Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Fractal Scaling of Moffatt Vortices in Triangular Cavity Flow

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that corner vortices in a slow lid-driven triangular cavity are fractal, with dimension rising from 1.23 to 1.78 as eddies shrink.

desk verdict Solid Moffatt vortex numerics, but the fractal dimension is an artifact of dropping k in Eq. (8); the headline claim should not stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.20976 v1 pith:RBCITKLR submitted 2026-07-23 physics.flu-dyn

Rathindra Nath Basak , Sougata Biswas , Jiten C. Kalita This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn MSC 28A8076D0576D0776M12
keywords cornervorticesMoffatttriangularcavityflowarea-perimetermethodfractaldimensionself-similarvortexcascadeStokeslid-driven
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the self-similar chain of corner vortices in a slow viscous flow inside a lid-driven isosceles triangular cavity is a fractal object, not just a geometric curiosity. Using the area-perimeter method on vortex envelopes modeled as semi-ellipses, it computes non-integer fractal dimensions between 1 and 2 for seven successive eddies and shows that the dimension increases as the vortices shrink and weaken. It also proposes a closed-form expression that predicts the fractal dimension of any vortex in the cascade from the primary vortex's perimeter and area, and claims the same fractal scaling persists at higher Reynolds numbers and in square-cavity corners. If correct, this connects a classical result in viscous corner flows—the geometric decay of corner eddies—to fractal geometry and gives a quantitative tool for describing multiscale confined vortices. The paper itself notes that the area-perimeter method is mesh-sensitive and that deeper vortices are harder to resolve.

What carries the argument

The area-perimeter method, which estimates fractal dimension from the power-law relation P=kA^{D/2}, applied to vortex envelopes approximated as semi-ellipses. The semi-ellipse assumption fixes the axis ratio a=2b, so each vortex's area is πab/2 and its perimeter is computed with a closed-form high-accuracy ellipse approximation. The resulting scaling ratios P_{n+1}/P_n≈0.5 and A_{n+1}/A_n≈0.25 feed the generalized expression D(n) in Eq.(13), which is the paper's main predictive tool.

What would settle it

Plot logP against logA for the seven resolved vortices using their actual simulated outer streamlines rather than assumed semi-ellipses. If the vortices are exact scaled copies, the points collapse onto a straight line of slope 1/2 (D=1), contradicting the reported non-integer dimensions; alternatively, fit Eq.(8) with k as a free parameter across all vortices and check whether D differs from 1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the corner-vortex cascade in the triangular cavity is a discrete fractal. At Re=1, the solver resolves seven nested counter-rotating eddies whose centers lie on the cavity midline, with successive size ratios of about 0.49 and intensity ratios of about 0.0012, matching the classical corner-vortex predictions. Modeling each eddy's bounding streamline as a semi-ellipse with major axis twice the minor axis, the paper obtains perimeters and areas that halve and quarter from one vortex to the next. Substituting these into the area-perimeter relation D≈2logP/logA gives fractal dimensions 1.229, 1.260, 1.299, 1.354, 1.432, 1.555, and 1.776 for vortices V1 thr

Load-bearing premise

In Section 4.2, Eqs. (8)–(13), the fractal dimensions rest on the assumptions that every vortex is an exact semi-elliptical copy with axis ratio 2:1, that perimeter and area scale by exactly 0.5 and 0.25, and that the constant k in P=kA^{D/2} can be dropped; if k is not exactly 1, the reported D values are an artifact of that choice rather than a property of the flow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equation (13) gives a grid-resolution-independent estimate of the fractal dimension of any vortex in the cascade from the primary vortex's perimeter and area alone.
  • The computed size and intensity ratios (about 0.49 and 0.0012) quantitatively reproduce the classical corner-vortex scaling, so the fractal description is anchored to a known viscous-flow result.
  • The persistence of the self-similar cascade at Re=100 and 500 suggests the fractal organization is not confined to the Stokes regime.
  • The square-cavity comparison indicates that corner-vortex fractality is a general feature of confined slow viscous flow rather than a peculiarity of the triangular geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because each vortex is modeled as an exact scaled copy of the same semi-ellipse, the slope of the combined logP-versus-logA plot is 1/2, which gives D=1; the reported per-vortex dimensions therefore depend on the arbitrary choice k=1 in Eq.(8), and a slope-based estimate of D should be checked against the paper's per-vortex values.
  • The same semi-ellipse-plus-geometric-scaling recipe could be applied to corner eddies at different wedge angles; the predicted inverse size–dimension relation would then become a quantitative test of how wedge geometry controls fractal complexity.
  • If the per-vortex dimension is a physical observable, it should converge as the mesh is refined; comparing D(n) from the coarser, medium, and fine grids used in the paper would separate a genuine scaling property from a finite-resolution artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports numerical simulations of steady lid-driven flow in an isosceles triangular cavity at low Reynolds number, resolving seven nested corner vortices. The authors compare their size and intensity ratios with Moffatt's theoretical predictions and with Taneda's experiments, obtaining ratios r_{n+1}/r_n ≈ 0.49 and ψ_{n+1}/ψ_n ≈ 0.0012. The central novelty is the claim, based on the area–perimeter method, that these vortices possess non-integer fractal dimensions between 1 and 2, expressed through Eq. (13) as a size-dependent dimension D(n). The paper also studies the effect of Reynolds number on vortex structure and compares corner vortices in a square cavity.

Significance. The numerical quantification of the Moffatt vortex cascade—seven eddies, intensity ratio ~0.0012, size ratio ~0.49, and agreement with Taneda's visualization—is a useful and credible contribution to the literature on corner vortices. The paper also provides reproducible-looking data in Tables 2–4 and a clear geometric model for the vortex envelopes. However, the central fractal claim is not supported by the analysis: the 'non-integer dimensions' in Tables 5 and 7 arise from omitting the prefactor k in Eq. (8), not from any measured geometric irregularity of the flow. For the exactly self-similar semi-elliptical envelopes used by the authors, the perimeter–area relation has D = 1 with a constant prefactor, and Eqs. (9) and (13) merely re-express the assumed 0.5/0.25 scaling ratios. The log–log line in Fig. 9 has slope 1/2, i.e., D = 1. Thus the principal claim of non-integer fractal dimension is an artifact, and the fractal interpretation of the vortex cascade is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (9) and Table 5] The fractal dimensions are computed from Eq. (9), D ≈ 2 log P / log A, after dropping the prefactor k in Eq. (8). For the semi-elliptical envelopes with a = 2b used in the paper, the shapes are smooth and exactly similar, so the correct perimeter–area relation is P = k A^{1/2} with k = [π/2(9−√35)+2]/√π ≈ 3.86, not k = 1. Substituting this relation into Eq. (9) gives D_i = 1 + 2 log k / log A_i. For the areas reported in Table 5, this reproduces the listed dimensions almost exactly (1.229, 1.260, 1.299, 1.354, 1.432, 1.555, 1.776). The 'size-dependent dimension' is therefore a finite-area correction, not a measured property of the flow.
  2. [Section 4.2, Eq. (13)] The proposed empirical relation D(n) is circular. It is derived by substituting P_n ≈ P1(0.5)^{n-1} and A_n ≈ A1(0.25)^{n-1} into Eq. (9). These scaling ratios are assumed from the semi-elliptical model with a = 2b and from the observed size ratios, not independently measured from the perimeter–area method. Consequently Eq. (13) restates the input assumptions rather than establishing a fractal dimension. The claim that 'the fractal perimeter dimension for any successive vortex can be dynamically estimated' is unsupported.
  3. [Section 4.2, Fig. 9] The log–log plot of P versus A for the seven semi-elliptical envelopes must have slope exactly 1/2 because all objects are exact scaled copies (P ∝ s, A ∝ s^2, so log P = 0.5 log A + constant). The correlation coefficient near 0.99 only confirms geometric similarity; it does not indicate a non-integer dimension. The sentence 'the slope of this line ... yields a non-integer fractal dimension' is incorrect: the slope is D/2, and here D = 1. The non-integer values in Table 5 arise solely from applying Eq. (9) to a single object without the prefactor.
  4. [Section 4.4, Table 7] The same k = 1 artifact affects the square-cavity dimensions. For the two corner vortices BL1 and BR1 the shapes are approximately right isosceles triangles (or similar smooth shapes), so their perimeter–area relation is again P = k A^{1/2} with a constant k. The reported D ≈ 1.56 and 1.54 are therefore equal to 1 + 2 log k / log A, not evidence of a non-integer perimeter dimension. Without a correct treatment of the prefactor, the square-cavity comparison does not support the claim of 'robust fractal behavior across geometries.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1, Eq. (7) and Table 4] The size ratio r_{n+1}/r_n is extracted from only five pairs (n=1,...,5) and the last ratio deviates to 0.4734. A standard-error or confidence-interval statement would strengthen the claimed agreement with Moffatt's prediction.
  2. [Section 4.2, paragraph after Eq. (13)] The phrase 'it can be shown that the fractal perimeter dimension continues to strictly obey equation (13)' is not a derivation. The scaling formulas for P1 and A1 with an arbitrary grid resolution m should be derived explicitly or referenced to an appendix.
  3. [Section 4.2, Table 5] The normalization b = 206 grid units for the primary vortex is plausible, but the assignment of b for the smaller vortices is never described. It would be helpful to state explicitly how the semi-ellipse axes are obtained from the computed streamlines for each vortex.
  4. [General] The text contains typographical artifacts such as 'G¨ ortler' and 'K´ arm´ an' in the introduction; these should be cleaned. The reference list would benefit from page numbers for articles cited with only an article number.
  5. [Section 4.4] The paper states that only BL1 and BR1 can be dimensioned because the grid is too coarse for smaller vortices. This limitation is acknowledged, but it also means that the square-cavity analysis does not test the cascade scaling that is the core claim for the triangular cavity.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

Non-integer fractal dimension is an artifact of dropping k in Eq. (9); Eq. (13) restates the assumed 0.5/0.25 vortex scaling rather than predicting it.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.2, Eq. (9) (after Eq. (8)); Table 5]
    "Assuming k is negligible for pure scaling purposes, the fractal perimeter dimension D for each vortex can be expressed as: D≈2 logP/logA."

    For the semi-elliptical envelopes used in Table 5, the true area-perimeter relation is P=k A^(1/2) with a single constant k, so D=1 for every vortex. Dropping k turns Eq. (9) into D=1+2log k/log A. With a=2b, k≈3.86, and substituting A_1=133316.6, A_2=A_1/4, ... reproduces Table 5 almost exactly (1.229, 1.260, 1.299, 1.354, 1.432, 1.555, 1.776). The reported non-integer dimensions are therefore finite-size corrections from the omitted prefactor, not a property measured from the flow.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2, Eq. (13) and preceding text]
    "By employing these scaling relations, we derive a generalized analytical expression... P_n≈P_1(0.5)^{n−1} and A_n≈A_1(0.25)^{n−1}, respectively. Substituting these into equation (9), the fractal perimeter dimension for any successive vortex in the cascade can be dynamically estimated as: D(n)≈..."

    Eq. (13) is not an independent prediction: it is the algebraic result of substituting the assumed geometric ratios P_{n+1}/P_n≈0.5 and A_{n+1}/A_n≈0.25 into Eq. (9). Since those ratios were already used to construct Table 5, Eq. (13) merely restates the model's inputs. Calling it a 'generalized analytical expression' that 'enables to find the fractal dimension of any successive vortex' presents an identity as an empirical discovery.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Section 4.2, Fig. 9 and surrounding discussion]
    "As illustrated in Fig. 9, the extracted data points collapse tightly onto a linear trend line with a correlation coefficient of approximately 0.99. The slope of this line, which corresponds to D/2, yields a non-integer fractal dimension that deviates from the standard Euclidean topological dimension of 1 for a simple closed curve."

    The log P vs log A points are exact scaled copies of the same semi-ellipse, so P∝√A and the regression slope is exactly 1/2, i.e. D=1. The high correlation confirms geometric similarity, not fractal complexity. Claiming the slope yields a non-integer dimension contradicts the paper's own construction: Eq. (9) gives D=1+2log k/log A_i, which varies from vortex to vortex, while a slope-based D/2 on the same data is necessarily 0.5. The non-integer conclusion is thus imposed by the per-point k=1 formula, not supported by the regression.

full rationale

The paper contains genuine, non-circular results: seven resolved corner eddies and the measured size and intensity ratios r_{n+1}/r_n≈0.49, ψ_{n+1}/ψ_n≈0.0012 agree with Moffatt's theory and Taneda's experiment, and those numerical findings are self-contained. However, the paper's central fractal claim is circular. Eq. (9) is obtained by setting k=1 in P=k A^{D/2}; for the smooth semi-elliptical envelopes used in Table 5, D is 1 and k is a constant fixed by a=2b, so Eq. (9) yields D=1+2log k/log A, matching Table 5 point by point. Eq. (13) is derived by inserting the assumed P_n≈P_1(0.5)^{n-1} and A_n≈A_1(0.25)^{n-1} into Eq. (9), so the 'predicted' dimension is an algebraic restatement of the assumed scaling ratios. The Fig. 9 regression, for exactly self-similar shapes, has slope 0.5 and hence D=1, contradicting the paper's claim that the slope gives a non-integer dimension. The square-cavity Table 7 values are produced by the same k=1 artifact. The self-citation [36] is not load-bearing for the fractal derivation, so this is not a self-citation problem; it is a fitted/assumed input presented as a measured prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the 'fractal dimension' is a derived shape metric, not a new conserved quantity or mediator. The key free parameters are the assumed geometric scaling ratios and the semi-ellipse axis ratio, which together force the D values reported.

free parameters (3)
  • size scaling ratio ξ ≈ 0.49 = 0.49 (asymptotic r_{n+1}/r_n from Table 4)
    Measured from the simulation, then used as the discrete scale-invariance ratio; the fractal conclusions inherit this value.
  • perimeter/area scaling ratios 0.5 and 0.25 = P_{n+1}/P_n = 0.5, A_{n+1}/A_n = 0.25
    Imposed by the semi-elliptical approximation with a=2b and used to derive Eq (13); the fractal dimension is a consequence of these chosen ratios.
  • semi-minor axis b = 206 grid units for finest grid = 206
    Normalization choice (lid discretized into 412 elements); all P and A values scale with b, so D values depend on this arbitrary normalization.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Moffatt's eigenvalue solution ψ = r^ν f(θ) for Stokes corner flow, with complex ν yielding infinite oscillatory eddies
    The paper uses Moffatt's theory as validation for the vortex ratio expectations; not re-derived here (Section 4.1, Eqs 7).
  • domain assumption Stokes-flow approximation holds at Re=1
    The paper sets Re=1 and treats it as Stokes regime; inertial effects are neglected in the Moffatt comparison though the full NS equations are solved.
  • ad hoc to paper Each vortex's outermost streamline is a semi-ellipse with a=2b
    Introduced in Section 4.2 to compute P and A; different envelope shapes would change D values.
  • ad hoc to paper Area-perimeter relation P=kA^{D/2} with k negligible (k=1) when using Eq (9)
    Eq (9) sets k=1, which is the source of the size-dependent D values; the true slope method would give D=1 for the exactly scaled semi-ellipses.
  • ad hoc to paper Discrete scale-invariance with fixed ratios 0.5 and 0.25
    Used to derive Eq (13) and to assert self-similarity; these ratios are built into the model, not emergent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractal Scaling of Moffatt Vortices in Triangular Cavity Flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RBCITKLR

@misc{pith2026260720976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractal Scaling of Moffatt Vortices in Triangular Cavity Flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RBCITKLR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.20976}
}
read the original abstract

This study examines the formation, quantification, and fractal characterization of corner vortices in slow viscous incompressible flow within a triangular cavity. The governing Navier-Stokes equations are solved numerically using a pressure-based coupled solver, and the resulting vortex cascade is analyzed through the size and intensity ratios of successive eddies in the spirit of Moffatt's theory of corner vortices. The fractal properties of the vortex sequence are then investigated using the area-perimeter method. An empirical relation is proposed to estimate the fractal dimension of any successive vortex in the cascade for arbitrary grid resolution. The results demonstrate that the corner vortices possess non-integer fractal dimensions between 1 and 2, and that this dimension is systematically linked to vortex size and intensity. The influence of Reynolds number on the fractal scaling is also examined. Finally, a comparative analysis of self-similarity in triangular and square cavities confirms that the observed corner-vortex cascade exhibits robust fractal behavior across geometries and flow regimes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Computers & fluids35(3), 326–348 (2006)

    Bruneau, C.H., Saad, M.: The 2D lid-driven cavity problem revisited. Computers & fluids35(3), 326–348 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics24(1), 113–151 (1966)

    Burggraf, O.R.: Analytical and numerical studies of the structure of steady separated flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics24(1), 113–151 (1966)

    1966

  3. [3]

    Journal of Computa- tional Physics48(3), 387–411 (1982) 29

    Ghia, U.K., Ghia, K.N., Shin, C.T.: High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the navier-stokes equations and a multigrid method. Journal of Computa- tional Physics48(3), 387–411 (1982) 29

    1982

  4. [4]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics285, 69–94 (1995)

    Jeong, J., Hussain, F.: On the identification of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics285, 69–94 (1995)

    1995

  5. [5]

    Journal of Fluids Engineering106(4), 390–398 (1984)

    Koseff, J.R., Street, R.L.: The lid-driven cavity flow: a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative observations. Journal of Fluids Engineering106(4), 390–398 (1984)

    1984

  6. [6]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids5(6), 561–575 (1985)

    Freitas, C.J., Street, R.L., Findikakis, A.N., Koseff, J.R.: Numerical simulation of three-dimensional flow in a cavity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids5(6), 561–575 (1985)

    1985

  7. [7]

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids23(4), 325–346 (1996)

    Chiang, T.P., Hwang, R.R., Sheu, W.H.: Finite volume analysis of spiral motion in a rectangular lid-driven cavity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids23(4), 325–346 (1996)

    1996

  8. [8]

    Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science30(7) (2020)

    Roman` o, F., T¨ urkbay, T., Kuhlmann, H.C.: Lagrangian chaos in steady three- dimensional lid-driven cavity flow. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science30(7) (2020)

    2020

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Physics of Fluids35(3) (2023)

    Babor, L., Kuhlmann, H.C.: Lagrangian transport in the time-periodic two- dimensional lid-driven square cavity. Physics of Fluids35(3) (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering47(12), 620 (2025)

    Basak, R.N., Biswas, S.: On the formation of U-shaped and ring-like vortex struc- tures in the lid-driven cavity flow. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering47(12), 620 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Meccanica61(1), 5 (2026)

    Basak, R.N., Biswas, S.: On the formation and exact location of Taylor-G¨ ortler- like vortices in a rectangular lid-driven cavity. Meccanica61(1), 5 (2026)

    2026

  4. [12]

    CFD Letters12(9), 1–14 (2020)

    Japar, W.M.A.A., Sidik, N.A.C., Saidur, R., Kamaruzaman, N., Asako, Y., Yusof, S.N.A.: The effect of triangular cavity shape on the hybrid microchannel heat sink performance. CFD Letters12(9), 1–14 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Zeitschrift f¨ ur naturforschung A70(11), 919–928 (2015)

    Javed, T., Siddiqui, M.A., Mehmood, Z., Pop, I.: MHD natural convective flow in an isosceles triangular cavity filled with porous medium due to uniform/non- uniform heated side walls. Zeitschrift f¨ ur naturforschung A70(11), 919–928 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    Nanomaterials12(9), 1469 (2022)

    Cherif, B.M., Abderrahmane, A., Saeed, A.M., Qasem, N.A., Younis, O., Mar- zouki, R., Chung, J.D., Shah, N.A.: Hydrothermal and entropy investigation of nanofluid mixed convection in triangular cavity with wavy boundary heated from below and rotating cylinders. Nanomaterials12...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics18(1), 1–18 (1964)

    Moffatt, H.K.: Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. Journal of Fluid Mechanics18(1), 1–18 (1964)

    1964

  8. [16]

    CRC Press, (2021) 30

    Papanastasiou, T., Georgiou, G., Alexandrou, A.N.: Viscous Fluid Flow. CRC Press, (2021) 30

    2021

  9. [17]

    McGraw-Hill New York vol

    White, F.M., Majdalani, J.: Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill New York vol. 3, (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Springer, pp

    Deville, M.O.: Stokes Flow, in An Introduction to the Mechanics of Incompressible Fluids. Springer, pp. 113–135 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol

    Dean, W.R., Montagnon, P.E.: On the steady motion of viscous liquid in a corner. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 45, pp. 389–394 (1949). Cambridge University Press

    1949

  12. [20]

    Archiwum Mechaniki Stosowanej16(2), 365–372 (1964)

    Moffatt, H.K.: Viscous eddies near a sharp corner. Archiwum Mechaniki Stosowanej16(2), 365–372 (1964)

    1964

  13. [21]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan46(6), 1935–1942 (1979)

    Taneda, S.: Visualization of separating stokes flows. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan46(6), 1935–1942 (1979)

    1935

  14. [22]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics746, 3 (2014)

    Kirkinis, E., Davis, S.H.: Moffatt vortices induced by the motion of a contact line. Journal of Fluid Mechanics746, 3 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics522, 117–139 (2005)

    Malhotra, C.P., Weidman, P.D., Davis, A.M.J.: Nested toroidal vortices between concentric cones. Journal of Fluid Mechanics522, 117–139 (2005)

    2005

  16. [24]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics522, 101–116 (2005)

    Malyuga, V.S.: Viscous eddies in a circular cone. Journal of Fluid Mechanics522, 101–116 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics539, 113– 135 (2005)

    Shankar, P.N.: Moffatt eddies in the cone. Journal of Fluid Mechanics539, 113– 135 (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics28, 651–656 (2014)

    Shtern, V.: Moffatt eddies at an interface. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics28, 651–656 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    Biswas, G., Breuer, M., Durst, F.: Backward-facing step flows for various expan- sion ratios at low and moderate reynolds numbers. J. Fluids Eng.126(3), 362–374 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    Physics of Fluids20(10) (2008)

    Heaton, C.J.: On the appearance of Moffatt eddies in viscous cavity flow as the aspect ratio varies. Physics of Fluids20(10) (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics950, 19 (2022)

    Kirkinis, E., Mason, J., De La Cruz, M.O.: Odd-viscosity-induced passivation of Moffatt vortices. Journal of Fluid Mechanics950, 19 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol

    Biswas, S., Kalita, J.C.: Moffatt vortices in the lid-driven cavity flow. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 759, p. 012081 (2016). IOP Publishing

    2016

  23. [31]

    Computers & Mathematics with Applications76(3), 471–487 (2018) 31

    Biswas, S., Kalita, J.C.: Moffatt eddies in the driven cavity: a quantification study by an hoc approach. Computers & Mathematics with Applications76(3), 471–487 (2018) 31

    2018

  24. [32]

    International Polymer Processing33(5), 662–668 (2018)

    Polychronopoulos, N.D., Vlachopoulos, J.: Computer flow simulation of Moffatt eddies in single screw extrusion. International Polymer Processing33(5), 662–668 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science116, 110116 (2020)

    Naumov, I.V., Sharifullin, B.R., Kravtsova, A.Y., Shtern, V.: Velocity jumps and the Moffatt eddy in two-fluid swirling flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science116, 110116 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics953, 14 (2022)

    He, X., Sun, Z., Zhang, M.: Moffatt eddies in electrohydrodynamics flows: numerical simulations and analyses. Journal of Fluid Mechanics953, 14 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics941, 64 (2022)

    Taylor-West, J.J., Hogg, A.J.: Viscoplastic corner eddies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics941, 64 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik69(2), 37 (2018)

    Kalita, J.C., Biswas, S., Panda, S.: Finiteness of corner vortices. Zeitschrift f¨ ur angewandte Mathematik und Physik69(2), 37 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    New York (1983)

    Mandelbrot, B.B.: The fractal geometry of nature/revised and enlarged edition. New York (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Science216(4542), 185–187 (1982)

    Lovejoy, S.: Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science216(4542), 185–187 (1982)

    1982

  31. [39]

    Physical review letters 56(7), 784 (1986)

    Rys, F.S., Waldvogel, A.: Fractal shape of hail clouds. Physical review letters 56(7), 784 (1986)

    1986

  32. [40]

    27, March 1986, p

    Henderson-Sellers, A.: Are Martian clouds fractals? Royal Astronomical Society, Quarterly Journal (ISSN 0035-8738), vol. 27, March 1986, p. 90-93.27, 90–93 (1986)

    1986

  33. [41]

    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Bazell, D., Desert, F.X.: Fractal structure of interstellar cirrus. Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 333, Oct. 1, 1988, p. 353-358.333, 353–358 (1988)

    1988

  34. [42]

    Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 20(1), 5–16 (1988)

    Turcotte, D.L.: Fractals in fluid mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 20(1), 5–16 (1988)

    1988

  35. [43]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics150, 427–440 (1985)

    Constantin, P., Foias, C., Manley, O.P., Temam, R.: Determining modes and fractal dimension of turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics150, 427–440 (1985)

    1985

  36. [44]

    Annual review of fluid mechanics23(1), 539–604 (1991)

    Sreenivasan, K.R.: Fractals and multifractals in fluid turbulence. Annual review of fluid mechanics23(1), 539–604 (1991)

    1991

  37. [45]

    European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids18(5), 959– 975 (1999) 32

    Ueki, Y., Tsuji, Y., Nakamura, I.: Fractal analysis of a circulating flow field with two different velocity laws. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids18(5), 959– 975 (1999) 32

    1999

  38. [46]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics502, 65–87 (2004)

    Mazzi, B., Vassilicos, J.C.: Fractal-generated turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics502, 65–87 (2004)

    2004

  39. [47]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics85(5), 056314 (2012)

    Balankin, A.S., Elizarraraz, B.E.: Map of fluid flow in fractal porous medium into fractal continuum flow. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics85(5), 056314 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    The European Physical Journal E39, 1–8 (2016)

    Lanotte, A.S., Malapaka, S.K., Biferale, L.: On the vortex dynamics in fractal Fourier turbulence. The European Physical Journal E39, 1–8 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Acta Mechanica233(1), 363–381 (2022)

    El-Nabulsi, R.A., Anukool, W.: Fractal dimensions in fluid dynamics and their effects on the Rayleigh problem, the Burger’s vortex and the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Acta Mechanica233(1), 363–381 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Fractal and Fractional6(9), 477 (2022)

    Li, P., Tao, R., Yang, S., Zhu, D., Xiao, R.: Temporal and spatial analysis on the fractal characteristics of the helical vortex rope. Fractal and Fractional6(9), 477 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Fractal and Fractional7(6), 467 (2023)

    Zhang, F., Zuo, Y., Zhu, D., Tao, R., Xiao, R.: Investigation of fractal character- istics of Karman vortex for naca0009 hydrofoil. Fractal and Fractional7(6), 467 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Ramanujan, S.: Modular equations and approximations toπ. Quart. J. Math45, 350–372 (1914)

    1914

  45. [53]

    Algorithms17(10), 464 (2024) 33

    Moscato, P., Ciezak, A.: A new approximation for the perimeter of an ellipse. Algorithms17(10), 464 (2024) 33

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.