Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Three-Loop Five-Point CK-Dual Amplitudes and UV Structure in N=4 SYM and N=8 SUGRA

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A manifestly color-kinematics-dual integrand exists for the three-loop five-point amplitudes of N=4 super-Yang-Mills, and its double copy yields the corresponding N=8 supergravity integrand.

desk verdict A genuine first construction with a real completeness caveat; referee it, but ask for the D-dimensional lift to be stated far more carefully. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.05973 v1 pith:VU4YJZ3V submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th

Zhiming Cai , Zeyu Li , Gang Yang , Guorui Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T1881T6083E50
keywords color-kinematicsdualitydoublecopyN=4super-Yang-MillsN=8supergravitythree-loopfive-pointintegrandgeneralizedunitarityultravioletdivergenceevanescentterm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the full-color three-loop five-point scattering integrand of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory can be written in a form where kinematic numerator factors obey the same Jacobi identities as the color factors --- color-kinematics duality --- and that squaring this representation through the double copy produces the corresponding $\mathcal{N}=8$ supergravity integrand. It constructs this integrand explicitly from two master topologies, imposing diagram symmetries and generalized-unitarity cuts, and verifies the result with an independent construction built on a smaller symmetry. Using the representation, it extracts the ultraviolet pole at the critical dimension $D_c=6$ for both amplitudes. It then studies how the four-dimensional construction lifts to generic $D$-dimensional external states, finding a replacement rule that matches string theory for the gauge-theory pole but not for the gravity pole, which differs by an evanescent term. A curious reader would care because this is the first explicit three-loop five-point color-kinematics-dual data and a concrete probe of dimensional continuation.

What carries the argument

The engine is a master-numerator ansatz. Two planar topologies act as master graphs; imposing dual Jacobi relations $N_s=N_t+N_u$ on every four-point subgraph generates all 42 numerators from these two masters. The master numerators are expanded in the five-point supersymmetric prefactors $\beta_{12345}$ and $\gamma_{ij}$, built from spinor brackets and supermomentum delta functions, multiplied by Mandelstam invariants and loop-momentum contractions; after quotienting momentum-weighted identities there are 772 parameters, which S5 symmetry reduces to 35 and the first of 13 four-dimensional generalized-unitarity cuts reduces to five, the remaining cuts and Jacobi relations then being automatic and the leftover parameters canceling under integrand reduction. An independent S3 x S2 construction gives the same amplitude. For the ultraviolet analysis, setting external momenta to zero reduces the integrands to two three-loop vacuum master integrals whose $1/\epsilon$ poles are known, and the external-state lift is implemented by replacing $\gamma_{ij}$ with $\gamma^D_{ij}$, defined through $D$-dimensional tree amplitudes and the five-point Gram determinant.

What would settle it

Compute the three-loop five-point $\mathcal{N}=8$ supergravity UV pole in $D=6$ with a fully $D$-dimensional method, for instance a pure-spinor-style construction with all external states kept in $D$ dimensions, and compare it with both the $\gamma^D$-lift of Eq. (8) and the closed-string-inspired formula (9). If the fully $D$-dimensional result matches Eq. (9) but not the lift, the evanescent mismatch of Eq. (10) is real and the CK-dual representation fails for generic external states; if it matches the lift instead, the string comparison rather than the representation is what breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the complete three-loop five-point $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM amplitude admits a manifestly CK-dual integrand: 42 trivalent graph topologies, with numerators generated from two master topologies by dual Jacobi relations, at most quadratic in loop momenta, and fixed uniquely up to generalized-gauge freedom. Double copy of these numerators yields the $\mathcal{N}=8$ supergravity integrand. At $D_c=6$, the SYM ultraviolet pole contains no double-trace term, has color dependence $N_c^3+36\zeta_3 N_c$, and matches the two-loop five-point single-trace structure, while the SUGRA pole is the expression in Eq. (8), agreeing with the closed-string-inspired prediction for four-dimensional external states. Replacing the four-dimensional prefactors $\gamma_{ij}$ by $D$-dimensional tree-level expressions $\gamma^D_{ij}$ reproduces the open-string prediction for the SYM pole at generic kinematics, but for gravity the same replacement differs from the string-inspired result by the evanescent combination $E$ that vanishes in four dimensions. The paper therefore concludes that the four-dimensional representation, although complete as a four-dimensional amplitude, does not by itself determine the full integrand of the higher-dimensional theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the integrand fixed by four-dimensional generalized-unitarity cuts and symmetry, up to terms that cancel when integrated, already contains all loop-momentum information needed for any spacetime dimension, and that the same expression describes external particles living in $D$ dimensions once the four-dimensional prefactors are replaced by $D$-dimensional tree-level prefactors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The explicit full-color integrand and its dual-Jacobi-satisfying numerators are provided in the ancillary files, giving a compact representation of all nonplanar information at three loops and five points.
  • Because only one copy needs to satisfy color-kinematics duality, pairing these numerators with a valid cubic-graph representation of a less-supersymmetric gauge theory yields gravity integrands with fewer than eight supercharges.
  • The five-point SYM ultraviolet pole fixes the five-field matrix element of the counterterm operator $O_{ct}$, which also reproduces the four-point divergence and is on-shell equivalent to the $\alpha'^3$ effective action.
  • With generic $D$-dimensional external states, the SYM pole computed with the $\gamma^D$ replacement reproduces the open-string prediction, while the corresponding SUGRA pole differs from the closed-string-inspired result by an evanescent term, so four-dimensional data alone do not determine the $D$-dimensional gravity integrand.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extrapolation is that any successful $D$-dimensional completion must include transverse and parity-odd pieces invisible to the four-dimensional ansatz, which is exactly the kind of data a pure-spinor-style construction would provide.
  • The pattern of the evanescent mismatch --- a constant at one loop, $\sum s^2$ at two loops, $\sum s^3$ at three loops --- hints at a uniform iterative formula for the lift failure that the four-loop five-point amplitude could test.
  • If the two-term operator $O_{ct}$ continues to reproduce higher-point matrix elements of the $D^2F^4 + F^5$ counterterm, then the operator structure of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM at this order would be fixed by a single on-shell operator, a stronger statement than the four- and five-point checks made here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a three-loop five-point full-color N=4 SYM integrand in a manifestly color-kinematics-dual representation, starting from two master topologies and using both S5 and S3×S2 symmetric ansätze. It reports that the two constructions agree after integrand reduction, that the remaining free parameters are generalized gauge degrees of freedom, and that the double copy of the CK-dual numerators gives the corresponding N=8 SUGRA integrand. The authors extract the UV poles at Dc=6 for four-dimensional external states: the SYM pole in Eq. (6) contains no double-trace terms and matches the three-loop four-point color dependence, while the SUGRA pole in Eq. (8) is expressed in terms of the five-point γij structures. The paper then considers a D-dimensional lift γ→γD built from D-dimensional tree amplitudes, which reproduces the open-string prediction for the SYM UV pole but yields a SUGRA pole that differs from the string-inspired expression by the evanescent combination E in Eqs. (10)–(11).

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial technical milestone: it would be the first explicit full-color three-loop five-point CK-dual integrand, with compact numerators at most quadratic in loop momenta, a double-copy SUGRA integrand, and new UV counterterm data at Dc=6. The paper is honest about the D-dimensional difficulty and explicitly displays the evanescent mismatch, which is a useful falsifiable statement. The two independent symmetry constructions and the ancillary data are strengths. However, the central completeness claim for the full D-dimensional loop-momentum information is not supported by the presented evidence and is directly challenged by the paper's own Eq. (10); the four-dimensional-external UV results may well be correct, but the manuscript needs reframing and additional checks before the broader claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [CK-DUAL INTEGRAND CONSTRUCTION, paragraph beginning 'Although we use four-dimensional cuts...'] This paragraph asserts that the four-dimensional generalized-unitarity cuts capture the full D-dimensional loop-momentum information, with three supporting checks. The paper's own Eqs. (10)–(11) contradict that assertion: replacing γ by γD built from D-dimensional tree amplitudes is exactly the operation that tests the external-state lift, and the double-copied UV pole differs from the string-inspired result by E, which is nonzero for generic D-dimensional external states. The three listed checks verify integrated SYM quantities or a single integrated pole, but none verifies that the numerator-level representation used in the double copy of Eq. (4) is complete in D dimensions. Please either remove the completeness claim or supply a genuine D-dimensional cut check, for example by evaluating the lifted integrand on cuts with generic D-dimensional external momenta.
  2. [Eq. (7) and the γD lift] The replacement γij→γDij is introduced as a 'candidate operation', but the paper does not verify that γD obeys the algebraic identities used to construct the ansatz, such as ∑i γij=0, antisymmetry, and the momentum-weighted identities exemplified by Eq. (3). The reduction from 772 to 35 parameters and the S5-symmetric solution rely on quotienting by these identities; applying the replacement to a solution of the four-dimensional ansatz is therefore not automatically valid. Please demonstrate that γD satisfies these identities, or explicitly state that Eq. (10) is evidence that the four-dimensional solution does not directly lift to D dimensions.
  3. [CK-DUAL INTEGRAND CONSTRUCTION, five free parameters and S5 vs S3×S2 comparison] The five free parameters are said to cancel 'after integrand reduction', and the S5 and S3×S2 constructions agree 'after integrand reduction'. Since the double copy in Eq. (4) is an integrand-level operation, equality after integration is not sufficient: terms that integrate to zero in the SYM amplitude can contribute to the gravity integrand unless they are generalized gauge transformations of the numerator representation. Please state explicitly that the five-parameter family and the two constructions are related by generalized gauge transformations that leave the double-copy integrand invariant (up to integration by parts and total derivatives), or provide the explicit transformation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [UV divergence in SYM] In the sentence 'this replacement makes Eq. (6) agree prefectly with the result predicted by the open-string expansion', 'prefectly' should read 'perfectly'.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The displayed formula for the SYM UV pole appears to have an unbalanced bracket or parenthesis; please check the typesetting and define the 'perms' that follow the Tr12345 term, including the exact permutation set.
  3. [Ancillary files] The central claims rely on ancillary files for all explicit numerator data, but the text does not describe the file format or display any master numerator. Please include at least one explicit master numerator and a short description of the ancillary data structure in the main text or an appendix.
  4. [Eq. (10)] The prefactor ∑i<j s³ij and the use of G5 are not fully specified in the text; please define the range of the summation and state explicitly that G5 is the five-point Gram determinant defined in Eq. (7).
  5. [Summary and Discussion, operator Oct in Eq. (12)] The claim that the simple two-term operator Oct reproduces the UV divergences of both four- and five-point amplitudes is stated without derivation; please indicate how the kinematic structure of Eq. (6) maps to the components of Oct, or provide a reference where this identification is made.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the CK-dual integrand is solved from symmetries and cuts, and the UV poles are validated against independent string predictions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The claimed CK-dual integrand is obtained by writing a general ansatz over two master topologies (330 and 570 candidate terms, reduced by gamma_ij identities to 281 and 491 independent monomials, 772 total), imposing S5 automorphism symmetries (to 35 coefficients), and then imposing a spanning set of 13 four-dimensional generalized-unitarity cuts (to 5 parameters). These five parameters are shown to cancel after D-dimensional integrand reduction, and an independent S3 x S2 construction yields the same integrand after reduction. The UV poles in Eqs. (6) and (8) are outputs of this integrand, not inputs; they are then compared with open- and closed-string predictions from refs. [12,24,25], which are external to this paper's authors. The only noticeable self-citation is ref. [15] for the integrand-reduction method and for the S3 x S2 motivation; this is a computational tool, not an assumed conclusion, and the S5 route does not depend on it. The admitted limitation that the four-dimensional representation 'ceases to determine the full integrands of higher-dimensional theories', evidenced by the evanescent mismatch in Eqs. (10)-(11), is a completeness caveat about the D-dimensional lift, not a circularity: the four-dimensional result is still derived, and the mismatch is discovered rather than assumed. No step defines a predicted quantity in terms of the fitted input, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. Hence the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free numerical parameters are fitted to data in this work; the 772 ansatz coefficients are fixed by symmetry and unitarity cuts, and the residual five or 57 parameters are generalized gauge degrees of freedom that cancel in the integrated amplitude. The result rests on five domain assumptions from prior literature, the most fragile being the completeness of the cut set for D-dimensional loop integrands.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The no-triangle property of N=4 SYM excludes all topologies containing triangle or bubble subgraphs.
    Used to restrict the 42 topologies in Fig. 2; property from prior literature, not rederived.
  • domain assumption A one-loop n-point subgraph carries at most n-4 powers of loop momentum.
    From [10]; controls the monomial basis of the master numerators (330 and 570 candidate terms).
  • domain assumption The beta and gamma prefactors of [11] form a complete basis for the five-point external-state dependence, and the momentum-weighted identities are fully quotiented.
    Basis for the ansatz; the paper gives only one example identity (Eq. 3).
  • domain assumption The UV poles of the two vacuum master integrals are those quoted in Eq. (5) from [18].
    The final UV pole expressions (6) and (8) scale with these pole values.
  • domain assumption The 13 generalized-unitarity cuts form a spanning set that fixes the integrand up to terms that vanish after integration.
    Core completeness assumption for the CK-dual construction; the authors offer two symmetry schemes and string-prediction agreement as indirect support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-Loop Five-Point CK-Dual Amplitudes and UV Structure in N=4 SYM and N=8 SUGRA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VU4YJZ3V

@misc{pith2026260805973,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-Loop Five-Point CK-Dual Amplitudes and UV Structure in N=4 SYM and N=8 SUGRA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VU4YJZ3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.05973}
}
read the original abstract

We construct the complete full-color three-loop five-point integrand of N=4 super-Yang--Mills theory in a representation that manifestly satisfies color--kinematics duality. Its double copy gives the corresponding N=8 supergravity integrand. For four-dimensional external states, we evaluate the ultraviolet poles of both amplitudes in the critical dimension, Dc=6. Extending the external-state dependence to D dimensions is subtle. We consider a candidate replacement of the four-dimensional prefactors by expressions built from D-dimensional tree amplitudes. It reproduces the open-string prediction for the SYM pole with generic D-dimensional external states, whereas the corresponding gravity expression differs from the string-inspired one by an evanescent term.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.05973 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Color-kinematics duality at loop level: the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. All 42 non-isomorphic trivalent topologies for the fi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The spanning set of 13 generalized-unitarity cuts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The double cut for three-point form factor inspired [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Jo- hansson, Phys.Rev.Lett. 105, 061602 (2010) , arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  2. [1]

    Under the full S5 symmetry, there are 42 inequivalent topologies, shown in Fig

    Us- ing the no-triangle property of N = 4 SYM, we exclude all topologies containing triangle and bubble subgraphs. Under the full S5 symmetry, there are 42 inequivalent topologies, shown in Fig

    work page

  3. [2]

    Imposing dual Jacobi relations on all four-point subgraphs then gener- ates the remaining 40 numerators from the two masters

    We take the first two, (1) and (2), as the planar master topologies. Imposing dual Jacobi relations on all four-point subgraphs then gener- ates the remaining 40 numerators from the two masters. To construct the ansatz for the master numerators, we expand them in the five-point supersymmetric prefactors βijklm and γij introduced in [11]. For the MHV super- ...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Z. Bern, T. Dennen, Y.-t. Huang, and M. Kiermaier, Phys. Rev. D82, 065003 (2010) , arXiv:1004.0693 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [4]

    Permutations mixing the two sets generate additional distinct graphs and re- quire a larger spanning set of unitarity cuts

    In this construction, the external legs split into two sets {p1, p2, p3} and {p4, p5}. Permutations mixing the two sets generate additional distinct graphs and re- quire a larger spanning set of unitarity cuts. The re- sulting solution contains 57 free parameters; after inte- grand reduction, it yields the same amplitude as the S5- 3 p1 p2 p3 p5 p4 F (0) ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Their UV poles are [18] V (A)⏐ ⏐ UV = − 1 6(4π)9ǫ , V (B)⏐ ⏐ UV = − ζ3 − 1 3 6(4π)9ǫ . (5) FIG. 5. The two three-loop vacuum integrals V (A) and V (B) that capture the UV divergence of the amplitudes. Lines marked with red dots denote double propagators. UV divergence in SYM Six of the 42 topologies contribute to the SYM UV divergence: (37)–(42) in Fig. 2...

    work page

  7. [6]

    However, as we will see below, this suc- cess does not proceed to the gravity case

    agree prefectly with the result predicted by the open-string expansion at generic kine- matics [12, 25]. However, as we will see below, this suc- cess does not proceed to the gravity case. 4 UV divergence in SUGRA For gravity, after the double copy, more topologies con- tribute to the UV poles, and their numerators require tensor reduction through rank fo...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, (2019), arXiv:1909.01358 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 35 references
  1. [8]

    agrees with the closed-string-inspired expres- sion [25]: M(3) 5 |string UV = −i ( κ 2 ) 9 20ζ3 (4π)9ǫ (9) ×  A(0) (1,2,3,5,4) A(0) (1,3,2,5,4)   T · S0 · (M3)2 ·  A(0) (1,2,3,4,5) A(0) (1,3,2,4,5)   , where S0 is the KLT kernel and M3 is a matrix of Man- delstam invar...

  2. [9]

    Z. Bern, J. Carrasco, and H. Jo- hansson, Phys.Rev. D78, 085011 (2008) , arXiv:0805.3993 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  3. [10]

    This suggests that the discrepancy may have a systematic simple pattern for general loops

    by a constant and ( ∑ s2 ij), respectively. This suggests that the discrepancy may have a systematic simple pattern for general loops. SUMMAR Y AND DISCUSSION We have constructed the complete three-loop five-point integrand in N = 4 SYM in a manifestly CK-dual form, and its dou...

  4. [12]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 161602 (2009) , arXiv:0907.1425 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Stieberger, (2009), arXiv:0907.2211 [hep-th]

    S. Stieberger, (2009), arXiv:0907.2211 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    B. Feng, R. Huang, and Y. Jia, Phys. Lett. B695, 350 (2011) , arXiv:1004.3417 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Jo- hansson, and R. Roiban, J. Phys. A 55, 443003 (2022) , arXiv:2203.13013 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Adamo, J

    T. Adamo, J. J. M. Carrasco, M. Carrillo-Gonz´ alez, M. Chiodaroli, H. Elvang, H. Johansson, D. O’Connell, R. Roiban, and O. Schlotterer, in 2022 Snowmass Sum- mer Study (2022) arXiv:2204.06547 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Z. Bern, J. Carrasco, L. Dixon, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, Phys.Rev. D85, 105014 (2012) , arXiv:1201.5366 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. J. Carrasco and H. Johans- son, Phys.Rev. D85, 025006 (2012) , arXiv:1106.4711 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  11. [19]

    C. R. Mafra and O. Schlotterer, JHEP 10, 124 , arXiv:1505.02746 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johansson, D. A. Kosower, and R. Roiban, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 161303 (2007) , arXiv:hep-th/0702112

    2007 arXiv

  13. [21]

    R. H. Boels, B. A. Kniehl, O. V. Tarasov, and G. Yang, JHEP 1302, 063 , arXiv:1211.7028 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    G. Lin, G. Yang, and S. Zhang, JHEP 03, 061 , arXiv:2111.03021 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    A. A. Vladimirov, Theor. Math. Phys. 43, 417 (1980)

    1980

  16. [24]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and V. A. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B 144, 419 (1984)

    1984

  17. [25]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johans- son, and R. Roiban, Phys. Rev. D 78, 105019 (2008) , arXiv:0808.4112 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, L. J. Dixon, H. Johans- son, and R. Roiban, Phys. Rev. D 82, 125040 (2010) , arXiv:1008.3327 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Berkovits, M

    N. Berkovits, M. B. Green, J. G. Russo, and P. Vanhove, JHEP 11, 063 , arXiv:0908.1923 [hep-th]

    1923 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bossard, P

    G. Bossard, P. S. Howe, and K. S. Stelle, Phys. Lett. B 682, 137 (2009) , arXiv:0908.3883 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Bjornsson and M

    J. Bjornsson and M. B. Green, JHEP 08, 132 , arXiv:1004.2692 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, D. C. Dunbar, M. Perelstein, and J. S. Rozowsky, Nucl. Phys. B 530, 401 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802162

    1998 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Broedel and J

    J. Broedel and J. J. M. Car- rasco, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085009 (2011) , arXiv:1107.4802 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Schlotterer and S

    O. Schlotterer and S. Stieberger, J. Phys. A 46, 475401 (2013) , arXiv:1205.1516 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Koerber and A

    P. Koerber and A. Sevrin, JHEP 10, 003 , arXiv:hep-th/0108169

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    L. A. Barreiro and R. Medina, JHEP 10, 108 , arXiv:1208.6066 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Chicherin, Y

    D. Chicherin, Y. Wu, Z. Wu, Y. Xu, S.-Q. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2512.17330 [hep-ph]

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.