Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 63 references

A single ratio of brane position to horizon controls the one-point function in expanding holographic universes.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:28 UTC pith:JNU2XWHU

load-bearing objection First one-point function in the moving-brane braneworld, with clean power laws, but the GM-formula transplant is not justified and the paper has internal normalization slips. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21107 v1 pith:JNU2XWHU submitted 2026-07-23 hep-th

One-point holographic correlator in the expanding universe

Souvik Paul , Gopinath Guin , Sunandan Gangopadhyay This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords holographic one-point functionbraneworld cosmologyRandall-Sundrum IIAdS black branethermal one-point functiongeodesic approximationp-brane gasIsrael junction condition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that thermal one-point functions of heavy operators in an expanding braneworld universe are governed by one number: the ratio of the moving brane's radial position to the black-brane horizon. Using the geodesic formula for large-mass operators, it finds that the correlator is essentially that ratio raised to the conformal dimension, up to a constant p-dependent phase, so all time dependence enters through the brane's trajectory. Applied to radiation-, matter-, and exotic-matter-dominated universes, this gives late-time decays scaling as τ^{-Δ/2}, τ^{-2Δ/3}, and τ^{-Δ}. A sympathetic reader would care because it connects the expansion history of the universe to the decay of a holographic condensate through a simple power law, and it brings the interior-horizon one-point function machinery into a cosmological setting.

Core claim

The central claim is eqs. (4.24)-(4.25): for a bulk p-brane gas, the thermal one-point function of an operator of conformal dimension Δ is ⟨O⟩_p(τ) ≈ (z̄(τ)/z_h)^Δ 2^{-2Δ/(4-p)} e^{-iΔπ/(4-p)}, so its modulus is just the current position-to-horizon ratio raised to Δ. Substituting the brane trajectories obtained from the Israel junction condition yields explicit time dependence: radiation gives τ^{-Δ/2}, matter gives τ^{-2Δ/3}, and exotic matter gives τ^{-Δ} at late times, with radiation dominating the early-time behavior and matter or exotic matter governing the late-time decay in multi-component universes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ratio z̄(τ)/z_h, where z̄ = 1/r is the inverse radial position of the brane and z_h is the black-brane horizon. The geodesic formula expresses the one-point function as e^{-Δ(l_h + iT_s)}, with l_h the renormalized spacelike length from the brane to the horizon and T_s the proper time from horizon to singularity. For the p-brane metric these lengths evaluate to log(z_h/z̄) + log(4/(4-p)) and π/(4-p), producing the power law above. The formula does the work of converting a geometric distance-to-horizon into an operator expectation value.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, flagged in the paper's own footnote, is that the geodesic formula derived for operators on the boundary of an AdS black hole remains valid when the boundary is replaced by a moving brane treated as momentarily fixed; if that quasi-static step fails, the predicted power-law decay does not follow.

What would settle it

One concrete check: evaluate the one-point function by solving the bulk scalar equation on the time-dependent brane geometry without the fixed-brane approximation and see whether the late-time scaling remains τ^{-Δ/2}, τ^{-2Δ/3}, τ^{-Δ}; a different power law would falsify the central claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • In single-component universes the modulus of the one-point function decays monotonically in time, with exponents Δ/2, 2Δ/3, and Δ for radiation, matter, and exotic matter; the phase is constant.
  • In multi-component universes the early-time behavior is set by radiation and the late-time behavior by the dominant pressure component, matching the standard cosmological timeline.
  • The time dependence factorizes from the operator: all heavy operators with the same conformal dimension share the same decay exponent, only the normalization differs.
  • For the multi-component cases T_s is independent of the brane position, so the phase never contributes to the time evolution and only the modulus carries cosmological information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-ratio rule survives the quasi-static approximation, it suggests that in these braneworlds every geodesically controlled heavy-operator observable is a function of z̄(τ)/z_h; one could test that by computing two-point or higher-point functions on the same brane trajectories.
  • The late-time decay implies ⟨O⟩ behaves like a^{-Δ} in terms of the scale factor, since z̄ ∝ a^{-1} in these solutions; this hints at a general statement about how vacuum condensates redshift in holographic cosmologies.
  • A direct numerical check would be to solve the bulk scalar equation on the actual time-dependent brane geometry—including brane motion in the saddle-point integral—rather than freezing the brane position, and compare the late-time scaling.
  • Because the phase in the multi-component cases is purely constant, one can look for observables sensitive to that phase alone as a clean signature of the horizon-to-singularity geodesic length.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the time-dependent thermal one-point function of a massive scalar operator in an expanding Randall–Sundrum II braneworld, with the matter content realized by p-brane gas in the bulk. The brane trajectory z̄(τ) is obtained from the second Israel junction condition for radiation (p=0), matter (p=1), and exotic matter (p=2), as well as for radiation–matter and radiation–exotic-matter universes. The one-point function is then obtained by inserting these trajectories into the Grinberg–Maldacena geodesic formula ⟨O⟩ ∼ e^{-Δ(l_h + i T_s)}, with l_h computed from the brane to the horizon and T_s from the horizon to the singularity. The paper claims clean late-time power laws: τ^{-Δ/2}, τ^{-2Δ/3}, τ^{-Δ} for the three single-component cases, with radiation dominating early-time and matter/exotic matter dominating late-time behavior in the multi-component cases.

Significance. If the calculation were fully justified, the paper would provide a simple holographic prediction for how one-point correlators decay in an expanding braneworld, with the time dependence entering purely through the ratio z̄(τ)/z_h and no fitted parameters. The algebraic skeleton is largely sound: the integrals (4.19)–(4.22) are correct and the substitution of z̄(τ) into the exponential is transparent. However, the central result is conditional on two unproven steps: the transplant of the static, boundary-at-infinity Grinberg–Maldacena formula to a moving finite brane, and the use of that WKB/large-mass formula for conformal dimensions near the BF bound. Both are load-bearing for every displayed power law. The paper is therefore not yet in publishable form, but the issues are of a kind that could be addressed by restricting the claims, adding estimates, or supplying the missing derivation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.14)–(4.25), footnote 3] The central step is the replacement of the static AdS-boundary setup of [1] by a moving finite brane. Eq. (4.14) is derived for a static AdS black hole with the boundary at infinity, using a WKB saddle at complex radius and analytic continuation to the singularity. Here the same exponential is used with l_h measured from the instantaneous brane position z̄(τ), and z̄(τ) is then substituted from the Israel junction condition. Footnote 3 asserts that this is justified because the calculation is performed 'at a fixed cosmological time', but no estimate of the neglected z̄̇ terms or of the effect of the finite moving cutoff on the saddle/contour argument is supplied. This is load-bearing: without a derivation or a quantitative adiabaticity bound, Eq. (4.25) is an ansatz rather than a consequence. Citing [36] for the same practice does not remove the need for the estimate.
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.10)–(4.14), Figs. 3–5] The geodesic formula is derived under the WKB condition mR ≫ 1, with Δ ≈ mR (see the text between Eqs. (4.9) and (4.14)). Yet the paper plots and discusses Δ = 1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1. Using Eq. (4.2) with the minus branch, these correspond to m²R² between -3.75 and -3.99, i.e. very close to the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound, far outside the mR ≫ 1 regime. The paper itself notes the BF bound but does not explain why the large-mass saddle-point result should continue to these Δ values. Either the claims must be restricted to Δ ≫ 1 and the small-Δ plots removed or explicitly labeled as unjustified extrapolations, or an analytic-continuation argument extending (4.14) to near-BF-bound dimensions must be supplied.
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (4.24) versus Eqs. (4.26), (4.29), (4.33)] The advertised central result, Eq. (4.24), contains the prefactor 2^{-2Δ/(4-p)}. Setting p = 0, 1, 2 gives 2^{-Δ/2}, 2^{-2Δ/3}, and 2^{-Δ}, i.e. e^{-(2 ln 2)Δ/(4-p)}. The specialized single-component formulas (4.26), (4.29), and (4.33) instead contain e^{-Δ/2}, e^{-2Δ/3}, and e^{-Δ}, respectively, missing the factor ln2 in the exponent. The same incorrect normalization enters the plots. Although this error does not change the late-time powers, it is an inconsistency in the central formula itself and must be corrected.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1/§4.1, Eq. (4.27) and Conclusion] The text says the early-time one-point function 'grows as' τ^{1/2}, τ^{2/3}, and τ, and the conclusion repeats 'polynomial growth'. However Eqs. (4.27), (4.30), and (4.34) are of the form A(1 - c τ^α), so the correlator decreases with time. Please rephrase to say that the time-dependent correction grows in magnitude, or that the one-point function decays, to avoid contradicting the figures.
  2. [§4.2.2, around Eq. (4.58)] In the paragraph after Eq. (4.57), the text refers to 'a universe with coexisting radiation and matter', but the calculation in this subsection is for radiation plus exotic matter. This wording appears several times and should be corrected.
  3. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.18)–(4.21)] Notation and presentation: the statement in Eq. (4.18) that only leading-order terms in z̄ are written is imprecise, since the sum is subsequently evaluated exactly and the neglected terms are higher powers of z̄ in the l_h expansion. In Eq. (4.21), the first line appears to have a measure typo (dz/z_h instead of dz/z). Also, define r̃, m̃, δ̃, z_t, and r_t consistently and state their dimensions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the time-dependent one-point function follows from the external Grinberg–Maldacena formula plus the Israel-junction brane motion, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, the central result (4.24)–(4.25) is assembled from the external Grinberg–Maldacena geodesic formula (4.14), the direct integrations l_h = log(z_h/z̄) + log 4/(4−p) in (4.19) and T_s = π/(4−p) in (4.22), and the brane trajectories z̄(τ) obtained by integrating the Israel junction condition in Section 3. No parameter is fitted to the one-point function; z_i, z_h, and Δ are independent inputs, and the late-time powers τ^{−Δ/2}, τ^{−2Δ/3}, τ^{−Δ} are simply the composition of these explicit formulas. The self-citations [45,46] accompany brane-motion and lapse-function results that are re-derived in Section 3, so they are not load-bearing; deleting them would not change the calculation. The fixed-brane-position/quasi-static assumption in footnote 3 and the use of a large-mass saddle for Δ near the BF bound are validity or regime concerns, not circular reductions: they do not make the output equal to an input by construction. No specific circular step can be exhibited, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the holographic dictionary, the Grinberg-Maldacena geodesic formula (used at a finite cutoff without re-derivation), the RS-II junction-condition dynamics, the p-brane-gas dictionary for the lapse function, and the quasi-static instant-evaluation ansatz. Free parameters are the integration/plot choices (z_i, z_h), the critical-tension tuning σ_c, and the density-ratio parameters; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Initial brane position z_i = 0.5 (in plots)
    Integration constant from the Israel junction condition; used in early-time expansions and Figs. 3-5; chosen by hand, not fitted to data.
  • Horizon position z_h = 2 (in plots)
    Sets the black-brane horizon scale; chosen for the plot curves; appears in constants of all power-law results.
  • Critical brane tension σ_c = set by σ = σ_c
    Condition used in eqs. (3.6)-(3.7), (3.12), (3.17) to make the brane FLRW-like; standard RS tuning, but a model input chosen rather than derived.
  • Density ratios (r̃, m̃, δ̃, z_t) = unspecified
    Parameters of p-brane gas / black-brane mass in lapse function (3.5); treated as small perturbations in multi-component expansions; not fitted here.
  • Conformal dimension Δ = 1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1 in plots
    Used to draw curves; chosen within BF bound but outside the large-mass regime where the geodesic formula is derived.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence with GKPW dictionary
    Used throughout (§1, §4) to equate bulk heavy-scalar one-point functions with boundary operator one-point functions.
  • domain assumption Grinberg-Maldacena geodesic formula ⟨O⟩ ~ e^{-Δ(l_h + iT_s)}
    Imported from [1]; the paper relies on the WKB saddle point, analytic continuation to the singularity, and W^2 source balance without re-derivation (eqs. (4.13)-(4.14)).
  • domain assumption Large-mass WKB limit: Δ ≈ mR for mR ≫ 1
    Stated in §1 and §4 before eq. (4.10); contradicts the Δ ~ 1.5-2.1 values used in plots.
  • domain assumption RS-II braneworld with second Israel junction condition determines brane motion
    Basic framework of §2-(2.18); time-dependent brane position equals scale factor.
  • domain assumption p-brane gas backreaction yields lapse function f(z)=1-(z/z_h)^{4-p}-m̃z^4
    Result of §3 eq. (3.5), drawn from prior p-brane gas literature [46,49]; used for all subsequent integrals.
  • ad hoc to paper Quasi-static evaluation of correlator at fixed brane position
    Footnote 3: 'the whole calculation is performed at a fixed cosmological time that is at a fixed brane position'; the instantaneous approximation is asserted, not derived.
  • standard math BF bound and stability of scalar in AdS
    Eq. (4.3) used to justify plotting Δ values; standard stability criterion.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21378 in / 27759 out tokens · 239121 ms · 2026-08-01T08:28:07.461319+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this article, we have calculated the time-dependent thermal one-point function of massive operators within an expanding universe. We employ the Randall-Sundrum II braneworld model combined with a $p$-brane gas in the bulk, enabling us to represent various matter-dominated cosmological scenarios localised on the brane. Applying the geodesic formula introduced by Grinberg and Maldacena in \cite{Grinberg:2020fdj}, we have calculated the thermal one-point functions of massive operators within the universe. The time-dependent one-point functions for different matter-dominated universes, both single-component and multi-component, are derived from the brane's evolving radial position. The time-dependent positions of the branes have been obtained using the second Israel junction condition. Additionally, we have analyzed the early and late-time behaviors of the thermal one-point function across various matter-dominated universes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 43 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Grinberg and J

    M. Grinberg and J. Maldacena,Proper time to the black hole singularity from thermal one-point functions,JHEP03(2021) 131 [2011.01004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  2. [2]

    Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  6. [6]

    Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, vol

    M. Natsuume,AdS/CFT Duality User Guide, vol. 903 (2015), 10.1007/978-4-431-55441-7, [1409.3575]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Năstase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence, Cambridge University Press (2015)

    H. Năstase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence, Cambridge University Press (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    Hubeny,The AdS/CFT Correspondence,Class

    V.E. Hubeny,The AdS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 124010 [1501.00007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Balasubramanian and S.F

    V. Balasubramanian and S.F. Ross,Holographic particle detection,Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 044007 [hep-th/9906226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  10. [10]

    Banks, M.R

    T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec,AdS dynamics from conformal field theory,hep-th/9808016. – 29 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Louko, D

    J. Louko, D. Marolf and S.F. Ross,On geodesic propagators and black hole holography,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 044041 [hep-th/0002111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  12. [12]

    Susskind and E

    L. Susskind and E. Witten,The Holographic bound in anti-de Sitter space, hep-th/9805114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Myers, T

    R.C. Myers, T. Sierens and W. Witczak-Krempa,A Holographic Model for Quantum Critical Responses,JHEP05(2016) 073 [1602.05599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Wentzel,Eine verallgemeinerung der quantenbedingungen für die zwecke der wellenmechanik,Zeitschrift für Physik38(1926) 518

    G. Wentzel,Eine verallgemeinerung der quantenbedingungen für die zwecke der wellenmechanik,Zeitschrift für Physik38(1926) 518

    1926

  15. [15]

    Kramers,Wellenmechanik und halbzahlige quantisierung,Zeitschrift für Physik 39(1926) 828

    H.A. Kramers,Wellenmechanik und halbzahlige quantisierung,Zeitschrift für Physik 39(1926) 828

    1926

  16. [16]

    Brillouin,La mécanique ondulatoire de schrödinger; une méthode générale de résolution par approximations successives,CR Acad

    L. Brillouin,La mécanique ondulatoire de schrödinger; une méthode générale de résolution par approximations successives,CR Acad. Sci183(1926) 24

    1926

  17. [17]

    A. Saha, A. Roy Chowdhury and S. Gangopadhyay,A holographic realization of correlation and mutual information,Phys. Lett. B870(2025) 139933 [2501.07091]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Fischler and S

    W. Fischler and S. Kundu,Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: High and Low Temperature Behavior of Non-local Observables,JHEP05(2013) 098 [1212.2643]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Krishna and D

    H. Krishna and D. Rodriguez-Gomez,Holographic thermal correlators revisited, JHEP11(2021) 139 [2108.00277]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Keranen, W

    V. Keranen, W. Sybesma, P. Szepietowski and L. Thorlacius,Correlation functions in theories with Lifshitz scaling,JHEP05(2017) 033 [1611.09371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Rodriguez-Gomez and J.G

    D. Rodriguez-Gomez and J.G. Russo,Correlation functions in finite temperature CFT and black hole singularities,JHEP06(2021) 048 [2102.11891]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Grinberg,Thermal one-point functions in black brane anti-de Sitter space, bachelor thesis, Princeton U., 5, 2020

    M. Grinberg,Thermal one-point functions in black brane anti-de Sitter space, bachelor thesis, Princeton U., 5, 2020

    2020

  23. [23]

    Park,Correlation functions of boundary and defect conformal field theories,Phys

    C. Park,Correlation functions of boundary and defect conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 046010 [2405.15108]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    H. Kim, J. Pal and C. Park,Holographic description for correlation functions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 126019 [2312.12669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Park,Holographic two-point functions in a disorder system,Phys

    C. Park,Holographic two-point functions in a disorder system,Phys. Lett. B842 (2023) 137978 [2209.07721]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Berenstein and R

    D. Berenstein and R. Mancilla,Aspects of thermal one-point functions and response functions in AdS black holes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126010 [2211.05144]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    David and S

    J.R. David and S. Kumar,Thermal one-point functions: CFT’s with fermions, large d and large spin,JHEP10(2023) 143 [2307.14847]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Georgiou and D

    G. Georgiou and D. Zoakos,Holographic correlation functions at finite density and/or finite temperature,JHEP11(2022) 087 [2209.14661]. – 30 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Dodelson, A

    M. Dodelson, A. Grassi, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Zhiboedov,Holographic thermal correlators from supersymmetric instantons,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 116 [2206.07720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Park, S.-J

    C. Park, S.-J. Kim and J.H. Lee,Holographic two-point functions in medium,Mod. Phys. Lett. A39(2024) 2450004 [2212.01214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    P. Dey, A. Goldar and N. Kajuri,Geodesics, One Point Functions and Black Hole Perturbations,2601.09397

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Caceres, S

    E. Caceres, S. Shashi and H.-Y. Sun,Imprints of phase transitions on Kasner singularities,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 126018 [2305.11177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Frenkel, S.A

    A. Frenkel, S.A. Hartnoll, J. Kruthoff and Z.D. Shi,Holographic flows from CFT to the Kasner universe,JHEP08(2020) 003 [2004.01192]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Caputa, D

    P. Caputa, D. Das and S.R. Das,Path integral complexity and Kasner singularities, JHEP01(2022) 150 [2111.04405]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Bhowmick, S. Chatterjee and S. Mukherji,A note on AdS cosmology and gauge theory correlator,JHEP06(2015) 043 [1501.06317]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    C. Park, H. Kim and K. Cho,Correlation functions in expanding universes,Mod. Phys. Lett. A41(2026) 2550233 [2405.15168]

    arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Friedman,On the Curvature of space,Z

    A. Friedman,On the Curvature of space,Z. Phys.10(1922) 377

    1922

  38. [38]

    Friedmann,On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space,Z

    A. Friedmann,On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space,Z. Phys.21(1924) 326

    1924

  39. [39]

    Lemaitre,A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-galactic Nebulæ,Mon

    G. Lemaitre,A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-galactic Nebulæ,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.91(1931) 483

    1931

  40. [40]

    Lemaitre,The expanding universe,Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre,The expanding universe,Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A53(1933) 51

    1933

  41. [41]

    Robertson,Kinematics and World-Structure

    H.P. Robertson,Kinematics and World-Structure. 2,Astrophys. J.83(1935) 187

    1935

  42. [42]

    Robertson,Kinematics and World-Structure,Astrophys

    H.P. Robertson,Kinematics and World-Structure,Astrophys. J.82(1935) 284

    1935

  43. [43]

    Walker,On Milne’s Theory of World-Structure,Proc

    A.G. Walker,On Milne’s Theory of World-Structure,Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42 (1937) 90

    1937

  44. [44]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B 44S10(1966) 1

    1966

  45. [45]

    Mahanta, G

    R. Mahanta, G. Guin, S. Paul and S. Gangopadhyay,Entanglement entropy and complexity of multi-component universe from holography,Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics(2026) ptag115 [2601.05628]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    S. Paul, G. Guin and S. Gangopadhyay,Holographic entanglement entropy and complexity for the cosmological braneworld model,JHEP08(2025) 164 [2505.11553]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Chamblin and H.S

    H.A. Chamblin and H.S. Reall,Dynamic dilatonic domain walls,Nucl. Phys. B562 (1999) 133 [hep-th/9903225]. – 31 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  48. [48]

    Arnowitt, S

    R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner,Dynamical Structure and Definition of Energy in General Relativity,Phys. Rev.116(1959) 1322

    1959

  49. [49]

    Park,Holographic time-dependent entanglement entropy in p-brane gas geometries,Phys

    C. Park,Holographic time-dependent entanglement entropy in p-brane gas geometries,Phys. Lett. B838(2023) 137672 [2106.05500]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Park,Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy in Holographic FLRW Cosmologies,Phys

    C. Park,Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy in Holographic FLRW Cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 126006 [2004.08020]. [51]WMAPcollaboration,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation,Astrophys. J. Suppl.192(2011) 18 [1001.4538]. [52]WMAPcollaboration,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [55]

    Breitenlohner and D.Z

    P. Breitenlohner and D.Z. Freedman,Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 197

    1982

  52. [56]

    Hartnoll, C.P

    S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz,Holographic Superconductors,JHEP 12(2008) 015 [0810.1563]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [57]

    Hartnoll, C.P

    S.A. Hartnoll, C.P. Herzog and G.T. Horowitz,Building a Holographic Superconductor,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 031601 [0803.3295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [58]

    Herzog,Lectures on Holographic Superfluidity and Superconductivity,J

    C.P. Herzog,Lectures on Holographic Superfluidity and Superconductivity,J. Phys. A 42(2009) 343001 [0904.1975]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  55. [59]

    Horowitz,Introduction to Holographic Superconductors,Lect

    G.T. Horowitz,Introduction to Holographic Superconductors,Lect. Notes Phys.828 (2011) 313 [1002.1722]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [60]

    Li, R.-G

    H.-F. Li, R.-G. Cai and H.-Q. Zhang,Analytical Studies on Holographic Superconductors in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity,JHEP04(2011) 028 [1103.2833]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [61]

    Gangopadhyay and D

    S. Gangopadhyay and D. Roychowdhury,Analytic study of properties of holographic superconductors in Born-Infeld electrodynamics,JHEP05(2012) 002 [1201.6520]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [62]

    Paul and S

    S. Paul and S. Gangopadhyay,Noncommutative p-wave holographic superconductors, Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 185016 [2502.08275]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [63]

    Weyl,Reine infinitesimalgeometrie,Mathematische Zeitschrift2(1918) 384

    H. Weyl,Reine infinitesimalgeometrie,Mathematische Zeitschrift2(1918) 384

    1918

  60. [64]

    Weinberg and R.V

    S. Weinberg and R.V. Wagoner,Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity, 1973

    1973

  61. [65]

    Cordova, J

    C. Cordova, J. Maldacena and G.J. Turiaci,Bounds on OPE Coefficients from Interference Effects in the Conformal Collider,JHEP11(2017) 032 [1710.03199]. – 32 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [66]

    Meltzer and E

    D. Meltzer and E. Perlmutter,Beyonda=c: gravitational couplings to matter and the stress tensor OPE,JHEP07(2018) 157 [1712.04861]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [67]

    David and S

    J.R. David and S. Kumar,Thermal one point functions, large d and interior geometry of black holes,JHEP03(2023) 256 [2212.07758]. – 33 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023