Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 38 references

Information--Theoretic Black Hole Entropy II: Infrared Gravity and Charged/Rotating Extensions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the Nernst-compatible, information-theoretic black hole entropy can be realized as the Wald entropy of an infrared-deformed gravity action, and that for Kerr-Newman black holes it follows by replacing the ADM mass…

desk verdict A clearly written existence proof whose central matching computation is asserted but not shown, and which rests on an unpublished companion paper; worth refereeing with a demand for the missing derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05801 v1 pith:XQTXMFE7 submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th gr-qchep-ph

Alex Kehagias This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qchep-ph
keywords blackholeentropyNernstthirdlawKullback-LeiblerdivergenceWaldinfrareddeformationofgravityirreduciblemassKerr-Newmanholeseffectivecosmologicalconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the third-law-compatible black hole entropy introduced in the companion paper—a Kullback-Leibler divergence describing an entropy deficit—is not an isolated formula but the thermodynamic entropy of a concrete infrared deformation of General Relativity. It shows perturbatively that a modified gravitational action containing a constant term and an inverse-curvature invariant reproduces both the surface-gravity temperature and the Wald Noether-charge entropy of the information-theoretic result, to linear order in the deformation couplings. To extend the construction to Kerr-Newman black holes, it proposes replacing the ADM mass with the irreducible mass, which restores the area-law limit while giving a universal, charge- and spin-independent zero-temperature endpoint. If correct, the paper would put the Nernst third law on the same footing as the first and second laws, and tie the scale that enforces it to a positive effective cosmological constant.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the relative-entropy identity $S_{\rm bh}(M)=N D_{\rm KL}(p\|\tfrac12)$ with $p=\tfrac12(1+M/M_0)$, which converts an externally imposed third-law requirement into a concrete functional form for the entropy. On the gravitational side, the machinery is the infrared action (3.22) with a cosmological-constant-like term and the inverse-curvature invariant $I_1$; its coupling constants are fixed by matching the Wald Noether-charge entropy and surface-gravity temperature of a static spherically symmetric solution to the information-theoretic formulas. On the charged/rotating side, the machinery is the replacement $M\to M_{\rm irr}$ together with the Christodoulou-Ruffini relation $M^2 = (M_{\rm irr}+Q^2/4G_N M_{\rm irr})^2 + J^2/(4G_N^2 M_{\rm irr}^2)$, which expresses the ADM mass in terms of the irreducible mass and the conserved charges.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to compute the exact, non-perturbative Wald entropy for the action (3.22) on its full static, spherically symmetric numerical solution; if the entropy or temperature differs from $S_{\rm bh}(M)$ beyond linear order in $c_0,c_1$, the claimed equivalence fails. Alternatively, one could verify whether any action of the form (3.3) can reproduce $S_{\rm bh}$ to all orders in $M/M_0$; if the matching cannot be extended past the first few corrections, the existence proof would only hold in a restricted regime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the entropy function $S_{\rm bh}(M)$ from the companion work, Eq. (2.5), is the Wald entropy of an effective gravity action modified by infrared terms. For the explicit action (3.22), obtained by adding $-c_0 M_0^{-2}$ and $c_1 M_0^{-4} I_1$ to the two-derivative gravitational action with $I_1 = R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}/(R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R^{\rho\sigma\lambda\kappa}R_{\lambda\kappa}{}^{\mu\nu})$, the perturbative black-hole solution yields $S_W = 4\pi G_N M^2 + 16\pi c_0 G_N^3 M^4/(3M_0^2) - 32\pi c_1 G_N^5 M^6/(3M_0^4)$, which matches the expansion of $S_{\rm bh}$ when $c_0 = 1/(8G_N^2)$ and $c_1 = -1/(40G_N^4)$. The same matching produces a positive effective cosmological constant $\Lambda_{\rm eff} = 1/(16G_N^2 M_0^2)$, so the large microscopic parameter $N=M_0^2/M_P^2$ explains the smallness of $\Lambda_{\rm eff}$. For Kerr-Newman black holes, the paper generalizes the formula by replacing $M$ with the irreducible mass $M_{\rm irr}$, defined from the horizon area and the Christodoulou-Ruffini mass formula; the temperature then has two distinct zero-temperature regimes, geometric extremality and the statistical endpoint $M_{\rm irr}\to M_0$, only the latter implementing the Nernst condition.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the companion paper's entropy formula $S_{\rm bh}(M)$, which assumes the Nernst third law applies to black holes and that $\mathrm{d}^2 S/\mathrm{d}M^2$ has only a simple pole at $M=M_0$; if that formula is wrong, the deformed action engineered to match it and the irreducible-mass extension have no foundation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The area-law entropy becomes the leading $1/N$ approximation to a relative entropy; corrections are parametrically $\sim M^2/M_0^2$ and could be searched for in precision black-hole thermodynamics.
  • The infrared deformation fixes a positive effective cosmological constant $\Lambda_{\rm eff} \sim M_P^2/N$, so the observed smallness of the cosmological constant is mapped to a large number of microscopic bits rather than a separate fine-tuning.
  • For Kerr-Newman black holes, entropy and temperature depend only on the irreducible mass, so reversible extraction of rotational or electromagnetic energy leaves the entropy unchanged; the Nernst endpoint at $M_{\rm irr}=M_0$ is universal, independent of $J$ and $Q$.
  • Geometric extremality and the statistical freezing point are distinct: at extremality the Hawking temperature vanishes through a mechanical factor, while the microscopic ensemble continues to fluctuate unless $M_{\rm irr}=M_0$.
  • The inferred values $N\simeq 5.5\times10^{121}$ and $M_0\simeq 7.4\times10^{60} M_P$ follow from identifying $\Lambda_{\rm eff}$ with the observed cosmological constant, giving the framework no free parameters in that sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same matching procedure is generic, many infrared actions in the class (3.3) share the same black-hole thermodynamics, so the paper's construction raises a classification question it does not answer: which invariants are physically selected.
  • The relation $\Lambda_{\rm eff} \sim M_P^2/N$ could be studied beyond static neutral black holes, for example in gravitational-wave ringdown or tidal deformability of the deformed solution; the paper does not analyze those observable signatures.
  • Because the KL entropy is a relative entropy rather than a state count, an independent microscopic realization of the $N$ Bernoulli bits would be needed to turn the construction into a predictive statistical model rather than a formal ensemble.
  • A natural next step is to ask whether the same infrared action survives consistency tests such as absence of ghosts or superluminality; the paper leaves the ultraviolet and dynamical stability properties of the deformation open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper investigates gravitational and Kerr-Newman extensions of an information-theoretic black-hole entropy introduced in a companion paper. It proposes an effective action (3.22) containing a constant term and an inverse-curvature invariant, and claims that, to linear order in the deformation couplings, the Wald entropy and surface-gravity temperature of its static spherically symmetric solutions reproduce the target entropy S_bh(M) of Eq. (2.5). The couplings are fixed by matching the perturbative Wald entropy to the small-M/M0 expansion of S_bh. The paper further proposes a generalization to Kerr-Newman black holes by replacing M with the irreducible mass M_irr, and derives the corresponding temperature from the first law. It also identifies an effective positive cosmological constant related to the microscopic parameter N and checks compatibility with the Nariai bound.

Significance. If the construction is correct, it demonstrates that a third-law-compatible black-hole entropy can arise from a local effective action, and it provides a concrete example of the general claim that modified gravity can reproduce non-area-law entropy. The KL-divergence interpretation and the connection between the cosmological constant and the number of Bernoulli bits are conceptually interesting, though the latter is a restatement of scales rather than a solution of the cosmological constant problem. The paper is clearly written and appropriately cautious in presenting the action as an existence proof and the Kerr-Newman sector as a proposal. The main weakness is that the central computation leading to the metric corrections is not shown, and the Kerr-Newman extension is not tied to the deformed action.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.2, Eqs. (3.10)–(3.13)] The metric corrections b1(r), b2(r), φ1(r), φ2(r) are presented without displaying the linearized field equations derived from the action (3.6)–(3.7) or the variation of the inverse-curvature invariant I1 of Eq. (3.7). These corrections are the sole input to the Wald entropy (3.19) and hence to the fixed couplings (3.21); an error in any coefficient would invalidate the existence claim. Please include the full field equations and the integration steps, or provide a companion notebook, so that the result can be independently verified.
  2. [3.2, after Eq. (3.24)] The statement that the surface-gravity temperature 'coincides with T = (dS_W/dM)^{-1}' is presented as a consistency check, but for a diffeomorphism-invariant theory the first law guarantees this equality once the metric is on-shell and the Wald entropy is used. The check is therefore not independent of the matching that fixed c0 and c1. The paper should either state that this is a consequence of the first law or identify a prediction that does not follow from the matching.
  3. [4, Eq. (4.10)] The Kerr-Newman extension by the replacement M → M_irr is a postulate and is not derived from the deformed action (3.22). No rotating or charged black-hole solution of the deformed theory is constructed, nor is it shown that the resulting entropy satisfies the first law with a geometric surface gravity. As written, Section 4 is a conjecture rather than an extension of the gravity-theory result. Please clarify the logical relation between Sections 3 and 4, or provide evidence that the proposal is compatible with the deformed dynamics.
minor comments (3)
  1. [References] Reference [14], the companion paper, is not locatable because it lacks an arXiv identifier or a journal reference; please provide one.
  2. [Introduction, Section 2.1] There are several typos: 'thord law' should be 'third law' in the Introduction; 'including including' appears in the same sentence; and 'recoved' should be 'recovered' in Section 2.1.
  3. [Section 4.3] The notation for the statistical temperature is inconsistent: 'Tens' in Eq. (4.22) and the following text appears as 'T ens' and 'Tens' in Eq. (4.23). Please use a single notation such as T_ens throughout.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

In Section 3 the Wald-entropy 'agreement' is a fit: c0 and c1 are fixed by equating (3.19) to (3.2), so the claimed reproduction of temperature and entropy, and the derived Lambda_eff relation, are identities after matching.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.1-3.2, Eqs. (3.20)-(3.21)]
    "Hence, the couplings c_i in (3.3) are fixed by demanding that the perturbative expansion of S matches the series (3.2), which in turn reproduces perturbatively the entropy formula of the previous section. ... Hence, matching Eqs (3.2) and (3.19), we find that the two expressions coincide, i.e., S_bh = S_W (3.20) for the following choice of the couplings c0 = 1/(8G_N^2), and c1 = -1/(40G_N^4) (3.21)."

    The two couplings are solved from the equality of the target expansion (3.2) and the computed Wald entropy (3.19). Equation (3.20) is therefore satisfied by construction at the perturbative order retained, not discovered. The subsequent statement that the surface-gravity temperature 'coincides with T=(dS_W/dM)^{-1}' is a consequence of the Wald identity once the entropy has been matched, so it does not independently confirm the information-theoretic temperature or entropy. The abstract's claim that temperature and entropy 'agree' with the information-theoretic results is a description of the fitting procedure, not a prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, Eq. (5.1)]
    "The constant term in the effective action (3.22) was determined by matching the derived perturbative entropy (3.19) to the expansion (3.2), thereby fixing the coefficient c0 = 1/(8G_N^2) in Eq. (3.21). ... the theory contains the effective cosmological constant Lambda_eff = c0/(2M0^2) = 1/(16G_N^2 M0^2) = 4*pi^2 M_P^2/N. (5.1)"

    The claimed connection between the observed cosmological constant and the microscopic parameter N ('the smallness of the cosmological constant is mapped onto the largeness of the parameter N') is a restatement of the entropy-matching condition: c0 was fixed by the fit in (3.21), and N was defined as M0^2/M_P^2 in (2.12). No independent input from the Bernoulli ensemble enters; the relation Lambda_eff ~ M_P^2/N is an algebraic rewrite of the fitted c0, so presenting it as a generated result overstates the derivation.

full rationale

The paper is candid that the construction is an existence proof and that the action is not unique; I find no uniqueness-imported-from-authors or ansatz-smuggling circularity. The Kerr-Newman extension in Section 4 is explicitly labeled a proposal ('The central proposal of this section is therefore simple'), and the KL-divergence rewriting in Section 2.3 is a mathematical identity given the definition of p. The companion paper [14] is a self-citation and supplies the target entropy (2.5), but the new step is an explicit reverse-engineering: the couplings c0 and c1 are chosen so that the Wald entropy matches that target. Thus the central 'agreement' in Eq. (3.20) and the temperature check following it are identities after fitting rather than independent confirmations, and the cosmological-constant/N relation in Eq. (5.1) inherits that fitted c0. This is partial circularity (score 6), not full equivalence, because the perturbative solution of the field equations, if independently verified, would indeed establish existence of some gravity theory reproducing the prescribed thermodynamics. The unshown metric corrections (3.10)-(3.13) are a verification gap rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unpublished companion paper, a chosen entropy ansatz, a specific but non-unique effective action, and an assumed perturbative solution. The numeric couplings are matched to the target entropy; no independent microscopic derivation or data are provided.

free parameters (4)
  • M0 (universal zero-temperature mass scale) = 7.4e60 M_P after setting Lambda_eff = Lambda_obs
    Introduced in the companion paper as the mass where T = 0; in Section 5 it is calibrated to the observed cosmological constant through Eq. (5.7), so it is not independently measured.
  • N = M0^2 / M_P^2 (number of Bernoulli bits) = 5.5e121
    Directly determined by M0 and Lambda_obs via Eq. (5.6); a dependent but model-defining parameter.
  • c0 (cosmological-constant-like coupling) = 1/(8 G_N^2)
    Chosen in Eq. (3.21) so that the perturbative Wald entropy (3.19) matches the target entropy expansion (3.2).
  • c1 (inverse-curvature operator coupling) = -1/(40 G_N^4)
    Also fixed by matching the M^6 term of S_bh; no independent determination is provided.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Nernst formulation of the third law should apply to black holes, so S must tend to a universal constant as T approaches 0.
    Adopted at the outset in Section 1 and Eq. (2.4); this is a physical principle that Wald and others have disputed for black holes, so it is an assumption, not a theorem.
  • ad hoc to paper The entropy formula S_bh(M) of Eq. (2.5) from the companion paper [14] is correct.
    The whole construction, including the action matching and the Kerr-Newman extension, starts from this formula; the companion paper is cited without a venue or identifier, so the derivation cannot be checked here.
  • domain assumption The metric is static and spherically symmetric with the ansatz (3.1).
    Restricts the gravity realization to Schwarzschild-type backgrounds; the generalization to Kerr-Newman is not derived from an action but postulated via M_irr.
  • ad hoc to paper The perturbative solution (3.10)-(3.13) solves the linearized field equations of the action (3.6)-(3.7).
    Stated in Section 3.2 without displaying the field equations or the computation; the paper only gives the final metric corrections and Wald entropy.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kerr-Newman entropy is obtained by the replacement M -> M_irr in S_bh.
    Section 4.1-4.2 proposes this as the central extension; it is not derived from the modified action, and the first law is then used to define the temperature.
invented entities (1)
  • Bernoulli ensemble of N independent bits underlying S_bh
    purpose: Provides a statistical interpretation of black hole entropy as a KL divergence and entropy deficit; fluctuations of M_irr are computed from this ensemble.
    No microscopic dynamics is given for the bits; the only handles are the entropy formula and the fluctuation variance (4.25), which are too small, 1/N around 10^-122, to be observed. The ensemble is an interpretive framework, not a detected object.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Information--Theoretic Black Hole Entropy II: Infrared Gravity and Charged/Rotating Extensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XQTXMFE7

@misc{pith2026260805801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Information--Theoretic Black Hole Entropy II: Infrared Gravity and Charged/Rotating Extensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XQTXMFE7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05801}
}
abstract

We investigate gravitational and Kerr-Newman extensions of an information-theoretic black-hole entropy that satisfies the Nernst formulation of the third law of thermodynamics. The entropy is identified with the Kullback-Leibler divergence between a mass-dependent Bernoulli ensemble and an unbiased reference ensemble, and therefore measures relative information rather than the logarithm of the number of black-hole microstates. We show perturbatively that its temperature and entropy can be reproduced by an infrared deformation of General Relativity. To linear order in the deformation couplings, the surface-gravity temperature and the Wald entropy agree with the information-theoretic results. In an explicit realization, the matching generates a positive effective cosmological term whose smallness is related to the large microscopic parameter $N$. We also propose an extension to Kerr-Newman black holes based on the irreducible mass. This construction preserves the connection with the horizon area and the semiclassical limit, while distinguishing geometrical extremality from the universal statistical-freezing endpoint, which is independent of angular momentum and charge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346. – 18 –

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking,The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161–170

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Scholarpedia3(Oct., 2008) 7375

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199–220

    1975

  5. [5]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

    arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    J. M. Maldacena, A. Strominger and E. Witten,Black hole entropy in M theory,JHEP12 (1997) 002, [hep-th/9711053]

    arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,JHEP02(1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

    A. Strominger,Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates,JHEP02(1998) 009, [hep-th/9712251]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    A String Theoretic Derivation of Gibbons-Hawking Entropy

    G. Dvali,A string theoretic derivation of gibbons-hawking entropy,Gen. Rel. Grav.57(2025) 118, [2407.01510]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Susskind and J

    L. Susskind and J. Uglum,Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2700–2711, [hep-th/9401070]

    1994 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    1995 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 742–767, [1112.3359]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Dvali, C

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. L¨ ust,Classical Limit of Black Hole Quantum N-Portrait and BMS Symmetry,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 173–177, [1509.02114]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Dvali,Area law microstate entropy from criticality and spherical symmetry,Phys

    G. Dvali,Area law microstate entropy from criticality and spherical symmetry,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 105005, [1712.02233]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Information-Theoretic Black Hole Entropy I: Beyond the Area Law

    A. Kehagias, “Information-Theoretic Black Hole Entropy I: Beyond the Area Law.” (Companion paper)

  7. [15]

    Wilks,The Third Law of Thermodynamics

    J. Wilks,The Third Law of Thermodynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1961

    1961

  8. [16]

    R. M. Wald,The ’Nernst theorem’ and black hole thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6467–6474, [gr-qc/9704008]

    1997 arXiv

  9. [17]

    R. M. Wald,The thermodynamics of black holes,Living Rev. Rel.4(2001) 6, [gr-qc/9912119]

    2001 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Israel,Third Law of Black-Hole Dynamics: A Formulation and Proof,Phys

    W. Israel,Third Law of Black-Hole Dynamics: A Formulation and Proof,Phys. Rev. Lett. 57(1986) 397

    1986

  11. [19]

    H. S. Reall,Third law of black hole mechanics for supersymmetric black holes and a quasilocal mass-charge inequality,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 124059, [2410.11956]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A. M. McSharry and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric black holes and the third law of black hole mechanics,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 104009

    2025

  13. [21]

    Kehle and R

    C. Kehle and R. Unger,Gravitational collapse to extremal black holes and the third law of black hole thermodynamics,J. Eur. Math. Soc.(2025) , [2211.15742]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. R. V. Crump, M. Gadioux, H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos,Violation of the Third Law of Black Hole Mechanics in Vacuum Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 171405, [2601.20955]. – 19 –

    2026 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler,On information and sufficiency,The Annals of Mathematical Statistics22(1951) 79–86

    1951

  16. [24]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2 ed., 2006

    2006

  17. [25]

    Visser,Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure,Phys

    M. Visser,Dirty black holes: Thermodynamics and horizon structure,Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 2445–2451, [hep-th/9203057]

    1992 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Lu and M

    M. Lu and M. B. Wise,Black holes with a generalized gravitational action,Phys. Rev. D47 (1993) R3095–R3098, [gr-qc/9301021]

    1993 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. M. Carroll, A. De Felice, V. Duvvuri, D. A. Easson, M. Trodden and M. S. Turner,The Cosmology of generalized modified gravity models,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063513, [astro-ph/0410031]

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the noether charge,Physical Review D48(1993) R3427–R3431, [gr-qc/9307038]

    1993 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Iyer and R

    V. Iyer and R. M. Wald,Some properties of noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Physical Review D50(1994) 846–864, [gr-qc/9403028]

    1994 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Christodoulou,Reversible and irreversible transformations in black hole physics,Phys

    D. Christodoulou,Reversible and irreversible transformations in black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.25(1970) 1596–1597

    1970

  23. [31]

    Christodoulou and R

    D. Christodoulou and R. Ruffini,Reversible transformations of a charged black hole,Phys. Rev. D4(1971) 3552–3555

    1971

  24. [32]

    L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci,The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,JHEP 05(2021) 145, [2003.02860]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Rakic, M

    I. Rakic, M. Rangamani and G. J. Turiaci,Thermodynamics of the near-extremal Kerr spacetime,JHEP06(2024) 011, [2310.04532]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Kapec, A

    D. Kapec, A. Sheta, A. Strominger and C. Toldo,Logarithmic Corrections to Kerr Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 021601, [2310.00848]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Dabholkar, J

    A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, S. Murthy and A. Sen,Supersymmetric index from black hole entropy,Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2011) 034, [1009.3226]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Heydeman, L

    M. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu, G. J. Turiaci and W. Zhao,The statistical mechanics of near-BPS black holes,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55(2022) 014004, [2011.01953]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Dvali and C

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Quantum Compositeness of Gravity: Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,JCAP01(2014) 023, [1312.4795]. [38]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [39]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751. – 20 –

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.