Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 50 references

Memory Effect for deformed gravitational waves

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that squeezing a smooth gravitational wave packet into an impulsive, delta-function burst destroys the displacement memory effect, leaving only velocity memory; displacement memory can be restored for finite squeezing only

desk verdict Correct but modest: the central no-DM-for-impulsive claim holds up, though much of the content is repackaged PT/Podolsky and the one new example rests on fitted numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25452 v1 pith:MZSM3WIH submitted 2026-07-28 gr-qc hep-th

P.-M. Zhang , M. Elbistan , P. A. Horvathy This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords gravitationalwavememorydisplacementvelocityimpulsivePöschl-Tellerprofilesandwichgeodesicequationchronoprojectivesymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether displacement memory—the permanent shift in separation that a passing gravitational wave can imprint on freely falling test particles—survives when a smooth wave packet is squeezed to an impulsive, delta-function-like burst. The authors show it does not: squeezing a Pöschl-Teller profile whose amplitude is tuned to produce pure displacement memory yields, in the impulsive limit, only the older velocity memory effect, a residual constant relative velocity. Displacement memory can be restored for any finite amount of squeezing by increasing the wave's amplitude, but the required amplitude grows without bound as the squeezing becomes extreme, so the limiting wave is not impulsive. The conclusion is that a finite-amplitude impulsive gravitational wave can only produce velocity kicks, never a permanent displacement.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on the geodesic equation d²X/dU² + A(U)X = 0, a linear second-order equation of Sturm-Liouville type, which is the zero-energy limit of a quantum bound-state problem. Displacement memory corresponds to solutions that return to a constant as U tends to +∞, which occur only for special 'magic' amplitudes. Squeezing the profile rescales the independent variable U to pU; keeping the amplitude fixed leaves the area constant and yields only velocity memory, while restoring displacement memory requires an amplitude that grows like p, which makes the profile's area diverge. A second family of profiles (powers of hyperbolic secant) gives the same conclusion with amplitudes growing

What would settle it

Exhibit a family of smooth wave profiles with uniformly bounded total area that converge to a Dirac delta and whose test-particle solutions satisfy X(+∞) ≠ X(-∞). The paper predicts no such family exists; finding one would refute the claim that impulsive waves cannot produce displacement memory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that no finite-amplitude impulsive gravitational wave supports displacement memory. Starting from a Pöschl-Teller profile A(U)=k/(2 cosh² U) with the 'magic' amplitude k=2m(m+1), which produces exact displacement memory, the authors squeeze it by rescaling U to pU while keeping the amplitude fixed. As p tends to infinity the profile approaches a Dirac delta, but the resulting geodesics are all of the velocity-memory type, with final slope proportional to the amplitude. To restore displacement memory for a fixed p, the amplitude must be increased to k_p=2m(m+1)p; then the area under the profile is m(m+1)p, which diverges as p tends to infinity, violating the norma

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that the impulsive limit supports only velocity memory rests on the standard junction condition that test-particle trajectories remain continuous across the delta-function wave; if a discontinuous or differently regularized junction were allowed, a displacement component could in principle survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observations modeled with impulsive wave approximations will see only velocity memory; any detection of displacement memory requires a wave packet of finite width.
  • The 'magic' amplitudes that produce displacement memory in smooth profiles have no finite impulsive counterpart, so the displacement effect cannot be recovered as a limiting case of the velocity effect.
  • The loss of displacement memory in the impulsive limit is universal across different smooth families that converge to the same delta profile, confirming the profile-independence of the velocity-memory-only outcome.
  • Any realistic gravitational wave memory experiment targeting permanent displacement must account for the finite duration of the wave burst; the zero-width idealization is singular from the memory perspective.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the no-displacement-memory result extends to all smooth profiles converging to a delta, then searches for displacement memory should target finite-duration bursts rather than idealized impulsive signals; the zero-width limit is singular from the memory perspective.
  • The diverging amplitude required to maintain displacement memory suggests a conservation-like obstruction: displacement memory carries an 'integrated strength' that must grow as the duration shrinks, so a fixed-energy burst cannot imprint a permanent displacement.
  • The rescaling that turns a displacement-memory profile into a velocity-memory profile is interpreted in the paper as a chronoprojective symmetry; a testable extension would be to look for the same memory-type change in analogue systems (e.g., optical or acoustic pulses) where the profile width can be tuned independently.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies the memory effect for deformed sandwich gravitational waves in the Eisenhart-Duval framework. Starting from the Pöschl-Teller profile with the known 'magic' displacement-memory (DM) amplitudes k=2m(m+1), the authors consider the squeezed family A_p(U)=k p/(2 cosh^2(pU)) and claim that, for fixed amplitude, the p→∞ limit is an impulsive wave supporting only velocity memory (VM). They then show that DM can be restored for each fixed p by choosing k_p=2m(m+1)p, but that the integrated profile area then diverges as p→∞, so that no genuine impulsive wave is obtained. A second family of profiles, based on powers of sech, is treated numerically and exhibits the same dichotomy. The paper also contains a discussion of UV scaling and chronoprojective symmetries.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a clean and somewhat counterintuitive point: within the Pöschl-Teller deformation family, a finite-amplitude impulsive limit cannot support displacement memory; restoring DM forces the integrated profile strength to diverge. The scaling argument in §IV is exact, simple, and directly connects the deformation parameter p to the magic-amplitude condition k_p=2m(m+1)p. The paper also places this result in the context of Podolsky's and Steinbauer's earlier work on impulsive limits, which strengthens its significance. The main caveat is that the supporting numerical analysis in §V is under-documented; however, the central PT-based conclusion is analytically robust.

minor comments (7)
  1. [III, Eq. (III.1)] The impulsive profile is written as A∞(U)=k δ(0); it should be k δ(U). As printed, δ(0) is a number, not a distribution in U, and the equation is dimensionally inconsistent with the later use.
  2. [IV, Eq. (IV.8)] The area integral is off by a factor of 2: ∫ du / cosh^2(pu)=2/p, so ∫ Ã_p dU = 2m(m+1)p, not m(m+1)p. The divergence conclusion is unaffected, but the displayed value should be corrected.
  3. [V, Eqs. (V.5)-(V.6)] The magic amplitudes k̂_r are reported as numerically fitted values without error estimates, tolerance, or algorithm, and the method is deferred to the unpublished reference [21]. Since the asymptotic fit k̂_r≈4.7√r is used to argue that this family has no impulsive DM limit, please provide reproducibility details (code or at least a description of the root-finding and convergence criterion).
  4. [III, after (III.2)] The claim that the p→∞ limit of (II.5) at fixed k yields the VM solution (III.2) is asserted and illustrated numerically rather than derived. A short analytic justification (e.g., rescaling U→pU and noting that the physical slope dX/dU remains finite while the rescaled potential strength k/p→0) would make the paper self-contained.
  5. [VI] The discussion of UV scaling and chronoprojective structures is interesting but appears disconnected from the memory-effect claim. Please clarify how it supports the main argument or shorten it.
  6. [General] Several places defer essential details to the unpublished lecture notes [21] ('main results' of Sec. V, classification for non-integer m). Please make the present manuscript self-contained for the claims made here.
  7. [General] Typos and notation: 'squeezeing' (III), 'violing' (IV.8), 'rˆole' (V.6), and the unclosed bracket in Eq. (V.6) should be corrected.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central PT-area argument is analytic and self-contained; only the supporting δ_r magic amplitudes are numerical fits, so circularity is minor.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V, Eqs. (V.5)–(V.6)]
    "DM behaviour is recovered by trading the constant amplitude k for “magic” parameters [6]. For DM with m = 1 wave number, we found, k̂2 = 6.1628, k̂3 = 7.77185, k̂10 = 14.7834, k̂20 = 21.0906, . . . (V.5) ... Thus the area integral [Area_r = ∫ k̂_r δ_r = k̂_r ...] For m=1, k̂_r ≈ 4.7√r which diverges confirming the impulsive character."

    Because δ_r is normalized so that its integral is 1, Eq. (V.6) makes the area equal to the fitted amplitude k̂_r by construction. The statement that the area diverges is therefore a restatement of the numerically fitted magic amplitudes, not an independent derivation. Those amplitudes were themselves fitted to produce DM, so this supporting example does not independently confirm the no-impulsive-DM conclusion; it only mirrors the fitted input. The main PT argument (IV.5)–(IV.8) is analytic and unaffected.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. The key claim — that squeezing the fixed-amplitude Pöschl–Teller profile gives only velocity memory, while restoring displacement memory forces k_p = 2m(m+1)p and hence divergent area — follows from an exact substitution U → pU into the zero-energy Schrödinger/Sturm-Liouville equation and the standard δ-limit. No quantity is fitted in this part: Eq. (IV.5) is a rescaling of the known PT magic amplitudes, and Eq. (IV.8) is a direct integral. The continuity/junction condition in Eq. (III.2) is explicitly stated as an assumption and matches the external results of Podolsky and Steinbauer cited in [14–16], so it is not a hidden self-citation. The citations to the authors' own prior work [5,8] for PT magic values are not load-bearing in a circular way because the PT bound-state condition is a standard, independently checkable mathematical fact. The only genuinely weak spot is Sec. V: the δ_r magic amplitudes in (V.5) are numerical fits, and Eq. (V.6) then identifies the area with those fitted amplitudes by construction, making the 'diverging area' claim a tautology of the fit rather than a new prediction. The section also defers details to the authors' unpublished [21], a self-citation carrying missing proof. These issues affect a supporting example, not the abstract's central conclusion, which remains analytically self-contained. Overall circularity is therefore minor: score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced: there are no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The free parameters are the magic amplitudes chosen or fitted to produce DM; the central PT claim does not depend on the fitted δ_r values, but the second example does.

free parameters (5)
  • k_p (magic amplitude, squeezed PT) = k_p = 2m(m+1)p
    Chosen so that after rescaling U→pU the profile has the known DM amplitude; it controls the divergence in (IV.8).
  • m (wave number) = positive integer
    Labels the n-th DM bound state; not fitted to data, but a free discrete parameter in the construction.
  • p (deformation/squeezing parameter) = p > 0 real
    Width of the squeezed profile; the central limit p→∞ is the impulsive limit studied in §III–IV.
  • k̂_r (magic amplitudes for δ_r profile) = k̂_2=6.1628, k̂_3=7.77185, k̂_10=14.7834, k̂_20=21.0906
    Numerically fitted so that X(+∞)=X(-∞) (DM) for m=1; no error bars or convergence criteria are given.
  • constant ≈4.7 in k̂_r ≈ 4.7√r = ≈4.7
    Empirical fit to the four k̂_r values, used to show that the area diverges for large r in (V.6).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The geodesic equation (II.3) with the E-D metric (II.1) and initial conditions (II.2) determines the memory effect for test particles.
    The whole analysis is carried out in the Eisenhart–Duval/Bargmann reduction; stated in §II.
  • domain assumption DM is defined by X(+∞)=const and VM by constant nonzero velocity; magic amplitudes make solutions (non-normalizable) bound states.
    Taxonomy imported from [5,8]; used in §II and (IV.7).
  • domain assumption The impulsive profile A∞=kδ(U) is integrated against geodesics with X continuous at U=0 but slope jump allowed.
    Used to derive (III.2); the continuity condition is explicitly stated in footnote 3.
  • standard math δ_r(U) → δ(U) in tempered distributions as r→∞.
    Needed for the second example in §V; supported by the Gaussian approximation (V.4).
  • standard math For A=m(m+1)/cosh²U, the solution is a Legendre polynomial with X(+∞)=(-1)^m X(-∞).
    The known PT bound-state fact behind (IV.7), from [5,14].
  • domain assumption The UV rescaling (U,V,X)→(pU,p^{-1}V,X) is an isometry of the chronoprojective extension, not of the Bargmann group.
    Used in §VI to interpret (IV.3); referenced to [34–38].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Memory Effect for deformed gravitational waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MZSM3WIH

@misc{pith2026260725452,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Memory Effect for deformed gravitational waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MZSM3WIH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25452}
}
abstract

Deformations of sandwich gravitational waves are considered. Squeezing a wave with pure displacement (DM) parameters to an impulsive wave, the DM property is lost, leaving us with the velocity effect (VM). For each fixed value of the deformation parameter $p$, DM can be restored by further increasing the amplitude which however diverge when $p\to\infty$, and no impulsive wave is obtained.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25452 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Forr= 1 we have Γ(3/2)/Γ(1) = √π/2 and we recover the initial P¨ oschl - Teller solutions in [5]

    The regularised kernels δr(U) = 1√π Γ(r+ 1 2 ) Γ(r) 1 cosh2r U verifylim r→∞ δr(U) =δ(U) (V.2) in the sense of tempered distributions. Forr= 1 we have Γ(3/2)/Γ(1) = √π/2 and we recover the initial P¨ oschl - Teller solutions in [5]. The area below the profile can be calculated analytically [31]. The result is consistent with (III.1). 7 -4 -2 2 4 -1.0 -0.5...

  2. [2]

    (V.3) Thus the profiles decays exponentially

    Developing Γ(r+ 1/2)/Γ(r) for larger, we get approximately δr(U)∼ 1√π 1 cosh2r U √r 1− 1 8r +. . . .(V.3) Thus the profiles decays exponentially

  3. [3]

    Near the origin, we recover the Gaussian profile δr(U)≈ r r π exp −r U2 .(V.4)

  4. [4]

    DM behaviour is recovered by trading the constant amplitudekfor “magic” parameters [6]

    The geodesic equations can be solved numerically by following our strategy proposed in [6]. DM behaviour is recovered by trading the constant amplitudekfor “magic” parameters [6]. For DM withm= 1 wave number, we found, ˆk2 = 6.1628, ˆk3 = 7.77185, ˆk10 = 14.7834, ˆk20 = 21.0906, . . .(V.5) illustrated in FIG.7, to be compared with the PT values (IV.5). Fo...

  5. [5]

    Its lift is a geodesic for the metric ˜gp =dX 2 + 2dU dV+p 2A(p U)X2dU 2.(VI.4)

    On a harmonic oscillator,A(U) = const, the typical solutionX p=1(U) = cos(U) is taken intoX p(U) = cos(p U) by and UV boost. Its lift is a geodesic for the metric ˜gp =dX 2 + 2dU dV+p 2A(p U)X2dU 2.(VI.4)

  6. [6]

    The trajectory is distorted however remains a DM geodesic, as we have seen in sect.IV

    For the PT profile (II.4), DM solutionsX p=1(U) are taken toX(p U). The trajectory is distorted however remains a DM geodesic, as we have seen in sect.IV

  7. [7]

    smooth asymptotic sandwich wave

    UV-boosts are symmetries for the singular potential A(U) = a U 2 , a= const.(VI.5) [10, 38–42] : the profile is plainly invariant under the time rescalingU→p U. VII. CONCLUSION For general parameters, gravitational waves exhibit the Velocity Effect [1–3]. However for certain “magic” values of the amplitude they may support the Displacement Effect [4]. In ...

  8. [8]

    Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects,

    V. B. Braginsky and K. S. Thorne, “Gravitational-wave bursts with memory and experimental prospects,” Nature327(1987), 123-125 doi:10.1038/327123a0

    doi:10.1038/327123a0 1987

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    The gravitational-wave memory effect,

    M. Favata, “The gravitational-wave memory effect,” Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010), 084036 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/8/084036 [arXiv:1003.3486 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Exact solutions of the gravitational field equations,

    J. Ehlers and W. Kundt, “Exact solutions of the gravitational field equations,” (1962) 4 DM trajectories are in fact plotted in FIG.1 of [14]. Their repulsive components diverge, though, and are therefore discarded. In [5] they are called “half DM”. 11

    1962

  3. [11]

    Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, “Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,” Astron. Zh.51, 30 (1974) [Sov. Astron.1817 (1974)]

    1974

  4. [12]

    Displacement within velocity effect in gravitational wave memory,

    P. M. Zhang and P. A. Horvathy, “Displacement within velocity effect in gravitational wave memory,” Annals of Physics470(2024) 169784 [arXiv:2405.12928 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Approxi- mate Models for Gravitational Memory,

    Q. L. Zhao, P. M. Zhang, M. Elbistan and P. A. Horvathy, “Approxi- mate Models for Gravitational Memory,” Phys. Lett. B 879 140603 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140603 [arXiv:2603.15442 [gr-qc]]

    2024

  6. [14]

    Displacement versus velocity memory effects from a gravitational plane wave,

    J. Ben Achour and J. P. Uzan, “Displacement versus velocity memory effects from a gravitational plane wave,” JCAP08(2024), 004 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/004 [arXiv:2406.07106 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Displacement memory for flyby,

    P. M. Zhang, Q. L. Zhao, J. Balog and P. A. Horvathy, “Displacement memory for flyby,” Annals Phys.473(2025), 169890 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169890 [arXiv:2407.10787 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  8. [16]

    Flyby-induced displacement: analytic solu- tion,

    P. M. Zhang, Z. K. Silagadze and P. A. Horvathy, “Flyby-induced displacement: analytic solu- tion,” Phys. Lett. B868(2025), 139687 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139687 [arXiv:2502.01326 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  9. [17]

    Gravitational wave mem- ory: Further examples,

    Q. L. Zhao, P. M. Zhang, M. Elbistan and P. A. Horvathy, “Gravitational wave mem- ory: Further examples,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.23(2026) no.06, 2540019 doi:10.1142/S0219887825400195 [arXiv:2412.02705 [gr-qc]]

    2026 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Plane Gravitational Waves, the Kinetic Energy of Free Particles and the Memory Effect,

    J. W. Maluf, J. F. Da Rocha-Neto, S. C. Ulhoa and F. L. Carneiro, “Plane Gravitational Waves, the Kinetic Energy of Free Particles and the Memory Effect,” Grav. Cosmol.24 (2018) no.3, 261-266 doi:10.1134/S020228931803009X [arXiv:1707.06874 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Memory effect for generalized modes in pp-waves spacetime,

    F. L. Carneiro, H. P. de Carvalho, M. P. Lobo and L. A. Cabral, “Memory effect for generalized modes in pp-waves spacetime,” [arXiv:2603.27042 [gr-qc]]

  12. [20]

    On the geometry of impulsive gravitational waves,

    R. Steinbauer, “On the geometry of impulsive gravitational waves,” [arXiv:gr-qc/9809054 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Smooth sandwich gravitational waves,

    J. Podolsky, “Smooth sandwich gravitational waves,” Czech. J. Phys.49(1999), 981-984 doi:10.1023/A:1021433204211 [arXiv:gr-qc/9805098 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  14. [22]

    New examples of sandwich gravitational waves and their impulsive limit,

    J. Podolsky and K. Vesely, “New examples of sandwich gravitational waves and their impulsive limit,” Czech. J. Phys.48(1998), 871-878 doi:10.1023/A:1022869004605 [arXiv:gr-qc/9801054 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Geodesics and geodesic deviation for impulsive gravitational waves,

    R. Steinbauer, “Geodesics and geodesic deviation for impulsive gravitational waves,” J. Math. 12 Phys.39(1998), 2201-2212 doi:10.1063/1.532283 [arXiv:gr-qc/9710119 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Nonexpanding impulsive gravitational waves,

    J. Podolsky, “Nonexpanding impulsive gravitational waves,” Class. Quant. Grav.15(1998), 3229-3239 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/023 [arXiv:gr-qc/9807081 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Penrose junction conditions extended: impulsive waves with gyratons,

    J. Podolsky, R. Svarc, R. Steinbauer and C. S¨ amann, “Penrose junction conditions extended: impulsive waves with gyratons,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no.6, 064043 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064043 [arXiv:1704.08570 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Memory effect for impulsive gravitational waves,

    P. M. Zhang, C. Duval and P. A. Horvathy, “Memory effect for impulsive gravitational waves,” Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) no.6, 065011 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aaa987 [arXiv:1709.02299 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    The memory effect in impulsive plane waves: comments, corrections, clarifications,

    R. Steinbauer, “The memory effect in impulsive plane waves: comments, corrections, clarifications,” Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) no.9, 098001 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab127d [arXiv:1811.10940 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Carroll Memory

    P. M. Zhang, M. Elbistan, and P. Horvathy, “Carroll Memory”. Lectures given in 2025-26 at SYSU University Zhuhai, (China) and in Istanbul (Turkey), to be published in Physics Reports

    2025

  21. [29]

    Dynamical trajectories and geodesics

    L. P. Eisenhart, “Dynamical trajectories and geodesics”, Annals Math.30591-606 (1928)

    1928

  22. [30]

    Bargmann Structures and Newton-Cartan Theory,

    C. Duval, G. Burdet, H. P. Kunzle and M. Perrin, “Bargmann Structures and Newton-Cartan Theory,” Phys. Rev. D31(1985), 1841-1853 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1841

    1985 doi

  23. [31]

    Celestial mechanics, conformal structures and gravitational waves,

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. Horvathy, “Celestial mechanics, conformal structures and gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D43(1991), 3907-3922 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3907 [arXiv:hep-th/0512188 [hep-th]]

    1991 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Memory effect & Carroll symmetry, 50 years later,

    M. Elbistan, P. M. Zhang and P. A. Horvathy, “Memory effect & Carroll symmetry, 50 years later,” Annals Phys.459(2023), 169535 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2023.169535 [arXiv:2306.14271 [gr- qc]]

    2023

  25. [33]

    Globally defined Carroll symmetry of gravitational waves,

    M. Elbistan, P. M. Zhang and P. Horvathy, “Globally defined Carroll symmetry of gravitational waves,” [arXiv:2510.16762 [gr-qc]]. Nucl. Phys. B1024(2026), 117354 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117354 [arXiv:2510.16762 [gr-qc]]

    2026

  26. [34]

    A simple analytic example of the gravitational wave mem- ory effect,

    I. Chakraborty and S. Kar, “A simple analytic example of the gravitational wave mem- ory effect,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022) no.4, 418 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02593-y [arXiv:2202.10661 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszilla- 13 tors,

    G. P¨ oschl and E. Teller, “Bemerkungen zur Quantenmechanik des anharmonischen Oszilla- 13 tors,” Z. Phys.83(1933), 143-151 doi:10.1007/BF01331132

    1933 doi

  28. [36]

    Supersymmetry in quantum mechanics,

    A. Khare, “Supersymmetry in quantum mechanics,” AIP Conf. Proc.744(2004) no.1, 133-165 doi:10.1063/1.1853201 [arXiv:math-ph/0409003 [math-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Displacement memory effect from super- symmetry,

    E. Catak, M. Elbistan and M. Mullahasanoglu, “Displacement memory effect from super- symmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025) no.6, 540 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06516-5 [arXiv:2504.05043 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Dover Publications (1964)

    1964

  31. [39]

    Ondes et radiations gravitationnelles,

    J-M. Souriau, “Ondes et radiations gravitationnelles,” Colloques Internationaux du CNRS No 220, pp. 243-256. Paris (1973)

    1973

  32. [40]

    Carroll symmetry of plane grav- itational waves,

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, P. A. Horvathy and P. M. Zhang, “Carroll symmetry of plane grav- itational waves,” Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no.17, 175003 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa7f62 [arXiv:1702.08284 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    CARTAN STRUCTURES ON GALILEAN MAN- IFOLDS: THE CHRONOPROJECTIVE GEOMETRY,

    G. Burdet, C. Duval and M. Perrin, “CARTAN STRUCTURES ON GALILEAN MAN- IFOLDS: THE CHRONOPROJECTIVE GEOMETRY,” J. Math. Phys.24(1983), 1752 doi:10.1063/1.525927

    1983 doi

  34. [42]

    Nouvelles sym´ etries de la m´ ecanique Newtonienne,

    C. Duval, “Nouvelles sym´ etries de la m´ ecanique Newtonienne,” (th` ese de doctorat d’´ etat, Marseille (1982)

    1982

  35. [43]

    Time Dependent Quantum Systems and Chronoprojec- tive Geometry,

    G. Burdet, C. Duval and M. Perrin, “Time Dependent Quantum Systems and Chronoprojec- tive Geometry,” Lett. Math. Phys.10(1985), 255-262 doi:10.1007/BF00420564

    1985 doi

  36. [44]

    Chrono-projective Invariance of the Five-dimensional Schr¨ odinger Formalism,

    M. Perrin, G. Burdet and C. Duval, “Chrono-projective Invariance of the Five-dimensional Schr¨ odinger Formalism,” Class. Quant. Grav.3(1986) 461. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/3/3/020

    1986 doi

  37. [45]

    Scaling and conformal symmetries for plane gravitational waves,

    P. M. Zhang, M. Cariglia, M. Elbistan and P. A. Horvathy, “Scaling and conformal symmetries for plane gravitational waves,” J. Math. Phys.61(2020) no.2, 022502 doi:10.1063/1.5136078 [arXiv:1905.08661 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Decay criteria for asymptotic freedom in plane gravitational waves,

    Q. L. Zhao and L. M. Cao, “Decay criteria for asymptotic freedom in plane gravitational waves,” Phys. Lett.B 880(2026) 140783 [arXiv:2605.29636 [gr-qc]]

    2026 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Memory effect, conformal symmetry and gravita- tional plane waves,

    K. Andrzejewski and S. Prencel, “Memory effect, conformal symmetry and gravita- tional plane waves,” Phys. Lett. B782(2018), 421-426 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.05.072 [arXiv:1804.10979 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Niederer’s transformation, time-dependent oscillators and 14 polarized gravitational waves,

    K. Andrzejewski and S. Prencel, “Niederer’s transformation, time-dependent oscillators and 14 polarized gravitational waves,” doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2394 [arXiv:1810.06541 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Screw-symmetric gravitational waves: a double copy of the vortex,

    A. Ilderton, “Screw-symmetric gravitational waves: a double copy of the vortex,” Phys. Lett. B782(2018) 22 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.069 [arXiv:1804.07290 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A possible Large-scale Anisotropy of the Universe,

    H. H. Fliche, J. M. Souriau, R. Triay, “ A possible Large-scale Anisotropy of the Universe,” Astron. Astrophys.108, 256 (1982) 15

    1982

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.