Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.279090Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings
As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 63 of 63 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.04735.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
63 of 63 outbound references displayed
- verified exact6
- verified fuzzy17
- unresolved40
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 7847c1fd-240f-4c1b-8b72-b44e8ba17873 · outbound
This paper cites Inspect AI : Framework for large language model evaluations, May 2024.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Inspect AI : Framework for large language model evaluations, May 2024
Reference 1
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:57.025625Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d2be7f1d-5e18-467f-9912-e82813a20e15 · outbound
This paper cites Introducing Claude haiku 4.5, October 2025 a.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Introducing Claude haiku 4.5, October 2025 a
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:56.835810Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation e95b416b-de1e-4fd8-92ee-637b4e2811a0 · outbound
This paper cites Introducing Claude opus 4.5, November 2025 b.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Introducing Claude opus 4.5, November 2025 b
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:56.491211Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 1a90898a-bc18-40f9-8b9a-f0032c091536 · outbound
This paper cites Introducing Claude sonnet 4.5, September 2025 c.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Introducing Claude sonnet 4.5, September 2025 c
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:56.238274Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 96f401f5-f452-466e-8c89-fc3e111287e3 · outbound
This paper cites Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.013543Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 366a74fc-0792-4b39-b5c3-c60280eb4461 · outbound
This paper cites Biases in the Blind Spot: Detecting What LLMs Fail to Mention.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Biases in the Blind Spot: Detecting What LLMs Fail to Mention
Reference 6
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.079079Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3b791013-7f29-4d0b-888a-19e074ff7dea · outbound
This paper cites How does information access affect LLM monitors' ability to detect sabotage? arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21112, January 2026.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings How does information access affect LLM monitors' ability to detect sabotage? arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21112, January 2026
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.773964Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation e411a152-ded3-44c0-bd5f-77beed122afc · outbound
This paper cites CoT red-handed: Stress testing chain-of-thought monitoring.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings CoT red-handed: Stress testing chain-of-thought monitoring
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.696529Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 0aa7a58c-ad9e-47a7-99cb-42408b2e00b0 · outbound
This paper cites Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation
Reference 9
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.240956Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 791437e5-9cf6-41f3-beb7-14463f28461b · outbound
This paper cites Value Leakage: An LLM's Answers Are Silently Shaped by Its Own Values.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Value Leakage: An LLM's Answers Are Silently Shaped by Its Own Values
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified exact
- local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:53.503854Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation ee052de4-fd50-4743-b7dc-1918bc7d93d5 · outbound
This paper cites Censored LLMs as a natural testbed for secret knowledge elicitation.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Censored LLMs as a natural testbed for secret knowledge elicitation
Reference 11
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.622765Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation a1af007d-4c82-4494-8810-dfe623e17938 · outbound
This paper cites Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
Reference 13
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.482929Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 31bd8a52-def3-4980-b486-f4912b8a29b7 · outbound
This paper cites Lee, He He, Ian Kivlichan, Bowen Baker, Micah Carroll, and Tomek Korbak.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Lee, He He, Ian Kivlichan, Bowen Baker, Micah Carroll, and Tomek Korbak
Reference 14
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.542529Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation e5e97ee0-eae1-4eb5-b90e-08d1df8d9865 · outbound
This paper cites Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?
Reference 15
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.627288Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f3d8dc31-19d1-4cda-9ead-c45b620d98b6 · outbound
This paper cites When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors
Reference 16
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:51.719517Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e76d3e12-a314-4abe-94a4-1407cb4be026 · outbound
This paper cites (some) natural emergent misalignment from reward hacking in non-production rl, March 2026.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings (some) natural emergent misalignment from reward hacking in non-production rl, March 2026
Reference 17
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:56.031994Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d3aea62b-7a06-4803-9dad-47dc30961199 · outbound
This paper cites Guan, Miles Wang, Micah Carroll, Zehao Dou, Annie Y.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Guan, Miles Wang, Micah Carroll, Zehao Dou, Annie Y
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified exact
- doi, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.467492Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 8cb673e0-48bc-460e-b3d1-bed4380fa23f · outbound
This paper cites Noticing the watcher: LLM agents can infer CoT monitoring from blocking feedback.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Noticing the watcher: LLM agents can infer CoT monitoring from blocking feedback
Reference 19
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.058436Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3e760a5c-06ea-4874-9859-3c1560cfed5b · outbound
This paper cites Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.127591Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 22c44c1e-22f5-4d04-b6fd-fce58ce9fa4f · outbound
This paper cites SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents
Reference 21
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.183344Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1876190b-3bb6-4f5d-8e47-bda706cf4f6a · outbound
This paper cites Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.186621Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1c2634c9-8748-435f-89fc-1556adf7a8e6 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Unresolved cited work
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.188944Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 3651c42c-9b21-436c-ab27-1bab369e683f · outbound
This paper cites Kimi k2 thinking, January 2026.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Kimi k2 thinking, January 2026
Reference 24
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:55.762764Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 4760181c-3f11-4e6a-8253-4d579d9e9421 · outbound
This paper cites gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b model card, August 2025.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b model card, August 2025
Reference 25
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:55.503751Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation d17cf599-3150-4a5b-8cc7-14591bd740eb · outbound
This paper cites Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.195387Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4269579b-a6a1-498b-8a71-ec6210044950 · outbound
This paper cites Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision, 2025.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision, 2025
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.200090Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d19fe64f-252a-44d0-be19-488d429369ef · outbound
This paper cites Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering
Reference 29
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.202208Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1e354193-0b20-4880-bdd3-940b439a681b · outbound
This paper cites Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Prompting
Reference 30
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.204689Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fc5cb71a-18b1-49eb-a2ec-5d8a375928a1 · outbound
This paper cites Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Reference 31
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.207562Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d43bd6ce-84b7-4f2f-b8b1-aa28a045cfa8 · outbound
This paper cites MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
Reference 32
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.209806Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation e8b455d8-8d05-46f3-859c-f38727e2e722 · outbound
This paper cites Grok 3 beta --- the age of reasoning agents, February 2025.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Grok 3 beta --- the age of reasoning agents, February 2025
Reference 33
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:55.227558Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 54fed9a0-8407-4395-ae8a-33038bcb0cfd · outbound
This paper cites GLM -4.7: Advancing the coding capability, December 2025.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings GLM -4.7: Advancing the coding capability, December 2025
Reference 34
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.965790Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 13fb16fc-05d5-414c-8ed0-4e4729999ed4 · outbound
This paper cites Can reasoning models obfuscate reasoning? stress-testing chain-of-thought monitorability.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Can reasoning models obfuscate reasoning? stress-testing chain-of-thought monitorability
Reference 35
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.216459Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2437502c-1a34-4113-ae1e-bba68ec7ea31 · outbound
This paper cites 2023 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2023 , eprint=
Reference 36
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.218672Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 927958a4-176c-4630-b2be-86610271f78c · outbound
This paper cites 2023 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2023 , eprint=
Reference 37
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.220659Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 98c666c8-bd05-4431-8064-c1bb5dc17370 · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , eprint=
Reference 38
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.222703Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4f9459d3-121b-4223-a87d-8015784b7ea4 · outbound
This paper cites 2026 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2026 , eprint=
Reference 39
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.777138Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 5178187b-cf63-4f2c-8935-92370c368a2d · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , eprint=
Reference 40
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.665282Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation c9b6f91c-e608-4553-900d-9d7171c2293c · outbound
This paper cites 2026 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2026 , eprint=
Reference 41
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.582474Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 8a77ec12-81e6-421d-95ab-c5a11106bdca · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , eprint=
Reference 42
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.230732Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2216db55-6d18-447f-abcf-399d79cf8587 · outbound
This paper cites arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18311 , year =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.18311 , year =
Reference 43
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.232686Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f2441273-de61-4d74-98c2-3bd6b0405e43 · outbound
This paper cites Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation
Reference 44
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.234780Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 03053e1a-46ae-4826-8f62-66d4aa37aeb3 · outbound
This paper cites arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05706 , year =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05706 , year =
Reference 45
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.236856Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 73fad7a8-57a9-467f-9bc2-e574c9639c7a · outbound
This paper cites arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19851 , year =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19851 , year =
Reference 46
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.238875Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d596953b-7e25-450b-b47c-9a8a9b4bc214 · outbound
This paper cites arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23575 , year =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.23575 , year =
Reference 47
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.241151Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b9bf8812-08ae-4748-befb-961011b835f5 · outbound
This paper cites When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings When Chain of Thought is Necessary, Language Models Struggle to Evade Monitors
Reference 48
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.243168Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b8b8928b-266a-431f-8ecc-d9792f291cf1 · outbound
This paper cites Noticing the Watcher:.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Noticing the Watcher:
Reference 49
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.381037Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation f77f12fa-2906-4938-afa5-a16bcb1a9463 · outbound
This paper cites SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents
Reference 50
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.248062Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9aedb683-1bd7-40c5-815c-4ffddab805dd · outbound
This paper cites How does information access affect.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings How does information access affect
Reference 51
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.250176Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 9f4c68f4-055c-4a3b-a21e-2af33c9e81f9 · outbound
This paper cites Censored.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Censored
Reference 52
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.251993Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8866e0b7-52c9-4da1-818d-d74a206bfd76 · outbound
This paper cites Steering.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Steering
Reference 53
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.249447Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 1bde4f1c-47e6-4640-b119-782c5d80421e · outbound
This paper cites Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering
Reference 54
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.255930Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 47e18b2a-f703-4c80-9d3f-be93e2d71ed6 · outbound
This paper cites Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?
Reference 55
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.258144Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 27e34088-3de7-4aec-a62c-7553b5bb1345 · outbound
This paper cites Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think
Reference 56
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.260226Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8daac443-4250-474f-8592-87fb3f5eef50 · outbound
This paper cites Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Teaching Models to Verbalize Reward Hacking in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Reference 57
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.262506Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 10dc86da-4f31-49dd-89d6-1d84367a99da · outbound
This paper cites 2026 , month=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2026 , month=
Reference 58
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:54.034479Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 0370dbc7-3f1a-4713-a0a5-382c4d7f45b6 · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , eprint=
Reference 59
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:53.801715Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation 10862a44-87c1-49bd-a152-b497a20cabab · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , eprint=
Reference 60
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:53.612616Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.
Observation ff7822dc-7acd-4f27-a4e3-83cd1b74624f · outbound
This paper cites Humanity's Last Exam.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings Humanity's Last Exam
Reference 61
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.270575Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f68615f0-7475-41bb-8659-4c087ba4a378 · outbound
This paper cites 2025 , month =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2025 , month =
Reference 62
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.272644Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 8e3d9c8b-8daf-4730-91e2-6918e9a77e7c · outbound
This paper cites 2024 , month =.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2024 , month =
Reference 63
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.274605Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 5a939a46-89a1-43c6-a786-78eb546c2959 · outbound
This paper cites GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
Reference 64
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.276967Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7975a77d-4bac-4655-b354-d47530af65b9 · outbound
This paper cites 2024 , eprint=.
Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Can Be Unreliable in Implicit-Influence Settings 2024 , eprint=
Reference 65
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:51:52.279090Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.