Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 108 references

Doubly-bottom molecular pentaquarks would carry distinct magnetic moments: +2.40, -2.84, and +5.17 nuclear magnetons for the three predicted lowest configurations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 03:57 UTC pith:EUOGZG5P

load-bearing objection New LCSR predictions for doubly-bottom molecular pentaquarks, but the BΣ_b sum rule's missing e_b terms make the headline light-quark-dominance claim unproven. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27653 v1 pith:EUOGZG5P submitted 2026-07-30 hep-ph hep-exhep-lathep-th

Magnetic dipole moments as probes of doubly-bottom molecular pentaquarks

Ula\c{s} \"{O}zdem This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-exhep-lathep-th
keywords doubly-bottom pentaquarksmolecular statesmagnetic dipole momentslight-cone sum rulesphoton distribution amplitudesexotic hadronsspin-flavor structureQCD sum rules
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that the magnetic dipole moments of predicted doubly-bottom pentaquark states are sharply sensitive to the internal spin-flavor arrangement of the quarks, and therefore can serve as a practical experimental probe of the states' internal structure. Treating the states as hadronic molecules built from an open-bottom meson and a singly-bottom baryon—BΣ_b, BΣ_b*, and B*Σ_b—the author computes their magnetic dipole moments using QCD light-cone sum rules with photon distribution amplitudes. The headline predictions are μ(BΣ_b)=2.40 μ_N, μ(BΣ_b*)=-2.84 μ_N, and μ(B*Σ_b)=5.17 μ_N, with the light-quark sector dominating the first, the heavy bottom quark dominating the second, and both sectors contributing constructively in the third. A sympathetic reader would care because these differ in sign and magnitude from earlier compact-pentaquark results, so measuring the moments could help decide whether the candidates are molecules or compact states.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the magnetic dipole moment of a doubly-bottom pentaquark is a direct fingerprint of the spin-flavor arrangement of its constituents. For the molecular BΣ_b (J^P=1/2^-) state, the moment is positive and dominated by the light-quark sector; for BΣ_b* (J^P=3/2^-) it is negative and largely carried by the heavy bottom quark; for B*Σ_b (J^P=3/2^-) light and heavy quarks add constructively to produce a large positive moment. The paper also reports electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments for the two spin-3/2 configurations, and notes that the sign of any single moment cannot by itself distinguish molecular from compact structure, because the omitted

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the QCD light-cone sum rule (LCSR) correlation function in a weak external electromagnetic field, built from interpolating currents for the three molecular configurations. The currents are linear combinations of B^((∗)) and Σ_b^((∗)) fields; the masses and residues enter as two-point inputs adopted from an earlier sum-rule analysis. The QCD side is expanded in free and full quark propagators together with photon distribution amplitudes, which encode the nonperturbative coupling of the photon. The magnetic dipole form factor is isolated by projecting the hadronic correlation function onto specific Lorentz structures—p/ε/q/ for the spin-1/2 state, and g_{μν}p/ε/q/ plus

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation assumes the physical doubly-bottom pentaquarks are dominated by the S-wave B^((∗))Σ_b^((∗)) molecular components written into the interpolating currents; if the real states contain large compact or other Fock components, the predicted moments do not describe them.

What would settle it

A single high-precision measurement, or an independent lattice QCD calculation, of any one of these magnetic moments that disagrees with the quoted values beyond the quoted uncertainties—for instance, finding μ(BΣ_b) negative or near zero, or μ(B*Σ_b) not far above 2 μ_N—would falsify the claim that these moments are the molecular signals.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the molecular assignments are correct, the three states should be separable by their magnetic moments alone: +2.40, -2.84, and +5.17 nuclear magnetons.
  • The opposite signs of the two spin-3/2 configurations mean that a measured sign pattern would directly reflect the underlying spin-flavor alignment.
  • Radiative decay rates and photo-production cross sections inherit these moments, so photon-emission measurements can serve as indirect tests before direct moment measurements become available.
  • Combining the moment pattern with masses and widths gives a sharper molecular-versus-compact discriminator than mass alone.
  • The predicted quadrupole deformation—positive for BΣ_b* and negative for B*Σ_b—adds a further observable that future experiments could check.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could independently test the molecular assumption by computing the same moments on the lattice with the same masses and residues; agreement with the three predicted values would strengthen the molecular picture, while disagreement would indicate the interpolating currents do not dominate the physical states.
  • The omitted spin-1/2 partner of B*Σ_b and the full B*Σ_b* multiplet are the natural next predictions: if their moments follow the same light-versus-heavy pattern, the molecular interpretation gains a systematic signature.
  • A simple constituent-quark model could be fitted to these three predictions to extract effective quark magnetic moments; deviations from additivity would signal dynamics beyond a naive molecular picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes magnetic dipole moments (MDMs) of three doubly-bottom molecular pentaquark configurations — BΣ_b, BΣ_b*, and B*Σ_b — using QCD light-cone sum rules with photon distribution amplitudes. It reports μ(BΣ_b)=2.40^{+0.56}_{-0.47} μ_N, μ(BΣ_b*)=−2.84^{+0.78}_{-0.59} μ_N, and μ(B*Σ_b)=5.17^{+1.08}_{-0.94} μ_N for the J^P=1/2^- and 3/2^- states, together with electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments for the two spin-3/2 configurations. The paper interprets the sign and magnitude pattern as a sensitive probe of the internal spin-flavor structure and as a potential discriminator between molecular and compact pentaquark interpretations. The manuscript provides explicit sum rules in Appendix A, Borel windows, pole-dominance and OPE-convergence checks, and a detailed spin-3/2 hadronic reduction in Appendix C.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the paper provides specific, falsifiable LCSR predictions that could help distinguish molecular from compact doubly-bottom pentaquark assignments when combined with masses and widths. The analysis has strengths: the sum rules are not fitted to the target observables; masses, residues, condensates, and photon-DA parameters are external inputs; the Borel windows and pole-dominance/OPE-convergence criteria are stated; and the paper candidly explains why some spin partners are omitted. The central concern is the charge structure of the BΣ_b sum rule, which lacks any e_b term and therefore undermines the claim that the BΣ_b MDM is light-quark dominated until the issue is resolved.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (A1)] The sum rule R_1 for the BΣ_b channel contains no term proportional to the bottom-quark charge e_b; every term is proportional to (e_d+9e_u). This is inconsistent with the other two channels: Eq. (A3) contains 19 e_b I[0,5] and Eq. (A6) contains (95e_b-...)I[0,5]. Since BΣ_b contains two bottom quarks (one in the B meson and one in Σ_b), the photon should be able to couple to either. Without an explicit cancellation or symmetry argument, the absence of e_b terms suggests an omitted class of photon-emission diagrams in the OPE. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim that the BΣ_b MDM is light-quark dominated and for the comparison with compact pentaquark predictions. The author should either exhibit the e_b cancellation explicitly or include the missing diagrams before the results can be accepted.
  2. [Section II, Eqs. (43)-(51)] The QCD-side derivation is presented only schematically; the text states 'we omit a more detailed exposition here' and refers the reader to Ref. [62]. Because the charge structure of Eq. (A1) is precisely what needs verification, the omission is not merely cosmetic. Please provide the Wick-contraction and OPE reduction for at least the BΣ_b channel, or state explicitly which diagrams contribute to each quark-charge sector, so that the absence of e_b terms can be checked by the reader.
  3. [Section III, Table III] The decomposition into μ_u, μ_d, and μ_b contributions is not defined. The sum rules R_i depend on quark charges in non-trivial combinations such as (e_d+9e_u) and (95e_b-...), so it is not clear how the individual quark contributions in Table III are extracted. The conclusions about 'destructive interference' and 'constructive spin alignment' rely on this decomposition. Please state the precise prescription (e.g., setting all other charges to zero) and confirm that the decomposition is well-defined and scheme-independent.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, Eqs. (6)-(13)] The notation for the quark fields in the molecular currents (e.g., \bar u_d, b_d) is ambiguous; standard color/flavor index conventions would improve readability.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A9)-(A10)] The Borel-transformation formulas appear typeset ambiguously; the fractions and exponents should be restored so the formulas can be read unambiguously.
  3. [Section III, Table II and Fig. 2] Figure 2 shows a visible s0 dependence for all channels. Please clarify whether the quoted asymmetric uncertainties include the full variation over the stated s0 intervals, or only the central-value spread.
  4. [Section III, higher multipoles] The electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole moments are quoted in the text without explicit sum rules, Borel windows, or PC/CVG checks; the reader is referred to Refs. [66,77]. These values are used in the conclusions, so either provide the corresponding expressions or clearly label them as estimates from the cited formalism.
  5. [Section III, comparison with Ref. [37]] The comparison with compact pentaquark predictions would be clearer if the exact quantum numbers, isospin, and current definitions of the compact states in Ref. [37] were specified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: MDMs are LCSR outputs, not fits; self-citations are auxiliary, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central Table II moments are computed, not fitted. Eq. (52) evaluates μP from the OPE functions R_i(M²,s0) in Appendix A using standard inputs (masses, residues, condensates, photon DAs) from Table I; the target MDM values never enter as inputs, and no parameter is adjusted to reproduce an MDM. The molecular interpolating currents and mass/residue inputs are taken from the independent Ref. [36], so the core prediction is not a self-citation chain. The author's own works are cited only for the standard LCSR technique ([62]), for the higher-multipole formalism ([66,77]), and for a compact-pentaquark comparison ([37]); none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as a substitute for the central derivation, and the MDM results stand on the explicit sum rules (A1)-(A7). The omission of intermediate QCD-side algebra (delegated to [62]) and the delegation of quadrupole/octupole formalism to [66,77] are transparency/verifiability issues, not circular reductions. The skeptic's concern about the absence of e_b terms in Eq. (A1) concerns possible omitted diagrams/physics in the OPE, i.e., a correctness or consistency risk, not an equivalence between input and output. Hence no circular step is identifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard QCD sum-rule technique plus external spectroscopic inputs from Ref. [36] and photon-DA parametrizations from Ref. [80]. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The main costs are the hand-chosen s0 and M^2 windows, the external DA/condensate parameters, and unverified multi-hundred-term Dirac algebra.

free parameters (4)
  • Continuum threshold s0 = 134-140 GeV^2 (BΣ_b, BΣ_b*); 135-141 GeV^2 (B*Σ_b)
    Chosen in Sec. III by analogy with tetraquark 1S-2S splittings; not determined within the paper, and variations are a 30% uncertainty source.
  • Borel parameter window M^2 = 5.0-7.0 GeV^2 and 5.5-8.0 GeV^2
    Selected by PC>35% and CVG<5%; a standard but hand-picked working range.
  • Photon DA shape parameters = φ2=0, wV=3.8±1.8, wA=−2.1±1.0, κ=0.2, κ+=0, ζ1=0.4, ζ2=0.3
    Values from Ref. [80]; not fitted here, but they set the nonperturbative photon matrix elements that drive the R_i functions.
  • Magnetic susceptibility χ = 2.85±0.5 GeV^-2
    External input from Ref. [83]; determines the strength of a leading photon-DA term.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality: after Borel transformation, continuum/excited contributions can be represented by the QCD side above the threshold s0.
    Used to derive Eq. (52) and in the PC/CVG criteria of Sec. III; this is a phenomenological ansatz of QCD sum rules.
  • domain assumption Photon distribution amplitudes and their parameters from Ref. [80] correctly encode long-distance photon emission matrix elements.
    All R_i functions are built from these DAs (Appendix B); errors in normalization or shape propagate directly into the moments.
  • domain assumption Interpolating currents in Eqs. (3)-(5) have dominant overlap with the molecular BΣ_b, BΣ_b*, B*Σ_b states, and the masses/residues from Ref. [36] are accurate.
    These inputs enter Eq. (52); if the states are not predominantly molecular, the predictions do not apply.
  • domain assumption Spin-1/2 contamination in the spin-3/2 correlation function is eliminated by the gamma-ordering prescription of Refs. [75,76].
    This removal is central to the F1/F2 extraction in Eq. (38) and Appendix C; no independent check is provided.
  • domain assumption On-shell/real-photon kinematic constraint p·q=0 (Eq. C11) is valid at the hadronic level.
    Used in stage (iii) of Appendix C; equivalent to assuming both hadrons are on-shell with q^2=0.
  • standard math Standard light and heavy quark propagator expansions (Eqs. 46-49) and Dirac algebra are correct.
    Used throughout the OPE; no formal verification or symbolic notebook is provided.
  • domain assumption The electric quadrupole and magnetic octupole sum rules follow from the F3/F4 projections of Refs. [66,77].
    Used for the reported Q and O values, which are not derived in this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 63528 in / 18179 out tokens · 173141 ms · 2026-08-01T03:57:07.983693+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the magnetic dipole moments of doubly-bottom pentaquark states with spin-parities $J^P=\tfrac{1}{2}^-$ and $\tfrac{3}{2}^-$, interpreted as hadronic molecules in the $B\Sigma_b$, $B\Sigma_b^{*}$, and $B^{*}\Sigma_b$ configurations. The analysis is performed within the framework of QCD light-cone sum rules employing photon distribution amplitudes. Our results demonstrate a strong sensitivity of the magnetic dipole moments to the internal spin structure and quark composition of the states. In particular, the light-quark sector provides the dominant contribution in the $B\Sigma_b$ configuration, while the magnetic moment of $B\Sigma_b^{*}$ is largely governed by the heavy bottom quark. For the $B^{*}\Sigma_b$ molecular state, both light and heavy sectors contribute constructively, leading to a significantly enhanced magnetic dipole moment. These findings indicate that magnetic dipole moments constitute a sensitive probe of the internal structure of molecular-type doubly-bottom pentaquarks and provide testable predictions for future experimental studies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27653 by Ula\c{s} \"{O}zdem.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. PC analysis of the MDM for doubly bottom pentaquarks as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The MDMs of the doubly-bottom pentaquarks versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The obtained sum rule for the MDM of theBΣ b state R1(M2,s 0) = 1 226×3 2×5 3×7 2π7 [ 3(ed + 9eu) ( 149I[0,5] + 427I[1,4] )] − mb⟨g2 sG2⟩⟨¯qq⟩f3γ 220×3 3π3 (ed + 9eu)I5[ψa]I[0,0] − ⟨¯qq⟩2 218×3 2×5 2π3 [ (ed + 9eu) ( 15I[0,2]hγ[u0] + 2χI[0,3]φγ[u0] )] + ⟨g2 sG2⟩f3γ 227×3 5×5π 5 (ed + 9eu) [ 63I1[V] + 80(−9I5[ψa] + 4ψa[u0]) ] I[0,2] + mb⟨¯qq⟩f3γ 219×3 4×5π...

  2. [2]

    The obtained sum rule for the MDM of theBΣ ∗ b state R2(M2,s 0) =F BΣ∗ b 1 (M2,s 0)− 1 mBΣ∗ b FBΣ∗ b 2 (M2,s 0),(A2) with FBΣ∗ b 1 (M2,s 0) = 19eb 228×3×5 2×7 2π7I[0,5] − mb⟨g2 sG2⟩⟨¯qq⟩f3γ 221×3 6×5π 3 (ed + 9eu)ψa[u0]I[0,0] + ⟨¯qq⟩2 221×3 2π3 (ed + 9eu)I3[S]I[0,2] + ⟨g2 sG2⟩f3γ 228×3 4×5π 5 (ed + 9eu)(26I1[V] +ψ a[u0])I[0,2] + mb⟨¯qq⟩f3γ 220×3 2×5π 3 (e...

  3. [3]

    The obtained sum rule for the MDM of theB ∗Σb state R3(M2,s 0) =F B∗Σb 1 (M2,s 0)− 1 mB∗Σb FB∗Σb 2 (M2,s 0),(A5) with FB∗Σb 1 (M2,s 0) = 1 227×3×5 2×7 2π7 (95eb−78(ed + 4eu))I[0,5] + mb⟨g2 sG2⟩⟨¯qq⟩ 226×3 6×5π 5 [ −248(ed + 4eu)A[0]I[0,1] + 3348(ed + 4eu)I4[S]I[0,1]−4428e dI4[ ˜S]I[0,1] + 263χedI[0,2]φγ[u0] + 1052χeuI[0,2]φγ[u0] + 704(ed + 9eu)f3γπ2I[0,0]...

  4. [4]

    (23) contains the Rarita-Schwinger projectorsP µα(p)and Pβν(p+q)on either side of the photon-vertex insertion

    Stage (i): unreduced form after polarization sums and on-shell substitution The hadronic correlation functionΠ Had µν (p,q)of Eq. (23) contains the Rarita-Schwinger projectorsP µα(p)and Pβν(p+q)on either side of the photon-vertex insertion. Substituting the explicit form of these projectors [Eq. (27)], expanding the products, and applying the on-shell con...

  5. [5]

    Lorentz structures proportional toF 1(q2) F1(q2)∝ { 8mP∗ bb 3 ενpµ + 4(ε·p)p µpν 3mP∗ bb − 4(ε·q)p µpν 3mP∗ bb + 4(ε·p)p µqν 3mP∗ bb − 4(ε·q)p µqν 3mP∗ bb − 2pµpνq2ε / 3m2 P∗ bb − 2pµq2qνε / 3m2 P∗ bb − 4 3ενpµp /+4(ε·p)p µpνp / 3m2 P∗ bb − 4(ε·q)p µpνp / 3m2 P∗ bb − 8(ε·p) (p·q)p µpνp / 3m4 P∗ bb + 4(ε·p)p νqµp / m2 P∗ bb − 4(ε·q)p µqνp / 3m2 P∗ bb − 8(ε...

  6. [6]

    Lorentz structures proportional toF 2(q2) F2∝ { − 2ενpµq2 3m P∗ bb − 5pµpνq2ε / 3m 2 P∗ bb + 2(p·q)p µpνq2ε / 3m 4 P∗ bb − pνq2qµε / m2 P∗ bb − 2pµq2qνε / 3m 2 P∗ bb + 2(p·q)p µq2qνε / 3m 4 P∗ bb − q2qµqνε / m2 P∗ bb + 3q 2gµνε / 2 − 4(p·q)ε νpµp / 3m 2 P∗ bb + 2(ε·q)p µpνp / m2 P∗ bb − 2ενpµq2p / 3m 2 P∗ bb + 4(ε·p)p µqνp / 3m 2 P∗ bb + 2(ε·q)p µqνp / m2...

  7. [7]

    Lorentz structures proportional toF 3(q2) F3∝ { − (ε·q)p µpνq2 6m 3 P∗ bb − (ε·q)p µq2qν 6m 3 P∗ bb + pµpνq2 6m 2 P∗ bb ε /−pµpν (q2)2 6m 4 P∗ bb ε /−pνq2qµ 4m 2 P∗ bb ε / + 5pµq2qν 12m 2 P∗ bb ε /−pµ (q2)2qν 6m 4 P∗ bb ε /−q2qµqν 4m 2 P∗ bb ε /−2(ε·p)(p·q) 2pµpν 3m 6 P∗ bb p /−(ε·p)p µpνq2 6m 4 P∗ bb p / − (ε·q)p µpνq2 6m 4 P∗ bb p /−2(ε·p)(p·q)p µpνq2 3...

  8. [8]

    Lorentz structures proportional toF 4(q2) F4(q2)∝ { − (p·q)p µpνq2 6m 4 P∗ bb ε /+(p·q) 2pµpνq2 6m 6 P∗ bb ε /−pµpν (q2)2 24m 4 P∗ bb ε /+(p·q)p µpν (q2)2 6m 6 P∗ bb ε / + pνq2qµ 4m 2 P∗ bb ε /−(p·q)p νq2qµ 4m 4 P∗ bb ε /−pν (q2)2qµ 4m 4 P∗ bb ε /−5(p·q)p µq2qν 12m 4 P∗ bb ε /+(p·q) 2pµq2qν 6m 6 P∗ bb ε / − pµ (q2)2qν 24m 4 P∗ bb ε /+(p·q)p µ (q2)2qν 6m 6...

  9. [9]

    Stage (ii): imposition of the real-photon kinematics In this stage, the real-photon kinematic conditions q2 = 0, ε·q= 0(C6) are imposed on the unreduced expressions of Sec. C1. All Lorentz structures proportional to eitherq2 or(ε·q)are thereby eliminated. The gamma-matrix orderingγµp /ε /q /γν hasnot yetbeen applied at this stage, so the resulting gauge-f...

  10. [10]

    Stage (iii): application of the gamma-matrix ordering and removal of the spin-1/2contamination The interpolating currentJ P∗ bb µ (x)couples not only to the spin-3/2ground state but also to spin-1/2states with the same quantum numbers, as parametrized in Eq. (30). Following the prescription of Refs. [75, 76], the spin-1/2 contamination is eliminated from ...

  11. [11]

    C7, when combined with the propagator denominator of Eq

    Stage (iv): projection onto the independent Lorentz structures The expressions of Sec. C7, when combined with the propagator denominator of Eq. (C1), contain only Lorentz structures falling into two kinematically orthogonal classes. Structures proportional togµν carry the information on F1(q2)andF 2(q2), while structures proportional toqµqν carry the info...

  12. [12]

    Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consis- tent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK −pDecays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation ofJ/ψpResonances Consis- tent with Pentaquark States inΛ0 b→J/ψK −pDecays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072001.arXiv:1507.03414, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of thePc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (22) (2019) 222001.arXiv:1904. 03947,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.222001

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.222001 2019

  14. [14]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence for a new structure in theJ/ψp andJ/ψ¯psystems inB 0 s →J/ψp¯pdecays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Evidence for a new structure in theJ/ψp andJ/ψ¯psystems inB 0 s →J/ψp¯pdecays, Phys. Rev. 37 Lett. 128 (6) (2022) 062001.arXiv:2108.04720,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.062001

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Con- sistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B- →J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of a J/ψΛResonance Con- sistent with a Strange Pentaquark Candidate in B- →J/ψΛp¯Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (3) (2023) 031901.arXiv:2210.10346,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 131.031901

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nature Phys. 18 (7) (2022) 751–754. arXiv:2109.01038,doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01614-y

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Aaij, et al., Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark T + cc, Nature Commun

    R. Aaij, et al., Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark T + cc, Nature Commun. 13 (1) (2022) 3351.arXiv:2109. 01056,doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30206-w

    doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30206-w 2022

  18. [18]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. L. Guerrieri, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Four-Quark Hadrons: an Updated Re- view, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530002.arXiv: 1411.5997,doi:10.1142/S0217751X15300021

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Esposito, A

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, A. D. Polosa, Multiquark Reso- nances, Phys. Rept. 668 (2017) 1–97.arXiv:1611.07920, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.11.002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki, D. Zieminska, Nonstandard heavy mesons and baryons: Experimental evidence, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015003.arXiv:1708.04012, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, E. S. Swanson, Heavy-Quark QCD Exotica, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93 (2017)143–194. arXiv:1610.04528,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.11.003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Nielsen, F

    M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, S. H. Lee, New Charmo- nium States in QCD Sum Rules: A Concise Review, Phys. Rept. 497 (2010) 41–83.arXiv:0911.1958,doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Brambilla, S

    N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.- P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, C.-Z. Yuan, TheXYZ states: experimental and theoretical status and perspec- tives, Phys. Rept. 873 (2020) 1–154.arXiv:1907.07583, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Agaev, K

    S. Agaev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, Four-quark exotic mesons, Turk. J. Phys. 44 (2) (2020) 95–173.arXiv:2004.12079, doi:10.3906/fiz-2003-15

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, The hidden- charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1–121.arXiv:1601.02092,doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2016.05.004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    A.Ali, J.S.Lange, S.Stone, Exotics: HeavyPentaquarks and Tetraquarks, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97 (2017) 123– 198.arXiv:1706.00610,doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2017.08. 003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015004, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.90.015004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107 (2019) 237–320.arXiv:1903.11976,doi:10.1016/ j.ppnp.2019.04.003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Tetra- and penta-quark structures in the constituent quark model, Symmetry 12 (11) (2020) 1869.arXiv:2009.00238,doi:10.3390/ sym12111869

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy- antiheavy hadronic molecules, Progr. Phys. 41 (2021) 65–93.arXiv:2101.01021,doi:10.13725/j.cnki.pip. 2021.02.001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Chiral per- turbation theory for heavy hadrons and chiral effective field theory for heavy hadronic molecules, Phys. Rept. 1019 (2023) 1–149.arXiv:2204.08716,doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2023.04.003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 (2) (2023) 026201.arXiv:2204.02649,doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Dong, F.-K

    X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, B.-S. Zou, A survey of heavy–heavy hadronic molecules, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73(12)(2021)125201.arXiv:2108.02673,doi:10.1088/ 1572-9494/ac27a2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    R. Chen, A. Hosaka, X. Liu, Heavy molecules and one-σ/ω-exchange model, Phys. Rev. D 96 (11) (2017) 116012.arXiv:1707.08306,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96. 116012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Liu, J.-J

    M.-Z. Liu, J.-J. Xie, L.-S. Geng,X 0(2866)as a D∗ ¯K ∗ molecular state, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) (2020) 091502.arXiv:2008.07389,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 102.091502

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    R. Chen, N. Li, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Dou- bly charmed molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136693.arXiv:2108.12730,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2021.136693

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    K. Chen, B. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Exploration of the doubly charmed molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) (2021) 116017.arXiv:2102.05868,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.103.116017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Shen, Y.-h

    C.-W. Shen, Y.-h. Lin, U.-G. Meißner,P N cc states in a unitarized coupled-channel approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (1) (2023) 70.arXiv:2208.10865,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-023-11177-8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    X. Liu, Y. Tan, X. Chen, D. Chen, H. Huang, J. Ping, Investigation of the doubly charmed analog of the Pc states, Phys. Rev. C 113 (1) (2026) 015208.arXiv:2312. 04390,doi:10.1103/s1sm-skb6

    work page doi:10.1103/s1sm-skb6 2026

  40. [40]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Doubly Charmed Pen- taquarks, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) (2020) 074030.arXiv: 2003.05253,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Shimizu, M

    Y. Shimizu, M. Harada, Hidden Charm Pentaquark Pc(4380)and Doubly Charmed BaryonΞ ∗ cc(4380)as Hadronic Molecule States, Phys. Rev. D 96 (9) (2017) 094012.arXiv:1708.04743,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96. 094012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Guo, Prediction of exotic doubly charmed baryons within chiral effective field theory, Phys

    Z.-H. Guo, Prediction of exotic doubly charmed baryons within chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 96 (7) (2017) 074004.arXiv:1708.04145,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.074004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Q.-S. Zhou, K. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Sur- veying exotic pentaquarks with the typicalQQqq¯qcon- figuration, Phys. Rev. C 98 (4) (2018) 045204.arXiv: 1801.04557,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.045204

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Wang, Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the doubly heavy baryon states and pentaquark states with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (10) (2018) 826.arXiv:1808.09820,doi:10. 1140/epjc/s10052-018-6300-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Y. Xing, Y. Niu, The study of doubly charmed pen- taquarkcc¯qqqwith the SU(3) symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (11) (2021) 978.arXiv:2106.09939,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09730-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Duan, Q.-N

    F.-B. Duan, Q.-N. Wang, Z.-Y. Yang, X.-L. Chen, W. Chen, Doubly charmed pentaquark states in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) (2024) 094018.arXiv: 38 2401.10078,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Wang, Z.-G

    X.-W. Wang, Z.-G. Wang, Doubly-charm and doubly- bottom pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 (17n18) (2024) 2450067. arXiv:2405.00281,doi:10.1142/S0217751X24500672

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of doubly heavy pentaquark states, Eur

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of doubly heavy pentaquark states, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (2022) 936.arXiv:2201.00979,doi:10.1140/epjp/ s13360-022-03125-4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Zhou, F.-L

    H.-Y. Zhou, F.-L. Wang, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, Probing the electromagnetic properties of theΣc(*)D(*)-type doubly charmed molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 106(3)(2022)034034.arXiv:2207.08660,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.034034

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    G.-J. Wang, R. Chen, L. Ma, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Magnetic moments of the hidden-charm pentaquark states, Phys. Rev. D 94 (9) (2016) 094018.arXiv:1605.01337,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    Özdem, K

    U. Özdem, K. Azizi, Electromagnetic multipole mo- ments of theP + c (4380)pentaquark in light-cone QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (5) (2018) 379.arXiv:1803.06831, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5873-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Ortiz-Pacheco, R

    E. Ortiz-Pacheco, R. Bijker, C. Fernández-Ramírez, Hid- den charm pentaquarks: mass spectrum, magnetic mo- ments, and photocouplings, J. Phys. G 46 (6) (2019) 065104.arXiv:1808.10512,doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ ab096d

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Xu, Y.-L

    Y.-J. Xu, Y.-L. Liu, M.-Q. Huang, The magnetic mo- ment ofPc(4312)as a ¯DΣc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J.C81(5)(2021)421.arXiv:2008.07937,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-021-09211-8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of thePc (4312) pentaquark state, Chin

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of thePc (4312) pentaquark state, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2) (2021) 023119. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abd01c

    doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abd01c 2021

  55. [55]

    Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden- charm pentaquark states:P c(4440),P c(4457)and Pcs(4459), Eur

    U. Özdem, Magnetic dipole moments of the hidden- charm pentaquark states:P c(4440),P c(4457)and Pcs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (4) (2021) 277.arXiv: 2102.01996,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09070-3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Li, Z.-W

    M.-W. Li, Z.-W. Liu, Z.-F. Sun, R. Chen, Magnetic mo- ments and transition magnetic moments of Pc and Pcs states, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) (2021) 054016.arXiv: 2106.15053,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic properties of D¯(∗)Ξc’, D¯(∗)Λc, D¯s(∗)Λc and D¯s(∗)Ξc pentaquarks, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138267.arXiv:2303.10649,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138267

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    F.-L. Wang, X. Liu, Higher molecular PψsΛ/Σpen- taquarks arising from theΞc(’,*)D¯1/Ξc(’,*)D¯2* in- teractions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) (2023) 054028.arXiv: 2307.08276,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys

    U. Özdem, Investigation of magnetic moment of Pcs(4338) and Pcs(4459) pentaquark states, Phys. Lett. B 836 (2023) 137635.arXiv:2208.07684,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2022.137635

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    Gao, H.-S

    F. Gao, H.-S. Li, Magnetic moments of hidden-charm strange pentaquark states*, Chin. Phys. C 46 (12) (2022) 123111.arXiv:2112.01823,doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ ac8651

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys

    U. Özdem, Shedding light on the nature of the Pcs(4459) pentaquark state, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) (2025) 074038.arXiv:2411.11442,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 111.074038

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Guo, H.-S

    F. Guo, H.-S. Li, Analysis of the hidden-charm pen- taquark states based on magnetic moment and tran- sition magnetic moment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (4) (2024) 392.arXiv:2304.10981,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-12699-5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Özdem, Magnetic moments of pentaquark states in light-cone sum rules, Eur

    U. Özdem, Magnetic moments of pentaquark states in light-cone sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. A 58 (3) (2022) 46. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00700-2

    doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00700-2 2022

  64. [64]

    Wang, S.-Q

    F.-L. Wang, S.-Q. Luo, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, Exploring the electromagnetic properties of the Ξc(’,*)D¯s* andΩc(*)D¯s* molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) (2023) 034006.arXiv:2210.02809,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Wang, H.-Y

    F.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, X. Liu, What can we learn from the electromagnetic properties of hidden- charm molecular pentaquarks with single strangeness?, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) (2022) 054020.arXiv:2208.10756, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic proper- ties, Eur

    U. Özdem, Analysis of the isospin eigenstate¯DΣc, ¯D∗Σc, and ¯DΣ∗ c pentaquarks by their electromagnetic proper- ties, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 769.arXiv:2401. 12678,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13124-7 2024

  67. [67]

    H.-S. Li, F. Guo, Y.-D. Lei, F. Gao, Magnetic mo- ments and axial charges of the octet hidden-charm molec- ular pentaquark family, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) (2024) 094027.arXiv:2401.14767,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 109.094027

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys

    H.-S. Li, Molecular pentaquark magnetic moments in heavy pentaquark chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) (2024) 114039.arXiv:2401.14759,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114039

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Özdem, Investigation on the electromagnetic prop- erties of theD (∗)Σ(∗) c molecules, Eur

    U. Özdem, Investigation on the electromagnetic prop- erties of theD (∗)Σ(∗) c molecules, Eur. Phys. J. A 61 (1) (2025) 10.arXiv:2405.07273,doi:10.1140/ epja/s10050-024-01477-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their elec- tromagnetic form factors, Phys

    U. Özdem, Elucidating the nature of hidden-charm pentaquark states with spin-32 through their elec- tromagnetic form factors, Phys. Lett. B 851 (2024) 138551.arXiv:2402.03802,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2024.138551

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Mutuk, X.-W

    H. Mutuk, X.-W. Kang, Unveiling the structure of hidden-bottom strange pentaquarks via magnetic mo- ments, Phys. Lett. B 855 (2024) 138772.arXiv:2405. 07066,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138772

    arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pen- taquark states, Eur

    H. Mutuk, Magnetic moments of hidden-bottom pen- taquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (8) (2024) 874.arXiv: 2403.16616,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13263-x

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Özdem, Insight into the nature of theP c(4457) and related pentaquarks, Eur

    U. Özdem, Insight into the nature of theP c(4457) and related pentaquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 624.arXiv:2409.09449,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14323-6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Özdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of theP c(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a di- quark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur

    U. Özdem, Probing the electromagnetic structure of theP c(4337)+ pentaquark: insights from a di- quark–diquark–antiquark picture forJ P = 1 2 − and 3 2 − states, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (6) (2025) 704.arXiv: 2506.04345,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14439-9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Zhu, F.-L

    S.-H. Zhu, F.-L. Wang, X. Liu, Electromagnetic char- acteristics as probes into the inner structures of the predictedΞ (′,∗) c D(∗) s molecular states, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (4) (2026) 385.arXiv:2510.18492,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-026-15552-z

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  76. [76]

    Özdem, Unveiling the electromagnetic structure and intrinsic dynamics of spin-3/2 hidden-charm pen- taquarks: A comprehensive QCD analysis, Chin

    U. Özdem, Unveiling the electromagnetic structure and intrinsic dynamics of spin-3/2 hidden-charm pen- taquarks: A comprehensive QCD analysis, Chin. Phys. 49(10)(2025)103106.arXiv:2504.13488,doi:10.1088/ 39 1674-1137/ade95a

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin- 3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic tomography of spin- 3 2 hidden-charm strange pentaquarks, JHEP 02 (2026) 207. arXiv:2510.26893,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)207

    arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: a window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ∗ c molecularstructure, Eur.Phys

    U. Özdem, Electromagnetic form factors: a window into theDΛc,D ∗Λc, andDΛ∗ c molecularstructure, Eur.Phys. J.C86(6)(2026)675.arXiv:2511.16052,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-026-15940-5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  79. [79]

    Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur

    U. Özdem, Hidden-charm pentaquarks: electromagnetic structure in a diquark–diquark–antiquark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (4) (2026) 359.arXiv:2603.19151,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15591-6

    arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    V. L. Chernyak, I. R. Zhitnitsky, B meson exclusive de- cays into baryons, Nucl. Phys. B 345 (1990) 137–172. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-H

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90612-h 1990

Showing first 80 references.