Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Large Spin-Wave Fluctuations Suppress Activity in Malthusian Flocks

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In two-dimensional Malthusian flocks, sufficiently strong noise renders the active nonlinearity irrelevant, so the large-scale dynamics is that of the equilibrium XY model, with a BKT-like RG flow separating this phase from the active…

desk verdict Serious and unusually detailed RG calculation, but the central BKT-like claim rests on a moth-diagram correction that an independent preprint directly contradicts; worth refereeing, not worth believing yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05805 v1 pith:H6RPOPS2 submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mech

Emir Sezik , Gunnar Pruessner This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords MalthusianflocksGoldstonemodesXYmodelBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransitionrenormalizationgroupactivematterspin-wavefluctuationsvision-conemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the Goldstone modes of two-dimensional Malthusian flocks, the constant-density relatives of standard flocking models, and sets out to show that their phase structure contains a phase in which activity is irrelevant on large scales. In that phase the dynamics crosses over to the equilibrium XY model, despite the underlying non-equilibrium drive. The claim is carried by a renormalization-group analysis that finds a Gaussian critical point at $\Gamma=4\pi D$, $\lambda=0$, with flows that mimic the BKT transition. If the claim holds, flocking models in this universality class can become asymptotically equilibrium at strong noise, and the phase diagram of Malthusian flocks is richer than earlier scaling-exponent discussions suggested.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Goldstone field $\theta(x,t)$ of the symmetry-broken order parameter, together with the restricted $O(2)$ symmetry that rotates spin space and real space together. That symmetry forces the equation of motion to be built from the two directional derivatives $\partial_\parallel=\cos\theta\,\partial_x+\sin\theta\,\partial_y$ and $\partial_\perp=-\sin\theta\,\partial_x+\cos\theta\,\partial_y$, producing the effective Langevin equation for the Goldstone mode. The argument then turns on enhanced dimensional analysis: because $\theta$ is compact, the free correlator gives $\langle\cos(n(\theta(x)-\theta(0)))\rangle\sim |x|^{-n^2\Gamma/(4\pi D)}$, so the activity coupling $\lambda$ inside $\{\cos\theta\,\partial_x+\sin\theta\,\partial_y\}\theta$ carries an anomalous dimension $L^{-1+\Gamma/(4\pi D)}$. The perturbative RG around the Gaussian fixed point $\Gamma=4\pi D$, $\lambda=0$ closes with the two flow functions, where the $\delta$-flow is produced by the moth diagram renormalizing the diffusion constant $D$; this is the step that makes the phase boundary nontrivial.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop correction to the diffusion constant $D$ in the same field theory: a vanishing, or sign-opposite, logarithmic divergence would remove the $\delta$-flow and with it the claimed $\Gamma=4\pi D$ boundary. A large-scale numerical simulation of the effective Langevin equation that measures the noise-to-diffusion ratio under renormalization would also distinguish the predicted threshold from the competing $\Gamma=2\pi D$ value, since only the former allows the XY phase for $\Gamma$ between $2\pi D$ and $4\pi D$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper claims that in two spatial dimensions the Malthusian-flock universality class contains a Gaussian fixed point at $\Gamma = 4\pi D$, $\lambda = 0$ that separates two phases. For $\Gamma > 4\pi D$ the advective nonlinearity $\lambda$ in the Goldstone-mode equation is irrelevant under the renormalization group, so the large-scale fluctuations are those of the equilibrium XY model; for $\Gamma < 4\pi D$ the nonlinearity grows and the system belongs to a genuinely non-equilibrium Malthusian phase. The mechanism is the anomalous scaling of the trigonometric factors $\cos\theta$ and $\sin\theta$, which changes the effective dimension of $\lambda$ from $L^{-1}$ to $L^{-1+\Gamma/(4\pi D)}$. Close to the critical point the leading-order RG flows are $\mu\,d\lambda_R/d\mu = \delta_R\lambda_R$ and $\mu\,d\delta_R/d\mu = (\alpha/4)\lambda_R^2$ with $\alpha=0.62433\ldots$, the same structure as the BKT transition, and the spin-correlation function at the critical point scales as $|x|^{-2}\ln^{-2}|x|$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the one-loop moth diagram truly renormalizes the diffusion constant $D$, giving the flow $\mu\,d\delta_R/d\mu=(\alpha/4)\lambda_R^2$; the paper itself notes that an independent calculation finds no such diverging correction, which would leave the phase boundary set by bare power counting alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For bare noise strength $\Gamma>4\pi D$, the activity coupling flows to zero and the two-dimensional Malthusian flock is asymptotically described by the equilibrium XY model, including its Gaussian spin correlations on large scales.
  • For $\Gamma<4\pi D$, the activity coupling grows and the system leaves the perturbative regime, entering the Malthusian phase in which the non-equilibrium nonlinearity must be retained.
  • The critical point at $\Gamma=4\pi D$, $\lambda=0$ is half-stable and reachable only along the separatrix $\delta=\sqrt{\alpha}\,|\lambda|/2$; initial conditions above the separatrix with $\delta>0$ eventually flow into the Malthusian phase despite an initially irrelevant-looking $\lambda$.
  • At the critical point, the spin-correlation function decays as $|x|^{-2}\ln^{-2}|x|$, so the anomalous and dynamical exponents carry logarithmic corrections rather than pure power-law values.
  • Because the transition arises from the interaction of activity with spin waves, not from vortex unbinding, it is a distinct nonequilibrium transition even though its RG flow has BKT form.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the one-loop flow is correct, the positive $\beta_\delta$ means diffusion grows as the RG runs, so the dimensionless noise $\Gamma/D$ shrinks; this positive feedback is what makes the XY line stable and suggests the XY phase is a line of Gaussian fixed points with continuously varying exponents.
  • The unresolved disagreement with a competing calculation could be settled by a direct order-by-order check of the moth diagram; if the competing result survives, the phase boundary reverts to the naive $L^{-1}$ scaling of $\lambda$, and no noise-tuned XY phase exists.
  • Vortices, which the paper deliberately excludes, cut correlations more strongly than spin waves; including them should shift the effective threshold downward and may shrink the XY phase region, so the present result is best read as the vortex-free slice of a larger phase diagram.
  • The BKT-like flow suggests an approximate duality: the ratio $\Gamma/(4\pi D)$ plays the role of inverse temperature and $\lambda$ the role of vortex fugacity; if so, observables such as the spin stiffness should show universal jump-like signatures at the critical point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the two-dimensional Goldstone-mode dynamics of Malthusian flocks / vision-cone spin systems. Starting from the restricted O(2) symmetry of the order parameter, the authors derive an effective Langevin equation for the phase field θ, Eq. (8), with a single active nonlinearity λ and noise Γ. Using a free-field 'enhanced' dimensional analysis, Eq. (7), they identify a Gaussian fixed point at Γ=4πD, λ=0, and perform a perturbative RG around it. The leading-order flow equations, Eqs. (11), are BKT-like, with βδ=(α/4)λ_R² generated by the moth diagrams in the SM. The paper claims a high-temperature 'XY phase' where activity is irrelevant, a 'Malthusian phase' where it grows, and a critical point with spin correlation scaling |x|^{-2} ln^{-2}|x|, Eq. (13).

Significance. The claimed phase structure, if correct, would add a previously unnoticed equilibrium-XY-like phase to Malthusian flocks and vision-cone models, and would identify a spin-wave-driven transition distinct from the vortex-driven BKT transition. The paper is careful in deriving the symmetry-consistent equation of motion, and the supplemental material contains explicit propagators, vertex rules, and a parameter-free evaluation of the constant α in the flow equations. These are strengths. However, the central result hinges entirely on a single diagrammatic contribution, the moth-diagram renormalization of D, and the manuscript itself reports that a contemporaneous work finds the opposite result. That unresolved contradiction makes the main conclusion conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Note added; SM §III.B, Eq. (78)] The flow equation βδ=(α/4)λ_R², Eqs. (11b) and (82b), is the load-bearing result: without it, δ does not flow, the BKT-like separatrix disappears, and the logarithmic correction in Eq. (13) has no basis. The paper's Note added states that Grosvenor and Patil [48], studying the same model, find that D receives no diverging diagrammatic correction and that activity becomes relevant for Γ<2πD. These are mutually exclusive predictions for the same quantity, and the manuscript does not resolve the contradiction. The authors must either identify a specific error in their moth-diagram computation (SM Eqs. (64)-(78)), show a subtle difference in the model or renormalization scheme that would explain the 4πD vs 2πD boundary, or otherwise provide a test that distinguishes the two calculations. As it stands, the central claim of the paper is not internally settled.
  2. [SM §III.B, Eqs. (64)-(78)] The moth-diagram evaluation appears to rely on several approximations whose validity is not fully demonstrated: the replacement of cosh(C0)-1 and sinh(C0) by (1/2)e^{C0} in Eq. (66), the restriction to the UV-divergent part, and the extraction of the k² term at Eq. (68). Since the entire phase boundary and the critical correlation function depend on Eq. (78), each of these steps needs to be checked against the calculation of Ref. [48]. The authors should provide a step-by-step comparison of the divergent part with the corresponding calculation in [48], or at least identify the precise point where the two calculations diverge.
  3. [Main text, after Eq. (7); Conclusions] The identification of the Gaussian fixed point at Γ=4πD uses the free-field scaling cosθ ~ |x|^{-Γ/(4πD)}. This is then used as the relevance criterion, and the RG flow βλ=δλ is essentially built in by construction. The factor-of-two discrepancy with the 2πD threshold in [48] indicates that the result is sensitive to the definition of the correlator or the regularization scheme. The manuscript should state explicitly what measurable physical quantity fixes the numerical coefficient of the threshold, so that the discrepancy is not a matter of convention.
  4. [Conclusions; SM §I] The paper restricts to the vortex-free sector, as acknowledged (θ differentiable everywhere). The statement 'vortices have the same effect on activity as spin waves as captured in Eq. (7)' is an extrapolation without a calculation. Since the full XY model necessarily includes vortices, the claimed separation of phases and the universal scaling at the critical point are properties of a slice of the model space. The paper should either prove or clearly label as a conjecture that vortex-free results persist in the full model, and should adjust the abstract/conclusions accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (13)] The scaling function in Eq. (13) is written as Ĉ(t/|x|² exp(1/ln|x|)), but the argument t/|x|² has dimensions that depend on D. Rescaling t by D or defining a dimensionless time variable would improve clarity.
  2. [Main text, Eq. (11); SM Eq. (82)] The text says 'leading order' but the expansion is in both λ and δ. It would help to specify the counting: what is the order of the neglected terms, and why terms such as λ δ are subleading.
  3. [Main text, Eq. (10)] The definition δ = Γ/(4πD) - 1 is introduced without a reference to the SM. A cross-reference to SM §III.B would help the reader.
  4. [SM Eq. (72)] The use of the upper incomplete Gamma function is not defined before Eq. (73); it is defined after, which is slightly confusing.
  5. [Main text, Eq. (9)] The fixed point is called 'Gaussian' and 'half-stable'. The paper should mention that the stability is 'half-stable' because one direction flows in and the other out, but this is only established for the vortex-free approximation.
  6. [References] Reference [40] is listed as 'to be published', and the manuscript relies on it for the complementary non-perturbative RG. If possible, a version of that paper should be made available for the referee process, as its results are used to support the claim that the RG flow structure is confirmed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nontrivial beta_delta flow is an independent one-loop computation, while the delta-based relevance criterion is explicitly presented as dimensional analysis input rather than as a prediction derived from itself.

full rationale

The paper's central result is the RG flow pair in Eq. (11), especially beta_delta = (alpha/4) lambda_R^2, which is obtained by an explicit perturbative calculation of the UV-divergent moth-diagram contribution to the diffusion constant (SM Sec. III.B, Eqs. (64)-(78)). The constant alpha is evaluated as a definite integral, not fitted to data or to the target phase structure, so the flow is not statistically forced. The parameter delta is defined as Gamma/(4 pi D) - 1, which encodes the free-field spin-wave scaling of cos(theta) derived in Eq. (7); the leading-order flow beta_lambda = delta_R lambda_R is therefore a restatement of the enhanced dimensional analysis. However, the paper does not present this as an independent prediction: it explicitly labels the dimensional analysis as the way the critical point and relevance criterion are identified, and the genuinely load-bearing new content is the computed renormalization of delta. The self-references are to the authors' own supplemental material, which contains the derivation, and to an unpublished companion paper [40] that is cited for corroboration and for complementary non-perturbative results, not as the justification of the perturbative RG calculation. The Note added reports a direct disagreement with Grosvenor and Patil [48] over whether D receives a diverging correction; if [48] is correct, Eq. (11b) would vanish and the BKT-like flows would not follow. That is a substantive correctness dispute about the value of a diagram, not a circularity. No parameter is fitted, no defined quantity is silently equated with the quantity it is supposed to predict, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. Accordingly the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper pins its results to a posited symmetry-based equation of motion for the Goldstone mode, the vortex-free assumption, the free-field scaling of trigonometric operators, and the completeness of the leading-order diagrammatic resummation. No parameters are fitted to data: D, Γ, and λ are model inputs, and the constant α=0.62433 is computed from a convergent integral. The quantitative phase boundary depends on the moth-diagram correction to D, which is the exact step disputed by Ref. [48].

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dynamics of the Goldstone mode is posited from symmetry (Eq. (8)/(28)) rather than derived from the full field theory.
    Main text: 'we posit the equation of motion for the gapless mode, θ(x,t), based on symmetry considerations', because the direct approach 'might yield an equation with some relevant terms missing in two dimensions' (Ref. [41]/SM §I). All subsequent RG results inherit this starting point.
  • domain assumption The system is analysed in the vortex-free (spin-wave-only) sector.
    Main text after Eq. (7): 'we will assume θ(x,t) to be differentiable everywhere, thereby focusing solely on spin waves.' The paper acknowledges vortices would add a fugacity axis to the phase diagram; the claimed XY/Malthusian phase diagram is explicitly the vortex-free slice.
  • standard math Trigonometric composite operators scale according to the free-field logarithmic correlator Eq. (7)/(39).
    The scaling e^{±inθ} ~ r^{-n²Γ/(4πD)} is computed from the Gaussian (Edwards-Wilkinson) theory with K0 correlator; this is a standard operator-scaling result in Sine-Gordon/BKT literature (Zinn-Justin [43], Amit-Goldschmidt-Grinstein [44]). The paper relies on it to assign the effective dimension L^{-1+Γ/(4πD)} to λ.
  • domain assumption The leading-order diagrammatic RG resummation is complete and the theory is renormalisable near the Gaussian fixed point.
    SM §III.B assumes renormalisability and sums daisy, sail, and moth diagrams to all orders in the daisy petals, discarding other classes; the resulting β_δ=(α/4)λ² is the sole new input that moves the phase boundary beyond dimensional analysis. This is the step directly contested by Ref. [48].
  • domain assumption The mass regulator m² softly breaks the symmetry but does not affect flow functions or their roots.
    SM §II: 'adding the mass constitutes only a soft breaking of symmetry which disappears at the critical point... neither the flow functions and nor their roots depend on m.' The analysis relies on taking m→0 after extracting UV divergences.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Spin-Wave Fluctuations Suppress Activity in Malthusian Flocks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H6RPOPS2

@misc{pith2026260805805,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Spin-Wave Fluctuations Suppress Activity in Malthusian Flocks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H6RPOPS2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05805}
}
read the original abstract

Novel phases, beyond long-range order in two dimensions, have continued to be discovered within flocking models, establishing flocking as one of the pivotal paradigms in active matter. However, much of the discussion around ``Malthusian'' (constant density) flocks, an analytically more tractable alternative to the Vicsek model, has centred around the scaling exponents governing the intermediate regime prior to the proliferation of asters, leaving open the question of what other phases the model might display. Here, we study the two-dimensional dynamics of Malthusian flocks and identify a previously unnoticed phase, where the dynamics is that of the equilibrium XY Model. By identifying the symmetries of the model, we derive the effective equations of motion for the Goldstone modes and analyse the spin-wave fluctuations. We identify a novel critical point separating two distinct phases and, using a perturbative RG procedure, determine the RG flows in its vicinity. This allows us to calculate the universal scaling behaviour at the critical point, along with its logarithmic corrections. The novel phase transition here is due to the interaction of activity and spin-waves, unlike the equilibrium counterpart, which undergoes a phase transition in effective degrees of freedom, namely vortices. Nevertheless, the RG flows are similar to those of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, and we show that for sufficiently strong noise, the activity becomes irrelevant and the system crosses over to the equilibrium XY universality class.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05805 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. RG flows Eq. (11) as µ ↓ 0 of the model near the Gaussian critical point λR = 0 = δR. The Malthusian and XY phases are indicated by purple and green, respectively. These phases are separated by a half-stable Gaussian fixed point, that is accessible only from δR > 0 along the separatrix √ α|λR|/2 = |δR|. The XY phase, λR = 0, is stable at large noise strengths Γ and small nonlinearity λ. aratrix of the two phases sta… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [40]

    Jentsch and A

    P. Jentsch and A. Erzberger, to be published

    work page

  2. [48]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of con- densed matter physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [1]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnet- ism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1133 (1966)

    work page 1966

  4. [2]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  5. [3]

    Tasaki, Hohenberg-mermin-wagner-type theorems for equilibrium models of flocking, Phys

    H. Tasaki, Hohenberg-mermin-wagner-type theorems for equilibrium models of flocking, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 220601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [4]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  7. [5]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Long-Range Order in a Two- Dimensional Dynamical XY Model: How Birds Fly To- gether, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4326 (1995)

    work page 1995

  8. [6]

    Mahault, F

    B. Mahault, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Quantitative As- sessment of the Toner and Tu Theory of Polar Flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 218001 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 73 references
  1. [7]

    Miller and J

    M. Miller and J. Toner, Following your nose: Autochemo- taxis and other mechanisms for spinodal decomposition in flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 128301 (2024)

    2024

  2. [8]

    Miller and J

    M. Miller and J. Toner, Spinodal decomposition and phase separation in polar active matter, Phys. Rev. E 109, 034606 (2024)

    2024

  3. [9]

    Miller and J

    M. Miller and J. Toner, Phase separation in ordered po- lar active fluids: A completely different universality class from that of equilibrium fluids, Phys. Rev. E110, 054607 (2024)

    2024

  4. [10]

    Codina, B

    J. Codina, B. Mahault, H. Chat´ e, J. Dobnikar, I. Pagonabarraga, and X.-q. Shi, Small obstacle in a large polar flock, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 218001 (2022)

    2022

  5. [11]

    Granek, H

    O. Granek, H. Chat´ e, Y. Kafri, S. Ro, A. Solon, and J. Tailleur, How continuous symmetry stabilizes the ordered phase of polar flocks (2026), arXiv:2602.16865 [cond-mat]

    2026

  6. [12]

    Benvegnen, O

    B. Benvegnen, O. Granek, S. Ro, R. Yaacoby, H. Chat´ e, Y. Kafri, D. Mukamel, A. Solon, and J. Tailleur, Metasta- bility of discrete-symmetry flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 218301 (2023)

    2023

  7. [13]

    Lardet, R

    E. Lardet, R. Voituriez, S. Grigolon, and T. Bertrand, Disordered yet directed: The emergence of polar flocks with disordered interactions (2024), arXiv:2409.10768 [cond-mat.soft]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Lardet, L

    E. Lardet, L. Chen, and T. Bertrand, Flocking beyond one species: Novel phase coexistence in a generalized two- species vicsek model, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2026)

    2026

  9. [15]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Flocks, herds, and schools: A quant- itative theory of flocking, Phys. Rev. E58, 4828 (1998). 6

    1998

  10. [16]

    Toner, Reanalysis of the hydrodynamic theory of fluid, polar-ordered flocks, Phys

    J. Toner, Reanalysis of the hydrodynamic theory of fluid, polar-ordered flocks, Phys. Rev. E86, 031918 (2012)

    2012

  11. [18]

    Chat´ e and A

    H. Chat´ e and A. Solon, Dynamic Scaling of Two- Dimensional Polar Flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 268302 (2024)

    2024

  12. [19]

    L. Chen, P. Jentsch, C. F. Lee, A. Maitra, S. Ramaswamy, and J. Toner, The inconvenient truth about flocks (2025), arXiv:2503.17064 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, New universality class describes vicsek’s flocking phase in physical dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 128301 (2024)

    2024

  14. [21]

    Toner, Birth, Death, and Flight: A Theory of Malthu- sian Flocks, Phys

    J. Toner, Birth, Death, and Flight: A Theory of Malthu- sian Flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 088102 (2012)

    2012

  15. [22]

    L. Chen, C. F. Lee, and J. Toner, A novel nonequilibrium state of matter: ad= 4−ϵexpansion study of Malthusian flocks, Phys. Rev. E102, 022610 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    L. Chen, C. F. Lee, and J. Toner, Moving, Reproducing, and Dying Beyond Flatland: Malthusian Flocks in Di- mensions d>2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 098003 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    Di Carlo and M

    L. Di Carlo and M. Scandolo, Evidence of fluctuation- induced first-order phase transition in active matter, New J. Phys.24, 123032 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Toner, Birth, death, and horizontal flight: Malthusian flocks with an easy plane in three dimensions, Phys

    J. Toner, Birth, death, and horizontal flight: Malthusian flocks with an easy plane in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E110, 064604 (2024)

    2024

  19. [26]

    Besse, H

    M. Besse, H. Chat´ e, and A. Solon, Metastability of constant-density flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 268003 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Rouzaire, D

    Y. Rouzaire, D. J. G. Pearce, I. Pagonabarraga, and D. Levis, Nonreciprocal interactions reshape topological defect annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 167101 (2025)

    2025

  21. [28]

    S. A. M. Loos, S. H. L. Klapp, and T. Martynec, Long- range order and directional defect propagation in the nonreciprocalXYmodel with vision cone interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 198301 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    L. P. Dadhichi, J. Kethapelli, R. Chajwa, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Maitra, Nonmutual torques and the unimportance of motility for long-range order in two-dimensional flocks, Phys. Rev. E101, 052601 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Dopierala, H

    D. Dopierala, H. Chat´ e, X.-q. Shi, and A. Solon, Inescap- able anisotropy of nonreciprocal XY models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 088302 (2025)

    2025

  24. [31]

    Popli, A

    P. Popli, A. Maitra, and S. Ramaswamy, Ordering and defect cloaking in nonreciprocal lattice XY models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 088303 (2025)

    2025

  25. [32]

    Rouzaire, D

    Y. Rouzaire, D. J. Pearce, I. Pagonabarraga, and D. Levis, Dynamics ofO(2) excitations in a non- reciprocal medium, arXiv:2603.23225 [cond-mat.stat- mech] (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, Diversity of critical phenom- ena in the ordered phase of polar active fluids (2025), arXiv:2512.18846 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025

  27. [35]

    A. P. Solon, H. Chat´ e, and J. Tailleur, From phase to microphase separation in flocking models: The essential role of nonequilibrium fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 068101 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Bertin, M

    E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Gr´ egoire, Boltzmann and hy- drodynamic description for self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. E74, 022101 (2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Gr´ egoire and H

    G. Gr´ egoire and H. Chat´ e, Onset of collective and cohes- ive motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 025702 (2004)

    2004

  30. [38]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  31. [39]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one- dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a con- tinuous symmetry group I. classical systems, Sov. Phys. JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  32. [41]

    See Supplemental Material [url] for technical details, which includes Refs. [?]

  33. [42]

    XY phase

    in the IR ask→0. However, the trigonometric func- tion multiplying it, suppresses the drift term on the large scale and thus introduces an additional scale-dependence that undermines this argument [43, 44]. There is little scope expanding these functions, asθis dimensionless. ...

  34. [44]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena, 4th ed

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002)

    2002

  35. [45]

    D. J. Amit, Y. Y. Goldschmidt, and S. Grinstein, Renor- malisation group analysis of the phase transition in the 2D Coulomb gas, Sine-Gordon theory and XY-model, J. Phys. A13, 585 (1980)

    1980

  36. [46]

    Le Bellac,Quantum and Statistical Field Theory(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 1991) translated by G

    M. Le Bellac,Quantum and Statistical Field Theory(Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, 1991) translated by G. Barton

    1991

  37. [49]

    Large Spin-Wave Fluctuations Suppress Activity in Malthusian Flocks

    K. T. Grosvenor and S. P. Patil, On the renormaliza- tion group flow of active flocks (2026), arXiv:2606.20552 [cond-mat.soft]. Supplemental Material for “Large Spin-Wave Fluctuations Suppress Activity in Malthusian Flocks” Emir Sezik 1,∗ and Gunnar Pruessner 1,† 1Department o...

    2026 arXiv

  38. [50]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  39. [51]

    Toner,The Physics of Flocking: Birth, Death, and Flight in Active Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    J. Toner,The Physics of Flocking: Birth, Death, and Flight in Active Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    2024

  40. [52]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking, Phys. Rev. E58, 4828 (1998)

    1998

  41. [53]

    Toner, Y

    J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Ann. Phys.318, 170 (2005)

    2005

  42. [54]

    L. Chen, C. F. Lee, and J. Toner, Moving, Reproducing, and Dying Beyond Flatland: Malthusian Flocks in Dimensions d >2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 098003 (2020)

    2020

  43. [55]

    Chat´ e and A

    H. Chat´ e and A. Solon, Dynamic Scaling of Two-Dimensional Polar Flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 268302 (2024)

    2024

  44. [56]

    Grinstein, Generic scale invariance and self-organized criticality, inScale Invariance, Interfaces, and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics, edited by A

    G. Grinstein, Generic scale invariance and self-organized criticality, inScale Invariance, Interfaces, and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics, edited by A. McKane, M. Droz, J. Vannimenus, and D. Wolf (Plenum Press, New York, 1995) pp. 261–293, proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Inst...

    1995

  45. [57]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 889 (1986). 17

    1986

  46. [58]

    Dopierala, H

    D. Dopierala, H. Chat´ e, X.-q. Shi, and A. Solon, Inescapable anisotropy of nonreciprocal XY models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 088302 (2025)

    2025

  47. [59]

    Meakin,Fractals, Scaling and Growth Far from Equilibrium, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    P. Meakin,Fractals, Scaling and Growth Far from Equilibrium, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    1998

  48. [60]

    Pimpinelli and J

    A. Pimpinelli and J. Villain,Physics of Crystal Growth, Collection Al´ ea-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    1998

  49. [61]

    Vicsek,Fractal Growth Phenomena, 1st ed

    T. Vicsek,Fractal Growth Phenomena, 1st ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989)

    1989

  50. [62]

    Barab´ asi and H

    A.-L. Barab´ asi and H. E. Stanley,Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  51. [63]

    Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z. Phys. B23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  52. [64]

    Bausch, H

    R. Bausch, H. K. Janssen, and H. Wagner, Renormalized field theory of critical dynamics, Z. Phys. B24, 113 (1976)

    1976

  53. [65]

    Janssen, Renormalized field theory of the critical dynamics ofO(n)-symmetric systems, Z

    H.-K. Janssen, Renormalized field theory of the critical dynamics ofO(n)-symmetric systems, Z. Phys. B26, 187 (1977)

    1977

  54. [66]

    H. K. Janssen, On the renormalized field theory of nonlinear critical relaxation, inFrom Phase Transitions to Chaos(1992) pp. 68–91

    1992

  55. [67]

    U. C. T¨ auber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    2014

  56. [68]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  57. [69]

    C. D. Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques, J. Phys. Colloq.37(1976)

    1976

  58. [70]

    D. J. Amit, Y. Y. Goldschmidt, and S. Grinstein, Renormalisation group analysis of the phase transition in the 2D Coulomb gas, Sine-Gordon theory and XY-model, J. Phys. A13, 585 (1980)

    1980

  59. [71]

    Le Bellac,Quantum and Statistical Field Theory(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991) translated by G

    M. Le Bellac,Quantum and Statistical Field Theory(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991) translated by G. Barton

    1991

  60. [72]

    Pruessner, Drift causes anomalous exponents in growth processes, Phys

    G. Pruessner, Drift causes anomalous exponents in growth processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 246101 (2004)

    2004

  61. [73]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., edited by D. Zwillinger and V. H. Moll (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2014)

    2014

  62. [74]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 4th ed

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2002)

    2002

  63. [75]

    D. J. Amit and V. Mart ´ ın-Mayor,Field Theory, the Renormalization Group, and Critical Phenomena, 3rd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

    2005

  64. [76]

    Neudecker, Nonlinear crystal growth near the roughening-transition, Z

    B. Neudecker, Nonlinear crystal growth near the roughening-transition, Z. Phys. B49, 57 (1982)

    1982

  65. [77]

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica (2026), version 13.2.1.0

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.