Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 80 references

A new perspective on non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Drinfel'd-twist deformations built from active symmetries are gauge-invariant under a weak unimodularity condition, and planar diagrams keep their undeformed internal structure with the twist only on external legs.

desk verdict A careful, genuinely useful construction paper on twist-deformed gauge theories; the active-picture star product, R-unimodularity condition, and planar equivalence theorem are new and the proofs hold up, though the advertised N=4 scope is narrowed by the off-shell linear SUSY assumption that the paper itself acknowledges. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04097 v1 pith:4KVB7VOJ submitted 2026-08-04 hep-th

Riccardo Borsato , Tim Meier This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T7581T1316T0517B37 PACS 11.10.Nx11.15.-q
keywords Drinfel'dtwistnon-commutativefieldtheorystarproductgaugeplanarequivalencetheoremunimodularityconditionN=4superYang-MillsYang-Baxterdeformations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a general way to build non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories from Drinfel'd twists made out of symmetries of the undeformed theory, realized as active transformations of fields instead of passive coordinate changes. Realizing the symmetries actively makes partial derivatives obey the ordinary Leibniz rule even for star products, so covariant derivatives and gauge transformations can be set up directly. The paper shows that gauge-invariant actions require the star product to be cyclic under integration, and that cyclicity is exactly the R-unimodularity condition $S(V)=V$ with $V=m(S\otimes 1)F^{-1}$, which is weaker than the F-unimodularity condition used in earlier work and is compatible with the equivalence relation among twists. It also proves a planar equivalence theorem: every planar Feynman diagram of the deformed theory has the same internal structure as the undeformed one, with the twist acting only on the external legs through the inverse opposite twist. If the construction is right, many previously excluded twists, including extended Jordanian and mixed conformal-supersymmetric twists, become consistent deformations of gauge theories, with applications to holographic duals of homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations of $AdS_5\times S^5$.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Drinfel'd twist $F=f^\alpha\otimes f_\alpha$, an element of the universal enveloping algebra of the symmetry algebra of the undeformed theory, together with its active-transformation image $\hat F$, in which a generator $X$ acts through the Weyl-Lie derivative $L^W_{-X}$ on fields. The star product is defined by $\Phi_1\hat{\star}\Phi_2=\mu(\hat F(\Phi_1\otimes\Phi_2))$, and associativity follows from the twist cocycle condition. The load-bearing identity connects cyclicity under integration to the element $V=m(S\otimes 1)F^{-1}$: integration by parts gives $\int d^dx\, W_1\hat{\star}W_2=\int d^dx\, W_1 S(\hat V^{-1})W_2$, so requiring $\int W_1\hat{\star}W_2=\int W_2\hat{\star}W_1$ is exactly the R-unimodularity condition $S(\hat V)=\hat V$. The planar equivalence theorem is carried by the twisted propagator $\Delta^{\hat{\star}}_F(x,y)=\hat V_y\Delta_F(x-y)$ and by Ward-identity invariance of the undeformed propagator under the symmetry algebra; together these give $\hat F_{xy}\Delta^{\hat{\star}}_F(x,y)=\Delta_F(x-y)$, so internal contractions reduce to the undeformed propagator and the inverse opposite twist $\hat{\bar F}^{(k)}_{op}$ survives only on external legs. Here 'opposite' means the two tensor factors are exchanged, $F_{op}=\tau F$.

What would settle it

Take a gauge theory deformed by a non-F-unimodular but R-unimodular twist, for example the equivalent abelian twist $F'=e^{2\xi\,a\otimes b}$ with commuting translations $a,b$, and compute a one-loop planar four-point amplitude; the planar equivalence theorem predicts it equals the undeformed planar amplitude dressed by the inverse opposite twist on the external legs, so finding any twist insertion on an internal propagator or vertex would falsify the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the obstacles to twist-deforming gauge theories disappear once the Drinfel'd twist is constructed from symmetries of the seed theory and evaluated on active field transformations. In that picture the star product is $\Phi_1\hat{\star}\Phi_2=\mu(\hat F(\Phi_1\otimes\Phi_2))$, where $\hat F$ is the twist acting on fields only; active transformations commute with partial derivatives, so $\partial_\mu(\Phi_1\hat{\star}\Phi_2)=\partial_\mu\Phi_1\hat{\star}\Phi_2+\Phi_1\hat{\star}\partial_\mu\Phi_2$. This makes it straightforward to write covariant derivatives $D_\mu\Phi=\partial_\mu\Phi-iA_\mu\hat{\star}\Phi$ and field strengths $F_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu A_\nu-\partial_\nu A_\mu-i[A_\mu\hat{\star},A_\nu]$ with the correct star-gauge transformation laws. The paper proves that gauge invariance of the deformed action is equivalent to cyclicity of the star product under integration, and that cyclicity is equivalent to the R-unimodularity condition $S(V)=V$; the earlier F-unimodularity condition $V=1$ is sufficient but stronger than necessary and is not invariant under equivalent twists. It then proves the planar equivalence theorem, showing that planar diagrams of the deformed theory are the undeformed diagrams dressed by the inverse opposite twist on external legs, so the twist never enters the internal propagators or vertices of planar diagrams.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every symmetry generator used in a twist acts linearly and off-shell on the fields, which requires keeping auxiliary fields and not gauge-fixing; for N=4 super Yang-Mills this rules out twists that need more than two supercharges to be realized at the same time, because no off-shell N=4 superspace formulation exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All previously known twist deformations of gauge theories, such as the Groenewold-Moyal, dipole, angular-dipole, and scale-twist constructions, are recast in this active-transformation language, and the family of admissible twists is enlarged because R-unimodularity is invariant under twist equivalence.
  • Twist deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills can be constructed for every twist built from symmetries that are linearly and off-shell realized, which covers abelian, almost abelian, and unimodular extended Jordanian twists that require at most two copies of supersymmetry.
  • Planar correlation functions of deformed theories reduce to undeformed planar diagrams with the inverse opposite twist acting on external legs, extending the planar equivalence theorem from Groenewold-Moyal and Poincaré twists to conformal, internal, and supersymmetric twists.
  • The R-unimodularity condition matches the unimodularity condition on classical r-matrices already required for type II supergravity backgrounds of homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations, so the gauge-side consistency condition and the string-side consistency condition coincide.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: since UV/IR mixing is a non-planar phenomenon in Moyal-type theories, the planar equivalence theorem suggests that the planar sector of every R-unimodular twist deformation is free of UV/IR mixing; this inference goes beyond the paper's explicit planar restriction.
  • Beyond the paper: a concrete testable extension would be to compare one-loop planar correlators of a non-F-unimodular but R-unimodular twist against the paper's dressing formula, isolating the effect of the weakened cyclicity condition in a finite calculation.
  • Beyond the paper: because the construction keeps spacetime coordinates commutative and places the non-commutativity in field space, mapping these theories to genuinely non-commutative spacetimes such as κ-Minkowski would require converting active transformations back into passive ones; the paper lists this as future work, and the conversion is a natural next problem.
  • Beyond the paper: the same active-transformation viewpoint, together with a suitable unimodularity condition, may supply the missing gauge-theory construction for q-deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills that would be dual to η-deformed $AdS_5\times S^5$; the paper only raises this as a possibility.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. Borsato and Meier construct non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories via Drinfel'd twists built from symmetry generators of the undeformed theory, realised as active transformations on fields. The active picture ensures that partial derivatives satisfy the ordinary Leibniz rule, which simplifies the definition of star-covariant derivatives. The authors show that cyclicity under integration is equivalent to the R-unimodularity condition S(V)=V, which is weaker than the F-unimodularity condition used in earlier literature, and they prove a planar equivalence theorem: planar Feynman diagrams of the deformed theory have undeformed internal structure, with the twist acting only on external legs. The paper also classifies possible twists, with particular attention to N=4 super Yang-Mills and homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations of AdS5 x S5. The central technical derivations in Sections 3.1.1, 4.4 and 5.2 appear internally consistent, but the advertised scope for N=4 is limited by the off-shell linear supersymmetry assumption of Section 2.3.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes several useful contributions: it clarifies the minimal unimodularity condition required for gauge-invariant star deformations, provides a clean formulation of twist deformations that bypasses the usual Leibniz-rule obstructions, and extends the planar equivalence theorem to a broad class of twists. The proof of the planar equivalence theorem is detailed and carefully structured, and the paper correctly identifies the role of the R-unimodularity condition in preserving cyclicity. The classification section offers a useful map of possible twists. The main limitation is that the off-shell linear realisation assumption restricts the supersymmetric twists to those involving at most N=2 supercharges, so the rank-6 extended Jordanian deformations that would be needed for the full AdS/CFT application are not covered; this limitation is acknowledged by the authors in Section 5.2.5 but is not matched in the Introduction's claims.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 1; see also Sections 2.3, 5.2.5, 6.2.3] The Introduction states that the paper 'provide[s] the method to construct all the non-commutative deformations of N=4 super Yang-Mills with twists that are built out of linearly-realised symmetries.' This is stronger than what the construction delivers. Since Section 2.3 assumes that every supercharge used in the twist is linearly and off-shell realized (eq. (2.16)), and since N=4 super Yang-Mills has no off-shell superspace, only supercharges belonging to an N≤2 off-shell subalgebra can be used. In particular, the rank-6 extended Jordanian r-matrices of Section 6.2.3, which require the full N=4 algebra, are excluded from the construction even though they are among the homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations that motivate the AdS/CFT application. The authors do acknowledge this in Section 5.2.5, but the Introduction and the abstract-level claims should carry the same qualification; otherwise the advertised scope is misleading. Please rephrase the claim to specify 'twists built out of symmetry generators that can be linearly and off-shell realised, which for N=4 SYM restricts to at most N=2 supercharges.'
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2/3.3] The notational difference between the hatted star product (3.34), defined using \hat{F}, and the standard star product (3.38) with the inverse twist in the Lie-derivative picture is a common source of confusion; please add a short paragraph early in Section 3.3 that explicitly states the dictionary between the two conventions, including the role of the antipode in (3.42).
  2. [Section 4.4, Eq. (4.21)] In the chain of equalities in Eq. (4.21), the object S(\hat{V}^{-1}) is introduced without definition; since (3.3) defines V^{-1} directly, please spell out that S(\hat{V}^{-1}) is the antipode of the operator \hat{V}^{-1} and state which identity from Appendix C is used.
  3. [Section 5.2.2, Eq. (5.32)] The notation in Eq. (5.32) uses ϕ_1(x) and ϕ_1(y) for fields in two different vertices, which is confusing; please rename the second set of fields (e.g., ψ_i(y)) to avoid the clash.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Central claims (R-unimodularity equals cyclicity under integration, and the planar equivalence theorem) are proven internally from stated definitions and assumptions; self-citations provide background but do not carry the argument.

full rationale

This is a construction paper whose central results are derived, not assumed, and no circular step reduces a claim to its own input. (1) The R-unimodularity condition is introduced algebraically in Section 3.1.1 from the requirement that the Drinfel'd element be trivial, u_F = 1, giving S(V) = V (eqs 3.13-3.14), with V defined purely from the twist, V = m(S⊗1)F^{-1} (eq 3.16). Cyclicity under integration is defined independently in Section 4.4 (eq 4.20) and then proven equivalent to S(V̂) = V̂ (eqs 4.21-4.23) using the integration-by-parts identity (B.13) and the symmetry-invariance of the seed Lagrangian. The two notions are not conflated: the equivalence is a theorem with a displayed proof. (2) The planar equivalence theorem is proven in Section 5.2 from the twist axioms, the R-unimodularity condition, and the Ward-identity invariance of the undeformed propagator (eqs 5.13-5.15, 5.20); the theorem's conclusion, that planar diagrams retain the undeformed internal structure with the twist acting only on external legs (eq 5.53), is not among the proof's inputs. The derivation is self-contained and follows the proof strategy of [52] rather than importing its conclusion. (3) There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions; the construction is exact and the examples (abelian equivalent twist of eq 3.25, extended Jordanian twist of eqs 3.31-3.32) concretely demonstrate cases where F-unimodularity fails yet R-unimodularity holds. (4) Self-citations exist but are not load-bearing: [52] (Meier & van Tongeren) supplies the Poincaré-level planar equivalence starting point, [64] (Borsato & Meier) the scale-symmetry twist comparison, and [72], [74] (Borsato-Wulff, Borsato-Driezen) the r-matrix classifications used in the explicitly 'rough' Section 6, which disclaims completeness. These are independently published, checkable classifications and the paper proves its own generalisations; none of the cited results replaces a proof needed for the central claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants appear. The deformation parameter xi and the r-matrix coefficients are free choices that classify the construction, not numbers tuned to match data or to force the theorems; the proofs hold for arbitrary values. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are postulated. The R-unimodularity condition is a derived criterion on the twist, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The symmetries used to construct the twist are exact symmetries of the undeformed seed action, classically and at the quantum level, i.e. without anomalies.
    Invoked in Section 4.1 ('in section 5 we will have to assume that the symmetries appearing in the twist still hold at the quantum level, i.e. there are no anomalies') and used in the Ward identities (5.12) that anchor the planar equivalence proof.
  • domain assumption Supercharges entering the twists act linearly and off-shell on the undeformed field content, Q Phi = Q^A_B Phi^B, with auxiliary fields retained and gauge degrees of freedom not fixed.
    Section 2.3, eq (2.16) and the paragraph stating 'we will assume that the extra gauge degrees of freedom have not been gauge fixed'. This is the boundary of the construction: N=4 SYM has no off-shell superspace, so twists requiring more than two supercharges are excluded (Section 5.2.5).
  • standard math Standard Hopf algebra and Drinfel'd twist machinery: cocycle condition (3.1), counit normalization, the correspondence between r-matrices and twist equivalence classes, and the equivalence relation (3.5).
    Section 3.1 and Appendix C; background imported from the literature without proof.
  • domain assumption The free propagator is invariant under every symmetry generator used in the twist, implemented via Weyl-Lie derivatives carrying classical scaling weights.
    Eq (5.14), with scaling dimensions treated classically as argued in Section 5.2.5; a quantum-corrected dimension would break the Ward identity used to move twists across propagator legs.
  • domain assumption Integrals of total derivatives vanish, and only planar diagrams are considered.
    Section 4.4 ('we are assuming, as usual, that integrals of total derivatives are zero') and the end of Section 5.2.3, where non-planar diagrams are excluded from the equivalence theorem; UV/IR mixing is set aside in the Introduction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A new perspective on non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4KVB7VOJ

@misc{pith2026260804097,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A new perspective on non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4KVB7VOJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04097}
}
abstract

We construct non-commutative deformations of field and gauge theories based on star-products implemented by Drinfel'd twists. We are able to encompass a large family of twists, including those built out of conformal symmetries and supersymmetries. The main idea behind our construction is to work with twists constructed from symmetries of the undeformed theory, that are realised as active symmetry transformations. We argue that our construction amounts to a reformulation of known deformations of gauge theories, and that it significantly extends the range of applicable examples. To ensure consistency with gauge invariance, we also identify a unimodularity condition that is weaker than the one that is normally employed in the literature, so that we can apply twists that would otherwise be left out. Finally, we also prove a planar equivalence theorem stating that the Feynman diagrams of the deformed theories retain an undeformed internal structure, with the twist acting only on their external legs. All these results are important to identify and work with deformations of $\mathcal N=4$ super Yang-Mills that are proposed to be dual to homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations of the $AdS_5\times S^5$ superstring, but the applicability of our construction and results goes beyond that.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04097 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Different realisations of twist deformations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Possible realisations of N = 1 supersymmetric field theories. ψα complemented by the auxiliary field F) the off-shell supersymmetry transformations are3 Qαϕ = −i √ 2ψα, Qαψβ = i √ 2ϵαβF, Q¯ α˙ ψα = √ 2(σ µ )α α˙ ∂µϕ, Q¯ α˙ F = − √ 2¯σ µαα˙ ∂µψα. (2.15) In general, we may repackage all physical and auxiliary fields into just one set ΦA, where A is the index keeping track of each of them. We have then that the supersy… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Feynman rules representing the Drinfel’d twist. All twists appearing in a given [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Feynman rules for the deformed theory. The star products entering at a given [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Adding a vertex to an existing planar diagram. On the left-hand-side of the equation, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Invariance of the deformed diagram. A given element of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cyclicity of the deformed diagram. A given orientation of the star product of the new [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Contracting two neighbouring fields in a given planar Feynman diagram leads to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [17]

    Noncommutative D=4 gravity coupled to fermions

    P. Aschieri and L. Castellani,“Noncommutative D=4 gravity coupled to fermions”, JHEP 0906, 086 (2009),arxiv:0902.3817

    arXiv 2009

  2. [54]

    Cabello Gil and S

    J. Cabello Gil and S. van Tongeren, to appear

    work page

  3. [1]

    Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces

    R. J. Szabo,“Quantum field theory on noncommutative spaces”,Phys. Rept. 378, 207 (2003), hep-th/0109162

    arXiv 2003

  4. [2]

    Noncommutative field theory

    M. R. Douglas and N. A. Nekrasov,“Noncommutative field theory”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 977 (2001),hep-th/0106048

    arXiv 2001

  5. [3]

    Noncommutative Geometry of Gravity, Strings and Fields: A Panoramic Overview

    R. J. Szabo,“Noncommutative Geometry of Gravity, Strings and Fields: A Panoramic Overview”, arxiv:2511.22672

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    Gauge theories on quantum spaces

    K. Hersent, P. Mathieu and J.-C. Wallet,“Gauge theories on quantum spaces”, Phys. Rept. 1014, 1 (2023),arxiv:2210.11890

    arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    Introduction to noncommutative field and gauge theory

    P. Vitale, M. Adamo, R. Dekhil and D. Fern´ andez-Silvestre,“Introduction to noncommutative field and gauge theory”,PoS QG-MMSchools, 007 (2024),arxiv:2309.17369

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [6]

    Noncommutative Gauge Theories: Yang-Mills extensions and beyond - An overview

    J.-C. Wallet,“Noncommutative Gauge Theories: Yang-Mills extensions and beyond - An overview”,arxiv:2510.19112

    arXiv

Show all 80 references
  1. [7]

    Quantized space-time

    H. S. Snyder,“Quantized space-time”,Phys. Rev. 71, 38 (1947)

    1947

  2. [8]

    Noncommutative perturbative dynamics

    S. Minwalla, M. Van Raamsdonk and N. Seiberg,“Noncommutative perturbative dynamics”, JHEP 0002, 020 (2000),hep-th/9912072

    2000 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Braided symmetries in noncommutative field theory

    G. Giotopoulos and R. J. Szabo,“Braided symmetries in noncommutative field theory”, J. Phys. A 55, 353001 (2022),arxiv:2112.00541

    2022 arXiv

  4. [10]

    On constant quasi-classical solutions of the Yang-Baxter quantum equation

    V. Drinfel’d,“On constant quasi-classical solutions of the Yang-Baxter quantum equation ”, Sov. Math. Dokl. 28, 667 (1983)

    1983

  5. [11]

    Noncommutative geometry and gravity

    P. Aschieri, M. Dimitrijevic, F. Meyer and J. Wess,“Noncommutative geometry and gravity”, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 1883 (2006),hep-th/0510059

    2006 arXiv

  6. [12]

    A Twisted look on kappa-Minkowski: U(1) gauge theory

    M. Dimitrijevic and L. Jonke,“A Twisted look on kappa-Minkowski: U(1) gauge theory”, JHEP 1112, 080 (2011),arxiv:1107.3475

    2011 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory

    J. E. Moyal,“Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory”,Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 45, 99 (1949)

    1949

  8. [14]

    On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics

    H. J. Groenewold,“On the Principles of elementary quantum mechanics”,Physica 12, 405 (1946)

    1946

  9. [15]

    Integrability in dipole-deformedN= 4super Yang–Mills

    M. Guica, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and K. Zarembo,“Integrability in dipole-deformedN= 4super Yang–Mills”,J. Phys. A A50, 394001 (2017),arxiv:1706.07957

    2017 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Quadratic Twist-Noncommutative Gauge Theory

    T. Meier and S. J. van Tongeren,“Quadratic Twist-Noncommutative Gauge Theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121603 (2023),arxiv:2301.08757

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    A Gravity theory on noncommutative spaces

    P. Aschieri, C. Blohmann, M. Dimitrijevic, F. Meyer, P. Schupp and J. Wess,“A Gravity theory on noncommutative spaces”,Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 3511 (2005),hep-th/0504183

    2005 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Differential calculus and gauge transformations on a deformed space

    J. Wess,“Differential calculus and gauge transformations on a deformed space”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 39, 1121 (2007),hep-th/0607251

    2007 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Gauge Theory on Twistedκ-Minkowski: Old Problems and Possible Solutions

    M. Dimitrijevic, L. Jonke and A. Pachol,“Gauge Theory on Twistedκ-Minkowski: Old Problems and Possible Solutions”,SIGMA 10, 063 (2014),arxiv:1403.1857

    2014 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview

    N. Beisert et al.,“Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview”,Lett. Math. Phys. 99, 3 (2012), arxiv:1012.3982

    2012 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Hidden symmetries of the AdS 5×S5 superstring

    I. Bena, J. Polchinski and R. Roiban,“Hidden symmetries of the AdS 5×S5 superstring”, Phys. Rev. D D69, 046002 (2004),hep-th/0305116. 67

    2004 arXiv

  16. [23]

    The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills

    J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,“The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills”, JHEP 0303, 013 (2003),hep-th/0212208

    2003 arXiv

  17. [24]

    The su(2|2)dynamic S-matrix

    N. Beisert,“The su(2|2)dynamic S-matrix”,Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 12, 945 (2008), hep-th/0511082

    2008 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal

    D. Bombardelli, D. Fioravanti and R. Tateo,“Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for planar AdS/CFT: A Proposal”,J. Phys. A A42, 375401 (2009),arxiv:0902.3930

    2009 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,“Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz for the AdS(5) x S(5) Mirror Model”, JHEP 0905, 068 (2009),arxiv:0903.0141

    2009 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov and P. Vieira,“Exact Spectrum of Anomalous Dimensions of Planar N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 131601 (2009),arxiv:0901.3753

    2009 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Quantum Spectral Curve for PlanarN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,“Quantum Spectral Curve for PlanarN= 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 011602 (2014),arxiv:1305.1939

    2014 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality

    C. Klimcik,“Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality”,JHEP 0212, 051 (2002), hep-th/0210095

    2002 arXiv

  23. [30]

    On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model

    C. Klimcik,“On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model”,J. Math. Phys. 50, 043508 (2009), arxiv:0802.3518

    2009 arXiv

  24. [31]

    An integrable deformation of the AdS 5×S5 superstring action

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo,“An integrable deformation of the AdS 5×S5 superstring action”,Phys.Rev.Lett. 112, 051601 (2014),arxiv:1309.5850

    2014 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5xS5 superstring

    I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5xS5 superstring”,JHEP 1404, 153 (2014),arxiv:1401.4855

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Integrability of classical strings dual for noncommutative gauge theories

    T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Integrability of classical strings dual for noncommutative gauge theories”,JHEP 1406, 163 (2014),arxiv:1404.3657

    2014 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Yang–Baxter sigma models based on the CYBE

    T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida,“Yang–Baxter sigma models based on the CYBE”, Nucl. Phys. B B893, 287 (2015),arxiv:1501.03665

    2015 arXiv

  28. [35]

    On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 superstring

    S. J. van Tongeren,“On classical Yang-Baxter based deformations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 superstring”, JHEP 1506, 048 (2015),arxiv:1504.05516

    2015 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Beauty and the twist: The Bethe ansatz for twisted N=4 SYM

    N. Beisert and R. Roiban,“Beauty and the twist: The Bethe ansatz for twisted N=4 SYM”, JHEP 0508, 039 (2005),hep-th/0505187

    2005 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Integrability of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring and its deformations

    S. J. van Tongeren,“Integrability of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring and its deformations”, J.Phys. A47, 433001 (2014),arxiv:1310.4854

    2014 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Jordanian deformation of the non-compact andsl 2-invariant XXX−1/2 spin-chain

    R. Borsato and M. G. Fern´ andez,“Jordanian deformation of the non-compact andsl 2-invariant XXX−1/2 spin-chain”,JHEP 2508, 074 (2025),arxiv:2503.24223

    2025 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Jordanian spin chains for twisted strings in AdS5×S5

    S. Driezen and A. Molines,“Jordanian spin chains for twisted strings in AdS5×S5”, Phys. Rev. D 112, 106001 (2025),arxiv:2507.13911

    2025

  33. [40]

    Integrability for the spectrum of Jordanian AdS/CFT

    S. Driezen, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk and A. Molines,“Integrability for the spectrum of Jordanian AdS/CFT”,JHEP 2604, 052 (2026),arxiv:2511.11521

    2026

  34. [41]

    Groenewold-Moyal twists, integrable spin-chains and AdS/CFT

    R. Borsato and M. Garc ´ ıa Fern´ andez,“Groenewold-Moyal twists, integrable spin-chains and AdS/CFT”,arxiv:2604.07291

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    On Yang–Baxter models, twist operators, and boundary conditions

    S. J. Van Tongeren,“On Yang–Baxter models, twist operators, and boundary conditions”, J. Phys. A 51, 305401 (2018),arxiv:1804.05680

    2018 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as undeformed yet twisted models

    R. Borsato, S. Driezen and J. L. Miramontes,“Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as undeformed yet twisted models”,JHEP 2204, 053 (2022),arxiv:2112.12025. 68

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Deforming field theories withU(1)×U(1)global symmetry and their gravity duals

    O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena,“Deforming field theories withU(1)×U(1)global symmetry and their gravity duals”,JHEP 0505, 033 (2005),hep-th/0502086

    2005 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler,“Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory”,Nucl. Phys. B 447, 95 (1995),hep-th/9503121

    1995 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Large N limit of noncommutative gauge theories

    J. M. Maldacena and J. G. Russo,“Large N limit of noncommutative gauge theories”, JHEP 9909, 025 (1999),hep-th/9908134

    1999 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Noncommutative Yang-Mills and the AdS / CFT correspondence

    A. Hashimoto and N. Itzhaki,“Noncommutative Yang-Mills and the AdS / CFT correspondence”, Phys. Lett. B B465, 142 (1999),hep-th/9907166

    1999 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory

    S. J. van Tongeren,“Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory”,Nucl. Phys. B B904, 148 (2016),arxiv:1506.01023

    2016 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Almost abelian twists and AdS/CFT

    S. J. van Tongeren,“Almost abelian twists and AdS/CFT”,Phys. Lett. B B765, 344 (2017), arxiv:1610.05677

    2017 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Yang-Baxterσ-models, conformal twists, and noncommutative Yang-Mills theory

    T. Araujo, I. Bakhmatov, E. O. Colg´ ain, J. Sakamoto, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and K. Yoshida, “Yang-Baxterσ-models, conformal twists, and noncommutative Yang-Mills theory”, Phys. Rev. D D95, 105006 (2017),arxiv:1702.02861

    2017 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Conformal twists, Yang–Baxterσ-models & holographic noncommutativity

    T. Araujo, I. Bakhmatov, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, J.-i. Sakamoto, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and K. Yoshida, “Conformal twists, Yang–Baxterσ-models & holographic noncommutativity”, J. Phys. A 51, 235401 (2018),arxiv:1705.02063

    2018 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Gauge theory on twist-noncommutative spaces

    T. Meier and S. J. van Tongeren,“Gauge theory on twist-noncommutative spaces”, JHEP 2312, 045 (2023),arxiv:2305.15470

    2023 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Divergencies in a field theory on quantum space

    T. Filk,“Divergencies in a field theory on quantum space”,Physics Letters B 376, 53 (1996), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939600024X

    1996

  47. [55]

    Harmonic superspace

    A. S. Galperin, E. A. Ivanov, V. I. Ogievetsky and E. S. Sokatchev,“Harmonic superspace”, Cambridge University Press (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Constant quasiclassical solutions of the Yang–Baxter quantum equation

    V. G. Drinfeld,“Constant quasiclassical solutions of the Yang–Baxter quantum equation ”, in: “Doklady Akademii Nauk”, 531–535p

  49. [57]

    Bialgebra actions, twists, and universal deformation formulas

    A. Giaquinto and J. J. Zhang,“Bialgebra actions, twists, and universal deformation formulas”, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 128, 133 (1998),hep-th/9411140

    1998 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Twist Deformations of Quantum Integrable Spin Chains

    P. Kulish,“Twist Deformations of Quantum Integrable Spin Chains”, in:“Noncommutative Spacetimes: Symmetries in Noncommutative Geometry and Field Theory”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2009), Berlin, Heidelberg, 167–190p, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89793-4 9

    2009 doi

  51. [59]

    Chains of extended Jordanian twists for Lie superalgebras

    V. N. Tolstoy,“Chains of extended Jordanian twists for Lie superalgebras”,math/0402433, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0402433

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation

    V. G. Drinfeld,“Hopf algebras and the quantum Yang-Baxter equation”, Sov. Math. Dokl. 32, 254 (1985)

    1985

  53. [61]

    Twisted gauge theories

    P. Aschieri, M. Dimitrijevic, F. Meyer, S. Schraml and J. Wess,“Twisted gauge theories”, Lett. Math. Phys. 78, 61 (2006),hep-th/0603024

    2006 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Twist to close

    D. V. Vassilevich,“Twist to close”,Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21, 1279 (2006),hep-th/0602185

    2006 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1

    M. Kontsevich,“Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. 1.”, Lett. Math. Phys. 66, 157 (2003),q-alg/9709040. 69

    2003 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Non-commutative deformations of gauge theories via Drinfel’d twists of the scale symmetry

    R. Borsato and T. Meier,“Non-commutative deformations of gauge theories via Drinfel’d twists of the scale symmetry”,arxiv:2512.04162

  57. [65]

    Noncommutative spacetimes: Symmetries in noncommutative geometry and field theory

    P. Aschieri, M. Dimitrijevic, P. Kulish, F. Lizzi and J. Wess,“Noncommutative spacetimes: Symmetries in noncommutative geometry and field theory”

  58. [66]

    Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations

    D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren,“Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations”, Nucl. Phys. B B915, 184 (2017),arxiv:1608.08504

    2017 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Space-time noncommutative field theories and unitarity

    J. Gomis and T. Mehen,“Space-time noncommutative field theories and unitarity”, Nucl. Phys. B 591, 265 (2000),hep-th/0005129

    2000 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Space-time noncommutativity and causality

    N. Seiberg, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas,“Space-time noncommutativity and causality”, JHEP 0006, 044 (2000),hep-th/0005015

    2000 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Integrable Spin Chains in Twisted Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory

    T. Meier and S. J. van Tongeren,“Integrable Spin Chains in Twisted Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 051601 (2026),arxiv:2507.18626

    2026

  62. [70]

    Noncommutative superspace, N = 1/2 supersymmetry, field theory and string theory

    N. Seiberg,“Noncommutative superspace, N = 1/2 supersymmetry, field theory and string theory”, JHEP 0306, 010 (2003),hep-th/0305248

    2003 arXiv

  63. [71]

    New twisted quantum deformations of D=4 super-Poincare algebra

    A. Borowiec, J. Lukierski and V. N. Tolstoy,“New twisted quantum deformations of D=4 super-Poincare algebra”,arxiv:0803.4167, in:“7th International Workshop on Supersymmetries and Quantum Symmetries”, 205–216p

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Target space supergeometry ofηandλ-deformed strings

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff,“Target space supergeometry ofηandλ-deformed strings”, JHEP 1610, 045 (2016),arxiv:1608.03570

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Unimodular jordanian deformations of integrable superstrings

    S. J. van Tongeren,“Unimodular jordanian deformations of integrable superstrings”, SciPost Phys. 7, 011 (2019),arxiv:1904.08892

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    All Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring

    R. Borsato and S. Driezen,“All Jordanian deformations of theAdS 5 ×S 5 superstring”, SciPost Phys. 14, 160 (2023),arxiv:2212.11269

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Trivial solutions of generalized supergravity vs non-abelian T-duality anomaly

    L. Wulff,“Trivial solutions of generalized supergravity vs non-abelian T-duality anomaly”, Phys. Lett. B781, 417 (2018),arxiv:1803.07391

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Relaxing unimodularity for Yang-Baxter deformed strings

    S. Hronek and L. Wulff,“Relaxing unimodularity for Yang-Baxter deformed strings”, JHEP 2010, 065 (2020),arxiv:2007.15663

    2020 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Observables of noncommutative gauge theories

    D. J. Gross, A. Hashimoto and N. Itzhaki,“Observables of noncommutative gauge theories”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4, 893 (2000),hep-th/0008075

    2000 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Introduction to doubly special relativity

    J. Kowalski-Glikman,“Introduction to doubly special relativity”,Lect. Notes Phys. 669, 131 (2005), hep-th/0405273

    2005 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Supergravity backgrounds of theη-deformed AdS 2 ×S 2 ×T 6 and AdS5 ×S 5 superstrings

    B. Hoare and F. K. Seibold,“Supergravity backgrounds of theη-deformed AdS 2 ×S 2 ×T 6 and AdS5 ×S 5 superstrings”,JHEP 1901, 125 (2019),arxiv:1811.07841

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Supergravity

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,“Supergravity”, Cambridge Univ. Press (2012), Cambridge, UK. 70

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.