Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 31 references

Influence of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles on the anisotropy of the dielectric properties of nematic liquid crystal 5CB

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding BaTiO3 nanoparticles to the nematic liquid crystal 5CB alters its dielectric permittivity, anisotropy, and mesophase-isophase transition temperature in a concentration-dependent, nonmonotonic way, with low loads enhancing and high lo

desk verdict The experimental dataset is useful, but the abstract's nonmonotonic transition-temperature claim is contradicted by the paper's own monotonic fit. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.26263 v2 pith:3POVN5CF submitted 2026-07-28 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.soft

Juliya M. Gudenko , Oleksandr S. Pylypchuk , Victor V. Vainberg , Denis O. Stetsenko , Igor A. Gvozdovskyy , Serhii E. Ivanchenko , Eugene A. Eliseev , Vladimir N. Poroshin
show 1 more author
Anna N. Morozovska
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.soft
keywords BariumtitanatenanoparticlesNematicliquidcrystal5CBDielectricpermittivityanisotropyFerroelectricMesophase-isophasetransitionIonic-electronicscreeningEffectivemediumapproximationNegativecapacitance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that dispersing ferroelectric barium titanate nanoparticles (average 24 nm) in the nematic liquid crystal 5CB changes the suspension's dielectric permittivity magnitude and anisotropy, its dielectric losses, and its mesophase-isophase transition temperature. At low concentrations (0.5-3 wt%), the nanoparticles enhance the dielectric response, attributed to their ferroelectric polarization and dipole-dipole interactions with the liquid crystal molecules. At high concentrations (5-10 wt%), the permittivity drops even below that of pure 5CB in some frequency ranges, attributed to nanoparticle aggregation, ionic-electronic screening of the particles' polarization, and formation of conductive channels. The mesophase-isophase transition temperature decreases compared to pure 5CB and varies nonmonotonically with concentration, while dielectric anisotropy decreases monotonically. The authors interpret these effects with an effective medium approximation that includes a possible negative capacitance state of the ferroelectric nanoparticles.

What carries the argument

The effective medium approximation (EMA) for ellipsoidal nanoparticles in an anisotropic host — specifically the Maxwell-Garnett-type equation for effective permittivity with a depolarization factor that can be reduced by screening charges, and the associated negative capacitance (NC) state of the ferroelectric nanoparticles. This framework links the concentration-dependent dielectric response to the competition between dipolar polarization enhancement (low concentration) and aggregation/ionic screening with NC behavior (high concentration), and it provides the fitting curves for the transition temperature, anisotropy, and isotropic permittivity.

What would settle it

Measure the complex dielectric permittivity and ionic conductivity of a 5CB suspension with 5 wt% BaTiO3 as a function of temperature from 20 to 40°C at a fixed frequency; if the dielectric permittivity and conductivity change smoothly without any anomaly near the expected size-induced phase transition (around 25-30°C), the ion capture/release crossover is not the operative mechanism. Alternatively, verify the ferroelectric-to-paraelectric transition in suspension (e.g., by second-harmonic generation) to support it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that 24 nm BaTiO3 nanoparticles dispersed in 5CB act as switchable dipolar and ionic agents: in the ferroelectric state they capture mobile ions and enhance polarization response, while after the size-induced ferroelectric-to-paraelectric transition (placed between 20 and 30°C for 15-25 nm particles) they release ions, promoting ionic-electronic screening. This crossover, together with nanoparticle aggregation at high concentration, explains the nonmonotonic concentration dependence of the isotropic-phase permittivity and of the nematic-isotropic transition temperature. The paper also establishes a monotonic decrease of dielectric anisotropy with nanoparticle content, co

Load-bearing premise

The explanation assumes that the 24 nm particles remain single-domain ferroelectric in the suspension and lose their spontaneous polarization when heated from 20 to 30°C, driving the ion capture/release crossover; if that transition does not occur in situ, the proposed high-concentration permittivity decrease and nonmonotonic transition temperature lack their mechanism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Concentration is a tuning knob: below roughly 4 wt% BaTiO3 increases the suspension's low-frequency permittivity, while above 5 wt% it decreases it, so applications can select a regime by particle loading.
  • The monotonic drop in dielectric anisotropy with nanoparticle load indicates progressive disturbance of orientational order, which should impact any electro-optic device based on 5CB.
  • The nonmonotonic transition temperature implies an optimal nanoparticle concentration for minimally destabilizing the nematic phase, relevant for devices operating near room temperature.
  • The resistivity hysteresis observed in field sweeps suggests these suspensions may exhibit resistive switching, making them candidates for memory or switching elements.
  • The successful EMA fit with a negative capacitance state offers a route to extract nanoparticle parameters (depolarization factor, screening length) from macroscopic dielectric measurements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ion capture/release crossover is real, the dielectric response and ionic conductivity should show a kink or step when crossing the size-induced ferroelectric-paraelectric transition temperature (~25-30°C) for a fixed concentration; this is directly testable by temperature-dependent impedance spectroscopy.
  • The negative capacitance interpretation implies the suspension might serve as a testbed for negative capacitance in a liquid environment, which could be relevant for low-voltage electronics if the effect persists under AC fields.
  • The aggregation explanation at high concentration could be distinguished from the negative capacitance explanation by measuring the particle size distribution in the suspension (e.g., dynamic light scattering); if aggregation dominates, the permittivity drop should correlate with cluster formation.
  • The reported decrease of the nematic-isotropic transition temperature at all concentrations suggests a general mechanism of director disruption by nanoparticles, which could be compared with non-ferroelectric nanoparticles to isolate the specific role of ferroelectricity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of the dielectric response, conductivity, and nematic-isotropic transition of 5CB liquid crystal suspensions doped with 0.5–10 wt% BaTiO3 nanoparticles (nominal size 24 nm). Measurements of permittivity, loss tangent, and resistivity as functions of frequency, bias field, and temperature are presented for several concentrations. The authors report that low concentrations enhance the dielectric permittivity while high concentrations (5–10 wt%) reduce it, that the dielectric anisotropy decreases monotonically with concentration, and — in the abstract and conclusions — that the mesophase-isotropic transition temperature depends nonmonotonically on concentration. A theoretical interpretation is offered using effective-medium approximations, with the high-concentration decrease in isotropic permittivity attributed to ionic-electronic screening and a possible negative-capacitance state of the ferroelectric nanoparticles. The manuscript is written as an invited contribution to Low Temperature Physics.

Significance. If the experimental data are reliable, this systematic study could contribute useful information on how ferroelectric nanoparticle concentration modulates the dielectric properties of a common nematic liquid crystal, with potential implications for tunable dielectric materials and electro-optical devices. The paper includes multiple concentration series, temperature- and frequency-dependent measurements, and a comparison of three sample series in Figure 6. However, the central claim of a nonmonotonic transition-temperature dependence is internally contradicted by the paper's own data description and fitting, and the theoretical interpretation leans on unverified assumptions about the ferroelectric state of the nanoparticles in suspension and on free-parameter fits. These issues materially weaken the current version, but the underlying experimental work appears salvageable if the claims are corrected and the analysis is made more rigorous.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4 (Fig. 6(a))] The abstract states that the mesophase-isophase transition temperature dependence on BaTiO3 concentration 'appeared nonmonotonic', and the conclusions repeat this claim. However, Section 4 explicitly states that 'the overall decrease of nematic-isotropic phase transition temperature T_tr with increase in μ ... can be fitted by a hyperbola, namely T_tr = T0/(1 + μ/μ0)', and Figure 6(a) is described as showing a decrease with a tendency to saturate. A hyperbola of this functional form is strictly decreasing and cannot represent a nonmonotonic dependence. This is a direct internal inconsistency: the paper's headline result is contradicted by its own data description and fitting. The abstract and conclusions must be corrected, or the data and fit must be re-examined. This is load-bearing and must be resolved before publication.
  2. [Section 4, after Fig. 7(a)] The explanation of the nonmonotonic isotropic permittivity ε_iso(μ) and the ion capture/release crossover rests on the assumption that 15–25 nm BaTiO3 nanoparticles are single-domain ferroelectric at 20°C and become paraelectric when heated to 20–30°C. This assumption is taken from the authors' prior work (Refs. 18, 21, 24) and is not verified in the suspension. If the particles do not lose their polarization in the temperature window of the measurements, or if they are not ferroelectric in the liquid-crystal environment, the proposed crossover and the negative-capacitance rationale for the decrease of ε_iso at high concentration lose their foundation. The manuscript should provide in-situ evidence or at least explicit uncertainty about this assumption; as it stands, the mechanism is speculative.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (1)–(3) and Fig. 6(c)] The 'blue solid curves are theoretical fittings' are not parameter-free predictions. The hyperbola for T_tr uses two free fitting parameters T0 and μ0, stated explicitly in the text. The model for ε_iso in Eqs. (1)–(3) and Fig. 7 produces only monotonic dependencies for a fixed sign of ε_NP; the nonmonotonicity is attributed to a crossover between regimes without a quantitative fit to the measured ε_iso(μ) values. Additionally, the conversion from weight percent to volume fraction μ is not specified, so the abscissa in Fig. 6 and the fitted μ0 carry an implicit free parameter. Please provide the wt%-to-μ conversion, report fitting parameters with confidence intervals, and show a quantitative comparison of the EMA model to the data in Fig. 6.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2 / Figure 3(a)] Section 3 states the measurements were performed at 'measurement signal amplitude of 0.25 V', but the caption of Fig. 3(a) says 'voltage level is 2.5 V'. Please reconcile this discrepancy.
  2. [Section 3 / Figure 4(b)] The text says 'on swiping the applied voltage up and down'; presumably 'sweeping' is intended. Also, the hysteresis-like behavior would be clearer if the sweep direction was indicated in the figure.
  3. [Figures 5 and 6] The caption of Fig. 6 mentions black, red, and green symbols with error bars, but the visible plots appear to show a single curve per concentration. If error bars exist, please make them visible; otherwise, the claim that the anisotropy decrease 'agrees with experimental measurements considering error bars' cannot be verified.
  4. [Section 2] The particle size dispersion is given as 'less than ±(10–15) nm' for an average size of 24 nm; this is a very large relative uncertainty and should be clarified or corrected.
  5. [References] Several references are dated 2026 and include placeholder DOIs (e.g., Ref. [23] 'https://doi.org/10.1103/b332-gcxc', Ref. [28] 'https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3263/1/012029'). Please verify these are correct and update them before submission.
  6. [Throughout] The phrase 'mesophase-isophase transition' is unusual; 'nematic-isotropic transition' is the standard terminology and is used inconsistently with the abstract. Please standardize.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

No equation-level circularity: measurements are independent and the T_tr curve is explicitly fitted. However, the speculative mechanism for nonmonotonic ε_iso relies on load-bearing self-citations (size-induced FE/PE crossover, negative capacitance), and the abstract's nonmonotonic T_tr claim conflicts with the paper's own monotonic fit.

  1. self citation load bearing [Sections 2 and 4 (after Fig. 7(a)); Refs [18], [21], [24]]
    "According to X-ray diffraction results and theoretical calculation performed earlier for the same BaTiO3 nanoparticles [18, 21], the large nanoparticles ... are in the single-domain ferroelectric state ... For instance, the temperature increase from 20oC to 30oC should induce the transition to the paraelectric phase in the 15 – 25 nm nanoparticles ... crossover from the ion capturing regime by the ferroelectric nanoparticles to the ion release regime by paraelectric nanoparticles may appear due to the disappearance of their spontaneous polarization."

    The theoretical explanation of the measured nonmonotonic ε_iso(μ) and of the high-concentration decrease is anchored in the assumption that 15-25 nm BaTiO3 particles are ferroelectric at 20°C and become paraelectric upon heating to 20-30°C, a size-induced transition asserted via the authors' own Refs [18,21,24] rather than verified in the suspension. This same-group prior work supplies the ion capture/release crossover and the negative-capacitance rationale; without it the proposed mechanism is unsupported. The experimental data themselves are independent, so the circularity is limited to the interpretive layer.

full rationale

The paper's measurements (permittivity, anisotropy, losses, transition temperature vs concentration) are direct experimental facts and are not produced by the model. The EMA equations are standard mixing relations, and the T_tr concentration curve is explicitly fitted using fitting parameters T0 and μ0, not presented as a parameter-free prediction; the ε_iso(μ) nonmonotonicity is offered speculatively ('may be explained', 'may appear'). The main circularity-like concern is that the proposed mechanism (ferroelectric single-domain state, ion capture/release crossover, negative capacitance) is imported from the same authors' prior papers and is not independently established in situ. This makes the theoretical interpretation partially self-referential, but the central empirical claims retain independent content. A separate, non-circularity problem is that the abstract's nonmonotonic T_tr claim contradicts the monotonic hyperbola fit and the statement that T_tr only decreases; this should be corrected as a factual inconsistency.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim depends on (i) an effective-medium description of a two-component dielectric, (ii) the ferroelectric/paraelectric state of 24 nm BaTiO3 at the working temperatures, and (iii) ionic screening plus a negative-capacitance state to explain concentration reversal. Explicit fitting parameters: T0, μ0, λ_eff, and ε_NP, with μ conversion from wt% also unspecified.

free parameters (5)
  • T0 (zero-concentration transition temperature) = not reported (fitted from Fig. 6(a))
    Hyperbola fit T_tr = T0/(1 + μ/μ0); Section 4.
  • μ0 (characteristic volume fraction) = not reported (fitted from Fig. 6(a))
    Same hyperbola; sets the concentration scale for suppression of the transition.
  • λ_eff (effective screening length of ionic-electronic shell) = not measured; assumed small (<1 nm to reduce depolarization factor by >10x)
    Used to estimate η_eff and rationalize ion capture/release; Section 4 and Fig. 7(a).
  • ε_NP (nanoparticle permittivity, including negative values) = not determined; sign chosen to reproduce monotonic increase/decrease in Fig. 7
    The ε_iso(μ) decrease is attributed to negative ε_NP (negative-capacitance state), but no direct measurement is given.
  • μ (volume fraction conversion from wt%) = not specified
    The model uses volume fraction μ while experiments use wt%; no density or conversion is stated.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Effective medium approximation (EMA) with depolarization factor (Eq. 1a) describes the suspension as a uniform mixture of monodisperse, uniformly polarized ellipsoidal particles in an anisotropic host.
    Used throughout Section 4; validity breaks at high concentrations where aggregation and percolation channels are invoked.
  • domain assumption 24 nm BaTiO3 nanoparticles are single-domain ferroelectric at 20°C with large spontaneous polarization (~1.3 C/m²).
    Taken from Refs. [18,21] by the same group; underpins the low-concentration permittivity enhancement and dipole-dipole ordering.
  • domain assumption 15-25 nm BaTiO3 particles undergo a size-induced paraelectric transition at 20-30°C, enabling ion capture below and ion release above.
    Section 4: 'temperature increase from 20oC to 30oC should induce the transition to the paraelectric phase in the 15–25 nm nanoparticles'; from Ref. [24], load-bearing for the crossover explanation.
  • domain assumption Negative capacitance (negative effective permittivity) state can exist in ferroelectric nanoparticles and explains decreasing ε_iso at high μ.
    Section 4; relies on Refs. [29,30] and is not directly measured in this paper.
  • domain assumption A 10 V bias fully reorients the 5CB director homeotropically so the upper curves in Fig. 5 represent ε_∥.
    Section 3 and Fig. 5; if alignment is incomplete, Δε values and transition temperatures are biased.
invented entities (2)
  • Negative-capacitance (negative-permittivity) state of BaTiO3 nanoparticles in suspension
    purpose: Explains why ε_iso decreases at 5-10 wt% despite the high permittivity of BaTiO3.
    No direct measurement of negative ε_NP is provided; the interpretation relies on self-cited Refs. [29,30], and Fig. 7 shows the model needs ε_NP < 0 to obtain a decrease.
  • Ionic-electronic screening shell with effective screening length λ_eff
    purpose: Suppresses depolarization fields and mediates ion capture/release crossover.
    λ_eff is not measured; the shell is a standard double-layer concept, but its quantitative role here is a model input rather than an experimentally constrained quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Influence of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles on the anisotropy of the dielectric properties of nematic liquid crystal 5CB." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3POVN5CF

@misc{pith2026260726263,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Influence of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles on the anisotropy of the dielectric properties of nematic liquid crystal 5CB},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3POVN5CF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.26263}
}
read the original abstract

This work is devoted to the mechanisms of dielectric response and electric conductivity of suspensions consisting of the nematic liquid crystal 5CB with different concentrations (from 0 to 10 wt.%) of ferroelectric BaTiO_3 nanoparticles with an average size of 24 nm. We revealed that the incorporation of nanoparticles influences significantly the dielectric permittivity magnitude and anisotropy, as well as dielectric losses of the suspension. A pronounced temperature dependence of the anisotropic dielectric permittivity of the suspensions was found at lower temperatures corresponding to the mesophase state; but it is also present at higher temperatures corresponding to the isophase. The dependence of the mesophase-isophase transition temperature on the concentration of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles appeared nonmonotonic. With increasing temperature, both the capacitance and the electrical resistance of the pure liquid crystal increase, as well as it increases in the suspensions with small concentration of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles. Due to space charge accumulation in the shells of nanoparticles, larger concentrations of BaTiO_3 nanoparticles influence strongly the ionic transport by promoting the formation of ionic-electronic screening. This effect modifies the dielectric properties and conduction mechanisms of the suspension, leading to the nonmonotonic dependence of the mesophase - isophase transition temperature versus the nanoparticle concentration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.26263 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of experimental setup. 1) Measurement sample, 2) temperature￾controlled chamber, 3) stable temperature (can vary), 4) LCR meter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frequency dependences of the effective dielectric permittivity and dielectric loss tangent (a) and resistivity (b) of 5CB liquid crystal with different concentrations of the BaTiO₃ nanoparticles measured at 20oC. The voltage level is 2.5 V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Dependences of the effective dielectric permittivity (a) and electrical resistivity (b) on the electric field strength in the 5CB suspensions with the BaTiO₃ nanoparticles measured at 20oC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Temperature dependences of the effective dielectric permittivity of suspensions with different content of BaTiO₃ nanoparticles. Figures 6(a)-(c) present a summary of the results of the study of the influence of the concentration of BaTiO₃ nanoparticles on the nematic-i…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (c) shows the dependence of the effective dielectric permittivity in the isotropic phase. Effective dielectric permittivity increases for small concentrations and begins to decrease at larger concentrations, namely at 5% and 10%. 0 2 4 6 8 10 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 0 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reznikov, O

    Y. Reznikov, O. Buchnev, O. Tereshchenko, V. Reshetnyak, A. Glushchenko, and J. West. Ferroelectric nematic suspension. Applied Physics Letters 82, 1917 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1560871

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1560871 1917

  2. [2]

    Atkuri, G

    H. Atkuri, G. Cook, D.R. Evans, C.I. Cheon, A. Glushchenko, V. Reshetnyak, Yu. Reznikov, J. West, and K. Zhang. Preparation of ferroelectric nanoparticles for their use in liquid crystalline colloids. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 11, 024006 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024006

    work page doi:10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024006 2009

  3. [3]

    Kurochkin, H

    O. Kurochkin, H. Atkuri, O. Buchnev, A. Glushchenko, O. Grabar, R. Karapinar, V. Reshetnyak, J. West, and Yu. Reznikov. Nano-colloids of Sn2P2S6 in nematic liquid crystal pentyl-cyanobiphenyl. Condensed Matter Physics 13, 33701 (2010), https://doi.org/10.5488/CMP.13.33701

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.13.33701 2010

  4. [4]

    Cook, A.V

    G. Cook, A.V. Glushchenko, V. Reshetnyak, A.T. Griffith, M.A. Saleh, and D.R. Evans. Nanoparticle doped organic-inorganic hybrid photorefractives. Optics Express 16, 4015 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.004015

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.16.004015 2008

  5. [5]

    Evans, S.A

    D.R. Evans, S.A. Basun, G. Cook, I.P. Pinkevych, and V.Yu. Reshetnyak. Electric field interactions and aggregation dynamics of ferroelectric nanoparticles in isotropic fluid suspensions. Physical Review B 84, 174111 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174111

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.174111 2011

  6. [6]

    Gudenko, O.S

    J.M. Gudenko, O.S. Pylypchuk, V .V . Vainberg, I.A. Gvozdovskyy, S.E. Ivanchenko, D.O. Stetsenko, N.V . Morozovsky, V .N. Poroshin, E. A. Eliseev, and A.N. 18 Morozovska. Ferroelectric nanoparticles in liquid crystals: the role of ionic transport at small concentrations of the nanoparticles. Semiconductor Physics, Optoelectronics and Quantum Electronics, ...

    work page doi:10.15407/spqeo28.01.010 2025

  7. [7]

    J. M. Gudenko, O. S. Pylypchuk, V . V . Vainberg, V . N. Poroshin, D. O. Stetsenko, I. A. Gvozdovskyy, O. V . Bereznykov, S. E. Ivanchenko, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska. Dynamics of charge states at the surface of a ferroelectric nanoparticle in a liquid crystal. Semiconductor Physics, Optoelectronics and Quantum Electronics, 28 (3), 258 (2025); https:...

    work page doi:10.15407/spqeo28.03.258 2025

  8. [8]

    Saurabh N. Paul, R. Dhar, R. Verma, S. Sharma & R. Dabrowski. Change in Dielectric and Electro-Optical Properties of a Nematic Material (6CHBT) Due to the Dispersion of BaTiO3 Nanoparticles, Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals, 545:1, 105/[1329]-111/[1335] (2011); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2011.571961

    arXiv 2011

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Singh, R

    U.B. Singh, R. Dhar, R. Dabrowski & M.B. Pandey. Enhanced electro-optical properties of a nematic liquid crystals in presence of BaTiO3 nanoparticles, Liquid Crystals, 41:7, 953-959 (2014); http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2014.894209

    2014

  2. [10]

    Rastogi, A

    A. Rastogi, A. Mishra, F. P. Pandey, R. Manohar, A. S. Parmar, Enhancing physical characteristics of thermotropic nematic liquid crystals by dispersing in various nanoparticles and their potential applications (Review), Emergent Materials (2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    Drozd-Rzoska, S

    A. Drozd-Rzoska, S. Starzonek, S. J. Rzoska, and S. Kralj. Nanoparticle- controlled glassy dynamics in nematogen-based nanocolloids. Physical Review E 99, 052703 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.052703

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Varshney, J

    D. Varshney, J. Prakash, V. P. Singh, K. Yadav, and G. Singh. Probing the impact of bismuth-titanate based nanocomposite on the dielectric and electro-optical features of a nematic liquid crystal material. Journal of Molecular Liquids 347, 118389 (2022); https://doi.org/10.101...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Caruntu, T

    D. Caruntu, T. Rostamzadeh, T. Costanzo, S.S. Parizi, and G. Caruntu. Solvothermal synthesis and controlled self-assembly of monodisperse titanium-based perovskite colloidal nanocrystals. Nanoscale 7, 12955 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00737B 19

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Nayak, T.K

    S. Nayak, T.K. Chaki, and D. Khastgir. Spherical ferroelectric PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 nanoparticles with high permittivity: Switchable dielectric phase transition with temperature. Ceramics International 42, 14490 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.056

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    Lorenz, N

    A. Lorenz, N. Zimmermann, S. Kumar, D.R. Evans, G. Cook, and H.-S. Kitzerow. Doping the nematic liquid crystal 5CB with milled BaTiO3 nanoparticles. Physical Review E 86, 051704 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.051704

    2012 doi

  8. [16]

    Beh, S.A

    E.S. Beh, S.A. Basun, X. Feng, I.U. Idehenre, D.R. Evans, and M.W. Kanan. Molecular catalysis at polarized interfaces created by ferroelectric BaTiO3. Chemical Science 8, 2790, (2017), https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC05032H

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Idehenre, Yu.A

    I.U. Idehenre, Yu.A. Barnakov, S.A. Basun, and D.R. Evans. Spectroscopic studies of the effects of mechanochemical synthesis on BaTiO3 nanocolloids prepared using high-energy ball-milling. Journal Applied Physics 124, 165501 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5046682

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Morozovska, O.S

    A.N. Morozovska, O.S. Pylypchuk, S. Ivanchenko, E.A. Eliseev, H.V . Shevliakova, L.M. Korolevich, L.P. Yurchenko, O.V . Shyrokov, N.V . Morozovsky, V .N. Poroshin, Z. Kutnjak, and V .V . Vainberg. Electrocaloric response of the dense ferroelectric nanocomposites. Ceramics Inte...

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Barnakov, I.U

    Yu.A. Barnakov, I.U. Idehenre, S.A. Basun, T.A. Tyson, and D.R. Evans. Uncovering the mystery of ferroelectricity in zero dimensional nanoparticles. Nanoscale Advances 1, 664 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00131F

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Liu, S. Ghose, B. Ravel, I.U. Idehenre, Y .A. Barnakov, S.A. Basun, D.R. Evans, and T.A. Tyson. Structural Origin of recovered ferroelectricity in BaTiO3 nanoparticles. Physical Review B 108, 064106 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.064106

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    Eliseev, A.N

    E.A. Eliseev, A.N. Morozovska, S.V . Kalinin, and D.R. Evans. Strain-induced polarization enhancement in BaTiO3 core-shell nanoparticles. Physical Review B 109, 014104 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014104

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, O. A. Kovalenko, and D. R. Evans. The 20 Influence of Chemical Strains on the Electrocaloric Response, Polarization Morphology, Tetragonality and Negative Capacitance Effect of Ferroelectric Core- Shell Nanorods and Nanowires. Physical Review A...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    O. A. Kovalenko, E. A. Eliseev, Y . O. Zagorodniy, S. D. Škapin, M. M. Kržmanc, L. Demchenko, V . V . Laguta, Z. Kutnjak, D. R. Evans, and A. N. Morozovska. Strain-Gradient and Curvature-Induced Changes in Domain Morphology of BaTiO3 Nanorods: Experimental and Theoretical Stud...

    2026 doi

  16. [24]

    S. V . Kalinin, E. A. Eliseev, and A. N. Morozovska. Adsorption of ions from aqueous solutions by ferroelectric nanoparticles. Physical Review Applied 23, 014081 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.014081

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    G. L. Carr, S. Perkowitz, and D. B. Tanner. Far-infrared properties of inhomogeneous materials. Infrared and millimeter waves. Volume 13, Part 4 (Orlando, Academic Press, 1985) pp. 171-263

    1985

  18. [26]

    Petzelt, D

    J. Petzelt, D. Nuzhnyy, V . Bovtun, M. Savinov, M. Kempa, I. Rychetsky, Broadband dielectric and conductivity spectroscopy of inhomogeneous and composite conductors. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 210, 2259 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201329288

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    O. S. Pylypchuk, V . V . Vainberg, V . N. Poroshin, O. V . Leshchenko, V . N. Pavlikov, I. V . Kondakova, S. E. Ivanchenko, L. P. Yurchenko, L. Demchenko, A. O. Diachenko, M. V . Karpets, M. P. Trubitsyn, E. A. Eliseev, and A. N. Morozovska. A colossal dielectric response of H...

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    A. N. Morozovska and M. V. Strikha. Influence of the negative capacitance state of the layer with ferroelectric nanoparticles on the FET subthreshold swing. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 3263, 012029 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/3263/1/012029

    2026 doi

  21. [30]

    A. N. Morozovska, O. V. Bereznykov, M. V. Strikha, O. S. Pylypchuk, Z. Kutnjak, E. A. Eliseev, and D. R. Evans. Domain Morphology, Electrocaloric Response, and Negative Capacitance States of Ferroelectric Nanowires Array. Composite Interfaces (2025); https://doi.org/10.1080/09...

    2025

  22. [31]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, L. P. Pitaevskii. Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, (Second Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1984)

    1984

  23. [32]

    A. N. Morozovska, S. Cherifi-Hertel, E. A. Eliseev, V . V . Khist, R. Hertel, and D. R. Evans. The Role of Flexoelectric Coupling and Chemical Strains in the Emergence of Polar Chiral Nano-Structures. Journal of Applied Physics, 138, 030701 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0277483

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.