Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 82 references

True and Quasi Long-Range Order in Malthusian Flocks

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A rotationally invariant, defect-free renormalization group calculation fixes the scaling exponents of two-dimensional Malthusian flocks at 1/4 and 3/4 and finds a quasi-long-range-ordered phase with a critical endpoint distinct from BKT.

desk verdict Solid NPRG calculation that reproduces Chate-Solon exponents, but the QLRO phase is derived for a defect-free spin-wave model, not the physical Malthusian flock. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05851 v1 pith:IDCU5QKG submitted 2026-08-06 cond-mat.soft

Patrick Jentsch , Anna Erzberger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords Malthusianflocksactivematternonperturbativerenormalizationgroupquasi-long-rangeorderBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransitionflockingspin-waveapproximationuniversalityclass
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Flocks whose constituents are continually created and destroyed—cells in a tissue, filaments in a cytoskeleton—are described by Malthusian flock hydrodynamics, but their two-dimensional phase diagram has resisted analytic treatment because nonlinearities cannot be handled perturbatively. This paper claims that a nonperturbative renormalization group calculation, rotationally invariant to second order in derivatives and excluding topological defects, resolves the problem. It explicitly finds the strong-coupling fixed point of the ordered phase with exponents $\eta_x=1/4$ and $\eta_y=3/4$ (hence $\chi=-1/4$, $\zeta=3/4$, $z=5/4$), recovering the prediction of Ref. [28] without invoking extra symmetries. It also uncovers an attractive line of fixed points that realizes quasi-long-range order in the spin-wave model, ending in a critical point similar to, but distinct from, the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition. If correct, the universal scaling of ordered flocks with turnover is known, and the route into collective motion is controlled by self-advection alone.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stochastic equation of motion for the orientation angle $\theta$ obtained under the spin-wave approximation, Eq. (1): a single field theory with five parameters—self-advection $\lambda$, isotropic and anisotropic diffusion $\mu_1,\mu_2,\mu_3$, and noise amplitude $D$—whose form is completely fixed by rotational and chiral symmetry at second order in derivatives. The paper converts this Langevin equation into a response-field action and applies the exact nonperturbative renormalization group flow, truncating the effective average action to the same second-order derivative expansion. A mass-like regulator makes the loop integrals analytic, and a sharp cutoff confirms that the fixed-point structure and exponents do not depend on the regulator. The dimensionless couplings $\bar\lambda,\bar\mu_x,\bar\mu_y,\bar\mu_3$ then flow according to four coupled equations whose fixed points encode the universal physics.

What would settle it

A direct numerical test: simulate the spin-wave model (1) on a lattice and measure the equal-time orientation correlation function; the paper predicts algebraic decay with exponent $2\bar\mu_x^*$ that reaches 2 at the critical point, whereas exponential decay or a universal BKT exponent of 1/4 at unbinding would refute the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the second-order, rotationally invariant derivative expansion of the effective action for the Goldstone mode of a two-dimensional Malthusian flock has three fixed-point structures. The stable strong-coupling Malthusian fixed point sits at $\bar\lambda^*=\sqrt{8/5}$, $\bar\mu_y^*=-\bar\mu_3^*=1/5$, $\bar\mu_x^*=0$ and carries anomalous dimensions $\eta_x=1/4$, $\eta_y=3/4$, which translate into $\chi=-1/4$, $\zeta=3/4$, $z=5/4$; because the graphical correction to the self-advection $\lambda$ vanishes at this fixed point, the exponents follow from rotational symmetry alone rather than an additional symmetry assumption. The paper also finds Toner's fixed point and, unexpectedly, an attractive line $\bar\lambda^*=0$, $\bar\mu_x^*=\bar\mu_y^*=1$, $\bar\mu_3^*=0$ that realizes quasi-long-range order, with a critical endpoint at $\bar\mu_x^*=1$ whose universal exponent differs from the BKT value $1/8$. The authors state plainly that the quasi-long-range-order part of the analysis depends on the spin-wave approximation and that defect fluctuations are not treated.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the spin-wave approximation: the polarity amplitude is frozen, so the angle field is smooth and topological defects cannot form; if defect pairs unbind in the full model, the quasi-long-range-ordered phase may not exist and the ordered-phase exponents could also shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the long-distance scaling of ordered Malthusian flocks in two dimensions is universal, with exponents $\eta_x=1/4$, $\eta_y=3/4$ and derived exponents $\zeta=3/4$, $z=5/4$.
  • In the spin-wave model without defects, quasi-long-range order exists and orientation correlations decay as a power law whose exponent is set by where the flow lands on the attractive line of fixed points.
  • The transition from quasi-long-range order to true long-range order is driven by the self-advection $\lambda$ alone, so increasing motility can turn a globally disordered but responsive state into a collectively migrating one.
  • The critical endpoint is a new universality class: it resembles BKT in having a line of fixed points and a universal endpoint exponent, but the endpoint sits at $\bar\mu_x^*=1$, not the BKT value $1/8$.
  • Because the derivation uses only symmetries and conservation laws, the results should apply to any polar active system maintained at density homeostasis, including tissues and cytoskeletal networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the continuous line of fixed points implies a continuously varying quasi-long-range-order exponent; measuring the orientation correlation exponent as a function of noise or diffusion in a lattice simulation would provide a parameter-free check.
  • Editorial inference: because the critical point is controlled by $\lambda$, biological collectives could switch from a weakly ordered responsive state to true collective migration by increasing cell motility rather than alignment strength, a functional consequence the authors mention but do not develop.
  • Editorial inference: if nonequilibrium effects modify defect binding, as reported for some active liquid crystals, the quasi-long-range-ordered phase could survive in real Malthusian flocks; the paper leaves this genuinely open, so a simulation with amplitude fluctuations would settle it.
  • Editorial inference: in the equilibrium limit the attractive line coincides with the XY spin-wave line and is unstable to defects; the paper's own comparison therefore suggests that purely equilibrium systems would melt the QLRO, while actively driven systems may stabilize it or replace it with a different non-BKT melting line.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a nonperturbative renormalization group (NPRG) analysis of two-dimensional Malthusian flocks in the spin-wave approximation, in which the polarity amplitude is held fixed and topological defects are excluded. Using a second-order derivative expansion that respects rotational and chiral symmetry, the authors derive flow equations and identify a strong-coupling fixed point with exponents eta_x = 1/4, eta_y = 3/4, yielding chi = -1/4, zeta = 3/4, and z = 5/4, in agreement with the values predicted by Chate and Solon. They also report an attractive line of fixed points that would realize quasi long-range order for large noise or weak diffusion, ending at a critical point with bar_mu_x = 1 that they argue is distinct from the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless universality class. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the quasi-long-range-order analysis relies crucially on the spin-wave approximation and that defect fluctuations are expected to destabilize this phase in the full Malthusian flock model.

Significance. If the strong-coupling fixed point is robust, the paper makes an important contribution by providing a nonperturbative derivation of the Malthusian flock exponents and by demonstrating that rotational invariance alone can reproduce the Chate-Solon scaling, contrary to earlier suggestions that additional symmetries are needed. The work is accompanied by detailed supplemental calculations and Mathematica notebooks, and the authors check two different regulators, which strengthens confidence in the internal consistency of the flow calculation. The quasi-long-range-order line is an interesting prediction for the defect-free spin-wave model and is independently reported by Sezik and Pruessner (Ref. [43]). However, the physical relevance of the quasi-long-range-order phase to actual Malthusian flocks remains conditional on defect physics that is not treated in the manuscript; the authors are candid about this limitation in the body of the paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Eq. (14)] Equation (14) is incorrect as written. For a Gaussian field theta, exp(-1/2 <[theta(0,r)-theta(0,0)]^2>) equals the order-parameter correlation <n(0,r) . n(0,0)>, not the mean-square difference <[n(0,r)-n(0,0)]^2>. The latter is 2 - 2<n(0,r) . n(0,0)> and tends to 2 at large r. Thus the power law (Lambda r)^(-2 bar_mu_x) should be assigned to the correlation function, not to the squared difference. The subsequent discussion of the critical end point at bar_mu_x = 1 (corresponding to an order-parameter correlation exponent of 2) should be stated consistently with this corrected identification.
  2. [Quasi long-range order and novel critical point / Discussion & Outlook] The title and abstract present quasi long-range order as a phase of Malthusian flocks, but the calculation is performed for the spin-wave model with delta p = 0 (Supplement Eq. (4)), and the text states that the QLRO analysis 'crucially hinges' on this approximation. Moreover, in the same section the authors use the equilibrium BKT mapping to conclude that 'QLRO is generically destabilized in Malthusian flocks, either by activity or defect fluctuations.' The manuscript should therefore explicitly frame the QLRO phase as a property of the defect-free spin-wave model, and adjust the title or abstract so that the conditional nature of this claim is not lost.
  3. [Supplement: Flow equations with sharp regulator] The claim that the sharp cutoff leaves 'the quantitative values of the scaling exponents' unchanged is not supported by the numbers reported. The sharp-regulator fixed point is given as lambda* approx 0.95, mu_x* = 0, mu_y* approx 0.03, mu_3* approx 0.05. Substituting these values into Eqs. (80)-(81) gives eta_x approx 0.233 and eta_y approx 0.737, which differ by about 7% from the smooth-regulator values 1/4 and 3/4. The authors should report the sharp-regulator exponents explicitly and discuss the size of the regulator dependence, or soften the claim of quantitative agreement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (12)] The notation 'mu3x mu y' should be written as mu_x^3 mu_y to avoid ambiguity between the cube of mu_x and a coupling mu_3.
  2. [Supplement Eq. (79)] In the sharp-regulator flow equation for bar_mu_3, the first term on the right-hand side should read (1/2)(-3 eta_x - eta_y) bar_mu_3 rather than bar_mu_y.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'ressembling' should be 'resembling', 'destablized' should be 'destabilized', 'obtaines' should be 'obtains', and 'relavant' should be 'relevant'.
  4. [Main text, Eqs. (8)-(11)] The flow equations in the main text depend on eta_x and eta_y, but the explicit expressions for these anomalous dimensions appear only in the Supplement; including them in an appendix or in the main text would make the fixed-point solution more self-contained.
  5. [Discussion & Outlook] The sentence 'the nonlinear response of such a state is then governed by the scaling exponents obtained in this work' is stronger than what has been computed; response functions have not been calculated here, so this statement should be softened.
  6. [References] Ref. [43] is listed as 'to be published'; if an arXiv number or a published reference is available, it should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NPRG flow is a parameter-free calculation externally benchmarked against Chate-Solon and independently confirmed by Sezik-Pruessner; self-citations are non-load-bearing and the defect caveat is an acknowledged limitation, not a circular step.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain. The input is the spin-wave equation of motion, Eq. (1), obtained by fixing the polarity amplitude, δp = 0, in the general polar EOM (Supplemental Eq. (4)); the renormalization group then starts from the MSRDJ action (6), the exact Wetterich equation (5), an explicit second-order derivative expansion ansatz (Supplemental Eq. (19)), and two independent regulators (mass-like and sharp). The flow equations (8)-(11) are projected from the exact RG equation, with no target exponents inserted. The Malthusian fixed point is found analytically (λ* = √(8/5), µ̄y* = -µ̄3* = 1/5, µ̄x* = 0), and the exponents ηx = 1/4, ηy = 3/4 follow from the fixed-point anomalous dimensions; they are then compared with the external Chate-Solon result [28] and the independent work [43]. The attractive line of fixed points is likewise a property of the spin-wave model, and the paper explicitly states that the QLRO analysis 'crucially hinges' on the spin-wave approximation and that defect fluctuations are not captured; this is an acknowledged physical limitation, not a circular reduction, because the model is defined before the RG and no output is folded back into the input. Self-citations (Refs [22, 29, 38, 39, 67]) support symmetry and relevance arguments that are either standard or rederived in the supplement; none of them supplies the numerical predictions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors’ prior work. The only load-bearing assumption, the spin-wave approximation, is stated as a caveat rather than disguised as a result, so the derivation is self-contained with respect to its own claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities. The only free parameter is the nonuniversal QLRO fixed-point coordinate, which labels the Gaussian line. The main assumptions are the spin-wave approximation, the derivative-expansion truncation, the symmetry-completeness of Eq. (1), and non-renormalization of noise. These are reasonable within the NPRG program but are not externally validated.

free parameters (1)
  • QLRO fixed-point coordinate bar_mu_x^* = nonuniversal, 0 < bar_mu_x^* < 1 on the QLRO line; critical endpoint at bar_mu_x^* = 1
    The QLRO scaling exponent in Eq. (14) is 2 bar_mu_x^*, set by the microscopic ratio D/(4 pi gamma mu1) via Eq. (13). The theory predicts the line and its endpoint but not the position on the line; this is a free nonuniversal parameter, not a fitted constant.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Spin-wave approximation: polarity amplitude fluctuations are frozen (delta p = 0), so no topological defects.
    It is the premise of Eq. (1) and of the QLRO discussion; the paper says the analysis 'crucially hinges' on it and defects would likely destroy QLRO.
  • ad hoc to paper Gamma_k is truncated to the same form as the microscopic action S: second order in derivatives, noise at zeroth order, with scale-dependent couplings.
    This is the NPRG ansatz (Supplemental Eq. (19)); regulator dependence is checked but derivative-order convergence is not proven.
  • domain assumption Eq. (1) is the most general rotationally and chirally symmetric EOM for theta at second order in derivatives.
    The five-parameter structure is asserted from symmetry; if a symmetry-allowed term were missed, the flow equations would change.
  • domain assumption The noise amplitude D and the coefficient gamma of the time derivative are not renormalized.
    Used to obtain d_l D = d_l gamma = 0 in Eqs. (54) and (71), relying on Refs. [23,28,29] for the non-renormalization of the zero mode.
  • standard math Wetterich equation and the MSRDJ mapping are exact for this Langevin system with a causal regulator.
    Standard field-theoretic background used without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of True and Quasi Long-Range Order in Malthusian Flocks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDCU5QKG

@misc{pith2026260805851,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: True and Quasi Long-Range Order in Malthusian Flocks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDCU5QKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05851}
}
read the original abstract

Living matter undergoes continuous turnover. The hydrodynamic theory of Malthusian flocks describes polar active matter with turnover, but its phase diagram and nonlinear scaling behavior is not well understood. Using a nonperturbative renormalization group approach, rotationally invariant to second order in derivatives, and without defects, we explicitly obtain the strong-coupling fixed point governing true long-range order, uncover a quasi long-range ordered phase, and identify a critical point similar to, but distinct from the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless universality class at the transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05851 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Nonperturbative Renormalization group flow for ¯µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Chat´ e and A

    H. Chat´ e and A. Solon, Dynamic scaling of two- dimensional polar flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 268302 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [43]

    Sezik and G

    E. Sezik and G. Pruessner, to be published

    work page

  3. [1]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  4. [2]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  5. [3]

    Vicsek, A

    T. Vicsek, A. Czir´ ok, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Physical Review Letters75, 1226 (1995)

    1995

  6. [4]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Long-range order in a two- dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly to- gether, Physical Review Letters75, 4326 (1995)

    1995

  7. [5]

    Chat´ e, Dry aligning dilute active matter, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics11, 189 (2020)

    H. Chat´ e, Dry aligning dilute active matter, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics11, 189 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [6]

    Alert and X

    R. Alert and X. Trepat, Physical models of collective cell migration, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 77 (2020)

    2020

Show all 82 references
  1. [7]

    Toner,The Physics of Flocking: Birth, Death, and Flight in Active Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    J. Toner,The Physics of Flocking: Birth, Death, and Flight in Active Matter(Cambridge University Press, 2024)

    2024

  2. [8]

    Dombrowski, L

    C. Dombrowski, L. Cisneros, S. Chatkaew, R. E. Gold- stein, and J. O. Kessler, Self-concentration and large- scale coherence in bacterial dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103 (2004)

    2004

  3. [9]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbu- lence, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13, 143 (2022)

    2022

  4. [10]

    Fily and M

    Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 235702 (2012)

    2012

  5. [11]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase sep- aration, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  6. [12]

    Hallatschek, S

    O. Hallatschek, S. S. Datta, K. Drescher, J. Dunkel, J. El- geti, B. Waclaw, and N. S. Wingreen, Proliferating active matter, Nature Reviews Physics5, 407 (2023)

    2023

  7. [13]

    Pellettieri and A

    J. Pellettieri and A. S. Alvarado, Cell turnover and adult tissue homeostasis: From humans to planarians, Annual Review of Genetics41, 83 (2007)

    2007

  8. [14]

    L. E. O’Brien, Tissue homeostasis and non-homeostasis: From cell life cycles to organ states, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology38, 395 (2022)

    2022

  9. [15]

    Mao and S

    Y. Mao and S. A. Wickstr¨ om, Mechanical state transi- tions in the regulation of tissue form and function, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology25, 654 (2024)

    2024

  10. [16]

    Hiraiwa and G

    T. Hiraiwa and G. Salbreux, Role of turnover in active stress generation in a filament network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 188101 (2016)

    2016

  11. [17]

    H. V. Goodson and E. M. Jonasson, Microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins, Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology10, a022608 (2018)

    2018

  12. [18]

    Banerjee, M

    S. Banerjee, M. L. Gardel, and U. S. Schwarz, The actin cytoskeleton as an active adaptive material, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics11, 421 (2020)

    2020

  13. [19]

    B. L. Goode, J. Eskin, and S. Shekhar, Mechanisms of actin disassembly and turnover, Journal of Cell Biology 222, e202309021 (2023)

    2023

  14. [20]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  15. [21]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  16. [22]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, Hydrodynamics, renormaliza- tion group, and universality classes far from equilibrium (2026), arXiv:2607.02318 [cond-mat.soft]

    2026 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Toner and Y

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, Flocks, herds, and schools: A quan- titative theory of flocking, Physical Review E58, 4828 (1998)

    1998

  18. [25]

    Toner, Reanalysis of the hydrodynamic theory of fluid, polar-ordered flocks, Physical Review E86, 031918 (2012)

    J. Toner, Reanalysis of the hydrodynamic theory of fluid, polar-ordered flocks, Physical Review E86, 031918 (2012)

    2012

  19. [26]

    Besse, H

    M. Besse, H. Chat´ e, and A. Solon, Metastability of constant-density flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 268003 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    Di Carlo and M

    L. Di Carlo and M. Scandolo, Evidence of fluctuation- induced first-order phase transition in active matter, New Journal of Physics24, 123032 (2022)

    2022

  21. [31]

    T. R. Morris, The exact renormalization group and ap- proximate solutions, International Journal of Modern Physics A09, 2411 (1994)

    1994

  22. [33]

    Kopietz, L

    P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Sch¨ utz,Introduction to 6 the Functional Renormalization Group(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  23. [34]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonper- turbative functional renormalization group and its appli- cations, Physics Reports910, 1 (2021)

    2021

  24. [35]

    Balog, H

    I. Balog, H. Chat´ e, B. Delamotte, M. Marohni´ c, and N. Wschebor, Convergence of nonperturbative approx- imations to the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240604 (2019)

    2019

  25. [36]

    De Polsi, I

    G. De Polsi, I. Balog, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Preci- sion calculation of critical exponents in the O(N) univer- sality classes with the nonperturbative renormalization group, Phys. Rev. E101, 042113 (2020)

    2020

  26. [37]

    Delamotte, G

    B. Delamotte, G. De Polsi, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Conformal invariance and composite operators: A strat- egy for improving the derivative expansion of the non- perturbative renormalization group, Phys. Rev. E109, 064152 (2024)

    2024

  27. [38]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, Critical phenomena in com- pressible polar active fluids: Dynamical and functional renormalization group studies, Physical Review Research 5, 023061 (2023)

    2023

  28. [39]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, New universality class de- scribes Vicsek’s flocking phase in physical dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 128301 (2024)

    2024

  29. [40]

    Daviet and N

    R. Daviet and N. Dupuis, Nonperturbative functional renormalization-group approach to the sine-Gordon model and the Lukyanov-Zamolodchikov conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 155301 (2019)

    2019

  30. [41]

    Daviet and N

    R. Daviet and N. Dupuis, Flowing bosonization in the nonperturbative functional renormalization-group ap- proach, SciPost Phys.12, 110 (2022)

    2022

  31. [42]

    Jentsch, R

    P. Jentsch, R. Daviet, N. Dupuis, and S. Floerchinger, Physical properties of the massive Schwinger model from the nonperturbative functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D105, 016028 (2022)

    2022

  32. [44]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group i. classical systems, Sov. Phys.—JETP32, 493 (1971)

    1971

  33. [45]

    V. L. Berezinskii, Destruction of long-range order in one-dimensional and two-dimensional systems having a continuous symmetry group ii. quantum systems, Sov. Phys.—JETP34, 610 (1972)

    1972

  34. [46]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  35. [47]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for more details on the derivation of flow equa- tions, the relationship to the Dynamical Renormalization Group approach, and Refs. [65–67]

  36. [48]

    Canet, H

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e, and B. Delamotte, General frame- work of the non-perturbative renormalization group for non-equilibrium steady states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical44, 495001 (2011)

    2011

  37. [50]

    De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes cri- tiques, Le Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    C. De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes cri- tiques, Le Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  38. [51]

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  39. [52]

    Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    J. Cardy,Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    1996

  40. [53]

    Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007)

    M. Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007)

    2007

  41. [54]

    L. Chen, C. F. Lee, A. Maitra, and J. Toner, Dynam- ics of packed swarms: Time-displaced correlators of two- dimensional incompressible flocks, Phys. Rev. E109, L012601 (2024)

    2024

  42. [55]

    Forster, D

    D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, Large- distance and long-time properties of a randomly stirred fluid, Phys. Rev. A16, 732 (1977)

    1977

  43. [56]

    Jakubczyk, N

    P. Jakubczyk, N. Dupuis, and B. Delamotte, Reexami- nation of the nonperturbative renormalization-group ap- proach to the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, Phys. Rev. E90, 062105 (2014)

    2014

  44. [57]

    Defenu, A

    N. Defenu, A. Trombettoni, I. N´ andori, and T. Enss, Nonperturbative renormalization group treatment of am- plitude fluctuations for|φ| 4 topological phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B96, 174505 (2017)

    2017

  45. [58]

    Villain, Theory of one- and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane

    J. Villain, Theory of one- and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. ii. the planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet, J. Phys. France36, 581 (1975)

    1975

  46. [59]

    L. M. Sieberer, G. Wachtel, E. Altman, and S. Diehl, Lat- tice duality for the compact Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equa- tion, Phys. Rev. B94, 104521 (2016)

    2016

  47. [60]

    Shankar, S

    S. Shankar, S. Ramaswamy, M. C. Marchetti, and M. J. Bowick, Defect unbinding in active nematics, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 108002 (2018)

    2018

  48. [61]

    J¨ ulicher, J

    F. J¨ ulicher, J. Prost, and J. Toner, Broken living layers: Dislocations in active smectic liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E106, 054607 (2022)

    2022

  49. [62]

    X.-q. Shi, F. Cheng, and H. Chat´ e, Extreme spontaneous deformations of active crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 108301 (2023)

    2023

  50. [63]

    L. N. Carenza, J.-M. Armengol-Collado, D. Krommy- das, and L. Giomi, Quasi-long-ranged order in two- dimensional active liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 128304 (2025)

    2025

  51. [64]

    Hirota and N

    Y. Hirota and N. Uchida, Defect binding-unbinding tran- sition in active nematic membranes, Phys. Rev. E113, 055412 (2026)

    2026

  52. [65]

    Balog, G

    I. Balog, G. De Polsi, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Con- formal invariance in the nonperturbative renormalization group: A rationale for choosing the regulator, Phys. Rev. E101, 062146 (2020)

    2020

  53. [70]

    Carrying out the frequency integral

  54. [71]

    Carrying out the scale derivative

  55. [72]

    Malthusian NPRG Smooth Regulator.nb

    Carrying out the momentum integral 8 Applying all these steps yields the flow equations for the couplings, ∂ℓD=∂ lγ= 0, (54) ∂ℓλ=− D(2−η y) 16πγ q µxµ3y λ µx +µ y −µ 3 ,(55) ∂ℓµx = D(2−η y) 16πγ q µxµ3y 2µ2 3 −3µ 3(µx −µ y) +µ 2 x −6µ xµy + 5µ2 y ,(56) ∂ℓµy = D(2−η y) 16πγ q µ...

  56. [73]

    Multiplication of the Matrices (36)-(42) and integration over contracted momenta to obtain expressions for the diagrams (52) and (53)

  57. [74]

    Projection of the flow equations for full two- and three-point functions onto the couplings via (24)-(32)

  58. [75]

    (35) is set to zero

    The termQ k in Eq. (35) is set to zero

  59. [76]

    The frequency integral is carried out 5.Dis replaced viaD→DΘ(q y −k)

  60. [77]

    The scale derivative turns the Heaviside function in tokδ(q y −k), enabling straightforward evaluation of theq y integral

  61. [78]

    Malthusian NPRG Sharp Regulator.nb

    The integration overq x is carried out. The resulting flow equations are, ∂lD=∂ lγ= 0, (71) ∂lλ=− D 8πγ q µxµ3y λ µx +µ y −µ 3 ,(72) ∂lµx = D 8πγ q µxµ3y 2µ2 3 −3µ 3(µx −µ y) +µ 2 x −6µ xµy + 5µ2 y ,(73) ∂lµy = D 8πγ q µxµ3y 5 4 λ2 k2 + µy µx 2µ2 3 −3µ 3(µx −µ y) + 5µ2 x −6µ x...

  62. [79]

    Toner, Birth, death, and flight: A theory of Malthusian flocks, Physical Review Letters108, 088102 (2012)

    J. Toner, Birth, death, and flight: A theory of Malthusian flocks, Physical Review Letters108, 088102 (2012)

    2012

  63. [80]

    Chat´ e and A

    H. Chat´ e and A. Solon, Dynamic scaling of two-dimensional polar flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 268302 (2024)

    2024

  64. [81]

    L. Chen, P. Jentsch, C. F. Lee, A. Maitra, S. Ramaswamy, and J. Toner, The inconvenient truth about flocks (2025), arXiv:2503.17064 [cond-mat.soft]

    2025 arXiv

  65. [82]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Physical Review A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  66. [83]

    De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques, Le Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    C. De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques, Le Journal de Physique Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  67. [84]

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  68. [85]

    Canet, H

    L. Canet, H. Chat´ e, and B. Delamotte, General framework of the non-perturbative renormalization group for non- equilibrium steady states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical44, 495001 (2011). 13

    2011

  69. [86]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Physics Letters B301, 90 (1993)

    1993

  70. [87]

    T. R. Morris, The exact renormalization group and approximate solutions, International Journal of Modern Physics A09, 2411 (1994)

    1994

  71. [88]

    Ellwanger, Flow equations forNpoint functions and bound states, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik C Particles and Fields62, 503 (1994)

    U. Ellwanger, Flow equations forNpoint functions and bound states, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik C Particles and Fields62, 503 (1994)

    1994

  72. [89]

    Balog, G

    I. Balog, G. De Polsi, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Conformal invariance in the nonperturbative renormalization group: A rationale for choosing the regulator, Phys. Rev. E101, 062146 (2020)

    2020

  73. [90]

    Canet, Strong-coupling fixed point of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation (2009), arXiv:cond-mat/0509541 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    L. Canet, Strong-coupling fixed point of the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation (2009), arXiv:cond-mat/0509541 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [91]

    Jentsch and C

    P. Jentsch and C. F. Lee, Can exact scaling exponents be obtained using the renormalization group? affirmative evidence from incompressible polar active fluids (2024), arXiv:2307.06725 [cond-mat.soft]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.