Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 59 references

Epoch-of-reionization observations independently recover the low optical depth favored by CMB polarization, so excluding polarization data cannot erase the preference for dynamical dark energy.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 03:15 UTC pith:IGJWSUH4

load-bearing objection Useful and credible reionization constraint, but the '≥2σ' dark-energy preference is overstated: Δχ² = −4.6 for two extra parameters is not 2σ. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.26373 v2 pith:IGJWSUH4 submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.CO

No way ouτ: Epoch of Reionization Observations Do not Support Large Values of the Optical Depth to Reionization

Paulo Montero-Camacho , Yi Mao This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.-k98.70.Vc95.36.+x
keywords cosmic reionizationoptical depth to reionizationdynamical dark energycosmic microwave backgroundbaryon acoustic oscillationsquasar damping wingsdark pixel constraintsGompertzian reionization model
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper addresses a proposed loophole in the evidence for dynamical dark energy: recent analyses that combine high-redshift CMB data with baryon acoustic oscillation measurements prefer dynamical dark energy at about 3σ, but they rely on large-scale CMB polarization to fix the optical depth to reionization. Dropping that polarization data had been shown to weaken the tension with ΛCDM, but it also pushes the optical depth up to ~0.09. This work replaces the usual tanh reionization history with a physically motivated Gompertzian model calibrated against reionization simulations, and adds independent astrophysical constraints on the neutral hydrogen fraction from quasar damping wings and dark pixels. The joint analysis returns τreio = 0.067 ± 0.011 in a dynamical dark energy scenario, consistent with analyses that include the polarization data, and the preference for dynamical dark energy survives at ≳2σ. The conclusion is that epoch-of-reionization observations do not support large values of the optical depth, so blaming a polarization systematic for the dark-energy preference would require many independent reionization observations to be wrong simultaneously.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, in a self-consistent Bayesian analysis that deliberately excludes large-scale CMB polarization data, robust astrophysical probes of the reionization history—quasar damping wing observations and dark pixel constraints—combined with a physically motivated Gompertzian reionization model recover an optical depth τreio = 0.067 ± 0.011 (68% CL) under a w0waCDM cosmology. This value agrees with the τ ≈ 0.06 inferred from analyses that do include large-scale CMB polarization, and it contradicts the inflated values (~0.09) that had been used to suggest the dark-energy preference is a polarization artifact. The dynamical dark energy scenario still fits the data bette

What carries the argument

The central object is the Gompertzian reionization model, an asymmetric sigmoid for the volume-weighted neutral hydrogen fraction xH i(z), whose shape is fixed by a fifth-degree polynomial calibrated against hydrodynamic reionization simulations and then modulated by two free parameters—a pivot scale and a tilt. Implemented directly in the Boltzmann solver, it allows the optical depth τreio to be computed as a derived parameter rather than sampled as a free parameter. It plays the decisive role in the argument: unlike the symmetric tanh reionization history used in the comparison analyses, the Gompertzian model matches the gradual start of reionization predicted by simulations, and when comb

Load-bearing premise

The Gompertzian reionization model's fixed coefficients were calibrated against simulations that assume ΛCDM; if those simulations, or the transfer of that calibration to a w0waCDM analysis, do not represent the real early ionizing-source population, the derived τreio and the inferred dark-energy preference would shift.

What would settle it

A new, robust EoR measurement that pushes the midpoint of reionization to higher redshift—or that reveals a more extended early reionization than the Gompertzian model allows—would increase the inferred τreio; if a data set that excludes large-scale CMB polarization then yielded τreio ≳ 0.08, the paper's conclusion that EoR observations disfavor large optical depths would be contradicted. Conversely, a demonstrated systematic in the quasar damping wing or dark pixel measurements that biases them toward later reionization would undermine the result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Within ΛCDM, adding quasar damping wing and dark pixel data to a Gompertzian reionization model shifts the inferred optical depth down to 0.077 ± 0.011, excluding the ~0.09 value at more than 1σ.
  • In the dynamical dark energy (w0waCDM) scenario, the recovered τreio = 0.067 ± 0.011 matches the value obtained when large-scale CMB polarization is included, showing that EoR observations independently support the polarization-based measurement.
  • The preference for dynamical dark energy over ΛCDM remains at ≳2σ even without large-scale CMB polarization, so the earlier relaxation of the tension is not reproduced when a physical reionization model and EoR data are used.
  • The apparent preference for negative neutrino masses is resolved: the 95% upper limit on the neutrino mass sum becomes 0.219 eV, consistent with both mass orderings and neutrino oscillation measurements.
  • Reconciling ΛCDM with the data would require a systematic that affects large-scale CMB polarization and, simultaneously, multiple independent epoch-of-reionization observations in a mutually consistent way.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Gompertzian calibration holds in non-ΛCDM cosmologies, then future high-redshift 21-cm observations and additional quasar damping wing data should tighten τreio further; a measured value much below 0.05 would directly challenge the dynamical dark-energy scenario's consistency with CMB polarization.
  • The paper's logic implies that the 'high τreio' route to easing the S8 or Hubble tension is closed unless non-standard physics (e.g., energy injection from dark matter decay/annihilation or primordial black holes) modifies the early reionization history, which the authors flag as a future direction.
  • A natural extension is to repeat the joint analysis with alternative physically motivated reionization reconstructions to see whether the inferred τreio shifts; if it does by more than ~0.01, the conclusion would be sensitive to the choice of reionization prior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates whether excluding large-scale CMB polarization data from cosmological analyses, which otherwise raises the inferred optical depth to reionization to τ≈0.09, can be reconciled with independent Epoch of Reionization (EoR) observations. Using a Gompertzian reionization model implemented in CLASS, the authors combine CMB temperature and high-ℓ polarization, CMB lensing, DESI BAO, quasar damping-wing constraints, and two dark-pixel upper limits, while explicitly excluding low-ℓ CMB polarization. They report τreio=0.077±0.011 in ΛCDM and τreio=0.067±0.011 in w0waCDM, the latter agreeing with polarization-based estimates. They also report a preference for dynamical dark energy with ΛCDM excluded at ⪆2σ based on Δχ²=-4.6. The paper argues that EoR observations independently recover the low optical depth favored by CMB polarization, so a polarization systematic alone cannot explain the dynamical dark energy preference.

Significance. If the central claims were robust, this would be a valuable contribution: it demonstrates the importance of a physically motivated, simulation-calibrated reionization history in joint CMB+EoR analyses, and it provides a public implementation of the Gompertzian model. The analysis is self-consistent in that τreio is treated as a derived parameter, and the inclusion of robust EoR data is a useful complement to existing reconstructions. However, the headline claim of a ⪆2σ preference for w0waCDM is not supported by the paper's own Δχ² statistic, and the abstract's conclusion that astrophysical probes independently recover the CMB-polarization value is only true in the dynamically preferred model. These issues are central to the paper's message and require correction before the conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Figure 5, Conclusions] The claim that ΛCDM is excluded at ⪆2σ, repeated in the abstract, Figure 5 caption, and Conclusions, is not supported by the reported Δχ²=-4.6 for two additional free parameters (w0, wa). For a nested model with 2 extra degrees of freedom, the p-value is ~0.10, corresponding to about 1.6σ, not 2σ. The AIC improvement is only ΔAIC≈0.6, and no BIC/DIC or look-elsewhere correction is presented. The paper acknowledges the improvement is 'modest' but does not reconcile this with the ⪆2σ language. This is a load-bearing statistical inconsistency because the abstract's main conclusion—that EoR data recover the polarization value—relies on the w0waG model being genuinely preferred over ΛG. Please provide a proper model-comparison statistic and soften or remove the ⪆2σ claim.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (2), and title] Under ΛCDM, the result is τreio=0.077±0.011, so τreio≈0.09 is excluded at only ~1.2σ. The title and concluding statement that EoR observations 'do not support large values' of the optical depth are therefore too strong if ΛCDM is not rejected. Moreover, the abstract's statement that EoR probes 'independently recover the optical depth required by CMB polarization measurements' applies to the w0waG value (0.067±0.011), not to the ΛG value; the ΛG result is only marginally consistent with low-ℓ-polarization-based estimates. Since the w0waG preference is not established at the claimed significance, the paper's central message presently overstates what the data show. The framing should be revised to distinguish the ΛCDM and w0waCDM cases explicitly.
  3. [Appendix A and Section 2] The fixed Gompertzian coefficients (Eq. A3) are calibrated against reionization simulations that assume ΛCDM. The paper argues this is harmless because reionization occurs during matter domination, but it does not quantify the systematic uncertainty in transferring a simulation-calibrated functional form to a w0waCDM analysis. The optical-depth integrand weights high-redshift contributions strongly, so even a small mismatch in the early reionization history could shift τreio. I ask for a sensitivity test—for example, varying the coefficients within the simulation scatter or comparing the Gompertzian form against an independent simulated reionization history in a w0waCDM background—to demonstrate that the central τreio result is robust to the calibration assumption.
  4. [Section 2, EoR data selection] The analysis includes only QSO damping-wing measurements and two dark-pixel points, justified as the 'most robust' constraints. However, the selection criteria are qualitative, and the paper does not explore sensitivity to this choice. Earlier reconstructions using a broader EoR compilation obtain substantially lower τreio (≈0.05); the present choice yields τreio≈0.077 in ΛCDM. Given that the paper criticizes other works for including heterogeneous data, a robustness check showing how τreio changes when additional EoR measurements (e.g., galaxy damping wings or Lyα luminosity functions) are added or removed would strengthen the claim that the selected data, rather than the model, drive the result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Conclusions] Typo: 'insufficient' should be 'insufficient'.
  2. [Section 2] The phrase 'multipole independent EoR observations' is unclear; presumably 'multiple independent EoR observations' is intended.
  3. [Section 2] The reference to 'Appendix 5 of [18]' should be checked: it may be 'Appendix C' or a numbered section, not 'Appendix 5'.
  4. [Section 1] The text says 'neutral network-based approaches'; this should be 'neural network-based approaches'.
  5. [Figure 2] The shaded pink region is described as the ACT DR6 1σ constraint, but the exact value and uncertainty are not quoted in the text. Please state the ACT DR6 τreio value in the caption or text for quantitative comparison.
  6. [Table 1] The table lists 'Data =lowℓ CEEℓ' and related notation that is hard to parse. Please define the shorthand (e.g., low-ℓ CMB TT, high-ℓ CMB TTTEEE, CMB lensing, BAO) directly in the table caption or in a footnote.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the optical depth is derived from external EoR data through a self-consistent fit, not reconstructed from the same target it claims to predict.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a joint Bayesian fit of CMB, BAO, QSO damping-wing, and dark-pixel data under a Gompertzian reionization model. The optical depth tau_reio is not a fitted input; it is a derived parameter obtained by integrating the fitted neutral-fraction history x_HI(z). The EoR data are external observations included in the likelihood, while the Gompertzian model coefficients are fixed in advance from simulation calibration ([18],[27]) and are not tuned to the CMB polarization value that the paper claims to independently recover. The simulations used for calibration assume LambdaCDM, but the paper explicitly acknowledges this and argues that dark energy is negligible during the matter-dominated reionization epoch; this is a stated modeling limitation rather than a circular reduction. The paper also checks its inferred reionization history against external JWST and Ly-alpha observations not used in the likelihood, providing independent validation. The statistical concern about Delta chi^2 = -4.6 being called a '>2 sigma' exclusion of LambdaCDM is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue, since it does not make the prediction equivalent to the input by construction. Overall, no specific step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs or to a self-citation chain that replaces independent evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the Gompertzian parameterization with coefficients from the authors' earlier simulation-calibrated work, plus the selection of robust EoR data. Beyond standard cosmological parameters, the model adds α and β, which are fit to the data. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (7)
  • w0 (dark energy EOS today) = -0.42 ± 0.25 (68% CL)
    Free parameter of w0waCDM; central to the DDE preference claim.
  • wa (dark energy EOS slope) = -1.74 ± 0.77 (68% CL)
    Free parameter of w0waCDM; central to the DDE preference claim.
  • Σmν (sum of neutrino masses) = <0.219 eV (95% CL); posterior peak ~0.1 eV
    Varied only in w0wa models; affects the fit and the reported neutrino-mass bound.
  • Gompertzian α (power-law pivot) = not quoted
    Free parameter of the Gompertzian reionization model (Eq. A4); fit to the joint data.
  • Gompertzian β (rescaling tilt) = not quoted
    Free parameter of the Gompertzian reionization model (Eq. A4); fit to the joint data.
  • Ωm (matter density) = 0.2991±0.0037 (ΛG); 0.352±0.024 (w0waG)
    Standard cosmological parameter; involved in the τreio-Ωm degeneracy discussed in Section 4.
  • As (primordial amplitude) = not quoted
    Standard cosmological parameter; enters the Ase^{-2τreio} degeneracy discussed in Section 3.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Gompertzian coefficients c_m calibrated against ΛCDM reionization simulations remain valid for w0waCDM universes.
    Section 2 states the simulations 'assume ΛCDM' and dismisses the impact of dark energy because reionization occurs in matter domination; this transferability is load-bearing for the w0waG results.
  • domain assumption The selected EoR constraints (QSO damping wings and the two lowest-redshift dark pixel points) have unbiased uncertainties and cleanly map to x_HI(z).
    Section 2 excludes galaxy damping wings citing cosmic variance [36]; this selection directly affects the inferred τreio and is not derived from first principles.
  • domain assumption The high-ℓ CMB likelihoods (Planck PR4 + ACT DR6) and the CMB lensing constraint σ8Ωm^0.25 are reliable and correctly implemented.
    Section 3 uses these to break the As-τreio degeneracy; any error in these likelihoods propagates into the DDE preference.
  • domain assumption The reionization simulations used for Gompertzian calibration are representative of the real reionization process.
    Appendix A references [18] for calibration details; if the simulations miss important early-source physics, the derived τ is biased.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11770 in / 12238 out tokens · 610592 ms · 2026-08-04T03:15:03.724978+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent cosmological analyses combining high-redshift cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements with low-redshift baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data have reported a preference for dynamical dark energy, with the cosmological constant scenario ($\Lambda$CDM) disfavored at the $\sim 3\sigma$ level. These analyses, however, typically rely on large-scale CMB polarization measurements to constrain the optical depth to reionization $\tau_{\rm reio}\sim 0.06$, raising the question of whether potential systematics in this dataset could influence the inferred cosmological preference. Excluding large-scale polarization data substantially weakens the tension with $\Lambda$CDM to the $\lesssim 2\sigma$ level, nevertheless at a price of increasing $\tau_{\rm reio}$ significantly to $\sim 0.09$. Here, we use a physically motivated Gompertzian reionization framework to perform a self-consistent Bayesian analysis combining CMB (excluding large-scale polarization data), BAO, and independent measurements of the neutral hydrogen fraction evolution from quasar damping wing observations and dark pixel constraints. We derive $\tau_{\rm reio} = 0.067 \pm 0.011$ (dynamical dark energy scenario) in good agreement with cosmological analyses that would include large-scale CMB polarization data, while the inferred reionization history is consistent with multiple observational constraints. Our analysis recovers a preference for dynamical dark energy at the $\gtrapprox2\sigma$ level. These results demonstrate that astrophysical probes of reionization independently recover the optical depth required by CMB polarization measurements, suggesting that potential systematics in large-scale polarization alone are unlikely to fully explain the emerging preference for dynamical dark energy.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 46 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.13423 , archivePrefix =. 2604.13423 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.13423

  2. [2]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Five parameters are all you need (in CDM). arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2405.13680 , archivePrefix =. 2405.13680 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.13680

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Neural network emulation of reionization to constrain new physics with early- and late-time probes. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/j92y-wbtn , archivePrefix =. 2503.11261 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization history. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628897 , archivePrefix =. 1605.03507 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    A new parameterization of the reionisation history. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526543 , archivePrefix =. 1509.02785 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Parametrizing the Reionization History with the Redshift Midpoint, Duration, and Asymmetry. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aabff0 , archivePrefix =. 1804.00672 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Addressing Tensions in CDM Cosmology by an Increase in the Optical Depth to Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/6r54-8lv4 , archivePrefix =. 2504.16932 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Turning a negative neutrino mass into a positive optical depth. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/6vd2-rbfn , archivePrefix =. 2504.21813 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Uniting the Observed Dynamical Dark Energy Preference with the Discrepancies in _ m and H _ 0 across Cosmological Probes. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc4da , archivePrefix =. 2412.04430 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  10. [10]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14738 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 , archivePrefix =. 1907.12875 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and CDM parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/062 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14452 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on neutrino physics from DESI DR2 BAO and DR1 full shape. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/w9pk-xsk7 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14744 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological preference for a negative neutrino mass. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083507 , archivePrefix =. 2407.07878 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06205 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    SRoll2: an improved mapmaking approach to reduce large-scale systematic effects in the Planck High Frequency Instrument legacy maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834882 , archivePrefix =. 1901.11386 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    SRoll3: A neural network approach to reduce large-scale systematic effects in the Planck High-Frequency Instrument maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040152 , archivePrefix =. 2012.09702 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Reionization optical depth determination from Planck HFI data with ten percent accuracy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936630 , archivePrefix =. 1908.09856 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  19. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints from a joint DESI DR1 Full-Shape and DR2 BAO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.18761 , archivePrefix =. 2602.18761 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.18761

  20. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Cosmological constraints from the DESI DR1 Bispectrum Full-Shape and DR2 BAO. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.23936 , archivePrefix =. 2606.23936 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.23936

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3710 , archivePrefix =. 2110.00584 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    21CMFAST: a fast, seminumerical simulation of the high-redshift 21-cm signal. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17731.x , archivePrefix =. 1003.3878 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    The Sherwood-Relics simulations: overview and impact of patchy reionization and pressure smoothing on the intergalactic medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3761 , archivePrefix =. 2207.13098 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Introducing the Lumina project: large-volume radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of the epochs of hydrogen and helium reionization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.15310 , archivePrefix =. 2605.15310 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.15310

  25. [25]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Raising the reionization optical depth with inflationary CMB features. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.20795 , archivePrefix =. 2606.20795 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.20795

  26. [26]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Fireworks at Cosmic Dawn: relieving BAO-CMB tensions with the Pop III.1 Flash. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.19459 , archivePrefix =. 2606.19459 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.19459

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b , archivePrefix =. 2205.10939 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A Detailed Description of the CamSpec Likelihood Pipeline and a Reanalysis of the Planck High Frequency Maps. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1910.00483 , archivePrefix =. 1910.00483 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.00483 1910

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06 , archivePrefix =. 2304.05202 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07773 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Updated dark pixel fraction constraints on reionization's end from the Lyman-series forests of XQR - 30. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1862 , archivePrefix =. 2510.25829 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    IGM damping wing constraints on reionization from covariance reconstruction of two z 7 QSOs. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac825 , archivePrefix =. 2112.04091 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    IGM damping wing constraints on the tail end of reionization from the enlarged XQR-30 sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1080 , archivePrefix =. 2404.12585 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Damping wings in the Lyman- forest: A model-independent measurement of the neutral fraction at 5.4 < z < 6.1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450798 , archivePrefix =. 2405.12273 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Chronicling the Reionization History at 6 z 7 with Emergent Quasar Damping Wings. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4888 , archivePrefix =. 2401.10328 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Rapid late-time reionization: constraints and cosmological implications. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.21069 , archivePrefix =. 2508.21069 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.21069

  37. [37]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    A New Constraint on the Optical Depth from the Reionization History Independent of CMB Large-Scale E-Mode Polarization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.09644 , archivePrefix =. 2601.09644 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09644

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The Impact of Cosmic Variance on Inferences of Global Neutral Fraction Derived from Ly Luminosity Functions during Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd179 , archivePrefix =. 2305.04949 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/057 , archivePrefix =. 2005.05290 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Part II: Approximation schemes

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 , archivePrefix =. 1104.2933 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833886 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06210 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Model-independent evidence in favour of an end to reionization by z 6. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2449 , archivePrefix =. 1411.5375 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Signatures of inhomogeneous dark matter annihilation on 21-cm. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/69jk-m5xg , archivePrefix =. 2312.17499 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    The effects of dark matter annihilation and dark matter-baryon velocity offsets at Cosmic Dawn. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/081 , archivePrefix =. 2411.10626 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    CMB limits on decaying dark matter beyond the ionization threshold. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123529 , archivePrefix =. 2408.13305 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Effects of primordial black holes on IGM history. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/060 , archivePrefix =. 2510.00246 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Gravitational ionization by Schwarzschild primordial black holes. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/4p67-rxhp , archivePrefix =. 2601.05935 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of the Lyman-alpha Luminosity Function during Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1104 , archivePrefix =. 2101.01205 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Census of Ly Emission from 600 Galaxies at z = 5-14: Evolution of the Ly Luminosity Function and a Late Sharp Cosmic Reionization. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adc690 , archivePrefix =. 2501.05834 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on the z 6 - 13 intergalactic medium from JWST spectroscopy of Lyman-alpha damping wings in galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553820 , archivePrefix =. 2501.11702 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Probing the Cosmic Reionization History with JWST: Gunn-Peterson and Ly Damping Wing Absorption at 4.5 < z < 13. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae232b , archivePrefix =. 2504.04683 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Reionization and the Hubble constant: correlations in the Cosmic Microwave Background. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/082 , archivePrefix =. 2503.05691 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic tensions indirectly correlate with reionization optical depth. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/14tf-4nk2 , archivePrefix =. 2509.09678 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =

    NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)216 , archivePrefix =. 2410.05380 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies

    XXIV. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. In a letter to Francis Baily, Esq. FRS &c , author=. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London , number=. 1825 , publisher=

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Updated Cosmological Constraints in Extended Parameter Space with Planck PR4, DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, and Supernovae: Dynamical Dark Energy, Neutrino Masses, Lensing Anomaly, and the Hubble Tension. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8c26 , archivePrefix =. 2409.13022 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Cosmology in Extended Parameter Space with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A 2 + Detection of Nonzero Neutrino Masses with an Update on Dynamical Dark Energy and Lensing Anomaly. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade1cc , archivePrefix =. 2504.15340 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2041

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological Constraints on Nonphantom Dynamical Dark Energy with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A 3 + Lensing Anomaly. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1a64 , archivePrefix =. 2509.26144 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2041

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Updated constraints on infrared cutoff models and implications for large-scale CMB anomalies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/06/019 , archivePrefix =. 2602.16659 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2026