Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 46 references

A two-dimensional piezo-optomechanical transducer

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces a 2D piezo-optomechanical transducer whose collective mechanical modes are engineered via a Γ-potential, demonstrating bidirectional microwave-optical transduction at 0.85% internal efficiency and near-ground-state pho

desk verdict Real first 2D piezo-optomechanical transducer with a genuinely new design concept, but the headline efficiency number is not independently checkable as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26161 v1 pith:3QV3OWMU submitted 2026-07-28 quant-ph

Tian Xie , Nelson Ooi , Linus Woodard , Sultan Malik , Felix Mayor , Oliver A. Hitchcock , André G. Primo , Wentao Jiang
show 2 more authors
Samuel Gyger Amir H. Safavi-Naeini
This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords piezo-optomechanicsmicrowave-to-opticaltransduction2Doptomechanicalcrystalbandstructureengineeringlithiumniobatequantumphoton-phononpairs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to solve a bottleneck in microwave-to-optical quantum conversion: one-dimensional transducers heat up under optical pumping, while two-dimensional optomechanical crystals have better thermal anchoring but no practical electromechanical interface. The authors propose building the interface into the mechanical band structure itself: by spatially varying the Γ-point frequency of the breathing mode, they create an effective potential that binds collective mechanical modes extending from the optical cavity to a piezoelectric element. They fabricate such devices and report bidirectional transduction with 0.85% internal efficiency and pulsed photon-phonon pair generation with a mechanical occupation of 0.41, near the quantum ground state. If the approach works as claimed, it would make 2D optomechanical crystals a viable low-noise, high-repetition-rate platform for linking superconducting quantum processors over optical fibers.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Γ-potential: a quadratic spatial variation of the Γ-point frequency of the mechanical breathing-mode band across the 2D optomechanical crystal. Because the band has vanishing group velocity at the Γ point, the slowly varying envelope of a collective mode obeys a Schrödinger-like equation with this potential as the effective potential, producing a ladder of discrete extended modes—analogous to harmonic-oscillator bound states. The Γ-potential does the design work: it creates modes that span both the optical defect and the lithium niobate piezoelectric block, giving simultaneous large optomechanical and electromechanical coupling without relying on fragile frequency m

What would settle it

Fabricate a set of transducers with controlled random perturbations in unit-cell geometry (e.g., ±5 nm in blade width) and measure the device-to-device scatter in electromechanical damping rate and internal conversion efficiency; if the scatter is comparable to the ~30 MHz mode spacing or larger than the claimed tolerance, the disorder-tolerance premise is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spatially graded mechanical band edge—the Γ-potential—lets one directly engineer collective mechanical modes that couple strongly to both an optical cavity and a piezoelectric actuator, eliminating the need to frequency-match separate defect, link, and piezoelectric resonators. Using this strategy in a fully integrated thin-film silicon/lithium niobate device, the authors measure an electromechanical damping rate of 4.6 kHz at room temperature, an electromechanical coupling rate of 0.17 MHz when wire-bonded to a multimode microwave resonator at 10 mK, and calibrated bidirectional microwave-optical conversion with 0.85% internal efficiency. They also observe pulsed

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the collective Γ-potential modes are inherently tolerant to fabrication disorder; the paper presents this as an advantage but supplies no direct statistical or simulation evidence for it, and if disorder shifts the local band by more than the mode spacing, the interface would degrade like the frequency-matching approach it replaces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • 2D optomechanical crystals can serve as integrated, thermally anchored piezo-optomechanical transducers, solving the heating problem that limits 1D nanobeam devices.
  • The collective-mode design should tolerate moderate fabrication disorder without destroying the electromechanical interface, since the mode is a property of the whole structure.
  • The sub-unity mechanical occupation of 0.41 under pulsed operation indicates the transducer can operate near the quantum ground state, a prerequisite for microwave-optical entanglement.
  • With a higher-impedance, co-integrated microwave resonator (replacing the wirebond interface), the authors expect electromechanical coupling in the 10 MHz range, bringing the 2D platform to parity with 1D transducers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The disorder-tolerance argument is stated but not demonstrated; a natural test would be to fabricate a batch of devices with intentional unit-cell perturbations and measure the variance of conversion efficiency.
  • The same Γ-potential concept might apply to other 2D phononic platforms or to coupling optical modes to other degrees of freedom, such as spin or charge, not just piezoelectric actuation.
  • The near-ground-state pair generation at 8.4 kHz, combined with better microwave matching, suggests a realistic path to remote entanglement experiments, but the current wirebond packaging adds parasitic capacitance that would need to be engineered away.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a two-dimensional piezo-optomechanical transducer whose design uses a spatially graded 'Γ-potential' to create collective mechanical modes extending from an optical cavity to a piezoelectric element. The authors present finite-element simulations, room-temperature characterization of OMC-only and full-transducer devices, and cryogenic measurements after wire-bonding the device to a tunable microwave resonator. The central quantitative claims are a bidirectional internal transduction efficiency of 0.85% in continuous-wave operation and pulsed photon-phonon pair generation with a transient mechanical occupation of n_m = 0.41. The paper argues that this collective-mode strategy avoids the fragile frequency matching of 1D transducers and is inherently tolerant to fabrication disorder.

Significance. If the results hold, this would be a notable advance: it is the first fully integrated 2D piezo-optomechanical transducer, and the measured g_om values agree with finite-element simulation. The design concept of engineering a collective mechanical mode is elegant and could be a useful route for thermal management in quantum transducers. The paper also includes consistent room-temperature and cryogenic electromechanical characterization, a realistic fabrication flow, and a pulsed pair-generation measurement suggesting sub-unity phonon occupation. However, the headline efficiency of 0.85% is not reproducible from the presented material, and the claimed fabrication-disorder tolerance is asserted rather than demonstrated. With the missing calibration details supplied and the efficiency/factor-of-four definitions clarified, this could become a strong contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [SM §III.B (Fridge setup)] The calibration-free efficiency extraction is reported in a single sentence: measuring Soo=−9.6 dB, Soe=−35.3 dB, Seo=−79.6 dB, See=−49.8 dB and an optical kappa ratio of 19.5% gives η_int=0.85%. No formula or derivation is given. The two through S-parameters differ by 44 dB, while a passive reciprocal transducer should have direction-independent internal conversion. The extraction must state how optical and microwave path gains are separated, how the κ ratio sets the absolute scale, and whether the path gains are assumed reciprocal. Without this, the headline 0.85% and the 'bidirectional' claim cannot be independently checked. Please provide the full formula, a sample calculation, and an uncertainty estimate.
  2. [SM §III.C (Calibration of room-temperature electromechanical conversion efficiency)] Equation (S15) defines η_em = γ_em/γ_m and calls it the 'microwave-to-mechanics conversion efficiency.' This is the electromechanical cooperativity, not a conversion efficiency. For a waveguide coupled to a lossy mechanical cavity at resonance, the conversion efficiency is proportional to 4γ_emγ_m/(γ_m+γ_em+...)², reducing to approximately 4γ_em/γ_m when γ_em ≪ γ_m. As written, the quoted η_em = 6.2×10⁻⁴ in Table S2 is ambiguous; it also does not equal γ_em/γ_m for mode 2 (4.6 kHz/6.0 MHz ≈ 7.7×10⁻⁴). Please clarify the definition and correct any factor-of-four error.
  3. [Introduction and Design Strategy] The introduction states that because the collective modes are a property of the structure as a whole, the interface is 'inherently tolerant to fabrication disorder.' Later text appropriately says this design 'has the potential' to provide a robust route. No statistical device-to-device comparison, disorder-perturbation simulation, or tolerance analysis is presented. Since disorder robustness is the stated motivation for abandoning the 1D matched-component approach, this claim should be either supported (e.g., Monte-Carlo geometry perturbations) or explicitly labeled as an untested hypothesis.
  4. [Cryogenic measurement and Fig. 5c] The reported efficiency 'up to 0.85%' is a maximum over frequency, but the plotted curve has no error bars and the selection of the peak is not discussed. The asymmetry in the raw S-parameters (SM §III.B) makes it especially important to show that the O2M and M2O curves are calibrated consistently. Please provide the full calibrated curves with uncertainties and state how the maximum is defined.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table S2] For mode 2, η_em = 6.2×10⁻⁴ does not match γ_em/γ_m = 4.6 kHz/6.0 MHz = 7.7×10⁻⁴. Please check the calculation or the reported values.
  2. [Transducer modelling] The text refers to a 'non-collecitve' mode; this is a typo for 'non-collective'. The mode labeled #X in Fig. 2 is not defined in the caption.
  3. [SM §III.B] The 'optical kappa ratio 19.5%' is never defined. Specify whether it is κ_ex/κ, κ_e,ex/κ_e, or another ratio.
  4. [Data availability] The paper states that data are available upon request. Given that the efficiency extraction is central and currently unreported, depositing the raw S-parameter files and the fitting/efficiency-extraction script with the publication would substantially improve reproducibility.
  5. [Fig. 5d] The annotations '80ns' and '~6us' are not clearly tied to the relevant traces. Please label the pulse duration and repetition interval explicitly in the caption or figure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Γ-potential design is validated against independent FEM and measured mode couplings; the efficiency claim uses an external calibration-free S-parameter method.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained at the load-bearing points. The Γ-potential collective-mode picture is obtained from a Schrödinger-envelope model with a quadratic Γ-point profile, and its predictions (mode ladder, g_om values, g_em) are checked against finite-element simulation and room-temperature back-action/thermomechanical measurements; none of these target quantities is fitted from the data and then renamed as a prediction. The room-temperature electromechanical efficiency uses a coherent-thermal calibration from an independent optical probe, and the cryogenic internal efficiency (0.85%) is stated to come from a calibration-free four-S-parameter method attributed to Ref. 12, i.e., an external measurement protocol rather than a parameter fitted to the headline result. Same-group citations (Refs. 9, 28) are used as published fabrication/design precursors and benchmarks, not as uniqueness theorems or as the sole justification for the central claim, so they do not make the argument circular. The most serious weaknesses are evidentiary or presentational rather than circular: the disorder-tolerance motivation is explicitly only a potential ('Therefore has the potential to provide a robust route') and is not supported by statistics, and the SM does not display the calibration-free efficiency formula, making the 0.85% number hard to audit. An omitted derivation is a reproducibility gap, not a reduction of the result to its inputs, so no circular step meets the quoted-reduction standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The Γ-potential is an effective description, not a new force or particle. The central experimental claim rests on standard optomechanical theory, design simulations, and calibration assumptions; the main unvalidated elements are the disorder-tolerance claim and the reciprocal-network assumption in the efficiency calibration.

free parameters (2)
  • Unit-cell geometry parameters (w_r, h_r, h_tip) forming the Γ-potential
    Design degrees of freedom, varied cell-by-cell to engineer the mechanical potential. They are hand-selected, not derived from first principles, and define the device geometry.
  • Assumed microwave resonator impedance Z_c = 700 Ω
    Used in Eq. S16 to convert the measured electromechanical damping γ_em into a coupling rate g*_em. The value is chosen as a typical high-impedance resonator design, not independently justified for this measurement.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Slowly-varying envelope approximation: ω(k_m,x) ≈ ω_Γ(x) − α k_m²/2, giving a Schrödinger-like equation for the collective mode envelope
    Invoked in 'Design Strategy' (Fig. 1e-f) to predict the ladder of collective modes. Requires the band curvature α and the potential ω_Γ(x) to vary smoothly over many unit cells.
  • domain assumption Classical thermal occupation at room temperature: n_therm ≈ k_B T / ℏω_m ≈ 900
    Used in Supplementary Eq. S14 to calibrate coherent phonon number from thermomechanical sidebands; valid for GHz modes at T=295 K.
  • domain assumption Linear, reciprocal four-port network for the 'calibration-free' efficiency extraction
    The S-parameter method (after Ref. 12) assumes the transducer is a reciprocal, linear network. The measured S_oe (−35.3 dB) and S_eo (−79.6 dB) differ by ~44 dB, so either the measurement chains are not fully calibrated or the assumption is violated; this directly affects the 0.85% efficiency claim.
  • domain assumption Complete phononic bandgaps in the 2D and 1D shields
    Taken from prior design (Ref. 28); the device assumes these bandgaps confine the coherent phonons and anchor the membrane while blocking heat radiation.
  • domain assumption Coupled-mode theory model for the microwave group-delay fit
    The extracted g_em/2π = 0.17 MHz and γ_m/2π = 310 kHz come from fitting a specific coupled-mode model to the phase/amplitude response; the fit can absorb parasitic effects from wirebonds and the multi-mode resonator.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A two-dimensional piezo-optomechanical transducer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3QV3OWMU

@misc{pith2026260726161,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A two-dimensional piezo-optomechanical transducer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3QV3OWMU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26161}
}
read the original abstract

Optical quantum networks provide a natural route for connecting distant superconducting quantum processors, enabling distributed quantum computation, sensing, and communication. Piezo-optomechanical transducers are among the leading candidates for scalable microwave-to-optical quantum interfaces. However, prior one-dimensional piezo-optomechanical transducers remain limited by optical-absorption-induced heating and the resulting thermal noise. Two-dimensional optomechanical crystals offer substantially improved thermalization from better thermal anchoring, but their structural complexity has so far hindered the realization of a fully integrated two-dimensional transducer. Here, we overcome this challenge with a new design strategy based on band structure engineering. We fabricate the devices and experimentally characterize the response, measuring an electromechanical damping rate of 4.6 kHz at room temperature and electromechanical coupling rate of 0.17 MHz by wire-bonding to a multi-mode microwave resonator at 10 mK. Bidirectional transduction is performed with a calibrated internal efficiency of 0.85\% in the continuous-wave operation, alongside pulsed photon-phonon pair generation near its quantum ground state. Our results represent a significant step toward high-efficiency and low-noise transducers for entangling remote superconducting qubits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26161 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

    Arute, F.et al.Quantum supremacy using a programmable su- perconducting processor.Nature574, 505–510 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

    doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 2019

  2. [2]

    V .et al.Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even.Nature616, 50–55 (2023)

    Sivak, V . V .et al.Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even.Nature616, 50–55 (2023). URLhttp://dx. doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05782-6

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05782-6 2023

  3. [3]

    & Tang, H

    Han, X., Fu, W., Zou, C.-L., Jiang, L. & Tang, H. X. Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion.Optica8, 1050–1064 (2021). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-8-8-1050

    2021

  4. [4]

    J., Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F

    Lambert, N. J., Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F. & Schwefel, H. G. L. Coherent conversion between microwave and optical photons—an overview of physical implementations.Advanced Quantum Technologies3, 1900077 (2020). URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1002/qute.201900077

    doi:10.1002/qute.201900077 2020

  5. [5]

    K.et al.Coherent control of a superconducting qubit using light.Nature Physics21, 831–838 (2025)

    Warner, H. K.et al.Coherent control of a superconducting qubit using light.Nature Physics21, 831–838 (2025). URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02812-0

    doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02812-0 2025

  6. [6]

    M ¨ohl, C.et al.Bidirectional microwave-optical conversion with an integrated soft-ferroelectric barium titanate transducer. Phys. Rev. X15, 041044 (2025). URLhttps://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/1gvf-w6lx

    doi:10.1103/1gvf-w6lx 2025

  7. [7]

    URLhttps://www.science

    Sahu, R.et al.Entangling microwaves with light.Science 380, 718–721 (2023). URLhttps://www.science. org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.adg3812. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adg3812

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adg3812 2023

  8. [8]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41566-023-01370-2

    Shen, M.et al.Photonic link from single-flux-quantum circuits to room temperature.Nature Photonics18, 371–378 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41566-023-01370-2

    2024

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Nature Physics19, 1423–1428 (2023)

    Jiang, W.et al.Optically heralded microwave photon addition. Nature Physics19, 1423–1428 (2023). URLhttps://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-023-02129-w

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    D.et al.Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction.Nature606, 489–493 (2022)

    Delaney, R. D.et al.Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction.Nature606, 489–493 (2022). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04720-2

    2022

  3. [11]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-024-02409-z

    Meesala, S.et al.Non-classical microwave–optical photon pair generation with a chip-scale transducer.Nature Physics 20, 871–877 (2024). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-024-02409-z

    2024

  4. [12]

    D., Kejriwal, A

    Zhao, H., Chen, W. D., Kejriwal, A. & Mirhosseini, M. Quantum-enabled microwave-to-optical transduction via silicon nanomechanics.Nature Nanotechnology20, 602–608 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41565-025-01874-8

    2025

  5. [13]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-05740-2

    Kumar, A.et al.Quantum-enabled millimetre wave to optical transduction using neutral atoms.Nature615, 614–619 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-023-05740-2

    2023

  6. [14]

    & Faraon, A

    Xie, T., Fukumori, R., Li, J. & Faraon, A. Scalable microwave- to-optical transducers at the single-photon level with spins.Na- ture Physics21, 931–937 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-025-02884-y

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    & Doi, Y

    Sekine, A., Murakami, R. & Doi, Y . Microwave-to-optical quantum transduction of photons for quantum interconnects (2026). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26349. 2509.26349

    2026 arXiv

  8. [16]

    M., Vahala, K

    Eichenfield, M., Chan, J., Camacho, R. M., Vahala, K. J. & Painter, O. Optomechanical crystals.Nature462, 78–82 (2009). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08524

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    Meesala, S.et al.Quantum entanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits.Phys. Rev. X14, 031055 (2024). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.031055

    2024

  10. [18]

    & Painter, O

    Mirhosseini, M., Sipahigil, A., Kalaee, M. & Painter, O. Super- conducting qubit to optical photon transduction.Nature588, 599–603 (2020). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-3038-6

    2020

  11. [19]

    & Stockill, R

    Weaver, M., Arnold, G., Weaver, H., Gr¨oblacher, S. & Stockill, R. Scalable quantum computing with optical links.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00542(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    & Jiang, L

    Wang, C.-H., Li, F. & Jiang, L. Quantum capacities of transduc- ers.Nature Communications13, 6698 (2022). URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34373-8

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    Krastanov, S.et al.Optically heralded entanglement of super- conducting systems in quantum networks.Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 040503 (2021). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.040503

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    & Van Laer, R

    Burger, P., Frey, J., Kolvik, J., Hambraeus, D. & Van Laer, R. Design of a release-free piezo-optomechanical quantum trans- ducer.APL Photonics10(2025). URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.1063/5.0246075

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    Kolvik, J.et al.Optomechanical crystal in light-resilient quan- tum ground state.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.15724(2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Burger, P., Frey, J., Kolvik, J., Kristensen, M. B. & van Laer, R. Release-free electro-optomechanical crystal modulator (2026). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05190. 2605.05190

    2026 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Safavi-Naeini, A. H. & Painter, O. Design of optome- chanical cavities and waveguides on a simultaneous bandgap phononic-photonic crystal slab.Opt. Express18, 14926– 14943 (2010). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/oe/ abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-14-14926

    2010

  18. [26]

    URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-020-17182-9

    Ren, H.et al.Two-dimensional optomechanical crystal cav- ity with high quantum cooperativity.Nature Communica- tions11(2020). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-020-17182-9

    2020

  19. [27]

    URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/ abstract.cfm?URI=optica-12-1-99

    Sonar, S.et al.High-efficiency low-noise optomechan- ical crystal photon-phonon transducers.Optica12, 99– 104 (2025). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/ abstract.cfm?URI=optica-12-1-99. 9

    2025

  20. [28]

    M.et al.High photon-phonon pair generation rate in a two-dimensional optomechanical crystal.Nature communica- tions16, 2576 (2025)

    Mayor, F. M.et al.High photon-phonon pair generation rate in a two-dimensional optomechanical crystal.Nature communica- tions16, 2576 (2025). URLhttps://www.nature.com/ articles/s41467-025-57948-7

    2025

  21. [29]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10

    Chen, L.et al.Low-noise optomechanical single phonon- photon conversion for quantum networks.Nature Communi- cations17, 1187 (2026). URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/s41467-025-67956-2

    2026

  22. [30]

    Express31, 22914–22927 (2023)

    Chiappina, P.et al.Design of an ultra-low mode volume piezo-optomechanical quantum transducer.Opt. Express31, 22914–22927 (2023). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/ oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-31-14-22914

    2023

  23. [31]

    N., Sarabalis, C

    Patel, R. N., Sarabalis, C. J., Jiang, W., Hill, J. T. & Safavi-Naeini, A. H. Engineering phonon leakage in nanomechanical resonators.Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 041001 (2017). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.8.041001

    2017

  24. [32]

    Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. S.Quantum optics(Cambridge university press, 1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    Kippenberg, T. J. & Vahala, K. J. Cavity optomechan- ics: Back-action at the mesoscale.Science321, 1172–1176 (2008). URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.1156032

    2008 doi

  26. [34]

    Chan, J.Laser Cooling of an Optomechanical Crys- tal Resonator to Its Quantum Ground State of Mo- tion. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2012). URLhttps://resolver.caltech.edu/ CaltechTHESIS:05302012-124605570

    2012

  27. [35]

    M., Makihara, T

    Malik, S., Jiang, W., Mayor, F. M., Makihara, T. & Safavi- Naeini, A. H. Flexible integration of gigahertz nanomechani- cal resonators with a superconducting microwave resonator us- ing a bonded flip-chip method.Applied Physics Letters123, 104001 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10....

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Koolstra, G.et al.High-impedance resonators for strong cou- pling to an electron on helium.Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 024001 (2025). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.23.024001

    2025

  29. [37]

    Xu, M.et al.Radiative cooling of a superconduct- ing resonator.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 033602 (2020). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.033602. 10 Supplementary Materials I. THEORETICAL MODEL OF PIEZO-OPTOMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS. A. Definitions. ˆa Annihilation ...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Jiang, W.Microwave-optics quantum frequency conversion and optically heralded microwave photons. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    & Tang, H

    Han, X., Fu, W., Zou, C.-L., Jiang, L. & Tang, H. X. Microwave-optical quantum frequency conversion.Optica8, 1050–1064 (2021). URLhttps://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-8-8-1050

    2021

  32. [40]

    M.et al.High photon-phonon pair generation rate in a two-dimensional optomechanical crystal.Nature communications16, 2576 (2025)

    Mayor, F. M.et al.High photon-phonon pair generation rate in a two-dimensional optomechanical crystal.Nature communications16, 2576 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Chan, J.Laser Cooling of an Optomechanical Crystal Resonator to Its Quantum Ground State of Motion. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology (2012). URLhttps://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechTHESIS:05302012-124605570

    2012

  34. [42]

    A.et al.Loss channels affecting lithium niobate phononic crystal resonators at cryogenic temperature.Applied Physics Letters118, 123501 (2021)

    Wollack, E. A.et al.Loss channels affecting lithium niobate phononic crystal resonators at cryogenic temperature.Applied Physics Letters118, 123501 (2021). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0034909

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    D., Sarabalis, C

    Dahmani, Y . D., Sarabalis, C. J., Jiang, W., Mayor, F. M. & Safavi-Naeini, A. H. Piezoelectric transduction of a wavelength-scale me- chanical waveguide.Phys. Rev. Appl.13, 024069 (2020). URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied. 13.024069

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    D., Kejriwal, A

    Zhao, H., Chen, W. D., Kejriwal, A. & Mirhosseini, M. Quantum-enabled microwave-to-optical transduction via silicon nanomechanics. Nature Nanotechnology20, 602–608 (2025). URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-01874-8

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    A.et al.Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp.Nature Materials5, 33–38 (2005)

    Meitl, M. A.et al.Transfer printing by kinetic control of adhesion to an elastomeric stamp.Nature Materials5, 33–38 (2005). URL 19 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1532

    2005 doi

  38. [46]

    URLhttps://doi.org/10

    Jiang, W.et al.Optically heralded microwave photon addition.Nature Physics19, 1423–1428 (2023). URLhttps://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-023-02129-w

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.