Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 56 references

Polarization-resolved attosecond gamma-ray emission from few-cycle laser interactions with cone targets

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single few-cycle laser pulse on a cone target is claimed to produce linearly polarized attosecond gamma-ray pulses: 300 as duration with a linear polarization degree of 0.78, reaching 0.88 for photons above 3 MeV.

desk verdict Solid numerical proof-of-concept for polarized attosecond gamma rays from cone targets, with a real weakness in how the 300 as duration is inferred. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04363 v1 pith:GSID3FI5 submitted 2026-08-05 physics.plasm-ph

De-Sheng Zhang , Cui-Wen Zhang , Xue-Ren Hong , Feng Wan , Jian-Xing Li , Bai-Song Xie This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords attosecondgammaraysphotonpolarizationnonlinearComptonscatteringQED-PICsimulationsconetargetfew-cyclelaserStokesparameterslaser-plasmainteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that a single few-cycle laser pulse striking the inside of a hollow cone produces gamma-ray flashes that are both extremely short and linearly polarized. The mechanism is a three-stage sequence: the laser's oblique reflection off the cone walls extracts and accelerates thin electron layers, and those electrons emit MeV photons by nonlinear Compton scattering when they meet the reflected attosecond field. Using a quantum-electrodynamics particle-in-cell simulation that tracks photon polarization, the paper reports a shortest equivalent duration of 300 attoseconds with a linear polarization degree of 0.78, rising to 0.88 for the highest-energy photons, with the polarization surviving wide-angle collection. If correct, this would make the cone target a compact single-laser source of polarization-resolved attosecond gamma rays for nuclear and strong-field QED studies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the spin- and polarization-resolved nonlinear Compton scattering rate, written as $d^2W_{\rm rad}/du\,dt=(W_R/2)(F_0+\xi_1F_1+\xi_2F_2+\xi_3F_3)$. The paper's key simplification is that for an unpolarized initial electron ensemble with unobserved final spin, the cross terms $F_1=F_2=0$, leaving a single linear-Stokes component $\xi_3=F_3/F_0$; hence the linear polarization degree $P_L=\sqrt{\langle\xi_1\rangle^2+\langle\xi_3\rangle^2}\simeq|\langle\xi_3\rangle|$ can be computed from the spin-averaged rate alone. The attosecond time structure comes from the cone geometry: oblique reflection creates a wall-normal field that periodically lifts electron layers, which then radiate in the counter-propagating reflected field.

What would settle it

Rerun the 90-degree cone case at doubled grid resolution and macroparticle number, integrate photons over the full forward hemisphere rather than the two diagonal lineouts, and compute the photon-weighted polarization of the entire attosecond burst; if the integrated degree of linear polarization falls well below 0.78 (say below 0.5), the reported value is a sampling artifact rather than a property of the pulse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the cone-target interaction is a source of linearly polarized attosecond gamma-ray pulses, not just bright unstructured emission. The polarization is carried almost entirely by the Stokes component $\xi_3$, because after averaging over the unpolarized initial electron spins the emission-rate coefficients $F_1$ and $F_2$ vanish, leaving $P_L \simeq |\langle\xi_3\rangle|$; this explains why the 300-as pulse has $P_L=0.78$ and why the high-energy band (3–6.5 MeV) reaches $P_L=0.88$. The two emission branches at $\pm45^\circ$ share the same lab-frame linear polarization, so combining them over angular half-widths up to $40^\circ$ keeps $P_L\approx0.86$ while retaining about 96% of the high-energy photons.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands or falls on whether the simulation's polarization output is numerically trustworthy: the key numbers come from a specific lineout and a narrow transverse tube, and the paper shows no convergence study or comparison with an independent code.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single few-cycle laser plus a hollow cone is enough to make a linearly polarized attosecond gamma-ray source; no externally preaccelerated electron beam or independently synchronized scattering pulse is needed.
  • Selecting photons above 3 MeV yields a more polarized sample ($P_L=0.88$) concentrated in two angular branches, trading yield for polarization.
  • Wide-angle collection (up to $40^\circ$ half-width) preserves $P_L\approx0.86$ and retains about 96% of the high-energy photons, so the source can run without tight collimation.
  • Cone opening angles of $30^\circ$ to $90^\circ$ give the best yield with $P_L\approx0.77$ to 0.78; larger angles improve polarization but reduce photon number and mean energy by orders of magnitude.
  • Raising laser amplitude and plasma density together (fixed similarity parameter) boosts photon number and mean energy but drops $P_L$ from 0.78 to 0.68, revealing a design tradeoff.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fact that $F_1=F_2=0$ follows from spin averaging suggests the reported polarization is a kinematic property of the collision geometry rather than a spin effect, so similar cone-like or wedge targets should produce comparably polarized attosecond gamma pulses and polarization could be optimized separately from brightness.
  • A three-dimensional simulation would test whether the wide-angle polarization retention survives the full azimuthal spread; the present 2D model weights the third dimension by the focal-spot radius and cannot capture out-of-plane Stokes rotation effects.
  • The fixed-similarity scan suggests that pushing toward shorter, higher-amplitude drivers to gain photon energy will erode polarization; shaping the cone wall angle along the laser axis might counteract this trend.
  • The 300-as duration is derived from a spatial FWHM along chosen diagnostic lineouts; a full angle- and space-integrated pulse characterization would clarify whether the duration seen by a downstream detector is as short as reported.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents two-dimensional spin- and polarization-resolved QED-PIC simulations of a few-cycle laser pulse interacting with a cone target. It reports that the interaction produces linearly polarized attosecond gamma-ray pulses, with a shortest equivalent duration of 300 as, a linear polarization degree of 0.78 for the pulse, a spectrum extending to 6 MeV, and a linear polarization degree of 0.88 for high-energy photons. The authors show that the polarization remains high when high-energy photons from both emission branches are collected over wide momentum-angle ranges, and they present parameter scans over cone opening angle and coupled laser amplitude–density (fixed similarity parameter S) that reveal tradeoffs among photon number, mean photon energy, and polarization.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are correct, this would be an attractive single-laser-target concept for polarized attosecond MeV gamma rays, with direct relevance to photonuclear and strong-field QED studies. The paper's strengths are that the polarization is computed from the emitted photon Stokes parameters in the simulation rather than fitted, the energy-resolved linear-polarization trend is consistent with the spin-averaged nonlinear Compton expression in Eq. (2), and the two high-energy emission branches share a common linear-polarization component in the laboratory basis so that wide-angle collection does not destroy the net polarization. However, the headline duration and pulse-level polarization rest on a spatial-snapshot lineout diagnostic, and no convergence study or code benchmark is provided. These gaps leave the specific numbers (300 as, PL=0.78, PL=0.88) not yet established, even though the overall picture is plausible.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 2 and Abstract] The 'shortest equivalent duration of 300 as' is obtained by taking the FWHM of the photon-density profile along the spatial lineouts x1 and x2 at t=22.0T0 and converting it to time as Δt=Δl/c. This conversion is only valid if the photons in the structure form a collimated bunch whose velocity is along the lineout direction. The angular distribution in Fig. 3(b) shows that low-energy photons span a wide range of θγ and that the high-energy branches peak near θγ≈−52.5° and +62.5°, not along the ±45° lineouts. For an ensemble with different propagation directions, a spatial density snapshot is not equivalent to an arrival-time distribution at a detector; spatial bunching at one instant can occur while photons arrive over a substantially longer interval. The paper therefore does not establish 300 as as a pulse duration. Please provide a temporal diagnostic (e.g., photon flux versus time at a detector plane) and report the angle-integrated pulse duration.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 2(c,d)] The pulse-level linear polarization degree PL=0.78 is computed from photons inside the density-defined FWHM interval and within a ±40 nm transverse tube centered on the diagnostic line. With a cell size of 18λ0/1600≈0.011λ0≈11 nm, this tube is only about seven cells wide, so the selected sample is very small. The paper does not report the number of macroparticles in this selection or the statistical uncertainty of the Stokes averages, making the headline polarization value difficult to assess. Please report the macroparticle count in the selected window and test the sensitivity of PL to the tube width and to the exact lineout position.
  3. [Section II and throughout] No convergence study or code benchmark is presented for the SLIPs simulations. The quantitative claims (300 as, PL=0.78, PL=0.88) require at least a scan over grid resolution and macroparticle number, as well as a validation of the polarization-resolved NCS module against an independent implementation or against the analytic ξ3 in Eq. (2) for a single-electron test case. Without this information, the numerical values cannot be considered converged or code-independent. Please add these tests for the reference configuration.
  4. [Section III, Fig. 3(a)] The statement that the linear polarization degree in the high-energy range reaches 0.88 refers to the 3–6.5 MeV bin, but the spectrum in the same panel falls steeply over this range, so the bin may contain very few photon macroparticles. The paper does not report the photon count or Poisson error for this bin, so the 0.88 value may not be statistically meaningful. Please provide the number of photons (or macroparticles) in each energy bin and the associated uncertainty.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 2(c,d)] The horizontal axes in Figs. 2(c,d) extend to 25λ0, while the simulation box is 18λ0 wide. Please clarify how the lineout coordinates are defined and whether particles that have exited the simulation box are included in the density profiles.
  2. [Section III] There is a small typographical issue in the text: 'Xue et al.showed' should read 'Xue et al. showed'.
  3. [Section III, Fig. 4] The choice of ±45° as the centers of the angular collection windows is motivated by the spatial lineout directions, but the high-energy branches in Fig. 3(b) peak near −52.5° and +62.5°. A sentence explaining why the windows are not centered on the branch peaks would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polarization and duration claims are simulation outputs, not fitted inputs or self-citation reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities are simulation diagnostics. The linear polarization degree PL is computed by photon-weight-averaging the Stokes parameters of photons emitted in the QED-PIC run, and the 300 as duration is inferred from the spatial FWHM of a photon-density lineout converted via Δt = Δl/c. Neither quantity is used as an input, fit parameter, or defining assumption; the analytic ξ3 curves in Fig. 3(c) are explicitly described as a qualitative reference rather than a point-by-point prediction. The paper does cite the authors' own code (Ref. 25) and previous cone-target mechanism (Ref. 22), but these are normal tool and mechanism citations: the code is a generic spin/polarization-resolved QED-PIC solver with stated LCFA assumptions that do not already contain the cone-target polarization result, and the present simulation reproduces the extraction-and-scattering mechanism rather than importing the claimed output. The absence of a convergence study or independent code benchmark is a validation and correctness concern, not evidence that the result is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All central quantities are results of a single simulation code at hand-chosen parameters; the stated physical inputs (LCFA, 2D geometry with w0 weighting, unpolarized initial electrons, fixed similarity scaling) are assumptions the reader must accept, and the code itself is an unvalidated-in-this-paper tool. No entities are invented and no parameters are fitted to data, but the scenario parameters listed below are chosen by hand and the quoted values depend on them.

free parameters (4)
  • Laser amplitude a0 = 30
    Reference simulation value chosen by hand; the scan raises it to 200 while keeping S=1.33. Central numbers (300 as, PL=0.78, PL=0.88) are for a0=30.
  • Plasma density ne = 40 nc
    Reference target density, chosen to keep similarity parameter S=1.33 with a0=30. Scanned proportionally with a0.
  • Cone opening angle = 90 degrees
    Reference geometry; scanned from 30 to 180 degrees. The polarization and yield values depend on this hand-chosen geometry.
  • Similarity parameter S = 1.33
    The coupled a0-ne scan fixes S=ne/(a0 nc)=1.33 to enable comparison under relativistic-similarity scaling; this is a modeling constraint, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LCFA applies to NCS in the simulated fields.
    Eq. (1) and Appendix A use the locally constant field approximation following Refs. 3, 6, 25; validity in the rapidly varying reflected fields is assumed, not demonstrated in this paper.
  • domain assumption SLIPs code correctly resolves Stokes parameters and electron spin in 2D.
    All polarization outputs come from this code (Sec II, Ref. 25); no benchmark or validation is presented in this paper.
  • domain assumption 2D geometry with third dimension weighted by w0 represents the source.
    Photon weights are multiplied by focal-spot radius w0 to estimate total photon number (Sec II, Ref. 28), which assumes translational invariance in the z direction.
  • domain assumption Initial electron ensemble is unpolarized.
    Stated in Sec II; the spin-averaged interpretation in Sec III relies on this.
  • domain assumption Relativistic similarity scaling S=1.33 allows comparison across a0 values.
    The coupled scan fixes S=ne/(a0 nc)=1.33 based on Ref. 27; this is a modeling constraint rather than a uniqueness result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarization-resolved attosecond gamma-ray emission from few-cycle laser interactions with cone targets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GSID3FI5

@misc{pith2026260804363,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarization-resolved attosecond gamma-ray emission from few-cycle laser interactions with cone targets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GSID3FI5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04363}
}
abstract

Linearly polarized attosecond $\gamma$-ray pulses in the MeV range are generated from a cone target irradiated by a single few-cycle laser pulse. Electron layers are periodically extracted from the cone walls and subsequently accelerated. Their interaction with the counter-propagating reflected attosecond field produces high-energy photons through nonlinear Compton scattering (NCS), forming attosecond $\gamma$-ray pulses. We model this interaction using two-dimensional quantum electrodynamics particle-in-cell (QED-PIC) simulations that resolve electron spin and photon polarization during emission. The results show a shortest equivalent duration of $300\,\mathrm{as}$, with a corresponding linear polarization degree of 0.78. The photon spectrum extends to $6\,\mathrm{MeV}$, and the linear polarization degree in the high-energy range reaches 0.88. The linear polarization degree remains high when photons from both emission directions are collected over wide momentum-angle ranges. Scans over the cone opening angle and the coupled laser-plasma parameters reveal tradeoffs among photon number, mean photon energy, and polarization. Such highly polarized attosecond $\gamma$-ray pulses could be used to investigate ultrafast nuclear dynamics and polarization-dependent processes in strong-field quantum electrodynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04363 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Generation scheme for polarized attosecond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Longitudinal electric-field distribution and directional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spectral, angular, and spin-resolved properties of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Momentum-angle collection of polarized high-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Parameter dependence of photon polarization, number, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Krausz, Ferenc and Ivanov, Misha , title =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Li, Jie and Ren, Xiaoming and Yin, Yanchun and Zhao, Kun and Chew, Andrew and Cheng, Yan and Cunningham, Eric and Wang, Yang and Hu, Shuyuan and Wu, Yi and Chini, Michael and Chang, Zenghu , title =. Nat. Commun. , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    and MacArthur, James P

    Duris, Joseph and Li, Siqi and Driver, Taran and Champenois, Elio G. and MacArthur, James P. and Lutman, Alberto A. and Zhang, Zhen and Rosenberger, Philipp and Aldrich, Jeff W. and Coffee, Ryan and Coslovich, Giacomo and Decker, Franz-Josef and Glownia, James M. and Hartmann, Gregor and Helml, Wolfram and Kamalov, Andrei and Knurr, Jonas and Krzywinski, ...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Weller, H. R. and Langenbrunner, J. and Chasteler, R. M. and Tomusiak, E. L. and Asai, J. and Seyler, R. G. and Lehman, D. R. , title =. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    and Galow, Benjamin J

    Li, Jian-Xing and Hatsagortsyan, Karen Z. and Galow, Benjamin J. and Keitel, Christoph H. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Zhu, Xing-Long and Chen, Min and Yu, Tong-Pu and Weng, Su-Ming and Hu, Li-Xiang and McKenna, Paul and Sheng, Zheng-Ming , title =. Appl. Phys. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    and Keitel, Christoph H

    Li, Yan-Fei and Shaisultanov, Rashid and Chen, Yue-Yue and Wan, Feng and Hatsagortsyan, Karen Z. and Keitel, Christoph H. and Li, Jian-Xing , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    and King, B

    Tang, S. and King, B. and Hu, H. , title =. Phys. Lett. B , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Matter Radiat

    Xue, Kun and Dou, Zhen-Ke and Wan, Feng and Yu, Tong-Pu and Wang, Wei-Min and Ren, Jie-Ru and Zhao, Qian and Zhao, Yong-Tao and Xu, Zhong-Feng and Li, Jian-Xing , title =. Matter Radiat. Extremes , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  2. [10]

    Wang, Yu and Ababekri, Mamutjan and Wan, Feng and Wen, Jia-Xing and Wei, Wen-Qing and Li, Zhong-Peng and Kang, Hai-Tao and Zhang, Bo and Zhao, Yong-Tao and Zhou, Wei-Min and Li, Jian-Xing , title =. Phys. Plasmas , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  3. [11]

    Elaji, Arzigul and Bake, Mamat Ali and Tang, Suo and Xie, Bai Song , title =. Chin. J. Phys. , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  4. [12]

    Plasma Phys

    Zhang, Liang-Qi and Liu, Ke and Tang, Suo and Luo, Wen and Zhao, Jie and Zhang, Hao and Yu, Tong-Pu , title =. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  5. [13]

    and Cao, Lei-Feng and Li, Jian-Xing , title =

    Cui, Li-Jie and Wei, Ke-Jia and Lv, Chong and Wan, Feng and Salamin, Yousef I. and Cao, Lei-Feng and Li, Jian-Xing , title =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  6. [14]

    and Balabanski, D

    Zilges, A. and Balabanski, D. L. and Isaak, J. and Pietralla, N. , title =. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  7. [15]

    Zhang, Cui-Wen and Zhu, Yi-Xuan and Lv, Jian-Feng and Xie, Bai-Song , title =. Appl. Sci. , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  8. [16]

    Matter Radiat

    Wan, Feng and Lv, Chong and Xue, Kun and Dou, Zhen-Ke and Zhao, Qian and Ababekri, Mamutjan and Wei, Wen-Qing and Li, Zhong-Peng and Zhao, Yong-Tao and Li, Jian-Xing , title =. Matter Radiat. Extremes , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  9. [17]

    Plasma Sci

    Hou, Yajuan and Xie, Baisong and Lv, Chong and Wan, Feng and Wang, Li and Yasen, Nureli and Sang, Haibo and Xia, Guoxing , title =. Plasma Sci. Technol. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  10. [18]

    and Pukhov, A

    Gordienko, S. and Pukhov, A. , title =. Phys. Plasmas , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  11. [19]

    and Kienberger, R

    Hentschel, M. and Kienberger, R. and Spielmann, Ch. and Reider, G. A. and Milosevic, N. and Brabec, T. and Corkum, P. and Heinzmann, U. and Drescher, M. and Krausz, F. , title =. Nature , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    2001

  12. [20]

    Morishita, Toru and Watanabe, Shinichi and Lin, C. D. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  13. [21]

    and Gordienko, S

    Baeva, T. and Gordienko, S. and Pukhov, A. , title =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  14. [22]

    Heissler, P. and H. Few-cycle driven relativistically oscillating plasma mirrors: A source of intense isolated attosecond pulses , journal =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  15. [23]

    and Mikhailova, Julia M

    Edwards, Matthew R. and Mikhailova, Julia M. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  16. [24]

    Zhang, Y. X. and Rykovanov, S. and Shi, Mingyuan and Zhong, C. L. and He, X. T. and Qiao, B. and Zepf, M. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  17. [25]

    and Tang, S

    King, B. and Tang, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  18. [26]

    Ridgers, C. P. and Brady, C. S. and Duclous, R. and Kirk, J. G. and Bennett, K. and Arber, T. D. and Robinson, A. P. L. and Bell, A. R. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  19. [27]

    and Corvan, D

    Sarri, G. and Corvan, D. J. and Schumaker, W. and Cole, J. M. and Di Piazza, A. and Ahmed, H. and Harvey, C. and Keitel, C. H. and Krushelnick, K. and Mangles, S. P. D. and Najmudin, Z. and Symes, D. and Thomas, A. G. R. and Yeung, M. and Zhao, Z. and Zepf, M. , title =. Phys....

    2014

  20. [28]

    and Akimune, H

    Utsunomiya, H. and Akimune, H. and Goko, S. and Ohta, M. and Ueda, H. and Yamagata, T. and Yamasaki, K. and Ohgaki, H. and Toyokawa, H. and Lui, Y.-W. and Hayakawa, T. and Shizuma, T. and Khan, E. and Goriely, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2003 , doi =

    2003

  21. [29]

    author author C. P. \ Ridgers , author C. S. \ Brady , author R. Duclous , author J. G. \ Kirk , author K. Bennett , author T. D. \ Arber , author A. P. L. \ Robinson ,\ and\ author A. R. \ Bell ,\ title title Dense electron-positron plasmas and ultraintense rays from laser-ir...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Sarri , author D

    author author G. Sarri , author D. J. \ Corvan , author W. Schumaker , author J. M. \ Cole , author A. Di Piazza , author H. Ahmed , author C. Harvey , author C. H. \ Keitel , author K. Krushelnick , author S. P. D. \ Mangles , author Z. Najmudin , author D. Symes , author A. ...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Xue , author Z.-K

    author author K. Xue , author Z.-K. \ Dou , author F. Wan , author T.-P. \ Yu , author W.-M. \ Wang , author J.-R. \ Ren , author Q. Zhao , author Y.-T. \ Zhao , author Z.-F. \ Xu ,\ and\ author J.-X. \ Li ,\ title title Generation of highly-polarized high-energy brilliant -ra...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Krausz \ and\ author M

    author author F. Krausz \ and\ author M. Ivanov ,\ title title Attosecond physics , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.163 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 81 ,\ pages 163--234 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    author author H. R. \ Weller , author J. Langenbrunner , author R. M. \ Chasteler , author E. L. \ Tomusiak , author J. Asai , author R. G. \ Seyler ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Lehman ,\ title title Angular distribution coefficients for ( , X ) reactions with linearly polarized pho...

    doi

  26. [34]

    \ Li , author R

    author author Y.-F. \ Li , author R. Shaisultanov , author Y.-Y. \ Chen , author F. Wan , author K. Z. \ Hatsagortsyan , author C. H. \ Keitel ,\ and\ author J.-X. \ Li ,\ title title Polarized ultrashort brilliant multi- GeV rays via single-shot laser-electron interaction , \...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Hentschel , author R

    author author M. Hentschel , author R. Kienberger , author C. Spielmann , author G. A. \ Reider , author N. Milosevic , author T. Brabec , author P. Corkum , author U. Heinzmann , author M. Drescher ,\ and\ author F. Krausz ,\ title title Attosecond metrology , \ https://doi.o...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Morishita , author S

    author author T. Morishita , author S. Watanabe ,\ and\ author C. D. \ Lin ,\ title title Attosecond light pulses for probing two-electron dynamics of helium in the time domain , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.083003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pa...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Tang , author B

    author author S. Tang , author B. King ,\ and\ author H. Hu ,\ title title Highly polarised gamma photons from electron-laser collisions , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135701 journal journal Phys. Lett. B \ volume 809 ,\ pages 135701 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  30. [38]

    King \ and\ author S

    author author B. King \ and\ author S. Tang ,\ title title Nonlinear Compton scattering of polarized photons in plane-wave backgrounds , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.102.022809 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 102 ,\ pages 022809 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [39]

    Wang , author M

    author author Y. Wang , author M. Ababekri , author F. Wan , author J.-X. \ Wen , author W.-Q. \ Wei , author Z.-P. \ Li , author H.-T. \ Kang , author B. Zhang , author Y.-T. \ Zhao , author W.-M. \ Zhou ,\ and\ author J.-X. \ Li ,\ title title Manipulation of -ray polarizati...

    doi

  32. [40]

    \ Cui , author K.-J

    author author L.-J. \ Cui , author K.-J. \ Wei , author C. Lv , author F. Wan , author Y. I. \ Salamin , author L.-F. \ Cao ,\ and\ author J.-X. \ Li ,\ title title Generation of ultracollimated polarized attosecond -rays via beam instabilities , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    doi

  33. [41]

    Zilges , author D

    author author A. Zilges , author D. L. \ Balabanski , author J. Isaak ,\ and\ author N. Pietralla ,\ title title Photonuclear reactions---from basic research to applications , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103903 journal journal Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. \ volume 122 ,\ ...

    2021

  34. [42]

    Utsunomiya , author H

    author author H. Utsunomiya , author H. Akimune , author S. Goko , author M. Ohta , author H. Ueda , author T. Yamagata , author K. Yamasaki , author H. Ohgaki , author H. Toyokawa , author Y.-W. \ Lui , author T. Hayakawa , author T. Shizuma , author E. Khan ,\ and\ author S....

    doi

  35. [43]

    Li , author X

    author author J. Li , author X. Ren , author Y. Yin , author K. Zhao , author A. Chew , author Y. Cheng , author E. Cunningham , author Y. Wang , author S. Hu , author Y. Wu , author M. Chini ,\ and\ author Z. Chang ,\ title title 53-attosecond X -ray pulses reach the carbon K...

    doi

  36. [44]

    Duris , author S

    author author J. Duris , author S. Li , author T. Driver , author E. G. \ Champenois , author J. P. \ MacArthur , author A. A. \ Lutman , author Z. Zhang , author P. Rosenberger , author J. W. \ Aldrich , author R. Coffee , author G. Coslovich , author F.-J. \ Decker , author ...

  37. [45]

    Heissler , author R

    author author P. Heissler , author R. H \"o rlein , author J. M. \ Mikhailova , author L. Waldecker , author P. Tzallas , author A. Buck , author K. Schmid , author C. M. S. \ Sears , author F. Krausz , author L. Veisz , author M. Zepf ,\ and\ author G. D. \ Tsakiris ,\ title ...

    doi

  38. [46]

    author author M. R. \ Edwards \ and\ author J. M. \ Mikhailova ,\ title title Waveform-controlled relativistic high-order-harmonic generation , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.125001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 125001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  39. [47]

    author author Y. X. \ Zhang , author S. Rykovanov , author M. Shi , author C. L. \ Zhong , author X. T. \ He , author B. Qiao ,\ and\ author M. Zepf ,\ title title Giant isolated attosecond pulses from two-color laser-plasma interactions , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett...

    doi

  40. [48]

    \ Li , author K

    author author J.-X. \ Li , author K. Z. \ Hatsagortsyan , author B. J. \ Galow ,\ and\ author C. H. \ Keitel ,\ title title Attosecond gamma-ray pulses via nonlinear Compton scattering in the radiation-dominated regime , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.204801 journal...

    doi

  41. [49]

    \ Zhu , author M

    author author X.-L. \ Zhu , author M. Chen , author T.-P. \ Yu , author S.-M. \ Weng , author L.-X. \ Hu , author P. McKenna ,\ and\ author Z.-M. \ Sheng ,\ title title Bright attosecond -ray pulses from nonlinear Compton scattering with laser-illuminated compound targets , \ ...

    doi

  42. [50]

    \ Zhang , author Y.-X

    author author C.-W. \ Zhang , author Y.-X. \ Zhu , author J.-F. \ Lv ,\ and\ author B.-S. \ Xie ,\ title title Simulation study of a bright attosecond -ray source generation by irradiating an intense laser on a cone target , \ https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094361 journal journa...

    doi

  43. [51]

    Elaji , author M

    author author A. Elaji , author M. A. \ Bake , author S. Tang ,\ and\ author B. S. \ Xie ,\ title title Bright attosecond polarized -ray emission from the interaction of an intense laser pulse with non-uniform near-critical-density plasma , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.202...

    doi

  44. [52]

    \ Zhang , author K

    author author L.-Q. \ Zhang , author K. Liu , author S. Tang , author W. Luo , author J. Zhao , author H. Zhang ,\ and\ author T.-P. \ Yu ,\ title title Generation of isolated and polarized -ray pulse by few-cycle laser irradiating a nanofoil , \ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6...

    doi

  45. [53]

    Wan , author C

    author author F. Wan , author C. Lv , author K. Xue , author Z.-K. \ Dou , author Q. Zhao , author M. Ababekri , author W.-Q. \ Wei , author Z.-P. \ Li , author Y.-T. \ Zhao ,\ and\ author J.-X. \ Li ,\ title title Simulations of spin/polarization-resolved laser-plasma interac...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Baeva , author S

    author author T. Baeva , author S. Gordienko ,\ and\ author A. Pukhov ,\ title title Theory of high-order harmonic generation in relativistic laser interaction with overdense plasma , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.046404 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 74 ,\ page...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Gordienko \ and\ author A

    author author S. Gordienko \ and\ author A. Pukhov ,\ title title Scalings for ultrarelativistic laser plasmas and quasimonoenergetic electrons , \ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1884126 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ pages 043109 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  48. [56]

    Hou , author B

    author author Y. Hou , author B. Xie , author C. Lv , author F. Wan , author L. Wang , author N. Yasen , author H. Sang ,\ and\ author G. Xia ,\ title title High density -ray emission and dense positron production via multi-laser driven circular target , \ https://doi.org/10.1...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.