Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 42 references

Anisotropic Spin Polarization and magnetic spin hall effect in Ferromagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-30 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Strong spin-orbit coupling makes both spin polarization and magnetic spin Hall conductivity in ferromagnets highly anisotropic with magnetization and field direction.

desk verdict Solid FePt transport calculation that maps joint mag–field anisotropy of spin polarization and MSHE, with a real but partial hole in the SOC-origin claim for the polarization half. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27016 v1 pith:OUIKOJCK submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.comp-ph

Jiabin Wang , Zhenhua Zhang , Wancheng Zhang , Jianxiong Zhao , Yong Liu , Rui Xiong , Zhihong Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.comp-ph
keywords magneticspinHalleffectpolarizationanisotropyspin-orbitcouplingFePtferromagnetsstraintunabilityfield-freespintronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that in a strong spin-orbit-coupled ferromagnet such as FePt, the overall spin polarization of a charge current and the magnetic spin Hall conductivity both change markedly when the magnetization is tilted off the easy axis or when the electric field is rotated relative to the crystal axes. The anisotropy is traced mainly to spin-orbit coupling rather than to crystalline symmetry alone, as a comparison with weakly spin-orbit-coupled CrO2 confirms. Tensile strain further enlarges the angular oscillation of the magnetic spin Hall conductivity. The work therefore presents strong-SOC ferromagnets as materials in which intrinsic anisotropy can be used to generate orientation-dependent spin currents and to enable field-free spintronic switching without external magnets.

What carries the argument

The time-reversal-odd magnetic spin Hall conductivity component σ_zx^{z,odd} evaluated in a local frame with magnetization along x0, together with the spin-polarization ratio formed from the spin-diagonal conductivities; both quantities are computed from first-principles Wannier linear response at fixed scattering rate and shown to inherit Fermi-surface anisotropy from SOC.

What would settle it

Measure the angular dependence of the out-of-plane spin current (or the effective spin-torque efficiency) in an L10-FePt film while rotating either magnetization or current direction at fixed temperature; if the observed 180-degree oscillation amplitude does not track the calculated σ_zx^{z,odd} trend, or if a weakly SOC uniaxial ferromagnet shows comparable anisotropy, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Both the overall spin polarization during charge transport and the magnetic spin Hall conductivity in FePt exhibit pronounced anisotropy when magnetization is tilted from the crystallographic easy axis or the electric field is rotated relative to the crystal axes; the effect is driven primarily by spin-orbit coupling and is progressively enhanced by tensile strain.

Load-bearing premise

A single constant scattering rate matched to bulk resistivity is assumed to describe lifetime broadening for every magnetization and field orientation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Magnetization tilt away from [001] can turn on a previously symmetry-forbidden magnetic spin Hall component usable for field-free switching of perpendicular magnets.
  • Rotating the in-plane electric-field direction at fixed magnetization produces a 180-degree periodic modulation of spin-current amplitude that can be read electrically.
  • Equibiaxial tensile strain of a few percent systematically enlarges that angular oscillation, offering a mechanical knob for spin-current amplitude.
  • Device layouts that align current and easy axis can exploit the higher spin polarization reported for the in-plane configuration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same SOC-driven Fermi-surface distortion governs interfacial spin-orbit torque, the anisotropy reported here should appear as an angular variation of damping-like torque efficiency in FePt-based bilayers.
  • Altermagnets and noncollinear antiferromagnets already show T-odd spin-current anisotropy; the FePt results suggest a continuous materials spectrum in which net magnetization and SOC strength trade off against each other.
  • Lifetime anisotropy (neglected here) would most strongly affect the high-tilt, high-strain regime where the calculated oscillation is largest, so angle-resolved resistivity measurements would be a natural next check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles (VASP + Wannier linear-response) calculations of spin-dependent transport in L10-FePt. It finds that (i) the overall spin polarization of the charge current and (ii) the magnetic (time-reversal-odd) spin Hall conductivity both vary strongly when the magnetization is tilted from the [001] easy axis or when the electric-field direction is rotated relative to the crystal axes. A comparison with weaker-SOC CrO2 and symmetry analysis of the conductivity tensors are used to attribute the anisotropy primarily to spin-orbit coupling. Equibiaxial tensile strain is further shown to enlarge the angular oscillation amplitude of the magnetic spin Hall conductivity. The authors position strong-SOC ferromagnets as a materials platform for anisotropic spin-current generation and field-free spin-orbit-torque devices.

Significance. If the reported anisotropies and their SOC origin hold, the work supplies a concrete materials route—already technologically relevant L10-FePt—toward electrically and strain-tunable, field-free spin currents without requiring altermagnets or noncollinear antiferromagnets. The symmetry tables, the explicit angular maps of σ^z,odd_zx, and the strain series are useful quantitative benchmarks for the community. The calculation pipeline is standard and reproducible in principle. The central claim, however, bundles two observables whose microscopic origins are not equally secured; clarifying that distinction would substantially strengthen the paper’s impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Discussion; FIG. 2; Tables SI–II] Discussion (symmetry analysis preceding FIG. 2) and Tables SI–II: the manuscript states that the longitudinal T-odd components σ^z,odd_xx, σ^z,odd_yy, σ^z,odd_zz “persist even without SOC” and “originate from magnetic exchange interactions rather than from relativistic effects.” FIG. 2(a,b) spin-polarization ratios are built precisely from these components (P ~ |σ^z,odd_aa|/σ_aa and the three-component P). L10 FePt is already tetragonal, so σ_xx ≠ σ_zz and an angular variation of P are allowed by crystal symmetry plus exchange alone. The only control offered is CrO2 (FIG. S3), which differs in crystal class, band filling and chemistry, not solely in SOC strength. No FePt SOC-off (or SOC-scaled) angular curves for P are reported. Consequently the abstract/conclusion claim that SOC is “the key driver of the large anisotropy” is secured for the transverse MSHE but not for spin-polarization
  2. [Methodology; FIG. 2–4] Methodology and Discussion around FIG. 2–4: a single constant scattering rate Γ = 100 meV, fixed once from experimental resistivity, is used for all magnetization and field orientations and all strains. The MSHE is known to be dominated by intraband (Fermi-surface) contributions that scale as 1/Γ; if the actual lifetime is anisotropic or energy-dependent under magnetization tilt or strain, both the reported angular amplitudes and the strain-enhancement trend can change magnitude or even sign. At minimum the authors should (i) show the angular MSHE and P for a range of Γ (they already do this only for one cut in FIG. 3(b)) and (ii) discuss whether a magnetization- or strain-dependent Γ would reverse the qualitative conclusions.
  3. [Methodology; Sec. (i) of SM] Methodology: the spin Hall conductivity is obtained with WANNIER-LINEAR-RESPONSE, yet the main text and the visible Supplemental description give no k-mesh density for the Wannier interpolation, no Wannier-spread or band-window convergence, and no error estimate on the conductivities. Because the claimed anisotropies are quantitative (factor-of-two-scale variations, strain-enhanced amplitudes), a short convergence table (or a statement that the angular trends are stable under doubling of the interpolation mesh) is load-bearing for reproducibility.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title; Abstract] Title and abstract: “magnetic spin hall effect” should be consistently capitalized (“Hall”).
  2. [Front matter] Keywords section is empty (“Keywords:” with no entries).
  3. [References] Reference list numbering is inconsistent with in-text citations (e.g., VASP papers appear as [25-26] then [24]–[28] out of order; SM citation [30] points to an unrelated Miron Nat. Mater. paper). Clean up the bibliography.
  4. [FIG. 1] FIG. 1(c) schematic of Fermi-surface distortion under magnetization rotation is qualitative only; a computed FS cut for two magnetization directions would make the topology argument more convincing.
  5. [Discussion; FIG. 1(e,f)] Notation: the local-frame conductivity is written both as σ^0_z zx and σ^z,odd_zx; a single consistent symbol set would help the reader.
  6. [FIG. 4; Discussion] The strain series (FIG. 4) reports equibiaxial tensile strain up to 4% without stating whether internal coordinates and the c/a ratio were re-relaxed at each strain; a one-sentence clarification is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: anisotropy and strain trends are outputs of DFT/Wannier transport, not forced by fitted inputs or self-citation loops.

full rationale

The central claims (angular anisotropy of spin polarization P and of magnetic spin Hall conductivity σz,odd_zx in FePt, plus strain enhancement of the MSHE oscillation) are obtained from first-principles DFT band structures plus Wannier linear-response conductivities evaluated at fixed lifetime broadening. Γ = 100 meV is chosen once to match the experimental resistivity of L10-FePt and is then held constant across magnetization angles, field angles, and strain; the reported angular and strain dependences are therefore not re-fitted quantities and are not forced by construction from that single scalar. Symmetry tables (SI–II) and the CrO2 comparison are used as supporting checks, not as uniqueness theorems that close a logical loop. Self-citations [36,37] concern strain engineering in RuO2 and supply only background motivation that strain can reshape bands; they do not underwrite the FePt transport results. No equation equates a claimed prediction to its own defining input. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained computational physics, not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT-GGA total energies and on the constant-Γ Kubo linear-response formula implemented in WANNIER-LINEAR-RESPONSE. One free parameter (Γ) is fixed to experiment; no new physical entities are postulated. Domain assumptions are the usual ones for metallic ferromagnets at T = 0 with phenomenological disorder broadening.

free parameters (1)
  • scattering rate Γ = 100 meV
    Set to 100 meV to reproduce experimental resistivity of L10-FePt; held fixed for all angles and strains. Controls the absolute scale and, through the intraband dominance of MSHE, the relative size of the anisotropic signal.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional plus PAW pseudopotentials adequately describe the FePt band structure and SOC near the Fermi level.
    Invoked throughout Methodology; no hybrid-functional or GW check is provided.
  • domain assumption A single isotropic lifetime broadening Γ captures disorder effects for every magnetization and current orientation.
    Stated when Γ = 100 meV is introduced (Discussion, FIG. 2); underpins all angular and strain plots.
  • standard math Magnetic spin Hall conductivity is obtained from the standard Kubo linear-response formula evaluated with Wannier interpolation.
    Methodology cites WANNIER-LINEAR-RESPONSE; conventional in the field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic Spin Polarization and magnetic spin hall effect in Ferromagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OUIKOJCK

@misc{pith2026260727016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic Spin Polarization and magnetic spin hall effect in Ferromagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OUIKOJCK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27016}
}
read the original abstract

Spin-dependent transport in ferromagnets underpins the development of high-density spintronic memories. Spin-dependent transport in strong spin-orbit-coupled ferromagnets exhibits a significant anisotropy. Both the overall spin polarization during charge transport and the magnetic spin Hall conductivity are found to exhibit pronounced anisotropy when the magnetization is tilted away from the crystallographic easy axis or when the electric field is rotated relative to the crystal axes. These anisotropic responses originate primarily from spin-orbit coupling, which is identified as the key driver of the large anisotropy observed in ferromagnet. Furthermore, strain tunability of the magnetic spin Hall anisotropy is demonstrated, with tensile strain progressively enhancing the oscillatory amplitude of the spin Hall conductivity. These findings establish strong spin-orbit-coupled ferromagnets as a platform for anisotropic spin-current generation and field-free spintronic devices that exploit intrinsic material anisotropy for improved performance and energy efficiency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27016 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Introduction Spin-transport phenomena in magnetic systems are critical to spintronics, as they enable the generation of spin -polarized charge currents and order -parameter-tunable spin currents, which underpin a wide range of magnetic memory and logic devices [1- 3]. Such spin currents can be generated via two distinct mechanisms: the conventional spin H...

  2. [2]

    Methodology First-principles calculations were performed within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) using the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (V ASP) [25-26]. The ion -electron interaction was described by pseudopotentials, and the exchange - correlation functional was treated with the Perdew -Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) parametrization of the ...

  3. [3]

    The translation - time‑reversal or parity -time symmetry preserves Kramers degeneracy, leaving the spin‑up and spin‑down bands degenerate without spin splitting [see Fig

    Discussion In conventional collinear antiferromagnets, the two sublattice moments are strictly antiparallel, yielding a vanishing net magnetization [31,32]. The translation - time‑reversal or parity -time symmetry preserves Kramers degeneracy, leaving the spin‑up and spin‑down bands degenerate without spin splitting [see Fig. 1(a)]. Altermagnets combine t...

  4. [4]

    For the time‑reversal‑odd ( 𝒯‑odd) sector, the components obey y,odd x,odd zy zx = and y,odd x,odd zy zx = , which also disappear when SOC is neglected

    direction, the time‑reversal‑even (𝒯‑even) tensor components satisfy the relations xy zy zx =− , xy yz xz =− , and zz xy yz =− ; all these components vanish in the absence of SOC. For the time‑reversal‑odd ( 𝒯‑odd) sector, the components obey y,odd x,odd zy zx = and y,odd x,odd zy zx = , which also disappear when SOC is neglected. This confirms ...

  5. [5]

    The interplay between the electric -field and magnetization orientations is systematically studied

    configuration. The interplay between the electric -field and magnetization orientations is systematically studied. In Fig. 3(a), the magnetic spin Hall conductivity z,odd zxσ (evaluated at a scattering rate Γ = 100 meV) is shown to vary with the magnetization direction for a fixed electric field. Conversely, for a given magnetization orientation, z,odd zx...

  6. [6]

    The results reveal a rich phenomenology governed by crystalline symmetry, spin-orbit coupling, and Fermi -surface topology

    Conclusion In summary, the anisotropic spin polarization and magnetic spin Hall effect in strong spin-orbit-coupled ferromagnetic systems are systematically investigated, taking FePt as a prototypical example. The results reveal a rich phenomenology governed by crystalline symmetry, spin-orbit coupling, and Fermi -surface topology. By comparing with the w...

  7. [7]

    G. Ji, Y . Zhang, Y . Chai, and T. Nan, Recent progress on controlling spin -orbit torques by materials design, npj Spintronics 2, 56 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. Železný, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    L. Liu, C. F. Pai, Y . Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum, Science (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Hirsch, Spin hall effect, Phys

    J. Hirsch, Spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1834 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Sinova, D

    J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Universal intrinsic spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126603 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    Kimata, H

    M. Kimata, H. Chen, K. Kondou, S. Sugimoto, P. K. Muduli, M. Ikhlas, Y . Omori, T. Tomita, A. H. MacDonald, and S. Nakatsuji, Magnetic and magnetic inverse spin Hall effects in a non-collinear antiferromagnet, Nature 565, 627 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    A. Mook, R. R. Neumann, A. Johansson, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, Origin of the magnetic spin Hall effect: Spin current vorticity in the Fermi sea, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023065 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Salemi, M

    L. Salemi, M. Berritta, and P. M. Oppeneer, Quantitative comparison of electrically induced spin and orbital polarizations in heavy -metal/3 d -metal bilayers, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 074407 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Salemi, and P

    L. Salemi, and P. M. Oppeneer, Theory of magnetic spin and orbital Hall and Nernst effects in bulk ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 106, 024410 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P.-J. Zermatten, M. V . Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection, Nature 476, 189 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    L. Liu , O. Lee, T. Gudmundsen, D. Ralph, and R. Buhrman, Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the Spin Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    M. Zhu, X. Li, F. Zheng, J. Dong, Y . Zhou, K. Wu, and J. Zhang, Crystal facet orientation and temperature dependence of charge and spin Hall effects in noncollinear antiferromagnets: A first -principles investigation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 054420 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    C. Cao, S. Chen, R.-C. Xiao, Z. Zhu, G. Yu, Y . Wang, X. Qiu, L. Liu, T. Zhao, and D.-F. Shao, Anomalous spin current anisotropy in a noncollinear antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 14, 5873 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Zhang, W

    X.-P. Zhang, W. Feng, R. -W. Zhang, X. Fan, X. Wang, and Y . Yao, Theory of anisotropic magnetoresistance in altermagnets and its applications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 266706 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    M. Dou, X. Wang, and L. Tao, Anisotropic spin-polarized conductivity in collinear altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 224423 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Dolan, J

    E. Dolan, J. Mencos, W. S. Torres, M. Cosset-Chéneau, J.-P. Attané, L. Vila, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Measuring the magnetic anisotropy of the spin Hall effect and spin relaxation length in nickel and permalloy via electrical spin injection, Phys. Rev. B 112, 134404 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Garello, I

    K. Garello, I. M. Miron, C. O. Avci, F. Freimuth, Y . Mokrousov, S. Blügel, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P. Gambardella, Symmetry and magnitude of spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 587 - 593 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    Okamoto, N

    S. Okamoto, N. Kikuchi, O. Kitakami, T. Miyazaki, Y . Shimada, and K. Fukamichi, Chemical-order-dependent magnetic anisotropy and exchange stiffness constant of FePt (001) epitaxial films, Phys. Rev. B 66, 024413 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    J. Chen, B. Lim, and J. Wang, Controlling the crystallographic orientation and the axis of magnetic anisotropy in L 1 FePt films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1848 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, Y . Mokrousov, and I. Souza, Role of spin-flip transitions in the anomalous Hall effect of FePt alloy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 117202 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Zhang, S

    H. Zhang, S. Blügel, and Y . Mokrousov, Anisotropic intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in ordered 3d Pt alloys, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter and Materials Physics 84, 024401 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. J. P. r. B. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane -wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  23. [31]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  24. [32]

    Kresse, and D

    G. Kresse, and D. J. P. r. b. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  26. [34]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. J. P. r. l. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y .-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised Wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    Mihai Miron, G

    I. Mihai Miron, G. Gaudin, S. Auffret, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, S. Pizzini, J. V ogel, and P. J. N. m. Gambardella, Current -driven spin torque induced by the Rashba effect in a ferromagnetic metal layer, Nat. Mater. 9, 230 (2010). [31]X. Chen, S. Shi, G. Shi, X. Fan, C. Song, X...

    2010

  29. [37]

    Grzybowski, P

    M. Grzybowski, P. Wadley, K. Edmonds, R. Beardsley, V . Hills, R. Campion, B. Gallagher, J. S. Chauhan, V . Novak, and T. Jungwirth, Imaging current-induced switching of antiferromagnetic domains in CuMnAs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 057701 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, and N. Wind, Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO 2, Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4883 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González -Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time - reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Zheng, K

    S. Zheng, K. Meng, Q. Liu, J. Chen, J. Miao, X. Xu, and Y . Jiang, Disorder dependent spin -orbit torques in L10 FePt single layer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    J. Wang, W. Zhang, Y . Liu, J. Hu, Z. Zhang, R. Xiong, and Z. Lu, Strain-engineered modulation of non -relativistic altermagnetic spin splitting in rutile RuO 2, Mater. Today Phys. 63, 102081 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Zhang, M

    W. Zhang, M. Zheng, Y . Liu, Z. Zhang, R. Xiong, and Z. Lu, Strain -induced nonrelativistic altermagnetic spin splitting effect, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024415 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.