Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review

As of 12 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 33 of 33 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.22553.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2607.22553 v1

Coverage vector

measured 33 of 33 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

measured 33 of 33 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

33 of 33 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved33
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation f48863e8-3143-4857-9f7e-40e151e536bf · outbound

This paper cites A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.048263Z digest=sha256:18bc3a167406db09419f5c88e95eda5277f5ba5fd8cfd46e7d6652f28cf46885

Observation 8f031eb2-307d-425d-8850-2a5c4e9f06a6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , url =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , url =

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.100131Z digest=sha256:dc80e8b9132bf257b64c8be6f78fddabc109f0584fc92bbe7ec0eb7472c47a50

Observation 142b4344-ea87-4db5-9895-281df0fc8285 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , doi =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , doi =

Reference 3

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.173000Z digest=sha256:cafcc52b170ed701f4b33d5056c7cf3b70ffa3e509461edea9ccde8ccb9a2108

Observation d000ce06-1f1e-4ca6-ae73-d299b2e176d8 · outbound

This paper cites 2024 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2024 , eprint =

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.246499Z digest=sha256:066a044058afdc845dfef5725a30a5550c53a754c45f4fcf2d91e963c7e631d7

Observation 8fe7d292-aed9-4275-bbce-4ee7dd587fd0 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of INLG 2020 , year =

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.356517Z digest=sha256:c1db1bee5f2477c788c13da8a08a911f2dfed52944569bfd96d3fc46536bebb4

Observation 3018704f-ac7b-4341-bf94-43cfff9beb78 · outbound

This paper cites Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume =

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.488513Z digest=sha256:d4810e6b79e49ae6617f47874c56776b292f2901b2050300360f237f8cd1e5b5

Observation d4e37bbc-0a91-401c-bd01-968de156f989 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.604970Z digest=sha256:fc4148150e392949b6e27323fe1ce35b1632d0717693efbc80b697cf7dbf4bc5

Observation 1c323fdc-4d56-4d2f-b978-4eccca9bea24 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint =

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.715276Z digest=sha256:1972d62a9a0cf3642466887737e22d917f0d1223a27b59c4889cc3057c85da49

Observation 6592163d-c79c-4f60-a397-d83a752ebca6 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of ACL 2025 (Long Papers) , year =

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.848020Z digest=sha256:6ee9e6c75afb6d995e7a01e08501a21fa1f240936bcc9d49084677610d384022

Observation 921c3332-43f9-4db5-a634-5ebfd92cc4f1 · outbound

This paper cites Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Investigating AI Text Detectability in Peer Review

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:26.956460Z digest=sha256:5a24e00961ee8bbbaf195e4190ca07cf504c01cc45e15b9e3d4a40f42a034f76

Observation 184d1fc7-0313-427e-8e8e-cba0e47348c9 · outbound

This paper cites Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.030239Z digest=sha256:734d24e51aa2402b70472a63ed5f5ea6b845f143ee4837e11b82dd1641de2ef8

Observation 221a042e-b85b-498a-bd5a-d54ff826dd97 · outbound

This paper cites NEJM AI , volume =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review NEJM AI , volume =

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.103844Z digest=sha256:b1a9072114046cd6b47e809adcbe23d9bef07893260da0de3fe97b55727dce91

Observation 60f712bd-1bf0-4c8b-bd84-204fb1668612 · outbound

This paper cites AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review AI-Driven Review Systems: Evaluating LLMs in Scalable and Bias-Aware Academic Reviews

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.204073Z digest=sha256:a8df99e54f68cb5237b02aee401654d1313c373be679fab890d3fc38ecf9b23d

Observation 218d4d5e-2256-4175-8c93-5309df1970e6 · outbound

This paper cites 2023 , eprint =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2023 , eprint =

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.302769Z digest=sha256:a9fa124722cf398227ad86b811f934aaf4ec3e8debca07c1a284dcd0853e0988

Observation 3320b049-02ff-40a7-9178-92aed793b4dc · outbound

This paper cites Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.403675Z digest=sha256:c93fb6595ea312bb658c9b89abd0b65f3d3571acb88b8ce1ccd090891710be29

Observation 3d4faac9-018d-42c0-91ee-68dcf3821c15 · outbound

This paper cites Scientometrics , volume=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Scientometrics , volume=

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.497340Z digest=sha256:69bcd2f7905c0890ed3e4f6fbbf7b1c474232a4f324a64c9069c10783fd62018

Observation 06b8d714-d5f1-40f4-aabe-b65160d11e62 · outbound

This paper cites ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.592032Z digest=sha256:f4fa0f671c4246af8bac2350c1e9c20b96ab6b4cf4b2fb17b2115435144fe1ac

Observation 7b2e4ab8-f058-4f91-b414-8188302a566a · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.689782Z digest=sha256:881d00e512e10481f1998936ed1c7586479ab2bce5df6cc0e67a906383b84d54

Observation b8fdf81d-baff-413d-9ea8-afd54faf37b0 · outbound

This paper cites 2020 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2020 , eprint=

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.768931Z digest=sha256:de860198b383df8a378d4e586435d0c4c114d542b79803d2f67c12eb1bd9bddf

Observation cdc0819f-9030-43a4-8419-1b7e6bfce616 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.852005Z digest=sha256:39dc80b08ae7fc31bd0e91cd71e5bcaebd68f5db6f2ab54c23cf96e76b41f414

Observation 4c517e97-f21a-402e-ac1a-b67584e792b6 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:27.950203Z digest=sha256:a19c437b7431b520143a6829d8074bfa5fecf993188e1483d72ec6f41d7a0c12

Observation 88a74259-182e-4420-b07e-1871cc35b76d · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation , pages =

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.017291Z digest=sha256:1dc9151fa4210895fa9a7e815548e5f039c4dc2ef35e4c449f7dc2b04b7c14fd

Observation 510e1560-dec0-4b0c-b852-900e5606af50 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.084455Z digest=sha256:87421ca576d1a0770f7532f5865d5d89c87620255a2f03851cdbca8749825c3c

Observation 424146ee-b0ea-4c87-8e86-7d4c02411234 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.160767Z digest=sha256:7e124c29ded23e87f017a72cabbe5368c865e2c589754710f0a0c695ac418b00

Observation d4621ba5-f5ea-463d-a14e-b00a277bb5b8 · outbound

This paper cites Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work , articleno =

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.227216Z digest=sha256:63e76219c7f5ca6d01773d54492121038a592e59c04b6761a06ae2f09acd78a1

Observation c0fe434d-bc41-4d11-b1ff-6cbb50c66a9e · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.337936Z digest=sha256:912c1e47eaea659c8c5aaf72489e6b0ebe50bb076f05e73c5278ff8643f2ef4a

Observation d4f0ced2-e864-4036-85ec-333106b71273 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.405857Z digest=sha256:93e5c9157ebee09fd8b46f1a7ca1b72405ec721a90b9188e7da9485bd05c5d9f

Observation c0e69f67-88a1-467f-a933-919543d11566 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 28

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.469618Z digest=sha256:baf2a9f2eeb236b809ceed4bfd08c183f26e95afb420ae2d878a952ef10ffc4c

Observation 1c0740d2-13e7-4bd7-8d6d-f73de55bf546 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 29

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.542924Z digest=sha256:f5cb962e29d4663bbdaac87904e2545455f738865bcffce3a87c896b8ca1edf4

Observation 367ddb12-929c-48f7-92c4-84ee8da3871d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.610284Z digest=sha256:3278dea64e9195e20ff351a0369208311664418de11c72cf570a1029acc6f447

Observation 201d7f7a-574f-4cd3-bbbe-0f76523a25db · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , eprint=

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.701399Z digest=sha256:07feaab1124847a3563761d48a4fdd2a50908c58f26e419ee585a3f33b9475b0

Observation 88dd7e9c-e8f5-4d27-87fb-53f7422f6697 · outbound

This paper cites 2025 , journal =.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review 2025 , journal =

Reference 32

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.786083Z digest=sha256:04160575913616501c72e0725e5f2f9b2847008ee1946238d9c83b1f07b6e4bc

Observation fe10538f-a9ed-4cf3-920f-0a37c91fbd55 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen3 Technical Report.

Evaluating the Impact of Reviewer Guideline Design on LLM-Based Automated Peer Review Qwen3 Technical Report

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-02T13:54:28.882362Z digest=sha256:c59499023a388752808d5f218b0a054537aa12b2523a4daf9fde035fdcced746

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.