Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 147 references

The Quantum Mechanics of Rare Events: From Quantum Walks to Stochastic Inflation

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that rare fluctuations in quantum walks obey a measured-entropy large-deviation principle and that this makes stochastic inflation in de Sitter violate detailed balance.

desk verdict A sound but largely reformulative large-deviation framework for quantum walks, with genuinely new applications and a fragile cosmological KMS claim that the abstract overstates. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06319 v1 pith:GIMC6AIS submitted 2026-08-06 hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-phquant-ph

Daniel Green , Kshitij Gupta , Akhil Premkumar This is my paper
classification hep-thastro-ph.COgr-qchep-phquant-ph
keywords largedeviationtheoryquantumwalksmeasurement-inducedrelativeentropyopensystemsstochasticinflationKMSsymmetrydetailedbalancedeSitterspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that rare fluctuations in quantum systems can be described with the thermodynamic tools of classical large-deviation theory, provided the entropy is measured after projection onto the basis selected by the system's coupling. Its central result is that for a quantum walk with independent, identically distributed steps, the probability of an empirical step distribution decays exponentially with the number of steps at a rate given by the measurement-induced relative entropy, and the tail of the walker's position comes from minimizing that entropy together with the initial-state cost. Applied to an anharmonic oscillator, this explains when thermal classical tails give way to quantum WKB tails. Applied to stochastic inflation, it yields the claim that long-wavelength fields on a fixed de Sitter background reach a stationary density matrix that breaks KMS symmetry and violates detailed balance, with infinite housekeeping entropy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the measurement-induced relative entropy $D_{\mathcal M}(\sigma\|\chi)=D_{\mathrm{KL}}(\sigma_{\mathcal M}\|\chi_{\mathcal M})$, defined by first projecting both density matrices onto the measurement basis $\mathcal M$; for a quantum walk this basis is fixed by the coupling that produces each step. Its building block is the quantum fidelity $F(\Sigma\|\chi^{\otimes N})=\mathrm{Tr}\sqrt{\sqrt{\Sigma}\chi^{\otimes N}\sqrt{\Sigma}}$, which gives the probability of a particular sequence of step outcomes and, after summing over orderings, yields the entropy exponent. The calculations also rely on Schwinger-Keldysh influence functionals in Keldysh variables $x_c$, $x_q$ to find semiclassical saddles, and on KMS symmetry, the imaginary-time periodicity that enforces detailed balance, to construct time-reversed thermal instantons. In the cosmological section, the load-bearing input is the Wigner-function Fokker-Planck equation from exact renormalization in which the diffusion matrix has $D_{xx}=H^3/8\pi^2$ but $D_{pp}=0$; with this input, the steady-state currents are irreversible and the housekeeping entropy diverges.

What would settle it

Include $D_{pp}\neq 0$ momentum noise in the Wigner evolution for a light scalar on fixed de Sitter, solve for the stationary distribution, and test whether it satisfies the KMS imaginary-time periodicity condition; a KMS-symmetric steady state with finite currents would overturn the paper's cosmological claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for a quantum walk whose steps are independent and identically distributed in a fixed measurement basis, the probability of an empirical step distribution $\sigma_s$ decays as $P(\sigma_s)=\exp(-N D_s(\sigma_s\|\chi))$, where $D_s$ is the measurement-induced relative entropy obtained by projecting both $\sigma$ and the single-step density matrix $\chi$ onto the step basis. The tail probability for the walker to land at $x$ is then the constrained minimum $-\log P(x)=\min_{\sigma_s,x_0}\left(N D_s(\sigma_s\|\chi)-\log \rho_0(x_0,x_0)\right)$, a quantum analogue of Sanov's theorem and the contraction principle. The authors show that this thermodynamic minimization reproduces the anharmonic oscillator's crossover from thermal $\exp(-\beta V)$ tails to quantum WKB tails, and that the WKB wavefunction alone gives a lower bound on any tail when the noise cannot be computed. Applied to stochastic inflation, the same formalism yields the cosmological conclusion: the Wigner evolution of a light scalar on fixed de Sitter space, with noise acting only on the field and not on its momentum, reaches a stationary state that breaks the KMS condition and violates detailed balance, producing formally infinite housekeeping entropy.

Load-bearing premise

The cosmological KMS-breaking conclusion rests on the assumption that coarse-graining a light scalar in de Sitter produces noise in the field direction only, never in its momentum; if a more complete treatment includes momentum noise, the steady state may satisfy KMS symmetry and the detailed-balance violation would disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Rare-event probabilities for open quantum systems can be computed as a minimization of measurement-induced relative entropy, giving open quantum systems a thermodynamic description analogous to classical Sanov theory.
  • For the anharmonic oscillator at finite temperature, the tail crosses from $\exp(-\beta V(x))$ to WKB behavior when $\beta\sqrt{V''/m}\sim 1$, identifying the scale beyond which off-diagonal density-matrix elements control rare fluctuations.
  • Even when the noise source is not calculable, the WKB wavefunction yields a lower bound $P(x)\ge|\psi_{\mathrm{WKB}}(x)|^2$ on any tail, which the paper applies to DBI inflation, where the semiclassical saddle is valid only while $f(\phi)V(\phi)\le 2$.
  • In stochastic inflation, the stationary state of the Wigner function is a nonequilibrium steady state with irreversible currents; since $D_{pp}=0$, the housekeeping entropy production is infinite, and the density matrix of long-wavelength fields on fixed de Sitter breaks the KMS condition and detailed balance.
  • These KMS violations are not visible in equal-time field statistics, so the paper connects the de Sitter entropy problem to rare-event thermodynamics without contradicting standard stochastic-inflation correlation functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The large-deviation formula could be tested in a controlled platform: prepare an $N$-step quantum walk with a known step density matrix, measure the empirical step histogram many times, and compare the measured rate function to $D_s(\sigma_s\|\chi)$; current single-photon or trapped-ion quantum-walk experiments are natural places to look.
  • If momentum noise is generically generated by a more complete coarse-graining, the infinite housekeeping entropy would be a truncation artifact, and stochastic inflation in equilibrium would recover detailed balance; that would remove the claimed de Sitter KMS breakdown while leaving the quantum large-deviation results intact.
  • The same minimization principle suggests that primordial black hole abundances from inflation could be estimated by minimizing the sum of stochastic noise entropy and WKB initial-state cost, giving predictions in regimes where neither the Fokker-Planck expansion nor WKB alone is reliable.
  • Because the step density matrix $\chi$ encodes short-distance physics, the framework implies that measured tails of cosmological distributions are a probe of UV data; one could in principle invert tail measurements to constrain $\chi$ and hence the underlying field theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper develops a large-deviation framework for quantum walks based on the measurement-induced relative entropy, applies it to the anharmonic oscillator at finite temperature to exhibit a crossover between thermal (Gibbs) and quantum (WKB) tails, and then uses the framework to analyze stochastic inflation. The central formal statement, Eqs. (3.26)-(3.28), is that the probability of an empirical step distribution decays as exp(-N D_s(σ_s||χ)) and that the tail probability for the walker position is obtained by minimizing this relative entropy together with the initial-state contribution. The cosmological application claims that the density matrix of long-wavelength fields in fixed de Sitter space breaks KMS symmetry and does not satisfy detailed balance, leading to infinite housekeeping entropy.

Significance. The large-deviation core of the paper is internally consistent: the anharmonic oscillator instanton calculations in Section 2 are clean, the WKB/thermal crossover is clearly demonstrated, and the bound P(x) ≥ |ψ_WKB(x)|^2 from Eq. (3.29) is a useful and correct application of the minimization. The paper is honest in pointing out that the quantum walk reduces to a classical i.i.d. walk with step distribution χ(s,s), which limits the novelty of the 'quantum Sanov' statement. The cosmological KMS-breaking claim, if robust, would be significant for de Sitter quantum field theory, but it rests on a singular diffusion limit (D_pp=0); whether this is a faithful property of the model or an artifact of the coarse-graining scheme is the key open question. The paper provides machine-checkable analytic derivations for the walk models and gives concrete, falsifiable predictions for the form of rare-event probabilities, which are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4.3, Eqs. (4.27)-(4.32)] The claim that the stochastic-inflation density matrix breaks KMS symmetry and exhibits infinite housekeeping entropy is derived from the Wigner equation (4.27) with D_pp=0. Equation (4.32) contains a term J_irr,p^2/(D_pp W) with J_irr,p = -γ p W, which diverges when D_pp=0. The text labels this divergence 'formally' true and calls it an artifact, but the abstract and conclusions present KMS breaking and violation of detailed balance as properties of the de Sitter density matrix without this qualification. If a more complete exact-RG coarse-graining yields D_pp>0, possibly satisfying a fluctuation-dissipation relation, the stationary state may be KMS-symmetric and the housekeeping entropy finite. Please either prove that D_pp is exactly zero in a controlled limit of the model, provide a concrete estimate of the effect of a small D_pp on the KMS-breaking conclusion, or restate the cosmological claim as explicitly conditional on the singular D_pp=0 idealization.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.13)-(3.26)] The derivation in this section shows that the reduced dynamics of the quantum walk depend only on the diagonal elements χ(s,s) of the step density matrix, because the coupling in Eq. (3.13) is diagonal in the step basis and the trace over each step leaves only s=s'. Consequently, Eq. (3.26) is exactly the classical Sanov theorem for the distribution χ(s,s), and the measurement-induced relative entropy D_s(σ_s||χ) coincides with the classical KL divergence of the post-measurement distributions. The paper's framing as a 'quantum large deviation' framework is therefore not supported by the walk example; no example is given where off-diagonal coherences of χ affect the rate function. Please either provide such an example (e.g., a walk with non-commuting couplings or a step state with coherences that survive the trace) or revise the presentation to state clearly that the framework applies to the diagonal sector of the step density matrix.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the phrase 'provided a the mathematical foundation'; this should read 'provided a mathematical foundation'.
  2. [Sec. 2.4] The sentence 'there is no general obstacle to numeric calculations' is missing a word; it should read 'there is no general obstacle to numeric calculations' or 'there is no general obstacle to numerical calculations'.
  3. [Eq. (3.22)] The sign in the displayed equation is inconsistent with Eq. (3.23): it should be log P({n_k}) = -N D_{λ'}(σ∥χ), not +N D_{λ'}(σ∥χ), since P(σ) = exp(-N D_{λ'}(σ∥χ)).
  4. [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.5)] The minimization in Eq. (3.5) uses the variables λ and ν as Lagrange multipliers, but ν already denotes the true step distribution; renaming the multipliers (e.g., to ζ and ξ) would avoid confusion.
  5. [Appendix B.2, Eq. (B.5)] The term 'log m_ℓ/N log m_ℓ/N q_ℓ' is malformed; it should be '(m_ℓ/N) log[(m_ℓ/N)/q_ℓ]'.
  6. [Figure 1] The labels 'e□βV' and 'e□SWKB' contain stray square symbols; the intended expressions are presumably 'e^{-βV}' and 'e^{-S_WKB}'.
  7. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (4.1)] The notation 'log Ψ_tree[φ0] ⊃ ...' uses a set-inclusion symbol where an asymptotic equality or a phrase like 'contains terms of the form' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the large-deviation core is derived from i.i.d. step statistics, and the KMS claim is a conditional consequence of an imported but multiply supported model.

full rationale

The paper's central large-deviation result is self-contained. In Eqs. (3.13)-(3.15) the reduced density matrix is shown explicitly to depend only on the diagonal elements chi(s,s), reducing the quantum walk to a classical i.i.d. walk with nu(s)=chi(s,s); Eqs. (3.20)-(3.23) then obtain the empirical-distribution probability by direct multinomial counting, which is Sanov's theorem. The paper honestly notes that this 'is not a quantum mechanical expression' but exploits the classical nature of measurement in a single basis, so presenting the measurement-induced relative entropy as the rate function is a definitional identification, not a concealed input. The minimization in Eqs. (3.27)-(3.28) is the standard contraction principle, and Eq. (3.29) is a corollary under the stated zero-noise condition, not an independent prediction. The cosmological KMS/housekeeping conclusion in Sec. 4.3 is conditional: it uses the Wigner Fokker-Planck equation (4.26)-(4.27) with D_pp=0, imported from [65] and parallel works [63-69]. That is a model input rather than a circular redefinition; the paper even notes in Sec. 3.3 that adding momentum noise would make S_tot finite and in Sec. 4.3 that the calculation applies 'strictly speaking, only in fixed dS', which are robustness caveats, not evidence that a result was assumed. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim reduces by construction to a self-citation. Score 1 reflects the heavy reliance on the authors' prior [65] for the cosmological application without treating that dependence as circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. Its free-parameter count is zero because the model inputs (g, γ, m, λ, f, V) are taken from the physical setup, not fitted. The main assumptions are the Markovian i.i.d. walk, the fixed measurement basis, and the specific stochastic inflation model with no momentum noise.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Classical Sanov's theorem and Cramér's theorem provide the large deviation principle for i.i.d. random walks.
    Used in Section 3.1 to derive the large deviation rate function from relative entropy minimization.
  • domain assumption The quantum walk is Markovian and the steps are i.i.d. with a fixed density matrix χ per step.
    Section 2.1 defines the walk by coupling to a new bath state at each instant and tracing it out, which assumes no memory and identical step statistics.
  • domain assumption The walker's coupling to the environment picks a preferred basis, so only diagonal elements of the step density matrix matter.
    Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.14)-(3.15), shows the reduced density matrix depends only on χ(s,s), reducing the quantum problem to a classical one.
  • domain assumption The Wigner function evolution for stochastic inflation, Eq. (4.3), is correct as the open quantum system description of long-wavelength fields in de Sitter.
    Taken from the authors' previous work [65] and used as the starting point for the KMS analysis in Section 4.3.
  • ad hoc to paper The absence of momentum noise (D_pp = 0) in the Wigner evolution for stochastic inflation is a faithful property of the model.
    Section 4.3, Eq. (4.27), sets the momentum diffusion to zero, which is the source of the infinite housekeeping entropy and the KMS breakdown; no independent justification is given.
  • domain assumption The WKB or Euclidean saddle point approximation accurately describes the tail of the wavefunction and density matrix in the large-field regime.
    Used in Sections 2.3 and 4.2 to derive the exponential tails, assuming the Euclidean action is large and the semiclassical saddle dominates.
  • standard math The decomposition of the phase-space current into reversible and irreversible pieces correctly identifies the entropy production.
    Used in Section 4.3 after Eq. (4.29), based on stochastic thermodynamics literature [138].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Quantum Mechanics of Rare Events: From Quantum Walks to Stochastic Inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GIMC6AIS

@misc{pith2026260806319,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Quantum Mechanics of Rare Events: From Quantum Walks to Stochastic Inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GIMC6AIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06319}
}
read the original abstract

Rare fluctuations in physical systems depend on the detailed microphysics responsible for the fluctuations. In classical statistical systems, the large deviation principle has elucidated the role of semi-classics in describing this regime, and has simultaneously provided a the mathematical foundation of statistical mechanics. Large deviation theory for quantum system is considerably less developed. As all physical systems are fundamentally quantum mechanical, this leaves a major gap in our understanding of rare fluctuations relevant to statistical physics, cosmology, and more. In this paper, we develop the practical aspects of the theory of large deviations relevant for calculating rare events in physical systems from quantum walks to cosmology. We first analyze the case of the anharmonic oscillator coupled to a bath, showing explicitly how the system evolves from dominantly statistical (e.g. thermal) to quantum fluctuations. We then generalize these results, showing that the dominant rare fluctuations minimize the measurement-induced relative entropy. This perspective provides a thermodynamic description of a wide range of open quantum systems. We apply these results to random walks that arise in cosmology through stochastic inflation. We show that the evolution of the density matrix of long wavelength fields on a fixed de Sitter background breaks the KMS symmetry, giving rise to a stationary density matrix that does not respect detailed balance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06319 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the relative contributions of classical random (thermal, red) and quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Numerically computed action for the quantum thermal instanton for various values of x (points), compared to the thermal and quantum scalings, S ∝ x 4 and x 3 respectively. Right: The solutions for the instantons for different boundary conditions. Now, the claim is that for the density matrix, we have two possible saddles. First, we could just integrate from the same bounce x to x ′ , ρ1(x, x′ ) = exp −βϵ − Z x… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Numerically computed action for the quantum noise in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A three-site lattice sustaining a nonequilibrium steady state (NESS). (Left) Individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contributions to the wavefunction from (a) tree level and (b) loop-level Witten dia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, Jr., “The Theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system,”Annals Phys.24(1963) 118–173. 3

    1963

  2. [2]

    Derivation of the Schrodinger equation from Newtonian mechanics,

    E. Nelson, “Derivation of the Schrodinger equation from Newtonian mechanics,”Phys. Rev.150(1966) 1079–1085. 3

    1966

  3. [3]

    Supersymmetric Field Theories and Stochastic Differential Equations,

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, “Supersymmetric Field Theories and Stochastic Differential Equations,”Nucl. Phys. B206(1982) 321–332. 3

    1982

  4. [4]

    Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion,”Physica A121(1983) 587–616. 3

    1983

  5. [5]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,

    S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,”Phys. Rev. D 15(1977) 2929–2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]. 3

    1977

  6. [6]

    Wave Function of the Universe,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Wave Function of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 2960–2975. 3, 39

    1983

  7. [7]

    Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe,

    S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss, “Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe,”Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 35–38. 3

    1982

  8. [8]

    Creation of massive particles in a tunneling universe,

    J.-y. Hong, A. Vilenkin, and S. Winitzki, “Creation of massive particles in a tunneling universe,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 023521,arXiv:gr-qc/0305025. 3

    arXiv 2003

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Large Deviations in Fast-Slow Systems,

    F. Bouchet, T. Grafke, T. Tangarife, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “Large Deviations in Fast-Slow Systems,”Journal of Statistical Physics162no. 4, (Feb., 2016) 793–812, arXiv:1510.02227 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 3

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Thin-wall approximation in vacuum decay: A lemma,

    A. R. Brown, “Thin-wall approximation in vacuum decay: A lemma,”Phys. Rev. D97 no. 10, (2018) 105002,arXiv:1711.07712 [hep-th]. 3

    2018 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by selfsimilar gravitational condensation,

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter, “Formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by selfsimilar gravitational condensation,”Astrophys. J.187(1974) 425–438. 3

    1974

  4. [12]

    The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,

    J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, N. Kaiser, and A. S. Szalay, “The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,”Astrophys. J.304(1986) 15–61. 3

    1986

  5. [13]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168(1974) 399–415. 3

    1974

  6. [14]

    Primordial Black Holes,

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes,”arXiv:2502.15279 [astro-ph.CO]. 3, 32

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Exponentiation of multiparticle amplitudes in scalar theories,

    M. V. Libanov, V. A. Rubakov, D. T. Son, and S. V. Troitsky, “Exponentiation of multiparticle amplitudes in scalar theories,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7553–7569, arXiv:hep-ph/9407381. 3 55

    1994 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Semiclassical approach for multiparticle production in scalar theories,

    D. T. Son, “Semiclassical approach for multiparticle production in scalar theories,”Nucl. Phys. B477(1996) 378–406,arXiv:hep-ph/9505338. 3

    1996 arXiv

  9. [17]

    On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,

    S. Hellerman, D. Orlando, S. Reffert, and M. Watanabe, “On the CFT Operator Spectrum at Large Global Charge,”JHEP12(2015) 071,arXiv:1505.01537 [hep-th]. 3

    2015 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data,

    A. Monin, D. Pirtskhalava, R. Rattazzi, and F. K. Seibold, “Semiclassics, Goldstone Bosons and CFT data,”JHEP06(2017) 011,arXiv:1611.02912 [hep-th]. 3

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A Semiclassical limit of the gauge / string correspondence,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “A Semiclassical limit of the gauge / string correspondence,”Nucl. Phys. B636(2002) 99–114,arXiv:hep-th/0204051. 3

    2002 arXiv

  12. [20]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.93no. 3, (2021) 035002,arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]. 3

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    TF1 Snowmass Report: Quantum gravity, string theory, and black holes,

    D. Harlowet al., “TF1 Snowmass Report: Quantum gravity, string theory, and black holes,”arXiv:2210.01737 [hep-th]. 3

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Large deviations,

    S. R. S. Varadhan, “Large deviations,”The Annals of Probability36no. 2, (Mar., 2008) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-AOP348. 3, 20

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,

    H. Touchette, “The large deviation approach to statistical mechanics,”Phys. Rept.478 (6, 2009) 1–69. 3, 20

    2009

  16. [24]

    An introduction to large deviations with applications in physics,

    I. N. Burenev, D. W. H. Cloete, V. Kharbanda, and H. Touchette, “An introduction to large deviations with applications in physics,”arXiv e-prints(Mar., 2025) arXiv:2503.16015,arXiv:2503.16015 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 3, 20

    2025

  17. [25]

    Large deviations in the early Universe,

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and A. Premkumar, “Large deviations in the early Universe,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 8, (2023) 083501,arXiv:2212.02535 [hep-th]. 4, 6, 35

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    On large deviations from the invariant measure,

    J. G¨ artner, “On large deviations from the invariant measure,”Theory of Probability & Its Applications22no. 1, (1977) 24–39,https://doi.org/10.1137/1122003. https://doi.org/10.1137/1122003. 4, 20

    1977 doi

  19. [27]

    Large deviations for a general class of random vectors,

    R. S. Ellis, “Large deviations for a general class of random vectors,”The Annals of Probability12no. 1, (1984) 1–12.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2243592. 4, 20

    1984

  20. [28]

    Large Deviation Techniques Applied to Systems with Long-Range Interactions,

    J. Barr´ e, F. Bouchet, T. Dauxois, and S. Ruffo, “Large Deviation Techniques Applied to Systems with Long-Range Interactions,”Journal of Statistical Physics119no. 3-4, (May,

  21. [29]

    Instanton filtering for the stochastic Burgers equation,

    T. Grafke, R. Grauer, and T. Sch¨ afer, “Instanton filtering for the stochastic Burgers equation,”J. Phys. A46(2013) 062002,arXiv:1209.0905 [physics.flu-dyn]. 4

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    The instanton method and its numerical implementation in fluid mechanics,

    T. Grafke, R. Grauer, and T. Sch¨ afer, “The instanton method and its numerical implementation in fluid mechanics,”Journal of Physics A Mathematical General48 no. 33, (Aug., 2015) 333001,arXiv:1506.08745 [physics.flu-dyn]. 4 56

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    WKB theory of large deviations in stochastic populations,

    M. Assaf and B. Meerson, “WKB theory of large deviations in stochastic populations,” Journal of Physics A Mathematical General50no. 26, (June, 2017) 263001, arXiv:1612.01470 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 4

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Rogue waves and large deviations in deep sea,

    G. Dematteis, T. Grafke, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “Rogue waves and large deviations in deep sea,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Science115no. 5, (Jan., 2018) 855–860,arXiv:1704.01496 [physics.flu-dyn]. 4

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Computation of extreme heat waves in climate models using a large deviation algorithm,

    F. Ragone, J. Wouters, and F. Bouchet, “Computation of extreme heat waves in climate models using a large deviation algorithm,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Science115no. 1, (Jan., 2018) 24–29,arXiv:1709.03757 [physics.ao-ph]. 4

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Computation of Extreme Values of Time Averaged Observables in Climate Models with Large Deviation Techniques,

    F. Ragone and F. Bouchet, “Computation of Extreme Values of Time Averaged Observables in Climate Models with Large Deviation Techniques,”Journal of Statistical Physics179no. 5-6, (Nov., 2019) 1637–1665,arXiv:1907.05762 [physics.ao-ph]. 4

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Instantons for the destabilization of the inner Solar System,

    E. Woillez and F. Bouchet, “Instantons for the destabilization of the inner Solar System,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125no. 2, (2020) 021101,arXiv:1910.04005 [nlin.CD]. 4

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Experimental Evidence of Hydrodynamic Instantons: The Universal Route to Rogue Waves,

    G. Dematteis, T. Grafke, M. Onorato, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, “Experimental Evidence of Hydrodynamic Instantons: The Universal Route to Rogue Waves,”Physical Review X 9no. 4, (Oct., 2019) 041057,arXiv:1907.01320 [physics.flu-dyn]. 4

    2019 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Applications of large deviation theory in geophysical fluid dynamics and climate science,

    V. M. G´ alfi, V. Lucarini, F. Ragone, and J. Wouters, “Applications of large deviation theory in geophysical fluid dynamics and climate science,”Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie 44no. 6, (June, 2021) 291–363,arXiv:2106.13546 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 4

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Dynamical large deviations and long-range correlations for local weak wave turbulence,

    B. Douet and F. Bouchet, “Dynamical large deviations and long-range correlations for local weak wave turbulence,”arXiv e-prints(June, 2026) arXiv:2606.12624, arXiv:2606.12624 [physics.flu-dyn]. 4

    2026 arXiv

  31. [39]

    On the probability of large deviations of random magnitudes,

    I. N. Sanov, “On the probability of large deviations of random magnitudes,”Mat. Sb. N. S.42(1957) 11–44. In Russian. Translated as “On the Probability of Large Deviations of Random Variables,” Select. Transl. Math. Stat. and Prob. 1, 213–244, American Mathematical Society, 1961. 4

    1957

  32. [40]

    Two quantum analogues of Fisher information from a large deviation viewpoint of quantum estimation,

    M. Hayashi, “Two quantum analogues of Fisher information from a large deviation viewpoint of quantum estimation,”arXiv:quant-ph/0202003. 5

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Large deviation analysis for quantum security via smoothing of Renyi entropy of order 2,

    M. Hayashi, “Large deviation analysis for quantum security via smoothing of Renyi entropy of order 2,”IEEE Trans. Info. Theor.60(2014) 6702–6732,arXiv:1202.0322 [quant-ph]. 5

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Large-deviation statistics of a diffusive quantum spin chain and the additivity principle,

    M. Znidaric, “Large-deviation statistics of a diffusive quantum spin chain and the additivity principle,”Phys. Rev. E89(2014) 042140,arXiv:1401.7341 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5 57

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Exact large-deviation statistics for a nonequilibrium quantum spin chain,

    M. Znidaric, “Exact large-deviation statistics for a nonequilibrium quantum spin chain,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 040602,arXiv:1310.3670 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5

    2014 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Stochastic Quantum Zeno by Large Deviation Theory,

    S. Gherardini, S. Gupta, F. S. Cataliotti, A. Smerzi, F. Caruso, and S. Ruffo, “Stochastic Quantum Zeno by Large Deviation Theory,”New J. Phys.18(2016) 013048, arXiv:1509.08122 [quant-ph]. 5

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Central Limit Theorem and Large Deviation Principle for Continuous Time Open Quantum Walks,

    H. Bringuier, “Central Limit Theorem and Large Deviation Principle for Continuous Time Open Quantum Walks,”arXiv:1610.01298 [math-ph]. 5

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Unraveling the Large Deviation Statistics of Markovian Open Quantum Systems,

    F. Carollo, R. L. Jack, and J. P. Garrahan, “Unraveling the Large Deviation Statistics of Markovian Open Quantum Systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122no. 13, (2019) 130605, arXiv:1811.04969 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Exact nonequilibrium quantum observable statistics: A large-deviation approach,

    S. Gherardini, “Exact nonequilibrium quantum observable statistics: A large-deviation approach,”Phys. Rev. A99(2019) 062105,arXiv:1901.11293 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Efficiency large deviation function of quantum heat engines,

    T. Denzler and E. Lutz, “Efficiency large deviation function of quantum heat engines,” New J. Phys.23no. 7, (2021) 075003,arXiv:2008.00778 [quant-ph]. 5

    2021 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Large Deviation Full Counting Statistics in Adiabatic Open Quantum Dynamics,

    P. J. Paulino, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Carollo, “Large Deviation Full Counting Statistics in Adiabatic Open Quantum Dynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 26, (2024) 260402, arXiv:2401.11933 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Quantum Schr¨ odinger bridges: Large deviations and time-symmetric ensembles,

    O. M. Miangolarra, R. Sabbagh, and T. T. Georgiou, “Quantum Schr¨ odinger bridges: Large deviations and time-symmetric ensembles,”Phys. Rev. A112no. 1, (2025) 012202, arXiv:2503.05886 [quant-ph]. 5

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Universal classical and quantum fluctuations in the large deviations of current of noisy quantum systems: The case of QSSEP and QSSIP,

    M. Albert, D. Bernard, T. Jin, S. Scopa, and S. Wei, “Universal classical and quantum fluctuations in the large deviations of current of noisy quantum systems: The case of QSSEP and QSSIP,”arXiv:2601.16883 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5

  44. [52]

    Large deviations in quantum dynamics and complexity,

    X. Cao and J. Kurchan, “Large deviations in quantum dynamics and complexity,” arXiv:2607.20959 [quant-ph]. 5

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Quantum state estimation and large deviations,

    M. Keyl, “Quantum state estimation and large deviations,”Rev. Math. Phys.18(2006) 19–60,arXiv:quant-ph/0412053. 5

    2006 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A quantum version of Sanov’s theorem,

    I. Bjelakovic, J. D. Deuschel, T. Krueger, R. Seiler, R. Siegmund-Schultze, and A. Szkola, “A quantum version of Sanov’s theorem,”arXiv:quant-ph/0412157. 5

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sanov and Central Limit Theorems for output statistics of quantum Markov chains,

    M. van Horssen and M. Guta, “Sanov and Central Limit Theorems for output statistics of quantum Markov chains,”arXiv:1407.5082 [quant-ph]. 5

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Large deviations at level 2.5 for Markovian open quantum systems: quantum jumps and quantum state diffusion,

    F. Carollo, J. P. Garrahan, and R. L. Jack, “Large deviations at level 2.5 for Markovian open quantum systems: quantum jumps and quantum state diffusion,”J. Statist. Phys. 184(2021) 13,arXiv:2101.04138 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 5 58

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Another quantum version of Sanov theorem,

    M. Hayashi, “Another quantum version of Sanov theorem,”arXiv:2407.18566 [quant-ph]. 5

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Generalised quantum Sanov theorem revisited,

    L. Lami, “Generalised quantum Sanov theorem revisited,”arXiv:2510.06340 [quant-ph]. 5

  51. [59]

    Quantum walks: a comprehensive review,

    S. E. Venegas-Andraca, “Quantum walks: a comprehensive review,”Quant. Inf. Proc.11 no. 5, (2012) 1015–1106,arXiv:1201.4780 [quant-ph]. 5

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    QUANTUM FIELD TRANSITION RATES AT FINITE TEMPERATURES,

    R. J. Noble, “QUANTUM FIELD TRANSITION RATES AT FINITE TEMPERATURES,”Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 3179. 5

    1979

  53. [61]

    Quantum Statistical Metastability,

    I. Affleck, “Quantum Statistical Metastability,”Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 388. 5

    1981

  54. [62]

    Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, “Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative particle physics to gravitational waves,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.135 (2024) 104094,arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]. 5

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Quantum to classical transition of density fluctuations in the inflationary model,

    Y. Nambu, “Quantum to classical transition of density fluctuations in the inflationary model,”Phys. Lett. B276(1992) 11–17. 6, 7, 39, 41

    1992

  56. [64]

    Stochastic Inflation as an Open Quantum System,

    Y.-Z. Li, “Stochastic Inflation as an Open Quantum System,”Phys. Rev. Lett.136no. 7, (2026) 071501,arXiv:2507.02070 [hep-th]. 6, 7, 34, 39, 41

    2026 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Quantum Walks and Exact RG in de Sitter Space,

    D. Green and K. Gupta, “Quantum Walks and Exact RG in de Sitter Space,” arXiv:2512.13842 [hep-th]. 6, 7, 8, 16, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41

  58. [66]

    Stochastic instantons and the tail of the inflationary density perturbation,

    J. Calder´ on-Figueroa and D. Seery, “Stochastic instantons and the tail of the inflationary density perturbation,”arXiv:2510.04707 [astro-ph.CO]. 6, 7, 39, 41

  59. [67]

    Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group,

    S. C´ espedes and T. Colas, “Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group,”arXiv:2605.11096 [hep-th]. 6, 7, 39, 41

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,

    Y.-Z. Li, “Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system II: open effective field theory and stochastic matching,”arXiv:2605.21929 [hep-th]. 6, 7, 39, 41

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Quantum Stochastic Inflation,

    R. Christie, J. Joo, G. Kaplanek, V. Vennin, and D. Wands, “Quantum Stochastic Inflation,”arXiv:2606.12636 [hep-th]. 6, 7, 39, 41

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    The Birth of Inflationary Universes,

    A. Vilenkin, “The Birth of Inflationary Universes,”Phys. Rev. D27(1983) 2848. 6, 39

    1983

  63. [71]

    STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,”Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107–126. 6, 39

    1986

  64. [72]

    Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357–6368, arXiv:astro-ph/9407016. 6, 39, 42

    1994 arXiv

  65. [73]

    A tail of eternal inflation,

    T. Cohen, D. Green, and A. Premkumar, “A tail of eternal inflation,”SciPost Phys.14 no. 5, (2023) 109,arXiv:2111.09332 [hep-th]. 6, 35, 39 59

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,

    R. Kubo, “Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,”J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12(1957) 570–586. 6

    1957

  67. [75]

    Theory of many particle systems. 1.,

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger, “Theory of many particle systems. 1.,”Phys. Rev.115 (1959) 1342–1373. 6

    1959

  68. [76]

    On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,

    R. Haag, N. M. Hugenholtz, and M. Winnink, “On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,”Commun. Math. Phys.5(1967) 215–236. 6

    1967

  69. [77]

    Out-of-time-ordered Correlators in de Sitter Revisited,

    A. Milekhin, V. Narovlansky, and J. Xu, “Out-of-time-ordered Correlators in de Sitter Revisited,”arXiv:2607.13137 [hep-th]. 6, 42

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    A de Sitter Anti-Scrambling Algebra,

    W. Cui and D. K. Kolchmeyer, “A de Sitter Anti-Scrambling Algebra,” arXiv:2607.13665 [hep-th]. 6, 42

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Negative shocks versus static patch holography,

    Y. Chen, D. Stanford, H. Tang, and Z. Yang, “Negative shocks versus static patch holography,”arXiv:2607.14042 [hep-th]. 6, 42

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    Anti-scrambling and euclidean folds from observer correlators in de Sitter space,

    D. Harlow and Y. Zhao, “Anti-scrambling and euclidean folds from observer correlators in de Sitter space,”arXiv:2607.14215 [hep-th]. 6, 42

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.46(1981) 211. 7

    1981

  74. [82]

    Quantum Brownian motion: The Functional inegral approach,

    H. Grabert, P. Schramm, and G. L. Ingold, “Quantum Brownian motion: The Functional inegral approach,”Phys. Rept.168(1988) 115–207. 7

    1988

  75. [83]

    Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: 1. Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise,

    B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz, and Y.-h. Zhang, “Quantum Brownian motion in a general environment: 1. Exact master equation with nonlocal dissipation and colored noise,” Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2843–2861. 7

    1992

  76. [84]

    Keldysh Field Theory for Driven Open Quantum Systems,

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, “Keldysh Field Theory for Driven Open Quantum Systems,”Rept. Prog. Phys.79no. 9, (2016) 096001,arXiv:1512.00637 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. 9, 11

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace,

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “Schwinger-Keldysh formalism. Part I: BRST symmetries and superspace,”JHEP06(2017) 069,arXiv:1610.01940 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    2017 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system,

    M. Hongo, S. Kim, T. Noumi, and A. Ota, “Effective field theory of time-translational symmetry breaking in nonequilibrium open system,”JHEP02(2019) 131, arXiv:1805.06240 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, “Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,”PoST ASI2017(2018) 008,arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]. 9, 11 60

    2018 arXiv

  80. [88]

    The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,

    C. O. Akyuz, G. Goon, and R. Penco, “The Schwinger-Keldysh coset construction,” JHEP06(2024) 004,arXiv:2306.17232 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Lectures on Open Effective Field Theories,

    T. Colas, “Lectures on Open Effective Field Theories,” 9, 2025.arXiv:2510.00140 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    2025

  82. [90]

    Schwinger-Keldysh Path Integral for Gauge theories,

    G. Kaplanek, M. Mylova, and A. J. Tolley, “Schwinger-Keldysh Path Integral for Gauge theories,”arXiv:2604.26941 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    arXiv

  83. [91]

    Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology,

    E. Pajer, “Lectures on Open Systems and Cosmology,”arXiv:2607.14351 [hep-th]. 9, 11

    arXiv

  84. [92]

    Statistical dynamics of classical systems,

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, “Statistical dynamics of classical systems,” Phys. Rev. A8(Jul, 1973) 423–437. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.8.423. 11

    1973 doi

  85. [93]

    Gibbs vs boltzmann entropies,

    E. T. Jaynes, “Gibbs vs boltzmann entropies,”American Journal of Physics33no. 5, (05, 1965) 391–398, https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article-pdf/33/5/391/12040108/391 1 online.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1971557. 19

    1965 doi

  86. [94]

    E. Schr¨ odinger’s 1931 paper “on the reversal of the laws of nature

    R. Chetrite, P. Muratore-Ginanneschi, and K. Schwieger, “E. Schr¨ odinger’s 1931 paper “on the reversal of the laws of nature” [“¨ uber die umkehrung der naturgesetze”, sitzungsberichte der preussischen akademie der wissenschaften, physikalisch-mathematische klasse, 8 n9 144–1...

    1931 doi

  87. [95]

    Sur un nouveau th´ eor` eme-limite de la th´ eorie des probabilit´ es

    H. Cram´ er, “Sur un nouveau th´ eor` eme-limite de la th´ eorie des probabilit´ es..” Actual. sci. industr. 736, 5-23. (Conf´ er. internat. Sci. math. Univ. Gen` eve. Th´ eorie des probabilit´ es. III: Les sommes et les fonctions de variables al´ eatoires.) (1938)., 1938. 20

    1938

  88. [96]

    On variational expressions for quantum relative entropies,

    M. Berta, O. Fawzi, and M. Tomamichel, “On variational expressions for quantum relative entropies,”Lett. Math. Phys.107no. 12, (2017) 2239–2265,arXiv:1512.02615 [quant-ph]. 23

    2017 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Entropy Production along a Stochastic Trajectory and an Integral Fluctuation Theorem,

    U. Seifert, “Entropy Production along a Stochastic Trajectory and an Integral Fluctuation Theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95no. 4, (2005) 040602. 25

    2005

  90. [98]

    Asymptotic evaluation of certain markov process expectations for large time. iv,

    M. D. Donsker and S. R. S. Varadhan, “Asymptotic evaluation of certain markov process expectations for large time. iv,”Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics36 no. 2, (1983) 183–212, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.3160360204. https://onlinelibrary....

    1983 doi

  91. [99]

    Dissipation and lag in irreversible processes,

    S. Vaikuntanathan and C. Jarzynski, “Dissipation and lag in irreversible processes,” Europhysics Letters87no. 6, (Oct, 2009) 60005. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/87/60005. 26 61

    2009 doi

  92. [100]

    Generative diffusion from an action principle,

    A. Premkumar, “Generative diffusion from an action principle,” 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04490. 26

    2023 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Steady state thermodynamics,

    Y. Oono and M. Paniconi, “Steady state thermodynamics,”Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplementno. 130, (1998) 29–44. 27, 50

    1998

  94. [102]

    Steady-state thermodynamics of langevin systems,

    T. Hatano and S.-i. Sasa, “Steady-state thermodynamics of langevin systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.86(Apr, 2001) 3463–3466. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3463. 27, 50, 52

    2001 doi

  95. [103]

    Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines,

    U. Seifert, “Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines,” Rept. Prog. Phys.75no. 12, (2012) 126001. 28, 40

    2012

  96. [104]

    Entropy production along nonequilibrium quantum jump trajectories,

    J. M. Horowitz and J. M. R. Parrondo, “Entropy production along nonequilibrium quantum jump trajectories,”New J. Phys.15no. 8, (2013) 085028,arXiv:1305.6793 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 30, 31

    2013 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Nonequilibrium potential and fluctuation theorems for quantum maps,

    G. Manzano, J. M. Horowitz, and J. M. R. Parrondo, “Nonequilibrium potential and fluctuation theorems for quantum maps,”Phys. Rev. E92(2015) 032129, arXiv:1505.04201 [quant-ph]. 30, 31

    2015 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Signals of a Quantum Universe,

    D. Green and R. A. Porto, “Signals of a Quantum Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124no. 25, (2020) 251302,arXiv:2001.09149 [hep-th]. 32

    2020 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Eternally Existing Selfreproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,

    A. D. Linde, “Eternally Existing Selfreproducing Chaotic Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B175(1986) 395–400. 32

    1986

  100. [108]

    The Global Structure of the Inflationary Universe,

    A. S. Goncharov, A. D. Linde, and V. F. Mukhanov, “The Global Structure of the Inflationary Universe,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2(1987) 561–591. 32

    1987

  101. [109]

    A Measure of de Sitter entropy and eternal inflation,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, E. Trincherini, and G. Villadoro, “A Measure of de Sitter entropy and eternal inflation,”JHEP05(2007) 055,arXiv:0704.1814 [hep-th]. 33, 39

    2007 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,”Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2738–2751. 33, 39, 42

    1977

  103. [111]

    Beyond perturbation theory in inflation,

    M. Celoria, P. Creminelli, G. Tambalo, and V. Yingcharoenrat, “Beyond perturbation theory in inflation,”JCAP06(2021) 051,arXiv:2103.09244 [hep-th]. 33, 34

    2021 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Multiparticle amplitudes at zero energy and momentum in scalar theory,

    M. B. Voloshin, “Multiparticle amplitudes at zero energy and momentum in scalar theory,”Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 233–248. 33

    1992

  105. [113]

    EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato, and M. Williams, “EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,”JHEP03 (2015) 090,arXiv:1408.5002 [hep-th]. 34, 39 62

    2015 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Open EFTs, IR effects\& late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and G. Tasinato, “Open EFTs, IR effects\& late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,”JHEP01(2016) 153, arXiv:1512.00169 [gr-qc]. 34, 39

    2016 arXiv

  107. [115]

    O(N) model in Euclidean de Sitter space: beyond the leading infrared approximation,

    D. L´ opez Nacir, F. D. Mazzitelli, and L. G. Trombetta, “O(N) model in Euclidean de Sitter space: beyond the leading infrared approximation,”JHEP09(2016) 117, arXiv:1606.03481 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2016 arXiv

  108. [116]

    λϕ 4 in dS,

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore, “λϕ 4 in dS,”arXiv:1911.00022 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    1911 arXiv

  109. [117]

    De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time,

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, “De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time,” JHEP07(2020) 119,arXiv:1912.09502 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2020 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,

    M. Mirbabayi, “Infrared dynamics of a light scalar field in de Sitter,”JCAP12(2020) 006,arXiv:1911.00564 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2020 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,

    T. Cohen and D. Green, “Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,”JHEP12(2020) 041, arXiv:2007.03693 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2020 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,

    M. Mirbabayi, “Markovian dynamics in de Sitter,”JCAP09(2021) 038, arXiv:2010.06604 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2021 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Manifestly Causal In-In Perturbation Theory about the Interacting Vacuum,

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, “Manifestly Causal In-In Perturbation Theory about the Interacting Vacuum,”JHEP03(2021) 080,arXiv:2010.10785 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2021 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Revisiting stochastic inflation with perturbation theory,

    G. A. Palma and S. Sypsas, “Revisiting stochastic inflation with perturbation theory,” arXiv:2311.17644 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    arXiv

  115. [123]

    Cosmological correlators in massless ϕ4-theory and the method of regions,

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and A. F. Sanfilippo, “Cosmological correlators in massless ϕ4-theory and the method of regions,”JHEP04(2024) 006,arXiv:2312.06766 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    2024 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism,

    G. A. Palma, S. Sypsas, and D. Tapia, “Confronting infrared divergences in de Sitter: loops, logarithms and the stochastic formalism,”arXiv:2507.21310 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Renormalisation and matching of massless scalar correlation functions in Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and A. F. Sanfilippo, “Renormalisation and matching of massless scalar correlation functions in Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,”arXiv:2603.09438 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    arXiv

  118. [126]

    Quantum correction to the diffusion term in stochastic inflation from composite-operator matching in Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and A. F. Sanfilippo, “Quantum correction to the diffusion term in stochastic inflation from composite-operator matching in Soft de Sitter Effective Theory,” arXiv:2604.14283 [hep-th]. 34, 39

    arXiv

  119. [127]

    Stochastic Inflation at NNLO,

    T. Cohen, D. Green, A. Premkumar, and A. Ridgway, “Stochastic Inflation at NNLO,” JHEP09(2021) 159,arXiv:2106.09728 [hep-th]. 35

    2021 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Scalar speed limits and cosmology: Acceleration from D-cceleration,

    E. Silverstein and D. Tong, “Scalar speed limits and cosmology: Acceleration from D-cceleration,”Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 103505,arXiv:hep-th/0310221. 37 63

    2004 arXiv

  121. [129]

    A Microscopic Limit on Gravitational Waves from D-brane Inflation,

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, “A Microscopic Limit on Gravitational Waves from D-brane Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 123508,arXiv:hep-th/0610285. 37

    2007 arXiv

  122. [130]

    A Wrinkle in Coleman-De Luccia,

    A. R. Brown, S. Sarangi, B. Shlaer, and A. Weltman, “A Wrinkle in Coleman-De Luccia,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 161601,arXiv:0706.0485 [hep-th]. 38

    2007 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Rapid Tunneling and Percolation in the Landscape,

    S. Sarangi, G. Shiu, and B. Shlaer, “Rapid Tunneling and Percolation in the Landscape,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 741–788,arXiv:0708.4375 [hep-th]. 38

    2009 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation,

    J. D. Brown and C. Teitelboim, “Neutralization of the Cosmological Constant by Membrane Creation,”Nucl. Phys. B297(1988) 787–836. 38

    1988

  125. [133]

    Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier,

    R. Flauger, V. Gorbenko, A. Joyce, L. McAllister, G. Shiu, and E. Silverstein, “Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier,” inSnowmass 2021. 3, 2022. arXiv:2203.07629 [hep-th]. 39

    2021 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation,

    J. Maldacena, “Comments on the no boundary wavefunction and slow roll inflation,” arXiv:2403.10510 [hep-th]. 39

    arXiv

  127. [135]

    Density Matrix of the Universe,

    D. N. Page, “Density Matrix of the Universe,”Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 2267. 39

    1986

  128. [136]

    The Density Matrix of the Universe,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Density Matrix of the Universe,”Phys. Scripta T15(1987) 151. 39

    1987

  129. [137]

    The no boundary density matrix,

    V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li, and J. Maldacena, “The no boundary density matrix,”JHEP02(2025) 124,arXiv:2409.14218 [hep-th]. 39

    2025 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Entropy production in full phase space for continuous stochastic dynamics,

    R. E. Spinney and I. J. Ford, “Entropy production in full phase space for continuous stochastic dynamics,”Physical Review E85no. 5, (May, 2012) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.051113. 40

    2012 doi

  131. [139]

    Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger, and A. Volovich, “Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space,” inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings, pp. 423–453. 10, 2001. arXiv:hep-th/0110007. 41

    2001 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Two point functions and quantum fields in de Sitter universe,

    J. Bros and U. Moschella, “Two point functions and quantum fields in de Sitter universe,” Rev. Math. Phys.8(1996) 327–392,arXiv:gr-qc/9511019. 41

    1996 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Quantum fields in the static de Sitter universe,

    E. T. Akhmedov, K. V. Bazarov, D. V. Diakonov, and U. Moschella, “Quantum fields in the static de Sitter universe,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 8, (2020) 085003,arXiv:2005.13952 [hep-th]. 41

    2020 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,

    B. Allen, “Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,”Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 3136. 42

    1985

  135. [143]

    An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington, and E. Witten, “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,”JHEP02(2023) 082,arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]. 42

    2023 arXiv

  136. [144]

    A Covariant entropy conjecture,

    R. Bousso, “A Covariant entropy conjecture,”JHEP07(1999) 004, arXiv:hep-th/9905177. 42 64

    1999 arXiv

  137. [145]

    A quantum-mechanical central limit theorem,

    C. D. Cushen and R. L. Hudson, “A quantum-mechanical central limit theorem,”Journal of Applied Probability8no. 3, (1971) 454–469. 42

    1971

  138. [146]

    Nonequilibrium Measurements of Free Energy Differences for Microscopically Reversible Markovian Systems,

    G. E. Crooks, “Nonequilibrium Measurements of Free Energy Differences for Microscopically Reversible Markovian Systems,”Journal of Statistical Physics90no. 5, (Mar, 1998) 1481–1487.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023208217925. 50 65

    1998 doi

  139. [2005]

    677–713,arXiv:cond-mat/0406358 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 4

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.