Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 103 references

Variational Formulation of a Hybrid Kinetic and Gyrokinetic Model for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single variational Lagrangian couples fully kinetic ions to gyrokinetic electrons and recovers high-frequency solar-wind waves at reduced cost.

desk verdict Solid variational hybrid derivation with honest electrostatic benchmarks, but the tests only exercise the drift-kinetic electron limit, not the full GK-electron system advertised. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28305 v1 pith:ND66TBIM submitted 2026-07-30 physics.plasm-ph

F. N. deOliveira-Lopes , S. C. Thatikonda , D. Told , A. Mustonen , K. Pommois , K. Hagiwara , F. Jenko , R. Grauer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords hybridkinetic-gyrokineticmodelvariationalformulationLie-transformperturbationsolarwindturbulenceionBernsteinwavesLandaudampinggyrokineticelectronsfullykineticions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a hybrid plasma model in which ions keep their full kinetic description while electrons are reduced to gyrokinetic form, both derived from the same Lie-transform Hamiltonian machinery and closed by varying one action. The goal is a cheaper way to reach ion-scale and selected electron-kinetic physics in solar-wind turbulence without solving the full six-dimensional electron Vlasov equation. Linear electrostatic branches—ion acoustic waves, ion Bernstein waves, and modes with frequency well above the ion cyclotron frequency—match external fully kinetic and hybrid dispersion solvers once a Maxwellian Laplacian term is kept in Poisson’s equation. A nonlinear electrostatic Landau-damping test in the companion solver shows the expected linear decay, nonlinear rebound, and bounded total-energy error. If the ordering holds, the model supplies a practical bridge between fluid/hybrid codes and full kinetics for dissipation studies.

What carries the argument

The common action on a heterogeneous manifold (full phase space for ions, gyrocenter coordinates for electrons) whose variation yields both particle characteristics and the coupled Poisson/Ampère equations, after higher-order Lie transforms that eliminate gyroangle dependence under a shared slab ordering.

What would settle it

An electromagnetic linear dispersion comparison, or a nonlinear electromagnetic turbulence run, in which the hybrid’s ion Bernstein / lower-hybrid / kinetic-Alfvén branches and energy cascade diverge systematically from a fully kinetic reference at the same parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A consistently ordered variational hybrid of fully kinetic ions and gyrokinetic electrons, closed by field equations obtained from a single action on a heterogeneous manifold, reproduces the electrostatic linear spectrum (including high-frequency and Bernstein branches) of more expensive kinetic models and captures nonlinear Landau damping with controlled energy error.

Load-bearing premise

The ordering that treats electrons as gyrokinetic (dropping the slow bracket term, assuming a slab background field, and using long-wavelength reductions in the field equations) must still keep the electron-kinetic channels that matter for solar-wind dissipation; if it fails at the wavenumbers of interest the recovered branches and the cost saving collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ion-scale solar-wind turbulence can be simulated with kinetic electron channels retained at far lower cost than full six-dimensional electron kinetics.
  • Ion acoustic, ion Bernstein, and selected ω ≫ Ω_ci modes become available inside a reduced hybrid framework once the Maxwellian Laplacian is kept.
  • The same variational closure supplies a route to electromagnetic extensions (parallel Ampère already derived) and to structure-preserving nonlinear runs.
  • Bounded energy error in the nonlinear Landau-damping benchmark supports long-time hybrid turbulence studies of collisionless heating.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the electromagnetic extension preserves the same linear agreement, the model becomes a natural test-bed for whether ion Bernstein / kinetic-Alfvén coupling can account for observed ion heating without full electron kinetics.
  • The heterogeneous-manifold variational structure may later admit metriplectic or contact-geometric entropy terms, giving a controlled path from reversible hybrid dynamics to irreversible dissipation.
  • Failure of the slab/long-wavelength field reductions at high k_∥ would show up first as a mismatch in the quasi-parallel Langmuir-like limit, giving a sharp diagnostic for the ordering’s breakdown.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a hybrid model with fully kinetic ions and gyrokinetic electrons from a common Lagrangian/Lie-transform framework, closes the system variationally to obtain Poisson and parallel Ampère equations on a heterogeneous manifold, and presents electrostatic linear wave comparisons (IAW, IBW, and ω≫Ω_ci) plus a nonlinear Landau-damping test in the ssV code. The stated goal is a computationally cheaper description of high-frequency and electron-kinetic channels relevant to solar-wind turbulence, with improved conservation properties relative to pull-back/push-forward hybrids.

Significance. A consistently variational FK-ion/GK-electron hybrid with shared formalism would be a useful intermediate between fluid-electron hybrids and full kinetics for space and laboratory plasmas, especially if it retains selected electron-kinetic channels while extending the accessible frequency range. Strengths include external benchmarks against DSHARK and HYDROS (not self-fits), analytic IAW/IBW/high-frequency limits, and a classical nonlinear Landau test with bounded energy error across resolutions. Those results are valuable for the drift-kinetic-electron electrostatic reduction that is actually exercised. The significance of the full gyrokinetic-electron, electromagnetic claim remains conditional on closing the gap between the §§II–IV derivation and the reported tests.

major comments (4)
  1. [§§II–VI, Appendix A; Abstract] Central validation gap: §§II–IV derive gyrokinetic electrons (Lie transform, gyroaverages ⟨ψ₁⟩, polarization in Poisson Eq. (32)–(34), heterogeneous-manifold closure), but all quantitative evidence uses a further drift-kinetic electrostatic reduction. Appendix A linearizes drift-kinetic electrons; FIDEL is the DK-electron/FK-ion solver; §VI.A states ssV solves “fully kinetic ion physics alongside drift-kinetic electron physics.” Figs. 1–6 and the Landau test therefore do not exercise electron FLR/gyroaveraging, the full §IV polarization structure, or EM variational coupling. Either add GK-electron linear/nonlinear tests at the reported kρ_i, or reframe abstract/intro/conclusion to state that validated results are for the DK-electron electrostatic limit of the hybrid.
  2. [§I roadmap; §VI title/content; Abstract] Framing inconsistency on electromagnetics: the Introduction states that “nonlinear electromagnetic results are discussed in Section 6,” and the abstract emphasizes electromagnetic turbulence, but §VI is titled and content-limited to nonlinear electrostatic Landau damping; perpendicular Ampère is deferred (§IV.B). Correct the roadmap and scope statements so claims match what is derived and shown.
  3. [§II (ordering, {S1,H1}_s=0); §IV; §V.C] Load-bearing ordering: §II sets {S₁,H₁}_s = 0 from species field-strength differences, adopts slab B₀, and uses long-wavelength/drift-kinetic reductions in the field equations. The recovery of IBW and ω≫Ω_ci branches (including the Maxwellian-Laplacian role in §V.C) is tied to these choices. State explicitly for which (k_∥,k_⊥,β,T_i/T_e) the dropped slow bracket and long-wavelength polarization remain consistent, and where the model reverts to a DK hybrid rather than retaining the claimed GK-electron channels for solar-wind dissipation.
  4. [§II; §V.B–C; Ref. [38]] Key steps of the gyrokinetic reduction, generating function, and several dispersion derivations are deferred to the thesis [38] (“details elsewhere”). For a journal derivation paper, the cohomological equation solution, the modified Poisson bracket used in the electron Vlasov equation, and the analytic IBW/high-frequency dispersion steps that distinguish this model from prior GKe/FKi work should be self-contained at the level needed to reproduce Eqs. (20)–(25) and (32)–(37).
minor comments (6)
  1. [Title/headers] Duplicate/running title artifact: page headers alternate “Variational Formulation of Reduced Kinetic Plasma” with the full title; clean for production.
  2. [§V.C; front matter] Typographical issues: “o-if-magnitude” (§V.C); “in situ” spacing; arXiv date “31 July 2026” / “30 Jul 2026” looks like a placeholder.
  3. [Figs. 1–6] Figure captions should state plasma parameters (T_i/T_e, β, mass ratio, kρ_i range) used in FIDEL/DSHARK/HYDROS comparisons so the agreement is reproducible from the text alone.
  4. [§V.B] HYDROS is omitted from the IBW comparison due to “convergence issues” with little detail; a short note on the failed root or parameter corner would help readers judge the comparison set.
  5. [§§II–IV] Notation: ε_δ vs ε_⊥, Ψ₁ vs ψ₁ vs ⟨φ₁⟩, and B*∥ appear with slight inconsistencies between §II Lagrangian and §IV field equations; a symbol table would help.
  6. [§I] The metriplectic/contact-geometry remarks in the Introduction are not used later; either connect them to the variational closure or shorten to avoid over-promising.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: wave and Landau results are checked against external solvers and standard analytics; self-citations are methodological scaffolding only.

  1. self citation load bearing [§II; repeated ‘details in [38]’ (e.g. after Eq. 8, §III.B, App. A)]
    "A more detailed derivation of the present model can be found in38. ... More details of this modification can be found elsewhere, see 38. ... Details on the derivation for our model can be found elsewhere 38."

    The paper repeatedly outsources the full Lie-transform algebra, ordering choices (including dropping {S1,H1}_s), and linearized dispersion construction to the first author’s thesis [38] rather than closing them in-text. That is author-overlapping scaffolding for the derivation, not an independent external proof of the hybrid system. It is not load-bearing for the numerical claims: those are still checked against DSHARK/HYDROS and standard Landau benchmarks, so this raises the score only to the minor (≈2) level.

full rationale

The claimed chain is Lagrangian/Lie-transform reduction → hybrid Vlasov + variational field equations → linear electrostatic branches and a nonlinear Landau test. None of the reported frequencies, damping rates, or energy curves is obtained by fitting the target quantity or by defining the observable in terms of itself. IAW/IBW/high-frequency comparisons are to DSHARK, HYDROS, and textbook analytic limits; the nonlinear run uses the classical α=0.5, k=0.5 Landau initial condition and reports γ and bounded energy error against the literature. Self-citations ([38] thesis for full GK algebra, FIDEL/ssV implementation papers with author overlap) supply derivation detail and numerics but do not force the dispersion roots or the Landau rates by construction. The separate correctness concern that published benchmarks exercise a drift-kinetic-electron reduction rather than the full GK-electron system of §§II–IV is an overclaim/validity issue, not circularity. Score 2 only for non-load-bearing self-reference burden.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Hamiltonian/Lie-transform gyrokinetics plus several domain orderings and modeling choices (slab B0, heterogeneous manifold for fields, dropped slow bracket, long-wavelength polarization, electrostatic reduction for the reported tests). No new physical particles or forces are postulated; free parameters are the usual asymptotic bookkeeping symbols and numerical resolutions, not data-fitted constants driving the wave matches.

free parameters (3)
  • ε_δ, ε_⊥ ordering parameters
    Small parameters that define which electromagnetic and FLR terms are kept or dropped in the Lie transforms and field equations; chosen by asymptotic modeling, not fitted to solar-wind spectra.
  • Numerical resolutions and Δt in ssV Landau test = Δt=0.01; (32,64)/(32,128)/(32,256)
    Grid sizes (Nx,Nv) and Δt=0.01 are chosen for the nonlinear benchmark; they affect observed filamentation sharpness but are not fitted physical constants.
  • Landau initial perturbation (α, k) = α=0.5, k=0.5
    Standard benchmark amplitudes α=0.5, k=0.5; conventional test settings rather than solar-wind fits.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Lie-transform gyrokinetic reduction with magnetic-moment conservation under stated orderings is valid for the electron species.
    §II builds on Littlejohn/Sugama/Tronko-style GK; electrons must remain in the GK regime while ions do not.
  • ad hoc to paper The slow Poisson-bracket contribution {S1,H1}_s may be set to zero because of field-strength differences between species.
    Explicit modification in §II that propagates into the final gyrocenter Lagrangian; not universal in all GK derivations.
  • domain assumption Background magnetic field may be taken as slab for solar-wind-relevant linear/nonlinear tests here.
    Stated distinction from curvature-focused literature; used throughout linearization appendix and ssV geometry.
  • domain assumption Electromagnetic fields live on a heterogeneous manifold and couple FK and GK species via pull to physical x with gyroaverages.
    §IV variational construction following cited geometric field-theory works.
  • domain assumption Long-wavelength expansion of gyrokinetic polarization (Maxwellian Laplacian / ρ_th²/λ_D² terms) is adequate for the reported electrostatic branches.
    Enters Poisson §IV and is credited for high-k and high-frequency behavior in §V.
  • standard math Variational stationarity of the hybrid action yields the correct closed field equations with desirable conservation properties.
    Standard calculus of variations / Low-type plasma action ideas applied to the hybrid Lagrangian.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Variational Formulation of a Hybrid Kinetic and Gyrokinetic Model for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ND66TBIM

@misc{pith2026260728305,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Variational Formulation of a Hybrid Kinetic and Gyrokinetic Model for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ND66TBIM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28305}
}
read the original abstract

We present a Lagrangian model that encapsulates fully kinetic ions and gyrokinetic electrons for solar wind electromagnetic turbulence. Using a consistent method, where both electrons and protons are treated with the same mathematical formalism, we derive and implement a model in which high-frequency waves and kinetic electron effects are described in a computationally cost-efficient way. Higher-order Lie-transform perturbation methods applied to Hamiltonian formulation of guiding center motion are used to describe the dynamics of particles and fields. We use a variational approach to derive field equations for closure of the system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28305 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Almost parallel ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Parallel ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5: Perpendicular ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the high frequency wave of Eq.(40)with (cv = 1) and without (cv = 0) the Maxwellian Laplacian, at kρi = 10 for various propagating angles. At small θ (quasi￾parallel propagation), the case without the Maxwellian Lapla￾cian exhibits a spurious blow-up of the frequ…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Time evolution of the electric field energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Relative total energy error versus time for the SLMP5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Phase-space distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Spatially integrated distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Evolution and Role of Solar Wind Turbulence in the Inner Heliosphere. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. 2019

    2019

  2. [1]

    G. K. Batchelor , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , year =

  3. [2]

    Galtier, S and Nazarenko, SV and Newell, AC and Pouquet, A , Title =

  4. [3]

    C. J. Brownell and L. K. Su , title =. AIAA Paper 2004-2335 , year =

    2004

  5. [4]

    C. J. Brownell and L. K. Su , title =. AIAA Paper 2007-1314 , year =

    2007

  6. [5]

    S. C. R. Dennis , title =. Ninth Intl Conf. on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics , publisher =. 1985 , editor =

    1985

  7. [6]

    Hwang and E

    L.-S. Hwang and E. O. Tuck , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , year =

  8. [7]

    M. G. Worster , title =. In Interactive dynamics of convection and solidification , publisher =. 1992 , editor =

    1992

Show all 103 references
  1. [8]

    Koch , title =

    W. Koch , title =. J. Sound Vib. , year =

  2. [9]

    Lee , title =

    J.-J. Lee , title =. J. Fluid Mech. , year =

  3. [10]

    C. M. Linton and D. V. Evans , title =. Phil.\ Trans.\ R. Soc.\ Lond. , year =

  4. [11]

    P. A. Martin , title =. 1980 , journal =

    1980

  5. [12]

    R. S. Rogallo , title =

  6. [13]

    Ursell , title =

    F. Ursell , title =. 1950 , journal =

    1950

  7. [14]

    On the oscillations near and at resonance in open pipes , year =

    L. On the oscillations near and at resonance in open pipes , year =. J. Engng Maths , volume =

  8. [15]

    P. L. Miller , title =. 1991 , address =

    1991

  9. [16]

    and Klein, K.G

    Verscharen, D. and Klein, K.G. and Maruca, B.A. , title =. Living Rev Sol Phys 16, 5 , year =

  10. [17]

    and Carbone, V

    Bruno, R. and Carbone, V. , title =. Turbulence in the Solar Wind , publisher =. 2016 , editor =

    2016

  11. [18]

    Wasserman , title =

    Robert H. Wasserman , title =. Oxford , year =

  12. [19]

    Plasma Science and Technology , abstract =

    Fan, Peifeng and Qin, Hong and Xiao, Jianyuan , title =. Plasma Science and Technology , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/2058-6272/ac18ba , url =

    2021 doi

  13. [20]

    , title =

    Brizard A., Tronko N. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , year =

  14. [21]

    New Journal of Physics , year =

    Daniel Told and Patrick Astfalk and Fabian Mueller and Tessa Cookmayer and Frank Jenko , title =. New Journal of Physics , year =

  15. [22]

    Littlejohn , title =

    Robert G. Littlejohn , title =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , year =

  16. [23]

    Littlejohn, Robert G. , year=. Variational principles of guiding centre motion , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1017/S002237780000060X , number=

    doi

  17. [24]

    Sugama , title =

    H. Sugama , title =. Physics of Plasmas , year =

  18. [25]

    Tronko , A

    N. Tronko , A. Brizard , title =. Physics of Plasmas , year =

  19. [26]

    1971 , publisher =

    The Classical Theory of Fields , author =. 1971 , publisher =

    1971

  20. [27]

    1970 , publisher =

    The Variational Principle of Mechanics , author =. 1970 , publisher =

    1970

  21. [28]

    1989 , publisher =

    Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , author =. 1989 , publisher =

    1989

  22. [29]

    1981 , publisher =

    Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , author =. 1981 , publisher =

    1981

  23. [30]

    and Badman, S.T

    Bale, S.D. and Badman, S.T. and Bonnell, J.W. , title =. Nature , year =

  24. [31]

    and Zank, G

    Zhao, L.-L. and Zank, G. P. and Adhikari, L. and Hu, Q. and Kasper, J. C. and Bale, S. D. and Korreck, K. E. and Case, A. W. and Stevens, M. and Bonnell, J. W. and Dudok de Wit, T. and Goetz, K. and Harvey, P. R. and MacDowall, R. J. and Malaspina, D. M. and Pulupa, M. and Lar...

    2020 doi

  25. [32]

    and Mallet, Alfred and Huang, Jia and Klein, Kristopher G

    Bowen, Trevor A. and Mallet, Alfred and Huang, Jia and Klein, Kristopher G. and Malaspina, David M. and Stevens, Michael and Bale, Stuart D. and Bonnell, J. W. and Case, Anthony W. and Chandran, Benjamin D. G. and Chaston, C. C. and Chen, Christopher H. K. and Dudok de Wit, Th...

    2020

  26. [33]

    Parashar, T. N. and Goldstein, M. L. and Maruca, B. A. and Matthaeus, W. H. and Ruffolo, D. and Bandyopadhyay, R. and Chhiber, R. and Chasapis, A. and Qudsi, R. and Vech, D. and Roberts, D. A. and Bale, S. D. and Bonnell, J. W. and de Wit, T. Dudok and Goetz, K. and Harvey, P....

    2020

  27. [34]

    Bandyopadhyay, Riddhi and Matthaeus, W. H. and Parashar, T. N. and Chhiber, R. and Ruffolo, D. and Goldstein, M. L. and Maruca, B. A. and Chasapis, A. and Qudsi, R. and McComas, D. J. and Christian, E. R. and Szalay, J. R. and Joyce, C. J. and Giacalone, J. and Schwadron, N. A...

    2020

  28. [35]

    Huang, Jia and Kasper, J. C. and Vech, D. and Klein, K. G. and Stevens, M. and Martinović, Mihailo M. and Alterman, B. L. and Ďurovcová, Tereza and Paulson, Kristoff and Maruca, Bennett A. and Qudsi, Ramiz A. and Case, A. W. and Korreck, K. E. and Jian, Lan K. and Velli, Marco...

    2020

  29. [36]

    and Bale, Stuart D

    Dudok de Wit, Thierry and Krasnoselskikh, Vladimir V. and Bale, Stuart D. and Bonnell, John W. and Bowen, Trevor A. and Chen, Christopher H. K. and Froment, Clara and Goetz, Keith and Harvey, Peter R. and Jagarlamudi, Vamsee Krishna and Larosa, Andrea and MacDowall, Robert J. ...

    2020 doi

  30. [37]

    and Klein, Kristopher G

    Martinović, Mihailo M. and Klein, Kristopher G. and Kasper, Justin C. and Case, Anthony W. and Korreck, Kelly E. and Larson, Davin and Livi, Roberto and Stevens, Michael and Whittlesey, Phyllis and Chandran, Benjamin D. G. and Alterman, Ben L. and Huang, Jia and Chen, Christop...

    2020

  31. [39]

    Universality of Solar-Wind Turbulent Spectrum from MHD to Electron Scales , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.165003 , url =

    2009 doi

  32. [40]

    C. P. Escoubetet al. , title =. Space Sci. Rev. , year =

  33. [41]

    Smith and Philip A

    Charles W. Smith and Philip A. Isenberg and William H. Matthaeus and John D. Richardson , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. doi:10.1086/498671 , url =

    doi

  34. [42]

    2015 , publisher =

    Basic of Plasma Astrophysics , author =. 2015 , publisher =

    2015

  35. [43]

    , author =

    Space Physics, An Introduction to Plasmas and Particles in the Heliosphere and Magnetosphere. , author =. 2001 , number =

    2001

  36. [44]

    1994 , number =

    Plasma Astrophysics , author =. 1994 , number =

    1994

  37. [45]

    2016 , number =

    Turbulence in the Solar Wind , author =. 2016 , number =

    2016

  38. [46]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    He, Jiansen and Duan, Die and Wang, Tieyan and Zhu, Xingyu and Li, Wenya and Verscharen, Daniel and Wang, Xin and Tu, Chuanyi and Khotyaintsev, Yuri and Le, Guan and Burch, Jim , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2a79 , url =

    doi

  39. [47]

    and Klein, K.G

    Chen, C.H.K. and Klein, K.G. and Howes, G.G. , title =

  40. [48]

    Howes, G. G. and Cowley, S. C. and Dorland, W. and Hammett, G. W. and Quataert, E. and Schekochihin, A. A. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:0511812 , file =

  41. [49]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , keywords =

    Tronko, Natalia and Chandre, Cristel , doi =. Journal of Plasma Physics , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1709.05222 , file =

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    N Tronko and A Bottino and C Chandre and E Sonnendrücker and S Brunner and E Lanti and N Ohana and L Villard , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ab4109 , url =

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    Energetically consistent model reduction for metriplectic systems , journal =

    Anthony Gruber and Max Gunzburger and Lili Ju and Zhu Wang , keywords =. Energetically consistent model reduction for metriplectic systems , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115709 , url =

    2023

  44. [52]

    2003 , publisher =

    An Introduction to Plasma Astrophysics and Magnetohydrodynamics , author =. 2003 , publisher =

    2003

  45. [53]

    2019 , publisher =

    Magnetohydrodynamics of Laboratory and Astrophysical Plasmas , author =. 2019 , publisher =

    2019

  46. [54]

    Vincent David and S. k_ ^. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2fe6 , url =

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    1985 , publisher =

    Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics , author =. 1985 , publisher =

    1985

  48. [56]

    Morini , title =

    G.L. Morini , title =. 2008 , month =. doi:, url =

    2008

  49. [57]

    Collisional Relaxation of Fine Velocity Structures in Plasmas , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.145001 , url =

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    and Saur, J

    Schreiner, A. and Saur, J. , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/133 , url =

    doi

  51. [59]

    2012 , publisher=

    Physical Kinetics , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  52. [60]

    , title =

    Olson,Craig L. , title =. The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1972 , doi =

    1972

  53. [61]

    Martinovi

    Mihailo M. Martinovi. Radial Evolution of Stochastic Heating in Low-beta Solar Wind , journal =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab23f4 , url =

    doi

  54. [62]

    R. Gerwin. Theory of collisional heating of plasma by magnetic pumping. Physica. 1966. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(66)90133-9

    1966 doi

  55. [63]

    V.I. Arnold. Contact geometry: The geometrical method of Gibbs’s thermodynamics. Proc. Gibbs Symp. 1990

    1990

  56. [64]

    Low, F. E. and Chandrasekhar, S. , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , volume =. 1958 , doi =

    1958

  57. [65]

    Marsch, E. and C. K. Goertz and K. Richter , title =. J. Geophys. Res. , volume =

  58. [66]

    Kohl, J. L. and Noci, G. and Antonucci, E. and Tondello, G. and Huber, M. C. E. and Cranmer, S. R. and Strachan, L. and Panasyuk, A. V and Gardner, L. D. and Romoli, M. and Fineschi, S. and Dobrzycka, D. and Raymond, J. C. and Nicolosi, P. and Siegmund, O. H. W. and Spadaro, D...

    1998

  59. [67]

    2018 , publisher=

    Global Formulations of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics on Manifolds , author=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  60. [68]

    Gaisbauer , title =

    F. Gaisbauer , title =. 2018 , address =

    2018

  61. [69]

    Field theory and weak Euler-Lagrange equation for classical particle-field systems , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.043102 , url =

    2014 doi

  62. [70]

    Darwin Approximation to Maxwell's Equations

    Fang, Nengsheng and Liao, Caixiu and Ying, Lung-An. Darwin Approximation to Maxwell's Equations. Computational Science -- ICCS 2009. 2009

    2009

  63. [71]

    Astfalk P, Görler T and Jenko F , title =. J. Geophys. Res , volume =

  64. [72]

    New Journal of Physics , abstract =

    Told, D and Cookmeyer, J and Astfalk, P and Jenko, F , title =. New Journal of Physics , abstract =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/075001 , url =

    2016 doi

  65. [73]

    Possible coexistence of kinetic Alfven and ion Bernstein modes in sub-ion scale compressive turbulence in the solar wind , author =. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043253 , url =

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    2006 , publisher=

    Plasma Astrophysics, Part I , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  67. [75]

    Ion acoustic waves in the plasma with the power-law q-distribution in nonextensive statistics , journal =

    Liu Liyan and Du Jiulin , keywords =. Ion acoustic waves in the plasma with the power-law q-distribution in nonextensive statistics , journal =. 2008 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.04.016 , url =

    2008 doi

  68. [76]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume =

    Rehman,Saeed ur and ul Haque,Qamar and Shah,Asif , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  69. [77]

    D. A. G Urnnet and L. A. Frank , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research , volume =

  70. [78]

    Kellogg , title =

    Paul J. Kellogg , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  71. [79]

    Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics , volume =

    Ono,Masayuki , title =. Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    1993

  72. [80]

    , title =

    Podesta, John J. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =

  73. [81]

    , title = "

    Coleman, Paul J., Jr. , title = ". Astrophysical Journal , year =. doi:10.1086/149674 , adsurl =

    doi

  74. [82]

    Cranmer , abstract =

    S.R. Cranmer , abstract =. Coronal holes and the solar wind , editor =. 2002 , booktitle =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-2749(02)80003-8 , url =

    2002 doi

  75. [83]

    and Matthaeus, W

    Oughton, S. and Matthaeus, W. H. and Smith, C. W. and Breech, B. and Isenberg, P. A. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =

  76. [84]

    and Roytershteyn, V

    Karimabadi, H. and Roytershteyn, V. and Vu, H. X. and Omelchenko, Y. A. and Scudder, J. and Daughton, W. and Dimmock, A. and Nykyri, K. and Wan, M. and Sibeck, D. and Tatineni, M. and Majumdar, A. and Loring, B. and Geveci, B. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2014 , month =

    2014

  77. [85]

    and Lautenbach, S

    Allmann-Rahn, F. and Lautenbach, S. and Grauer, R. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029976 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2021JA029976 , note =

    doi

  78. [86]

    and Lu, San and Turner, Drew L

    Liu, Terry Z. and Lu, San and Turner, Drew L. and Gingell, Imogen and Angelopoulos, Vassilis and Zhang, Hui and Artemyev, Anton and Burch, James L. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA027822 , url =. https://a...

    doi

  79. [87]

    , title =

    Hollweg, Joseph V. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA02p00563 , abstract =

    doi

  80. [88]

    Astrophysics and Space Science , number =

    Goldstein, Melvyn L , doi =. Astrophysics and Space Science , number =

  81. [89]

    Viall, N. M. and Borovsky, J. E. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =

  82. [90]

    and Li, Bo and Rogers, Barrett N

    Chandran, Benjamin D.G. and Li, Bo and Rogers, Barrett N. and Quataert, Eliot and Germaschewski, Kai , doi =. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

  83. [91]

    Frank-Kamenetskii, D. A. , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-1896-5_27 , file =

    doi

  84. [92]

    deOliveira-Lopes, F. N. , title =. 2022 , address =

    2022

  85. [93]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Yu Lin and Xueyi Wang and Zhihong Lin and Liu Chen , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/47/4/006 , url =

    2005 doi

  86. [94]

    The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =

    Tanaka, Satoshi and Yoshikawa, Kohji and Minoshima, Takashi and Yoshida, Naoki , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa901f , url =

    2017 doi

  87. [95]

    The Semi-Lagrangian Method for the Numerical Resolution of the Vlasov Equation , journal =

    Eric Sonnendrücker and Jean Roche and Pierre Bertrand and Alain Ghizzo , abstract =. The Semi-Lagrangian Method for the Numerical Resolution of the Vlasov Equation , journal =. 1999 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.6148 , url =

    1999

  88. [96]

    1999 , month =

    Quarteroni, Alfio and Valli, Alberto , title =. 1999 , month =. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198501787.001.0001 , url =

    1999

  89. [97]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    The integration of the Vlasov equation in configuration space , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 1976 , doi =

    1976

  90. [98]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    The semi-Lagrangian method for the numerical resolution of the Vlasov equation , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 1999 , doi =

    1999

  91. [99]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    Conservative numerical schemes for the Vlasov equation , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    2001

  92. [100]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    Conservative semi-Lagrangian schemes for Vlasov equations , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  93. [101]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    An energy-conserving conservative semi-Lagrangian scheme for the Vlasov--Ampère system , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  94. [102]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    Highly accurate monotonicity-preserving Semi-Lagrangian scheme for Vlasov-Poisson simulations , author =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  95. [103]

    and De Oliveira-Lopes, F

    Thatikonda, S. and De Oliveira-Lopes, F. N. and Mustonen, A. and Pommois, K. and Told, D. and Jenko, F. , title =. Computer Physics Communications , volume =. 2025 , doi=

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.