Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 65 references

This paper proposes a formally exact variational scheme in which the instantaneous one-body current and the global interparticle distance flux of an overdamped Brownian fluid are jointly selected by minimizing a free power functional.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:56 UTC pith:7PE664QQ

load-bearing objection The distance-current framework is new and worth discussing, but the central variational principle fails on the ideal gas with a uniform external force. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19255 v1 pith:7PE664QQ submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Entropy power functional theory for Brownian many-body dynamics

Matthias Schmidt This is my paper
classification cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords power functional theoryBrownian dynamicsvariational principleentropy functionalsuperadiabatic forcesnonequilibrium statistical mechanicsdistance distributionoverdamped dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that the full nonequilibrium dynamics of a pairwise-interacting Brownian fluid can be obtained from a single variational principle: at each instant, the one-body current and a global 'distance flux' (how pair separations change) are the minimizers of a free power functional. This extends the equilibrium variational idea of density functional theory into nonequilibrium, splitting the free power into an explicit energetic part and an entropic part that contains all correlations. If correct, it gives a formally exact route to compute currents and forces in nonequilibrium soft matter without solving the many-body Smoluchowski equation. The central novelty is a paired set of continuity equations for the density and for the pair-distance distribution, which close the dynamics together with the minimization conditions.

Core claim

The paper establishes a joint free power minimization principle for overdamped Brownian dynamics. The intrinsic free power is decomposed into ideal dissipation, ideal free-energy rate, adiabatic entropy rate (the time derivative of an equilibrium entropy metadensity functional), and a genuine nonequilibrium 'superpower' functional. The Euler–Lagrange conditions yield two coupled force-balance equations of motion, one for the position current and one for the distance current. Strikingly, the pair potential enters only the distance equation, while the external force enters only the position equation. Two continuity equations—for density and for pair distance—close the description. The paper sh

What carries the argument

The central object is the extended free power functional R_t[ρ, G, J, J_G] = W_t^int − X_t^int − X_t^ext, where W_t^int = P_t^id + Ḟ_t^id − T(Ṡ_t^exc + Σ_t^exc). The ideal dissipation P_t^id = P_t^id,1 + P_t^id,2 is split into a pure distance term and a coupling term that links position and distance currents through the ideal velocity functionals v_ρ^id and v_G^id. Minimizing with respect to J and J_G yields the equations of motion (41)–(42), which together with the continuity equations (6)–(7) formally determine the dynamics. This machinery converts the variational principle into explicit force-balance equations and separates energetic from entropic contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ideal dissipation functional has the specific split form P_id = P_id,1 + P_id,2 with no standalone γ∫J²/(2ρ) term; if that form is wrong, the position equation of motion cannot balance a uniform external force in a homogeneous fluid and the variational principle fails.

What would settle it

Consider a homogeneous Brownian fluid subject to a uniform external force. The theory's equation of motion (41) predicts zero one-body current because the ideal velocity functional v_ρ^id vanishes by angular symmetry, whereas the exact Smoluchowski solution gives a uniform drift current J = ρ f_ext/γ. A direct simulation or exact solution showing this drift current would falsify the variational principle as stated.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, the full dynamics of Brownian fluids is exactly variational, leaving only the superpower functional and adiabatic entropy functional as unknown objects to approximate.
  • The clean splitting into energetic and entropic rates means pair interactions appear only in the distance equation, which could guide new approximations for the superpower functional.
  • The continuity equation for the pair-distance distribution introduces a new observable that can be measured in simulations and experiments, linking to time-dependent pair correlations.
  • The theory provides a systematic basis for machine-learning the superpower functional from data, similar to recent functional-learning approaches in related contexts.
  • The adiabatic entropy rate being a time derivative of an equilibrium functional ties nonequilibrium dynamics directly to equilibrium density functional concepts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proposed ideal dissipation P_t^id contains no standalone γ∫J²/(2ρ) term; for a homogeneous density the functional derivative with respect to J vanishes by angular symmetry, so under a uniform external force the position equation cannot balance, and the variational free power may be unbounded below in J—suggesting the minimization principle as stated might not select the physical drift current.
  • The consistency check only verifies that the ideal-gas diffusive solution satisfies the equations of motion, not that the minimization selects it; a genuine validation would require examining the second variation or solving a nontrivial test case.
  • The distance flux J_G may be directly interpretable as the rate of change of the pair correlation function, hinting at a connection to time-dependent two-body statistics and dynamic test-particle routes.
  • Because the superpower functional is independent of the pair potential, it could be a universal nonequilibrium object, potentially transferable across different interaction potentials—a testable hypothesis for future numerical work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an extended power functional theory for overdamped Brownian dynamics. The free power functional R_t[ρ,G,J,J_G] is minimized instantaneously with respect to the one-body current J and the global distance current J_G (Eqs. (11)–(12)), yielding the force balance equations (41)–(42) which, together with the continuity equations (6)–(7), are claimed to determine the full dynamics. The intrinsic free power is decomposed into an ideal dissipation functional, an ideal free-energy rate, an adiabatic excess entropy rate, and a genuine nonequilibrium 'superpower' functional. The authors claim formally exact variational dynamics for general pairwise interacting Brownian systems.

Significance. The conceptual idea of extending power functional theory by a global distance distribution and its current is potentially interesting and would, if correct, provide a new route to treat pair correlations in nonequilibrium Brownian systems. The manuscript avoids fitted parameters and includes a consistency check, which is commendable. However, the central variational principle is invalidated by the paper's own equations in the simplest nontrivial limit: the ideal dissipation functional omits the standard quadratic one-body current term, so the Euler–Lagrange equation cannot balance a uniform external force on a homogeneous ideal gas and the free power is unbounded below. The additional reliance on unpublished preprints for the excess entropy metadensity functional and the completely unspecified superpower functional further prevent verification of the claimed exactness. As submitted, the central claim is not supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Intrinsic free power, Eqs. (16)–(21), (24)–(25), (41)] The extended ideal dissipation functional is defined as P_id = P_id,1 + P_id,2, with no standalone γ∫J²/(2ρ) term, even though the standard form is recalled one paragraph earlier. Consequently, δP_id/δJ = −γ v_id_ρ (Eq. (25)), and for homogeneous density ρ0 the angular integral in v_id_ρ (Eq. (24)) vanishes identically. For an ideal gas (ϕ=0, S_exc=Σ_exc=0) at constant density in a uniform external force F, Eq. (41) reduces to 0 = F. The exact Smoluchowski solution J = ρ0 F/γ satisfies the continuity equation but not Eq. (41) unless F=0. This directly contradicts the claimed formal exactness of the variational scheme.
  2. [Intrinsic free power, Eqs. (8), (16)–(21)] Because P_id lacks the quadratic term in J, R_t for the homogeneous ideal gas under a uniform force is linear in J (all other contributions vanish or are independent of J). There is therefore no minimum; R_t is unbounded below along the direction of the force. The minimization in Eq. (11) is not a well-posed variational problem. The consistency check in the 'Consistency check' paragraph only treats free diffusion (f_ext=0), where the stationarity equation happens to be satisfied by the diffusive solution; it does not test the minimization principle or the finite-force case. Thus the check does not substantiate the claim that the dynamics is selected by minimization.
  3. [Intrinsic free power, Eqs. (15), (29)–(31), (37)–(38), refs. [54,55]] The adiabatic excess entropy rate S_dot_exc[ρ,G] is imported from the author's unpublished preprints [54,55], and the superpower functional Σ_exc[ρ,G,J,J_G] is left completely unspecified. No explicit form, existence proof, or approximation is provided for either functional. As a result, Eqs. (41)–(42) are not a closed set of equations, and the assertion that they 'determine formally the dynamics' is unverifiable. This is a load-bearing gap, particularly because the claimed exactness is the central result of the paper. The manuscript should state the status of these functionals and provide a concrete construction or at least a well-defined path to one.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (15) and surrounding text] In the sentence preceding Eq. (15), the functional is written as W_int_t[ρ,G,J,W]; the fourth argument should be J_G, not W.
  2. [Consistency check paragraph] The text says 'as follows from the equation of motion (41)' when arguing that J_G = J_id_G for the free ideal gas. The statement follows from Eq. (42), not Eq. (41).
  3. [Title and header] The manuscript header lists 'Dated: 21 July 2025' while the arXiv line gives '21 Jul 2026'. Also, several references carry future arXiv numbers (e.g., refs. [22], [54], [55]). These inconsistencies should be fixed.
  4. [Eq. (24)] The notation v_id_ρ is potentially confusing because it is not the ideal one-body velocity J/ρ. A clarifying remark about the physical interpretation of v_id_ρ and its relation to the actual velocity field would help the reader.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Formal exactness rests on self-cited adiabatic entropy functional; distance flux is a consistency check, not a prediction.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 'Intrinsic free power', Eq. (15) and following paragraph; abstract.]
    "All 'adiabatic' correlation effects are contained in the time derivative of the equilibrium excess entropy metadensity functional, \dot{S}_t^{exc}[\rho,G], which is in general nonlocal [54,55] and instantaneous in time. ... The many-body problem is encapsulated in the adiabatic entropy metadensity functional S^{exc}[\rho,G] and in the entropic superpower functional \Sigma_t^{exc}[\rho,G,J,J_G]."

    The central exactness claim is not derived in the present paper; the adiabatic entropy rate is taken from the author's own preprints [54,55]. The equations of motion (41)-(42) are only closed if S_exc and Sigma_exc exist and are exact, but no proof or independent check is provided here. The load-bearing premise thus reduces to a self-citation chain rather than to a derivation contained in this work.

full rationale

The paper's functional-algebra derivation of Eqs. (41)-(42) from the free-power decomposition (15) is explicit, and no fitted parameters are renamed as predictions. The ideal-gas distance equation merely enforces J_G = J_id_G, but this is presented as a consistency check, not as an independent result. The main risk is not circularity but a mathematical flaw: P_id lacks the standard γ∫J²/(2ρ) term, so for constant density and a uniform external force Eq. (41) reduces to 0 = F (and R_t is unbounded below in J), which would falsify the claimed exact variational principle if confirmed. Because this is a correctness issue rather than an equivalence-to-inputs, it does not raise the circularity score beyond the load-bearing self-citation. Score 4 reflects the central reliance on the author's own unpublished entropy functional.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 4 invented entities

No fitted numerical parameters appear. The theory rests on newly introduced fields and on unproven functional entities. The most consequential assumption is the specific form of P_id, which is mathematically untenable for homogeneous states because it removes the restoring force for the one-body current.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The free power functional R_t is differentiable and the joint minimization principle (Eqs. 11–12) is exact.
    Postulated without proof. There is no demonstration that the functional exists, is convex, or that the Euler–Lagrange equations select the physical currents.
  • ad hoc to paper The intrinsic free power splits as W_int = P_id + ˙F_id - T(˙S_exc + Σ_exc) with S_exc and Σ_exc universal functionals independent of the pair potential.
    This is the core structural assumption. No closed form or existence proof for Σ_exc is given; S_exc is imported from the author's own preprints [54,55].
  • ad hoc to paper The ideal dissipation functional is P_id = P_id,1 + P_id,2 as in Eqs. (16)–(21).
    This form drops the standard γ∫J²/(2ρ) term. It is this specific assumption that makes the variational principle ill-posed for homogeneous systems.
  • domain assumption The equilibrium entropy metadensity functional S_exc[ρ,G] exists and its time derivative gives the adiabatic entropy rate.
    Taken from refs [54,55] by the same author; not independently verified in this paper.
  • standard math The continuity equations (6) and (7) close the dynamics.
    Follows exactly from the microscopic definitions of the density and distance histogram operators.
invented entities (4)
  • Global interparticle distance distribution G(r,t) independent evidence
    purpose: Additional variational field capturing pair distance statistics
    Defined as the ensemble average of the microscopic histogram operator (Eq. 3); in principle measurable in particle-resolved simulations.
  • Global distance current JG(r,t) independent evidence
    purpose: Conjugate current for G(r,t) in the variational principle
    Defined via particle velocities in Eq. (5); measurable in simulations.
  • Entropy metadensity functional S_exc[ρ,G] no independent evidence
    purpose: Adiabatic excess entropy contribution to the free power
    No explicit form is given; its existence is imported from the author's own unpublished preprints [54,55].
  • Entropy superpower functional Σ_exc[ρ,G,J,JG] no independent evidence
    purpose: Genuine nonequilibrium excess entropy rate, containing all superadiabatic effects
    Left completely unspecified. It is a placeholder for the unknown nonequilibrium part, with no proof of existence or uniqueness.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 9996 in / 20432 out tokens · 200320 ms · 2026-08-01T12:56:52.957999+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a formally exact variational scheme for the overdamped Brownian dynamics of pairwise interacting many-body systems in general spatiotemporal nonequilibrium. A joint free power minimization principle determines instantaneously the one-body current and the global interparticle distance flux. The intrinsic free power functional splits into entropic and energetic rates, where the latter are treated explicitly. The adiabatic contribution to the entropy rate is the time derivative of the equilibrium entropy metadensity functional. Genuine nonequilibrium effects originate from a universal entropy superpower functional. Two continuity equations close the dynamical description.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Schmidt, Power functional theory for many-body dy- namics, Rev

    M. Schmidt, Power functional theory for many-body dy- namics, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 015007 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    J. M. Brader and M. Schmidt, Power functional theory for the dynamic test particle limit, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 194106 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    L. L. Treffenst¨ adt and M. Schmidt, Universality in driven and equilibrium hard sphere liquid dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 058002 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    L. L. Treffenst¨ adt, T. Schindler, M. Schmidt, Dynamic decay and superadiabatic forces in the van Hove dynam- ics of bulk hard sphere fluids, SciPost Phys.12, 133 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    J. M. Brader and M. Schmidt, Dynamic correlations in Brownian many-body systems, J. Chem. Phys.140, 034104 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    J. M. Brader and M. Schmidt, Nonequilibrium Ornstein- Zernike relation for Brownian many-body dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.139, 104108 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Schmidt and J

    M. Schmidt and J. M. Brader, Power functional the- ory for Brownian dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.138, 214101 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    Schmidt, Power functional theory for Newtonian many-body dynamics, J

    M. Schmidt, Power functional theory for Newtonian many-body dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.148, 044502 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Schmidt, Quantum power functional theory for many- body dynamics, J

    M. Schmidt, Quantum power functional theory for many- body dynamics, J. Chem. Phys.143, 174108 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    J. P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald,Theory of Simple Liq- uids, 4th ed. (Academic Press, London, 2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    Evans, The nature of the liquid-vapour interface and other topics in the statistical mechanics of non-uniform, classical fluids, Adv

    R. Evans, The nature of the liquid-vapour interface and other topics in the statistical mechanics of non-uniform, classical fluids, Adv. Phys.28, 143 (1979)

    1979

  12. [12]

    Evans, Density functionals in the theory of nonuni- form fluids, Chap

    R. Evans, Density functionals in the theory of nonuni- form fluids, Chap. 3 inFundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids, edited by D. Henderson (Dekker, New York, 1992)

    1992

  13. [13]

    Evans, M

    R. Evans, M. Oettel, R. Roth, and G. Kahl, New devel- opments in classical density functional theory, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 240401 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Fortini, D

    A. Fortini, D. de las Heras, J. M. Brader, and M. Schmidt, Superadiabatic forces in Brownian many- body dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 167801 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Bernreuther and M

    E. Bernreuther and M. Schmidt, Superadiabatic forces in the dynamics of the one-dimensional Gaussian core model, Phys. Rev. E94, 022105 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    de las Heras and M

    D. de las Heras and M. Schmidt, Velocity gradient power functional for Brownian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 028001 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    N. C. X. Stuhlm¨ uller, T. Eckert, D. de las Heras, and M. Schmidt, Structural nonequilibrium forces in driven colloidal systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 098002 (2018)

    2018

  18. [18]

    de las Heras and M

    D. de las Heras and M. Schmidt, Flow and structure in nonequilibrium Brownian many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 018001 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    L. L. Treffenst¨ adt and M. Schmidt, Memory-induced mo- tion reversal in Brownian liquids, Soft Matter16, 1518 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Jahreis and M

    N. Jahreis and M. Schmidt, Shear-induced deconfinement of hard disks, Col. Pol. Sci.298, 895 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Geigenfeind, D

    T. Geigenfeind, D. de las Heras and M. Schmidt, Supera- diabatic demixing in nonequilibrium colloids, Commun. Phys.3, 23 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    K¨ oglmayr, F

    J. K¨ oglmayr, F. Samm¨ uller, and M. Schmidt, Nonequi- librium scaling of drag forces in counterdriven fluid mix- tures, arXiv:2605.31479. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Krinninger, M

    P. Krinninger, M. Schmidt, and J. M. Brader, Nonequi- librium phase behaviour from minimization of free power dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 208003 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Krinninger and M

    P. Krinninger and M. Schmidt, Power functional theory for active Brownian particles: general formulation and power sum rules, J. Chem. Phys.150, 074112 (2019)

    2019

  25. [25]

    Hermann and M

    S. Hermann and M. Schmidt, Active crystallization from power functional theory, Phys. Rev. E (Letter)109, L022601 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Hermann, D

    S. Hermann, D. de las Heras, and M. Schmidt, Non- negative interfacial tension in phase-separated active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 268002 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Hermann, D

    S. Hermann, D. de las Heras, and M. Schmidt, Phase sep- aration of active Brownian particles in two dimensions: Anything for a quiet life, Mol. Phys. e1902585 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Br¨ utting, T

    M. Br¨ utting, T. Trepl, D. de las Heras, and M. Schmidt, Superadiabatic forces via the acceleration gradient in quantum many-body dynamics, Molecules24, 3660 (2019)

    2019

  29. [29]

    Renner, M

    J. Renner, M. Schmidt, and D. de las Heras, Shear and bulk acceleration viscosities in simple fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 094502 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    N. D. Mermin, Thermal properties of the inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.137, A1441 (1965)

    1965

  31. [31]

    de las Heras, J

    D. de las Heras, J. Renner, and M. Schmidt, Custom flow in overdamped Brownian dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 99, 023306 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    Renner, M

    J. Renner, M. Schmidt, and D. de las Heras, Custom flow in molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. Research3, 013281 (2021)

    2021

  33. [33]

    de las Heras, T

    D. de las Heras, T. Zimmermann, F. Samm¨ uller, S. Her- mann, and M. Schmidt, Perspective: How to overcome dynamical density functional theory, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 271501 (2023); (Invited Perspective)

    2023

  34. [34]

    Zimmermann, F

    T. Zimmermann, F. Samm¨ uller, S. Hermann, M. Schmidt, and D. de las Heras, Neural force functional for non-equilibrium many-body colloidal systems, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.5, 035062 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Fleischmann, M

    P. Fleischmann, M. Schmidt, and F. Samm¨ uller, Power functional learning the physics of active bulk fluids (to be published)

  36. [36]

    Samm¨ uller, S

    F. Samm¨ uller, S. Hermann, D. de las Heras, and M. Schmidt, Neural functional theory for inhomogeneous flu- ids: Fundamentals and applications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120, e2312484120 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Dijkman, M

    J. Dijkman, M. Dijkstra, R. van Roij, M. Welling, J.- W. van de Meent, and B. Ensing, Learning neural free- energy functionals with pair-correlation matching, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 056103 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Samm¨ uller, M

    F. Samm¨ uller, M. Schmidt, and R. Evans, Neural density functional theory of liquid-gas phase coexistence, Phys. Rev. X15, 011013 (2025); Featured in Physics18, 17 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    A. T. Bui and S. J. Cox, Learning classical density func- tionals for ionic fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 148001 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    A. T. Bui and S. J. Cox, Dielectrocapillarity for exquisite control of fluids, Nat. Commmun.17, 2661 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    A. T. Bui and S. J. Cox, A unified machine learning framework for ab initio multiscale modeling of liquids, arXiv:2603.20493

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Samm¨ uller, S

    F. Samm¨ uller, S. Robitschko, S. Hermann, and M. Schmidt, Hyperdensity functional theory of soft matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 098201 (2024); PRL Editors’ Sug- gestion

    2024

  43. [43]

    S. M. Kampa, F. Samm¨ uller, M. Schmidt, and R. Evans, Metadensity functional theory for classical fluids: Ex- tracting the pair potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107301 (2025); PRL Editors’ Suggestion

    2025

  44. [44]

    S. M. Kampa, F. Samm¨ uller, and M. Schmidt, Metaden- sity functional learning for classical fluids: Regulariz- ing with pair correlations, J. Phys. Chem. B130, 6231 (2026). (Special issue:Classical density functional theory in physical chemistry)

    2026

  45. [45]

    S. M. Kampa, M. Schmidt, and F. Samm¨ uller, Spher- ical metadensity functional learning for inhomogeneous classical fluids, arXiv:2606.14370

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    U. M. B. Marconi and P. Tarazona, Dynamic density functional theory of fluids, J. Chem. Phys.110, 8032 (1999)

    1999

  47. [47]

    U. M. B. Marconi and S. Melchionna, Phase-space ap- proach to dynamical density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.126, 184109 (2007)

    2007

  48. [48]

    Schilling, Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium, Phys

    T. Schilling, Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium, Phys. Rep.972, 1 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr

    E. Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr. d. K¨ onig. Gesellsch. d. Wiss. zu G¨ ottingen, Math.-Phys. Klasse,235, 183 (1918). English translation by M. A. Tavel: Invariant variation problems. Transp. Theo. Stat. Phys.1, 186 (1971); for a version in modern typesetting see: Frank Y. Wang, arXiv:physics/0503066v3 (2018)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1918

  50. [50]

    Hermann and M

    S. Hermann and M. Schmidt, Noether’s theorem in sta- tistical mechanics, Commun. Phys.4, 176 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    M¨ uller, S

    J. M¨ uller, S. Hermann, F. Samm¨ uller, and M. Schmidt, Gauge invariance of equilibrium statistical mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 217101 (2024); Editors’ Sugges- tion; PRL’s Collection of the Year 2024; Featured in Physics17, 163 (2024) by B. Rotenberg

    2024

  52. [52]

    M¨ uller, F

    J. M¨ uller, F. Samm¨ uller, and M. Schmidt, Why gauge invariance applies to statistical mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.58, 125003 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    M¨ uller, F

    J. M¨ uller, F. Samm¨ uller, and M. Schmidt, Dy- namical gauge invariance of statistical mechanics, arXiv:2504.17599

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Schmidt, Entropy density functional theory for inho- mogeneous fluids, arXiv:2606.28240

    M. Schmidt, Entropy density functional theory for inho- mogeneous fluids, arXiv:2606.28240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Schmidt, Entropy density functional universality: Correlation, response, and entropic Ornstein-Zernike structure, arXiv:2607.03032

    M. Schmidt, Entropy density functional universality: Correlation, response, and entropic Ornstein-Zernike structure, arXiv:2607.03032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Zwanzig,Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    R. Zwanzig,Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 2001)

    2001

  57. [57]

    J. K. G. Dhont, An Introduction to the Dynamics of Colloids (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996)

    1996

  58. [58]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 126001 (2012)

    2012

  59. [59]

    Deg¨ unther, J

    J. Deg¨ unther, J. van der Meer, and U. Seifert, General theory for localizing the where and when of entropy pro- duction meets single-molecule experiments Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.120, e2405371121 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Meyberg, J

    E. Meyberg, J. Deg¨ unther, and U. Seifert, Entropy pro- duction from waiting-time distributions for overdamped Langevin dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.5725LT01 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Moncho-Jord´ a and J

    A. Moncho-Jord´ a and J. Dzubiella, Controlling the mi- crostructure and phase behavior of confined soft colloids by active interaction switching, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 078001 (2020). 7

    2020

  62. [62]

    A. P. Antonov, A. Ryabov, and P. Maass, Solitons in overdamped Brownian dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 080601 (2022)

    2022

  63. [63]

    Cereceda-L´ opez, A

    E. Cereceda-L´ opez, A. P. Antonov, A. Ryabov, P. Maass, and P. Tierno, Overcrowding induces fast colloidal soli- tons in a slowly rotating potential landscape Nat. Com- mun.14, 6448 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    A. P. Stikuts, S. Mishra, A. Ryabov, P. Maass, and P. Tierno, Engineering tunable fractional Shapiro steps in colloidal transport, Nat. Commun.16, 2966 (2025)

    2025

  65. [65]

    Mishra, A

    S. Mishra, A. Ryabov, and P. Maass, Phase locking and fractional Shapiro steps in collective dynamics of mi- croparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107102 (2025)

    2025