Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

New gravitational instanton: shadow of an extra dimension

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a five-dimensional warped Kerr-like brane-world solution gives rise, under complexification, to an exact self-dual gravitational instanton on the brane.

desk verdict The claimed conformal Kähler instanton fails because the Kähler form is already closed, forcing any conformal factor to be constant. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03536 v1 pith:BRT3IBGG submitted 2026-08-04 gr-qc

Reinoud Jan Slagter This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C2083C5783E1553C55
keywords gravitationalinstantonbrane-worldconformalKählerself-dualityKleinbottleantipodalidentificationKerr-likemetricHawkingradiation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that an exact five-dimensional, warped, Kerr-like brane-world solution, when Wick-rotated and complexified, leaves on the brane a four-dimensional Euclidean metric that is a gravitational instanton. The metric is fixed by a first-order differential equation with an integer parameter, and the angular-momentum component decouples from the rest of the field equations. The paper constructs a Kähler potential and a two-form K, then claims that a suitable conformal factor makes Ω²K closed, so the effective geometry is conformally Kähler and self-dual on the topology S³×R/Z₂. The motivating payoff is that this instanton gives a regular interior, a pure-state description of Hawking radiation via antipodal identification, and a possible nucleation mechanism for primordial black holes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the conformal Kähler form K on the effective Euclidean manifold. K is built from a Kähler potential κ obtained by integrating the metric function N² twice, and is made closed by a conformal factor Ω, so that d(Ω²K)=0. The metric function itself is controlled by the first-order equation rN∂_rN + N² = (k+1)/2 (r−a)^k, the analogue of the first-order self-duality equation in Eguchi-Hanson. A double cover of S³ via stereographic projection onto CP¹×CP¹, together with the Z₂/Klein-surface identification, supplies the topology S³×R/Z₂, while the complex transformation of Eq. (60) makes self-duality manifest and the decoupling of Nφ lets angular momentum be transformed away lo

What would settle it

Compute d(Ω²K) directly for the effective metric (54) with κ from (53) on S³×R/Z₂ and check whether any smooth positive Ω satisfies the closure condition; alternatively, extract the self-dual part of the Weyl tensor in the chiral tetrad formalism and test whether the self-dual curvature equations of the paper hold. A concrete failure to find such an Ω, or a nonzero anti-self-dual curvature component, would falsify the instanton claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the complexified effective four-dimensional metric extracted from the five-dimensional conformally invariant Kerr-like brane-world solution is a gravitational instanton. After Wick rotation and the complex transformation of Eq. (60), the metric (54) is written as a locally conformally Kähler manifold with Kähler potential κ of Eq. (53) and two-form K of Eq. (56); the paper asserts that d(Ω²K)=0 for a suitable conformal factor Ω. The metric function N comes from the first-order equation (9) with integer parameter k, making the solution exact and placing its self-duality in the same formal setting as the Eguchi-Hanson and Fubini-Study instantons. The topology is S³×R/

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a smooth global conformal factor Ω exists on the Klein-bottle quotient S³×R/Z₂ that makes the two-form Ω²K closed; the paper asserts this 'by suitable choice of Ω' but gives no existence, regularity, or compatibility proof, and without it the conformal Kähler and self-duality claims collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The effective four-dimensional metric is an exact self-dual Euclidean solution, placing it in the same family as the Eguchi-Hanson and Fubini-Study instantons rather than in the standard quartic axisymmetric family.
  • With the Klein-bottle topology S³×R/Z₂, Hawking evaporation can be described as a topological transition with antipodal identification, so the radiation state remains pure and no cut-and-paste construction is needed.
  • The central singularity of the Kerr-like interior is removable after complexification, so the black hole interior can be regular while the quintic root locations track the evaporation path in the complex plane.
  • Because Nφ decouples, angular momentum is locally a coordinate artifact: an internal observer can choose a frame with no rotation, while an external observer sees a Kerr-like geometry.
  • The integer parameter k in the first-order metric equation ties the solution to quantized structure, and the same instanton can mediate the nucleation of primordial black holes from the Euclidean vacuum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct computation of the self-dual part of the Weyl tensor in the chiral tetrad formalism described in the paper would settle the instanton claim; the paper sketches the formalism but does not exhibit the calculation.
  • The Klein-bottle fibration suggests a U(1) monopole-like quantization of the horizon; computing the first Chern class of the fibration over S² would predict discrete area or angular-momentum levels that could be observationally tested.
  • If the angular-momentum decoupling is more than a coordinate choice, a detector measuring frame dragging outside a brane black hole would see a profile different from Kerr, which would distinguish this model from classical general relativity.
  • The identification of the observed 'little red dots' with instanton-nucleated primordial black holes is speculative in the paper; deriving a production rate from the Euclidean action would make that claim testable against number counts.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct a new exact gravitational instanton in a five-dimensional warped Randall-Sundrum brane-world model. Starting from a previously obtained Kerr-like solution (Eq. (8)), the author takes the effective four-dimensional Euclidean metric (Eq. (54)) and proposes that it is locally conformally Kähler, with Kähler potential κ in Eq. (53) and a two-form K in Eq. (56). The central mathematical step is the assertion that a conformal factor Ω can be chosen so that d(Ω²K)=0, which is then used to conclude self-duality and hence the gravitational-instanton property. The paper also introduces a global topology S³×R/Z₂ with Klein-bottle identifications and uses this to motivate a picture of Hawking radiation remaining in a pure state. The main advertised results are the instanton interpretation and the connection between the quintic singular structure and black-hole evaporation.

Significance. If the construction were correct, it would provide a new self-dual Euclidean solution in a brane-world setting and offer an interesting bridge between gravitational instantons, black-hole evaporation, and the antipodal-identification proposal of 't Hooft. The author is to be credited for making the attempt concrete: the metric, the first-order equation (9), and the complex transformation (60) are written explicitly, which is more than a purely verbal proposal. However, the central assertion on which the instanton claim rests—the existence of a nonconstant conformal factor making the effective metric conformally Kähler—is not only unproved; it is false for the stated two-form K. Since this step is the sole basis for self-duality, the advertised result is not established. No machine-checkable derivation, completeness proof, or finite-action computation is supplied. The paper therefore does not meet the standards for a claim of a new gravitational instanton.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (56)] The decisive step is Eq. (56), where K is written as ∂ξ∂ξ̄κ1 dξ∧dξ̄ + ∂χ∂χ̄κ2 dχ∧dχ̄. Each term is the ∂∂̄ of a function, hence dK=0, assuming the κi are the stated local potentials. The conformal Kähler condition d(Ω²K)=0 then reduces to 2Ω dΩ∧K=0. On the open dense set where the coefficients of K are nonzero, K is nondegenerate; therefore dΩ=0 there, and by continuity Ω is constant. A constant conformal factor cannot absorb the r² term or the dilaton factor ω² in Eq. (54). Thus no nonconstant Ω of the type invoked can exist. If, on the other hand, K is not closed because the κi are not genuine local potentials, then the paper never formulates or solves the equation for Ω; the statement 'by suitable choice of Ω' is unsubstantiated. In either branch, the claimed conformal Kähler structure—and with it the self-duality conclusion—collapses.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (11)] Eq. (11) reads N² = 4/z² ∫ z(z−a)³ dz = 0. As written this is internally inconsistent: for k=3 and C1=0, Eq. (8) gives N² = C2[(t−t0)⁴+C3]/r² · (r−a)⁴(4r+a)/5, which is not identically zero and does not equal the displayed indefinite integral. The subsequent appeal to Cauchy's theorem and to removable singularities rests on this ill-defined identity. The first-order equation (9) itself is quoted from previous work rather than derived here; that is acceptable for background, but the new regularity argument based on Eq. (11) is not.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (53) and (57)] The Kähler potential κ in Eq. (53) is said to be obtained by twice integrating N², but the actual relation between this κ and the metric components of Eq. (54) is not demonstrated. The integration constants α1 and α2 are arbitrary and no condition fixes them so that the physical metric (54) is reproduced. Moreover, Eq. (56) introduces a second potential κ2 for the (z,φ) block, but neither its explicit form nor the relation ∂χ∂χ̄κ2 = r² is proved. The conformal Kähler structure is therefore not actually constructed; it is only asserted.
  4. [Sec. 4.1 and Secs. 4.2–4.3] No completeness, regularity, or finite-action check is supplied for the claimed manifold S³×R/Z₂. The paper asserts that the Klein-bottle topology and dianalytic transitions are physically admissible, but it does not verify that the metric and conformal factor extend smoothly across the antipodal identifications, nor that the apparent singularities at r=a are removable. For a gravitational instanton these are load-bearing properties, not decoration. The manuscript itself is internally inconsistent on this point: the Introduction says 'We conjecture that this effective geometry represents a gravitational instanton', while §4.2 states 'We have proven that our solution is a gravitational instanton.' The gap is never resolved.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (8) and subsequent text] Eq. (8) displays N² with an explicit (t−t0)⁴ + C3 dependence, but all later equations, e.g. (34), (50), (54), treat N as a function of r only. Clarify the stationary limit or justify the omission of the time dependence.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (52) and (54)] The notation for conformal factors is confusing: Ω_k is introduced in Eq. (52), Ω appears in Eq. (56), and ω is the dilaton/warp factor in Eq. (54). The relations among ω, Ω, and Ω_k are never stated.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous typos and LaTeX artifacts, e.g., 'Khler' for 'Kähler', 'Pcard-Fuchs' for 'Picard–Fuchs' in ref. 35, 'Jans' for Janis, and missing accent in 'Pleba´ nski'. The matrix in Eq. (25) is not typeset correctly.
  4. [Eq. (42)] Eq. (42) contains the expression ∂C(U)/∂C, which appears to be a typo for ∂C(r*)/∂r* or similar. The chain-rule factors in Eqs. (40)–(43) should be re-derived and displayed consistently.
  5. [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 is referenced but the connection between the plotted Klein bottle and the metric (36) is not explained. The caption should state what curves are plotted and how they relate to the claimed topology.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The instanton claim is imposed by construction: κ is the double integral of the metric function N² and Ω is asserted to force d(Ω²K)=0; self-duality is never independently demonstrated.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.2, Eqs. (38)-(40), (53), (56)]
    "ds^2_{2D}=N(r)^2 dτ^2 + 1/N(r)^2 dr^2 = ∂_ξ∂_{\bar ξ}κ dξ∧d\bar ξ ... dC/dr=1/N^2, d^2J/dC^2=4N(C)^2 ... We observed that N^2(r) is twice integrable, with κ=r^2(1/25 r^3-1/4 r^2+2/3 r-1)-1/5 ln r+α_1 r+α_2 ... Finally we arrive at our 2-form ... \tilde K=Ω(r)^2K=Ω(r)^2[∂_ξ∂_{\bar ξ}κ_1 dξ∧d\bar ξ+∂_χ∂_{\bar χ}κ_2 dχ∧d\bar χ]"

    The 'Kähler form' of the first block is manufactured by defining κ as a double antiderivative of N² (Eq. 40 and Eq. 53). Any two-dimensional metric of the form N²dτ²+N^{-2}dr² can be written as ∂∂̄κ in these coordinates, so this step is a coordinate rewriting of the ansatz, not an independent geometric property. The 4D Kähler form is then assembled from this κ and a second block in Eq. (56), so the claimed conformal-Kähler structure does not follow from the field equations; it is built into the definitions of κ and K.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2, immediately after Eq. (56); conclusion repeated in Section 6]
    "We isolated the r^2-term and absorbed it in the conformal factor. Further, by suitable choice of Ω, we can obtain d(Ω^2K)=0. Remember that we still have the dilaton factor ∼ω^2 in front of ¯g_{μν}. We have proven that our solution is a gravitational instanton, comparable with the FS."

    The condition d(Ω²K)=0 is exactly the conformal-Kähler criterion, and it is the sole evidence offered for the instanton/self-duality claim. Ω is not constructed or solved for; it is declared 'suitable' after having been used to 'absorb' the r² and dilaton factors. Moreover, each term in Eq. (56) is ∂∂̄ of a function, so K is d-closed; then d(Ω²K)=2Ω dΩ∧K, which forces dΩ=0 wherever K is nondegenerate. Thus the only allowed Ω is constant and cannot perform the nonconstant rescaling the argument requires. The paper therefore assumes the existence of the very conformal factor that the conclusion depends on, rather than deriving the instanton from the field equations.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: solve (6)-(7) for N² and ω; use N² to define a Kähler potential κ by Eq. (40)/(53); form K by Eq. (56); assert a 'suitable' conformal factor Ω makes d(Ω²K)=0; then declare the metric a gravitational instanton. The first step is a rewriting of the 2D metric in Kähler coordinates, and the last step is an existence assertion for Ω that is both unproved and, as written, inconsistent because a closed nondegenerate K forces Ω constant. No independent verification of self-duality (e.g., a Plebański curvature computation or Weyl-tensor check) is provided. The comparison with Eguchi-Hanson and Fubini-Study is qualitative; the EH/FS self-duality is established by their known metrics and curvature, while here the analogous property is imposed by the choice of κ and Ω. The paper also relies on the author's own prior solutions (refs. 1-5) for the starting exact solution, but the main circularity is the definitional/fitted character of the conformal-Kähler step, not the self-citations per se. Score 8: the claimed result is substantially forced by the construction rather than derived from independent equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a metric function quoted from the author's prior work, an unspecified conformal factor used to force the Kähler condition, and a conjectural Klein-bottle topology. The free parameters and ad hoc assumptions are numerous, and no independent evidence is supplied for the invented topological structure.

free parameters (5)
  • integer parameter k = integer, e.g., k=3 in the quintic case; not determined by field equations
    Appears in the first-order equation (9) and in the solution (8); the paper says it appears to be quantized and takes integer values but does not derive it from the field equations.
  • constants (a, b_i, t0, C_i) = arbitrary integration constants; C1 controls the quintic roots
    In solution (8), the metric and dilaton depend on these constants; for the interior metric C1=0 is chosen by hand in Section 4.1.
  • Kähler integration constants α1, α2 = unspecified
    Appear in Eq. (53) for the Kähler potential after integrating N^2 twice.
  • fine-tuned cosmological relation Lambda_eff = Lambda_eff = (3/(8 3sqrt(18))) kappa5^{4/3} b5^2 kappa4^2 b4^2 Lambda5
    Eq. (10) is imposed if one allows fine tuning to satisfy the simultaneous 5D and 4D equations.
  • arbitrary function F_d(t) in N_phi = unspecified
    Appears in Eq. (8) for the angular momentum component; the equation is decoupled and F_d(t) is left free.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Five-dimensional Randall-Sundrum brane-world with conformal dilaton Lagrangian (1) and metric ansatz (2) is the correct physical setting.
    The entire construction is built on this model; no derivation from an underlying theory is provided beyond citations to [1-5,10-12].
  • ad hoc to paper The effective four-dimensional geometry can be written in locally conformally Kähler form, i.e., Ω exists with d(Ω^2 K)=0.
    This is the key geometric assumption underlying the instanton claim; it is asserted by suitable choice of Ω rather than proven, Section 4.2.
  • ad hoc to paper Antipodal identification on S^3 x R / Z2 with Klein bottle topology and dianalytic structure is physically admissible.
    Introduced in Section 4.1 and Conclusions to model Hawking particles; no field equation or independent evidence forces this topology.
  • standard math Calabi's theorem on Kähler immersions and the Euclidean section obtained by Wick rotation are applicable.
    The paper invokes Calabi [7] and Plebański/Krasnov [9] to justify first-order equations and Kähler structure.
  • domain assumption The field equations reduce to the quoted first-order equation (9) and the spin component decouples, as claimed from earlier work.
    This is the load-bearing technical result; the present paper does not reproduce the derivation and relies on refs [1-5].
invented entities (2)
  • Klein bottle hypersurface topology S^3 x R / Z2 with dianalytic transitions
    purpose: To encode Hawking particle information in global topology and avoid cut-and-paste constructions.
    Proposed in Section 4.1 and Conclusions as a conjecture. No observable signature is derived from the topology itself.
  • centrix located on the Klein bottle rather than on a torus
    purpose: Describes the location of the horizon-related structure under antipodal identification.
    Mentioned in the Introduction but never defined; it functions as an explanatory placeholder rather than a derived quantity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New gravitational instanton: shadow of an extra dimension." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRT3IBGG

@misc{pith2026260803536,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New gravitational instanton: shadow of an extra dimension},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRT3IBGG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03536}
}
abstract

We present an exact gravitational instanton solution on a five-dimensional, conformally invariant, Kerr-like warped Riemannian brane-world manifold. The geometry can be described as the K\"ahler manifold $\mathbb{C}^1\times\mathbb{C}^1\times \mathbb{R}$. By applying a double cover of $S^3$ through stereographic projection onto $\mathbb{C}P^1\times \mathbb{C}P^1$ of the effective four-dimensional manifold, together with the Klein surface construction, we exploit the underlying $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry. The instanton is then obtained by fibering over the antipodal $S^2$. The metric is determined by a first-order differential equation containing an integer parameter, while the equation governing the angular momentum component decouples from the remaining field equations. Finally, we show that our solution admits an analytic complex transformation to a locally conformally related K\"ahler manifold possessing a K\"ahler potential, thereby making the self-dual structure manifest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03536 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Plot of N(r) 2 for several values of a. We observe for large value of a, there are two zero’s. When a decreases, it turns out that the for r → ±0, N2 tends to +∞. Finally the singularity at r = 0 does not exist there. Reversing this evolution suggests that black-hole horizons may emerge from a regular gravitational instanton configuration. After complexifying our manifold, we obtain, as we shall see, a markedly diff… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Possible locations of the zeros of the quintic (red) compared with those of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ’Dance’ of the roots in the complex plane for several values of a and C1. solution is the unique static, asymptotically flat vacuum solution possessing a regu￾lar event horizon. In contrast, an asymmetric collapsing body is expected to radiate away its higher multipole moments before settling into the Schwarzschild geometry. If the event horizon itself were singular, the formation of trapped surfaces would be obstru… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top left: Surface of revolution of the interior. Top right:The Klein bottle with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Plot of the two complex metric component 1/N(R). Ncomp(R) = (R + a) 4 (5a ± 4i(R + a)) 5(a ± i(R + a))2 (60) In Fig. (5) we plot the inverse for both signs. The Khler potential can also be ob￾tained for the first block from the relation ∂R∂R¯κ = Ncomp(R). In addition, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [5]

    R. J. Slagter, A New Self-Dual Gravitational Instanton Solution on a Local Conformal K¨ ahlerian Manifold in a Brane World Model, arXiv: gr-qc/260525532

    work page arXiv

  2. [1]

    R. J. Slagter, Quantum Black Holes in Conformal Dilaton Higgs Gravity on Warped Spacetimes, Universe9, 383 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [2]

    R. J. Slagter, Black Holes and Cosmic Strings Revisited; Amazon Publishing: Seattle, W A, USA, (2024). August 5, 2026 0:58 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE slagterD New gravitational instanton23

    work page 2024

  4. [3]

    R. J. Slagter, Everything You Need to Know About Black Holes: Shadow of an Extra Dimension, Cambridge Scholar Publ.: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [4]

    R. J. Slagter, Primordial Black Holes and Instantons: Shadow of an Extra Dimension, Universe12, 26 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsky, A New Look at the Pleba´ nski-Demia´ nski family of Solutions, arXiv: gr-qc/0511091v1

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Calabi, M´ etriques K¨ ahl´ eriennes et fibr´ es holomorphes, Ann

    E. Calabi, M´ etriques K¨ ahl´ eriennes et fibr´ es holomorphes, Ann. Sc. de l’E.N.S. 4e s´ erie, tome12, 269, (1979)

    work page 1979

  8. [8]

    Aksteiner and L

    S. Aksteiner and L. Anderson, Gravitational Instantons and Special Geometry, arXiv: gr-qc/21121186

    arXiv

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Krasnov, Formulations of General Relativity; Cambridge Monograms of Math

    K. Krasnov, Formulations of General Relativity; Cambridge Monograms of Math. Phys., Cambridge, UK, (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.,83, 3370 (1999)

    1999

  3. [11]

    Randall and Sundrum, An Alternative to Compactification, Phys

    L. Randall and Sundrum, An Alternative to Compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett.,83, 4690 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    Shiromizu, K

    T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda and M. Sasaki, M., The Einstein Equations on the 3-Brane World, Phys. Rev. D62, 024012 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    t Hooft, Black Hole Unitarity and Antipodal Entanglement, Found

    ’G. t Hooft, Black Hole Unitarity and Antipodal Entanglement, Found. Phys.46, 1185, (2016)

    2016

  6. [14]

    Janis , E

    A. Janis , E. T. Newman and J. Winicour, Reality of the Schwarzschild Singularity, Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 878 (1968)

    1968

  7. [15]

    E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, Note on the Kerr Spinning Particle Metric, J. Math. Phys.,6, 915 (1965)

    1965

  8. [16]

    Eguchi and A

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson, Self-Dual Solutions to Euclidean Gravity, Ann. Phys. 120, 82 (1979)

    1979

  9. [17]

    ’t Hooft, The Quantum Black Hole as a Theoretical Lab, a Pedagogical Treatment of a New Approach, arXiv: gr-qc/190210469 (2019)

    G. ’t Hooft, The Quantum Black Hole as a Theoretical Lab, a Pedagogical Treatment of a New Approach, arXiv: gr-qc/190210469 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    ’t Hooft, The Black Hole Firewall Transformation and Realism in Quantum Me- chanics, Universe,7, 298, (2021)

    G. ’t Hooft, The Black Hole Firewall Transformation and Realism in Quantum Me- chanics, Universe,7, 298, (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    ’t Hooft, Local Conformal Symmetry: The Missing Symmetry Component for Space and Time, Int

    G. ’t Hooft, Local Conformal Symmetry: The Missing Symmetry Component for Space and Time, Int. J. of Mod. Phys. D.,24, 1543001, (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    ’t Hooft, Quantum Gravity without Spacetime Singularities or Horizons, arXiv: gr-qc/09093426 (2009)

    G. ’t Hooft, Quantum Gravity without Spacetime Singularities or Horizons, arXiv: gr-qc/09093426 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    ’t Hooft, The Conformal Constraint in Canonical Quantum Gravity, arXiv: gr- qc/1011006 (2010)

    G. ’t Hooft, The Conformal Constraint in Canonical Quantum Gravity, arXiv: gr- qc/1011006 (2010)

    2010

  14. [22]

    R. J. Slagter and S. Pan, A New Fate of of a warped 5D FLR W Model with aU(1) Scalar Gauge Field, Found. Phys.46, 1075 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    F. J. Ernst, New Formulation of the Axially Symmetric Gravitational Field Problem, Physical Review,167, 1175 (1968)

    1968

  16. [24]

    E. J. Flaherty, Hermitian and K¨ ahlerian Geometry in Relativity, Lecture notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin (1976)

    1976

  17. [25]

    Eguchi, P

    T. Eguchi, P. B. Gilkey and A. J.Hanson, Gravitation, Gauge Theories and Differ- ential Geometry, Phys. Rep.66, 213 (1980)

    1980

  18. [26]

    Ornea, and M

    L. Ornea, and M. Verbitsky, Principles of Locally Conformally K¨ ahler Geometry, Birkhauser (2024), arXiv: 220807188 (2022)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Aksteiner and B

    S. Aksteiner and B. Araneda, K¨ ahler Geometry of Black Holes and Gravitational Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 161502 (2022). August 5, 2026 0:58 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE slagterD 24Slagter, R. J

    2022

  20. [28]

    J. F. Pleba´ nski, On the Separation of Einsteinian Substructure, J. Math. Phys.,18, 2511 (1977)

    1977

  21. [29]

    J. H. Kim, Newman-Jans Algorithm from Taub-Nut Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 231401 (2026), arXiv gr-qc/241219611, (2024)

    2026

  22. [30]

    E. T. Newman, On a Classical, Geometric Origin of Magnetic Moments, Spin-Angular Momentum and the Dirac Gyromagnetic Ratio, Phys. Rev. D65, 10 (2002), arXiv: gr-qc/0201055 (2002)

    2002 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Lynden-Bell, A Magic Electromagnetic Field, in Stellar Astrophysical Fluid Dy- namics, Cambridge Univ Press, 369 (2003), arXiv: astro-ph/0207064 (2002)

    D. Lynden-Bell, A Magic Electromagnetic Field, in Stellar Astrophysical Fluid Dy- namics, Cambridge Univ Press, 369 (2003), arXiv: astro-ph/0207064 (2002)

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. B. Griffiths, P. Krtous and J. Podolsky, J., Interpreting the C-Metric, Class. Quan- tum Grav.23, 6745 (2006). arXiv: gr-qc/0609056

    2006 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Arkani-Hamed, Y

    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Huang and D. O’Connell, Kerr Black holes as Elementary Particles, JHEP, 01, (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    D. S. Freed, and K. K. Uhlenbeck, Instantons and Four-Manifolds, Springer: New York, NY, USA, (1984)

    1984

  27. [35]

    Fr´ e and A

    P. Fr´ e and A. S. Sorin, Axial symmetric K¨ ahler manifolds, the D-map of inflation potentials and the Pcard-Fuchs equation, Prog. of Phys.62, 26 (2012). ,arXiv:hep- th/13105278

    2012

  28. [36]

    D. D. Joyce, Riemannian Holonomy Groups and Calibrated Geometry. Oxford Grad. Texts, Oxford Univ. Press, (2007) Candelas, P., De La Ossa, X. C., Green, P. S. and Parkes, L.,A pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an Exactly Soluble Superconformal Theory, Nucl. Phys.B59, 21 (1991)

    2007

  29. [37]

    R. J. Slagter, Alternative for Black Hole Paradoxes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A.37, 2250176-1 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Candelas, X

    P. Candelas, X. E. De La Ossa, P. Green and L. Parkes, A Pair of Calabi-Yau Man- ifolds as an Exactly Soluble Superconformal Theory, Nucl. Phys.,B358, 21 (1991)

    1991

  31. [39]

    Toth, Finite M¨ obius Groups, Minimal Immersions of Spheres and Moduli, Springer, (2002)

    G. Toth, Finite M¨ obius Groups, Minimal Immersions of Spheres and Moduli, Springer, (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    Deser, R

    S. Deser, R. Jackiw and G. ’t Hooft, Three-Dimensional Einstein Gravity: Dynamics of Flat Space, Ann. Phys.152, 220 (1992)

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.