Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods

Amitayus Banik; Kimmo Kainulainen

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 134 references

Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a thermal effective potential from renormalized 2PI actions that is valid at all temperatures and shows the choice of resummation can change predicted phase-transition strengths and gravitational wave spectra by orders…

desk verdict Solid 2PI-Hartree renormalization for two-field mixing with a careful physical parameter connection; the main open questions are about the assumed divergence structure and the lack of reproducible numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04102 v1 pith:VWMXJJEF submitted 2026-08-04 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Amitayus Banik , Kimmo Kainulainen This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th

keywords thermalresummationtwo-particleirreducibleeffectiveactionHartreeapproximationfinite-temperaturepotentialcosmologicalphasetransitionsgravitationalwavesrenormalizationgapequation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to give cosmological first-order phase transitions a thermal resummation that does not rely on the high-temperature expansion. Working with two mixing real scalar fields, it renormalizes the two-particle-irreducible (2PI) effective action in the Hartree approximation and connects the auxiliary renormalized parameters to physical masses and couplings. The result is the Hartree-resummed finite-temperature effective potential of Eq. (5.3), which is scale invariant and valid from high to low temperature. The authors then show that this potential can predict transition strengths, and hence gravitational wave amplitudes, that differ by orders of magnitude from the standard ring and Parwani resummations, in either direction depending on the benchmark.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Hartree-resummed effective potential $V_{\rm HT}(\varphi,\chi;T)$ of Eq. (5.3): a vacuum one-loop-type piece evaluated with thermally corrected gap masses plus the resummed thermal integrals $J$ and $I$. The gap equation (3.22) for the mass matrix $m^2_{\alpha\beta}$, solved self-consistently with the local correlation functions, is what makes the resummation consistent at all temperatures. The renormalization rests on the cancellation-of-subdivergences conditions (3.24)-(3.25), which assume the sole divergence is $m^2_{\alpha\beta}\Delta_\epsilon$ and thereby fix the counterterms. Finally, the connection between auxiliary MS-parameters and physical parameters is established by demanding that the second and fourth derivatives of the potential at the minimum reproduce the $p^2=0$ masses $\hat m^2_{\alpha\beta}$ and zero-momentum couplings $\hat\lambda_{\alpha\beta}$.

What would settle it

Compute $V_{\rm HT}(\varphi,\chi;T)$ for a fixed physical parameter set at two widely separated renormalization scales, say $Q=100$ GeV and $Q=10^6$ GeV; if the potential changes at any field value or temperature, the claimed exact scale invariance is false. A second, sharper test is to include the sunset diagram in the 2PI expansion and check whether a divergence not of the form $m^2_{\alpha\beta}\Delta_\epsilon$ appears; such a divergence would show that the Hartree-level cancellation does not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a fully renormalized 2PI Hartree treatment supplies a consistent, self-consistent thermal resummation for a multi-field scalar model: thermal masses are obtained as solutions of the gap equation (3.22), the effective potential (5.3) is built from those masses, and no high-temperature approximation enters. The same renormalization procedure that removes ultraviolet divergences in vacuum also removes them at finite temperature, because the only divergent part of the local correlation function is $m^2_{\alpha\beta}\Delta_\epsilon$ and the cancellation conditions (3.24)-(3.25) make every $n$-point function finite. The potential is exactly scale invariant, and the auxiliary MS-parameters are tied to the physical $p^2=0$ masses and to the zero-momentum four-point functions of the theory. When applied to one- and two-step phase transitions, the Hartree potential typically, but not always, predicts the strongest transitions, and the resulting gravitational wave spectrum can be larger by up to four orders of magnitude than the Parwani prediction.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every ultraviolet divergence in the local propagators has exactly the form $m^2_{\alpha\beta}\Delta_\epsilon$; if additional divergence structures exist beyond the Hartree level, the cancellation conditions (3.23)-(3.25) would not render the potential finite and the central construction collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If $V_{\rm HT}$ is the correct all-temperature potential, ring-resummed predictions for transition strength and gravitational waves are unreliable whenever $T$ is not much larger than the relevant masses.
Parwani-type resummation captures qualitatively similar physics because it also thermalizes the vacuum part, but its non-self-consistent masses introduce uncontrolled errors near $T\sim m$.
A stronger, or weaker, Hartree transition directly translates into a larger, or smaller, gravitational wave amplitude, by up to four orders of magnitude in the benchmarks studied, so phenomenological scans should include this scheme.
The renormalization and parameter-matching procedure extends to models with more scalar fields, such as singlet extensions of the Standard Model, making the method applicable to realistic electroweak phase transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next test is to push the 2PI expansion beyond Hartree: if a next-to-leading-order sunset-type calculation shifts the $p^2=0$ masses by a large amount, the Hartree prediction of phase-transition strength would need revision.
Because the Hartree potential is scale invariant by construction, using it should reduce the renormalization-scale uncertainty that plagues standard perturbative phase-transition predictions; this could be checked directly by repeating the benchmarks at different renormalization scales $Q$.
The same framework could be used to compute bubble-wall velocities and baryogenesis observables in parameter regions where the high-temperature expansion is invalid, exactly where standard schemes are least trustworthy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a serious look. The genuinely new thing is the renormalized 2PI-Hartree effective potential for two explicitly mixing scalars, with a physical parameter matching that goes beyond the single-field and O(N) cases. The derivation is detailed and mostly self-contained: the split of local correlation functions, the cancellation of subdivergences, the running of the auxiliary MS couplings, and the proof of scale invariance are all laid out carefully. The connection to physical four-point functions via fourth derivatives of the potential is a practical step that will be useful for phenomenology. Appendix A, with the wave-function renormalization factors for the classical fields, is a real addition. The numerical comparison with ring and Parwani schemes makes the point that the choice of resummation can change PT strength and GW amplitude by orders of magnitude, which is worth knowing even if the model is a toy.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. First, the divergence structure in Eq. (3.21) — that all local divergences have the form m^2_alpha beta Delta_epsilon — is assumed rather than proved in this paper. The stress-test note asks whether additional subdivergences could appear for the two-field case. My reading is that this is a standard result for the 2PI-Hartree approximation in multicomponent scalar models, and the paper cites the relevant work (Fejos, Patkos, Szep). But because the paper's novelty rests on the mixing, a referee should ask for a more explicit argument or a precise citation that covers the two-field case with off-diagonal propagators. Second, there is no code or data release; the numerical results (gap equations, parameter matching, bounce actions) are described but not independently checkable. For a methods paper, that is a significant omission. Third, the two-step benchmark uses different lambda_phi_chi for the Hartree and Parwani runs because the parameter windows do not overlap, so the comparison is not one-to-one. The authors are upfront about this, but it weakens the quantitative conclusions. Finally, 'valid for all temperatures' is a bit strong for a Hartree truncation; within the truncation it's fine, but the paper should hedge.

If you are in the phase-transition or thermal-field-theory business, this is worth your time. I would send it to a competent referee — the technical core is substantial and the flaws are fixable in revision. I would not desk-reject it.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops the 2PI Hartree approximation for a model with two mixing real scalar fields, renormalizing the 2PI effective action through the cancellation-of-subdivergences method and connecting auxiliary MS parameters to physical p^2=0 masses and fourth derivatives of the potential. It derives a vacuum effective potential (4.5) and a finite-temperature version (5.3), argued to be scale-invariant and free of high-temperature approximations. Using benchmark points, it compares one- and two-step phase transitions and gravitational wave spectra with the ring and Parwani resummation schemes. The central claim is that the Hartree potential is self-consistent, valid for all temperatures, and can change predicted transition strengths and gravitational wave amplitudes by orders of magnitude relative to conventional schemes.

Significance. If the renormalization proof holds, this is a valuable methodological contribution: it extends 2PI renormalization to the multi-field mixing case, gives a concrete physical-parameter mapping, and provides a resummation scheme for cosmological phase transitions that does not rely on the high-temperature expansion. The explicit scale-invariance proof in Appendix B, the analytical derivative formulas in Appendix C, and the bounce/GW numerical implementation are substantial strengths. The main uncertainties are the completeness of the assumed divergence structure in Eq. (3.21), which is stated rather than proven, and the fact that the two-step numerical comparison uses different λφχ values for the two schemes. These issues prevent acceptance in the present form.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3.2.1, Eqs. (3.21)–(3.25)] The UV finiteness of VHT rests on the assertion that the only divergence in the local correlation functions is m^2_{αβ}Δε. This is demonstrated for constant fields in Eqs. (3.17)–(3.20), and then asserted to hold for arbitrary field configurations and for the two-field mixing case. The text itself says 'if the theory is to be renormalizable' (Sec. 3.2), which indicates this is an assumption rather than a derivation. In a space-dependent background the resummed propagator can develop additional subdivergences not of the form m^2_{αβ}Δε, for instance terms involving derivatives of m^2 or of the fields, and the operator structure in Appendix A introduces further opportunities for such terms. If any such divergence exists, the cancellation conditions (3.23)–(3.25) are incomplete and the potential (4.5) and its thermal extension (5.3) would retain 1/ε poles. Please provide a proof of completeness of the divergence structure for the two-field Hartree case, or explicitly restrict the claims to constant backgrounds and qualify the broader renormalizability statement.
[Sec. 5.1 and Abstract] The statement that the Hartree potential (5.3) is 'valid for all temperatures' is stronger than what the Hartree truncation supports. The scheme avoids the high-temperature expansion and retains Boltzmann suppression, which is a genuine improvement. However, the Hartree approximation is the leading-order 2PI truncation, and the paper provides no estimate of the neglected higher-order 2PI diagrams or of the resulting accuracy of thermodynamic quantities. I recommend replacing 'valid for all temperatures' with a more guarded formulation, such as 'free of the high-temperature expansion within the Hartree truncation', unless an explicit error estimate or convergence test is added.
[Sec. 6.2, Table 3] The two-step comparison is not performed at the same physical input parameters. The Parwani case uses λφχ = 1.95 while the Hartree case uses λφχ = 1.92, and the text states that for λφχ = 1.92 the Parwani potential gives a one-step transition. Consequently, the differences in T_n, α*, β/H*, and the GW spectra in Figs. 8 and 9 may reflect the change in λφχ rather than the difference in resummation scheme. The authors acknowledge this in words, but the conclusion that the Hartree potential 'tends to predict a much stronger transition' in the two-step scenario is not established by a controlled comparison. Please either find overlapping parameter regions where both schemes give two-step transitions, or present the case as an illustration with different physical inputs and avoid drawing scheme-dependent conclusions from it.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.31b)] In Eq. (3.31b), the term displayed as (λ(4)φχ + δ(4)λφχ)ϕ^2 appears to be a typo for φ^2 or χ^2; please correct the notation for consistency with the surrounding equations.
[Tables 1–3] The column headers list 'λ(0)(m1)' twice; the last entry should be explicitly labelled as ¯λ(0)φχ (or ¯λ(0)φχ evaluated at the indicated scale) to avoid ambiguity.
[Sec. 4.1, around Eq. (4.15)] The numerical inversion of the hatted couplings via a guessed λ(4g) and repeated solution of (4.14c) would benefit from a statement of the convergence criterion and, if available, an estimate of the numerical uncertainty; the discontinuous jumps of the global minimum shown in Fig. 3 suggest that such robustness information is relevant.
[Appendix A, final paragraph] The final paragraph speculates about field- and temperature-dependent wave-function renormalization factors that are not used elsewhere in the paper; consider moving this discussion to the conclusions or removing it to keep the appendix focused on the quantities actually employed.
[Secs. 5.3 and 6.1] The bounce action (5.12) uses constant Zα,2 factors evaluated at the vacuum minimum, while Appendix A derives them at that point; please state this explicitly in Sec. 5.3 so that the reader is not left to infer it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 2PI-Hartree potential and its thermal extension are derived from the stated truncation and renormalization conditions, with physical parameters fixed by matching conditions rather than fitted to the predicted phase-transition outputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The auxiliary mass matrix is defined by the gap equations (3.22c), with counterterms fixed by the cancellation-of-subdivergences conditions (3.24) and (3.25). The physical couplings are introduced by matching fourth derivatives of the potential (4.15) to given one-loop-defined couplings (6.1), which is a renormalization-condition choice; the phase-transition observables (critical temperature, nucleation temperature, bounce action, transition strength, gravitational-wave amplitude) are not among the matched inputs. The finite-temperature potential (5.3) is obtained by solving the thermal gap equation and inserting the resulting thermal masses into the renormalized vacuum potential: this is a self-consistency equation, not a logical circularity. The scale invariance of the Hartree potential is proved in Appendix B rather than assumed. Self-citations to Refs. [56] and [76] and citations of the external 2PI-renormalization literature [64,65,82] support the method, but the mixing renormalization and the effective potential are derived in the present paper. The unproven divergence-structure assumption in Eq. (3.21) is a substantive correctness risk if additional subdivergences exist, but it is an assumption about renormalizability, not a reduction of the predictions to the inputs. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The auxiliary MS couplings are renormalization bookkeeping, not invented physical entities. The model parameters and physical masses/couplings are inputs chosen for benchmarks.

free parameters (3)

Input mass eigenvalues mhat_1, mhat_2 = (250,125) GeV, (200,425) GeV, (250,115) GeV for the three benchmarks
Chosen by hand to set renormalization conditions and construct one- and two-step phase transition scenarios; they are inputs, not fitted to data.
Physical quartic couplings hatted lambda_phi_phi, hatted lambda_chi_chi, hatted lambda_phi_chi = e.g., (7.1173, 4.0000, 2.9645) for Benchmark 1; see Tables 1 to 3
Defined as fourth derivatives of the one-loop potential at the minimum (Eq. 6.1) and used as fixed inputs for the Hartree potential matching; they are benchmark choices.
Renormalization scale Q0 = 100 GeV or mhat_1/mhat_2 as stated
The potential is scale-invariant by construction (Appendix B), so Q0 is not a physical parameter, but numerical values of auxiliary couplings are quoted at a chosen scale.

assumptions (6)

standard math Dimensional regularization and MS-scheme counterterms can renormalize the 2PI Hartree approximation for this two-field model.
Used throughout Sec. 3; follows Refs. [56, 57, 64, 65, 82].
domain assumption The only UV divergence in local correlation functions is m^2_alpha_beta Delta_epsilon for arbitrary fields and environments.
Assumed in Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.21); the entire renormalization procedure depends on this.
domain assumption The cancellation of subdivergences conditions (3.23)-(3.25) are sufficient to remove all divergences from the field equations and potential.
Sec. 3.2.1 and Sec. 3.3; this is the method from [82] applied to two mixing fields.
domain assumption The auxiliary couplings with indices (0) and (2) can be identified (Eqs. 3.26, 3.27) because wave-function renormalization factors are finite and scale-independent in the Hartree approximation.
Proved in Appendix A, but the proof is intricate; if it failed, the simplified renormalized equations and potential would change.
ad hoc to paper The definitions (3.34b) relating lambda^(4) to other couplings are a consistent choice (Footnote 5 labels them a guess).
These definitions are needed to cast the field equations in tree-level-like form (3.35) and to derive the potential (4.5); their physical content is only confirmed a posteriori.
ad hoc to paper The physical couplings are defined by matching fourth derivatives of the Hartree potential to those of the standard one-loop potential at the minimum (Eq. 6.1).
This defines the benchmark comparison; it is a renormalization scheme choice, not derived from first principles.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VWMXJJEF

@misc{pith2026260804102,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Consistent Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions with 2PI Methods},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VWMXJJEF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04102}
}

read the original abstract

We apply the two-particle irreducible (2PI) formalism as a framework for a consistent thermal resummation in studies of cosmological phase transitions. Considering a model with two mixing real scalar fields, we work within the Hartree approximation and renormalize the 2PI effective action, while introducing a connection to physical parameters. This yields the Hartree-resummed finite-temperature effective potential, which is valid for all temperatures and avoids the limitations of conventional methods based on the high-temperature approximation. With this potential, we study one- and two-step transitions within the model, and compare our results with those obtained using resummation schemes widely employed in the literature. Finally, we evaluate the gravitational wave spectrum generated from first-order phase transitions, demonstrating the impact of the choice of resummation scheme on the predicted spectrum.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[1]

Kuzmin, V.A

V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 36

1985
[2]

Morrissey and M.J

D.E. Morrissey and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis,New J. Phys.14(2012) 125003 [1206.2942]

arXiv 2012
[3]

Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh

A.D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32

1967
[4]

Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon

C.J. Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218(1986) 629. [5]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

arXiv 1986
[6]

Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

arXiv 2019
[7]

Crowder and N.J

J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

arXiv 2005
[8]

Corbin and N.J

V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

arXiv 2006
[9]

Harry, P

G.M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D.A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E.S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4887

2006

Show all 134 references

[10]

Antoniadis et al.,The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background,Mon

J. Antoniadis et al.,The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic gravitational wave background,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.510(2022) 4873 [2201.03980]. [11]IPTAcollaboration,Searching for continuous Gravitational Waves in the second data r...

2022 arXiv
[12]

Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Athron, C

P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu,Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024) 104094 [2305.02357]

2024 arXiv
[14]

Croon and D.J

D. Croon and D.J. Weir,Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions,Contemp. Phys.65 (2024) 75 [2410.21509]. – 43 –

2024
[15]

Dolan and R

L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320

1974
[16]

Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys

S. Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3357

1974
[17]

Kirzhnits and A.D

D.A. Kirzhnits and A.D. Linde,Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories,Annals Phys.101 (1976) 195

1976
[18]

Luscher,Chiral gauge theories revisited,Subnucl

M. Luscher,Chiral gauge theories revisited,Subnucl. Ser.38(2002) 41 [hep-th/0102028]

2002 arXiv
[19]

Linde,Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas,Phys

A.D. Linde,Infrared Problem in Thermodynamics of the Yang-Mills Gas,Phys. Lett. B96 (1980) 289

1980
[20]

Gross, R.D

D.J. Gross, R.D. Pisarski and L.G. Yaffe,QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature,Rev. Mod. Phys.53(1981) 43

1981
[21]

Laine and A

M. Laine and A. Vuorinen,Basics of Thermal Field Theory, vol. 925, Springer (2016), 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9, [1701.01554]

2016 arXiv
[22]

Laine and M

M. Laine and M. Losada,Two loop dimensional reduction and effective potential without temperature expansions,Nucl. Phys. B582(2000) 277 [hep-ph/0003111]

2000 arXiv
[23]

Andersen and M

J.O. Andersen and M. Strickland,Resummation in hot field theories,Annals Phys.317 (2005) 281 [hep-ph/0404164]

2005 arXiv
[24]

Carrington,The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,Phys

M.E. Carrington,The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2933

1992
[25]

Arnold and O

P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa,The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 3546 [hep-ph/9212235]

1993 arXiv
[26]

Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys

R.R. Parwani,Resummation in a hot scalar field theory,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 4695 [hep-ph/9204216]

1992 arXiv
[27]

Farakos, K

K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: Perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 67 [hep-ph/9404201]

1994 arXiv
[28]

Kajantie, M

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model,Nucl. Phys. B458(1996) 90 [hep-ph/9508379]

1996 arXiv
[29]

Braaten and A

E. Braaten and A. Nieto,Effective field theory approach to high temperature thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 6990 [hep-ph/9501375]

1995 arXiv
[30]

Kajantie, M

K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov,The Electroweak phase transition: A Nonperturbative analysis,Nucl. Phys. B466(1996) 189 [hep-lat/9510020]

1996 arXiv
[31]

Ekstedt, P

A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096006 [2405.18349]

2024 arXiv
[32]

Gould and T.V.I

O. Gould and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Perturbative effective field theory expansions for cosmological phase transitions,JHEP01(2024) 048 [2309.01672]

2024 arXiv
[33]

Laine, M

M. Laine, M. Meyer and G. Nardini,Thermal phase transition with full 2-loop effective potential,Nucl. Phys. B920(2017) 565 [1702.07479]

2017 arXiv
[34]

Kainulainen, V

K. Kainulainen, V. Keus, L. Niemi, K. Rummukainen, T.V.I. Tenkanen and V. Vaskonen, – 44 – On the validity of perturbative studies of the electroweak phase transition in the Two Higgs Doublet model,JHEP06(2019) 075 [1904.01329]

2019 arXiv
[35]

Niemi, M.J

L. Niemi, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Xia,Nonperturbative study of the electroweak phase transition in the real scalar singlet extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 115016 [2405.01191]

2024 arXiv
[36]

Chala, J.C

M. Chala, J.C. Criado, L. Gil and J.L. Miras,Higher-order-operator corrections to phase-transition parameters in dimensional reduction,JHEP10(2024) 025 [2406.02667]

2024 arXiv
[37]

Chala and G

M. Chala and G. Guedes,The high-temperature limit of the SM(EFT),JHEP07(2025) 085 [2503.20016]

2025 arXiv
[38]

Chala, L

M. Chala, L. Gil and Z. Ren,Phase transitions in dimensional reduction up to three loops, Chin. Phys. C49(2025) 123105 [2505.14335]

2025 arXiv
[39]

Bernardo, P

F. Bernardo, P. Klose, P. Schicho and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Higher-dimensional operators at finite temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions,JHEP08(2025) 109 [2503.18904]

2025 arXiv
[40]

Kierkla, M

M. Kierkla, M. Lewicki, P. Schicho, D. Schmitt and B. Swiezewska,Theoretical uncertainties in reconstructing model parameters with gravitational waves from supercooled phase transitions,2607.18233

arXiv
[41]

Boyd, D.E

C.G. Boyd, D.E. Brahm and S.D.H. Hsu,Resummation methods at finite temperature: The Tadpole way,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 4963 [hep-ph/9304254]

1993 arXiv
[42]

Funakubo and E

K. Funakubo and E. Senaha,Two-loop effective potential, thermal resummation, and first-order phase transitions: Beyond the high-temperature expansion,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 054003 [1210.1737]

2013 arXiv
[43]

Kneur and M.B

J.L. Kneur and M.B. Pinto,Scale Invariant Resummed Perturbation at Finite Temperatures,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 031601 [1507.03508]

2016 arXiv
[44]

Curtin, P

D. Curtin, P. Meade and H. Ramani,Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 787 [1612.00466]

2018 arXiv
[45]

Curtin, J

D. Curtin, J. Roy and G. White,Gravitational waves and tadpole resummation: Efficient and easy convergence of finite temperature QFT,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 116001 [2211.08218]

2024 arXiv
[46]

Funakubo and E

K. Funakubo and E. Senaha,Renormalization group improvement for thermally resummed effective potential,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L071901 [2307.02153]

2024 arXiv
[47]

Funakubo and E

K. Funakubo and E. Senaha,Refined renormalization group improvement for thermally resummed effective potential,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 056023 [2308.15876]

2024 arXiv
[48]

H. Bahl, M. Carena, A. Ireland and C.E.M. Wagner,Improved thermal resummation for multi-field potentials,JHEP09(2024) 153 [2404.12439]

2024 arXiv
[49]

Bittar, S

P. Bittar, S. Roy and C.E.M. Wagner,Self consistent thermal resummation: a case study of the phase transition in 2HDM,JHEP12(2025) 021 [2504.02024]

2025
[50]

Navarrete, R

P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, K. Sepp¨ anen and T.V.I. Tenkanen,Cosmological phase transitions without high-temperature expansions,JHEP01(2026) 113 [2507.07014]

2026 arXiv
[51]

Klose,Thermal Resummation for Very Strong First-order Phase Transitions, 2607.21252

P. Klose,Thermal Resummation for Very Strong First-order Phase Transitions, 2607.21252

arXiv
[52]

Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys

R. Jackiw,Functional evaluation of the effective potential,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 1686. – 45 –

1974
[53]

Cornwall, R

J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis,Effective Action for Composite Operators, Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2428

1974
[54]

Amelino-Camelia and S.-Y

G. Amelino-Camelia and S.-Y. Pi,Selfconsistent improvement of the finite temperature effective potential,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 2356 [hep-ph/9211211]

1993 arXiv
[55]

Amelino-Camelia,Selfconsistently improved finite temperature effective potential for gauge theories,Phys

G. Amelino-Camelia,Selfconsistently improved finite temperature effective potential for gauge theories,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 2740 [hep-ph/9305222]

1994 arXiv
[56]

Kainulainen and O

K. Kainulainen and O. Koskivaara,Non-equilibrium dynamics of a scalar field with quantum backreaction,JHEP12(2021) 190 [2105.09598]

2021 arXiv
[57]

Berges, S

J. Berges, S. Borsanyi, U. Reinosa and J. Serreau,Nonperturbative renormalization for 2PI effective action techniques,Annals Phys.320(2005) 344 [hep-ph/0503240]

2005 arXiv
[58]

van Hees and J

H. van Hees and J. Knoll,Renormalization in selfconsistent approximations schemes at finite temperature. 1. Theory,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 025010 [hep-ph/0107200]

2002 arXiv
[59]

Van Hees and J

H. Van Hees and J. Knoll,Renormalization of selfconsistent approximation schemes. 2. Applications to the sunset diagram,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 105005 [hep-ph/0111193]

2002 arXiv
[60]

Blaizot, E

J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and U. Reinosa,Renormalizability of Phi derivable approximations in scalar phi**4 theory,Phys. Lett. B568(2003) 160 [hep-ph/0301201]

2003 arXiv
[61]

Blaizot, E

J.-P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and U. Reinosa,Renormalization of Phi derivable approximations in scalar field theories,Nucl. Phys. A736(2004) 149 [hep-ph/0312085]

2004 arXiv
[62]

Carrington, W.-J

M.E. Carrington, W.-J. Fu, D. Pickering and J.W. Pulver,Renormalization group methods and the 2PI effective action,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 025003 [1404.0710]

2015 arXiv
[63]

Carrington, S.A

M.E. Carrington, S.A. Friesen, B.A. Meggison, C.D. Phillips, D. Pickering and K. Sohrabi, 2PI effective theory at next-to-leading order using the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 036005 [1711.09135]

2018 arXiv
[64]

Patkos and Z

A. Patkos and Z. Szep,Counterterm resummation for 2PI-approximation in constant background,Nucl. Phys. A811(2008) 329 [0806.2554]

2008 arXiv
[65]

Patkos and Z

A. Patkos and Z. Szep,Non-perturbative construction of counterterms for 2PI-approximation,Nucl. Phys. A820(2009) 255C [0809.3551]

2009 arXiv
[66]

Pilaftsis and D

A. Pilaftsis and D. Teresi,Symmetry Improved CJT Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B874 (2013) 594 [1305.3221]

2013 arXiv
[67]

Pilaftsis and D

A. Pilaftsis and D. Teresi,Symmetry Improved 2PI Effective Action and the Infrared Divergences of the Standard Model,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.631(2015) 012008 [1502.07986]

2015 arXiv
[68]

Brown and I.B

M.J. Brown and I.B. Whittingham,Soft symmetry improvement of two particle irreducible effective actions,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 025018 [1611.05226]

2017 arXiv
[69]

Pilaftsis and D

A. Pilaftsis and D. Teresi,Exact RG Invariance and Symmetry Improved 2PI Effective Potential,Nucl. Phys. B920(2017) 298 [1703.02079]

2017 arXiv
[70]

Blaizot, E

J.P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebhan,Approximately selfconsistent resummations for the thermodynamics of the quark gluon plasma. 1. Entropy and density,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065003 [hep-ph/0005003]

2001 arXiv
[71]

Andersen and M

J.O. Andersen and M. Strickland,Three-loop Phi-derivable approximation in QED,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 025011 [hep-ph/0406163]. – 46 –

2005 arXiv
[72]

Berges, S

J. Berges, S. Borsanyi, U. Reinosa and J. Serreau,Renormalized thermodynamics from the 2PI effective action,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 105004 [hep-ph/0409123]

2005 arXiv
[73]

Braaten and R.D

E. Braaten and R.D. Pisarski,Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys. B337(1990) 569

1990
[74]

Blaizot, E

J.P. Blaizot, E. Iancu and A. Rebhan,Selfconsistent hard thermal loop thermodynamics for the quark gluon plasma,Phys. Lett. B470(1999) 181 [hep-ph/9910309]

1999 arXiv
[75]

Carrington, B.A

M.E. Carrington, B.A. Meggison and D. Pickering,The 2PI effective action at four loop order inφ 4 theory,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 025018 [1603.02085]

2016 arXiv
[76]

Banik, H

A. Banik, H. Hinrichsen and W. Porod,Renormalized equations of motion for scalars and fermions in the 2PI formalism,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2450072 [2307.14983]

2024 arXiv
[77]

Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh

L.V. Keldysh,Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47 (1964) 1515

1964
[78]

Bogoliubow and O.S

N.N. Bogoliubow and O.S. Parasiuk, ¨Uber die Multiplikation der Kausalfunktionen in der Quantentheorie der Felder,Acta Mathematica97(1957) 227

1957
[79]

Bogoliubov and O.S

N.N. Bogoliubov and O.S. Parasiuk,On the Multiplication of the causal function in the quantum theory of fields,Acta Math.97(1957) 227

1957
[80]

Hepp,Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization,Commun

K. Hepp,Proof of the Bogolyubov-Parasiuk theorem on renormalization,Commun. Math. Phys.2(1966) 301

1966
[81]

Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space,Commun

W. Zimmermann,Convergence of Bogolyubov’s method of renormalization in momentum space,Commun. Math. Phys.15(1969) 208

1969
[82]

Fejos, A

G. Fejos, A. Patkos and Z. Szep,Renormalisability of the 2PI-Hartree approximation of multicomponent scalar models in the broken symmetry phase,Nucl. Phys. A803(2008) 115 [0711.2933]

2008 arXiv
[83]

Curtin, P

D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu,Testing Electroweak Baryogenesis with Future Colliders, JHEP11(2014) 127 [1409.0005]

2014 arXiv
[84]

Carena, Z

M. Carena, Z. Liu and Y. Wang,Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z 2-breaking, JHEP08(2020) 107 [1911.10206]

2020 arXiv
[85]

Lewicki, M

M. Lewicki, M. Merchand and M. Zych,Electroweak bubble wall expansion: gravitational waves and baryogenesis in Standard Model-like thermal plasma,JHEP02(2022) 017 [2111.02393]

2022 arXiv
[86]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, M. Merchand, J.M. No and M. Zych,The scalar singlet extension of the Standard Model: gravitational waves versus baryogenesis,JHEP01(2023) 093 [2210.16305]

2023 arXiv
[87]

Moore, K

G.D. Moore, K. Rummukainen and A. Tranberg,Nonperturbative computation of the bubble nucleation rate in the cubic anisotropy model,JHEP04(2001) 017 [hep-lat/0103036]

2001 arXiv
[88]

Gould, S

O. Gould, S. G¨ uyer and K. Rummukainen,First-order electroweak phase transitions: A nonperturbative update,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 114507 [2205.07238]

2022 arXiv
[89]

Gould, A

O. Gould, A. Kormu and D.J. Weir,Nonperturbative test of nucleation calculations for strong phase transitions,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L051901 [2404.01876]

2025
[90]

Gould, A

O. Gould, A. Kormu and D.J. Weir,Testing nucleation calculations for strong phase transitions,PoSLA TTICE2024(2025) 365 [2502.04185]. – 47 –

2025 arXiv
[91]

Hirvonen and O

J. Hirvonen and O. Gould,Langer’s Nucleation Rate Reproduced on the Lattice,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 081601 [2505.22732]

2026 arXiv
[92]

Langer,Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states,Annals Phys.54(1969) 258

J.S. Langer,Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states,Annals Phys.54(1969) 258

1969
[93]

Moore and K

G.D. Moore and K. Rummukainen,Electroweak bubble nucleation, nonperturbatively,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 045002 [hep-ph/0009132]

2001 arXiv
[94]

Croon, O

D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T.V.I. Tenkanen and G. White,Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions,JHEP04(2021) 055 [2009.10080]

2021 arXiv
[95]

Ekstedt, O

A. Ekstedt, O. Gould and J. Hirvonen,BubbleDet: a Python package to compute functional determinants for bubble nucleation,JHEP12(2023) 056 [2308.15652]

2023 arXiv
[96]

Gould and J

O. Gould and J. Hirvonen,Effective field theory approach to thermal bubble nucleation, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 096015 [2108.04377]

2021 arXiv
[97]

Batini, A

L. Batini, A. Chatrchyan and J. Berges,Real-time dynamics of false vacuum decay,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023502 [2310.04206]

2024 arXiv
[98]

Carosi and B

M. Carosi and B. Garbrecht,False vacuum decay beyond the quadratic approximation: Summation of nonlocal self-energies,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085002 [2411.18421]

2025 arXiv
[99]

Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum

S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2929

1977
[100]

Callan, Jr

C.G. Callan, Jr. and S.R. Coleman,The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1762

1977
[101]

Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications, Phys

A.D. Linde,Fate of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature: Theory and Applications, Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 37

1981
[102]

Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl

A.D. Linde,Decay of the False Vacuum at Finite Temperature,Nucl. Phys. B216(1983) 421

1983
[103]

Guada, M

V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek and M. Pintar,FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions,Comput. Phys. Commun.256(2020) 107480 [2002.00881]

2020 arXiv
[104]

Anderson and L.J

G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall,The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2685

1992
[105]

Hindmarsh, S.J

M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 041301 [1304.2433]

2014 arXiv
[106]

Giblin and J.B

J.T. Giblin and J.B. Mertens,Gravitional radiation from first-order phase transitions in the presence of a fluid,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023532 [1405.4005]

2014 arXiv
[107]

Hindmarsh, S.J

M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 123009 [1504.03291]

2015 arXiv
[108]

Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys

M. Hindmarsh,Sound shell model for acoustic gravitational wave production at a first-order phase transition in the early Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 071301 [1608.04735]

2018 arXiv
[109]

Hindmarsh, S.J

M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir,Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 103520 [1704.05871]

2017 arXiv
[110]

Hindmarsh and M

M. Hindmarsh and M. Hijazi,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions in the Sound Shell Model,JCAP12(2019) 062 [1909.10040]. – 48 –

2019 arXiv
[111]

Kosowsky, M.S

A. Kosowsky, M.S. Turner and R. Watkins,Gravitational waves from first order cosmological phase transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 2026

1992
[112]

Kosowsky and M.S

A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner,Gravitational radiation from colliding vacuum bubbles: envelope approximation to many bubble collisions,Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 4372 [astro-ph/9211004]

1993 arXiv
[113]

Caprini, R

C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,Gravitational wave generation from bubble collisions in first-order phase transitions: An analytic approach,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 124015 [0711.2593]

2008 arXiv
[114]

Huber and T

S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin,Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles,JCAP09(2008) 022 [0806.1828]

2008 arXiv
[115]

Weir,Revisiting the envelope approximation: gravitational waves from bubble collisions, Phys

D.J. Weir,Revisiting the envelope approximation: gravitational waves from bubble collisions, Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 124037 [1604.08429]

2016 arXiv
[116]

Kosowsky, A

A. Kosowsky, A. Mack and T. Kahniashvili,Gravitational radiation from cosmological turbulence,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 024030 [astro-ph/0111483]

2002 arXiv
[117]

Dolgov, D

A.D. Dolgov, D. Grasso and A. Nicolis,Relic backgrounds of gravitational waves from cosmic turbulence,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 103505 [astro-ph/0206461]

2002 arXiv
[118]

Gogoberidze, T

G. Gogoberidze, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky,The Spectrum of Gravitational Radiation from Primordial Turbulence,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 083002 [0705.1733]

2007 arXiv
[119]

Caprini, R

C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant,The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition,JCAP12(2009) 024 [0909.0622]

2009 arXiv
[120]

Niksa, M

P. Niksa, M. Schlederer and G. Sigl,Gravitational Waves produced by Compressible MHD Turbulence from Cosmological Phase Transitions,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 144001 [1803.02271]

2018 arXiv
[121]

Roper Pol, S

A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg, T. Kahniashvili and A. Kosowsky,Numerical simulations of gravitational waves from early-universe turbulence,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083512 [1903.08585]

2020 arXiv
[122]

Kahniashvili, A

T. Kahniashvili, A. Brandenburg, G. Gogoberidze, S. Mandal and A. Roper Pol,Circular polarization of gravitational waves from early-Universe helical turbulence,Phys. Rev. Res.3 (2021) 013193 [2011.05556]

2021 arXiv
[123]

Roper Pol, S

A. Roper Pol, S. Mandal, A. Brandenburg and T. Kahniashvili,Polarization of gravitational waves from helical MHD turbulent sources,JCAP04(2022) 019 [2107.05356]

2022 arXiv
[124]

Auclair, C

P. Auclair, C. Caprini, D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh, K. Rummukainen, D.A. Steer et al., Generation of gravitational waves from freely decaying turbulence,JCAP09(2022) 029 [2205.02588]

2022 arXiv
[125]

Weir,Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review,Phil

D.J. Weir,Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review,Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(2018) 20170126 [1705.01783]

2018 arXiv
[126]

Caprini and D.G

C. Caprini and D.G. Figueroa,Cosmological backgrounds of gravitational waves,Class. Quant. Grav.35(2018) 163001 [1801.04268]

2018 arXiv
[127]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal,JCAP04(2019) 003 [1809.08242]. – 49 –

2019 arXiv
[128]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and V. Vaskonen,Updated predictions for gravitational waves produced in a strongly supercooled phase transition,JCAP11(2020) 020 [2007.15586]

2020 arXiv
[129]

Laurent and J.M

B. Laurent and J.M. Cline,First principles determination of bubble wall velocity,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 023501 [2204.13120]

2022 arXiv
[130]

Ekstedt, O

A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, J. Hirvonen, B. Laurent, L. Niemi, P. Schicho et al.,How fast does the WallGo? A package for computing wall velocities in first-order phase transitions,JHEP 04(2025) 101 [2411.04970]

2025 arXiv
[131]

van de Vis, P

J. van de Vis, P. Schicho, L. Niemi, B. Laurent, J. Hirvonen and O. Gould,WallGo investigates: Theoretical uncertainties in the bubble wall velocity,JHEP04(2026) 041 [2510.27691]

2026
[132]

Steinhardt,Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay, Phys

P.J. Steinhardt,Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay, Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 2074

1982
[133]

Espinosa, T

J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant,Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions,JCAP06(2010) 028 [1004.4187]

2010 arXiv
[134]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No,Gravitational waves from first-order cosmological phase transitions: lifetime of the sound wave source,JCAP07(2020) 050 [2003.07360]

2020 arXiv
[135]

H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, D. Vagie and G. White,Phase Transitions in an Expanding Universe: Stochastic Gravitational Waves in Standard and Non-Standard Histories,JCAP01(2021) 001 [2007.08537]

2021 arXiv
[136]

Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch

A. Denner,Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200,Fortsch. Phys.41(1993) 307 [0709.1075]. – 50 –

1993 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Kuzmin, V.A

V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov,On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B155(1985) 36

1985

[2] [2]

Morrissey and M.J

D.E. Morrissey and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf,Electroweak baryogenesis,New J. Phys.14(2012) 125003 [1206.2942]

arXiv 2012

[3] [3]

Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh

A.D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32

1967

[4] [4]

Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon

C.J. Hogan,Gravitational radiation from cosmological phase transitions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.218(1986) 629. [5]LISAcollaboration,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,1702.00786

arXiv 1986

[5] [6]

Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

D. Reitze et al.,Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 035 [1907.04833]

arXiv 2019

[6] [7]

Crowder and N.J

J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

arXiv 2005

[7] [8]

Corbin and N.J

V. Corbin and N.J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

arXiv 2006

[8] [9]

Harry, P

G.M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D.A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E.S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4887

2006