Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 66 references

Pulse Shaping Increases Efficiency in Pulsed Plasma Accelerators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Programmable pulse shaping lets a gas-fed pulsed electromagnetic thruster fire multiple high-current pulses during a single gas injection, lifting specific impulse in air from 840 to 3,177 seconds.

desk verdict Programmable pulse shaping is a real capability and the micro-burst Isp gain is plausible, but the propellant-utilization mechanism needs erosion or plume-composition evidence before it is sold as fact. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.28976 v1 pith:CH5AEKNA submitted 2026-07-31 physics.plasm-ph

Patrick W. Schools , Mammadbaghir Baghirzade , Ryan Heiser , Adrian Woodley , Laxminarayan L. Raja , Thomas C. Underwood This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.75.Di
keywords electricpropulsiongas-fedpulsedplasmathrustermagnetoplasmadynamicpulseshapingmicro-burstoperationspecificimpulsepropellantutilization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the current waveform in a gas-fed pulsed electromagnetic thruster can be turned from a fixed circuit property into an independent control variable. Using solid-state switching modules that shape, time, and burst high-current pulses, the authors show that short, high-current pulses convert stored energy into axial impulse more effectively than longer, lower-current pulses at the same discharge energy. They report that firing up to nine 50-microsecond pulses during a single air injection — a 'micro-burst' — raises specific impulse from 840 to 3,177 seconds (a 278% increase) and thrust efficiency from 0.2% to 3.3%, with no change in accelerator geometry or pulsed-power hardware. The paper thereby claims a new operating space for pulsed electromagnetic thrusters in which peak current and the timescale of energy addition are decoupled, which matters for missions that need high exhaust velocity with limited propellant, including air-breathing electric propulsion in very low Earth orbit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the programmable solid-state switching system: eight integrated power modules, each a parallel array of IGBTs with internal capacitance, configured as four positive-negative pairs and driven by a programmable signal generator over matched fiber-optic lines. Pulse-width-modulation control lets the modules create arbitrary current waveforms, including stepped profiles and bursts of multiple high-current pulses, at up to 200 kHz. This decouples peak current from the energy-addition timescale: a short high-current 'GFPPT-like' pulse and a long low-current 'pulsed-MPD-like' pulse can deliver the same energy with very different impulse. A resistive MHD model with finite-rate

What would settle it

Weigh the copper cathode and stainless-steel anodes before and after thousands of micro-burst firings, or monitor for copper and iron emission lines in the plume while measuring impulse bit per pulse. If late pulses still deliver impulse but the measured electrode mass loss matches the added impulse, or if the plume ion composition shifts from nitrogen/oxygen to electrode material as pulse number increases, the specific-impulse gain is not from improved gas propellant utilization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that programmable solid-state pulse shaping — specifically, high-frequency pulse-width-modulated switching of arrays of IGBTs — removes the conventional tradeoff between high peak current and energy-deposition duration. With these switches, the authors vary discharge delay, pulse width, peak current, waveform shape, pulse count, and interpulse spacing independently. They find three things: discharge delay alone selects whether the plasma accelerates as a magneto-deflagration or a magneto-detonation; at nearly fixed energy, a short ~25 µs, 16 kA discharge produces about 250 µN·s of impulse whereas a 500 µs, ~2 kA discharge producing the same 75–78 J delivers only ~95

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the extra impulse from successive micro-burst pulses comes from newly utilized propellant from the same fixed gas injection, not from re-accelerating already-pushed plasma or from electrode ablation; the paper infers this from the constant injected mass and reports no direct entrained-mass or electrode-erosion measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single gas-fed accelerator can switch electronically among operating modes — short high-current, long low-current, and micro-burst — without hardware changes.
  • Micro-burst operation improves specific impulse and thrust efficiency for a fixed propellant mass bit; in air, Isp rises from 840 to 3,177 s and thrust efficiency from 0.2% to 3.3%.
  • Shorter, higher-current pulses at fixed energy yield larger impulse bits; extending pulse duration to match gas injection alone does not guarantee better performance.
  • Discharge delay relative to gas injection selects the acceleration mode (magneto-deflagration vs magneto-detonation), adding a control dimension for plume structure and momentum coupling.
  • The decoupling of peak current from energy addition timescale enables independent exploration of gas/energy timescale matching, benefiting air-breathing electric propulsion where propellant supply is tightly limited.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the micro-burst improvement is genuine propellant utilization, then adaptive interpulse spacing (longer gaps as propellant depletes) should outperform a uniform 50 µs grid; the paper itself notes uniform spacing may not be optimal.
  • A decisive test would be time-resolved entrained-mass or electrode-erosion measurements; if late-pulse impulse correlates with ablated copper or stainless-steel mass rather than the injected air mass, the Isp gains would overstate gas propellant utilization.
  • The decoupling mechanism likely transfers to other propellants and geometries; the same hardware could map the Isp–efficiency envelope for xenon or molecular mixtures without reconfiguring the accelerator.
  • Real-time feedback from current, voltage, or optical diagnostics could adapt the waveform mid-burst to changing impedance and mass loading, extending the operating envelope further than the open-loop pulses demonstrated here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a programmable solid-state pulsed-power system for a gas-fed pulsed electromagnetic thruster that allows independent control of discharge delay, pulse width, peak current, waveform shape, pulse count, and interpulse spacing. Experiments show that short, high-current pulses produce higher exhaust velocities and impulse bits than longer, lower-current pulses at comparable deposited energy. The main new claim is that applying multiple 50-µs discharges (micro-bursts) during a single fixed gas injection increases specific impulse from 840 s to 3177 s in air, a 278% improvement, and increases thrust efficiency from 0.2% to 3.3%. A resistive MHD model with prescribed current pulses is used to support the mechanism that higher peak currents improve electromagnetic acceleration and shift energy partitioning from Joule heating to Lorentz work. The authors argue that pulse shaping decouples peak current from the energy-addition timescale and expands the operating design space of gas-fed pulsed electromagnetic thrusters.

Significance. If the micro-burst propellant-utilization mechanism is confirmed, the result is significant for air-breathing electric propulsion and for pulsed electromagnetic thrusters generally: it would demonstrate a way to combine high peak current with extended energy deposition without changing accelerator geometry or pulsed-power hardware. The experimental core is a genuine measurement campaign with a calibrated ballistic pendulum, high-speed imaging, and a purpose-built IGBT switching system; the MHD model is a separate mechanism study with prescribed currents and does not fit the measured Isp, which reduces circularity concerns. The central limitation is that the headline Isp and efficiency gains are attributed to improved utilization of the fixed injected gas mass without direct measurement of the accelerated mass or electrode erosion. The paper is therefore interesting and potentially important, but the load-bearing attribution is not yet fully evidenced.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.4, Fig. 15b] The central claim that micro-bursts increase Isp from 840 to 3177 s relies on dividing the measured total impulse by the fixed injected mass bit of 12.86 µg. Section 4.4 states: 'Because the injected mass remained constant, this increase resulted directly from the additional impulse accumulated through successive discharges.' This assumes that all impulse comes from accelerating the injected gas and that no significant electrode ablation adds mass to the exhaust. No electrode mass-loss, plume composition, or direct mass-flux measurement is reported. If later pulses ablate copper cathode or stainless-steel anode material, the expelled mass exceeds 12.86 µg and the Isp and efficiency gains are overestimated. Please provide quantitative bounds on ablation or direct measurements of exhausted mass.
  2. [§4.4, Fig. 15; §4.5, Fig. 16b] The headline values (840→3177 s Isp; 0.2%→3.3% efficiency) are presented without error bars or uncertainty propagation. Section 4.4 states that six independent thrust-pendulum measurements were taken per condition, but no standard deviations, confidence intervals, or calibration uncertainty are reported. Without uncertainty quantification the reader cannot judge whether the 278% increase is statistically robust or whether the T/P decrease in Fig. 15c is significant. Please add error bars and report the propagated uncertainty in Isp and η.
  3. [§2.1, Appendix A] The MHD simulation trend in Fig. 3d relies on the 10 kA case, which was not simulated over its full 250-µs pulse. The text notes that 'the 10 kA case was simulated until its exhaust velocity approached a quasi-steady value, which was then extrapolated over the remainder of the prescribed pulse.' The 10 kA point is then included in the velocity-versus-current trend and in the Lorentz/Joule power-partition comparison. The extrapolation should be clearly marked in the figure and a sensitivity estimate provided, since the low-current end of the trend is what motivates the 'higher peak current improves efficiency' mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (10)] The text says 'π is the circle constant'; this should be 'pi' or 'π is the mathematical constant.' Also consider defining all symbols in Eq. (10) explicitly, especially n_k and σ_k.
  2. [§3.5] The pendulum calibration curve spans 222.6 to 773.97 µN·s, but many measured impulse bits, especially single-pulse values in Fig. 12 and the single-shot Isp=840 s case, may fall near or below the lower calibration point. Please state whether these values are within the calibrated range and describe the low-impulse extrapolation behavior.
  3. [§4.4, Fig. 15] The micro-burst experiments use a 50-µs interpulse gap and 50-µs pulses, meaning the current may not return to zero between pulses. The discussion of 'depleted propellant' would benefit from a plot of the actual current waveform across the nine-pulse train, not just the representative 150-µs-gap traces in Fig. 14c.
  4. [General] There are many references to the group's own earlier work (e.g., Refs. 18, 19, 28, 30, 31, 57, 58, 60). This is not inappropriate, but the reader would benefit from a clearer statement of which elements are new relative to those works, particularly the distinction between the deflagration/detonation mode-control results in §4.2 and the earlier publications.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline Isp/efficiency results are measured, not derived from fitted inputs; the MHD model is a separate mechanism study with prescribed currents.

full rationale

The central claim—micro-bursts raise Isp from 840 to 3177 s and efficiency from 0.2% to 3.3%—is an experimental result. Isp is computed as Ibit/mbit using a pendulum-calibrated impulse bit (calibration range 222.6–773.97 µN·s) and a separately calibrated injected mass bit (12.86 µg from 900-injection pressure-rise measurements). The increase with pulse count follows arithmetically from measured impulse accumulation at fixed injected mass; no parameter is fitted to the Isp value and then renamed a prediction. The MHD model (Section 2.1 and Appendix A) prescribes square current pulses (10–25 kA) and computes exhaust velocity from the governing equations; it is not tuned to match the micro-burst measurements, and the experimental time-of-flight trend is compared qualitatively, not used as a fitting target. Self-citations (refs. 19, 30, 31, 57, 58) supply prior MHD regime classifications and numerical frameworks, but the paper's mode-transition observations rest on direct high-speed imaging and current/voltage traces, and the micro-burst conclusion rests on direct thrust-pendulum measurements. The genuine weakness—electrode ablation or re-acceleration of previously pushed plasma could mean expelled mass is not the injected 12.86 µg—is an unverified physical-interpretation risk, not a derivation that reduces to its own input. No equation, fitted coefficient, or self-citation chain forces the headline result.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental performance claims rest on standard pulsed-power assumptions plus one unverified inference: that later pulses in a burst accelerate previously unused injected gas rather than re-accelerating the same plasma or ablating electrode material. The MHD simulations input prescribed currents and boundary conditions chosen to match earlier experiments, which supports the trend but not an absolute prediction.

free parameters (2)
  • MHD inlet temperature and pressure = Tin = 10,500 K, Pin = 110 Pa
    Prescribed at the thermal-plasma inlet (Appendix A, Eq. 12). The text says these values 'yield agreement with the nominal exhaust velocity, stagnation pressure, and plasma density from experiments,' so they are chosen to match earlier experimental conditions rather than derived.
  • Prescribed current pulse durations for constant I^2*tau scaling = 250, 110, 70, 40 microseconds at 10, 15, 20, 25 kA
    Chosen to keep the integral of I^2(t) approximately constant so the simulation can isolate peak-current effects; a normalization choice, not a fit to the target result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Self-field electromagnetic impulse scales approximately as the integral of I^2, and T/P = Ibit/E is a valid performance metric.
    Used throughout Sections 4.3-4.5 to interpret constant T/P as constant energy-to-impulse conversion; based on standard self-field MPD scaling and cited literature.
  • domain assumption The resistive MHD model with nine-species finite-rate air chemistry and three-temperature energies captures the dominant acceleration physics.
    Appendix A; simulations are used to support the peak-current mechanism. The 10 kA case was not fully simulated and was extrapolated after quasi-steady exhaust velocity was reached.
  • domain assumption The ballistic pendulum and Michelson interferometer calibration accurately convert displacement to impulse bit.
    Section 3.5; calibration is performed with a voice coil, but no uncertainty budget for the calibration curve is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Injected mass bit equals the propellant mass accountable in Isp, and no significant electrode erosion contributes to the measured impulse.
    Required for the Isp and propellant-utilization claims in Sections 4.4 and 4.5; the paper does not measure entrained mass per pulse or electrode mass loss.
  • standard math Standard resistive MHD equations and transport/chemistry data from Mutation++ and LXCat are reliable.
    Appendix A; background simulation framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pulse Shaping Increases Efficiency in Pulsed Plasma Accelerators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CH5AEKNA

@misc{pith2026260728976,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pulse Shaping Increases Efficiency in Pulsed Plasma Accelerators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CH5AEKNA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28976}
}
abstract

The performance of a gas-fed pulsed electromagnetic thruster is governed by the ability to deposit electrical energy while propellant is available for acceleration. Current pulsed-power systems require tradeoffs between high-current discharges that produce high exhaust velocities and longer pulses that overlap the energy deposition with more of the gas injection. This limited control restricts the specific impulse and mass utilization of these thrusters. This work introduces programmable pulse shaping as a method to increase control over energy deposition and expand the accessible operating space. We use solid-state integrated power modules to vary the discharge delay, pulse width, peak current, and the shape of the current waveform as propellant is injected. Experiments varying pulse widths from 30 to 500 $\mu$s and peak currents from 3 kA to 16 kA show that short, high-current pulses produce higher exhaust velocities and greater impulse bits than longer, lower-current pulses at comparable discharge energy. The switches also enable multiple discharges of arbitrary positioning and duration during a single gas injection. This micro-burst operation is shown to increase specific impulse in air by 278\% from 840 to 3177 s through improved propellant utilization. This same pulse shaping ability is found to increase thrust efficiency from 0.2\% in single-shot operation to 3.3\% in micro-burst operation while operating with air.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Acta Astronautica159, 213–227 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.058

    Lev, D., Myers, R.M., Lemmer, K.M., Kolbeck, J., Koizumi, H., Polzin, K.: The technological and commercial expansion of electric propulsion. Acta Astronautica159, 213–227 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.058

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.058 2019

  2. [2]

    Space Science Reviews 217, 90 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-021-00861-4

    Benkhoff, J., Murakami, G., Baumjohann, W., Besse, S., Bunce, E., Casale, M., Cremosese, G., Glass- meier, K.-H., Hayakawa, H., Heyner, D., Hiesinger, H., Huovelin, J., Hussmann, H., Iafolla, V., Iess, L., Kasaba, Y., Kobayashi, M., Milillo, A., Mitrofanov, I.G., Montagnon, E., Novara, M., Orsini, S., Quemerais, E., Reininghaus, U., Saito, Y., Santoli, F....

    2021

  3. [3]

    In: 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit

    Johnson, L., Jones, J., Kos, L., Trausch, A., Farris, R., Woodcock, G.: Benefits of nuclear electric propulsion to outer planets exploration. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, V A (2002). https://doi.org/10. 2514/6.2002-3548

    2002

  4. [4]

    Journal of Electric Propulsion3(1), 34 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s44205-024-00095-w

    Woodley, A., Horstman, E., Keidar, M., Underwood, T.C.: Requirements for air-breathing electric propulsion in low-altitude orbits. Journal of Electric Propulsion3(1), 34 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s44205-024-00095-w

    2024

  5. [5]

    Journal of Electric Propulsion1(1), 12 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-022-00009-8

    Crandall, P., Wirz, R.E.: Air-breathing electric propulsion: mission characterization and design analysis. Journal of Electric Propulsion1(1), 12 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44205-022-00009-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s44205-022-00009-8 2022

  6. [6]

    Physics of Plasmas19(7), 073512 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4737114

    Chabert, P., Arancibia Monreal, J., Bredin, J., Popelier, L., Aanesland, A.: Global model of a gridded- ion thruster powered by a radiofrequency inductive coil. Physics of Plasmas19(7), 073512 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4737114

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4737114 2012

  7. [7]

    Journal of Applied Physics134(15), 150901 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0153862

    Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., Garrigues, L.: Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms. Journal of Applied Physics134(15), 150901 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0153862

    2023

  8. [8]

    PhD thesis, University of California Los Angeles (2024)

    Crandall, P.: Miniature Rf Gridded Ion Thruster for Air-Breathing and Alternative Propellants. PhD thesis, University of California Los Angeles (2024)

    2024

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Journal of Applied Physics130(5) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048283

    Marchioni, F., Cappelli, M.A.: Extended channel Hall thruster for air-breathing electric propulsion. Journal of Applied Physics130(5) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048283

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    In: 15th International Electric Propulsion Conference

    Burton, R.L., Clark, K.E., Jahn, R.G.: Thrust and efficiency of a self-field MPD thruster. In: 15th International Electric Propulsion Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Las Vegas, Nevada (1981). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1981-684

    1981 doi

  3. [11]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power17, 967–976 (2001) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5857

    Choueiri, E., Ziemer, J.: Quasi-steady magnetoplasmadynamic thruster performance database. Journal of Propulsion and Power17, 967–976 (2001) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5857

    2001 doi

  4. [12]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power14(5), 754–763 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.2514/2.5338

    Krulle, G., Auweter-Kurtz, M., Sasoh, A.: Technology and Application Aspects of Applied Field Magnetoplasmadynamic Propulsion. Journal of Propulsion and Power14(5), 754–763 (1998) https: //doi.org/10.2514/2.5338

    1998 doi

  5. [13]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power14(5), 744–753 (1998) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5337

    Choueiri, E.: Scaling of Thrust in Self-Field Magnetoplasmadynamic Thrusters. Journal of Propulsion and Power14(5), 744–753 (1998) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5337

    1998 doi

  6. [15]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power9(3), 361–368 (1993) https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23630

    Gallimore, A.D., Kelly, A.J., Jahn, R.G.: Anode power deposition in magnetoplasmadynamic thrusters. Journal of Propulsion and Power9(3), 361–368 (1993) https://doi.org/10.2514/3.23630

    1993 doi

  7. [16]

    Physics of Plasmas11(10), 4761–4770 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1786593

    Zuin, M., Cavazzana, R., Martines, E., Serianni, G., Antoni, V., Bagatin, M., Andrenucci, M., Paganucci, F., Rossetti, P.: Critical regimes and magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in a magneto-plasma-dynamic thruster. Physics of Plasmas11(10), 4761–4770 (2004) https://doi.org/10...

    2004 doi

  8. [17]

    PhD thesis, Princeton University (June 2001)

    Ziemer, J.K.: Performance scaling of gas-fed pulsed plasma thrusters. PhD thesis, Princeton University (June 2001)

    2001

  9. [19]

    Journal of Applied Physics138, 063303 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0273140

    Woodley, A., Horstman, E., Underwood, T.C.: Magnetohydrodynamic operating regimes of pulsed plasma accelerators for efficient propellant utilization. Journal of Applied Physics138, 063303 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0273140

    2025 doi

  10. [20]

    Final Report F49620-98-1-0119, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (December 2000)

    Choueiri, E.Y.: Gas-fed pulsed plasma thrusters: Fundamentals, characteristics and scaling laws. Final Report F49620-98-1-0119, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (December 2000)

    2000

  11. [21]

    Technical report, Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (2000)

    Ziemer, J.K.: A review of gas-fed pulsed plasma thruster research over the last half-century. Technical report, Electric Propulsion and Plasma Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (2000)

    2000

  12. [22]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power16(5), 880–886 (2000) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5655

    Toki, K., Shimizu, Y., Kuriki, K.: On-orbit demonstration of a pulsed self-field magnetoplasmadynamic thruster system. Journal of Propulsion and Power16(5), 880–886 (2000) https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5655

    2000 doi

  13. [23]

    In: 32nd International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2011-340 (2011)

    Molina-Cabrera P, Herdrich G, Lau M, Fausolas S, Schoenherr T, Komurasaki K: Pulsed Plasma Thrusters: a worldwide review and long yearned classification. In: 32nd International Electric Propulsion Conference, IEPC-2011-340 (2011)

    2011

  14. [24]

    Journal of Applied Physics96, 5420–5428 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1805726

    Keidar, M., Boyd, I.D., Beilis, I.I.: Ionization and ablation phenomena in an ablative plasma accelerator. Journal of Applied Physics96, 5420–5428 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1805726

    2004 doi

  15. [25]

    Springer (2019)

    Zhang, Z., Ling, W.Y.L., Tang, H., Cao, J., Liu, X., Wang, N.: A review of the characteriza- tion and optimization of ablative pulsed plasma thrusters. Springer (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41614-019-0027-z

    2019

  16. [26]

    Acta Astronautica173, 69–75 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actaastro.2020.04.010

    Huang, T., Wu, Z., Sun, G., Liu, X., Ling, W.Y.L.: Study and modeling of propellant ablation in coaxial ablative pulsed plasma thrusters. Acta Astronautica173, 69–75 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.actaastro.2020.04.010

    2020

  17. [27]

    Physics of Plasmas22(10), 103511 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933211

    Huang, T., Wu, Z., Liu, X., Xie, K., Wang, N., Cheng, Y.: Study of breakdown in an ablative pulsed plasma thruster. Physics of Plasmas22(10), 103511 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933211

    2015 doi

  18. [28]

    In: AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum

    Woodley, A., Heiser, R., Underwood, T.C.: Connecting ablative and gas-fed propellant utilization in electromagnetic thrusters. In: AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum. AIAA SciTech Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, V A (2026). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2026-0279

    2026 doi

  19. [29]

    Review of Scientific Instruments86, 063503 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4922522

    Loebner, K.T.K., Underwood, T.C., Cappelli, M.A.: A fast rise-rate, adjustable-mass-bit gas puff valve for energetic pulsed plasma experiments. Review of Scientific Instruments86, 063503 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4922522

    2015 doi

  20. [30]

    Journal of Applied Physics130, 133301 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051467

    Underwood, T.C., Riedel, W.M., Cappelli, M.A.: Dual mode operation of a hydromagnetic plasma thruster to achieve tunable thrust and specific impulse. Journal of Applied Physics130, 133301 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0051467

    2021 doi

  21. [31]

    Physical Review Letters115, 175001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett

    Loebner, K.T.K., Underwood, T.C., Cappelli, M.A.: Evidence of branching phenomena in current-driven ionization waves. Physical Review Letters115, 175001 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 115.175001

    2015 doi

  22. [32]

    MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (2020)

    Polzin, K., Martin, A., Little, J., Promislow, C., Jorns, B., Woods, J.: State-of-the-art and advancement paths for inductive pulsed plasma thrusters. MDPI Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/AEROSPACE7080105

    2020 doi

  23. [33]

    Technical report, Phillips Laboratory (December 1991)

    Castillo, S.: Establishment of MPD Performance. Technical report, Phillips Laboratory (December 1991)

    1991

  24. [34]

    AIAA Journal 9(9), 1681–1685 (1971) https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6418

    Cheng, D.Y.: Application of a deflagration plasma gun as a space propulsion thruster. AIAA Journal 9(9), 1681–1685 (1971) https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6418

    1971 doi

  25. [35]

    Journal of Propulsion and Power9(4), 553–560 (1993) https://doi.org/ 10.2514/3.23658

    York, T.M., Zakrzwski, C., Soulas, G.: Diagnostics and Performance of a Low-Power MPD Thruster with Applied Magnetic Nozzle. Journal of Propulsion and Power9(4), 553–560 (1993) https://doi.org/ 10.2514/3.23658

    1993 doi

  26. [36]

    AIAA International (2025)

    Zimmerman, J.W., Burton, R.L., Fox, R.T., Carroll, D.L., Broemmelsiek, E.J., Choueiri, E.: Pulsed Mag- netoplasmadynamic Propulsion for Airbreathing Satellites in Very Low Earth Orbit. AIAA International (2025). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B39990

    2025 doi

  27. [37]

    Review of Scientific Instruments76(8), 1–6 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2008047

    Winands, G.J.J., Liu, Z., Pemen, A.J.M., Van Heesch, E.J.M., Yan, K.: Long lifetime, triggered, spark- gap switch for repetitive pulsed power applications. Review of Scientific Instruments76(8), 1–6 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2008047

    2005 doi

  28. [38]

    In: 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit

    Ziemer, J.K., Choueiri, E.Y., Birx, D.: Is the gas-fed PPT an electromagnetic accelerator? an investiga- tion using measured performance. In: 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Los Angeles, California (1999). https...

    1999 doi

  29. [39]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (2026) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2026.3692821

    Laya, N.P., Tymoshevska, T., Chesny, D.L., Moffett, M.B., Boehm, K.J., Xu, K.G.: A Thyristor- Switched Pulsed Power System With 78-ns Jitter for a Coaxial Plasma Gun. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (2026) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2026.3692821

    2026

  30. [40]

    In: 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit

    Ziemer, J.K., Cubbin, E.A., Choueiri, E.Y., Birx, D.: Performance characterization of a high efficiency gas-fed pulsed plasma thruster. In: 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, Seattle, Washington (1997). h...

    1997 doi

  31. [41]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science50(9), 3065–3076 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2022.3189678

    Promislow, C., Little, J.: Operation and Performance of a Power Processing Unit for Inductive Pulsed Plasma Thrusters Operating at High Repetition Rates. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science50(9), 3065–3076 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2022.3189678

    2022

  32. [42]

    In: 2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Chicago, IL, USA (2011)

    Ziemba, T., Miller, K.E., Prager, J., Carscadden, J.: A robust, modular, IGBT power supply for config- urable series/parallel operation at high power and frequency. In: 2011 IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Chicago, IL, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/PPC.2011.6191607

    2011

  33. [43]

    Eagle Harbor Technologies technical presentation (2013)

    Miller, K.E.: The EHT Integrated Power Module (IPM): An IGBT-Based, High Current, Ultra-Fast, Modular, Programmable Power Supply Unit. Eagle Harbor Technologies technical presentation (2013)

    2013

  34. [44]

    In: AIAA 23rd Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, 1992

    Hauze, G.E., Green, J.E., Wallace, R.J.: Effect of anode size on deflagration accelerator performance. In: AIAA 23rd Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference, 1992. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA, Nashville, Tennessee (1992). https://doi.org/10.2514/6...

    1992 doi

  35. [45]

    Domonkos, M., Gallimore, A., Myers, R.: Preliminary pulsed mpd thruster performance (1995) https: //doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-2674

    1995 doi

  36. [46]

    Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (June 1971)

    Ducati, A.C., Jahn, R.G.: Investigation of pulsed quasi-steady MPD arc jets. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (June 1971)

    1971

  37. [47]

    AIP Advances15, 025007 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5

    Organski, L., Jeffers, B., Gresham, P., Kucharewicz, A., Shashurin, A.: Low-voltage operation mode of ascent-propelled pulsed plasma thruster. AIP Advances15, 025007 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0242934

    2025 doi

  38. [48]

    36th AIAA/AS- ME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (2000) https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-3432

    Ziemer, J., Choueiri, E.: A characteristic velocity for gas-fed ppt performance scaling. 36th AIAA/AS- ME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit (2000) https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-3432

    2000 doi

  39. [49]

    Physics of Plasmas17(12), 123508 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3526603

    Poehlmann, F.R., Cappelli, M.A., Rieker, G.B.: Current distribution measurements inside an elec- tromagnetic plasma gun operated in a gas-puff mode. Physics of Plasmas17(12), 123508 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3526603

    2010 doi

  40. [50]

    High Energy Density Physics23, 73–80 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Underwood, T.C., Loebner, K.T.K., Cappelli, M.A.: A plasma deflagration accelerator as a platform for laboratory astrophysics. High Energy Density Physics23, 73–80 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hedp.2017.03.004

    2017 doi

  41. [51]

    Journal of Applied Physics57(3), 961–964 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334697

    Woodall, D.M., Len, L.K.: Observation of current sheath transition from snowplow to deflagration. Journal of Applied Physics57(3), 961–964 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334697

    1985 doi

  42. [52]

    Journal of Applied Physics 136(16), 163301 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0229983

    Liu, S., Qi, L., Zhang, G., Xiao, D., Yu, S.: Effects of discharge parameters on plasma acceleration and transmission characteristics of a coaxial gun operated in gas-prefilled mode. Journal of Applied Physics 136(16), 163301 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0229983

    2024 doi

  43. [53]

    Physical Review 80(2), 230–238 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.230

    Cohen, R.S., Spitzer, L., Routly, P.M.: The Electrical Conductivity of an Ionized Gas. Physical Review 80(2), 230–238 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.80.230

    1950 doi

  44. [54]

    Plasma Sources Science and Technology10(3), 395–405 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/10/3/302

    Ziemer, J.K., Choueiri, E.Y.: Scaling laws for electromagnetic pulsed plasma thrusters. Plasma Sources Science and Technology10(3), 395–405 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/10/3/302

    2001 doi

  45. [55]

    Journal of Computational Physics366, 207–225 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.041

    Subramaniam, V., Raja, L.L.: A plasma–vacuum interface tracking algorithm for magnetohydrodynamic simulations of coaxial plasma accelerators. Journal of Computational Physics366, 207–225 (2018) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.041

    2018 doi

  46. [56]

    PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2026)

    Baghirzade, M.: Computational modeling of plasma discharges in air-breathing electric propulsion devices for very low Earth orbit satellites. PhD thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin (2026)

    2026

  47. [57]

    Plasma Sources Science Technology27(2018)

    Subramaniam, V., Underwood, T.C., Raja, L.L., Cappelli, M.A.: Computational and experimental investigation of plasma deflagration jets and detonation shocks in coaxial plasma accelerators. Plasma Sources Science Technology27(2018)

    2018

  48. [58]

    Journal of Applied Physics 140(4), 043302 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0325672

    Baghirzade, M., Underwood, T.C., Raja, L.L.: MHD modeling of magneto-deflagration and magneto- detonation modes of air plasma jets in coaxial plasma accelerators in VLEO. Journal of Applied Physics 140(4), 043302 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0325672

    2026 doi

  49. [59]

    Applied Physics Letters108, 094104 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4943370

    Loebner, K.T.K., Underwood, T.C., Mouratidis, T., Cappelli, M.A.: Radial magnetic compression in the expelled jet of a plasma deflagration accelerator. Applied Physics Letters108, 094104 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4943370

    2016 doi

  50. [60]

    Fusion Engineering and Design144, 97–106 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.04.088

    Underwood, T.C., Subramaniam, V., Riedel, W.M., Raja, L.L., Cappelli, M.A.: Effects of flow col- lisionality on ELM replication in plasma guns. Fusion Engineering and Design144, 97–106 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.04.088

    2019 doi

  51. [61]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science36(5), 2632–2637 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2008.2003971

    Bortis, D., Biela, J., Kolar, J.W.: Active Gate Control for Current Balancing of Parallel-Connected IGBT Modules in Solid-State Modulators. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science36(5), 2632–2637 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2008.2003971

    2008

  52. [62]

    In: IECON 2016 - 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp

    Matallana, A., Andreu, J., Garate, J.I., Aretxabaleta, I., Planas, E.: Analysis and modelling of IGBTs parallelization fundamentals. In: IECON 2016 - 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 3247–3252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2016.7793367

    2016

  53. [63]

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science39(1), 364–367 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2010.2068061

    Zorngiebel, V., Hecquard, M., Spahn, E., Welleman, A., Scharnholz, S.: Modular 50-kV IGBT Switch for Pulsed-Power Applications. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science39(1), 364–367 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2010.2068061

    2011

  54. [64]

    In: IECON 2014 - 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp

    Anthon, A., Hernandez, J.C., Zhang, Z., Andersen, M.A.E.: Switching investigations on a SiC MOSFET in a TO-247 package. In: IECON 2014 - 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 1854–1860 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2014.7048754

    2014

  55. [65]

    Experiments in Fluids61, 17 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2848-5

    Underwood, T.C., Loebner, K.T.K., Miller, V.A., Cappelli, M.A.: Schlieren diagnostic for cinematic visualization of dense plasma jets at alfv´ enic timescales. Experiments in Fluids61, 17 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2848-5

    2019 doi

  56. [66]

    Scientific Reports9, 2588 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39827-6

    Underwood, T.C., Loebner, K.T.K., Miller, V.A., Cappelli, M.A.: Dynamic formation of stable current- driven plasma jets. Scientific Reports9, 2588 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39827-6

    2019 doi

  57. [67]

    Technical report, Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL (2012)

    Balay, S., Brown, J., Buschelman, K., Eijkhout, V., Gropp, W.D., Kaushik, D., Knepley, M.G., McInnes, L.C., Smith, B.F., Zhang, H.: PETSc Users Manual, Revision 3.3. Technical report, Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL (2012)

    2012

  58. [68]

    SoftwareX12, 100575 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100575

    Scoggins, J.B., Leroy, V., Bellas-Chatzigeorgis, G., Dias, B., Magin, T.E.: Mutation++: MUlticom- ponent Thermodynamic And Transport properties for IONized gases in C++. SoftwareX12, 100575 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100575

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.