Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 49 references

A High-Order Flux Reconstruction Actuator-Line Framework for Rotating-Blade Aerodynamics on Fixed Cartesian Grids

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A high-order actuator-line framework predicts VAWT power within 6% of high-fidelity data.

desk verdict Worth a serious look for the wake validation and the kernel criterion, but treat the 6% CP claim as a DMST result until the solver is shown to produce its own induction. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20347 v1 pith:U5GS7NY6 submitted 2026-07-22 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Abdullah Al Imran , Meilin Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.comp-ph
keywords vertical-axiswindturbineactuatorlinemodelfluxreconstructionpowercoefficientdynamicstallwakepredictionGaussianforceprojectionDMSTinduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that a high-order flux reconstruction solver, coupled with a rotating actuator-line model, can simulate vertical-axis wind turbine aerodynamics on fixed Cartesian grids without resolving blade geometry. The central quantitative claim is that the predicted power-coefficient curve matches three-dimensional LES-ALM reference data to within 6% around the optimal tip-speed ratio. To achieve that on affordable coarse meshes, the authors add an explicit Double Multiple Streamtube induction correction, because the Gaussian-smeared blade forces on their production mesh produce negligible resolved-flow induction feedback. The framework also reproduces regime-dependent dynamic stall, lift hysteresis, and characteristic near- and far-wake structures. If correct, this offers a computationally cheap, geometry-free route for parametric studies and wind-farm-scale analysis.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the actuator-line source term: each blade is represented as a rotating point force, projected onto the fixed Cartesian grid through an isotropic Gaussian kernel of width ε = max(2h/p, c/κc), where h is mesh size, p the polynomial degree, c the chord, and κc=4.3. This kernel converts blade-element lift and drag into volumetric momentum and energy sources added to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations solved by the FR/CPR discretization (a high-order 'flux reconstruction/correction procedure via reconstruction' scheme). The angle of attack comes from the local velocity triangle in a four-quadrant formulation, with a modified Boeing-Vertol model adding rate-depe

What would settle it

Run the same FR/CPR-ALM case without DMST on a mesh fine enough for the kernel to be chord-controlled (h < cp/(2κc) ≈ 0.049 m for this geometry), sample the resolved velocity at the actuator point, and compute CP(λ). If the resulting curve deviates substantially from the DMST-corrected coarse curve, then the 6% agreement is not produced by the coupled solver. A complementary check: on the fine mesh, measure the induced velocity at the blade and compare it to the DMST values uu and ud; a large mismatch would indicate the correction is misrepresenting induction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a two-dimensional FR/CPR-ALM formulation with a single actuator point per blade, an isotropic Gaussian kernel for force projection, and a Boeing-Vertol dynamic-stall correction captures the essential physics of a straight-bladed vertical-axis turbine. The predicted power coefficient rises from 0.027 at λ=1.5 to a peak of 0.443 at λ=4.0, within 5.7% of the 3D LES-ALM peak, then declines to 0.229 at λ=7.0, and the agreement with the reference curve is within 6% over the operating window bracketing the optimum. The authors derive a mesh-resolution criterion h < cp/(2κc) for the Gaussian kernel and show that on the coarse production mesh the kernel

Load-bearing premise

The central performance claim rests on the assumption that on the coarse production mesh the Gaussian-smeared actuator force produces negligible resolved-flow induction feedback, so that an externally imposed DMST correction recovers the physical inflow; if the smearing over-softens the force or the correction double-counts induction, the reported power curve is essentially a DMST/BEMT result rather than a product of the coupled FR/CPR-ALM solver.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The power-coefficient curve CP(λ) matches 3D LES-ALM reference data within 6% around the optimal tip-speed ratios, with the peak within 5.7%.
  • The mean near-wake velocity profile agrees with experimental and LES-ALM measurements at x/D=1, reproducing the deficit magnitude and lateral asymmetry.
  • The Boeing-Vertol dynamic-stall correction is regime-dependent: +23% CP at λ=1.5, -10.7% at λ=3.5, +6.9% at λ=5.5.
  • A single 30-second simulation at λ=3.5 takes about 37 minutes on 48 CPU cores, making parametric tip-speed-ratio sweeps practical.
  • The derived kernel-resolution criterion h < cp/(2κc) tells when the Gaussian width is chord-controlled rather than mesh-controlled, providing a rule for other meshes and airfoils.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same coarse-mesh-plus-external-DMST recipe could in principle be carried over to horizontal-axis rotors or actuator-disk farm layouts, but the paper only demonstrates a two-dimensional VAWT, so that transfer is untested.
  • Editorial inference: because the DMST correction effectively prescribes the rotor's induction, the coupled solver's main role is transporting the wake; a natural test is to run a fully resolved, fine-mesh case with self-consistent induction feedback and compare the two power curves to quantify how much physics the correction is replacing.
  • Editorial inference: the 2D single-actuator-point-per-blade representation is spanwise-infinite; extending to 3D with multiple spanwise actuator elements would be needed to resolve tip vortices and spanwise load variation, which the paper notes as straightforward but does not simulate.
  • Editorial inference: the large low-λ overprediction (C_P=0.075 at λ=2.0 vs -0.05 reference) suggests the framework's quantitative utility is concentrated near the optimum, not in deep-stall performance, which matters for design loads.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a two-dimensional FR/CPR (flux reconstruction / correction procedure via reconstruction) solver coupled to a rotating actuator-line model (ALM) with isotropic Gaussian force projection for vertical-axis wind turbine (VAWT) aerodynamics on fixed Cartesian grids. A modified Boeing-Vertol dynamic stall correction is used, and a Double Multiple Streamtube (DMST) induction model is imposed when the resolved flow provides negligible induction feedback. The manuscript reports a near-wake validation against Bachant & Wosnik and Hezaveh et al., and a power-coefficient curve CP(λ) that agrees with 3D LES-ALM data to within about 6% near the optimal tip-speed ratio. It also documents azimuthal loading, lift hysteresis, wake structure, and computational cost. The main claim is that the FR/CPR-ALM framework is an accurate and efficient geometry-free tool for VAWT analysis.

Significance. The topic is timely and the paper is unusually candid about a key limitation: the manuscript itself states in Sec. III D 1 that direct sampling of the resolved velocity yields a power curve nearly coincident with the zero-induction result, and in Sec. III C that on the production mesh the Gaussian kernel is mesh-controlled, diluting induced velocity. This confirms the central concern that the reported CP(λ) curve is effectively a DMST/BEMT prediction using tabulated static polars and an empirical dynamic-stall correction, not a prediction produced by the coupled FR/CPR-ALM solution. The wake comparison at x/D=1 and λ=1.9 is a legitimate positive result with quantitative data, and the kernel-resolution criterion is useful for practitioners, but the wake validation alone does not support the headline 6% performance claim. The paper also compares against LES-ALM results that use the same actuator-line methodology and static polar source, so the performance comparison is not independent of the engineering model being implicitly tested. With a reframing of the claims and additional supporting analysis, the contribution could be a useful demonstration of high-order ALM wake simulation wi

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III D 1, III D 2 and III C] The central CP(λ) claim is not a direct product of the coupled FR/CPR-ALM solver. The manuscript states in Sec. III D 1 that direct sampling of the resolved velocity at the blade yields a power curve 'nearly coincident with the zero-induction result,' and Sec. III C shows that the production mesh operates in the mesh-controlled regime with ε=0.043 m, smearing the force over ~0.17 m. The DMST correction in Eqs. (43)-(44) then replaces the inflow velocity with U∞(1-au) or U∞(1-2au) in the force evaluation (Eq. (27)), while the resolved flow field is not decelerated to match this velocity. The momentum source in Eq. (39) is therefore evaluated with a blade-inflow velocity inconsistent with the resolved field it acts on. Consequently the 'within 6%' agreement with LES-ALM in Sec. III D 3 validates the DMST/BEMT model with Sheldahl-Klimas polars and the Boeing-Vertol correction, not the high-
  2. [Sec. III B, Fig. 5] The near-wake validation is a genuine positive result, but it is limited and not independent enough to carry the performance claim. The comparison is made only at λ=1.9, far below the optimal regime (λ≈4-4.5), and in the deep-stall regime where 2D simulations are known to behave poorly. The manuscript itself notes that the 2D formulation overpredicts the deficit depth relative to experiment and LES. The reference 'ALM-LES' of Hezaveh et al. shares the same actuator-line modeling approach and, like the present work, uses Sheldahl-Klimas static airfoil data, so the agreement partly reflects a common modeling base rather than an independent validation of the FR/CPR discretization. Quantified error measures (e.g., velocity-deficit error norms) and a comparison at a near-optimal tip-speed ratio would substantially strengthen the validation. As written, the wake result supports the claim that
  3. [Sec. III D 3, Table II] The 'within 6%' agreement is asserted only around the optimum, while the off-design behavior is much worse and is not discussed as a limitation. Table II shows that at λ=2.0 the present method gives ⟨CP⟩=0.075 while the 3D LES-ALM reference is −0.05, a discrepancy of order 0.125 in CP; at λ=1.5 the present value is 0.027 and the reference is not reported. Even near the optimum, the λ=4.5 point differs from the reference by approximately 6.6% (0.439 vs 0.47), slightly above the stated 6%. The selected range λ=3.5-5.5 brackets the peak and gives good agreement, but the paper should state precisely which points are included in the 'within 6%' claim and explicitly acknowledge the large low-λ discrepancies. Without this, the abstract's 'matches high-fidelity LES-ALM data to within 6%' is misleading as a global validation statement.
  4. [Sec. II B, Eqs. (38), (45)-(46)] The results depend on several user-set parameters for which no sensitivity study is reported: the chord-fraction constant κ_c=4.3 in Eq. (38), the kernel truncation radius r_c=4ε, the DMST under-relaxation factor 0.9/0.1 in Eq. (46), and the unspecified bypass threshold in Eq. (33) that removes the singularity as α*_L→α0. These parameters directly affect the smeared force distribution and the induction update, and therefore the reported CP and wake fields. In particular, κ_c controls whether the kernel is chord- or mesh-controlled, and the choice κ_c=4.3 is not justified beyond a single value. A parameter sensitivity study, or at least a statement of the threshold value and its influence on the dynamic-stall correction, is needed to establish that the headline results are robust rather than tuned.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] Typos: 'one of the most fastest-growing' should be 'one of the fastest-growing'; 'V AWTs' appears with inconsistent spacing in several places.
  2. [References] Reference 37 is listed as 'unpublished' and reference 33 is listed as a preprint 'submitted/accepted'; such references should be updated or marked as 'in preparation' with a DOI if available.
  3. [Fig. 7 and Fig. 8] The figure captions and axes would benefit from explicit labels for the static and Boeing-Vertol cases in the legend, and from stating the azimuthal averaging procedure in the caption or text.
  4. [Sec. III D 3] The phrase 'high-fidelity three-dimensional LES-ALM' is potentially misleading: the reference is an actuator-line LES, not a blade-resolved simulation. The text should say 'LES with an actuator-line model' to avoid implying geometric resolution of the blades.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The CP curve is effectively a DMST/BEMT result with externally imposed inflow; the FR/CPR resolved flow contributes negligible induction, so the 6% LES-ALM agreement is attributed to the wrong component.

  1. other [Sec. III D 1–2 and III D 3 (Eqs. 27, 40–46)]
    "However, we found that direct sampling of the resolved velocity field at the blade yields a power coefficient curve nearly coincident with the zero-induction result. ... Therefore, induction is modeled explicitly through DMST correction ... The effective inflow velocity in each half cycle is uu = U∞(1−au), ud = U∞(1−2au). ... Figure 6 presents the time-averaged power coefficient ... obtained with the DMST induction correction and the Boeing-Vertol dynamic stall model."

    In Eq. (27) the blade relative velocity uses uloc 'equal to uu or ud depending on the azimuthal half', i.e. the DMST-determined values, not the FR/CPR-resolved velocity. The paper states the resolved field supplies negligible induction feedback. Thus CL, CD, forces, torque and CP (Eqs. 33–41) are computed entirely from the external DMST/BEMT inflow plus static polars and the Boeing-Vertol correction; the solver only advects the prescribed body forces. Presenting the resulting CP comparison as validation of the FR/CPR-ALM framework renames the DMST input as a solver prediction: the claimed 'prediction' reduces by construction to the external induction model.

full rationale

The paper's wake comparison (Sec. III B) is a genuine, self-contained validation of the source-term coupling on fixed grids: the mean wake profile is compared with experiment and 3D LES-ALM, and the mesh study shows grid convergence. But the central performance claim is different. Sec. III D1 reports that direct sampling of the resolved velocity gives a CP curve nearly coincident with zero-induction, and Sec. III D2 replaces the blade-inflow velocity with DMST values. Consequently the power coefficient is a DMST/BEMT calculation with Sheldahl-Klimas polars and Boeing-Vertol hysteresis, not a prediction of the coupled FR/CPR-ALM solver. The 5.7% peak agreement with Shamsoddin and Porté-Agel therefore evidences the external engineering model, not the high-order solver's induction coupling. No additional circularity was found: the self-citations to prior FR/CPR source-term work are contextual rather than load-bearing, and the kernel-width criterion is a conventional resolution condition. The central claim should be stated as conditional on the DMST induction correction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are numerical/empirical constants (kernel chord fraction, under-relaxation) and an unspecified threshold. The main burden is the DMST correction and the assumption that resolved induction feedback is negligible, which transfers the performance prediction from the CFD to an engineering model.

free parameters (4)
  • kappa_c (chord-fraction constant in Gaussian width) = 4.3
    Set to 4.3 in all simulations; controls the chord floor of the kernel width (Eq. 38). Chosen by hand, not fitted to data, but affects force smearing and the mesh-controlled/chord-controlled regime.
  • Kernel truncation radius r_c = 4*epsilon
    Chosen for computational efficiency; a larger radius would change the effective force projection, though the isotropic Gaussian integrates to unity over the full plane, the truncation introduces a small normalization error.
  • Under-relaxation factors in DMST induction update = 0.9 / 0.1
    Eq. 46 uses 0.9*a_old + 0.1*a_target to suppress oscillations. This smoothing constant is hand-set and affects convergence of the induction factor.
  • Bypass threshold in dynamic-stall correction (Eq. 33) = not specified
    A small threshold on |alpha*_L - alpha_0| is used to avoid division by zero; the actual value is not given in the text, which reduces reproducibility of the dynamic-stall correction.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The two-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations with a perfect-gas closure govern the flow.
    Standard governing equations, invoked in Sec. II A.
  • domain assumption Each blade is modeled as a single spanwise-uniform actuator point in 2D.
    The ALM is 2D; three-dimensional spanwise effects are neglected, as discussed in Sec. II B and acknowledged in Sec. III G.
  • domain assumption Static airfoil polars from Sheldahl and Klimas (ref 17) are valid for the NACA 0018 section at the simulated Reynolds number and angle range.
    The blade forces use these tabulated lift/drag coefficients; if the polars are not representative, all force predictions inherit the error.
  • domain assumption The modified Boeing-Vertol dynamic-stall model (Eqs. 29–33) captures the unsteady lift and drag behavior.
    Empirical dynamic-stall model; its validity for VAWT operating conditions is assumed, not independently verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Double Multiple Streamtube (DMST) induction correction with Glauert's high-loading extension correctly recovers the physical inflow when resolved induction feedback is negligible.
    This is the load-bearing assumption for the CP prediction; the resolved flow field is explicitly bypassed in favor of the DMST model (Sec. III D).
  • domain assumption The Gaussian kernel representation of blade forces is adequate for capturing the rotor-induced momentum deficit and wake dynamics.
    Standard in ALM, but the kernel width and truncation affect the flow; the paper derives a resolution criterion but does not fully validate the kernel against blade-resolved data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A High-Order Flux Reconstruction Actuator-Line Framework for Rotating-Blade Aerodynamics on Fixed Cartesian Grids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U5GS7NY6

@misc{pith2026260720347,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A High-Order Flux Reconstruction Actuator-Line Framework for Rotating-Blade Aerodynamics on Fixed Cartesian Grids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U5GS7NY6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20347}
}
read the original abstract

This work couples a high-order flux reconstruction/correction procedure via reconstruction (FR/CPR) solver with a rotating actuator-line model (ALM) to simulate rotating-blade aerodynamics on fixed Cartesian grids. Blade loading is represented by volumetric body force source terms projected through an isotropic Gaussian kernel in a blade-attached frame, eliminating the need to resolve blade geometry. Vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) serve as the demonstration configuration, with a modified Boeing-Vertol dynamic stall model incorporated to capture unsteady lift and drag. A mesh-resolution criterion for the Gaussian projection kernel on reasonably coarse meshes is derived. It shows that cost-effective coarse meshes can operate in a mesh-controlled regime with negligible induction feedback, motivating a Double Multiple Streamtube (DMST) correction to recover the physical inflow. Simulations are carried out over a range of tip-speed ratios at a chord-based Reynolds number of Re_c ~ 3.6 x 10^5. The framework is validated against experimental near-wake measurements and previously reported LES-ALM results, and the mean wake profile shows good agreement. The predicted power-coefficient curve matches high-fidelity three-dimensional LES-ALM data to within 6% around the optimal VAWT operation conditions. The framework also captures the regime-dependent influence of dynamic stall, azimuthal blade loading, lift hysteresis, and characteristic wake structures. These results demonstrate that the FR/CPR-ALM framework provides an accurate and computationally efficient geometry-free approach for VAWT analysis, making it well suited for parametric studies and large-scale wind energy applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.20347 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the coordinate transformation between the physical domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Distribution of solution points (blue squares) and flux points (red circles) within a standard quadri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Velocity triangles and force decomposition for a rotating blade, drawn at one azimuthal position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Computational mesh with local refinement in the turbine region. The red circle of radius 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized mean streamwise velocity profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Power coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Phase-averaged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase-averaged tangential force [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Phase-averaged (a) angle of attack [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Normalized instantaneous streamwise velocity contours at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Normalized instantaneous spanwise vorticity contours at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Instantaneous actuator-line momentum source terms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Normalized time-averaged streamwise velocity contours for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Normalized Time-averaged spanwise vorticity contours for (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2026 , organization=

    Imran, Abdullah Al and Yu, Meilin , title =. 2026 , organization=

    2026

  2. [2]

    Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting , volume=

    A high-order computational framework for wind farm modeling using flux reconstruction and actuator disk models , author=. Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting , volume=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  3. [3]

    AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2025 , pages=

    Development and Validation of a Source-Term Based High-Order CFD Framework for Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Simulation , author=. AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2025 , pages=. 2025 , DOI=

    2025

  4. [4]

    2002 , publisher=

    Wind turbine design: with emphasis on Darrieus concept , author=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  5. [5]

    The phenomenon of dynamic stall , author=

  6. [6]

    A mathematical model of unsteady aerodynamics and radial flow for application to helicopter rotors , author=

  7. [7]

    2006 , publisher=

    Principles of helicopter aerodynamics with CD extra , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  8. [8]

    Journal of the American Helicopter society , volume=

    A Semi-Empirical model for dynamic stall , author=. Journal of the American Helicopter society , volume=. 1989 , publisher=

    1989

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology , volume=

    Simulating dynamic stall in a two-dimensional vertical-axis wind turbine: verification and validation with particle image velocimetry data , author=. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  2. [10]

    Energy Procedia , volume=

    2D CFD modeling of H-Darrieus wind turbines using a transition turbulence model , author=. Energy Procedia , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  3. [11]

    Renewable energy , volume=

    2.5 D large eddy simulation of vertical axis wind turbine in consideration of high angle of attack flow , author=. Renewable energy , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  4. [12]

    Renewable Energy , volume=

    Near wake flow analysis of a vertical axis wind turbine by stereoscopic particle image velocimetry , author=. Renewable Energy , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  5. [13]

    Numerical modeling of wind turbine wakes , author=. J. Fluids Eng. , volume=

  6. [14]

    Technical University of Denmark , author=

    Actuator disc methods applied to wind turbines. Technical University of Denmark , author=. 2003 , school=

    2003

  7. [15]

    Actuator line modeling of wind turbine wakes , author=

  8. [16]

    1981 , institution=

    Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines , author=. 1981 , institution=

    1981

  9. [17]

    Energies , volume=

    A large-eddy simulation study of vertical axis wind turbine wakes in the atmospheric boundary layer , author=. Energies , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  10. [18]

    Energy Conversion and Management , volume=

    Effectiveness of two-dimensional CFD simulations for Darrieus VAWTs: a combined numerical and experimental assessment , author=. Energy Conversion and Management , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  11. [19]

    Reynolds number dependence of cross-flow turbine performance and near-wake characteristics , author=

  12. [20]

    Energy Conversion and Management , volume=

    Tailoring the actuator line theory to the simulation of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines , author=. Energy Conversion and Management , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  13. [21]

    Wind Energy , volume=

    Simulation and wake analysis of a single vertical axis wind turbine , author=. Wind Energy , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  14. [22]

    Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting , volume=

    Performance and near-wake measurements for a vertical axis turbine at moderate Reynolds number , author=. Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting , volume=. 2013 , doi=

    2013

  15. [23]

    Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy , volume=

    Large-eddy simulation of helical-and straight-bladed vertical-axis wind turbines in boundary layer turbulence , author=. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  16. [24]

    Cockburn and C.-W

    B. Cockburn and C.-W. Shu. TVB Runge–Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: general framework. Mathematics of Computation. 1989. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2008474 , URL =

    1989 doi

  17. [25]

    Journal of computational physics , volume=

    A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier--Stokes equations , author=. Journal of computational physics , volume=. 1997 , publisher=. doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.5572 , url =

    1997

  18. [26]

    Hesthaven, J. S. and Warburton, T. , title=

  19. [27]

    18th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference , pages=

    A flux reconstruction approach to high-order schemes including discontinuous Galerkin methods , author=. 18th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference , pages=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  20. [28]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    A unifying lifting collocation penalty formulation including the discontinuous Galerkin, spectral volume/difference methods for conservation laws on mixed grids , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  21. [29]

    47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition , pages=

    A reconstruction approach to high-order schemnes including discontinuous Galerkin for diffusion , author=. 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition , pages=

  22. [30]

    Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=

    A new class of high-order energy stable flux reconstruction schemes , author=. Journal of Scientific Computing , volume=. 2011 , publisher=. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-010-9420-z , url=

    2011 doi

  23. [31]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=

    High-order CFD methods: current status and perspective , author=. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  24. [32]

    Handbook of numerical analysis , volume=

    High-order flux reconstruction schemes , author=. Handbook of numerical analysis , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  25. [33]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Spectral difference method for unstructured grids I: Basic formulation , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  26. [34]

    Journal of computational physics , volume=

    Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes , author=. Journal of computational physics , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

    1981

  27. [35]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09993 , year=

    Modelling Wind Turbines via Actuator Lines in High-Order h/p Solvers , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09993 , year=

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Journal of Fluids Engineering , volume=

    High-Order Large Eddy Simulations of a Wind Turbine in Ducted and Open-Rotor Configurations , author=. Journal of Fluids Engineering , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  29. [37]

    Discontinuous Galerkin methodology for Large-Eddy Simulation of wind turbine wakes , booktitle =

    Fr. Discontinuous Galerkin methodology for Large-Eddy Simulation of wind turbine wakes , booktitle =. 2016 , volume =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/753/2/022037 , url =

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    and Schlatter, P

    Kleusberg, E. and Schlatter, P. and Henningson, D. S. , title =. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , year =. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/854/1/012025 , url =

    doi

  31. [39]

    O'Dea, M. L. and others , title =. 2024 , note =

    2024

  32. [40]

    and others , title =

    Abedi, H. and others , title =. Engineering Proceedings , year =

  33. [41]

    M. L. Yu and Z. J. Wang and Y. Liu , journal =. On the accuracy and efficiency of discontinuous Galerkin, spectral difference and correction procedure via reconstruction methods , doi=

  34. [42]

    Wang and M

    L. Wang and M. L. Yu , journal =. Comparison of ROW, ESDIRK, and BDF2 for Unsteady Flows with the High-Order Flux Reconstruction Formulation , volume =. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  35. [43]

    SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , volume=

    Total-variation-diminishing time discretizations , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  36. [44]

    , title =

    Glauert, H. , title =. Aerodynamic Theory , volume =

  37. [45]

    and Cummins, P

    Garrett, C. and Cummins, P. , title =. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , volume =

  38. [46]

    and Yu, Meilin , title =

    Wisner, Kai S. and Yu, Meilin , title =. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy , volume =. 2024 , month =

    2024

  39. [47]

    Ting and Amir Fartaj , keywords =

    Mazharul Islam and David S.-K. Ting and Amir Fartaj , keywords =. Aerodynamic models for Darrieus-type straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines , journal =. 2008 , issn =

    2008

  40. [48]

    Enhancing wind energy harvesting performance of vertical axis wind turbines with a new hybrid design: A fluid-structure interaction study , journal =

    Kan Liu and Meilin Yu and Weidong Zhu , keywords =. Enhancing wind energy harvesting performance of vertical axis wind turbines with a new hybrid design: A fluid-structure interaction study , journal =. 2019 , issn =

    2019

  41. [49]

    2005 , author =

    Discontinuous Galerkin solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes and k– turbulence model equations , journal =. 2005 , author =

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.