Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 66 references

An ionic clock qubit inside a circular Rydberg atom

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In one strontium atom, the Rydberg electron and the ionic-core electron form two coherently coupled qubits, and the quadrupole interaction drives a two-qubit rotation through an entangled state.

desk verdict First coherent manipulation of a Sr+ clock qubit inside a circular Rydberg atom, with a solid quadrupole characterization and an explicitly provisional entanglement claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.06988 v1 pith:BQZ4U6SY submitted 2026-08-07 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Fabian Thielemann , Aaron Götzelmann , Marius Thomas , Einius Pultinevicius , Armin Humić , Christian Hölzl , Florian Meinert This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords circularRydbergstatesstrontiumopticalclockqubitquadrupoleinteractionMølmer-Sørensengatetwo-qubitentanglementtweezersdynamicaldecouplingioncore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that two valence electrons inside a single alkaline-earth atom can serve as two independent, long-lived qubits: a microwave qubit encoded in circular Rydberg states and an optical qubit encoded on the narrow quadrupole clock transition of the ionic core. In strontium-88 atoms held in optical tweezers, the authors demonstrate coherent control of the ionic-core clock qubit while the Rydberg electron orbits far away, with coherence times of several hundred microseconds under dynamical decoupling. They show that the two qubits are coupled by the electrostatic quadrupole interaction between the Rydberg electron's charged-ring field and the core's D-orbital, measure a differential quadrupole shift of $\Delta\nu_Q = 5.83(11)$ kHz, and map the coupling's angular tunability down to zero at a magic angle. They then implement a two-qubit rotation reminiscent of a M\o lmer-S\o rensen gate that passes through an entangled state, reporting an $R_{yy}(\pi)$ fidelity of $78(15)\%$. If correct, this gives a single atom with one electronic qubit acting as data and another as ancilla, reducing the need for extra atoms in neighboring traps.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the two-electron electrostatic coupling. The circular Rydberg electron, localized in a thin torus far from the core, acts as a ring of charge whose field gradient at the ionic core is $\partial E/\partial z = -(4E_h)/(e a_0^2)\,1/(4n^6-n^4)$; this gradient shifts the $D_{5/2}$ magnetic sublevels by $h\nu_Q = (3/40)(\partial E/\partial z)\,\Theta(D,5/2)\,(35/12-m_J^2)(3\cos^2\vartheta-1)$. The differential shift between the two Rydberg states, $\Delta\nu_Q = \nu_{Q,\downarrow} - \nu_{Q,\uparrow}$, provides the qubit-state-dependent phase. Applying simultaneous spin-echo or XY8 decoupling on both qubits cancels the common-mode shift, leaving a phase buildup proportional to $\Delta\nu_Q$ alone, which realizes the two-qubit rotation $R_{yy}(-\phi)$ reminiscent of the M\o lmer-S\o rensen gate. The angle $\vartheta$ between the magnetic field and the electric quantization field of the Rydberg electron tunes the coupling from maximum to zero at the magic angle.

What would settle it

Measure the differential quadrupole shift $\Delta\nu_Q$ for at least three principal quantum numbers $n$ and check the ratios against the $1/(4n^6-n^4)$ scaling predicted by the charged-ring model; a deviation beyond experimental uncertainty, or direct observation of state-dependent loss from autoionization when the core is shelved, would rule out the model and the gate interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the circular Rydberg electron and the ionic-core electron of one strontium atom are individually controllable qubits whose coupling is the ordinary electrostatic quadrupole interaction, tunable via the relative orientation of the two quantization axes. The paper demonstrates coherent shelving spectroscopy on the $5S_{1/2}\rightarrow 4D_{5/2}$ clock transition inside a circular Rydberg atom, measures the ionic-core quadrupole moment as $\Theta(D,5/2) = 3.02(5)\,e a_0^2$, resolves the differential quadrupole shift between the $|79C\rangle$ and $|81C\rangle$ Rydberg states as $\Delta\nu_Q = 5.83(11)$ kHz, and uses the resulting state-dependent phase to drive an $R_{yy}(\pi)$ two-qubit rotation with $78(15)\%$ fidelity. The parity oscillations observed after a half-rotation are presented as evidence that the operation evolves through a two-qubit entangled state, in the spirit of a M\o lmer-S\o rensen gate.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the circular Rydberg electron's charge acts as a fixed ring of charge producing a specific field gradient at the ionic core, with no exchange coupling or autoionization disturbing the qubits; if the real gradient differs from that model, the extracted quadrupole moment, the differential shift, and the two-qubit gate interpretation all shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Together with single-qubit rotations, the demonstrated $R_{yy}$ rotation completes a universal gate set, allowing e.g. a CNOT and a non-destructive, local optical readout of the circular Rydberg qubit.
  • The clock laser enables site-resolved state preparation of a Rydberg array, either by local addressing or by globally addressing all atoms while light-shifting selected ones out of resonance.
  • The ionic core can serve as an embedded ancilla qubit while the circular Rydberg qubit acts as the data qubit with long-range interactions, opening a single-atom route to quantum simulation.
  • For metrology, the narrow clock transition can be interrogated inside a microscopically controlled environment, and with circular-state lifetimes above 10 ms (extendable cryogenically) clock spectroscopy could approach ion-clock repetition rates.
  • Rotating the electric quantization field tunes the quadrupole coupling from its maximum to zero at the magic angle, giving a fast in situ on/off switch for the two-qubit interaction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same shift measurement can serve as a local probe of the circular Rydberg wavefunction: measuring $\Delta\nu_Q$ at several $n$ would test the charged-ring gradient prediction far more stringently than the single-comparison reported here.
  • Nothing in the scheme is specific to strontium-88; choosing another alkaline-earth species or different circular-state $n$ would change the coupling strength and gate speed, since the differential shift depends on $n$ and on the core quadrupole moment.
  • The paper leaves implicit that an embedded, laser-addressable clock qubit could act as an optical-microwave interface, transferring photonic information into the long-range Rydberg interaction network of an array, for example as a local ancilla for mid-circuit measurement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. Thielemann et al. demonstrate a two-qubit platform based on a single 88Sr atom: a circular Rydberg qubit (n=79/81) and an optical clock qubit on the 5S1/2→4D5/2 quadrupole transition of the ionic core. They achieve coherent Rabi oscillations and dynamical decoupling (T2 ≈ 400–550 µs), measure the quadrupole moment Θ(D,5/2) = 3.02(5) ea0^2 through three independent methods, resolve the differential quadrupole shift ΔνQ = 5.83(11) kHz, and map the angular dependence of the coupling. They then implement a two-qubit Ryy rotation reminiscent of a Mølmer-Sørensen gate and interpret the observed population and parity oscillations as evidence of evolution through an entangled state.

Significance. The platform itself is novel and potentially significant: a single atom hosting two individually controllable, long-lived electronic qubits with a tunable electrostatic coupling. The quadrupole-shift measurements are a particular strength, as they are cross-checked in three independent ways (spectroscopy, differential shift, angular scan) and agree with the most precise independent theoretical and experimental values. The coherence times under dynamical decoupling are impressive. The two-qubit gate demonstration is suggestive, but the entangled-state claim is not quantitatively substantiated, as discussed below. If the entanglement claim is either hardened with a direct witness or appropriately softened, the paper would make a solid contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV, Eqs. (8)-(9), Figs. 5-6; Abstract and Conclusion] The central claim that the operation 'evolves through an entangled state' is not supported by the presented data. The authors themselves state in Section IV that 'P alone is not a sufficient signature' and that the observation is 'not a quantitative verification of entanglement creation.' The population oscillations in Fig. 5 and the parity oscillations in Fig. 6 are consistent with a coherent Ryy rotation, but they do not distinguish the target Bell state from a separable state with the same single-qubit phases (for example, |++>). To substantiate the entangled-state claim, the authors should either: (i) measure an entanglement witness that accounts for the 10–20% readout crosstalk, (ii) perform two-qubit state tomography and report a fidelity to the target Bell state exceeding 1/2 after SPAM correction, or (iii) temper the abstract and conclusion so that they state the data are consistent with, but do not prove, the creation of an entangled state.
  2. [Section IV, F_yy (Fig. 5c)] The quoted two-qubit rotation fidelity F_yy = 78(15)% is obtained from a fit of the coherent model to population data, not from a direct measurement of the output state fidelity. The phrase 'where SPAM errors are subtracted' is not accompanied by a definition or protocol. Without a clear definition (e.g., average gate fidelity from randomized benchmarking, or state fidelity from tomography), the number is difficult to interpret. Please specify how F_yy is computed and how SPAM errors are subtracted, or rename the quantity (for example, 'population-transfer contrast').
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2), Section III A] The charged-ring expression for the field gradient, Eq. (2), is central to the quadrupole-moment extraction; a brief derivation or a more explicit citation of the model would improve accessibility.
  2. [Eq. (6), Section III C] The final quadrupole moment in Eq. (6) is given as Θexp(D,5/2) = 3.02(5) stat ea0^2; the text should also state the estimated systematic uncertainty from the electric-field calibration and the offset-angle determination, since these enter the weighted mean.
  3. [Fig. 6 insets] The population histograms shown in the insets of Fig. 6 are presented without error bars; adding statistical uncertainties would make the (anti-)correlation claim more transparent.
  4. [Abstract and Section IV] The phrase 'reminiscent of a Mølmer-Sørensen gate' is used loosely; the gate here is not mediated by a shared phonon mode but by the static quadrupole interaction, and this distinction should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the quadrupole coupling is benchmarked against independent values, and the paper itself states that the parity data are not a quantitative entanglement verification.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and externally anchored. The key input, Eq. (2) for the charged-ring field gradient, is cited to Refs. [16,17]; Ref. [17] shares authors with this paper, but Eq. (2) is not used as an unproven postulate. Converting the measured clock-transition shifts with Eq. (2) yields Theta_exp(D,5/2)=3.02(5)ea_0^2, which agrees with the independent theoretical value 2.935(17)ea_0^2 [36] and the independent experimental value 2.973(+0.026/-0.033)ea_0^2 [37]. The differential shift Delta_nu_Q=5.83(11) kHz is measured by spin-echo Ramsey interferometry via Eq. (4), not obtained by fitting the gate data; the gate fits then use that measured frequency as a fixed parameter, so no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper explicitly flags the main limitation of the entanglement claim: 'P alone is not a sufficient signature of a successful R_yy operation' and 'this is not a quantitative verification of entanglement creation' (Sec. IV). That is an evidence-strength caveat about the absence of a witness or tomography, not a definitional circularity: the Bell-state interpretation is neither forced by the data by construction nor derived from a self-citation chain. Self-citations to Refs. [17,20,21,30] concern a companion theory paper, experimental setup details, and lifetime measurements; none functions as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole support of a predicted quantity. The score of 2 reflects only the presence of a minor self-citation and the acknowledged verification gap, not an exhibited circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The two qubits are two electrons of the same atom in well-known states.

free parameters (3)
  • Quadrupole moment of Sr+ 4D5/2, Θ(D,5/2) = 3.02(5) ea0^2
    Weighted mean of three independent measurements (spectroscopy 3.2(3), differential shift 3.09(6), angular scan 2.91(7)). Used to compute ΔνQ and to validate Eq. 1; agrees with external theory 2.935(17) and prior measurement 2.973(+0.026/-0.033).
  • Differential quadrupole shift ΔνQ between |79C> and |81C> = 5.83(11) kHz
    Measured via spin-echo phase; sets the free-evolution time for the Ryy gate (1/(2ΔνQ) ≈ 90 µs). Consistent with 5.61(6) kHz predicted using Ref [37].
  • Offset angle ϑ0 between B field and z-axis = 4.6(4) deg
    Fitted in angular dependence (Fig. 4c) and used to report the magic-angle behavior.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The circular Rydberg electron creates an electric field gradient at the ionic core given by Eq. 2 (charged-ring model).
    Assumed from earlier work [16,17]; agreement of extracted Θ with independent values supports this.
  • domain assumption Exchange interaction and autoionization are negligible for circular Rydberg states n=79,81.
    Stated in Sec. I; necessary for independent manipulation of the two electrons; supported by prior lifetime and autoionization studies [13,14,20].
  • domain assumption The standard quadrupole shift formula Eq. 1 applies to the Sr+ core inside the Rydberg atom.
    Borrowed from ion-trap clocks [38]; validated by the linear mJ^2 dependence in Fig. 2.
  • domain assumption The two-qubit evolution during the gate is described by the diagonal Hamiltonian Eq. 7 with no additional couplings.
    Required for the Ryy interpretation; supported by the measured frequency matched to ΔνQ/2 and the absence of observed extra shifts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An ionic clock qubit inside a circular Rydberg atom." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQZ4U6SY

@misc{pith2026260806988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An ionic clock qubit inside a circular Rydberg atom},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQZ4U6SY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.06988}
}
read the original abstract

Neutral atoms trapped in optical tweezers and excited to Rydberg states, together with trapped ions, are among the most advanced platforms for quantum simulation and quantum computing. Current experiments often rely on additional atoms in neighboring traps to encode ancilla qubits for local manipulation and readout. Here, we demonstrate a dual ion-Rydberg system comprising two qubits encoded in two individually controlled electrons of the same alkaline-earth atom. The first, a microwave qubit, is encoded in a pair of circular Rydberg states, while the second, an optical qubit, is encoded on a narrow quadrupole transition of the Rydberg atom's ionic core. We demonstrate coherent control of the optical qubit and achieve coherence times of several hundred microseconds under dynamical decoupling. Furthermore, we realize coherent coupling between the two electrons via electrostatic quadrupole interactions over the large separation between the Rydberg electron and the ionic core, and map out its angular tunability. Finally, we demonstrate a two-qubit operation, reminiscent of a M{\o}lmer-S{\o}rensen gate, that evolves through an entangled state of the two qubits driven by the quadrupole coupling. Our work opens a pathway to exploit a pair of individually controlled electronic qubits with tunable coupling for quantum simulation and quantum metrology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.06988 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. ). We can exploit this to determine Θ(D, 5/2) by direct spectroscopy of the clock transition. To do so, we measure the transition frequencies of transition pairs with equal m2 J and opposite relative magnetic mo￾ment µrel = µB [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Heisenberg, Mehrk¨ orperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik38, 411 (1926)

    W. Heisenberg, Mehrk¨ orperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik38, 411 (1926)

    work page 1926

  2. [2]

    All errorbars indicate 1σconfidence intervals and, where invisible, are smaller than the marker size

    The vertical dashed lines mark the magic angle at which the quadrupole shift vanishes. All errorbars indicate 1σconfidence intervals and, where invisible, are smaller than the marker size. sey fringes measured fort w = 90µs is shown in Fig. 4a). Note that the difference in fringe contrast is not caused by loss of coherence, but by a lower detection rate o...

    work page

  3. [3]

    magic angle

    The residuals of the fit are shown in Fig. 4b) alongside the value calculated using Θ(D,5/2) from Ref. [37] and Eq. 2. The dependence of Eq. 1 on the angle betweenBand the quadrupole field also yields an interesting handle to tune the interaction between the CRS and the optical qubit. At ournand typicalE-fields of>0.5 V cm −1 the energy spacing defined by...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Taking the weighted mean of all three measurements performed in this work, we report Θexp(D,5/2) = 3.02(5) stat ea2 0.(6) We estimate that the systematic effect of the applied elec- tric field is at least an order of magnitude below our spec- troscopic resolution (see Appendix C) IV. ENT ANGLEMENT BETWEEN CRS AND OPTICAL QUBIT Having established coherent ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    parity oscillations

    The finalπ/2- pulses rotate it such that (anti-)correlations become ap- parent in the two-qubit basis accessible to our measure- ments. Varying the phaseϕ det of either of the clos- ing pulses, while leaving the other atϕ det = 0, re- sults in different final states which can show correlations (ϕdet = 0), anti-correlations (ϕdet =π) or no correlations (ϕd...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    When switching the phase of either of the closingπ/2-pulses toϕ det =π, we instead 11 obtain U ′ XY8 (ϕQ) =   0icos ϕQ 2 −sin ϕQ 2 0 icos ϕQ 2 0 0 sin ϕQ 2 sin ϕQ 2 0 0icos ϕQ 2 0−sin ϕQ 2 icos ϕQ 2 0   , inverting the parityPand transforming|↓S⟩ → −(|↓D⟩ −i|↑S⟩)/ √

    work page

  7. [7]

    We characterize this behavior of our gate in Fig. 6. Due to the faster Rabi rates possible on the CRS qubit, we have adapted an XY8 decoupling sequence with differ- ent pulse durations between qubits, shown in Fig. 9. We simulate the full pulse sequence, including driving Hamil- tonians, numerically. For an intuitive understanding of the buildup of entang...

    work page

  8. [8]

    The finite pulse durations lead to a deviation from the ideal gate operation, an effect that is known from quantum sensing and single qubit decoupling se- quences [57, 58]

    Over the course of the sequence the characteristic ring structure of triplet Bell states [56] forms and is rotated tozby the closingπ/2-pulses. The finite pulse durations lead to a deviation from the ideal gate operation, an effect that is known from quantum sensing and single qubit decoupling se- quences [57, 58]. We quantify this effect by simulating th...

    work page

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    McQuillen, X

    P. McQuillen, X. Zhang, T. Strickler, F. B. Dunning, and T. C. Killian, Imaging the evolution of an ultracold strontium Rydberg gas, Phys. Rev. A87, 013407 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Tanner, K

    G. Tanner, K. Richter, and J.-M. Rost, The theory of two-electron atoms: between ground state and complete fragmentation, Rev. Mod. Phys.72, 497 (2000)

    2000

  3. [11]

    M. S. Safronova, S. G. Porsev, C. Sanner, and J. Ye, Two clock transitions in neutral Yb for the highest sensitivity to variations of the fine-structure constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 173001 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and S. Schiller, Testing physics beyond the standard model through additional clock transitions in neutral ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A98, 022501 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Ishiyama, K

    T. Ishiyama, K. Ono, T. Takano, A. Sunaga, and Y. Taka- hashi, Observation of an inner-shell orbital clock transi- tion in neutral ytterbium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 153402 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensi- ties and Phase Shifts, Phys

    U. Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensi- ties and Phase Shifts, Phys. Rev.124, 1866 (1961)

    1961

  7. [15]

    magic angle

    Physikalisches Institut and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology, Universit¨ at Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany (Dated: August 10, 2026) Neutral atoms trapped in optical tweezers and excited to Rydberg states, together with trapped ions,...

    2026 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Arimondo, C

    E. Arimondo, C. W. Clark, and W. C. Martin, Collo- quium: Ettore majorana and the birth of autoionization, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1947 (2010)

    2010

  9. [17]

    Lochead, D

    G. Lochead, D. Boddy, D. P. Sadler, C. S. Adams, and M. P. A. Jones, Number-resolved imaging of excited-state atoms using a scanning autoionization microscope, Phys. Rev. A87, 053409 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Lehec, X

    H. Lehec, X. Hua, P. Pillet, and P. Cheinet, Isolated core excitation of high-orbital-quantum-number rydberg states of ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A103, 022806 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    R. G. Hulet and D. Kleppner, Rydberg atoms in ”circu- lar” states, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1430 (1983)

    1983

  12. [20]

    J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulat- ing quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 565 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Roussel, M

    F. Roussel, M. Cheret, L. Chen, T. Bolzinger, G. Spiess, J. Hare, and M. Gross, Observation of Circular- Metastable Doubly Excited States of Barium, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3112 (1990)

    1990

  14. [22]

    R. C. Teixeira, A. Larrouy, A. Muni, L. Lachaud, J.-M. Raimond, S. Gleyzes, and M. Brune, Preparation of long- lived, non-autoionizing circular rydberg states of stron- tium, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 263001 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    A. Muni, L. Lachaud, A. Couto, M. Poirier, R. C. Teix- eira, J.-M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, Optical coherent manipulation of alkaline-earth circular Rydberg states, Nat. Phys.18, 502 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Wirth, C

    M. Wirth, C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, and F. Meinert, Quadrupole coupling of circular Rydberg qubits to inner shell excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 123403 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Cooper, J

    A. Cooper, J. P. Covey, I. S. Madjarov, S. G. Porsev, M. S. Safronova, and M. Endres, Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. X8, 041055 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman, Micro- scopic Control and Detection of Ultracold Strontium in Optical-Tweezer Arrays, Phys. Rev. X8, 041054 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth, and F. Meinert, Long-Lived Circular Rydberg Qubits of Alkaline-Earth Atoms in Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021024 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Pultinevicius, A

    E. Pultinevicius, A. G¨ otzelmann, F. Thielemann, C. H¨ olzl, and F. Meinert, Long-lived giant circu- lar Rydberg atoms at room temperature (2025), arXiv:2510.27471

    2025

  22. [30]

    thesis, Leopold-Franzens Univer- sit¨ at, Innsbruck (2000)

    Christian Roos,Controlling the Quantum State of Trapped Ions, Ph.D. thesis, Leopold-Franzens Univer- sit¨ at, Innsbruck (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    Akerman and R

    N. Akerman and R. Ozeri, Operating a Multi-Ion Clock with Dynamical Decoupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 013201 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Manovitz, Y

    T. Manovitz, Y. Shapira, L. Gazit, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri, Trapped-ion quantum computer with robust entangling gates and quantum coherent feedback, PRX Quantum3, 010347 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Lindvall, T

    T. Lindvall, T. Fordell, K. Hanhij¨ arvi, M. Doleˇ z al, J. Rahm, S. Weyers, and A. Wallin, 88Sr+ optical clock with 7.9E-19 systematic uncertainty and measurement of its absolute frequency with 9.8E-17 uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044082 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Anand, C

    S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nat. Phys. 20, 1744 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Machu, A

    Y. Machu, A. Dur´ an-Hern´ andez, G. Creutzer, A. A. Young, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and C. Sayrin, Non- destructive optical readout and manipulation of circular rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X16, 021040 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Corti˜ nas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, Th. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, Towards Quantum Simulation with Circular Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. X8, 011032 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with rydberg interac- tions in an optical clock, Nature621, 734 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, M. Wirth, M. S. Safronova, S. Weber, and F. Meinert, Motional ground-state cooling of single atoms in state-dependent optical tweezers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033093 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Marceau, S

    C. Marceau, S. Beattie, K. Kato, B. Jian, M. Gertsvolf, and P. Dub´ e, Absolute frequency measurement of a 88Sr+ clock by direct comparison to a primary frequency stan- dard, Metrologia62, 045001 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    S. X. Wang, J. Labaziewicz, Y. Ge, R. Shewmon, and I. L. Chuang, Demonstration of a quantum logic gate in a cryogenic surface-electrode ion trap, Phys. Rev. A81, 062332 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    O. Katz, M. Pinkas, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri, Quantum logic detection of collisions between single atom–ion pairs, Nat. Phys.18, 533 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Akerman, N

    N. Akerman, N. Navon, S. Kotler, Y. Glickman, and R. Ozeri, Universal gate-set for trapped-ion qubits using a narrow linewidth diode laser, New J. Phys.17, 113060 (2015)

    2015

  35. [43]

    Higgins, F

    G. Higgins, F. Pokorny, C. Zhang, Q. Bodart, and M. Hennrich, Coherent Control of a Single Trapped Ry- dberg Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 220501 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Jiang, B

    D. Jiang, B. Arora, and M. S. Safronova, Electric quadrupole moments of metastable states of Ca+ , Sr+ , and Ba+, Phys. Rev. A78, 022514 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Shaniv, N

    R. Shaniv, N. Akerman, and R. Ozeri, Atomic Quadrupole Moment Measurement Using Dynamic De- 13 coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 140801 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Itano, External-field shifts of the 199Hg+ optical fre- quency standard, J

    W. Itano, External-field shifts of the 199Hg+ optical fre- quency standard, J. Res. NIST105, 829 (2000)

    2000

  39. [47]

    G. P. Barwood, H. S. Margolis, G. Huang, P. Gill, and H. A. Klein, Measurement of the Electric Quadrupole Mo- ment of the 4d 2D 5/2 Level in 88Sr+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 133001 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    Lindvall, K

    T. Lindvall, K. J. Hanhij¨ arvi, T. Fordell, and A. E. Wallin, High-accuracy determination of Paul-trap stabil- ity parameters for electric-quadrupole-shift prediction, J. Appl. Phys.132, 124401 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Dub´ e, A

    P. Dub´ e, A. A. Madej, J. E. Bernard, L. Marmet, J.- S. Boulanger, and S. Cundy, Electric Quadrupole Shift Cancellation in Single-Ion Optical Frequency Standards, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 033001 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Dub´ e, A

    P. Dub´ e, A. A. Madej, Z. Zhou, and J. E. Bernard, Eval- uation of systematic shifts of the 88Sr+ single-ion optical frequency standard at the 10E-17 level, Phys. Rev. A87, 023806 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    A. A. Madej and J. D. Sankey, Single, trapped Sr + atom: Laser cooling and quantum jumps by means of the 4d 2D 5/2–5s2S1/2 transition, Opt. Lett.15, 634 (1990)

    1990

  44. [52]

    M´ ehaignerie, Y

    P. M´ ehaignerie, Y. Machu, A. Dur´ an Hern´ andez, G. Creutzer, D. Papoular, J. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, Interacting Circular Rydberg Atoms Trapped in Optical Tweezers , PRX Quantum6, 010353 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Sørensen and K

    A. Sørensen and K. Mølmer, Quantum Computation with Ions in Thermal Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1971 (1999)

    1999

  46. [54]

    Manovitz, A

    T. Manovitz, A. Rotem, R. Shaniv, I. Cohen, Y. Shapira, N. Akerman, A. Retzker, and R. Ozeri, Fast Dynami- cal Decoupling of the Mølmer-Sørensen Entangling Gate, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 220505 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and entanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer ar- ray, Science382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Smith, A

    M. Smith, A. Leu, M. Gely, and D. Lucas, Individually Addressed Quantum Gate Interactions Using Dynamical Decoupling, PRX Quantum5, 030321 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    N¨ unnerich, D

    M. N¨ unnerich, D. Cohen, P. Barthel, P. H. Huber, D. Ni- roomand, A. Retzker, and C. Wunderlich, Fast, Robust, and Laser-Free Universal Entangling Gates for Trapped- Ion Quantum Computing, Phys. Rev. X15, 021079 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    J. Jin, Y. Shi, Y. A. Alaoui, J. Deng, Y. Lu, J. D. Thomp- son, and W. S. Bakr, Extended Rydberg Lifetimes in a Cryogenic Atom Array (2026), arXiv:2602.05959

    2026 arXiv

  51. [59]

    K. N. Blodgett, S. S. Phatak, M. R. Chen, D. Peana, C. Pritts, and J. D. Hood, Narrow-line electric quadrupole cooling and background-free imaging of a sin- gle Cs atom with spatially structured light, Phys. Rev. A 112, 043109 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Meinert, C

    F. Meinert, C. H¨ olzl, M. A. Nebioglu, A. D’Arnese, P. Karl, M. Dressel, and M. Scheffler, Indium tin oxide films meet circular Rydberg atoms: Prospects for novel quantum simulation schemes, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023192 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    M. L. Zimmerman, M. G. Littman, M. M. Kash, and D. Kleppner, Stark structure of the Rydberg states of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A20, 2251 (1979)

    1979

  54. [62]

    M¨ ogerle, F

    J. M¨ ogerle, F. Hummel, A. Keil, T. Legrand, E. J. Braun, H. Menke, J. King, B. Olmos, S. Hofferberth, H. P. B¨ u chler, and S. Weber, Accurate Modeling of Rydberg Atoms and Their Interactions : Theory and Implementa- tion in PairInteraction (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Ma- trix, Proc

    K. Husimi, Some Formal Properties of the Density Ma- trix, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn.22, 264 (1940)

    1940

  56. [64]

    Leuchs, R

    G. Leuchs, R. Dong, and D. Sych, Triplet-like correlation symmetry of continuous variable entangled states, New J. Phys.11, 113040 (2009)

    2009

  57. [65]

    M. J. Biercuk, H. Uys, A. P. VanDevender, N. Shiga, W. M. Itano, and J. J. Bollinger, Experimental Uhrig dynamical decoupling using trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A 79, 062324 (2009)

    2009

  58. [66]

    Ishikawa, A

    T. Ishikawa, A. Yoshizawa, Y. Mawatari, H. Watanabe, and S. Kashiwaya, Influence of Dynamical Decoupling Sequences with Finite-Width Pulses on Quantum Sens- ing for AC Magnetometry, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 054059 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.