Pith. sign in

REVIEW 138 references

A Symplectic Theory of Turbulence Closure: Hidden Reservoir Dynamics, Endogenous Stochastic Transport, and Kraichnan Dual Cascades

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2608.06606 v1 pith:ZQL66BST submitted 2026-08-06 physics.flu-dyn math-phmath.MP

classification physics.flu-dynmath-phmath.MP
keywords eulerianreservoirsymplectictheorygeometrichamiltonianstochasticcascades
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Subgrid-scale parameterization of 2D turbulence must preserve the geometry enabling the dual cascade. Classical and data-driven closures often lack the symmetries required for online stability. We introduce the Symplectic Geometric Closure (SGC), derived from a geometric reduction of Multilayer Stochastic Models. Its core is a hidden reservoir of unresolved symplectic degrees of freedom feeding back on the resolved flow through a constrained Hamiltonian exchange. Stability is enforced geometrically. The interaction is generated by a symplectic functional $\mathcal{G}$ that preserves augmented enstrophy, yielding pullback boundedness for the Navier--Stokes--$\beta$ core and a compact random pullback attractor in the hyperviscous realization. The same generator produces an emergent Hamiltonian subgrid velocity whose forcing is exactly the Lie transport of resolved vorticity. Unresolved stochastic activity thus renormalizes the advecting geometry while maintaining the Hamiltonian structure of incompressible 2D motion. Eliminating the reservoir yields a finite-memory Eulerian theory. At one-loop line-renormalized order, reservoir contractions reproduce the operator architecture of Kraichnan-type Direct-Interaction Approximation theory. Crucially, the nested Jacobian vertex is compatible with Random Galilean transformations and imposes an intrinsic fourth-order infrared suppression, $\mathcal{O}(p^4)$, of uniform sweeping modes within the Eulerian interaction. With decorrelation controlled by strain-induced deformation rather than sweeping, the dressed Eulerian transfer theory self-consistently admits the classical $k^{-5/3}$ inverse-energy and $k^{-3}$ forward-enstrophy cascades. SGC thus provides an Eulerian geometric realization of Kraichnan's program and a principled foundation for geometrically constrained, stability-preserving data-driven closures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence, The Physics of Fluids10, 1417 (1967)

  2. [2]

    G.K.Batchelor,Computationoftheenergyspectruminhomogeneous two-dimensional turbulence, Physics of Fluids Supplement II12, 233 (1969)

  3. [3]

    P. B. Rhines, Waves and turbulence on a beta-plane, Journal of Fluid Mechanics69, 417 (1975)

  4. [4]

    Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive 56 equations: I

    J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive 56 equations: I. The basic experiment, Monthly Weather Review91, 99 (1963)

  5. [5]

    C. E. Leith, Diffusion approximation for two-dimensional turbulence, Physics of Fluids11, 671 (1968)

  6. [7]

    Vreman, B

    B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer, Journal of Fluid Mechanics339, 357 (1997)

  7. [8]

    Jakhar, Y

    K. Jakhar, Y. Guan, R. Mojgani, A. Chattopadhyay, and P. Hassan- zadeh,Learningclosed-formequationsforsubgrid-scaleclosuresfrom high-fidelity data: Promises and challenges, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems16, e2023MS003872 (2024)

  8. [9]

    N. D. Brenowitz and C. S. Bretherton, Spatially extended tests of a neuralnetworkparameterizationtrainedbycoarse-graining,Journalof Advances in Modeling Earth Systems11, 2728 (2019)

Show all 138 references
  1. [10]

    N. D. Brenowitz, T. Beucler, M. Pritchard, and C. S. Bretherton, Inter- preting and stabilizing machine-learning parameterizations of convec- tion, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences77, 4357 (2020)

  2. [11]

    N. D. Brenowitz, B. Henn, J. McGibbon, S. K. Clark, A. Kwa, W. A. Perkins,O.Watt-Meyer,andC.S.Bretherton,Machinelearningclimate model dynamics: Offline versus online performance, inNeurIPS 2020 WorkshoponTacklingClimateChangewithMachineLearning(2020)

  3. [12]

    Y.Zhou,Turbulencetheoriesandstatisticalclosureapproaches,Physics Reports935, 1 (2021)

  4. [13]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Lagrangian-history closure approximation for turbu- lence, The Physics of Fluids8, 575 (1965)

  5. [14]

    R. H. Kraichnan, An almost-Markovian Galilean-invariant turbulence model, Journal of Fluid Mechanics47, 513 (1971)

  6. [15]

    G.DaPrato,AnIntroductiontoInfinite-DimensionalAnalysis(Springer Science & Business Media, 2006)

  7. [16]

    M.Gurari,XXXVI.Selfenergyofslowelectronsinpolarmaterials,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science44, 329 (1953)

  8. [17]

    R. P. Feynman, Slow electrons in a polar crystal, Physical Review97, 660 (1955)

  9. [18]

    J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov, Fröhlich polaron and bipolaron: recentdevelopments,ReportsonProgressinPhysics72,066501(2009)

  10. [19]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory(Westview Press, 1995)

  11. [20]

    (Oxford University Press, 2002)

    J.Zinn-Justin,QuantumFieldTheoryandCriticalPhenomena,4thed. (Oxford University Press, 2002)

  12. [21]

    U. C. Täuber,Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equi- libriumandNon-EquilibriumScalingBehavior(CambridgeUniversity Press, 2014)

  13. [22]

    16 (1966) pp

    V.Arnold,SurlagéométriedifférentielledesgroupesdeLiededimen- sioninfinieetsesapplicationsàl’hydrodynamiquedesfluidesparfaits, inAnnales de l’institut Fourier, Vol. 16 (1966) pp. 319–361

  14. [23]

    D.G.EbinandJ.Marsden,Groupsofdiffeomorphismsandthemotion of an incompressible fluid, Annals of Mathematics92, 102 (1970)

  15. [24]

    V.I.ArnoldandB.A.Khesin,TopologicalMethodsinHydrodynamics (Springer, 1998)

  16. [25]

    D.G.AndrewsandM.E.McIntyre,Anexacttheoryofnonlinearwaves onaLagrangian-meanflow,JournalofFluidMechanics89,609(1978)

  17. [26]

    P.R.GentandJ.C.McWilliams,Isopycnalmixinginoceancirculation models, Journal of Physical Oceanography20, 150 (1990)

  18. [27]

    D. D. Holm, Variational principles for stochastic fluid dynamics, Pro- ceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyA:Mathematical,PhysicalandEngineer- ing Sciences471(2015)

  19. [28]

    Resseguier, E

    V. Resseguier, E. Mémin, and B. Chapron, Geophysical flows under locationuncertainty,PartIRandomtransportandgeneralmodels,Geo- physical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics111, 149 (2017)

  20. [29]

    Resseguier, E

    V. Resseguier, E. Mémin, and B. Chapron, Geophysical flows under location uncertainty, Part II Quasi-geostrophy and efficient ensem- ble spreading, Geophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics111, 177 (2017)

  21. [30]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum me- chanics, Reviews of Modern Physics20, 367 (1948)

  22. [31]

    R. P. Feynman, Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics, Physical Review76, 769 (1949)

  23. [32]

    Forster, D

    D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, Large-distance and long- time properties of a randomly stirred fluid, Physical Review A16, 732 (1977)

  24. [33]

    Yakhot and S

    V. Yakhot and S. A. Orszag, Renormalization group analysis of turbu- lence. I. Basic theory, Journal of Scientific Computing1, 3 (1986)

  25. [34]

    H. W. Wyld Jr, Formulation of the theory of isotropic turbulence in an incompressible fluid, Annals of Physics14, 143 (1961)

  26. [35]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Physical Review A8, 423 (1973)

  27. [36]

    R. H. Kraichnan, The structure of isotropic turbulence at very high Reynolds numbers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics5, 497 (1959)

  28. [37]

    R.H.Kraichnan,Dynamicsofnonlinearstochasticsystems,Journalof Mathematical Physics2, 124 (1961)

  29. [38]

    C.DeDominicisandP.C.Martin,Energyspectraofcertainrandomly- stirred fluids, Physical Review A19, 419 (1979)

  30. [40]

    Berera, M

    A. Berera, M. Salewski, and W. D. McComb, Eulerian field-theoretic closureformalismsforfluidturbulence,PhysicalReviewE87,013007 (2013)

  31. [41]

    H.Mori,Transport,CollectiveMotion,andBrownianMotion,Progress of Theoretical Physics33, 423 (1965)

  32. [42]

    Zwanzig, Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics, Physical Review124, 983 (1961)

    R. Zwanzig, Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics, Physical Review124, 983 (1961)

  33. [43]

    A. J. Chorin, O. H. Hald, and R. Kupferman, Optimal prediction with memory, Physica D166, 239 (2002)

  34. [44]

    Chorin and O

    A. Chorin and O. Hald,Stochastic Tools in Mathematics and Science, Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences No. 147 (Springer New York, 2006)

  35. [45]

    Lucarini and M

    V. Lucarini and M. D. Chekroun, Theoretical tools for under- standing the climate crisis from Hasselmann’s programme and be- yond, Nature Reviews Physics 10.1038/s42254-023-00650-8 (2023), doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00650-8

  36. [46]

    Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables, Biometrika12, 134 (1918)

    L. Isserlis, On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables, Biometrika12, 134 (1918)

  37. [47]

    129 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    S.Janson,GaussianHilbertSpaces,CambridgeTractsinMathematics, Vol. 129 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

  38. [48]

    Peccati and M

    G. Peccati and M. S. Taqqu,Wiener Chaos: Moments, Cumulants and Diagrams, Bocconi & Springer Series, Vol. 1 (Springer, Milan, 2011)

  39. [49]

    Nakano, A theory of homogeneous, isotropic turbulence of incom- pressible fluids, Annals of Physics73, 326 (1972)

    T. Nakano, A theory of homogeneous, isotropic turbulence of incom- pressible fluids, Annals of Physics73, 326 (1972)

  40. [50]

    G.DaPratoandJ.Zabczyk,ErgodicityforInfiniteDimensionalSystems (Cambridge University Press, 1996)

  41. [51]

    Da Prato and J

    G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk,Stochastic Equations in Infinite Dimen- sions,EncyclopediaofMathematicsanditsApplications,Vol.44(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008) pp. xviii+454 pp

  42. [52]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Kolmogorov’s Hypotheses and Eulerian Turbulence Theory, The Physics of Fluids7, 1723 (1964)

  43. [53]

    Chen and R

    S. Chen and R. H. Kraichnan, Sweeping decorrelation in isotropic turbulence, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics1, 2019 (1989)

  44. [54]

    Eyink and U

    G. Eyink and U. Frisch, Robert H. Kraichnan, inA Voyage Through Turbulence(Cambridge University Press, 2011) pp. 329–372

  45. [55]

    Fjørtoft, On the Changes in the Spectral Distribution of Kinetic EnergyforTwo-Dimensional,NondivergentFlow,Tellus5,225(1953)

    R. Fjørtoft, On the Changes in the Spectral Distribution of Kinetic EnergyforTwo-Dimensional,NondivergentFlow,Tellus5,225(1953)

  46. [56]

    Greydanus, M

    S. Greydanus, M. Dzamba, and J. Yosinski, Hamiltonian neural net- works,inAdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems,Vol.32 (2019)

  47. [57]

    P.Jin,Z.Zhang,A.Zhu,Y.Tang,andG.E.Karniadakis,SympNets: In- trinsicstructure-preservingsymplecticnetworksforidentifyingHamil- tonian systems, Neural Networks132, 166 (2020)

  48. [58]

    S.A.Desai,M.Mattheakis,D.Sondak,P.Protopapas,andS.J.Roberts, Port-hamiltonian neural networks for learning explicit time-dependent dynamical systems, Physical Review E104, 034312 (2021)

  49. [59]

    68 (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1997)

    R.Temam,Infinite-DimensionalDynamicalSystemsinMechanicsand Physics, 2nd ed., Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 68 (Springer- Verlag, New York, 1997)

  50. [60]

    Foias, O

    C. Foias, O. Manley, R. Rosa, and R. Temam,Navier-Stokes Equa- tions and Turbulence, Vol. 83 (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2001). 57

  51. [61]

    A. J. Majda and J. Harlim, Physics constrained nonlinear regression models for time series, Nonlinearity26, 201 (2013)

  52. [62]

    Kondrashov, M

    D. Kondrashov, M. D. Chekroun, and M. Ghil, Data-driven non- Markovian closure models, Physica D297, 33 (2015)

  53. [63]

    Wouters and V

    J. Wouters and V. Lucarini, Disentangling multi-level systems: aver- aging, correlations and memory, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Experiment , P03003 (2012)

  54. [64]

    J.WoutersandV.Lucarini,Multi-leveldynamicalsystems: connecting the Ruelle response theory and the Mori-Zwanzig approach, J. Stat. Phys.151, 850 (2013)

  55. [65]

    Santos Gutiérrez, V

    M. Santos Gutiérrez, V. Lucarini, M. D. Chekroun, and M. Ghil, Reduced-order models for coupled dynamical systems: Data-driven methods and the Koopman operator, Chaos31, 053116 (2021)

  56. [66]

    Canet, Functional renormalisation group for turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics950, P1 (2022)

    L. Canet, Functional renormalisation group for turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics950, P1 (2022)

  57. [67]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Eddy viscosity and diffusivity: exact formulas and approximations, Complex Systems1, 805 (1987)

  58. [68]

    W. D. McComb,The Physics of Fluid Turbulence(Oxford university press, 1990)

  59. [69]

    H.Brézis,FunctionalAnalysis,SobolevSpacesandPartialDifferential Equations(Springer, 2010)

  60. [70]

    Chueshov,Monotone Random Systems — Theory and Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol

    I. Chueshov,Monotone Random Systems — Theory and Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1779 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin,

  61. [71]

    Crauel and F

    H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probability Theory and Related Fields100, 365 (1994)

  62. [72]

    Crauel, A

    H. Crauel, A. Debussche, and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations9, 307 (1997)

  63. [73]

    M. D. Chekroun, H. Liu, and S. Wang,Approximation of Stochastic Invariant Manifolds: Stochastic Manifolds for Nonlinear SPDEs I, Springer Briefs in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2015)

  64. [74]

    M. D. Chekroun and N. E. Glatt-Holtz, Invariant measures for dissipa- tive dynamical systems: Abstract results and applications, Commun. Math. Phys.316, 723 (2012)

  65. [75]

    Cotter, D

    C. Cotter, D. Crisan, D. D. Holm, W. Pan, and I. Shevchenko, Numer- ically modeling stochastic Lie transport in fluid dynamics, Multiscale Modeling & Simulation17, 192 (2019)

  66. [76]

    Abraham, J

    R. Abraham, J. E. Marsden, and T. Ratiu,Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

  67. [77]

    D. G. Andrews and M. E. McIntyre, On wave-action and its relatives, Journal of Fluid Mechanics89, 647 (1978)

  68. [78]

    Bühler,Waves and Mean Flows, 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    O. Bühler,Waves and Mean Flows, 2nd ed., Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

  69. [79]

    D.D.Holm,Lagrangianaverages,averagedLagrangians,andthemean effects of fluctuations in fluid dynamics, Chaos12, 518 (2002)

  70. [80]

    A.D.GilbertandJ.Vanneste,GeometricgeneralisedLagrangian-mean theories, Journal of Fluid Mechanics839, 95 (2018)

  71. [81]

    A. D. Gilbert and J. Vanneste, Geometric approaches to lagrangian averaging, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics57, 117 (2025)

  72. [82]

    S. M. Griffies, The Gent–McWilliams skew flux, Journal of Physical Oceanography28, 831 (1998)

  73. [83]

    G. E. Manucharyan, A. F. Thompson, and M. A. Spall, Eddy memory mode of multidecadal variability in residual-mean ocean circulations withapplicationtothebeaufortgyre,JournalofPhysicalOceanography 47, 855 (2017)

  74. [84]

    H. A. Dijkstra, W. Moon, and G. E. Manucharyan, Eddy memory in weakly nonlinear two-layer quasi-geostrophic ocean flows, European Physical Journal Plus137, 1162 (2022)

  75. [85]

    C. J. Cotter, G. A. Gottwald, and D. D. Holm, Stochastic partial dif- ferential fluid equations as a diffusive limit of deterministic lagrangian multi-timedynamics,ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyA:Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences473(2017)

  76. [86]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences33, 1521 (1976)

  77. [87]

    C. E. Leith, Stochastic backscatter in a subgrid-scale model: Plane shearmixinglayer,PhysicsofFluidsA:FluidDynamics2,297(1990)

  78. [88]

    C.E.Leith,Stochasticmodelsofchaoticsystems,PhysicaD:Nonlinear Phenomena98, 481 (1996)

  79. [89]

    T. W. Ting, Certain non-steady flows of second-order fluids, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis14, 1 (1963)

  80. [90]

    Huilgol, A second order fluid of the differential type, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics3, 471 (1968)

    R. Huilgol, A second order fluid of the differential type, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics3, 471 (1968)

  81. [91]

    B.D.ColemanandW.Noll,Anapproximationtheoremforfunctionals, with applications in continuum mechanics, inThe Foundations of Me- chanics and Thermodynamics: Selected Papers(Springer, 1974) pp. 97–112

  82. [92]

    D.D.Joseph,M.Renardy,andJ.-C.Saut,Hyperbolicityandchangeof type in the flow of viscoelastic fluids, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis87, 213 (1985)

  83. [93]

    R. H. Kraichnan and J. R. Herring, A strain-based Lagrangian-history turbulence theory, Journal of Fluid Mechanics88, 355 (1978)

  84. [94]

    R.H.Kraichnan,Convergentstoturbulencefunctions,JournalofFluid Mechanics41, 189 (1970)

  85. [95]

    Leith, Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences28, 145 (1971)

    C. Leith, Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences28, 145 (1971)

  86. [96]

    S. A. Orszag, Lectures on the statistical theory of turbulence, inFluid Dynamics / Dynamique des Fluides, Les Houches 1973, edited by R. Balian and J.-L. Peube (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1977) pp. 235–374

  87. [97]

    Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Physical Review 80, 268 (1950)

    G.-C. Wick, The evaluation of the collision matrix, Physical Review 80, 268 (1950)

  88. [98]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Inertial-range transfer in two-and three-dimensional turbulence, J. Fluid Mech.47, 525 (1971)

  89. [99]

    L. M. Smithr and V. Yakhot, Finite-size effects in forced two- dimensional turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics274, 115 (1994)

  90. [100]

    J. C. McWilliams, The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in tur- bulent flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics146, 21 (1984)

  91. [101]

    Tennekes, Eulerian and lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics67, 561 (1975)

    H. Tennekes, Eulerian and lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics67, 561 (1975)

  92. [102]

    Boffetta and R

    G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Two-dimensional turbulence, Annual Re- view of Fluid Mechanics44, 427 (2012)

  93. [103]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Irreversible statistical mechanics of incompressible hydromagnetic turbulence, Physical Review109, 1407 (1958)

  94. [104]

    R. H. Kraichnan, Kolmogorov’s Hypotheses and Eulerian Turbulence Theory, Physics of Fluids7, 1723 (1964)

  95. [105]

    R. H. Kraichnan and D. Montgomery, Two-dimensional turbulence, Reports on Progress in Physics43, 547 (1980)

  96. [106]

    Boffetta, A

    G. Boffetta, A. Celani, and M. Vergassola, Inverse energy cascade in two-dimensional turbulence: Deviations from Gaussian behavior, Physical Review E61, R29 (2000)

  97. [107]

    S.DanilovandD.Gurarie,Forcedtwo-dimensionalturbulenceinspec- tral and physical space, Physical Review E63, 061208 (2001)

  98. [108]

    G.K.Vallis,AtmosphericandOceanicFluidDynamics,2nded.(Cam- bridge University Press, 2017)

  99. [109]

    W. D. McComb, Galilean invariance and vertex renormalization in turbulence theory, Physical Review E71, 037301 (2005)

  100. [110]

    Sanada and V

    T. Sanada and V. Shanmugasundaram, Random sweeping effect in isotropic numerical turbulence, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics 4, 1245 (1992)

  101. [111]

    Kaneda, Lagrangian and eulerian time correlations in turbulence, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics5, 2835 (1993)

    Y. Kaneda, Lagrangian and eulerian time correlations in turbulence, Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics5, 2835 (1993)

  102. [112]

    12, edited by M

    J.R.HerringandR.H.Kraichnan,Comparisonofsomeapproximations for isotropic turbulence, inStatistical Models and Turbulence, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 12, edited by M. Rosenblatt and C. M. Van Atta (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972) pp. 148–194

  103. [113]

    Tarpin, L

    M. Tarpin, L. Canet, and N. Wschebor, Breaking of scale invariance in the time dependence of correlation functions in isotropic and homoge- neous turbulence, Physical Review E98, 023114 (2018)

  104. [114]

    D. C. Leslie,Developments in the Theory of Turbulence(Clarendon Press, 1973)

  105. [115]

    W. D. McComb,The Physics of Fluid Turbulence(Oxford University Press, 1990)

  106. [116]

    J. A. Krommes, Fundamental statistical descriptions of plasma turbu- lence in magnetic fields, Physics Reports360, 1 (2002)

  107. [117]

    P. J. Mason and D. J. Thomson, Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulations of boundary layers, Journal of Fluid Mechanics242, 51 (1992)

  108. [118]

    U. Schumann, Stochastic backscatter of turbulence energy and scalar variance by random subgrid-scale fluxes, Proceedings of the Royal SocietyofLondon.SeriesA:MathematicalandPhysicalSciences451, 58 293 (1995)

  109. [119]

    R.A.Clark,J.H.Ferziger,andW.C.Reynolds,Evaluationofsubgrid- scale models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics91, 1 (1979)

  110. [120]

    J.Bardina,J.H.Ferziger,andW.C.Reynolds,Improvedsubgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation, inAIAA 13th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 80-1357 (1980)

  111. [121]

    S. A. Orszag, Analytical theories of turbulence, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics41, 363 (1970)

  112. [122]

    Duraisamy, G

    K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao, Turbulence modeling in the age of data, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics51, 357 (2019)

  113. [123]

    A. D. Beck, D. G. Flad, and C.-D. Munz, Deep neural networks for data-driven LES closure models, Journal of Computational Physics 398, 108910 (2019)

  114. [124]

    Maulik, O

    R. Maulik, O. San, A. Rasheed, and P. Vedula, Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks, Journal of Fluid Mechanics858, 122 (2019)

  115. [125]

    Srinivasan, M

    K. Srinivasan, M. D. Chekroun, and J. C. McWilliams, Turbulence closurewithsmall,localneuralnetworks: Forcedtwo-dimensionaland β-plane flows, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems16, e2023MS003795 (2024)

  116. [126]

    Bertalan, F

    T. Bertalan, F. Dietrich, I. Mezić, and I. G. Kevrekidis, On learning Hamiltonian systems from data, Chaos29, 121107 (2019)

  117. [127]

    Cranmer, S

    M. Cranmer, S. Greydanus, S. Hoyer, P. Battaglia, D. Spergel, and S.Ho,Lagrangianneuralnetworks(2020),arXiv:2003.04630[cs.LG]

  118. [128]

    Y.D.Zhong,B.Dey,andA.Chakraborty,SymplecticODE-net: Learn- inghamiltoniandynamicswithcontrol,inInternationalConferenceon Learning Representations(2020)

  119. [129]

    Z. Liu, Y. Wang, S. Vaidya, F. Ruehle, J. Halverson, M. Soljacic, T. Hou, and M. Tegmark, KAN: Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks, in Internationalconferenceonlearningrepresentations,Vol.2025(2025) pp. 70367–70413

  120. [130]

    M. K. Verma, Turbulence: A nonequilibrium field theory, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.19367 (2025)

  121. [131]

    Darve, J

    E. Darve, J. Solomon, and A. Kia, Computing generalized Langevin equationsandgeneralizedFokker–Planckequations,Proceedingsofthe National Academy of Sciences106, 10884 (2009)

  122. [132]

    A. J. Chorin, O. H. Hald, and R. Kupferman, Optimal prediction and the Mori–Zwanzig representation of irreversible processes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97, 2968 (2000)

  123. [133]

    Stinis, Higher order Mori-Zwanzig models for the Euler equations, Multiscale Model

    P. Stinis, Higher order Mori-Zwanzig models for the Euler equations, Multiscale Model. & Simul.6, 741 (2007)

  124. [134]

    E.J.ParishandK.Duraisamy,AdynamicsubgridscalemodelforLarge Eddy Simulations based on the Mori–Zwanzig formalism, Journal of Computational Physics349, 154 (2017)

  125. [135]

    E.J.ParishandK.Duraisamy,Non-Markovianclosuremodelsforlarge eddysimulations usingthe Mori-Zwanzigformalism, PhysicalReview Fluids2, 014604 (2017)

  126. [136]

    J. A. Krommes, Non-Gaussian statistics, classical field theory, and realizable Langevin models, Physical Review E53, 4865 (1996)

  127. [137]

    Arnold and M

    L. Arnold and M. Scheutzow, Perfect cocycles through stochastic dif- ferentialequations,Probabilitytheoryandrelatedfields101,65(1995)

  128. [138]

    Arnold,Random Dynamical Systems(Springer-Verlag, New York,

    L. Arnold,Random Dynamical Systems(Springer-Verlag, New York,

  129. [139]

    R.C.Bourret,Stochasticallyperturbedfields,withapplicationstowave propagation in random media, Il Nuovo Cimento26, 1 (1962)

  130. [140]

    Nualart,The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 2nd ed., Prob- ability and Its Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2006)

    D. Nualart,The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 2nd ed., Prob- ability and Its Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2006)

Pith tools