Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Partial vision leads to an unexpected emergent collective behavior in active aligning particles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A generalized Vicsek model with two non-overlapping vision cones shows that restricting lateral sight destabilizes global order and produces ultra-dense traveling bands, while forward- versus backward-biased vision drives either strong clus

desk verdict The paper's central equation does not implement the advertised spatial vision cones, so the claimed non-reciprocal mechanisms and phases are not supported as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27819 v1 pith:TSGGLKA4 submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.soft physics.comp-ph

Raúl Molina-Prados Lallena , José Martín-Roca , Chantal Valeriani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.comp-ph
keywords blind-spotVicsekmodelvisionconesnon-reciprocalinteractionscollectivemotionactivemattertravelingbandscross-seaphasedensityfluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using a generalized Vicsek model in which each particle aligns only with neighbors inside two non-overlapping angular vision cones, the authors ask how partial, direction-dependent perception reshapes collective motion. They establish three main results: narrowing the lateral cones (small aperture alpha) shifts the order-disorder transition to lower noise and promotes highly compressed traveling bands, including a grid-like 'cross sea' phase; orienting the cones forward (small beta) creates dense 'follow-the-leader' bands; orienting them backward (large beta) yields an exceptionally homogeneous ordered flock with suppressed density fluctuations. The work matters because it shows that non-reciprocal perception alone can select among qualitatively different flocking states, and that the total vision area, not its orientation, sets the critical noise. These are claims about a specific model; whether they survive a fully spatial implementation of the vision cones is a separate issue.

What carries the argument

The key object is the modified neighbor matrix of the 'blind spot Vicsek model': particle i interacts with particle j if they are within distance R0 and the headings satisfy |theta_i − theta_j| in I or |theta_i + theta_j| in I, where I = [|beta−alpha/2|, |beta+alpha/2|] is defined by cone aperture alpha and orientation beta. This rule replaces the isotropic metric neighborhood of the Vicsek model and makes the interaction matrix non-symmetric, since i may see j but not vice versa. The two parameters alpha and beta control the total field-of-view area (2*alpha*R0^2) and its front-back asymmetry, and the paper uses an auxiliary 'vision density' rho_v = <N_v>/(2*alpha*R0^2) to link local neighb

What would settle it

Replace Eq. (4)'s heading-based condition with a spatial-cone condition, e.g., require the angle of the displacement vector r_ij relative to the observer's heading to lie in two wedges of aperture alpha centered at ±beta, keeping everything else identical. If the cross-sea pattern, the follow-the-leader bands, and the backward homogeneous flock do not appear, the reported phenomena are due to the heading-similarity filter, not to partial spatial vision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that replacing the isotropic circular neighborhood of the standard Vicsek model with two non-overlapping vision cones (angular width alpha, centered at angle beta from the heading) changes the emergent phases of aligning active particles. Narrowing symmetric lateral cones (beta=90°) lowers the critical noise, sharpens the order-disorder transition, and produces ultra-dense narrow traveling bands; at alpha=30° these form a perpendicular 'cross sea'. Breaking front-back symmetry at fixed alpha=90° makes interactions non-reciprocal: forward-biased vision (beta=45°) drives 'follow-the-leader' clustering into dense parallel bands, while backward-biased vision (beta=135°) stabiliz

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Eq. (4) implements two non-overlapping angular vision cones in physical space; in fact, the condition selects neighbors by their heading difference (or sum) relative to the observer, not by the angle of the line connecting them, so the blind-spot interpretation and all associated phase interpretations rest on this mapping.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the phase diagram of the two-cone generalized Vicsek model contains, for the first time in a single minimal model, a cross-sea phase, ultra-dense narrow bands, and a low-fluctuation homogeneous flock, all tunable by cone aperture alpha and orientation beta.
  • Forward-biased vision produces 'follow-the-leader' bands that survive moderate volume exclusion, making them plausible targets for experiments with small robotic swarms or active granular matter.
  • Backward-biased vision suppresses density fluctuations; the paper's tentative near-hyperuniform exponent at beta=45° would be a notable finding if confirmed by finite-size scaling.
  • The invariance of critical noise with beta—while alpha is fixed—implies that the polar order transition is governed by the total field-of-view area, a prediction that can be tested in related non-reciprocal alignment models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The neighbor rule in Eq. (4) filters on heading differences or sums, not on the spatial angle of the line joining i and j; taken literally, the 'vision cones' are heading-similarity filters, and the biological interpretation and the reported phase labels depend on this implementation matching the intended spatial-cone picture.
  • A decisive test is to rerun the same model with a genuinely spatial cone rule: keep neighbors only if the angle of the displacement vector r_ij lies in two wedges of width alpha centered at ±beta relative to theta_i. If the cross-sea, follow-the-leader, and homogeneous-backward states do not reappear, the phenomena are artifacts of the heading filter.
  • The insensitivity of the global order transition to beta hints at a possible general principle: for local alignment rules of this kind, global order may depend only on the number of interaction partners, not their angular distribution. This is a testable hypothesis beyond the present model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a 'blind spot Vicsek model' with two angular vision cones, parametrized by aperture α and orientation β, and reports extensive simulations showing that restricted lateral vision destabilizes order, produces dense traveling bands, and that forward/backward-biased cones lead to distinct collective phases via claimed non-reciprocal interactions. The authors also study the effect of volume exclusion. The central novelty is the claim that non-overlapping spatial vision cones produce a rich phase diagram, including a cross-sea phase and a low-fluctuation homogeneous flock.

Significance. If the model were implemented as described, the paper would provide a useful exploration of anisotropic perception in Vicsek-type active matter, with large-scale simulations (N≈2×10^5) and systematic phase diagrams. The authors are also appropriately cautious about the tentative hyperuniformity signature and make an effort to connect to experimental realizations. However, the paper's central claim is not supported by the stated model: Eq. (4) does not implement spatial vision cones, and the interaction matrix is symmetric, contradicting the paper's repeated non-reciprocity interpretation. The core mechanisms invoked in the abstract and Sections IV A and IV B therefore do not follow from the equations as written. This is a load-bearing flaw, not a presentation issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [II A, Eq. (4)] Eq. (4) defines n_ij using |θ_i − θ_j| ∈ I or |θ_i + θ_j| ∈ I, i.e., conditions on the particles' heading differences and sums. This is not a spatial vision cone rule, which would require the angle of the displacement vector x_j − x_i relative to θ_i to lie in the cone interval. As written, neighbors are selected by heading similarity, not by position in physical space. The entire interpretation in Section IV A (lateral blind spots) and Section IV B (forward- vs backward-biased vision) is therefore not supported by the stated model. Moreover, the condition is symmetric under i↔j, so n_ij = n_ji for every pair; the claim that the interaction matrix is 'intrinsically non-symmetric' (Section II A and repeated throughout) is false as written. This invalidates the mechanism for the β-dependent phases and the 'follow-the-leader' / 'negative feedback' explanations.
  2. [II A, Eq. (1)] The orientation update is a scalar average of angles, θ_i(t+Δt) = (1/N) ∑_j n_ij θ_j(t) + noise, not the vectorial Vicsek alignment θ_i → arg(∑_j e^{iθ_j}) + noise. The scalar average is ill-defined for periodic angles near ±π and introduces an artificial dependence on the total particle number N rather than on the number of neighbors. If this equation was actually implemented, it is a nonstandard variant whose quantitative phase diagram (critical noise, Binder cumulant, density fluctuations) cannot be directly compared with the standard Vicsek results invoked throughout the paper. The authors do not justify this choice or discuss its consequences.
  3. [IV A, IV B] Because Eq. (4) does not implement spatial vision cones, the specific claims that reducing α leads to lateral-only vision and that varying β breaks front-back symmetry are not consequences of the stated model. The 'cross sea' phase in Fig. 2(a) (α=30°, η=0.45) is attributed to 'purely lateral, narrow vision cones,' but the model actually implements a heading-similarity filter. The link to Kürsten & Ihle (Ref. 41) is therefore not established. Similarly, the non-reciprocal chase mechanism described in Section IV B is absent from the symmetric matrix of Eq. (4). These are not minor interpretive overstatements; they are the paper's main conclusions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (12) and Fig. 3(h), 5(h) captions] Eq. (12) defines ρ_v = ⟨N_v⟩/(2αR_0^2), while the figure captions for Fig. 3(h) and Fig. 5(h) state ρ_v = N_v/(αR_0^2). The factor of 2 is inconsistent and should be clarified.
  2. [General] There are numerous typographical errors: 'symmertic' (Sec. II A), 'studding' and 'studiend' (Sec. IV B), 'significanly' in Sec. IV C, and inconsistent reference spellings. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [Bibliography] Several references are duplicated (e.g., Refs. 28/42, 41/55, 1? etc.) and the bibliography contains many redundant entries. Also, Ref. 5 lists 'G. Volpe' twice.
  4. [Sec. II A] The phrase 'cross-eye angle β' is unclear; consider using 'cone orientation' or 'cone center angle' consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's results are direct simulation observables, with no load-bearing fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or definition that reduces a prediction to its inputs.

full rationale

This is a simulation study, and the reported quantities—polar order parameter, Binder cumulant, critical noise, density fluctuation exponents, and phase snapshots—are direct outputs of the stated particle model, not quantities obtained by fitting a parameter to a target. Eq. (4) defines the neighbor rule and is then used to evolve the system; no parameter is tuned to reproduce the observed phases, and the β-invariance of ηc is presented as an observed regularity rather than as a fitted relation disguised as a prediction. The self-citations present in the bibliography (e.g., Refs. 21, 22, 65) are contextual and are not invoked to justify the model's central claims or to exclude alternatives. The manuscript even flags its hyperuniformity observation as tentative and requiring finite-size scaling, which is the opposite of circular forcing. The substantive caveat noted by the reader—that Eq. (4), as written, filters on heading differences and sums and is symmetric under i↔j, so the 'spatial vision cone' and 'non-reciprocal' interpretations are not implied by the written rule—is a model-implementation or interpretation concern, not a circularity reduction: no claim in the paper is equivalent by construction to its inputs. That concern belongs in a correctness review, not in a circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces two hand-chosen geometric parameters (α, β) and a noise amplitude η; the core assumption that Eq. (4) corresponds to spatial vision cones is ad hoc to the paper and, as written, appears false, replacing the advertised position-based cones with a heading-based filter. Otherwise the model rests on standard Vicsek machinery (constant speed, metric cutoff, additive angular noise) and a WCA repulsion for volume exclusion.

free parameters (5)
  • α (vision cone aperture) = swept 5°–180°
    Central control parameter; the phase diagram is mapped over it. Not fitted to data but chosen ad hoc to define the model.
  • β (vision cone orientation, 'cross-eye angle') = swept 45°–135°
    Breaks front-back symmetry; key control for non-reciprocal phases.
  • η (noise amplitude) = swept 0.1–0.7
    Control parameter; critical noise ηc extracted from Binder cumulant is a headline result.
  • σ/R0 (particle size / interaction radius) = 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4
    Volume-exclusion ratio; determines whether banded phases survive.
  • Self-propulsion speed v0=0.5 R0/τ0, Δt=0.1τ0
    Standard Vicsek parameters adopted without sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scalar arithmetic mean of angles in Eq. (1) is a valid proxy for the standard Vicsek vectorial alignment update.
    Eq. (1) averages θ_j directly rather than unit vectors; near the ±π boundary this differs from the canonical Vicsek model.
  • ad hoc to paper Neighbor selection in Eq. (4) with |θ_i ± θ_j| ∈ I corresponds to particles located inside the two spatial vision cones of Fig. 1.
    The equation uses heading differences, not the angular position of neighbor j relative to particle i's heading; the equivalence is assumed without comment.
  • domain assumption Steady state is reached within 10^5–10^6 timesteps and finite-size effects are negligible at N≈2×10^5.
    The paper uses this to justify phase characterization, but only one system size is used for the main phase diagrams.
  • domain assumption The WCA repulsion in Eq. (5)-(6) correctly models volume exclusion while preserving constant speed; the strength ε is not specified.
    The WCA potential is standard, but ε is left implicit and no sensitivity test is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Partial vision leads to an unexpected emergent collective behavior in active aligning particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TSGGLKA4

@misc{pith2026260727819,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Partial vision leads to an unexpected emergent collective behavior in active aligning particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TSGGLKA4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27819}
}
read the original abstract

The Vicsek Model represents a paradigmatic framework for understanding the collective motion of active aligning particles, traditionally assuming isotropic interaction fields. Inspired by biological systems characterized by limited perception and blind spots, we propose a generalized Vicsek model featuring two distinct, non-overlapping angular vision cones. We systematically investigate the non-equilibrium phase behavior of this system by tuning the aperture area ({\alpha}) and the front-back orientation (\b{eta}) of the cones. Our results reveal that restricting the lateral vision area destabilizes global order, shifts the critical noise, and induces highly dense traveling bands. Furthermore, breaking the front-back symmetry introduces non-reciprocal interactions that profoundly alter the emergent spatial structures: forward-biased vision drives strong clustering through "follow the leader" alignment, whereas backward-biased alignment stabilizes an exceptionally homogeneous flocking state with suppressed density fluctuations. Finally, we incorporate short-range volume exclusion, demonstrating that the structural integrity of these novel tightly-clustered phases is highly sensitive to steric interactions. Our work provides new insights into the interplay between non-reciprocal perception, spatial anisotropy, and physical constraints in active matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27819 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Representation of first neighbors matrix, equation (3). The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. summarizes the global behavior of the system in the α-η plane. As expected, for large values of α the system reproduces the phenomenology of the standard Vicsek Model, exhibiting a transition from a disordered phase at large noise to an ordered phase at low noise. This transition is clearly visible in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Polar order parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Polar order parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Snapshot of the system for different combinations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The XY model with vision cone: non-reciprocal vs

    Bandini, Gabriele and Venturelli, Davide and Loos, Sarah A M and Jelic, Asja and Gambassi, Andrea , year=. The XY model with vision cone: non-reciprocal vs. reciprocal interactions , volume=. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , publisher=. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/adc243 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/adc243

  2. [2]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    From phase to microphase separation in flocking models: The essential role of nonequilibrium fluctuations , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Nonreciprocity as a generic route to traveling states , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  4. [4]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Dry active matter exhibits a self-organized cross sea phase , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  5. [5]

    The Physics of the Vicsek model , volume=

    Ginelli, Francesco , year=. The Physics of the Vicsek model , volume=. The European Physical Journal Special Topics , publisher=. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2016-60066-8 , number=

    work page doi:10.1140/epjst/e2016-60066-8

  6. [6]

    and Bandini, Gabriele and Venturelli, Davide and Loos, Sarah A

    Du, Y. and Bandini, Gabriele and Venturelli, Davide and Loos, Sarah A. M. and Jelić, Asja and Gambassi, Andrea , journal =. Collective behavior of the non-reciprocal vision cone. 2025 , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.???.? , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025 2025

  7. [7]

    Active particles in complex and crowded environments , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , year =

  8. [8]

    Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews , author =. Eur. Phys. J. E , year =

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Onset of Collective and Cohesive Motion , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =

  2. [10]

    Small Obstacle in a Large Polar Flock , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , year =

  3. [11]

    Giant number fluctuations in dry active polar fluids: A shocking analogy with lightning rods , author =. J. Chem. Phys. , year =

  4. [12]

    Communications Physics , year =

    Topological flocking models in spatially heterogeneous environments , author =. Communications Physics , year =

  5. [13]

    arXiv preprint , eprint =

    Self-trapping of active particles with non-reciprocal interactions in disordered media , author =. arXiv preprint , eprint =. 2024 , note =

    2024

  6. [14]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Large-Scale Patterns in a Minimal Cognitive Flocking Model: Incidental Leaders, Nematic Patterns, and Aggregates , author =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  7. [15]

    arXiv preprint , eprint =

    The Physics of the Vicsek Model , author =. arXiv preprint , eprint =. 2015 , note =

    2015

  8. [16]

    Physical Review E , year =

    Active matter flocking via predictive alignment , author =. Physical Review E , year =. doi:10.1103/fv6f-r9w9 , url =

    doi

  9. [17]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Flocking without Alignment Interactions in Attractive Active Brownian Particles , author =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  10. [18]

    arXiv preprint , eprint =

    Flocking Beyond One Species: Novel Phase Coexistence in a Generalized Two-Species Vicsek Model , author =. arXiv preprint , eprint =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  11. [19]

    arXiv preprint , eprint =

    Metamorphosis of collective patterns modulated by non‑reciprocal interactions , author =. arXiv preprint , eprint =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  12. [20]

    Fore-aft asymmetric flocking , volume=

    Chen, Qiu-shi and Patelli, Aurelio and Chaté, Hugues and Ma, Yu-qiang and Shi, Xia-qing , year=. Fore-aft asymmetric flocking , volume=. Physical Review E , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physreve.96.020601 , number=

    doi

  13. [21]

    Dry Active Matter Exhibits a Self-Organized Cross Sea Phase , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.188003 , url =

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Novel Type of Phase Transition in a System of Self-Driven Particles , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1995 , publisher =

    1995

  15. [23]

    , title =

    Bajec, Iztok Lebar and Heppner, Frank H. , title =. Animal Behaviour , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  16. [24]

    and Vandewalle, N

    Becco, Ch. and Vandewalle, N. and Delcourt, J. and Poncin, P. , title =. Physica A , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  17. [25]

    Newton , volume =

    Du, Yu and Cao, Yunpeng and Liu, Wenyu and Li, Yao , title =. Newton , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  18. [26]

    Solon, A. P. and Chaté, H. and Tailleur, J. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  19. [27]

    and Bertin, Eric and Chaté, Hugues , title =

    Patelli, Aurelio and Djafer-Cherif, Ilyas and Aranson, Igor S. and Bertin, Eric and Chaté, Hugues , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  20. [28]

    , title =

    Chaté, Hugues and Solon, Alexandre P. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  21. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17617 , year =

    Lardet, Eloise and Chen, Letian and Bertrand, Thibault , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17617 , year =

  22. [30]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Jin, Ruizhi and Dong, Kejun , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  23. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03591 , year =

    Paul, Subhadip and Chaudhuri, Debasish , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.03591 , year =

  24. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21338 , year =

    Paul, Subhadip and Saha, Arnab , title =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21338 , year =

  25. [33]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , volume =

    Murase, Nobuaki and Isobe, Masaharu , title =. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , volume =

  26. [34]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Jin, Ruizhi and Dong, Kejun , title =. Physical Review E , volume =

  27. [35]

    Bandini, Gabriele and Venturelli, Davide and Loos, Sarah A. M. and Jelic, Asja and Gambassi, Andrea , title =. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  28. [36]

    and Klapp, Sabine H

    Kreienkamp, Kim L. and Klapp, Sabine H. L. , title =. New Journal of Physics , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  29. [37]

    and Fischer, A

    Jayaram, A. and Fischer, A. and Speck, T. , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  30. [38]

    and Klapp, Sabine H

    Kreienkamp, Kim L. and Klapp, Sabine H. L. , title =. Communications Physics , volume =

  31. [39]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Liu, Zhong-Yuan and Zheng, Bo and Nian, Lei-Lei and Xiong, Long , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  32. [40]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Chaté, Hugues and Ginelli, Francesco and Grégoire, Guillaume and Raynaud, Florence , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  33. [41]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Durve, Mihir and Sayeed, Ahmed , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  34. [42]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Barberis, Lucas and Peruani, Fernando , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  35. [43]

    and Pazó, D

    Montbrió, E. and Pazó, D. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  36. [44]

    and Chaté, H

    Solon, A. and Chaté, H. and Toner, J. and Tailleur, J. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  37. [45]

    and Baskaran, A

    You, Z. and Baskaran, A. and Marchetti, M. C. , title =. PNAS , volume =

  38. [46]

    Loos, Sarah A. M. and Klapp, Sabine H. L. and Martynec, Thomas , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  39. [47]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Jentsch, Patrick and Lee, Chiu Fan , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  40. [48]

    and Klapp, Sabine H

    Kreienkamp, Kim L. and Klapp, Sabine H. L. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  41. [49]

    Physical Review Letters , volume =

    Vicsek, Tamás and Czirók, András and Ben-Jacob, Eshel and Cohen, Inon and Shochet, Ofer , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    1995

  42. [50]

    and Ciarchi, M

    Das, S. and Ciarchi, M. and Zhou, Z. and Yan, J. and Zhang, J. and Alert, R. , title =. Physical Review X , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  43. [51]

    Marchetti, M. C. and Joanny, J. F. and Ramaswamy, S. and Liverpool, T. B. and Prost, J. and Rao, Madan and Simha, R. Aditi , title =. Reviews of Modern Physics , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  44. [52]

    and Viscido, Steven V

    Parrish, Julia K. and Viscido, Steven V. and Grünbaum, Daniel , title =. Biol. Bull. , volume =

  45. [53]

    2025 , type =

    Muñoz Jaramillo, Dickinson Omar , title =. 2025 , type =

    2025

  46. [54]

    Hemelrijk, C. K. , title =. Behavioral Ecology , volume =

  47. [55]

    and Cabibbo, N

    Ballerini, M. and Cabibbo, N. and Candelier, R. and Cavagna, A. and Cisbani, E. and Giardina, I. and Orlandi, A. and Parisi, G. and Procaccini, A. and Viale, M. and Zdravkovic, V. , title =. PNAS , volume =. 2008 , doi =

    2008

  48. [56]

    The European Physical Journal Special Topics , volume =

    Ginelli, Francesco , title =. The European Physical Journal Special Topics , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  49. [57]

    Physical Review E , volume =

    Giraldo-Barreto, Julian and Holubec, Viktor , title =. Physical Review E , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  50. [58]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Luo, Nan and Li, Liangwei and Yang, Mingji and Peng, Yang , title =. arXiv preprint , year =

  51. [59]

    Scientific Reports , volume =

    Knežević, Miloš and Welker, Till and Stark, Holger , title =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  52. [60]

    Negi, R. S. and Winkler, R. G. and Gompper, G. , title =. Physical Review Research , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  53. [61]

    and Gompper, Gerhard , title =

    Iyer, Priyanka and Fedosov, Dmitry A. and Gompper, Gerhard , title =. Communications Physics , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  54. [62]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=

    The influence of obstacles on the collective motion of self-propelled objects , author=. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  55. [63]

    Soft matter , volume=

    Trapping flocking particles with asymmetric obstacles , author=. Soft matter , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  56. [64]

    Soft Matter , volume=

    Collective motion of energy depot active disks , author=. Soft Matter , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  57. [65]

    Scientific reports , volume=

    Collective motion of active particles exhibiting non-reciprocal orientational interactions , author=. Scientific reports , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  58. [66]

    The European Physical Journal E , volume=

    Collective behavior of Vicsek particles without and with obstacles , author=. The European Physical Journal E , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.