Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Unified dark sector approaches to cosmological tensions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One scalar field controlling the dark matter mass can produce an early energy injection and an apparent late-time phantom crossing, with timing set by the cosmic abundances themselves.

desk verdict The late-time half is worth reading, but the early-time EDE peak rests on a linearization that drops the zeroth-order coupling force—the field doesn't stay frozen, so the central unification claim lacks a valid analytic basis. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27515 v1 pith:MARNO4QX submitted 2026-07-29 astro-ph.CO

Sergio Sevillano Muñoz , Mark Trodden This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO PACS 98.80.-k95.35.+d
keywords mass-varyingdarkmatterearlyenergyphantomcrossingHubbletensionS8baryonacousticoscillationscoupledquintessencesectorinteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a minimal dark sector—a single scalar field whose value determines the dark matter mass—can simultaneously produce two seemingly separate cosmological phenomena: an early injection of extra energy around matter-radiation equality, which could help resolve the Hubble tension, and an apparent crossing of the dark energy phantom divide at low redshift, which could explain recent baryon acoustic oscillation data. The central claim is that the same coupling scale governs both effects because their timing is fixed by the background abundances of matter and dark energy rather than by independent energy scales. The paper further shows that the intermediate evolution reduces the effective clustering matter density, moving the model toward lower S8. If right, this offers a single-parameter framework for addressing several cosmological tensions without introducing new long-range forces or fundamental phantom fields.

What carries the argument

The central object is the field-dependent dark matter mass m(φ). Its coupling to the scalar field sources a force that becomes important when the dark matter abundance grows around matter-radiation equality and again when the bare potential drives the field at low redshift. The effective dark energy density, defined as ρde = ρφ + ρdm − ρdm,0 a^−3, absorbs the non-standard dark matter evolution and produces the apparent phantom crossing; the analytic estimate Ωmax_de ≈ O(0.5(1−r)(m(φi)/m(φ0)−1)) sets the early peak height.

What would settle it

A full numerical computation of the CMB power spectrum for this model, including scalar perturbations and the modified dark matter continuity and Euler equations, would settle whether the early peak survives and whether S8 is genuinely lowered; if the peak disappears when the field starts at the minimum of m(φ), or if the growth suppression reverses, the unification claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish, using analytic arguments, that a mass-varying dark matter model with one bare potential V(φ) and one coupling scale M can generate an early dark-energy-like peak near matter-radiation equality and a late-time apparent phantom crossing near matter-dark-energy equality. The early peak's amplitude is set by the ratio m(φi)/m(φ0) − 1, its timing by the curvature of m(φ), and the late-time crossing is driven by the bare potential pushing the field at low redshift—exponential potentials doing this most naturally. Since both effects stem from the same mass function m(φ), the same range of M controls both, and the timing tracks the background evolution rather than separate ene

Load-bearing premise

The early energy peak requires the scalar field to start the radiation era displaced from the minimum of the dark matter mass function (m(φi) > m(φ0)), and the paper does not derive this displacement from the model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, the Hubble tension and the preference for evolving dark energy could be explained without invoking phantom fields that violate the null energy condition.
  • The same coupling scale M would control both early and late effects, reducing the timing coincidence inherent in separate early-dark-energy and phantom models.
  • The model predicts a suppressed growth of dark matter perturbations during the dark ages, giving a concrete signature for large-scale-structure surveys measuring S8.
  • The analytic criteria for slow-roll exit with exponential-like potentials identify which potentials and couplings are worth full numerical investigation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The initial displacement of the scalar field from the minimum of m(φ) is not derived from within the model; if this displacement requires additional tuning or a separate microphysical source, the claim of minimal unification is weakened.
  • The same mass-varying mechanism could be probed more directly with measurements that isolate the clustering amplitude from the expansion history, such as redshift-space distortions or cosmic shear as a function of redshift.
  • The analytic bound on fine-tuning in the sign-flip branch suggests that the slow-roll exit branch is the more likely survivor in full numerical fits, a testable preference.
  • A full numerical study including scalar perturbations and modified dark matter continuity equations would be needed to convert the provisional S8 diagnostic into a definitive prediction; until then, that part of the claim remains provisional.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a class of mass-varying dark matter models in which a single scalar field φ controls the dark matter mass via m(φ)=m0(1+φ^{2n}/M^{2n}). The central claim is that, with one bare potential and one interaction scale M, the same field can (i) source an early-dark-energy-like injection around matter-radiation equality, (ii) produce an apparent phantom crossing at low redshift (the phantom-mirage effect), and (iii) lower the clustering matter density and hence S8. The timing of the early and late effects is claimed to be tied to the background abundances rather than to independent energy scales. The paper develops analytic estimates in Sec. 3 for the early-time peak and in Secs. 4.1–4.2 for two late-time mechanisms (sign-flip and slow-roll exit), and presents numerical illustrations in Figs. 1–6.

Significance. If the central claim held, this would be a useful contribution: it identifies a minimal dark-sector model in which the same coupling scale can address both the H0 and DESI-related tensions, and it attempts to quantify the fine-tuning in explicit mechanisms. The paper is genuinely transparent about its limitations: it flags the initial-displacement problem in Sec. 4.2 and explicitly concedes in Sec. 3 that the S8 diagnostic is not a full perturbation-theory calculation. The numerical examples (Figs. 1, 5) show that the qualitative effects can be realized for M∼1.5M_pl. However, the analytic derivation of the early-time peak contains a serious error: the linearization in Eq. (3.8) drops the zeroth-order coupling force, which invalidates the frozen-field regime and the peak-amplitude estimate (3.12). Because the early-time mechanism is a load-bearing pillar of the claimed unification, the paper requires substantial revision before the analytic framework can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2 / Fig. 5] The linearized equation of motion drops the zeroth-order term in the coupling force. Expanding Eq. (3.6) about φ_i gives δφ'' + (3+H'/H)δφ' = -3M_pl^2 [m,φ(φ_i)/m(φ0)] Ω_M(1-r) - 3M_pl^2 [m,φφ(φ_i)/m(φ0)] Ω_M(1-r) δφ. The first term is absent in Eq. (3.8). For n=1, m,φ(φ_i)/m0 = 2φ_i/M^2, which is nonzero whenever φ_i≠0. During radiation domination Ω_M ∝ a, and this constant source gives a displacement at matter-radiation equality δφ ≈ -(3/2)(1-r)M_pl^2 [m,φ(φ_i)/m(φ0)]. For the Fig. 5 benchmark (M≈1.5M_pl, φ_i≈0.8M), this is ≈ -1.4M_pl, of order φ_i itself. Thus the 'frozen' branch underlying Eqs. (3.9)–(3.12) does not exist for the non-vanishing initial displacements required for a positive peak, and the claimed separation of peak timing and peak height is not established. The numerical bump in Figs. 1 and 5 may survive a corrected treatment, but the analytic derivation in Sec. 3 must
  2. [Sec. 4.2, p. 16]
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.19)–(3.20)]
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.14)]
  2. [Fig. 5 caption]
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.16)]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; one minor self-citation supplies motivation for the initial displacement, but the central derivations are conditional and self-contained.

  1. other [Sec. 4.2, unifying discussion before Sec. 5, following Fig. 4]
    "The late-time crossing is largely insensitive to ϕ_i for the exponential potentials considered here, while the early-time peak depends directly on the initial displacement, since it appears only when m(ϕ_i)>m(ϕ_0). Such a displacement may be difficult to motivate in isolation, but it can arise naturally if ϕ also has interactions with the Standard Model [147]."

    The early-time EDE pillar requires an initial displacement (m(ϕ_i)>m(ϕ_0), Eq. 3.12), and the only offered origin for that displacement is Ref. [147], which shares an author with this paper and is not derived or validated here. This is a self-citation used to patch a gap in the naturalness narrative. It is not a mathematical reduction: the analytic results are conditional on the displacement as an input, and the paper itself flags the difficulty, so the effect on the circularity score is small.

full rationale

The core derivations are self-contained: Eq. (2.3) defines an inferred dark-energy component; the early-time peak amplitude (3.12) is an explicit consequence of this definition together with the slow-roll breakdown condition (3.11), and the late-time phantom crossing follows from Eq. (2.4). No parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction; Figs. 5 and 6 scan fixed parameter choices to show qualitative behavior. The phantom-mirage phenomenon is supported by non-overlapping literature (e.g. Refs. [112,114,115]) in addition to the author-overlapping Refs. [87,110], so the self-citations there are not the load-bearing source. The initial-displacement issue is the only self-citation that touches the central narrative, and the paper explicitly concedes it 'may be difficult to motivate in isolation.' We therefore do not treat the early-time peak as a fitted prediction. A separate internal-consistency concern — Eq. (3.8) linearizes away the zeroth-order coupling force m,ϕ(ϕ_i) — is a correctness issue rather than circularity and does not enter the score here.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central economy: one interaction scale M does double duty (early-peak timing and late crossing), which is the paper's main 'no new clock' result. But the model still carries hand-chosen inputs: the initial displacement phi_i that makes the early peak exist at all (flagged by the authors as hard to motivate), the present-day value phi_0, and, in the sign-flip branch, alpha and m_phi/H_c—which the authors' own scan (2/150 viable) shows to be tightly tuned. Only the exponential-potential branch (lambda-tilde) achieves near-phi_i-independence. No new entities are invented; the effective rho_de (Eq. 2.3) is a reconstruction of what a constant-mass observer would infer, not a new physical component.

free parameters (5)
  • M (interaction scale in m(phi) = m0(1 + phi^{2n}/M^{2n})) = M ~ 1.5 M_Pl for n=1 (Figs. 5-6); scanned over 1 < M/M_Pl < 100 in Fig. 4
    Sets both the early-time peak timing/amplitude (Eqs. 3.11-3.12) and the late-time phantom-crossing strength. For n=1 the equality-timing condition (3.11) fixes M ~ 1.5 M_Pl, which is then the single scale claimed to unify both effects.
  • phi_i (initial field displacement) = phi_i = 0.8 M in Figs. 5-6; phi_i/M in [1e-5, 1e-1] in Fig. 2 scan
    Controls the early-peak amplitude via m(phi_i)/m(phi_0) (Eq. 3.12); a positive peak requires m(phi_i) > m(phi_0). The paper concedes this displacement 'may be difficult to motivate in isolation' (Sec. 4.2); it is a load-bearing initial condition.
  • phi_0 (present-day field value) = Chosen implicitly by the late-time potential minimum; phi_0 << M assumed in several estimates
    Enters R = <phi^{2n}>/phi_0^{2n} (Eq. 3.17); the sign of <rho_de> (Eq. 3.18) and the negative-matter regime depend on whether phi_0 > 0.
  • alpha and m_phi/H_c (sign-flip branch) = alpha in [0.05, 1.5], m_phi/H_c in [1, 100] (log-uniform scan, Fig. 2); only 2/150 samples viable
    Critical density ratio and initial tachyonic mass in the sign-flip mechanism (Eqs. 4.3, 4.8). The paper's own scan shows the viable region is tiny, i.e., these are effectively highly tuned inputs.
  • lambda-tilde (exponential potential slope) and V_0 = lambda-tilde = 1 in Fig. 4; V_0 sets Omega_de,0 ~ 0.7 (standard dark-energy scale)
    In the slow-roll-exit branch, wde,0 = lambda-tilde^2/3 - 1 follows from the attractor, so lambda-tilde controls the final equation of state; V_0 is the usual cosmological-constant-scale input.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Coupled-quintessence fluid equations (Eqs. 2.1-2.2): canonical scalar with DM as a pressureless fluid whose mass m(phi) is field-dependent, on a flat FRW background
    The entire analysis lives in this model class; the paper states it remains 'agnostic about the microscopic nature of dark matter' (Sec. 2).
  • domain assumption Bare potential V(phi) is subdominant near matter-radiation equality (Eq. 3.1)
    Justified by V(phi) being chosen to drive late-time acceleration, but it is an assumption used to isolate the coupling-driven early dynamics.
  • standard math Virial theorem applies to field oscillations about the m(phi) minimum, with oscillation period much shorter than a Hubble time (Eq. 3.15)
    Standard mechanics result; needed for the post-peak <w_de> = nR/((n+1)R-1) result (Eq. 3.16).
  • standard math Exponential-potential attractor results: w_phi = lambda-tilde^2/3 - 1 and slow-roll exit when Omega_phi ~ 1/3 lambda-tilde^2
    Imported from Copeland-Liddle-Wands (1998) and Copeland et al. (2006), cited as Refs. [45,46]; used for the slow-roll-exit branch.
  • domain assumption EFT truncation of V(phi) and m(phi) at written powers; field displacements must stay below M and M-tilde (Eq. 4.16 discussion)
    The fine-tuning assessment and EFT-regime claims rely on this; the paper uses it to bound acceptable displacements.
  • domain assumption Growth diagnostic Eqs. (3.19)-(3.20) captures the S8 direction from the background alone
    Explicitly provisional—the paper states a definitive statement 'requires a full numerical study including scalar perturbations and the modified dark matter continuity and Euler equations' (Sec. 3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unified dark sector approaches to cosmological tensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MARNO4QX

@misc{pith2026260727515,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unified dark sector approaches to cosmological tensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MARNO4QX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27515}
}
abstract

We present an analytical study of minimal mass-varying dark matter models, in which a single scalar field controls the dark matter mass, focusing on their utility in simultaneously addressing multiple cosmological tensions. We show that such minimal models can naturally become relevant at two critical epochs in the history of the Universe; matter-radiation equality and the present day, generating an early dark energy-like energy injection, as motivated by the Hubble tension, and an apparent phantom crossing, as suggested by baryon acoustic oscillation data from the DESI project. Crucially, the characteristic timing of these effects is tied to the cosmological background evolution itself, rather than specific energy scales. In addition, the intermediate evolution reduces the clustering matter density and can therefore lower $S_8$, in the direction preferred by data, while avoiding new long-range interactions. We derive analytic arguments to understand the conditions for these effects to arise in the same model and assess whether they can occur without introducing additional fine-tuning. This provides a simple framework for identifying which potentials and couplings to dark matter can simultaneously affect early- and late-time cosmological tensions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Coupled quintessence from an axion dark sector

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A coupled two-axion dark sector reproduces the apparent phantom-crossing dark energy hinted at by DESI and fits CMB, BAO, and Type Ia supernova data as well as LambdaCDM.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, “Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,” Nature Astron., vol. 3, p. 891, 2019

    2019

  2. [2]

    Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,

    E. Di Valentinoet al., “Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,”Astropart. Phys., vol. 131, p. 102605, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Early recombination as a solution to theH0 tension,

    T. Sekiguchi and T. Takahashi, “Early recombination as a solution to theH0 tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 8, p. 083507, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 38, no. 15, p. 153001, 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,

    N. Schöneberg, G. Franco Abellán, A. Pérez Sánchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin, and J. Lesgourgues, “The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,”Phys. Rept., vol. 984, pp. 1–55, 2022

    2022

  6. [6]

    The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess, “The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., vol. 73, pp. 153–180, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,

    E. Di Valentinoet al., “The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 49, p. 101965, 2025

    2025

  8. [8]

    The Hubble tension: A decade review,

    R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang, “The Hubble tension: A decade review,”Res. Astron. Astrophys., vol. 26, p. 084011, 2026

    2026

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 641, p. A6, 2020, [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2018

  2. [10]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth,

    F. J. Quet al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth,”Astrophys. J., vol. 962, no. 2, p. 112, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,

    M. S. Madhavacherilet al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters,”Astrophys. J., vol. 962, no. 2, p. 113, 2024. – 20 –

    2024

  4. [12]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,

    A. G. Riesset al., “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 934, no. 1, p. L7, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σtension between early- and late-Universe probes,

    K. C. Wonget al., “H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σtension between early- and late-Universe probes,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 498, no. 1, pp. 1420–1439, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,

    W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, T. Hoyt, I. S. Jang, R. Beaton, M. G. Lee, A. Monson, J. Neeley, and J. Rich, “Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,”Astrophys. J., vol. 891, no. 1, p. 57, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    TDCOSMO - IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles,

    S. Birreret al., “TDCOSMO - IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 643, p. A165, 2020

    2020

  8. [16]

    No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time solutions,

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu, and Y. Zhou, “No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time solutions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 2, p. L021301, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    On the Difficulties with Late-Time Solutions for the Hubble Tension,

    P. Bansal and D. Huterer, “On the Difficulties with Late-Time Solutions for the Hubble Tension,” 2 2026

    2026

  10. [18]

    How early is early dark energy?

    V. Pettorino, L. Amendola, and C. Wetterich, “How early is early dark energy?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 87, p. 083009, 2013

    2013

  11. [19]

    Dark energy from the string axiverse,

    M. Kamionkowski, J. Pradler, and D. G. E. Walker, “Dark energy from the string axiverse,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, no. 25, p. 251302, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal, and M. Kamionkowski, “Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, no. 22, p. 221301, 2019

    2019

  13. [21]

    Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension,

    J. Sakstein and M. Trodden, “Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, no. 16, p. 161301, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Axion-Dilaton Destabilization and the Hubble Tension,

    S. Alexander and E. McDonough, “Axion-Dilaton Destabilization and the Hubble Tension,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 797, p. 134830, 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures,

    T. L. Smith, V. Poulin, and M. A. Amin, “Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 6, p. 063523, 2020

    2020

  16. [24]

    Acoustic Dark Energy: Potential Conversion of the Hubble Tension,

    M.-X. Lin, G. Benevento, W. Hu, and M. Raveri, “Acoustic Dark Energy: Potential Conversion of the Hubble Tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 063542, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Early Mass-varying Neutrino Dark Energy: Nugget Formation and Hubble Anomaly,

    A. Gogoi, R. K. Sharma, P. Chanda, and S. Das, “Early Mass-varying Neutrino Dark Energy: Nugget Formation and Hubble Anomaly,”Astrophys. J., vol. 915, no. 2, p. 132, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Chameleon early dark energy and the Hubble tension,

    T. Karwal, M. Raveri, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, “Chameleon early dark energy and the Hubble tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 6, p. 063535, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Hot new early dark energy: Towards a unified dark sector of neutrinos, dark energy and dark matter,

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth, “Hot new early dark energy: Towards a unified dark sector of neutrinos, dark energy and dark matter,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 835, p. 137555, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Scaling solutions as Early Dark Energy resolutions to the Hubble tension,

    E. J. Copeland, A. Moss, S. Sevillano Muñoz, and J. M. M. White, “Scaling solutions as Early Dark Energy resolutions to the Hubble tension,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 078, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,

    A. G. Adameet al., “DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 021, 2025

    2024

  22. [30]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,

    M. Abdul Karimet al., “DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083515, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024,

    J. Zheng, D.-C. Qiang, and Z.-Q. You, “Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024,”JCAP, vol. 08, p. 056, 2025

    2024

  24. [32]

    Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy,

    M. Cortês and A. R. Liddle, “Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 007, 2024. – 21 –

    2024

  25. [33]

    Probing dark energy evolution post-DESI 2024,

    L. Orchard and V. H. Cárdenas, “Probing dark energy evolution post-DESI 2024,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 46, p. 101678, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Assessing observational constraints on dark energy,

    D. Shlivko and P. J. Steinhardt, “Assessing observational constraints on dark energy,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 855, p. 138826, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Consistent theories for the DESI dark energy fit,

    A. Notari, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, “Consistent theories for the DESI dark energy fit,”JCAP, vol. 11, p. 025, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    A preference for dynamical phantom dark energy using one-parameter model with Planck, DESI DR1 BAO and SN data,

    R. Fikri, E. Elkhateeb, E. I. Lashin, and W. El Hanafy, “A preference for dynamical phantom dark energy using one-parameter model with Planck, DESI DR1 BAO and SN data,”Annals Phys., vol. 481, p. 170190, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae,

    W. Giarè, “Dynamical dark energy beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO, and type-Ia supernovae,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 2, p. 023508, 2025

    2025

  30. [38]

    Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,

    K. Lodhaet al., “Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083511, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    Shape of dark energy: Constraining its evolution with a general parametrization,

    D. H. Lee, W. Yang, E. Di Valentino, S. Pan, and C. van de Bruck, “Shape of dark energy: Constraining its evolution with a general parametrization,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 6, p. 063554, 2026

    2026

  32. [40]

    Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: A challenge for theΛCDM paradigm?

    S. Pan, S. Paul, E. N. Saridakis, and W. Yang, “Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: A challenge for theΛCDM paradigm?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 2, p. 023515, 2026

    2026

  33. [41]

    Challenging theΛCDM model: 5σevidence for a dynamical dark energy late-time transition,

    M. Scherer, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and A. De Felice, “Challenging theΛCDM model: 5σevidence for a dynamical dark energy late-time transition,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 4, p. 043513, 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    How theory-informed priors affect DESI evidence for evolving dark energy,

    M. W. Toomey, G. Montefalcone, E. McDonough, and K. Freese, “How theory-informed priors affect DESI evidence for evolving dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 12, p. 123532, 2026

    2026

  35. [43]

    To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state,

    S. Nesseris, Y. Akrami, and G. D. Starkman, “To CPL, or not to CPL? What we have not learned about the dark energy equation of state,” 3 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy and theΩm Tug-of-War,

    D. Shlivko and V. Poulin, “Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy and theΩm Tug-of-War,” 3 2026

    2026

  37. [45]

    Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions,

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, “Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 57, pp. 4686–4690, 1998

    1998

  38. [46]

    Dynamics of dark energy,

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of dark energy,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 15, pp. 1753–1936, 2006

    1936

  39. [47]

    Yoga Dark Energy: natural relaxation and other dark implications of a supersymmetric gravity sector,

    C. P. Burgess, D. Dineen, and F. Quevedo, “Yoga Dark Energy: natural relaxation and other dark implications of a supersymmetric gravity sector,”JCAP, vol. 03, no. 03, p. 064, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    DESI constraints on exponential quintessence,

    O. F. Ramadan, J. Sakstein, and D. Rubin, “DESI constraints on exponential quintessence,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 4, p. L041303, 2024

    2024

  41. [49]

    Cosmological constraints on curved quintessence,

    S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, “Cosmological constraints on curved quintessence,”JCAP, vol. 09, p. 073, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Is phantom barrier crossing inevitable? A cosmographic analysis,

    N. Roy and S. Chakrabarti, “Is phantom barrier crossing inevitable? A cosmographic analysis,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 86, no. 5, p. 586, 2026

    2026

  43. [51]

    Optimal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy,

    D. Shlivko, P. J. Steinhardt, and C. L. Steinhardt, “Optimal parameterizations for observational constraints on thawing dark energy,” 4 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Null impact of the null energy condition in current cosmology,

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, “Null impact of the null energy condition in current cosmology,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 008, 2026

    2026

  45. [53]

    Thawing quintessence and transient cosmic acceleration in light of DESI,

    R. de Souza, G. Rodrigues, and J. Alcaniz, “Thawing quintessence and transient cosmic acceleration in light of DESI,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 083533, 2025. – 22 –

    2025

  46. [54]

    Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast constraints,

    A. J. Shajib and J. A. Frieman, “Scalar-field dark energy models: Current and forecast constraints,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 063508, 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Late-Time Oscillating Quintessence in Light of DESI,

    J.-Q. Jiang, M. A. Amin, and A. Shafieloo, “Late-Time Oscillating Quintessence in Light of DESI,” 6 2026

    2026

  48. [56]

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterwbe less than−1?

    S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameterwbe less than−1?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 68, p. 023509, 2003

    2003

  49. [57]

    The Phantom menaced: Constraints on low-energy effective ghosts,

    J. M. Cline, S. Jeon, and G. D. Moore, “The Phantom menaced: Constraints on low-energy effective ghosts,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 70, p. 043543, 2004

    2004

  50. [58]

    Null energy condition and superluminal propagation,

    S. Dubovsky, T. Gregoire, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, “Null energy condition and superluminal propagation,”JHEP, vol. 03, p. 025, 2006

    2006

  51. [59]

    Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity,

    A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi, and E. Trincherini, “Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity,”JHEP, vol. 05, p. 095, 2010, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 128 (2011)]

    2010

  52. [60]

    Galilean Genesis: An Alternative to inflation,

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, and E. Trincherini, “Galilean Genesis: An Alternative to inflation,” JCAP, vol. 11, p. 021, 2010

    2010

  53. [61]

    Subluminal Galilean Genesis,

    P. Creminelli, K. Hinterbichler, J. Khoury, A. Nicolis, and E. Trincherini, “Subluminal Galilean Genesis,”JHEP, vol. 02, p. 006, 2013

    2013

  54. [62]

    Coupled quintessence,

    L. Amendola, “Coupled quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 62, p. 043511, 2000

    2000

  55. [63]

    Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cosmological chameleon,

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, J. Khoury, and A. Weltman, “Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cosmological chameleon,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 70, p. 123518, 2004

    2004

  56. [64]

    Consequences of dark matter-dark energy interaction on cosmological parameters derived from SNIa data,

    L. Amendola, G. Camargo Campos, and R. Rosenfeld, “Consequences of dark matter-dark energy interaction on cosmological parameters derived from SNIa data,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 75, p. 083506, 2007

    2007

  57. [65]

    Early dark energy cosmologies,

    M. Doran and G. Robbers, “Early dark energy cosmologies,”JCAP, vol. 06, p. 026, 2006

    2006

  58. [66]

    Addressing the Hubble and S8 tensions with a kinetically mixed dark sector,

    S. Alexander, H. Bernardo, and M. W. Toomey, “Addressing the Hubble and S8 tensions with a kinetically mixed dark sector,”JCAP, vol. 03, p. 037, 2023

    2023

  59. [67]

    Dark matter trigger for early dark energy coincidence,

    M.-X. Lin, E. McDonough, J. C. Hill, and W. Hu, “Dark matter trigger for early dark energy coincidence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 10, p. 103523, 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    Exploring the H0 tension and the evidence for dark sector interactions from 2D BAO measurements,

    A. Bernui, E. Di Valentino, W. Giarè, S. Kumar, and R. C. Nunes, “Exploring the H0 tension and the evidence for dark sector interactions from 2D BAO measurements,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 10, p. 103531, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    On the interacting dark energy scenarios−the case for Hubble constant tension,

    S. Pan and W. Yang, “On the interacting dark energy scenarios−the case for Hubble constant tension,” 10 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Coupled dark sector models and cosmological tensions,

    G. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Han, Y. Mu, and L. Xu, “Coupled dark sector models and cosmological tensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 10, p. 103531, 2024

    2024

  63. [71]

    Hubble Tension as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,

    C. Pitrou and J.-P. Uzan, “Hubble Tension as a Window on the Gravitation of the Dark Matter Sector,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, no. 19, p. 191001, 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    A consistent view of interacting dark energy from multiple CMB probes,

    Y. Zhai, W. Giarè, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, and R. C. Nunes, “A consistent view of interacting dark energy from multiple CMB probes,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 032, 2023

    2023

  65. [73]

    A Minimal Axio-dilaton Dark Sector,

    A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, “A Minimal Axio-dilaton Dark Sector,” 10 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Thermocoupled early dark energy,

    M. Kamionkowski and A. Mathur, “Thermocoupled early dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 6, p. 063551, 2025

    2025

  67. [75]

    CMB implications of multi-field axio-dilaton cosmology,

    A. Smith, M. Mylova, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, “CMB implications of multi-field axio-dilaton cosmology,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 058, 2024. – 23 –

    2024

  68. [76]

    Screened axio-dilaton cosmology: novel forms of early dark energy,

    A. Smith, P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and A.-C. Davis, “Screened axio-dilaton cosmology: novel forms of early dark energy,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 9, p. 1062, 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    The Serendipitous Axiodilaton: A Self-Consistent Recombination-Era Solution to the Hubble Tension,

    A. Smith, M. Mylova, C. van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, and E. Di Valentino, “The Serendipitous Axiodilaton: A Self-Consistent Recombination-Era Solution to the Hubble Tension,” 12 2025

    2025

  70. [78]

    Interacting quintessence. The Coincidence problem and cosmic acceleration,

    G. Huey and B. D. Wandelt, “Interacting quintessence. The Coincidence problem and cosmic acceleration,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 023519, 2006

    2006

  71. [79]

    Can interacting dark energy solve theH0 tension?

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and O. Mena, “Can interacting dark energy solve theH0 tension?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 4, p. 043503, 2017

    2017

  72. [80]

    Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions,

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, “Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 101, no. 6, p. 063502, 2020

    2020

  73. [81]

    Scalar field dark matter and dark energy: a hybrid model for the dark sector,

    C. van de Bruck, G. Poulot, and E. M. Teixeira, “Scalar field dark matter and dark energy: a hybrid model for the dark sector,”JCAP, vol. 07, p. 019, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Scalar field dark matter with time-varying equation of state,

    G. Poulot, E. M. Teixeira, C. van de Bruck, and N. J. Nunes, “Scalar field dark matter with time-varying equation of state,”JCAP, vol. 11, p. 005, 2025

    2025

  75. [83]

    Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,

    W. Giarè, M. A. Sabogal, R. C. Nunes, and E. Di Valentino, “Interacting Dark Energy after DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 133, no. 25, p. 251003, 2024

    2024

  76. [84]

    Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,

    G. Ye, M. Martinelli, B. Hu, and A. Silvestri, “Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 134, no. 18, p. 181002, 2025

    2024

  77. [85]

    Scant evidence for thawing quintessence,

    W. J. Wolf, C. García-García, D. J. Bartlett, and P. G. Ferreira, “Scant evidence for thawing quintessence,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 8, p. 083528, 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Alleviating cosmological tensions with a hybrid dark sector,

    E. M. Teixeira, G. Poulot, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, and V. Poulin, “Alleviating cosmological tensions with a hybrid dark sector,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 2, p. 023514, 2026

    2026

  79. [87]

    Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,

    J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, “Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S8 from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 135, no. 18, p. 181001, 2025

    2025

  80. [88]

    Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations,

    W. J. Wolf, C. García-García, and P. G. Ferreira, “Robustness of dark energy phenomenology across different parameterizations,”JCAP, vol. 05, p. 034, 2025

    2025

  81. [89]

    Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for early dark energy and the Hubble tension,

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calderón, and T. Simon, “Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for early dark energy and the Hubble tension,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 6, p. 063519, 2026

    2026

  82. [90]

    Toward a simultaneous resolution of the H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy and an interacting dark sector model,

    M. Yashiki, “Toward a simultaneous resolution of the H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy and an interacting dark sector model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 6, p. 063517, 2025

    2025

  83. [91]

    Exponential quintessence with momentum coupling to dark matter,

    A. Pourtsidou, “Exponential quintessence with momentum coupling to dark matter,”JCAP, vol. 02, p. 014, 2026

    2026

  84. [92]

    Uplifting, Depressing, and Tilting Dark Energy,

    E. V. Linder, “Uplifting, Depressing, and Tilting Dark Energy,” 6 2025

    2025

  85. [93]

    A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model,

    Y. Zhai, M. de Cesare, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model,”JCAP, vol. 11, p. 010, 2025

    2025

  86. [94]

    A general model for dark energy crossing the phantom divide,

    Z. Yao, G. Ye, and A. Silvestri, “A general model for dark energy crossing the phantom divide,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 078, 2025

    2025

  87. [95]

    Dynamical Dark Energy Meets Varying Electron Mass: Implications for Phantom Crossing and the Hubble Constant,

    A. Smith, E. Özülker, E. Di Valentino, and C. van de Bruck, “Dynamical Dark Energy Meets Varying Electron Mass: Implications for Phantom Crossing and the Hubble Constant,” 10 2025. – 24 –

    2025

  88. [96]

    Non-Minimally Coupled Quintessence in Light of DESI,

    S. Sánchez López, A. Karam, and D. K. Hazra, “Non-Minimally Coupled Quintessence in Light of DESI,” 10 2025

    2025

  89. [97]

    Phantom mirage from axion dark energy,

    R. Liu, Y. Zhu, W. Hu, and V. Miranda, “Phantom mirage from axion dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 113, no. 8, p. 083506, 2026

    2026

  90. [98]

    Kinetic Mixing and the Phantom Illusion: Axion-Dilaton Quintessence in Light of DESI DR2,

    M. W. Toomey, E. Hughes, M. M. Ivanov, and J. M. Sullivan, “Kinetic Mixing and the Phantom Illusion: Axion-Dilaton Quintessence in Light of DESI DR2,” 11 2025

    2025

  91. [99]

    Late-time background constraints on linear and non-linear interacting dark energy after DESI DR2,

    D. Figueruelo, M. van der Westhuizen, A. Abebe, and E. Di Valentino, “Late-time background constraints on linear and non-linear interacting dark energy after DESI DR2,” Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 52, p. 102238, 2026

    2026

  92. [100]

    Interacting dark sector from intrinsic entropy couplings,

    E. Jensko, E. M. Teixeira, and V. Poulin, “Interacting dark sector from intrinsic entropy couplings,” 3 2026

    2026

  93. [101]

    Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction,

    J.-Q. Wang, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, Y.-H. Li, S.-J. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Non-minimally coupled quintessence with sign-switching interaction,” 4 2026

    2026

  94. [102]

    Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide,

    S. Antusch, S. F. King, and X. Wang, “Coupled Dark Energy and Dark Matter for DESI: An Effective Guide to the Phantom Divide,” 4 2026

    2026

  95. [103]

    Charging Across the Phantom Divide with Modified Gravity,

    R. Calderon and E. V. Linder, “Charging Across the Phantom Divide with Modified Gravity,” 5 2026

    2026

  96. [104]

    Interactions in the dark sector: intrinsic entropy couplings,

    E. M. Teixeira, “Interactions in the dark sector: intrinsic entropy couplings,” in60th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology: Moriond Cosmology 2026, 6 2026

    2026

  97. [105]

    Constraints on Horndeski Gravity with Phantom Crossing,

    K. Naidoo, J. Hallam, T. Baker, and S. Sirera, “Constraints on Horndeski Gravity with Phantom Crossing,” 6 2026

    2026

  98. [106]

    Natural Phantom Dark Energy from aZN–Axion,

    C. Delaunay and A. Greljo, “Natural Phantom Dark Energy from aZN–Axion,” 7 2026

    2026

  99. [107]

    The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy,

    C. García-García, P. G. Ferreira, and W. J. Wolf, “The Status of Single Scalar Field Dark Energy,” 7 2026

    2026

  100. [108]

    Evolving Dark Energy Is Vacuum Energy After All,

    D. H. Lee, C. van de Bruck, E. Di Valentino, L. Van Waerbeke, and A. Zhitnitsky, “Evolving Dark Energy Is Vacuum Energy After All,” 6 2026

    2026

  101. [109]

    Robust Preference for Dark Sector Interactions,

    T.-N. Li, W. Giarè, G.-H. Du, Y.-H. Li, E. Di Valentino, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Robust Preference for Dark Sector Interactions,” 1 2026

    2026

  102. [110]

    Cosmological Evidence for Dark Axion-Dark Baryon Interactions from Apparent Phantom Crossing,

    J. Khoury, M.-X. Lin, and M. Trodden, “Cosmological Evidence for Dark Axion-Dark Baryon Interactions from Apparent Phantom Crossing,” 7 2026

    2026

  103. [111]

    Can we be tricked into thinking that w is less than -1?

    S. M. Carroll, A. De Felice, and M. Trodden, “Can we be tricked into thinking that w is less than -1?”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 71, p. 023525, 2005

    2005

  104. [112]

    Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,

    S. Das, P. S. Corasaniti, and J. Khoury, “Super-acceleration as signature of dark sector interaction,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 083509, 2006

    2006

  105. [113]

    Cosmology of mass-varying neutrinos driven by quintessence: theory and observations,

    A. W. Brookfield, C. van de Bruck, D. F. Mota, and D. Tocchini-Valentini, “Cosmology of mass-varying neutrinos driven by quintessence: theory and observations,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 73, p. 083515, 2006, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 76, 049901 (2007)]

    2006

  106. [114]

    H0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter,

    P. Agrawal, G. Obied, and C. Vafa, “H0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 4, p. 043523, 2021

    2021

  107. [115]

    Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,

    A. Bedroya, G. Obied, C. Vafa, and D. H. Wu, “Evolving Dark Sector and the Dark Dimension Scenario,” 7 2025

    2025

  108. [116]

    Chain early dark energy: A Proposal for solving the Hubble tension and explaining today’s dark energy,

    K. Freese and M. W. Winkler, “Chain early dark energy: A Proposal for solving the Hubble tension and explaining today’s dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 8, p. 083533, 2021

    2021

  109. [117]

    Quintessential cosmological tensions,

    A. Adil, A. Albrecht, and L. Knox, “Quintessential cosmological tensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 6, p. 063521, 2023. – 25 –

    2023

  110. [118]

    Attractive proposal for resolving the Hubble tension: Dynamical attractors that unify early and late dark energy,

    O. F. Ramadan, T. Karwal, and J. Sakstein, “Attractive proposal for resolving the Hubble tension: Dynamical attractors that unify early and late dark energy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 6, p. 063525, 2024

    2024

  111. [119]

    Quintessential early dark energy,

    S. Sohail, S. Alam, S. Akthar, and M. W. Hossain, “Quintessential early dark energy,”Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 48, p. 101948, 2025

    2025

  112. [120]

    Dark energy in light of DESI DR1 and Hubble tension,

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao, “Dark energy in light of DESI DR1 and Hubble tension,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 873, p. 140180, 2026

    2026

  113. [121]

    Mass-Varying Neutrinos from an Inverse Symmetron,

    M. Baidya, Ø. Christiansen, V. da Fonseca, E. V. Linder, and D. F. Mota, “Mass-Varying Neutrinos from an Inverse Symmetron,” 6 2026

    2026

  114. [122]

    Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions,

    W. Giarè and J. Sakstein, “Unifying Early and Late Dark Energy: Dynamical Requirements and Obstructions,” 5 2026

    2026

  115. [123]

    Scalar - tensor theories of gravity with phi dependent masses,

    J. A. Casas, J. Garcia-Bellido, and M. Quiros, “Scalar - tensor theories of gravity with phi dependent masses,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 9, pp. 1371–1384, 1992

    1992

  116. [124]

    Dark matter with variable masses,

    J. Garcia-Bellido, “Dark matter with variable masses,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 2, pp. 85–95, 1993

    1993

  117. [125]

    Dark matter with time dependent mass,

    G. W. Anderson and S. M. Carroll, “Dark matter with time dependent mass,” in1st International Conference on Particle Physics and the Early Universe, 9 1997, pp. 227–229

    1997

  118. [126]

    Stationary dark energy: The Present universe as a global attractor,

    L. Amendola and D. Tocchini-Valentini, “Stationary dark energy: The Present universe as a global attractor,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 64, p. 043509, 2001

    2001

  119. [127]

    Interacting dark matter and dark energy,

    G. R. Farrar and P. J. E. Peebles, “Interacting dark matter and dark energy,”Astrophys. J., vol. 604, pp. 1–11, 2004

    2004

  120. [128]

    Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,

    R. Fardon, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, “Dark energy from mass varying neutrinos,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 005, 2004

    2004

  121. [129]

    Constraining Interactions in Cosmology’s Dark Sector,

    R. Bean, E. E. Flanagan, I. Laszlo, and M. Trodden, “Constraining Interactions in Cosmology’s Dark Sector,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, p. 123514, 2008

    2008

  122. [130]

    Nonlinear Structure Formation with the Environmentally Dependent Dilaton,

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, B. Li, and D. J. Shaw, “Nonlinear Structure Formation with the Environmentally Dependent Dilaton,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 83, p. 104026, 2011

    2011

  123. [131]

    Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures,

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, and D. Pavon, “Dark Matter and Dark Energy Interactions: Theoretical Challenges, Cosmological Implications and Observational Signatures,”Rept. Prog. Phys., vol. 79, no. 9, p. 096901, 2016

    2016

  124. [132]

    Dark Energy, the Swampland and the Equivalence Principle,

    C. van de Bruck and C. C. Thomas, “Dark Energy, the Swampland and the Equivalence Principle,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, no. 2, p. 023515, 2019

    2019

  125. [133]

    Coupled Early Dark Energy,

    M. Trodden, “Coupled Early Dark Energy,”Springer Proc. Phys., vol. 392, pp. 223–236, 2024

    2024

  126. [134]

    Mass-varying dark matter from a phase transition,

    S. Mandal and N. Sehgal, “Mass-varying dark matter from a phase transition,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 12, p. 123003, 2023

    2023

  127. [135]

    Mass-varying dark matter and its cosmological signature,

    A. Das, S. Das, and S. K. Sethi, “Mass-varying dark matter and its cosmological signature,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 8, p. 083501, 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    A particle’s perspective on screening mechanisms,

    S. Sevillano Muñoz, “A particle’s perspective on screening mechanisms,”JCAP, vol. 12, p. 052, 2024

    2024

  129. [137]

    Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik, and P. Wolf, “Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, no. 6, p. 064051, 2018

    2018

  130. [138]

    New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm,

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer, and B. R. Heckel, “New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, no. 10, p. 101101, 2020. – 26 –

    2020

  131. [139]

    Tidal Tails Test the Equivalence Principle in the Dark Sector,

    M. Kesden and M. Kamionkowski, “Tidal Tails Test the Equivalence Principle in the Dark Sector,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 083007, 2006

    2006

  132. [140]

    Unveiling dark fifth forces with linear cosmology,

    M. Archidiacono, E. Castorina, D. Redigolo, and E. Salvioni, “Unveiling dark fifth forces with linear cosmology,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 074, 2022

    2022

  133. [141]

    Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe,

    M. S. Turner, “Coherent Scalar Field Oscillations in an Expanding Universe,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 28, p. 1243, 1983

    1983

  134. [142]

    KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,

    C. Heymanset al., “KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 646, p. A140, 2021

    2021

  135. [143]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing,

    T. M. C. Abbottet al., “Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 105, no. 2, p. 023520, 2022

    2022

  136. [144]

    Constraining the Properties of Dark Matter with Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

    D. B. Thomas, M. Kopp, and C. Skordis, “Constraining the Properties of Dark Matter with Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background,”Astrophys. J., vol. 830, no. 2, p. 155, 2016

    2016

  137. [145]

    The Limits of quintessence,

    R. R. Caldwell and E. V. Linder, “The Limits of quintessence,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, p. 141301, 2005

    2005

  138. [146]

    Exact Analysis of Scaling and Dominant Attractors Beyond the Exponential Potential,

    W. Fang, Y. Li, K. Zhang, and H.-Q. Lu, “Exact Analysis of Scaling and Dominant Attractors Beyond the Exponential Potential,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 26, p. 155005, 2009

    2009

  139. [147]

    Misalignment from kicks: the impact of particle interactions on ultra-light dark matter,

    C. Burrage and S. Sevillano Muñoz, “Misalignment from kicks: the impact of particle interactions on ultra-light dark matter,” 3 2026. – 27 –

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.