic peaks in net-baryon kurtosis (chi_B^4/chi_B^2) and net-charge kurtosis (chi_Q^4/chi_Q^2) simultaneously, would directly refute the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the prediction holds, beam-energy-scan experiments should see nonmonotonic peaks in net-baryon kurtosis and skewness and in net-charge kurtosis at the same collision energies near 5–7 GeV.
  • The baryon channel is predicted to carry the strongest critical signal, so net-proton measurements remain the primary probe, with net-charge as an independent confirmation channel.
  • The strong flavor dependence of the CEP location implies that the exact freeze-out conditions (strangeness neutrality, charge-to-baryon ratio) must be controlled when interpreting any apparent critical signal.
  • Data at higher energies showing only a monotonic trend would not contradict the model; the predicted signal is confined to a narrow low-energy window.
  • Because the model is calibrated only at zero density, the same framework can be extended to predict other finite-density observables without additional fitting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable consequence: the low-energy scan points (below the existing 7.7 GeV data) are where the model's prediction should be most decisively confirmed or falsified.
  • The same multi-charge machinery could predict mixed susceptibilities (e.g., baryon-charge correlations) as an additional cross-check; such cross-correlation peaks would be a sharper fingerprint than any single ratio.
  • If the predicted CEP shifts with mu_Q and mu_S as claimed, then a single freeze-out curve may approach the critical region at one specific beam energy only—making the 5–7 GeV window not merely a convenience but a structural consequence of how flavor potentials shift the endpoint.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton (EMsD) holographic model with three independent bulk U(1) gauge fields coupled to the dilaton through flavor-dependent functions Z_q(phi). The model is calibrated to zero-density lattice QCD thermodynamics and then used to predict finite-density observables along fixed mu_B/T trajectories, the CEP location in the (mu_B, mu_Q, mu_S) chemical-potential landscape, and higher-order cumulant ratios of net-baryon and net-charge fluctuations along phenomenological freeze-out lines. The central claim is that the CEP position shifts by up to ~600 MeV as mu_Q and mu_S vary, and that net-baryon and net-charge cumulant ratios exhibit coherent, hierarchical peaks at sqrt(s_NN) ~ 5-7 GeV, providing a dual-channel signature for the QCD critical point search.

Significance. If the main claim holds, the paper would provide a holographic framework with exact thermodynamic consistency across multiple conserved charges and make a falsifiable, background-free experimental prediction that could be tested with BES-II, FAIR/CBM, and NICA data. Credit is due for enforcing Maxwell cross-derivative relations at the level of holographic renormalization, for calibrating exclusively at zero density, and for demonstrating agreement with lattice Taylor-expansion data up to mu_B/T ~ 3.5. The finite-density EoS comparison is a genuine predictive success. However, the CEP location and the resulting 5-7 GeV peak are emergent outputs of an untested ansatz for V(phi) and Z_q(phi), and the freeze-out bands used to claim encompassing HRG fits are themselves generated from HRG-constrained input. The significance of the paper therefore depends on robustness tests that are not currently provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [The EMsD Model and Thermodynamic Consistency, Eqs. (2)-(3), Table I; Fig. 2] The CEP position, which controls the claimed 5-7 GeV peaks, is not constrained by the zero-density calibration. The parameters in Table I are fixed from lattice data at vanishing chemical potentials, and the finite-density validation in Fig. 2 extends only to mu_B/T <= 3.5. The CEP in Fig. 3 appears at larger mu_B/T, with mu_B^CEP up to ~600 MeV. Since the functional forms V(phi) and Z_q(phi) are chosen ad hoc, nothing in the calibration fixes the location of the CEP. Different ansatze that fit the same zero-density data could place the CEP outside the freeze-out band or erase the peaks entirely. The authors should provide a robustness test — e.g., varying the functional forms within the lattice error bands, or comparing with Bayesian analyses such as refs. [37,39] — and show that the 5-7 GeV peak persists. Without this, the central prediction is an untested extrapolation rather than a c
  2. [Flavor-Dependent CEP Landscape and Critical Fluctuations at Freeze-out; Eq. (5), Table II, Fig. 4] The statement that the EMsD model bands 'robustly encompass empirical HRG fits' is circular. The freeze-out parametrization in Eq. (5) with Table II parameters is explicitly constrained by HRG best fits from ref. [5]. The EMsD model then uses these T-mu_B bands to compute the mu_S and mu_Q bands shown in Fig. 4. Thus the agreement with HRG in the right two panels is partly built in by construction, not an independent prediction. Moreover, the claim that the peaks at 5-7 GeV are 'independent of the adopted chemical freeze-out trajectories' is not supported: all trajectories lie within the same HRG-constrained band, and whether they cross the critical region depends on the CEP location relative to that band. The authors should scan the full Table II parameter ranges and show the resulting spread of the cumulant-ratio peaks, rather than showing a single representative band.
  3. [Fig. 3 vs. Fig. 4; abstract] The large CEP shifts (mu_B^CEP up to ~600 MeV) are displayed over the full scan -270 <= mu_Q, mu_S <= 270 MeV. However, the realistic freeze-out conditions rho_S = 0 and rho_Q/rho_B = 0.4 used in Fig. 4 produce only relatively small values: mu_S up to about 100 MeV and -mu_Q up to about 20 MeV. It is unclear whether the pronounced flavor-dependent CEP displacement advertised in the abstract is realized along the actual freeze-out curves or only in the broad artificial scan. The paper should explicitly show the CEP location under the freeze-out conditions and quantify how much of the 5-7 GeV peak position is controlled by the physically relevant mu_Q and mu_S values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and Introduction] The spelling 'Einstein-Maxwells-dilaton' should be 'Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton' throughout.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The notation c_q1 phi^{c_q2} is typeset ambiguously as 'c q1 ϕ cq2'. Please write c_{q1} phi^{c_{q2}} explicitly, and define all constants in the text rather than only in Table I.
  3. [Eq. (2)] The renormalization coefficient b = -0.27435 is introduced without an explicit role in the action or in the holographic renormalization procedure. A sentence clarifying where b enters would help the reader assess the calibration.
  4. [Fig. 5] The experimental data points and error bars for chi_4^Q/chi_2^Q are difficult to distinguish at 5-7 GeV. A zoomed panel or tabulated values would improve readability and support the claim of a coherent peak.
  5. [References] Ref. [60] is an unpublished arXiv preprint and carries the main model parameters. Since this Letter builds directly on it, the relevant definitions should be self-contained or the preprint should be cited with a version/status note.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Freeze-out band 'overlap' is partly a re-description of HRG-constrained input; central CEP/cumulant prediction is not circular.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Flavor-Dependent CEP Landscape and Critical Fluctuations at Freeze-out', Eq. (5), Table II, Fig. 4]
    "The parameter ranges, constrained by optimal hadron resonance gas (HRG) model fits, are summarized in Table II. ... the bounded parameter bands predicted by the EMsD model overlap well with the optimal results of the HRG model within uncertainties."

    The freeze-out T–μB bands in Fig. 4 are produced from Eq. (5) using Table II parameters that are by the paper's own statement 'constrained by optimal HRG model fits.' The paper then calls these 'bounded parameter bands predicted by the EMsD model' and uses their overlap with HRG as validation. In the T–μB plane this overlap is true by construction rather than an independent EMsD prediction. The μS and μQ bands are solved from the EMsD equation of state subject to ρS=0 and ρQ/ρB=0.4, so they are not forced by the HRG input; hence the circularity is partial and does not extend to the central cumulant-ratio prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central result—coherent peaks in χ3B/χ1B, χ4B/χ2B, and χ4Q/χ2Q near sqrt(s_NN)≈5–7 GeV—is not obtained by fitting the target observables. The holographic model is calibrated to zero-density lattice QCD (Fig. 1) and to lattice Taylor coefficients at finite μB/T≤3.5 (Fig. 2); the freeze-out trajectories are adopted from empirical HRG parametrizations; and the cumulant ratios are computed from the model's higher-order charge derivatives. Thus the main prediction has independent content. The V(phi) and Z_q(phi) ansätze are unconstrained inputs and could move the CEP, but that is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity. The only concrete circular element is the freeze-out band validation: the T–μB bands are themselves HRG-constrained, so saying they 'encompass' HRG is a re-description of the input. This is a local validation statement, not the load-bearing derivation, so the overall score is 2. No load-bearing self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem is present; reference [60] supplies the potential, but the paper also shows direct lattice comparisons, so that self-citation is not by itself circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central prediction rests on: (i) parameters fitted to zero-density lattice data, (ii) an ad hoc ansatz for the dilaton and gauge couplings, and (iii) an external HRG-constrained freeze-out line. The model's zero-density calibration is external, but the CEP position and cumulant peaks are true outputs of the model rather than fitted targets.

free parameters (3)
  • Dilaton-potential parameters (c1, c2, c3, phi_s, b) = c1=0.71, c2=3.7e-3, c3=2.8e-5, phi_s=1085 MeV, b=-0.27435
    Taken from the authors' earlier refined EMD model [60]; fitted to zero-density lattice QCD EoS, not to the finite-density target observables.
  • Gauge-coupling parameters (light, strange) = Light (u,d): 0.042, 3.7, -0.04; strange: 0.34, 1.97, -0.06
    Z_q(phi) parameters calibrated to zero-density lattice flavor susceptibilities (Fig. 1); they are the main degrees of freedom controlling the flavor-dependent CEP shifts.
  • Freeze-out parametrization (a, b, c, d, e, T_lim, mu_Delta) = a=1785 MeV, b=0.77, c=3.5, d=1.54, e=-0.6, T_lim=148-165 MeV, mu_Delta=-20-130 MeV
    Empirical HRG-constrained range from [5] used to map collision energy to T and mu_B; not derived by the model and not fitted to the cumulant predictions.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT-like duality: the five-dimensional classical EMsD gravity theory is dual to 2+1-flavor QCD thermodynamics.
    The whole framework presupposes the holographic dictionary; invoked in the action of Eq. (1) and cannot be proven from within QCD.
  • ad hoc to paper The chosen functional forms V(phi) and Z_q(phi) in Eqs. (2)-(3) are flexible enough to extrapolate zero-density calibration to finite densities and to the CEP.
    The forms and parameter values are hand-picked; no uniqueness theorem guarantees that the zero-density fit determines the correct finite-density CEP.
  • domain assumption Strangeness neutrality rho_S=0 and a fixed charge-to-baryon ratio rho_Q/rho_B=0.4 describe realistic heavy-ion freeze-out.
    Used to fix mu_S and mu_Q in Fig. 4 and the fluctuation curves; standard in heavy-ion phenomenology but an external physics assumption.
  • domain assumption Lattice Taylor expansions at finite mu_B (refs. 53-58) are valid comparisons in the range mu_B/T <= 3.5.
    The validation in Fig. 2 assumes the lattice results are reliable; beyond this range the model is not tested against them.
invented entities (1)
  • Three independent bulk U(1) gauge fields A_u, A_d, A_s with flavor-dependent nonminimal couplings Z_q(phi) no independent evidence
    purpose: Implement coupled chemical potentials mu_B, mu_Q, mu_S and flavor-resolved thermodynamics
    They are model bookkeeping for the known conserved currents of QCD; there is no independent observable outside the model's predictions. The novelty is in the construction, not in new physical particles.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10727 in / 13699 out tokens · 125693 ms · 2026-08-01T13:17:31.651545+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We construct a thermodynamically self-consistent holographic QCD framework incorporating multiple conserved charges. By introducing three independent bulk $U(1)$ gauge fields, our Einstein-Maxwells-dilaton (EMsD) model naturally accommodates the coupled chemical potential landscape $(\mu_B, \mu_Q, \mu_S)$ inherent to realistic heavy-ion collisions. Crucially, thermodynamic consistency is enforced at the level of holographic renormalization, ensuring exact Maxwell cross-derivative relations without ad hoc patching. Calibrated exclusively at zero density, the model exhibits genuine predictive power for finite-density thermodynamics. We reveal that finite charge and strangeness densities induce pronounced nonmonotonic shifts in the critical endpoint (CEP) location. Furthermore, by mapping the freeze-out trajectories, we demonstrate that the allowed parameter bands robustly encompass empirical hadron resonance gas (HRG) fits. Within this physical regime, higher-order cumulant ratios for both net-baryon and net-charge channels exhibit coherent critical peaks at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} \approx 5\text{--}7\,\text{GeV}$. This hierarchical dual-channel signature provides a decisive, background-free strategy for the ongoing experimental search for the QCD critical point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19149 by Danning Li, Mei Huang, Zhibin Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: is organized as follows: Left panel: funda￾mental bulk thermodynamics, including scaled pressure P/T4 , energy density ϵ/T 4 , entropy density s/T 3 , and the trace anomaly I/T 4 (where I = ϵ − 3P). Middle panel: medium response functions, including the squared speed of sound c 2 s , volume heat capacity CV , and second￾order baryon susceptibility χ B 2 . The pronounced mini￾mum of c 2 s near the crossover… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Temperature dependence of equilibrium thermodynamic quantities at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Equilibrium thermodynamic observables along fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. CEP temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Allowed freeze-out ranges of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Collision-energy dependence of fluctuation ratios: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 59 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks,

    S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, A. Jakovac, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, “The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks,”JHEP11 (2010) 077,arXiv:1007.2580 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors,

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, and K. K. Szabo, “Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors,”Phys. Lett. B730 (2014) 99–104,arXiv:1309.5258 [hep-lat]. [3]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD,”Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094503,arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [4]

    Simulating QCD at finite density,

    P. de Forcrand, “Simulating QCD at finite density,” PoSLA T2009(2009) 010,arXiv:1005.0539 [hep-lat]. 5 EMsD HRG HRG 5 10 50 10060 82 104 126 148 170 0 100 200 300 400 500 SNN[GeV] T [MeV] μB [MeV] EMsD HRG 5 10 50 1000 20 40 60 80 100 120 SNN [GeV] μS [MeV] EMsD HRG 5 10 50 1000 5 10 15 20 SNN [GeV] -μQ [MeV] FIG. 4. Allowed freeze-out ranges ofTandµ B (l...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  4. [5]

    Conserved number fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas model,

    P. Garg, D. K. Mishra, P. K. Netrakanti, B. Mohanty, A. K. Mohanty, B. K. Singh, and N. Xu, “Conserved number fluctuations in a hadron resonance gas model,” Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 691–696,arXiv:1304.7133 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [6]

    Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview,

    X. Luo and N. Xu, “Search for the QCD Critical Point with Fluctuations of Conserved Quantities in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at RHIC : An Overview,”Nucl. Sci. Tech.28no. 8, (2017) 112, arXiv:1701.02105 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [7]

    The Horn, the hadron mass spectrum and the QCD phase diagram: The Statistical model of hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions,

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, and J. Stachel, “The Horn, the hadron mass spectrum and the QCD phase diagram: The Statistical model of hadron production in central nucleus-nucleus collisions,”Nucl. Phys. A834 (2010) 237C–240C,arXiv:0911.4931 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [8]

    Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,

    A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, “Decoding the phase structure of QCD via particle production at high energy,”Nature561 no. 7723, (2018) 321–330,arXiv:1710.09425 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [9]

    The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,

    S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,”Rev. Mod. Phys.64(1992) 649–708

    1992

  9. [10]

    Deconfinement and chiral restoration in hot and dense matter,

    K. Fukushima, “Deconfinement and chiral restoration in hot and dense matter,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.140 (2005) 580–582,arXiv:hep-lat/0409050

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [11]

    Chiral Restoration at Finite Density and Temperature,

    M. Asakawa and K. Yazaki, “Chiral Restoration at Finite Density and Temperature,”Nucl. Phys. A504 (1989) 668–684

    1989

  11. [12]

    The Phase diagram and bulk thermodynamical quantities in the NJL model at finite temperature and density,

    T. M. Schwarz, S. P. Klevansky, and G. Papp, “The Phase diagram and bulk thermodynamical quantities in the NJL model at finite temperature and density,” Phys. Rev. C60(1999) 055205, arXiv:nucl-th/9903048

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [13]

    The kurtosis of net baryon number fluctuations from a realistic Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model along the experimental freeze-out line,

    Z. Li, K. Xu, X. Wang, and M. Huang, “The kurtosis of net baryon number fluctuations from a realistic Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model along the experimental freeze-out line,”Eur. Phys. J. C79no. 3, (2019) 245,arXiv:1801.09215 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [14]

    Density effect on hadronization of a quark plasma,

    P. Zhuang, M. Huang, and Z. Yang, “Density effect on hadronization of a quark plasma,”Phys. Rev. C62 (2000) 054901,arXiv:nucl-th/0008043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  14. [15]

    Quark number fluctuations at finite temperature and finite chemical potential via the Dyson-Schwinger equation approach,

    X.-y. Xin, S.-x. Qin, and Y.-x. Liu, “Quark number fluctuations at finite temperature and finite chemical potential via the Dyson-Schwinger equation approach,” Phys. Rev. D90no. 7, (2014) 076006, arXiv:2109.09935 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [16]

    QCD phase transitions via a refined truncation of Dyson-Schwinger equations,

    F. Gao and Y.-x. Liu, “QCD phase transitions via a refined truncation of Dyson-Schwinger equations,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 7, (2016) 076009, arXiv:1607.01675 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [17]

    Phase diagram and critical endpoint for strongly-interacting quarks,

    S.-x. Qin, L. Chang, H. Chen, Y.-x. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, “Phase diagram and critical endpoint for strongly-interacting quarks,”Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 172301,arXiv:1011.2876 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [18]

    Locate QCD Critical End Point in a Continuum Model Study,

    C. Shi, Y.-L. Wang, Y. Jiang, Z.-F. Cui, and H.-S. Zong, “Locate QCD Critical End Point in a Continuum Model Study,”JHEP07(2014) 014,arXiv:1403.3797 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [19]

    Phase 6 structure of three and four flavor QCD,

    C. S. Fischer, J. Luecker, and C. A. Welzbacher, “Phase 6 structure of three and four flavor QCD,”Phys. Rev. D 90no. 3, (2014) 034022,arXiv:1405.4762 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [20]

    QCD phase structure from functional methods,

    F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, “QCD phase structure from functional methods,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 3, (2020) 034027,arXiv:2002.07500 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [21]

    QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density,

    W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, “QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 5, (2020) 054032, arXiv:1909.02991 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  21. [22]

    Functional renormalization group study of the quark-meson model withωmeson,

    H. Zhang, D. Hou, T. Kojo, and B. Qin, “Functional renormalization group study of the quark-meson model withωmeson,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 11, (2017) 114029, arXiv:1709.05654 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [23]

    Hyper-order baryon number fluctuations at finite temperature and density,

    W.-j. Fu, X. Luo, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, R. Wen, and S. Yin, “Hyper-order baryon number fluctuations at finite temperature and density,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 9, (2021) 094047,arXiv:2101.06035 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  23. [24]

    QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview,

    W.-j. Fu, “QCD at finite temperature and density within the fRG approach: an overview,”Commun. Theor. Phys.74no. 9, (2022) 097304, arXiv:2205.00468 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  24. [25]

    A holographic critical point,

    O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser, and C. Rosen, “A holographic critical point,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 086005,arXiv:1012.1864 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [26]

    A hQCD model and its phase diagram in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton system,

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, and D. Li, “A hQCD model and its phase diagram in Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton system,” JHEP03(2012) 033,arXiv:1201.0820 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [27]

    Some aspects of QGP phase in a hQCD model,

    R.-G. Cai, S. Chakrabortty, S. He, and L. Li, “Some aspects of QGP phase in a hQCD model,”JHEP02 (2013) 068,arXiv:1209.4512 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [28]

    Holographic calculation of the electric conductivity of the strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma near the deconfinement transition,

    S. I. Finazzo and J. Noronha, “Holographic calculation of the electric conductivity of the strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma near the deconfinement transition,” Phys. Rev. D89no. 10, (2014) 106008, arXiv:1311.6675 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [29]

    Locating the QCD critical end point through the peaked baryon number susceptibilities along the freeze-out line,

    Z. Li, Y. Chen, D. Li, and M. Huang, “Locating the QCD critical end point through the peaked baryon number susceptibilities along the freeze-out line,”Chin. Phys. C42no. 1, (2018) 013103,arXiv:1706.02238 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [30]

    Gravitation waves from QCD and electroweak phase transitions,

    Y. Chen, M. Huang, and Q.-S. Yan, “Gravitation waves from QCD and electroweak phase transitions,”JHEP 05(2018) 178,arXiv:1712.03470 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [31]

    Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics,

    J. Knaute, R. Yaresko, and B. K¨ ampfer, “Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics,”Phys. Lett. B778 (2018) 419–425,arXiv:1702.06731 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [32]

    Analytic Study on Chiral Phase Transition in Holographic QCD,

    M.-W. Li, Y. Yang, and P.-H. Yuan, “Analytic Study on Chiral Phase Transition in Holographic QCD,” JHEP02(2021) 055,arXiv:2009.05694 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  32. [33]

    Hot and dense quark-gluon plasma thermodynamics from holographic black holes,

    J. Grefa, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, “Hot and dense quark-gluon plasma thermodynamics from holographic black holes,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 3, (2021) 034002, arXiv:2102.12042 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [34]

    Gravitational waves and primordial black hole productions from gluodynamics by holography,

    S. He, L. Li, Z. Li, and S.-J. Wang, “Gravitational waves and primordial black hole productions from gluodynamics by holography,”Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.67no. 4, (2024) 240411,arXiv:2210.14094 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    Machine learning holographic black hole from lattice QCD equation of state,

    X. Chen and M. Huang, “Machine learning holographic black hole from lattice QCD equation of state,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 5, (2024) L051902,arXiv:2401.06417 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [36]

    Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li, and Y.-X. Wang, “Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) L121902,arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [37]

    Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective,

    M. Hippert, J. Grefa, T. A. Manning, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo Vazquez, C. Ratti, R. Rougemont, and M. Trujillo, “Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 9, (2024) 094006, arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    Neural network modeling of heavy-quark potential from holography,

    O.-Y. Luo, X. Chen, F.-P. Li, X.-H. Li, and K. Zhou, “Neural network modeling of heavy-quark potential from holography,”Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 6, (2025) 637, arXiv:2408.03784 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    Bayesian Inference of the Critical Endpoint in 2+1-Flavor System from Holographic QCD,

    L. Zhu, X. Chen, K. Zhou, H. Zhang, and M. Huang, “Bayesian Inference of the Critical Endpoint in 2+1-Flavor System from Holographic QCD,” arXiv:2501.17763 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [40]

    High-precise determination of critical exponents in holographic QCD,

    F. Sun, X. Chen, S. Li, and A. Watanabe, “High-precise determination of critical exponents in holographic QCD,”arXiv:2503.17642 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [41]

    Susceptibilities near the QCD (tri)critical point,

    B.-J. Schaefer and J. Wambach, “Susceptibilities near the QCD (tri)critical point,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 085015,arXiv:hep-ph/0603256

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [42]

    Third moments of conserved charges as probes of QCD phase structure,

    M. Asakawa, S. Ejiri, and M. Kitazawa, “Third moments of conserved charges as probes of QCD phase structure,”Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 262301, arXiv:0904.2089 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [43]

    QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models,

    B. J. Schaefer and M. Wagner, “QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 034027,arXiv:1111.6871 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [44]

    Mapping the QCD phase diagram with susceptibilities of conserved charges within Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,

    W. Fan, X. Luo, and H.-S. Zong, “Mapping the QCD phase diagram with susceptibilities of conserved charges within Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32no. 11, (2017) 1750061,arXiv:1608.07903 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [45]

    Susceptibilities from a black hole engineered EoS with a critical point,

    I. Portillo, “Susceptibilities from a black hole engineered EoS with a critical point,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser.832 no. 1, (2017) 012041,arXiv:1610.09981 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [46]

    Probing the QCD phase structure with higher order baryon number susceptibilities within the NJL model,

    W. Fan, X. Luo, and H. Zong, “Probing the QCD phase structure with higher order baryon number susceptibilities within the NJL model,”Chin. Phys. C 43no. 3, (2019) 033103,arXiv:1702.08674 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [47]

    Nonextensive effects on QCD chiral phase diagram and baryon-number fluctuations within Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model*,

    Y.-P. Zhao, C.-Y. Wang, S.-Y. Zuo, and C.-M. Li, “Nonextensive effects on QCD chiral phase diagram and baryon-number fluctuations within Polyakov-Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model*,”Chin. Phys. C 47no. 5, (2023) 053103,arXiv:2302.12010 [hep-ph]. [48]ST ARCollaboration, L. Adamczyket al., “Bulk Properties of the Medium Produced in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  47. [49]

    Baryon susceptibilities from a holographic equation of state,

    I. Portillo, “Baryon susceptibilities from a holographic equation of state,”Nucl. Phys. A967(2017) 916–919, arXiv:1705.01021 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [50]

    Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction,

    X. Wang, M. Wei, Z. Li, and M. Huang, “Quark matter under rotation in the NJL model with vector interaction,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 1, (2019) 016018, arXiv:1808.01931 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [51]

    QCD Matter and Phase Transitions under Extreme Conditions,

    M. Huang and P. Zhuang, “QCD Matter and Phase Transitions under Extreme Conditions,”Symmetry15 no. 2, (2023) 541. 7

    2023

  50. [52]

    On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point,

    M. A. Stephanov, “On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point,”Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 052301,arXiv:1104.1627 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [53]

    Cluster Expansion Model for QCD Baryon Number Fluctuations: No Phase Transition at µB/T < π,

    V. Vovchenko, J. Steinheimer, O. Philipsen, and H. Stoecker, “Cluster Expansion Model for QCD Baryon Number Fluctuations: No Phase Transition at µB/T < π,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 11, (2018) 114030, arXiv:1711.01261 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [54]

    QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations,

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, “QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations,”Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 5, (2020) 052001,arXiv:2002.02821 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [55]

    Skewness, kurtosis, and the fifth and sixth order cumulants of net baryon-number distributions from lattice QCD confront high-statistics STAR data,

    A. Bazavovet al., “Skewness, kurtosis, and the fifth and sixth order cumulants of net baryon-number distributions from lattice QCD confront high-statistics STAR data,”Phys. Rev. D101no. 7, (2020) 074502, arXiv:2001.08530 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  54. [56]

    Lattice QCD equation of state at finite chemical potential from an alternative expansion scheme,

    S. Bors´ anyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. P´ asztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szab´ o, “Lattice QCD equation of state at finite chemical potential from an alternative expansion scheme,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 23, (2021) 232001, arXiv:2102.06660 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [57]

    Equation of state and speed of sound of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strangeness-neutral matter at non-vanishing net baryon-number density,

    D. Bollweg, D. A. Clarke, J. Goswami, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, “Equation of state and speed of sound of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strangeness-neutral matter at non-vanishing net baryon-number density,” arXiv:2212.09043 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [58]

    Lattice Constraints on the QCD Chiral Phase Transition at Finite Temperature and Baryon Density,

    O. Philipsen, “Lattice Constraints on the QCD Chiral Phase Transition at Finite Temperature and Baryon Density,”Symmetry13no. 11, (2021) 2079, arXiv:2111.03590 [hep-lat]. [59]ST ARCollaboration, “Precision Measurement of (Net-)proton Number Fluctuations in Au+Au Collisions at RHIC,”arXiv:2504.00817 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [60]

    Phase transition of hot dense QCD Matter from a refined holographic EMD model,

    Z. Li and F. Wang, “Phase transition of hot dense QCD Matter from a refined holographic EMD model,” arXiv:2507.09113 [hep-ph]. [61]HotQCDCollaboration, A. Bazavovet al., “Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness: A comparison of lattice QCD results with the hadron resonance gas model,”Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 034509...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [62]

    The QCD Equation of State to O(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD,

    A. Bazavovet al., “The QCD Equation of State to O(µ6 B) from Lattice QCD,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 5, (2017) 054504,arXiv:1701.04325 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [63]

    Resummed lattice QCD equation of state at finite baryon density: Strangeness neutrality and beyond,

    S. Borsanyi, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, Z. Fodor, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, “Resummed lattice QCD equation of state at finite baryon density: Strangeness neutrality and beyond,” Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 114504, arXiv:2202.05574 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [64]

    Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,

    S. A. Basset al., “Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.41(1998) 255–369,arXiv:nucl-th/9803035

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  61. [65]

    Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,

    M. Bleicheret al., “Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultrarelativistic quantum molecular dynamics model,”J. Phys. G25(1999) 1859–1896, arXiv:hep-ph/9909407

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  62. [66]

    Strangeness-correlations on the pseudocritical line in (2+1)-flavor QCD,

    D. Bollweg, H. T. Ding, J. Goswami, F. Karsch, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, and C. Schmidt, “Strangeness-correlations on the pseudocritical line in (2+1)-flavor QCD,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 5, (2024) 054519,arXiv:2407.09335 [hep-lat]. [67]ST ARCollaboration, J. Th¨ ader, “Higher Moments of Net-Particle Multiplicity Distributions,”Nucl. Phys. A 956(2016) 320–323...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024