Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Near a winding-number drop of two, first-detection probabilities show long-lived temporal interference fringes from a pair of quasi-dark states.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-30 12:48 UTC pith:KAKOBSGV

load-bearing objection Solid incremental advance: w→w−2 really does produce long-lived two-mode temporal fringes, protected by bipartite symmetry, with clean asymptotics and numerics. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27045 v1 pith:KAKOBSGV submitted 2026-07-29 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

Temporal Interference from Topological Transitions in Monitored Quantum Dynamics

Qingyuan Wang , Ruoyu Yin , Eli Barkai This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph
keywords monitored quantum dynamicsfirst detectionwinding numberdark statestemporal interferencebipartite symmetrysurvival operatorquantum recurrence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When a quantum system is watched stroboscopically for return to a target state, the mean return step is an integer winding number w that jumps at resonant sampling times. This paper shows that jumps of the form w to w-2 create two long-lived quasi-dark modes whose equal-weight superposition produces high-visibility oscillations in the first-detection probability, riding on an extremely slow envelope. The oscillations are protected by bipartite (particle-hole) symmetry of the Hamiltonian, which forces matched spectral weights and conjugate phases. The result is a concrete recipe: tune the measurement period near a pair-merging resonance, and the return statistics freeze into a temporal two-slit pattern rather than a plain exponential tail. A sympathetic reader cares because the fringes directly report energy centroids and detunings of the underlying Hamiltonian, and because the same topology already quantizes the mean return time.

Core claim

Close to a topological transition w→w−2, the late-time first-detection probability is controlled by a pair of survival-operator eigenvalues with equal moduli just below unity and equal spectral weights, yielding Fn ∼ 4(1−|ξ|²)²|ξ|²ⁿ cos²[n(θ1−θ2)/2 + β]. The envelope decays extremely slowly while the cosine supplies temporal interference fringes; bipartite symmetry guarantees the weight matching. This contrasts with the single-mode monotonic exponential decay near w→w−1 transitions.

What carries the argument

The survival operator S = (1−|xT⟩⟨xT|)U(τ) and its eigenvalues inside the unit disk. Near w→w−2, two eigenvalues approach the unit circle together; their phase difference sets the fringe frequency and their common modulus sets the slow envelope, with spectral weights fixed by an electrostatic charge picture of the unitary phase factors.

Load-bearing premise

The claim needs the Hamiltonian’s spectrum to be symmetric under energy sign flip, and the two nearly merged phase pairs to sit well apart from all other levels, so the two slow modes really have equal weights and dominate alone.

What would settle it

On a bipartite graph (hypercube or odd-length tight-binding chain), measure the first-return distribution at a sampling time slightly detuned from a known w→w−2 resonance: the late-time Fn must show slow envelope decay with oscillations at the predicted frequency (energy-centroid difference or detuning-linear slow frequency); the same protocol near a w→w−1 resonance must give only monotonic exponential decay.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Plotting mean return step versus sampling time locates w→w−2 jumps; tuning just off those points yields observable long-lived temporal fringes.
  • Fringe frequency reports either the difference of pair energy centroids (two-pair merging) or a detuning-linear slow frequency set by target-state overlaps (three-phase merging with a zero mode).
  • Envelope lifetime diverges as the square of the inverse detuning from resonance, so arbitrarily slow decay is available by finer tuning.
  • Platforms already used for monitored quantum walks (trapped ions, photonics, superconducting circuits) can test the predicted oscillation-versus-monotonic dichotomy by choice of τ.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Environmental dephasing will cut off the envelope lifetime before the ideal detuning limit is reached, so the practical visibility window is set by the competition between detuning and coherence time.
  • The same two-mode mechanism should appear in any monitored dynamics whose unitary spectrum is particle-hole symmetric, not only nearest-neighbor graph walks.
  • Many-body extensions could turn the pair of quasi-dark states into a diagnostic of spectral symmetry breaking under interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies first-detection statistics under stroboscopic projective monitoring and shows that, near topological transitions of the winding number w → w−2, the long-time first-detection probability Fn is controlled by a pair of quasi-dark eigenvalues of the survival operator S with matched moduli |ξ| ≃ 1. This yields an extremely slow envelope decay superimposed by temporal interference fringes, Fn ∼ 4(1−|ξ|²)²|ξ|²ⁿ cos²[n(θ1−θ2)/2 + β] (Eq. 5), in contrast to the single-mode monotonic exponential decay near w → w−1. The authors link the oscillation frequency to near-merging of unitary phase factors e^{-iEkτ}, derive perturbative envelopes and frequencies for two scenarios (two pair mergers; three-phase merger including E = 0) under bipartite spectral symmetry (Eqs. 8–11), and support the asymptotics with numerics on the d = 4 hypercube and an L = 7 tight-binding chain, together with an electrostatic charge map for the spectrum of S.

Significance. If correct, the work gives a concrete, experimentally addressable signature of monitored topological transitions beyond the already-known quantization ⟨n⟩ = w: long-lived, high-visibility temporal fringes whose frequency is set by Hamiltonian energy centroids (or by detuning in the three-charge case). The two-mode asymptotics, the electrostatic mapping of unitary phases to eigenvalues of S, and the explicit spectral weights in the End Matter are technically solid and falsifiable; the hypercube and odd-length chain examples provide clear, reproducible targets for trapped-ion, photonic, and superconducting platforms already used for monitored quantum walks. The bipartite-symmetry route to matched weights is a genuine structural insight rather than a fine-tuned special case, and the contrast with w → w−1 is cleanly drawn.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Hamiltonian origin of temporal interference] Abstract and opening claim of a “generic quantum system”: the body repeatedly requires bipartite (particle-hole) spectral symmetry of H, plus isolation of the two nearly merged unitary phase-factor pairs from all other phases, to guarantee r1 = r2, conjugate phases, and clean two-mode dominance in Eqs. (5), (8) and (10). Without those conditions the high-visibility long-lived fringes need not appear. The abstract and the phrase “generic quantum system” should be aligned with the scoped assumptions stated in “Hamiltonian origin of temporal interference” and the merging-pair sections, so that the central claim is not overstated relative to the derivations.
  2. [Merging of pairs of phase factors; Merging of three phase factors; Appendix A] Eqs. (8)–(11) and the coefficients λ, η, σ, λ′, σ are stated as leading-order perturbative results whose detailed derivation is deferred to the SM. For a load-bearing claim (envelope lifetime ∼ 1/(λ(Δ̃Eτ)²) and the frequency shift δ = 2η Δ̃Eτ), the main text or End Matter should include at least a short sketch of the two-charge (or three-charge) force-balance expansion from Eq. (14)/(15), so that a reader can verify the scaling without the SM. The electrostatic picture in Appendix A already sets this up; one additional paragraph connecting charge separation to |ξ| and Δθ would close the gap.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1; Eq. (5)] Fig. 1(b) and Eq. (5): the phase β is defined via Eq. (18) in the End Matter; a brief forward reference in the Fig. 1 caption would help readers who have not yet reached the appendix.
  2. [Eqs. (8)–(11)] Notation: the reduced detuning is written ]ΔEτ in several places (apparently a typesetting artifact for Δ̃Eτ). Please unify to a single, readable symbol throughout Eqs. (8)–(11) and the surrounding text.
  3. [Fig. 2; Discussion] Fig. 2(a): the jumps in ⟨n⟩ = w are the operational way to locate transitions experimentally; stating the numerical tolerance or smoothing expected under finite sampling would strengthen the “conditions for optimal observations” claim in the abstract.
  4. [Appendix D; Appendix E] Appendix D/E: giving the explicit numerical Pk sets for the d = 4 hypercube and the L = 7 chain (or pointing to a short table) would make the λ, η, σ values in the figures fully reproducible from the main document alone.
  5. [Discussion] References: the discussion of experimental platforms is appropriate; a slightly more specific pointer to which existing monitored-walk protocols already scan τ through resonances would help experimental groups.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: two-mode interference asymptotics are derived from the spectrum of S near charge mergers, not forced by definition or self-citation.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: (i) ϕ(n) is the matrix element of the survival operator S (Eq. 2); (ii) its long-time form is fixed by the eigenvalues of S closest to the unit circle (Eqs. 3–4); (iii) a w→w−2 jump occurs when two pairs of unitary phases merge, driving two eigenvalues of S toward |ξ|≃1 (electrostatic/charge picture, Appendix A, rooted in Grünbaum et al.); (iv) bipartite spectral symmetry of H forces matched weights Pk=Ppartner and conjugate phases, yielding equal mode amplitudes r1=r2 and the cos² fringes of Eqs. (5), (8), (10). ⟨n⟩=w is taken from external work (Grünbaum et al.) only as a diagnostic to locate transitions, not to shape Fn. Self-citations (dark states, w→w−1 monotonic decay, prior perturbation tools) supply background and the single-mode contrast; they do not define or force the w→w−2 fringe structure. Numerics compare exact Eq. (2) to the asymptotic formulas without fitting the oscillation form to the same data. No step reduces the claimed prediction to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 2 invented entities

The load-bearing scaffolding is standard finite-dimensional quantum mechanics plus the established monitored-walk formalism (survival operator S, first-detection amplitude, winding number from Grünbaum). No new particles or forces. Free parameters are only the hand-chosen detunings used to illustrate numerics near resonance, not fits that define the claim. Invented language (bright/dark, temporal slits) names spectral objects already defined by S.

free parameters (2)
  • detuning δτ (e.g. τ=π/3−0.01, π/4−0.01, √2 π−0.02) = O(0.01–0.02) below resonant τ
    Sampling times are chosen by hand slightly off exact resonance to make |ξ| close to 1 and display long-lived fringes; they illustrate the asymptotic regime rather than being fitted to external data.
  • hopping amplitude γ = 1
    Set to 1 by convention in both models; overall energy/time unit, not fitted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Mean detected recurrence time equals the integer winding number ⟨n⟩=w (quantum Kac lemma / Grünbaum et al.).
    Used throughout to identify topological transitions as jumps in ⟨n⟩; taken from cited prior work, not re-proved here.
  • standard math First-detection amplitude admits spectral expansion over eigenvalues of the survival operator S=(1−|x_T⟩⟨x_T|)U(τ) inside the unit disk.
    Standard linear algebra for finite-dimensional non-unitary S; Eq. (3) and charge equation (14).
  • domain assumption Bipartite/particle-hole symmetry of H implies E↔−E and matched spectral weights P_k=P_{partner}, enabling equal mode weights near double mergers.
    Stated as the generic route to high-visibility w→w−2 interference; hypercube and chain both satisfy it.
  • standard math Near resonance, only the eigenvalues of S closest to the unit circle control large-n Fn; other modes are exponentially negligible.
    Ordinary spectral gap / dominant-pole reasoning used to pass from Eq. (3) to Eqs. (4)–(5).
  • domain assumption Projective stroboscopic monitoring with fixed period τ; ℏ=1; finite-dimensional Hilbert space with ∑Fn=1.
    Defines the physical setting of the entire paper (Introduction and General formalism).
invented entities (2)
  • Temporal interference fringes from a pair of quasi-dark modes at w→w−2 independent evidence
    purpose: Name and organize the long-lived oscillatory Fn pattern as two-slit interference in detection time.
    Not a new physical substance; it is a spectral phenomenon of existing S eigenvalues. Independent handle is the predicted τ-tuned oscillation frequency set by energy centroids or detuning.
  • Electrostatic charge mapping of unitary phases to eigenvalues of S independent evidence
    purpose: Geometric tool to locate when pairs of eigenvalues approach the unit circle.
    Already used in prior cited works (Grünbaum; Yin et al.); restated in End Matter Appendix A, not newly postulated here.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 18270 in / 3505 out tokens · 82673 ms · 2026-07-30T12:48:27.795339+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Temporal interference patterns can be detected with stroboscopic monitoring that treats the back action of measurements and the unitary dynamics. Previous work established that the mean detected recurrence time is integer-quantized and given by a topological invariant, a winding number $w$. When measurement periods are at resonance with the system's timescales, the winding number can abruptly change. We focus on a generic quantum system and the transition $w\to w-2$, signified by the creation of two dark states in Hilbert space, whose corresponding modes are responsible for the interference pattern. Close to the transition an extremely slow decay of the amplitude of first detection is found, superimposed by oscillations, in contrast to the monotonically exponential decay close to the case $w\to w-1$. We show how these oscillations are obtained from the symmetry of the system and find the conditions for optimal observations of the phenomenon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27045 by Eli Barkai, Qingyuan Wang, Ruoyu Yin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) First-detection probability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Mean recurrence time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (c), whereas the merging of two pairs of phase factors yields faster oscillations, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gerry and P

    C. Gerry and P. Knight,Introductory Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    Muga and C

    J. Muga and C. Leavens, Arrival time in quantum mechanics, Physics Reports338, 353 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    Yamasaki, H

    T. Yamasaki, H. Kobayashi, and H. Imai, Analysis of absorbing times of quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A68, 012302 (2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    Kempe, Discrete quantum walks hit exponentially faster, Probability theory and related fields133, 215 (2005)

    J. Kempe, Discrete quantum walks hit exponentially faster, Probability theory and related fields133, 215 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    Krovi and T

    H. Krovi and T. A. Brun, Hitting time for quantum walks on the hypercube, Phys. Rev. A73, 032341 (2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    Varbanov, H

    M. Varbanov, H. Krovi, and T. A. Brun, Hitting time for the continuous quantum walk, Phys. Rev. A78, 022324 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    F. A. Gr ¨unbaum, L. Vel´azquez, A. H. Werner, and R. F. Werner, Recurrence for Discrete Time Unitary Evolutions, Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics320, 543 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    S. Dhar, S. Dasgupta, and A. Dhar, Quantum time of arrival dis- tribution in a simple lattice model, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical48, 115304 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    S. Dhar, S. Dasgupta, A. Dhar, and D. Sen, Detection of a quantum particle on a lattice under repeated projective measure- 6 ments, Phys. Rev. A91, 062115 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    Friedman, D

    H. Friedman, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Quantum walks: The first detected passage time problem, Phys. Rev. E95, 032141 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Kulkarni and S

    M. Kulkarni and S. N. Majumdar, First detection probability in quantum resetting via random projective measurements, Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 385003 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    Tabanera-Bravo and A

    J. Tabanera-Bravo and A. Godec, Purely quantum memory in closed systems observed via imperfect measurements, Quantum 9, 1938 (2025)

    1938

  13. [13]

    Ladenburger, F

    G. Ladenburger, F. Schmolke, and E. Lutz, Universal first-passage time statistics for quantum diffusion (2025), arXiv:2511.03455 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Liu and J

    F. Liu and J. Gu, Computing large deviations of first-passage- time statistics in open quantum systems: Two methods, Phys. Rev. E113, 034123 (2026)

    2026

  15. [15]

    Lloyd, L

    S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, L. Martellini, and S. Roncallo, Quan- tum stroboscopy for time measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 110201 (2026)

    2026

  16. [16]

    Menczel, C

    P. Menczel, C. Flindt, F. Brange, F. Nori, and C. Gneiting, Full counting statistics and first-passage times in quantum marko- vian processes: Ensemble relations, metastability, and fluctua- tion theorems, PRX Quantum7, 010304 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    G. D. Vecchio Del Vecchio and S. N. Majumdar, Optimal detec- tion of quantum states via projective measurements, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical59, 035001 (2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    Ammara, V

    A. Ammara, V . Potoˇcek, M. Stefanak, and F. V . Pepe, Quantum walk on a line with absorbing boundaries, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    Krovi and T

    H. Krovi and T. A. Brun, Quantum walks with infinite hitting times, Phys. Rev. A74, 042334 (2006)

    2006

  20. [20]

    R. Yin, K. Ziegler, F. Thiel, and E. Barkai, Large fluctuations of the first detected quantum return time, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033086 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Dubey, C

    V . Dubey, C. Bernardin, and A. Dhar, Quantum dynamics under continuous projective measurements: Non-hermitian descrip- tion and the continuum-space limit, Phys. Rev. A103, 032221 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Das and S

    D. Das and S. Gupta, Quantum random walk and tight-binding model subject to projective measurements at random times, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022, 033212 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Ni and Y

    Z. Ni and Y . Zheng, First detection and tunneling time of a quantum walk, Entropy25, 1231 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Wang, R.-Y

    Y .-J. Wang, R.-Y . Yin, L.-Y . Dou, A.-N. Zhang, and X.-B. Song, Quantum first detection of a quantum walker on a perturbed ring, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013202 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Chen, Y .-J

    X.-X. Chen, Y .-J. Wang, A.-N. Zhang, Z. Meng, Q.-Y . Wu, X.- B. Song, and X.-S. Shi, Unmonitored and monitored recurrence in single-photon quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A110, 012219 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    S. Roy, S. Gupta, and G. Morigi, Causality, localization, and universality of monitored quantum walks with long-range hop- ping, Phys. Rev. E112, 044146 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Finocchiaro, G

    S. Finocchiaro, G. O. Luilli, G. Benenti, M. G. A. Paris, and L. Razzoli, Optimal quantum transport on a ring via locally monitored chiral quantum walks, Phys. Rev. E112, 054142 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Shukla, R

    K. Shukla, R. Chatterjee, and C. M. Chandrashekar, Acceler- ated first detection in discrete-time quantum walks using sharp restarts, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023069 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    ˇStefaˇn´ak, V

    M. ˇStefaˇn´ak, V . Potoˇcek, ˙I. Yalc ¸ınkaya, A. G´abris, and I. Jex, Recurrence in discrete-time quantum stochastic walks, Quan- tum10, 1982 (2026)

    1982

  30. [30]

    Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    S. Redner,A Guide to First-Passage Processes(Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    2001

  31. [31]

    H ¨anggi, P

    P. H ¨anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  32. [32]

    A. J. Bray, S. N. Majumdar, and G. Schehr, Persistence and first-passage properties in nonequilibrium systems, Advances in Physics62, 225 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    Metzler, G

    R. Metzler, G. Oshanin, and S. Redner,First-Passage Phenom- ena and Their Applications(WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    B ´enichou and R

    O. B ´enichou and R. V oituriez, From first-passage times of random walks in confinement to geometry-controlled kinetics, Physics Reports539, 225 (2014)

    2014

  35. [35]

    Misra and E

    B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, The zeno’s paradox in quan- tum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics18, 756 (1977)

    1977

  36. [36]

    Lahiri and A

    S. Lahiri and A. Dhar, Return to the origin problem for a particle on a one-dimensional lattice with quasi-zeno dynamics, Phys. Rev. A99, 012101 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Thiel and D

    F. Thiel and D. A. Kessler, Non-hermitian and zeno limit of quantum systems under rapid measurements, Phys. Rev. A102, 012218 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Q. Liu, W. Liu, K. Ziegler, and F. Chen, Engineering of zeno dynamics in integrated photonics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 103801 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Thiel, I

    F. Thiel, I. Mualem, D. Meidan, E. Barkai, and D. A. Kessler, Dark states of quantum search cause imperfect detection, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043107 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    Magniez, A

    F. Magniez, A. Nayak, P. Richter, and M. Santha, On the hitting times of quantum versus random walks, Algorithmica63, 91 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Yin and E

    R. Yin and E. Barkai, Restart expedites quantum walk hitting times, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 050802 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    E. C. King, S. Roy, F. Mattiotti, M. Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, M. Bl ¨aser, and G. Morigi, Time complexity of a moni- tored quantum search with resetting (2026), arXiv:2601.20560 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Q. Liu, K. Ziegler, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Driving quan- tum systems with periodic conditional measurements, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023129 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Kac, On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society53, 1002 (1947)

    M. Kac, On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society53, 1002 (1947)

    1947

  45. [45]

    R. Yin, Q. Wang, S. Tornow, and E. Barkai, Restart uncertainty relation for monitored quantum dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2402912121 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    Q. Wang, S. Ren, R. Yin, K. Ziegler, E. Barkai, and S. Tornow, First hitting times on a quantum computer: Tracking vs. lo- cal monitoring, topological effects, and dark states, Entropy26, 869 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    R. Yin, Q. Wang, S. Tornow, and E. Barkai, Resonances of recurrence time of monitored quantum walks, The Journal of Chemical Physics162, 244114 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    J. M. Ryan, S. Gorbaty, T. J. Kessler, M. G. Peaks, S. W. Teitsworth, and C. Noel, Experimental measurement of quan- tum first-passage time distributions, Phys. Rev. Res.8, L022025 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Q. Liu, W. Liu, Y . Jia, K. Ziegler, A. Al `u, and F. Chen, Measurement-induced photonic topological insulators, Science Advances11, eadx0595 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Stefanutti, J

    E. Stefanutti, J. Philipps, J. B ¨utow, A. Guidara, M. Nuvoli, A. Chiuri, and L. Sansoni, Implementation of leaking quan- tum walks on a photonic processor, Applied Sciences16, 1976 (2026)

    1976

  51. [51]

    S. Ma, S. Tornow, and E. Barkai, Resonances, recurrence times 7 and steady states in monitored noisy qubit systems (2026), arXiv:2603.18996 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Murauer, S

    J. Murauer, S. Tornow, and G. Perfetto, Nonequilibrium steady states induced by stochastic mid-circuit measurements and re- sets on a quantum computer (2026), arXiv:2606.19027 [quant- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Bourgain, F

    J. Bourgain, F. A. Gr ¨unbaum, L. Vel´azquez, and J. Wilkening, Quantum recurrence of a subspace and operator-valued schur functions, Communications in Mathematical Physics329, 1031 (2014)

    2014

  54. [54]

    Dittel, N

    C. Dittel, N. Neubrand, F. Thiel, and A. Buchleitner, First- detection-time statistics in many-body quantum transport, Phys. Rev. A107, 052206 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Purkayastha and A

    A. Purkayastha and A. Imparato, Interaction-induced transition in quantum many-body detection probability, Phys. Rev. A109, L020202 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Walter, G

    B. Walter, G. Perfetto, and A. Gambassi, Thermodynamic phases in first detected return times of quantum many-body sys- tems, Phys. Rev. A111, L040202 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Q. Liu, S. Tornow, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, Fraction- ally quantized recurrence detection times in monitored quan- tum many-body systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.123, e2529694123 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    Yin and H

    R. Yin and H. Zhao, Preparation of cat states in many- body eigenbasis via non-local measurement (2025), arXiv:2507.00199 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Yamamoto and R

    K. Yamamoto and R. Hamazaki, Anomalous waiting-time dis- tributions in postselection-free quantum many-body dynamics under continuous monitoring (2026), arXiv:2604.00358 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    L. A. Howard, T. J. Weinhold, F. Shahandeh, J. Combes, M. R. Vanner, A. G. White, and M. Ringbauer, Quantum hypercube states, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 020402 (2019)

    2019

  61. [61]

    Goto, High-performance fault-tolerant quantum computing with many-hypercube codes, Science Advances10, eadp6388 (2024)

    H. Goto, High-performance fault-tolerant quantum computing with many-hypercube codes, Science Advances10, eadp6388 (2024). END MA TTER Appendix A: Charge theory.—The eigenvalues of the sur- vival operatorS= (1−|x T⟩⟨xT|)U(τ)introduced in Eq. (2) can be analytically determined through an electrostatic map- ping [7]. Applying the matrix determinant lemma to...

    2024