REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Heterotic Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation is the Jacobi identity of a single mega-space current algebra.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 21:14 UTC pith:DGPLBSVZ

load-bearing objection Solid Poláček–Siegel extension that recovers the F-sector Bianchi from Jacobi, but the abstract overclaims full Green–Schwarz. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27988 v1 pith:DGPLBSVZ submitted 2026-07-30 hep-th

Mega-Space Current Algebra and Green-Schwarz Geometry in Heterotic String Theory

Machiko Hatsuda , Shin Sasaki , Masaya Yata This is my paper

classification hep-th

keywords heterotic stringT-dualitymega-spaceGreen-Schwarzcurrent algebraChern-Simonsdouble field theoryα'-corrections

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper places the Lorentz spin connection and the heterotic Yang-Mills connection inside one enlarged worldsheet current algebra on a mega-space that also makes T-duality manifest. The Chern-Simons structures that correct the three-form flux are not added by hand; they appear as components of the generalized vielbein and curvature of that algebra. The Green-Schwarz condition that cancels the anomaly is then identical to the Jacobi identity for the stringy covariant derivatives. A sympathetic reader cares because the long-standing parallel between torsionful gravity and gauge sectors becomes a single geometric fact about the currents, rather than two separate ingredients tuned to match.

Core claim

When Lorentz generators, dual Lorentz partners, doubled momenta, and non-Abelian gauge currents are packaged into one mega-space affine algebra, the heterotic Chern-Simons structures embed in the generalized vielbeins and curvatures, and the Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation condition follows directly from the Jacobi identity of the stringy covariant derivatives (the “nachos” operators).

What carries the argument

The “nachos” operators ▷_M: the extended current generators whose equal-time algebra defines generalized torsion and curvature; their Jacobi identity forces the Bianchi identity that is the Green-Schwarz condition relating dH to F∧F.

Load-bearing premise

After torsion is fixed, the undetermined symmetric piece of the Lorentz connection is set by hand to the ordinary spacetime formula, and the dilaton is inserted only after reducing to ordinary spacetime.

What would settle it

Evaluate the totally antisymmetric mega-space curvature R_[abcd] under the physical section condition without imposing the hand-chosen symmetric connection; if it does not reproduce D_[a H_bcd] proportional to F_[ab F_cd], the central claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

Lorentz and Yang-Mills Chern-Simons terms arise in parallel from one current algebra rather than being inserted separately.
The Bergshoeff–de Roo parallelism of torsionful Lorentz and gauge connections has a current-algebra origin in mega-space geometry.
Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation is a consistency condition of the worldsheet algebra, not an external constraint.
After the section condition, the same algebra yields the heterotic curvature tensors and the standard low-energy Lagrangian density.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Deriving the missing α′ tr(R∧R) piece inside the same current algebra would complete a fully algebraic Green-Schwarz mechanism.
Keeping higher or deformed generators in the mega-space algebra is a natural route to organized all-order α′ corrections.
Matching this curvature hierarchy against other duality-covariant Green-Schwarz constructions could unify current-algebra and tensor-hierarchy languages.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

Solid Poláček–Siegel extension that recovers the F-sector Bianchi from Jacobi, but the abstract overclaims full Green–Schwarz.

read the letter

The real news is a careful mega-space current algebra that puts Lorentz and heterotic gauge currents in one Poláček–Siegel-style frame, then extracts ω, H, and F from torsion constraints and gets D_[a H_bcd] ∝ F∧F from the ▷_M Jacobi identity. That step is genuine and written with explicit indices; it is not a rehash of gauged DFT or the all-order mega-space GS papers.

What they do well is the algebra itself: the extended generators (3.5)–(3.7), the mega-vielbein packing ω, E, and A, the torsion formulas, and the reduction to the expected heterotic pieces under the physical section. The parallel treatment of Lorentz and YM connections is kept geometrically distinct rather than forced into one internal gauge sector. For people already in current-algebra DFT / α′ corrections, the calculation is usable.

The soft spot that matters is the abstract. Full heterotic GS is dH ∝ (tr F∧F − tr R∧R). They only derive the F half; §5 says outright they could not get α′ tr(R∧R). So “the Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation condition follows from the Jacobi identity” is stronger than (4.37)–(4.41). The geometric-embedding claim for Lorentz CS is correspondingly incomplete. Two lesser choices also sit in the reduction: the symmetric part of ω is set by hand to the ordinary non-doubled expression, and the dilaton is inserted after going to the D-dimensional action. Neither kills the F-sector result, but both mean the Lagrangian match is partly by construction.

Circularity is mild theory-building, not tautology—the Jacobi→Bianchi step is real once the YM currents are in. Citations look appropriate; math is followable from the text.

This is for the DFT / heterotic α′ / generalized-geometry crowd, not a broad audience. It deserves a serious referee with the claim scoped to geometric embedding plus the F-sector Bianchi. I would engage if that is your lane; fix the abstract wording and the missing Lorentz CS is the natural next question, not a reason to ignore the algebra.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Poláček–Siegel current-algebra approach to a heterotic mega-space that packages doubled translations, dual Lorentz generators Σ, and non-Abelian gauge currents into a single affine algebra of “nachos” operators ▷_M. Generalized vielbeins (4.3)–(4.4) encode the doubled metric/B-field, Lorentz connection ω, and Yang–Mills field A. Torsion constraints plus the physical section condition recover the standard heterotic structures H = dB + CS(A), the anholonomy c, and F (4.23)–(4.24). The Jacobi identity of the ▷_A algebra yields a totally antisymmetric Bianchi identity whose spacetime reduction is D_[a H_bcd] ∝ F_[ab F_cd] (4.37)–(4.41). The resulting particle-limit curvature and Lagrangian (4.32)–(4.36) reproduce the expected heterotic bosonic terms involving H² and F² (with dilaton inserted after reduction). The authors explicitly note that the parallel α' tr(R∧R) contribution is not obtained.

Significance. If the construction is sound, it supplies a worldsheet-current origin for the parallel appearance of torsionful Lorentz and Yang–Mills data in heterotic α'-geometry, complementing gauged DFT and mega-space tensor-hierarchy approaches. The explicit packing of ω and A into one mega-vielbein, and the derivation of the F-sector Bianchi from the Jacobi identity of stringy covariant derivatives, are concrete technical contributions. The framework is potentially useful for organizing BdR-type identifications in a T-duality covariant language. The missing Lorentz Chern–Simons piece, however, means the paper does not yet deliver a complete current-algebraic account of the Green–Schwarz mechanism; its significance is therefore that of a partial but nontrivial embedding rather than a full geometric derivation of heterotic anomaly cancellation.

major comments (3)

[Abstract; §§1, 4.3, 5; Eqs. (4.37)–(4.41)] Abstract and §1 claim that “the Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation condition follows from the Jacobi identity” of the nachos operators. What is actually derived in (4.37)–(4.41) is only the gauge half: D_[a H_bcd] ∝ F_[ab|^γ F_|cd]γ. Full heterotic GS is dH ∝ (tr F∧F − tr R∧R). Section 5 states explicitly that the α' tr(R∧R) term was not obtained. The abstract, title (“Green-Schwarz Geometry”), and introductory framing must be revised to match the proven F-sector Bianchi; otherwise the central claim overreaches the calculation.
[§4.3, Eq. (4.25); also (4.32)–(4.36)] After the totally antisymmetric torsion constraint fixes only ω_[ABC], the symmetric part of the Lorentz connection is set by hand to the ordinary non-doubled expression ω_ab^c = ½(c_ab^c + c^c_(ab)) in (4.25). This choice, together with the restriction ∂_μ = ∂̃_m = 0, is what produces the standard heterotic curvature and Lagrangian (4.32)–(4.36). The paper should justify why this is the unique (or preferred) mega-space completion, or show that the physical H²/F² content is independent of the undetermined symmetric piece; otherwise the match to heterotic supergravity is partly an input.
[§§1, 4.2–4.3, 5; Eqs. (4.21)–(4.24), (4.32)–(4.33)] The geometric-embedding claim for Lorentz Chern–Simons structures into generalized vielbeins and curvatures is incomplete. Torsion identifies ω_[ABC] with H/c/F pieces (4.21)–(4.24), and curvature (4.27)–(4.33) includes H² and F² corrections, but never generates a Lorentz CS contribution to H itself. Given that BdR parallelism and full GS are the stated motivations, the manuscript should either outline a concrete route to tr(R∧R) within the same algebra or clearly demote that goal to future work in the abstract and introduction, not only in the concluding paragraph.

minor comments (4)

[§4.3, footnote and Eq. (4.36)] Dilaton kinetic and measure terms are added only after reduction to D dimensions (footnote in §4.3), rather than from a mega-space condition ∇_A d = 0 as in standard DFT. A short remark on why the Siegel density is not lifted to the mega-connection would help readers compare with the DFT literature.
[§§3–4] Notation for left/right and doubled indices (m vs m', P vs P̃, a vs a) is dense; a compact index table early in §3 or §4 would reduce ambiguity when reading (4.22)–(4.24) and (4.32).
[§4.1, Eq. (4.3); §4.3, Eq. (4.27)] The rank-four ambiguity r_ABCD is introduced in (4.3) and used to restore R_ABCD = R_CDAB, but its dynamical status (pure gauge vs physical) is not discussed. One sentence would clarify whether it affects the physical Lagrangian.
[Throughout; Abstract; §4.2] Typos/style: “Poláček” spelling varies (Poláček / Poláček); “nachos” is informal for a journal abstract—consider “extended generators” or keep with a brief definition at first use only. Eq. (4.10) K-ambiguity discussion is correct but could be shortened.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Mild theory-building recovery of known heterotic structures via chosen torsion constraints and vielbein ansatz; Jacobi→Bianchi step is real but only re-derives the standard dH∼F∧F identity once CS(A) is already built into H.

specific steps

ansatz smuggled in via citation [§4.1 eqs. (4.3)–(4.4); also (4.25) and footnote in §4.3]
"It is convenient to choose the following gauge for the background field E_AM including the Lorentz connection ω_AMN [25] as well as the gravitational vielbein E_AM and the non-Abelian gauge field A_mμ [32] ... We assume the symmetric part as the same as the non-doubled geometry in the (2.4) as ω_ab^c = 1/2 (c_ab^c + c^c_(ab)). ... After imposing the physical section condition and taking the particle limit, we supplement the curvature contribution with the standard spacetime dilaton terms."

The mega-vielbein is parametrized by hand so that ω and A sit in the slots that later produce H with CS(A) under the torsion constraint; the residual symmetric ω and the dilaton are then set to the ordinary heterotic expressions to match the known D-dimensional Lagrangian. This steers the “derived” effective theory toward the standard answer rather than uniquely predicting it from the mega-space algebra alone. Mild ansatz-steering, not a definitional closed loop.
self definitional [§4.3 eqs. (4.23)–(4.24) then (4.37)–(4.41); abstract]
"H_mnl = 1/2 (∂_[m B_nl] + A_[mμ ∂_n A_l]μ) + A_mμ A_nν A_lλ f_μνλ ... R_[abcd] = 2/3 D_[a H_bcd] − ... − α′/2 F_[ab|^γ F_|cd]γ = 0 ... this is a Green-Schwarz-like condition D_[a H_bcd] = 3α′/4 F_[ab|^γ F_|cd]γ. ... We also show that the Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation condition follows from the Jacobi identity"

Once the torsion constraint has already placed the Yang–Mills Chern–Simons form inside H (4.24), the component of the Jacobi/Bianchi identity R_[ABCD]=0 that yields D H ∝ F∧F is the standard differential identity d(CS(A))∼F∧F, rewritten in mega-space language. It is a consistency check of the algebra that already included f_μνρ and A, not an independent derivation of anomaly cancellation. Only the F-sector appears; the paper itself notes the missing tr(R∧R). Mild self-definitional dressing of a known identity, not full tautology of the central framework.

full rationale

The paper constructs an enlarged Poláček–Siegel current algebra, imposes torsion constraints and a physical section, and recovers the standard heterotic spin connection, H with Yang–Mills Chern–Simons, and the Bianchi D_{[a}H_{bcd]}∝F∧F. That is ordinary geometric theory-building, not a tautology: the Jacobi identity for ▷_M genuinely forces the Bianchi identity (4.12)–(4.13), and the F∧F piece tracks the structure constants put into the algebra. The embedding of connections into the mega-vielbein is largely by the chosen parametrization (4.3)–(4.4) (citing Poláček–Siegel and the authors’ prior gauged-DFT work), and the undetermined symmetric part of ω plus the dilaton are fixed by hand to match ordinary heterotic supergravity (4.25), (4.36). Those are mild input choices that steer the output toward the known answer, not self-definitional loops or fitted “predictions.” The abstract’s claim that full Green–Schwarz anomaly cancellation follows is an overclaim relative to the missing tr(R∧R) term (explicitly admitted in §5), but overclaim is a correctness issue, not circularity. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own input in the sense of the rubric. Score 2 for the ansatz/section/dilaton steering only.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The load-bearing content rests on standard current-algebra and DFT toolkit plus several theory choices: nondegenerate dual Lorentz generators for Jacobi closure, a specific mega-vielbein gauge packing ω and A, torsion-free constraints, physical section, an assumed symmetric spin connection, and post-section dilaton. No empirical free parameters. Invented/named entities are mostly organizational (mega-space packing, nachos basis) rather than new physical particles.

axioms (7)

domain assumption Nondegenerate doubled Poincaré algebra with dual Lorentz generators Σ_MN is required so that Jacobi identities close in the presence of the PM,PN Schwinger term (eqs. 2.18–2.19, extended in 3.5).
Standard in Poláček-Siegel / nondegenerate current-algebra approaches; adopted without independent derivation here.
domain assumption Physical section condition: fields depend only on ordinary spacetime coordinates, ∂_μ = ∂̃_m = 0 (stated in §4.3).
Solves the strong section condition but discards genuinely doubled/mega dependence; needed to match ordinary heterotic supergravity.
domain assumption Torsion constraints T_ABC = 0 (and component Tabc = Tabγ = Tabc̃ = 0) fix the antisymmetric connections to H, c, F (4.19)–(4.24).
Parallel to ordinary Riemannian geometry and Poláček-Siegel; imposed rather than derived from dynamics.
ad hoc to paper Symmetric part of ω_ab^c equals the ordinary torsion-free expression ½(c_ab^c + c^c_(ab)) (4.25).
Not fixed by totally antisymmetric torsion; assumed by analogy with non-doubled GR to complete the curvature.
ad hoc to paper Dilaton kinetic and measure terms are added after reduction using Siegel’s e^{-2d}=√-g e^{-2φ} treatment, not from mega-space ∇d=0 (footnote §4.3).
Authors acknowledge this differs from standard DFT connection compatibility.
domain assumption O(D+n,D) invariant metric and structure constants f_μνρ for the gauge algebra, with n arbitrary (n=16 for conventional heterotic).
Standard heterotic/gauged-DFT setup.
domain assumption Zero-mode/particle limit drops Schwinger terms and Σ generators when reading off [∇_A,∇_B] curvature (below 4.18).
Needed to match field-theory commutators; stringy extras are set aside by hand.

invented entities (2)

Heterotic mega-space current algebra / nachos basis ▷_M = (S, P, Σ) including gauge P_μ no independent evidence
purpose: Single affine algebra housing Lorentz, doubled translations, dual Lorentz partners, and non-Abelian gauge currents so connections sit in one generalized vielbein.
Extension of Poláček-Siegel nachos and gauged-DFT currents; organizational geometric entity, not a new particle.
Mega-vielbein E_A^M packing ω_AMN, E_AM, A_mμ and r_ABCD (4.3)–(4.4) no independent evidence
purpose: Geometrically embed spin connection and gauge field as components of one orthogonal frame on mega-space.
Ansatz choice generalizing [25,32]; r_ABCD is residual ambiguity used to adjust curvature symmetry.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 22006 in / 4303 out tokens · 80422 ms · 2026-07-31T21:14:07.594126+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

We study the Lorentz and gauge connections in heterotic string theories within a framework of manifest T-duality. A central motivation is the Bergshoeff--de Roo (BdR) type parallelism between the torsionful Lorentz and Yang-Mills connections in heterotic $\alpha'$-corrections. We formulate worldsheet current algebras in a mega-space that incorporates the Lorentz and gauge sectors simultaneously. By generalizing the Pol\'a\v{c}ek-Siegel scheme, we evaluate the commutators of the extended generators and determine the generalized connections. We show that this mega-space current algebra geometrically embeds the heterotic Chern--Simons structures into the generalized vielbeins and curvatures. We also show that the Green-Schwarz anomaly cancellation condition follows from the Jacobi identity for the algebra of stringy covariant derivatives, the ``nachos'' operators $\triangleright_{\mathcal{M}}$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

[1]

Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,

M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,” Phys. Lett. B149(1984), 117-122

1984
[2]

Supersymmetric Chern-simons Terms in Ten-dimensions,

E. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, “Supersymmetric Chern-simons Terms in Ten-dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B218(1989), 210-215

1989
[3]

The Quartic Effective Action of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry,

E. A. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, “The Quartic Effective Action of the Heterotic String and Supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B328(1989), 439-468

1989
[4]

O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes,

A. Sen, “O(d) x O(d) symmetry of the space of cosmological solutions in string theory, scale factor duality and two-dimensional black holes,” Phys. Lett. B271(1991), 295-300

1991
[5]

Duality Symmetric Formulation of String World Sheet Dynamics,

A. A. Tseytlin, “Duality Symmetric Formulation of String World Sheet Dynamics,” Phys. Lett. B242(1990), 163-174

1990
[6]

Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity,

W. Siegel, “Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) 5453 [hep-th/9302036]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[7]

Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings,

W. Siegel, “Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings,” Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 2826 [hep-th/9305073]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[8]

Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings,

W. Siegel, “Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings,” [arXiv:hep-th/9308133]

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[9]

Double Field Theory,

C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double Field Theory,” JHEP0909(2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]]; “The gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets,” JHEP0909, 090 (2009) [arXiv:0908.1792 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[10]

Doubledα ′-geometry,

O. Hohm, W. Siegel and B. Zwiebach, “Doubledα ′-geometry,” JHEP02(2014), 065 [arXiv:1306.2970 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[11]

Green-Schwarz mechanism andα ′-deformed Courant brack- ets,

O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, “Green-Schwarz mechanism andα ′-deformed Courant brack- ets,” JHEP01(2015), 012 [arXiv:1407.0708 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[12]

Double field theory at orderα ′,

O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, “Double field theory at orderα ′,” JHEP11(2014), 075 [arXiv:1407.3803 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[13]

Duality Invariance and Higher Derivatives,

C. Eloy, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben, “Duality Invariance and Higher Derivatives,” Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.12, 126018 [arXiv:2004.13140 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[14]

All-order generalized Green-Schwarz transformations,

A. Gitsis and F. Hassler, “All-order generalized Green-Schwarz transformations,” [arXiv:2511.09615 [hep-th]]. 20

arXiv
[15]

α ′-Bootstrap,

A. Gitsis, F. Hassler and L. Scala, “α ′-Bootstrap,” [arXiv:2607.05487 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

The generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identifica- tion,

W. H. Baron, E. Lescano and D. Marqu´ es, “The generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identifica- tion,” JHEP11(2018), 160 [arXiv:1810.01427 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[17]

The generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identification. Part II,

W. Baron and D. Marques, “The generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identification. Part II,” JHEP01(2021), 171 [arXiv:2009.07291 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021
[18]

Unraveling the generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identification,

A. Gitsis and F. Hassler, “Unraveling the generalized Bergshoeff-de Roo identification,” JHEP06(2025), 048 [arXiv:2412.17900 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[19]

Consistent truncations and dualities,

D. Butter, F. Hassler, C. N. Pope and H. Zhang, “Consistent truncations and dualities,” JHEP04(2023), 007 [arXiv:2211.13241 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[20]

Generalised geometry for string corrections,

A. Coimbra, R. Minasian, H. Triendl and D. Waldram, “Generalised geometry for string corrections,” JHEP11(2014), 160 [arXiv:1407.7542 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[21]

Double Field Theory Formulation of Heterotic Strings,

O. Hohm and S. K. Kwak, “Double Field Theory Formulation of Heterotic Strings,” JHEP 06(2011), 096 [arXiv:1103.2136 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[22]

Gauged Double Field Theory,

M. Grana and D. Marques, “Gauged Double Field Theory,” JHEP04(2012), 020 [arXiv:1201.2924 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[23]

Gauged Extended Field Theory and Generalised Cartan Geometry,

F. Hassler, D. Osten and A. Swash, “Gauged Extended Field Theory and Generalised Cartan Geometry,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026), 066017 [arXiv:2509.04595 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[24]

Hierarchy of curvatures in exceptional geometry,

F. Hassler and Y. Sakatani, “Hierarchy of curvatures in exceptional geometry,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.10, 106002 [arXiv:2311.12095 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[25]

Natural curvature for manifest T-duality,

M. Pol´ aˇ cek and W. Siegel, “Natural curvature for manifest T-duality,” JHEP01(2014), 026 [arXiv:1308.6350 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[26]

Current algebras, generalised fluxes and non-geometry,

D. Osten, “Current algebras, generalised fluxes and non-geometry,” J. Phys. A53(2020) no.26, 265402 [arXiv:1910.00029 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[27]

Current Algebra and Generalised Cartan Geometry,

F. Hassler, O. Hulik and D. Osten, “Current Algebra and Generalised Cartan Geometry,” [arXiv:2409.00176 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[28]

Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model,

D. Osten, “Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model,” Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) no.10, 106021 [arXiv:2312.10149 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[29]

Classical AdS superstring mechanics,

M. Hatsuda and K. Kamimura, “Classical AdS superstring mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B611 (2001), 77-92 [arXiv:hep-th/0106202 [hep-th]]. 21

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[30]

Superspace with manifest T-duality from type II superstring,

M. Hatsuda, K. Kamimura and W. Siegel, “Superspace with manifest T-duality from type II superstring,” JHEP06, 039 (2014) [arXiv:1403.3887 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[31]

Type II chiral affine Lie algebras and string actions in doubled space,

M. Hatsuda, K. Kamimura and W. Siegel, “Type II chiral affine Lie algebras and string actions in doubled space,” JHEP09(2015), 113 [arXiv:1507.03061 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[32]

Gauged double field theory, current algebras and heterotic sigma models,

M. Hatsuda, H. Mori, S. Sasaki and M. Yata, “Gauged double field theory, current algebras and heterotic sigma models,” JHEP05(2023), 220 [arXiv:2212.06476 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[33]

Siegel, “Fields,” [arXiv:hep-th/9912205 [hep-th]]

W. Siegel, “Fields,” [arXiv:hep-th/9912205 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[34]

Stringy differential geometry, beyond Riemann,

I. Jeon, K. Lee and J. H. Park, “Stringy differential geometry, beyond Riemann,” Phys. Rev. D84(2011), 044022 [arXiv:1105.6294 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[35]

On the Riemann Tensor in Double Field Theory,

O. Hohm and B. Zwiebach, “On the Riemann Tensor in Double Field Theory,” JHEP05 (2012), 126 [arXiv:1112.5296 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[36]

Extended doubled structures of algebroids for gauged double field theory,

H. Mori and S. Sasaki, “Extended doubled structures of algebroids for gauged double field theory,” JHEP06(2024), 096 [arXiv:2402.03895 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[37]

Heteroticα ′ corrections in Double Field The- ory,

O. A. Bedoya, D. Marques and C. Nunez, “Heteroticα ′ corrections in Double Field The- ory,” JHEP12(2014), 074 [arXiv:1407.0365 [hep-th]]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[38]

Duality covariant curvatures for the heterotic string,

F. Hassler, D. Osten and Y. Sakatani, “Duality covariant curvatures for the heterotic string,” JHEP09(2025), 031 [arXiv:2412.17893 [hep-th]]. 22

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025