Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 145 references

Higher-Spin Correlators in dS

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read dS4 higher-spin correlators are rational; at five points the pentagon reduces to an orbit sum over K5 subgraphs, the leading Landau singularity cancels on the Gram locus, and physical poles are only soft, collapsed, and Ptolemy.

desk verdict The five-point result is new and likely correct; the finite-field reconstruction is a real limitation but not a fatal one. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05278 v1 pith:W4Y5TESS submitted 2026-08-05 hep-th

Shounak De , Hayden Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords higher-spingravitydeSitterholographycosmologicalcorrelatorsmomentum-spacebootstrapone-loopn-gonintegralsspurioussingularitiesPtolemyrelationrationalfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works in the only known exactly solvable toy model of stringy cosmology: minimal higher-spin gravity in four-dimensional de Sitter space, described holographically by a free vector model whose connected $n$-point functions are three-dimensional one-loop $n$-gon integrals. It establishes that every such correlator is a rational function of the boundary momenta, with a singularity structure governed by the geometry of a dual polygon rather than by the energy poles of ordinary effective field theory. At four points the only surviving physical singularity is a Ptolemy relation, $st + k_1k_3 + k_2k_4 = 0$, the momentum-space analogue of the cyclic-quadrilateral theorem that the product of the diagonals equals the sum of the products of opposite sides. At five points the apparent leading Landau pole of the pentagon integral is shown to be spurious, cancelling exactly once the Gram constraint (the algebraic relation forced by having five momentum vectors in three dimensions) is imposed, and the final expression organizes into orbits of subgraphs of the complete graph $K_5$. The paper argues that this graph combinatorics points toward a bootstrap in which conformal invariance and the physical singularities of all $n$-point correlators emerge from the complete graph $K_n$.

What carries the argument

The engine of the computation is the Melrose reduction of one-loop $n$-gon integrals, driven by rank deficiencies of three nested kinematic matrices: the Cayley matrix $Y_n$, the modified Cayley matrix $\bar{Y}_n$, and the Cayley–Menger matrix $CM_n$. In $D=3$ the linear single-step reduction collapses every pentagon into five boxes, the quadratic reduction collapses every box into four triangles, and the triangle integral evaluates to $1/(k_1k_2k_3)$, so carrying the hierarchy to completion proves rationality of every $n$-point correlator. The five-point spurious-pole cancellation rests on a gauge-fixing trick followed by reconstruction: with external momenta parametrized by nine component variables, the pentagon's leading Landau polynomial becomes the perfect square $\Delta_5|_{\rm gf} = -8\Omega_5^2$, the reduction coefficients carry one factor of $\Omega_5$ each, and the apparent pole cancels precisely when every coefficient of every cycle monomial $X_\gamma$ is divisible by $\Omega_5$; the surviving coefficients are then reconstructed as polynomials in the ten squared distance variables, a step performed over a finite field and lifted to the integers.

What would settle it

Integrate the ordered pentagon integral (4.1) numerically at real physical momenta that satisfy the Gram constraint $G_5 = 0$ and lie on the apparent Landau locus $\Delta_5 = 0$ but away from $D_{\rm phys} = 0$: the spurious-cancellation claim predicts a finite value, and a divergent result would refute it. A sharper test is the hexagon: if the combinatorial bootstrap is right, $I_{123456}$ should again be rational, with $\Delta_6$ cancelling on the two Gram constraints and the numerator organizing into $S_6$ orbits of subgraphs of $K_6$; any genuine new physical singularity beyond the soft, collapsed, and Ptolemy loci at $n = 6$ would falsify the general-$n$ claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is the spurious-free reduction of the ordered five-point correlator, $I_{12345} = (N_\triangle + N_H + N_{\bar\triangle})/D_{\rm phys}$ (Eq. 4.30), obtained from the three-dimensional pentagon integral by the Melrose reduction through boxes to triangles. The numerator is a polynomial whose 32 monomials form three complete $S_5$ orbits in the edge set of the complete graph $K_5$ on the five dual vertices: ten triangles (3-cycles), twelve Hamiltonian cycles (5-cycles visiting every vertex once), and ten triangle complements (the seven edges left after deleting a triangle), with representative coefficients given in Eqs. (4.26), (4.27), and (4.29). The physical denominator $D_{\rm phys}$ is the product of the ten edge lengths of $K_5$, producing the soft and collapsed singularities, times five four-point Ptolemy factors $F^{(i)}_{++}$ inherited from the box subgraphs. The apparent leading Landau singularity $\Delta_5 = \det \bar{Y}_5$ cancels only after the physical Gram constraint $G_5 = 0$ is imposed; gauge-fixing the kinematics makes $\Delta_5$ a perfect square, $\Delta_5|_{\rm gf} = -8\Omega_5^2$, so the cancellation is the statement that every cycle-monomial coefficient of the numerator is divisible by $\Omega_5$. The four-point correlator emerges as the special case in which only the branch $st + k_1k_3 + k_2k_4$ survives among the four Landau factors, and the paper reports numerical verification of the five-point formula against the original integral (4.1).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the free vector-model Q-model in the Gaussian Hartle–Hawking state is the exact holographic dual of minimal higher-spin gravity in de Sitter space; if that conjectural dictionary fails, the rational functions computed here remain correlators of the free field theory, but their status as de Sitter higher-spin gravity observables, and the cosmological significance of the Ptolemy singularity structure, is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every connected scalar $n$-point correlator of the model is a rational function of the boundary kinematics, for every $n$, because the reduction hierarchy terminates at the elementary triangle integral.
  • Four-point correlators have no total- or partial-energy singularities; their only nontrivial physical singularity is the Ptolemy locus $st + k_1k_3 + k_2k_4 = 0$, in sharp contrast to ordinary perturbative EFT correlators.
  • At five points the leading Landau singularity of the pentagon is spurious and cancels on the Gram locus; the physical singularities are exactly the soft limits (an edge length of $K_5$ vanishing), the collapsed limits (a partial sum of momenta vanishing), and the Ptolemy limits of the five box subgraphs.
  • Both the four- and five-point ordered correlators satisfy the momentum-space conformal Ward identities, the pentagon on the Gram locus $G_5 = 0$.
  • The paper proposes that the $S_5$-orbit structure of the five-point numerator signals a combinatorial bootstrap in which conformal invariance and the singularity structure of all $n$-point correlators emerge from the graph combinatorics of $K_n$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The hexagon is the natural decisive test of the proposed bootstrap: if at $n = 6$ the spurious leading Landau pole again cancels on the two Gram constraints and the numerator falls into $S_6$ orbits of subgraphs of $K_6$, the construction becomes a practical framework for all multiplicities; if not, the five-point structure is a low-multiplicity accident.
  • The paper frames the resummed correlator as a cosmological analogue of the Veneziano amplitude but does not check the analogue of flat-space ultraviolet softness; a direct test would be whether $I_{12345}$ stays finite in the total-energy limit $E \to 0$, where ordinary EFT correlators diverge.
  • If the rationality result carries over to the graviton bilinear through cosmological weight-shifting operators, the entire class of holographic higher-spin correlators in dS4 would be governed by the same $K_n$ graph combinatorics, giving a momentum-space counterpart to the Grassmannian representation already found at four points.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies momentum-space boundary correlators in the conjectural dS4 minimal higher-spin/vector-model duality. It reviews how connected n-point scalar correlators are represented by three-dimensional one-loop n-gon integrals, derives the rational four-point box result (Eq. 3.13), and presents a spurious-free five-point pentagon representation, Eq. (4.30), whose numerator is organized by S5 orbits of triangles, Hamiltonian cycles, and triangle complements of K5. It then verifies the conformal Ward identities for the four- and five-point correlators and analyzes their soft, collapsed, and Ptolemy singularities, using these structures to propose a combinatorial bootstrap for higher multiplicities.

Significance. If the five-point result is correct, the paper provides a concrete exact higher-point correlator in a de Sitter higher-spin model, with a clean graph-theoretic organization and a detailed singularity analysis that goes beyond the previously known four-point result. The derivation is anchored in standard Melrose reduction and is cross-checked in several independent ways: the four-point result reproduces the known expression of [80], the pentagon numerator is checked numerically against the integral definition, and Appendix B provides an independent van Neerven-Vermaseren reduction. The conjectural dS/CFT dictionary affects the cosmological interpretation of the result but not its validity as a free-vector-model correlator; the rational functions themselves stand on their own. The paper is clearly written and the ancillary Mathematica notebook is a useful reproducibility aid.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2.2, Eq. (4.24)] The finite-field reconstruction of the physical numerator Nphys is the load-bearing step of the paper, and its completeness is not established. The ansatz restricts each hγ to monomials of fixed degree in the squared distances and to terms invariant under the stabilizer, but the text does not prove that the true hγ lies in this span; it only states that using slightly more equations than unknowns avoids accidental rank deficiency. A polynomial system can agree at finitely many evaluation points yet differ globally, and a lift of coefficients from F_32003 to small integers is not by itself a proof that the lifted polynomial satisfies N5 = h1 Δ5 + h2 G5 over Q. I request either a complete symbolic derivation and verification of Eq. (4.30), or an explicit proof that the evaluation points separate the ansatz space, together with a rational reconstruction procedure (for example, multiple primes and an exact final check of the identity on the physical locus).
  2. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eqs. (4.21)-(4.22)] The claim that the distinct cycle monomials are independent and that the spurious pole must cancel coefficient-by-coefficient is asserted without proof. After gauge fixing, the κI(y) are polynomials in the nine component variables and are not independent: the Gram constraint G5 = 0 imposes one relation among the ten distance variables. The text does not rule out relations among the square-root monomials Xγ that could mix the coefficients rγ. Please supply the relevant algebraic-independence statement, or an explicit elimination/Gröbner basis computation showing that the expansion (4.21) is unique on the gauge-fixed locus.
  3. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.30)] The final five-point representation is given only through one representative coefficient for each of the three S5 orbits, with the full expanded numerator relegated to an ancillary notebook. Since Eq. (4.30) is the central result of the paper, the text should either display the complete numerator or provide an explicit algorithmic recipe that generates it from Eqs. (4.26)-(4.29) and verifies it against the integral. As written, the reader cannot independently check the identity without trusting the notebook and the finite-field reconstruction described in Sec. 4.2.2.
  4. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (5.9)] The general-n physical denominator Dphys = ∏_{kI ∈ En} kI ∏_i F^{(i)}_{++} is presented as a statement, but spurious-pole cancellation has only been established for n = 4 and n = 5. For n ≥ 6, the iterated Melrose reduction introduces many additional Landau polynomials whose cancellation is not analyzed. The text should explicitly label Eq. (5.9) as a conjecture or provide a proof, since the combinatorial bootstrap proposed in Sec. 6 relies on this extrapolation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.7)] The Källén function λ(a,b,c) is used without definition; please define it at first use for readers not familiar with this notation.
  2. [Sec. 2.2.2, Eqs. (2.17)-(2.20)] The notation f^{(n)}_{l1···lD+1} in Eq. (2.19) is introduced before the meaning of the final set {l1,...,lD+1} is fully explained; a sentence clarifying that these are the surviving internal momenta would improve readability.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.1, Eq. (4.12)] The dual vertex x5 is defined as (1+y1+y4+y7, y2+y5+y8, y3+y6+y9), but x5 should equal -k5 after momentum conservation; the text should explicitly state that k5 is fixed by k5 = -(k1+k2+k3+k4) before this parametrization.
  4. [Sec. 5.2, Eq. (5.11)] The product limits in the soft and collapsed formulas use cyclic indices that are somewhat opaque; a sentence explaining the convention (or rewriting the products with explicit cyclic ranges) would prevent misreading.
  5. [Sec. 6] The discussion of the Grassmannian formulation cites the companion paper [81] for the four-point result; it would be helpful to state explicitly which parts of the present five-point result depend only on the vector-model computation and which parts rely on the conjectural holographic dictionary.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; central results are derived from the integral definition and independently checked.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from the free-vector-model correlator expressed as the one-loop n-gon integral (2.5), which is an input from the Q-model [80] rather than an output claimed here. The box result (3.13) is obtained by the standard Melrose reduction (2.20) and is explicitly checked against the earlier independent computation in [80]. The pentagon result is not fitted to a target: the gauge-fixed integral N_gf is obtained from the reduction (4.4), and the spurious-pole cancellation is formulated as the ideal membership N5 = h1 Δ5 + h2 G5. The physical numerator is then reconstructed by matching the ansatz (4.24) to the known gauge-fixed polynomial hγ(y), with the small-integer modular lift verified at additional kinematic points and the final expression numerically checked against the integral (4.1). No equation is defined in terms of the result it is supposed to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations, including [2] and [81], are used only for background or cross-checks: the SCT generator form is rederived in Appendix C, and the Grassmannian four-point form is not needed for the pentagon claim, so they are not load-bearing. The main caveat is computational rather than circular: the finite-field reconstruction and modular lift are not replaced by a fully exhibited symbolic proof, so an ansatz-completeness or lift error would invalidate Eq. (4.30), but this is a verification gap, not circularity. The conjectural dS/CFT dictionary from [79,80] is an input whose failure would affect interpretation, not the internal derivation of the correlators.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on standard integral-reduction mathematics and on the conjectural Q-model dictionary; there are no new physical particles or forces and no free parameters fitted to data. The finite-field reconstruction uses an arbitrary prime p=32003 as a computational tool, not as a physical parameter.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Q-model, a free O(N) vector model in a Gaussian Hartle-Hawking state, computes boundary correlators of minimal higher-spin gravity in dS4 exactly.
    Sec. 2.1: the paper adopts this conjectural holographic dictionary from [79,80]; it is load-bearing for interpreting the computed functions as de Sitter gravity observables.
  • standard math Melrose reduction: any n-gon integral in D dimensions reduces to D-gons with coefficients given by ratios of Cayley-minors of the modified Cayley matrix.
    Sec. 2.2 and Appendix A derive and apply the linear reduction (2.17), iterated reduction (2.18), and quadratic reduction (2.20).
  • standard math The three-dimensional star-triangle formula evaluates the triangle integral as I123 = 1/(k1 k2 k3).
    Sec. 2.2.3 uses this classic result [98] as the base of the reduction hierarchy.
  • domain assumption Physical five-point kinematics in D=3 satisfy exactly one Gram relation, detY5=0, among the ten distance variables; the gauge-fixed parametrization (4.11) covers the physical locus.
    Sec. 4.1: dimension counting gives 9 independent degrees of freedom and the paper imposes the Gram constraint to eliminate the spurious pole.
  • domain assumption The Feynman-parameter representation (3.18) and positivity of the second Symanzik polynomial in the Euclidean region imply that Euclidean branches of the Landau locus are spurious and only the analytically continued Ptolemy branch is physical.
    Sec. 3.2: this analyticity argument is used to identify F++ as the only four-point physical singularity and to justify the cancellation of the other branches.
  • standard math Momentum-space conformal Ward identities of the form (5.3) with special conformal generators (C.1) characterize conformal scalar correlators.
    Appendix C derives these identities; Sec. 5.1 verifies them for the box and pentagon expressions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Higher-Spin Correlators in dS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W4Y5TESS

@misc{pith2026260805278,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Higher-Spin Correlators in dS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W4Y5TESS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05278}
}
abstract

We study momentum-space correlators in minimal higher-spin gravity in $\mathrm{dS}_4$ using its holographic vector-model description. Connected $n$-point functions in this model are represented by three-dimensional one-loop integrals and are rational functions of the boundary kinematics. We show that the four-point function displays a nontrivial geometric feature: its physical singularity is governed by a Ptolemy relation for the dual momentum quadrilateral. At five points, the pentagon integral introduces an apparent leading Landau singularity, which we show is spurious and disappears once the Gram constraint is imposed. We derive a representation of the five-point function free of spurious singularities and organized in terms of graph-theoretic building blocks. We then verify the conformal invariance of these correlators and discuss their behavior in the soft, collapsed, and Ptolemy limits. This structure suggests a combinatorial bootstrap for higher-spin correlators at general multiplicity, in which conformal invariance and the physical singularities emerge from the underlying graph combinatorics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

145 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [80]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, R. Monten and Z. Sun,Higher Spin de Sitter Hilbert Space,JHEP 10(2019) 071, [1711.10037]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [1]

    Arkani-Hamed and J

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena,Cosmological Collider Physics,1503.08043

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel,The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities,JHEP04(2020) 105, [1811.00024]

    arXiv 2020

  4. [3]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel,The cosmological bootstrap: weight-shifting operators and scalar seeds,JHEP12(2020) 204, [1910.14051]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    Baumann, C

    D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel,The cosmological bootstrap: spinning correlators from symmetries and factorization,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 071, [2005.04234]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space,JHEP 02(2020) 098, [1907.01143]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [6]

    Goodhew, S

    H. Goodhew, S. Jazayeri and E. Pajer,The Cosmological Optical Theorem,JCAP04 (2021) 021, [2009.02898]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [7]

    Pajer,Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,JCAP01(2021) 023, [2010.12818]

    E. Pajer,Building a Boostless Bootstrap for the Bispectrum,JCAP01(2021) 023, [2010.12818]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 145 references
  1. [8]

    Melville and E

    S. Melville and E. Pajer,Cosmological Cutting Rules,JHEP05(2021) 249, [2103.09832]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Baumann, W.-M

    D. Baumann, W.-M. Chen, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel,Linking the singularities of cosmological correlators,JHEP09(2022) 010, [2106.05294]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Jazayeri, E

    S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer and D. Stefanyszyn,From Locality and Unitarity to Cosmological Correlators,JHEP10(2021) 065, [2103.08649]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,From dS to AdS and back,JHEP12(2021) 074, [2109.02725]

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Bonifacio, E

    J. Bonifacio, E. Pajer and D.-G. Wang,From Amplitudes to Contact Cosmological Correlators,JHEP10(2021) 001, [2106.15468]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Hogervorst, J

    M. Hogervorst, J. a. Penedones and K. S. Vaziri,Towards the non-perturbative cosmological bootstrap,JHEP02(2023) 162, [2107.13871]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    G. L. Pimentel and D.-G. Wang,Boostless Cosmological Collider Bootstrap,JHEP10 (2022) 177, [2205.00013]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Jazayeri and S

    S. Jazayeri and S. Renaux-Petel,Cosmological bootstrap in slow motion,JHEP12(2022) 137, [2205.10340]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Baumann et al.,Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,2203.08121

    D. Baumann et al.,Snowmass White Paper: The Cosmological Bootstrap,2203.08121

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. L. Bourjaily, F. Cachazo, A. B. Goncharov, A. Postnikov and J. Trnka,Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes. Cambridge University Press, 4, 2016, 10.1017/CBO9781316091548

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    L. J. Dixon,A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Particle Physics: The Higgs Boson and Beyond, pp. 31–67, 2014,1310.5353, DOI

    2014 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes,1308.1697

    arXiv

  13. [20]

    Cheung,TASI lectures on scattering amplitudes., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics, pp

    C. Cheung,TASI lectures on scattering amplitudes., inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics, pp. 571–623, 2018,1708.03872, DOI. – 41 –

    2018 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Caron-Huot, L

    S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, ¨O. G¨ urdo˘ gan et al.,The Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap forN= 4 Super Yang-Mills Amplitudes,PoSCORFU2019 (2020) 003, [2005.06735]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Arkani-Hamed, P

    N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa and A. Postnikov,Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe,1709.02813

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel, Differential equations for cosmological correlators,JHEP09(2025) 009, [2312.05303]

    2025 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, A. Hillman, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G. L. Pimentel, Kinematic Flow and the Emergence of Time,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 031602, [2312.05300]

    2025 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Arkani-Hamed, C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo and F. Vaz˜ ao,Cosmohedra,JHEP11(2025) 029, [2412.19881]

    2025

  19. [26]

    S. De, S. Paranjape, A. Pokraka, M. Spradlin and A. Volovich,Hidden zeros of the cosmological wavefunction,JHEP07(2025) 174, [2503.23579]

    2025 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Ardila-Mantilla, N

    F. Ardila-Mantilla, N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo and F. Vaz˜ ao,Combinatorics of the Cosmohedron,2603.03425

  21. [28]

    Chen and Y

    X. Chen and Y. Wang,Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 063511, [0909.0496]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Chen and Y

    X. Chen and Y. Wang,Quasi-Single Field Inflation and Non-Gaussianities,JCAP04 (2010) 027, [0911.3380]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Baumann and D

    D. Baumann and D. Green,Signatures of Supersymmetry from the Early Universe,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 103520, [1109.0292]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Assassi, D

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann and D. Green,On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,JCAP11(2012) 047, [1204.4207]

    2012 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Noumi, M

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yokoyama,Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,JHEP06(2013) 051, [1211.1624]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [33]

    X. Chen, M. H. Namjoo and Y. Wang,Quantum Primordial Standard Clocks,JCAP02 (2016) 013, [1509.03930]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [34]

    H. Lee, D. Baumann and G. L. Pimentel,Non-Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,JHEP 12(2016) 040, [1607.03735]

    2016 arXiv

  28. [35]

    X. Chen, Y. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,JHEP04(2017) 058, [1610.06597]

    2017 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Wang and Z.-Z

    L.-T. Wang and Z.-Z. Xianyu,In Search of Large Signals at the Cosmological Collider, JHEP02(2020) 044, [1910.12876]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Bodas, S

    A. Bodas, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,The Scalar Chemical Potential in Cosmological Collider Physics,JHEP02(2021) 079, [2010.04727]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Qin and Z.-Z

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Helical Inflation Correlators: Partial Mellin-Barnes and Bootstrap Equations,JHEP04(2023) 059, [2208.13790]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Jazayeri, S

    S. Jazayeri, S. Renaux-Petel and D. Werth,Shapes of the cosmological low-speed collider, JCAP12(2023) 035, [2307.01751]. – 42 –

    2023 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Bodas, E

    A. Bodas, E. Broadberry, R. Sundrum and Z. Xu,Charged loops at the cosmological collider with chemical potential,JHEP01(2026) 083, [2507.22978]

    2026

  34. [41]

    J. You, L. Song, C. Han, H.-J. He, X. Chen and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Cosmological Collider Signatures from Right-Handed Neutrino Loop,2605.21419

    arXiv

  35. [42]

    Chowdhury, A

    C. Chowdhury, A. Lipstein, J. Mei, I. Sachs and P. Vanhove,The Subtle Simplicity of Cosmological Correlators,JHEP03(2025) 007, [2312.13803]

    2025 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Benincasa, G

    P. Benincasa, G. Brunello, M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia and F. Vaz˜ ao,On one-loop corrections to the Bunch-Davies wavefunction of the universe,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085016, [2408.16386]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Arkani-Hamed, R

    N. Arkani-Hamed, R. Glew and F. Vaz˜ ao,Correlators are simpler than wavefunctions, 2512.23795

    arXiv

  38. [45]

    G. L. Pimentel and T. Westerdijk,On Cosmological Correlators at One Loop,2601.00952

    arXiv

  39. [46]

    Farren, C

    A. Farren, C. McCulloch, E. Pajer and X. Tong,All-Loop Renormalization and the Phase of the de Sitter Wavefunction,2603.08794

  40. [47]

    Chowdhury, S

    C. Chowdhury, S. Jazayeri, A. Lipstein, J. Marshall, J. Mei and I. Sachs,Cosmological Correlator Discontinuities from Scattering Amplitudes,2602.03841

  41. [48]

    Chowdhury, S

    C. Chowdhury, S. He, Y.-X. Su and D. Yang,On the simplicity of de Sitter correlators, 2604.26421

    arXiv

  42. [49]

    Green, M

    D. Green, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore, E. Silverstein and M. Zaldarriaga,Anomalous Dimensions and Non-Gaussianity,JHEP10(2013) 171, [1301.2630]

    2013 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Kumar and R

    S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,Seeing Higher-Dimensional Grand Unification In Primordial Non-Gaussianities,JHEP04(2019) 120, [1811.11200]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Aoki,Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,JCAP04(2023) 002, [2301.07920]

    S. Aoki,Continuous spectrum on cosmological collider,JCAP04(2023) 002, [2301.07920]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Hubisz, S

    J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, H. Li and B. Sambasivam,Cosmological quasiparticles and the cosmological collider,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023543, [2408.08951]

    2025 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Kumar and M

    S. Kumar and M. Nee,Warped dimensions at the cosmological collider,JHEP04(2026) 035, [2510.19900]

    2026

  47. [54]

    Chakraborty,Primordial non-Gaussianity from light compact scalars,JHEP11(2025) 023, [2501.07672]

    P. Chakraborty,Primordial non-Gaussianity from light compact scalars,JHEP11(2025) 023, [2501.07672]

    2025

  48. [55]

    G. L. Pimentel and C. Yang,Strongly coupled sectors in inflation: gapless theories and unparticles,JHEP04(2026) 146, [2503.17840]

    2026 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Jiang, G

    Y. Jiang, G. L. Pimentel and C. Yang,Strongly coupled sectors in inflation: gapped theories of unparticles,JHEP06(2026) 125, [2512.23796]

    2026 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Aoki,Primordial Correlators from a Kaluza-Klein Graviton Continuum,2608.01762

    S. Aoki,Primordial Correlators from a Kaluza-Klein Graviton Continuum,2608.01762

    arXiv

  51. [58]

    Veneziano,Construction of a crossing-symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories,Nuovo Cim

    G. Veneziano,Construction of a crossing-symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories,Nuovo Cim. A57(1968) 190–197

    1968

  52. [59]

    Caron-Huot, Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Z. Komargodski, A. Sever and A. Zhiboedov,Strings from Massive Higher Spins: The Asymptotic Uniqueness of the Veneziano Amplitude,JHEP10(2017) 026, [1607.04253]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Veneziano Variations: How Unique are String Amplitudes?, JHEP01(2023) 122, [2210.12163]. – 43 –

    2023 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Stringy Dynamics from an Amplitudes Bootstrap,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 026011, [2302.12263]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Arkani-Hamed, C

    N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Cheung, C. Figueiredo and G. N. Remmen,Multiparticle Factorization and the Rigidity of String Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 091601, [2312.07652]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Cheung and G

    C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen,Bespoke Dual Resonance,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 086009, [2308.03833]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Cheung, A

    C. Cheung, A. Hillman and G. N. Remmen,Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 251601, [2406.02665]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Cheung, A

    C. Cheung, A. Hillman and G. N. Remmen,Uniqueness Criteria for the Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 086034, [2408.03362]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Wan and S.-Y

    S.-L. Wan and S.-Y. Zhou,Analytic Bootstrap of the Veneziano Amplitude,2605.11084

    arXiv

  60. [67]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov,Looking for a bulk point,JHEP01 (2017) 013, [1509.03612]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [68]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Consistent equations for interacting gauge fields of all spins in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Lett. B243(1990) 378–382

    1990

  62. [69]

    M. A. Vasiliev,Nonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fields in (A)dS(d), Phys. Lett. B567(2003) 139–151, [hep-th/0304049]

    2003 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Giombi and I

    S. Giombi and I. R. Klebanov,One Loop Tests of Higher Spin AdS/CFT,JHEP12(2013) 068, [1308.2337]

    2013 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law and Z. Sun,Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,JHEP01(2022) 088, [2009.12464]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Anninos, C

    D. Anninos, C. Baracco, V. A. Letsios and B. M¨ uhlmann,dS 4 Metamorphosis,2602.19812

    arXiv

  66. [73]

    Sundborg,Stringy gravity, interacting tensionless strings and massless higher spins, hep-th/0103247

    B. Sundborg,Stringy gravity, interacting tensionless strings and massless higher spins, hep-th/0103247

    arXiv

  67. [74]

    Mikhailov,Notes on higher spin symmetries,hep-th/0201019

    A. Mikhailov,Notes on higher spin symmetries,hep-th/0201019

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model,Phys. Lett. B550(2002) 213–219, [hep-th/0210114]

    2002 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell,Massless higher spins and holography,Nucl. Phys. B644(2002) 303–370, [hep-th/0205131]

    2002 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin,Higher Spin Gauge Theory and Holography: The Three-Point Functions,JHEP09(2010) 115, [0912.3462]

    2010 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Giombi and X

    S. Giombi and X. Yin,Higher Spin Gauge Theory and the CriticalO(N)Model,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 086005, [1105.4011]

    2012 arXiv

  72. [79]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 015009, [1108.5735]

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    De and H

    S. De and H. Lee,The Vasiliev Grassmannian,2603.24656. – 44 –

  74. [82]

    Arundine, D

    M. Arundine, D. Baumann, M. H. G. Lee, G. L. Pimentel and F. Rost,The Cosmological Grassmannian,2602.07117

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D. K. S. and A. A. Rao,TheN= 1Super-Grassmannian for CFT 3 and a Foray on AdS and Cosmological Correlators,2604.07446

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    A. Bala, S. Jain, D. K. S. and A. A. Rao,Super-Grassmannians forN= 2to4SCFT 3: From AdS4 Correlators toN= 4SYM scattering Amplitudes,2604.07503

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    Huang, C.-K

    Y.-t. Huang, C.-K. Kuo, Y. Liu and J. Mei,Beyond Discontinuities: Cosmological WFCs from the Supersymmetric Orthogonal Grassmannian,2604.08512

    arXiv

  78. [86]

    Arundine and G

    M. Arundine and G. L. Pimentel,Cosmological Collider in the Grassmannian,2605.21581

    arXiv

  79. [87]

    D’Andrea and M

    C. D’Andrea and M. Sombra,The Cayley-Menger determinant is irreducible forn≥3, Siberian Math. J.46(2005) 71–76, [math/0406359]

    2005 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Calvo Cortes, H

    V. Calvo Cortes, H. Frost and B. Sturmfels,Kinematic Stratifications,2503.09571

  81. [89]

    D. B. Melrose,Reduction of Feynman diagrams,Nuovo Cim. A40(1965) 181–213

    1965

  82. [90]

    Giombi,Higher Spin — CFT Duality, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp

    S. Giombi,Higher Spin — CFT Duality, inTheoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 137–214, 2017, 1607.02967, DOI

    2017 arXiv

  83. [91]

    V. E. Didenko and E. D. Skvortsov,Elements of Vasiliev Theory,Lect. Notes Phys.1028 (2024) 269–456, [1401.2975]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    D. E. Diaz and H. Dorn,On the AdS higher spin / O(N) vector model correspondence: Degeneracy of the holographic image,JHEP07(2006) 022, [hep-th/0603084]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Sleight and M

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna,Higher-Spin Gauge Theories and Bulk Locality,Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(2018) 171604, [1704.07859]

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Ponomarev,A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,Universe4 (2018) 2, [1710.00403]

    D. Ponomarev,A Note on (Non)-Locality in Holographic Higher Spin Theories,Universe4 (2018) 2, [1710.00403]

    2018 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Ponomarev, E

    D. Ponomarev, E. Sezgin and E. Skvortsov,On one loop corrections in higher spin gravity, JHEP11(2019) 138, [1904.01042]

    2019 arXiv

  88. [96]

    W. L. van Neerven and J. A. M. Vermaseren,Large loop integrals,Phys. Lett. B137(1984) 241–244

    1984

  89. [97]

    S. Jain, R. R. John and V. Malvimat,Momentum space spinning correlators and higher spin equations in three dimensions,JHEP11(2020) 049, [2005.07212]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Symanzik,On Calculations in conformal invariant field theories,Lett

    K. Symanzik,On Calculations in conformal invariant field theories,Lett. Nuovo Cim.3 (1972) 734–738

    1972

  91. [99]

    A. C. Petkou,Evaluating the AdS dual of the critical O(N) vector model,JHEP03(2003) 049, [hep-th/0302063]

    2003 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Sezgin and P

    E. Sezgin and P. Sundell,Holography in 4D (super) higher spin theories and a test via cubic scalar couplings,JHEP07(2005) 044, [hep-th/0305040]

    2005 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Devriendt, H

    K. Devriendt, H. Friedman, B. Reinke and B. Sturmfels,The Two Lives of the Grassmannian,Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math.17(2025) 8, [2401.03684]

    2025 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Mizera,Crossing symmetry in the planar limit,Phys

    S. Mizera,Crossing symmetry in the planar limit,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 045003, [2104.12776]. – 45 –

    2021 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions,JHEP03(2012) 091, [1112.1967]

    2012 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Implications of conformal invariance in momentum space,JHEP03(2014) 111, [1304.7760]

    2014 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Binoth, G

    T. Binoth, G. Heinrich and N. Kauer,A Numerical evaluation of the scalar hexagon integral in the physical region,Nucl. Phys. B654(2003) 277–300, [hep-ph/0210023]

    2003 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Duplancic and B

    G. Duplancic and B. Nizic,Reduction method for dimensionally regulated one loop N point Feynman integrals,Eur. Phys. J. C35(2004) 105–118, [hep-ph/0303184]

    2004 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr and V. A. Smirnov,The massless hexagon integral in D = 6 dimensions,Phys. Lett. B703(2011) 363–365, [1104.2781]

    2011 arXiv

  100. [108]

    L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond and J. M. Henn,The one-loop six-dimensional hexagon integral and its relation to MHV amplitudes in N=4 SYM,JHEP06(2011) 100, [1104.2787]

    2011 arXiv

  101. [109]

    J. M. Henn, A. Matijaˇ si´ c and J. Miczajka,One-loop hexagon integral to higher orders in the dimensional regulator,JHEP01(2023) 096, [2210.13505]

    2023 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Benincasa,Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefuncton of the Universe for Light States, 1909.02517

    P. Benincasa,Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefuncton of the Universe for Light States, 1909.02517

    1909 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Benincasa and G

    P. Benincasa and G. Dian,The geometry of cosmological correlators,SciPost Phys.18 (2025) 105, [2401.05207]

    2025 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Glew and T

    R. Glew and T. Lukowski,Amplitubes: graph cosmohedra,JHEP09(2025) 074, [2502.17564]

    2025 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Hang and C

    Y. Hang and C. Shen,A note on kinematic flow and differential equations for two-site one-loop graph in FR W spacetime,JHEP09(2025) 209, [2410.17192]

    2025

  106. [114]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew and H. Lee,Kinematic flow for cosmological loop integrands, JHEP07(2025) 131, [2410.17994]

    2025 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Baumann, H

    D. Baumann, H. Goodhew, A. Joyce, H. Lee, G. L. Pimentel and T. Westerdijk,Geometry of kinematic flow,JHEP05(2026) 211, [2504.14890]

    2026 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Glew and A

    R. Glew and A. Pokraka,Kinematic flow from the flow of cuts,JHEP06(2026) 158, [2508.11568]

    2026 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Baumann, A

    D. Baumann, A. Joyce, H. Lee and K. Salehi Vaziri,Differential Equations for Massive Correlators,2604.08658

    arXiv

  110. [118]

    Mazloumi and X

    P. Mazloumi and X. Xu,Cluster algebras for cosmological correlators,JHEP03(2026) 256, [2512.14854]

    2026

  111. [119]

    Capuano, L

    M. Capuano, L. Ferro, T. Lukowski and A. Palazio,Cosmology meets cluster algebra, 2512.14859

  112. [120]

    Capuano, L

    M. Capuano, L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, A. Palazio and Y.-Q. Zhang,Generalised Cluster Adjacency for Cosmology,2603.09965

  113. [121]

    Paranjape, M

    S. Paranjape, M. Skowronek, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich and H.-C. Weng,Cluster Bootstrap for Cosmological Correlators,2603.08670

  114. [122]

    Ferro, T

    L. Ferro, T. Lukowski, L. Ren, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, H.-C. Weng et al.,de Sitter Wavefunction from Quadrangular Polylogarithms: Chain Graphs,2605.06542. – 46 –

    arXiv

  115. [123]

    Liu and Z.-Z

    H. Liu and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Massive inflationary amplitudes: differential equations and complete solutions for general trees,JHEP09(2025) 183, [2412.07843]

    2025 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Gr¨ afe and D

    J. Gr¨ afe and D. Werth,All Tree-Level Massive Cosmological Correlators via Spectral Gluing,2607.18223

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Bzowski, P

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Conformaln-point functions in momentum space,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 131602, [1910.10162]

    2020 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Corian` o, M

    C. Corian` o, M. M. Maglio and D. Theofilopoulos,Four-Point Functions in Momentum Space: Conformal Ward Identities in the Scalar/Tensor case,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 540, [1912.01907]

    2020 arXiv

  119. [127]

    S. Jain, R. R. John and V. Malvimat,Constraining momentum space correlators using slightly broken higher spin symmetry,JHEP04(2021) 231, [2008.08610]

    2021 arXiv

  120. [128]

    P. Jain, S. Jain, B. Sahoo, K. S. Dhruva and A. Zade,Mapping Large N Slightly Broken Higher Spin (SBHS) theory correlators to free theory correlators,JHEP12(2023) 173, [2207.05101]

    2023 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Anninos, V

    D. Anninos, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Cosmological Shapes of Higher-Spin Gravity,JCAP04(2019) 045, [1902.01251]

    2019 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Lee and X

    H. Lee and X. Wang,Cosmological double-copy relations,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) L061702, [2212.11282]

    2023 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Lee and X

    H. Lee and X. Wang,Amplitude basis for conformal correlators,JHEP03(2024) 147, [2312.17312]

    2024 arXiv

  124. [132]

    A. E. Lipstein and L. Mason,Amplitudes of 3d Yang Mills Theory,JHEP01(2013) 009, [1207.6176]

    2013 arXiv

  125. [133]

    R. G. Leigh and A. C. Petkou,Holography of the N=1 higher spin theory on AdS(4),JHEP 06(2003) 011, [hep-th/0304217]

    2003 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Aharony, G

    O. Aharony, G. Gur-Ari and R. Yacoby,d=3 Bosonic Vector Models Coupled to Chern-Simons Gauge Theories,JHEP03(2012) 037, [1110.4382]

    2012 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Constraining conformal field theories with a slightly broken higher spin symmetry,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 104003, [1204.3882]

    2013 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Chang, S

    C.-M. Chang, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma and X. Yin,ABJ Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings,J. Phys. A46(2013) 214009, [1207.4485]

    2013 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Chang, A

    C.-M. Chang, A. Pathak and A. Strominger,Non-Minimal Higher-Spin DS4/CFT3, 1309.7413

    arXiv

  130. [138]

    Anninos, R

    D. Anninos, R. Mahajan, D. Radicevic and E. Shaghoulian,Chern-Simons-Ghost Theories and de Sitter Space,JHEP01(2015) 074, [1405.1424]

    2015 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Hertog, G

    T. Hertog, G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, T. Van Riet and V. Venken,Supersymmetric dS/CFT,JHEP02(2018) 024, [1709.06024]

    2018 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Brust and K

    C. Brust and K. Hinterbichler,Free□ k scalar conformal field theory,JHEP02(2017) 066, [1607.07439]

    2017 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Brust and K

    C. Brust and K. Hinterbichler,Partially Massless Higher-Spin Theory,JHEP02(2017) 086, [1610.08510]. – 47 –

    2017 arXiv

  134. [142]

    McFadden and K

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Holography for cosmology,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 021301, [0907.5542]

    2010 arXiv

  135. [143]

    McFadden and K

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis,Holographic Non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2011) 013, [1011.0452]

    2011 arXiv

  136. [144]

    R. K. Ellis, Z. Kunszt, K. Melnikov and G. Zanderighi,One-loop calculations in quantum field theory: from Feynman diagrams to unitarity cuts,Phys. Rept.518(2012) 141–250, [1105.4319]

    2012 arXiv

  137. [145]

    G. J. van Oldenborgh and J. A. M. Vermaseren,New Algorithms for One Loop Integrals,Z. Phys. C46(1990) 425–438. – 48 –

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.