Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 229 references

Efficient three-dimensional variational data assimilation of multi-plane PIV data

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Restricting the adjoint control space to 12% of the mesh reproduces a global 3D flow assimilation while using 58% of the memory.

desk verdict Adjoint localisation is a genuinely useful idea and the reconstruction evidence is solid, but the two headline memory-savings numbers are internally inconsistent with the stated mechanism and the abstract overstates which case is actually comparable in fidelity. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07469 v1 pith:W63ATWXH submitted 2026-08-07 physics.flu-dyn

Uttam Cadambi Padmanaban , Samaresh Midya , Ping He , Bharathram Ganapathisubramani , Sean Symon This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords variationaldataassimilationdiscreteadjointlocalisationReynolds-averagedNavier-StokesparticleimagevelocimetryrecirculationbubblememoryreductionSpalart-Allmarasmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that three-dimensional variational data assimilation of sparse experimental velocity data can be made practical by optimising a corrective momentum forcing over a small subdomain instead of the entire mesh. Using 12 cross-stream planes of stereo PIV data in the wake of a vehicle-like bluff body at $Re_L=5.64\times10^5$, it finds that a localisation box covering the body and near wake reproduces the full-domain reconstruction in the integrated $L^1$ velocity mismatch, in the forcing pattern, and in the mean flow on the symmetry plane, while using 58% of the peak memory. The method corrects the baseline RANS eddy-viscosity solution well enough to recover the asymmetric three-dimensional recirculation bubble, and derived quantities such as Reynolds shear stress and mean pressure show agreement with experiment or with vorticity structure. The data-efficiency result implies that measurement planes must extend at least to the end of the primary recirculation region; otherwise the reconstructed far wake is too weak.

What carries the argument

The central object is the corrective momentum forcing $f_c$ added to the time-averaged momentum equations, together with a gradient-based regularisation term $\lambda\sum|\nabla f_c|^2$ that prevents spurious localised corrections. Adjoint localisation restricts $f_c$ to a static, user-defined subdomain $\Omega_d\subset\Omega$ specified by a rectangular bounding box; only the $3|\Omega_d|$ components inside the box are registered as inputs on the reverse-mode automatic-differentiation tape. The state-space machinery of the discrete adjoint, including the ILU preconditioner, GMRES Krylov basis, and the full-domain residual tape, remains unchanged and sets a memory floor that localisation cannot reduce below.

What would settle it

Take the optimised forcing $f_c$, evaluate $\int_{\Omega_d}|\nabla\cdot f_c|^2\,\mathrm{d}V$, and repeat the pressure-Poisson solve with and without $\nabla\cdot f_c$ as a source; if the two pressure fields differ appreciably, the recovered pressure is not determined by the corrected velocity alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a momentum-forcing correction in the RANS equations, optimised only inside a static subdomain around the body and near wake, reproduces the full-domain discrete-adjoint assimilation of three-component mean velocity data from 12 stereo-PIV cross-sectional planes. In the body-wake case, with 12.5% of the mesh cells, the objective-function convergence, plane-by-plane $L^1$ velocity mismatch, spatial distribution of the forcing, and symmetry-plane mean flow all match the global case, while peak memory drops from 441.87 GB to 254.89 GB, that is, 58% of the global footprint. The paper also reports that an upstream-only box gives the largest memory saving, down to 36.2% of global, but that configuration converges to a higher mismatch and fails to produce the required wake correction, while the downstream-only box is intermediate. From the assimilated fields, the asymmetric primary recirculation bubble is recovered with two tilted eddy centres like the experiment, the Reynolds shear stress is brought closer to experimental peaks, and the mean pressure field is argued to be consistent with in-plane vorticity structure because the corrective forcing is assumed divergence-free.

Load-bearing premise

The pressure-consistency argument assumes the optimised corrective forcing is divergence-free, but nothing in the optimisation enforces that and the paper does not verify it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The body-wake localisation case achieves the same integrated velocity mismatch, the same spatial forcing distribution, and the same symmetry-plane mean flow as the full-domain case while using 58% of peak memory.
  • Upstream-only localisation is ineffective because corrections cannot convect to the measurement planes, so the control subdomain must overlap both the model surface and the near-wake data region.
  • Twelve sparse cross-stream planes are enough to recover the asymmetric, three-dimensional primary recirculation bubble and to push the Reynolds shear stress toward experimental levels.
  • Sparse coverage that stops before the primary recirculation region ends, as in the 3-plane case, yields a qualitatively weaker wake recovery, so data planes should extend at least to the end of the bubble.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step is to choose the localisation subdomain from the adjoint sensitivity field itself, for instance by keeping cells where sensitivity exceeds a threshold, which would remove the need for manual box selection.
  • Because localisation cannot shrink the state-space memory floor, pairing it with a coarse-grid adjoint or dual-mesh strategy would attack the dominant remaining overhead, a direction the paper itself lists as future work.
  • The data-efficiency trend implies a practical sensor-placement rule: place measurement planes through the recirculation bubble and its closure rather than through the smooth far wake, and rank plane positions by predicted adjoint sensitivity.
  • The unresolved solenoidality of $f_c$ suggests a testable improvement: add a divergence-free projection or penalty to the optimisation and check whether the pressure-vorticity correlations sharpen.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar) framework for reconstructing the time-averaged flow around a vehicle-like bluff body at Re = 5.64×10^5, using 12 planes of three-component stereoscopic PIV data. The authors solve the RANS equations with the Spalart–Allmaras model and optimise a momentum forcing term via a discrete adjoint implemented in DAFoam. Their methodological contribution is 'adjoint localisation', which restricts the control variable to a user-defined subdomain. They compare global, upstream, body-wake, and downstream localisation cases, finding that the body-wake case (about 12% of control cells) closely matches the global reconstruction in L1-norm misfit, forcing-field structure, and mean-flow topology, while reducing peak memory by roughly 42%; the upstream case achieves a 64% reduction but degrades fidelity. They also assess derived quantities not used in the fit (Reynolds shear stress, mean pressure) and study data efficiency by progressively removing measurement planes.

Significance. If the memory-reduction claim is substantiated, the paper offers a practically important step for discrete-adjoint 3DVar on fine meshes, since memory rather than optimisation is often the bottleneck. The authors deserve credit for a genuine out-of-sample check: the Reynolds shear stress is not part of the velocity objective function, so its improvement is not built in by construction. The plane-by-plane L1 norms, forcing-field comparisons, and reconstructions of the recirculation bubble topology provide useful physical evidence for the body-wake case. The data-efficiency study, including the finding that coverage must extend to the end of the primary recirculation bubble, is a useful practical guideline. However, the central efficiency claim is currently undermined by an internal inconsistency in the reported peak-memory figures: the stated mechanism predicts nearly identical savings for the upstream and body-wake cases, yet the reported savings differ by about 95 GB. This issue must be resolved before the paper's headline conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.2, Table 5] The reported peak memories for the upstream (160.18 GB, ratio 0.362) and body-wake (254.89 GB, ratio 0.577) cases are inconsistent with the stated memory-saving mechanism. The text says the saving arises solely from reducing the number of registered AD inputs from 3N_Omega to 3N_Omega_l, and that the dominant stored quantities (the ILU preconditioner, GMRES Krylov basis, and full-domain AD tape) are independent of the choice of Omega_l. Since Table 4 gives N_l/N_Omega = 0.126 and 0.125 for the two cases, these cases should exhibit nearly identical memory footprints. The text attributes the difference to the upstream region lying in a lower mesh-density part of the domain, but that contradicts the asserted independence of the fixed memory floor from the localisation geometry; per-control-cell seed storage is also independent of cell density. This discrepancy affects both the 64% and 42% savings figures, which are the paper's central efficiency claims, and needs to be resolved either by a revised memory model that accounts for the location of Omega_l or by direct measurements of the floor versus control-input contributions.
  2. [Abstract and §9] The abstract claims that 'restricting the control variable to 12% of the full control space yields a maximum reduction in peak memory of 64%, while producing assimilated fields of comparable fidelity.' The 64% reduction is achieved by the upstream localisation case, but §6.2 and Fig. 10 show that this case converges to a substantially higher objective value, and Fig. 11 shows consistently higher L1 norms than the global case. Comparable fidelity is demonstrated only for the body-wake case, which saves approximately 42%, not 64%. The abstract and conclusion should associate each memory saving with the corresponding fidelity level, and avoid implying that the 64% saving is accompanied by comparable fidelity.
  3. [§7.2] The pressure-consistency argument rests on the assertion that 'since f_c is divergence-free, it acts as a solenoidal body force... and does not contribute to the pressure Poisson solve.' No constraint enforcing div(f_c)=0 is described in the optimisation formulation of §2 or §6, and no numerical verification of this property is reported. If f_c is not divergence-free, it contributes to the pressure equation, and the statement that the recovered pressure is determined entirely by the corrected velocity does not follow. The authors should either demonstrate that the discrete forcing is divergence-free by construction, provide a numerical check of div(f_c), or soften the claim to a qualitative consistency argument based on the vorticity correlation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 6] The Plane 3 baseline row reports the same minimum and maximum values (-0.0164 and 0.0120) as the Plane 2 baseline row, which is likely a copy-paste error. If correct values differ, the comparison in the text ('peak magnitudes roughly half those of the experiment on Plane 3') should be updated.
  2. [Eq. (2.4)] The momentum equation in (2.4) appears to be missing the '= 0' at the end; please check the equation formatting.
  3. [§6.2] The phrase 'in this chapter' appears several times (e.g., 'adopted for all assimilation cases in this chapter'); this should be 'paper' or 'section' for a journal article.
  4. [Figures 19–20] The term 'in-plane vorticity' is used to mean vorticity whose vector lies in the y–z plane, but this phrasing is confusing because the rotation it describes occurs out of the plane. A clearer wording would be 'out-of-plane vorticity components' or 'vorticity components normal to the measurement-plane axes'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the Reynolds shear stress and pressure checks are genuine out-of-sample predictions, with only minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The core derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs. The objective function (2.5) and its regularised form (2.7) fit only the three mean velocity components on the twelve PIV planes; neither the Reynolds shear stress nor the mean pressure appears in the objective or in the regularisation term. The Reynolds shear stress comparison (Section 7.2, Figure 18) is therefore an out-of-sample check: it is computed from the Boussinesq relation using the model eddy viscosity, which is not directly fitted. The pressure consistency argument (Section 7.2) relies on an unverified assertion that the optimised corrective forcing f_c is divergence-free; this is a correctness caveat, not a circular reduction, because the pressure is nonetheless not a fitted quantity. The adjoint-localisation memory comparison (Section 6.2, Table 5) is measured against the global case on the same data, and the efficiency claim is independent of the fidelity claim; the internal inconsistency in Table 5 is a credibility/correctness issue, not circularity. Self-citations to Cadambi Padmanaban et al. (2026a,b) appear in the introduction and conclusion as motivation or explanatory mechanism, but the current paper uses its own experimental dataset and its own global-case reference, so no load-bearing argument depends on those self-citations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or definition is imported from the authors' prior work to force the present result. Consequently, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The main free parameters are the regularisation weight, the manually selected localisation boxes, and the data processing choices. The most fragile assumption is the unverified divergence-free property of the forcing field, which underpins the pressure-consistency interpretation.

free parameters (4)
  • Regularisation weight λ = 5 × 10⁻⁵
    Chosen by L-curve analysis (Appendix A) and applied to all assimilation cases. It controls the smoothness of the optimised forcing field.
  • Localisation bounding boxes = Coordinates in Table 4 (upstream, body-wake, downstream)
    User-defined a priori based on physical reasoning. The choice of subdomain strongly affects reconstruction quality and memory savings.
  • Data downsampling grid spacing = ≈12 mm × 12 mm
    Set to match the computational grid spacing; affects the spatial resolution of the reference data used in the assimilation.
  • Γ₁ eddy-centre threshold and radius = Threshold ≈0.8, radius 0.08 Lx
    Used in Section 7.1 to identify dominant eddy centres for comparing the bubble topology; a manually chosen criterion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption RANS equations with the Boussinesq hypothesis and the Spalart-Allmaras model provide a valid baseline closure for the mean flow.
    Invoked in Section 2.1; the entire assimilation framework assumes the mean flow can be represented by this model plus a corrective forcing.
  • domain assumption The discrete adjoint gradients computed by DAFoam are correct for the discretised RANS equations.
    The optimisation relies on reverse-mode AD within DAFoam; the paper does not independently verify the adjoint gradients against finite differences.
  • domain assumption The stereo PIV mean-velocity fields from Midya & Symon (2025) are converged and accurate after folding and downsampling.
    Used as ground truth for the objective function; no uncertainty quantification is reported for the experimental data.
  • ad hoc to paper The optimised corrective forcing f_c is divergence-free.
    Assumed in Section 7.2 to argue the pressure field is independent of f_c. No constraint enforcing div(f_c)=0 is described and no numerical check is provided.
  • domain assumption Spanwise symmetry about the x-y plane at z*=0 permits a half-domain simulation and symmetric folding of the experimental data.
    Used in Section 3.3 and Section 4; the model geometry is symmetric about this plane, and the experimental data are folded accordingly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Efficient three-dimensional variational data assimilation of multi-plane PIV data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W63ATWXH

@misc{pith2026260807469,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Efficient three-dimensional variational data assimilation of multi-plane PIV data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W63ATWXH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07469}
}
abstract

We perform three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVar) using a discrete adjoint approach to optimise the time-averaged momentum equations. The experimental data consist of sparse stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements collected along $12$ cross-stream planes in the wake of a vehicle-like bluff body at a Reynolds number $Re_L = 5.64 \times 10^5$ based on the streamwise body length. Adjoint localisation is proposed and implemented to reduce the memory footprint of the discrete adjoint method for spatially-varying control variables in 3DVar by confining the control variable space to a user-defined subdomain. Restricting the control variable to $12$ % of the full control space yields a maximum reduction in peak memory of $64$ %, while producing assimilated fields of comparable fidelity with respect to mean velocity and the optimised momentum forcing field. The localised adjoint case improves upon the baseline Spalart--Allmaras turbulence model and recovers the correct asymmetric topology of the complex three-dimensional (3D) recirculation bubble. The assimilated Reynolds shear stress agrees well with the experiment, and the assimilated mean pressure is shown to be physically consistent when correlated with the in-plane vorticity fields. A data efficiency study is also performed, in which the number of planes provided for assimilation is progressively reduced, demonstrating that the data coverage must extend at least to the end of the primary recirculation bubble to adequately constrain the near-wake dynamics. The efficiency that adjoint localisation affords is crucial for assimilating sparse, experimental data for 3D separated flows on fine meshes that can tackle industrial problems of interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07469 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Front (– plane) and back (– plane) views of the multi-wake model. Camera 1 Camera 2 Fixed dual pulse laser S1 S2 100 mm Plane1 Plane2 Plane3 Movable platform Subplanes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental setup for stereo PIV of the multi-wake model. by 100 mm, beginning 11 mm downstream of the rear face of the body. The free-stream velocity is ∞ = 10 ms−1 , giving a Reynolds number based on the streamwise body length of = 5.64 × 105 . The normalised streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise velocity components are defined as ∗ = /∞, ∗ = /∞, and ∗ = /∞, respectively, where , , and are the dimensional mean ve… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (From left to right) Mean streamwise, wall-normal and spanwise components of velocity in the wake of the model along (a) Plane 2 and (b) Plane 10. See table 1 for the streamwise locations of the measurement planes. (2025) for details). The identical camera specifications yield individual FOVs measuring 448 mm in and 405 mm in . The flow is seeded with smoke particles generated by a fog machine with a nominal particl… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (22 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Data processing pipeline applied as a post-processing step to the experimental mean velocity fields, illustrated using the mean streamwise velocity component on Plane 2. (From left to right) Raw: the mean velocity field at full resolution, with the solid black line ind…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Computational domain for the half-body configuration, with dimensions shown along the streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise directions. The domain boundaries are indicated as follows: symmetry plane, inlet, outlet, top face, side face. Inlet Outlet Symmetry, top & side…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the mean streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise velocity components between the baseline SA model and the experiment on (a) Plane 2 and (b) Plane 10. Results are presented as butterfly plots, where the left half shows the baseline fields reflected about th…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 1 norm per measurement plane, computed between the baseline SA model and the experimental data using (5.1), evaluated separately for each of the three mean velocity components ( ∗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic of the adjoint localisation procedure. The full computational grid and the localised subdomain , defined by a rectangular bounding box with corners (min, min, min) and (max, max, max), are shown. The momentum forcing f is restricted to cells within . gradient…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Schematic of the localisation cases considered in this chapter, shown as wireframe representations of the computational mesh. The full grid ( ) and the localised grid ( ) are shown in each panel. (a) Global case, where ≡ . (b) Upstream localised case, where covers the …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Convergence of the normalised objective function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 1 norm of the velocity misfit between the assimilated fields and the experimental reference data, decomposed by velocity component and shown for each measurement plane. Results are shown for the baseline and the four cases: global, upstream localised, body-wake locali…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Streamwise component of the corrective forcing , on the – symmetry plane for the global and three localised cases. The fields are interpolated onto a common regular grid, and a single colour scale, symmetric about zero, is shared across all four panels. The localised …
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Mean streamwise velocity /∞ on the – symmetry plane for the global and three localised cases. The dashed line denotes the = 0 isoline of the respective case, marking the boundary of the recirculation bubble. The body outline is shown in white. Case / Peak memory (GB) …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of the mean streamwise, wall-normal, and spanwise velocity components between the body-wake assimilated and the experiment on (a) Plane 2 and (b) Plane 10. Plotting format similar to figure 6. upstream of the model and computed using ParaView’s Stream Trace…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Isometric view of mean velocity streamlines in the wake of the multi-wake model, coloured by the normalised streamwise velocity ∗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Mean velocity streamlines coloured by the normalised streamwise velocity ∗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Mean streamwise velocity ∗ on the – symmetry plane at ∗ = 0 for the experiment (top), baseline SA model (middle) and the body-wake assimilated case (bottom). The dashed line denotes the ∗ = 0 isoline delineating the primary recirculation bubble, and the filled green c…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Comparison of the Reynolds shear stress ′ ′/2 ∞ between the baseline SA model, the body-wake assimilated field, and the experiment on (a) Plane 2 and (b) Plane 3. In both panels, the right half of the butterfly plot corresponds to the experiment and the left half to t…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Assimilated fields on Plane 2 in the near wake. Each subplot presents the mean pressure coefficient on the left half and a vorticity component on the right half: wall-normal vorticity ∗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Assimilated fields on Plane 3 in the near wake. Each subplot presents the mean pressure coefficient on the left half and a vorticity component on the right half: wall-normal vorticity ∗ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Plane-by-plane 1 norm of the mean velocity field comparing the baseline SA model and the body￾wake assimilated cases with progressively reduced measurement data. The stacked bars show the individual contributions of , , and to the total 1 norm. The green gradient deno…
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Mean streamwise velocity ∗ on Plane 10 ( ∗ = 1.041), which lies downstream of all input planes in every sparse case. Each panel compares a sparse assimilation case (left half) with the full 12-plane reference (right half) in a butterfly plot format. The panels show pr…
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Reynolds shear stress ′ ′/2 ∞ on Plane 3–6 comparing sparse data assimilation cases with the full 12-plane reference in a butterfly plot format. In each panel, the left half shows the sparse case and the right half shows the 12-plane reference. The columns correspond …
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: L-curve analysis showing the trade-off between the residual and regularisation norms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Effect of regularisation on the assimilated forcing field for the global control variable, shown on the symmetry plane ∗ = 0. Left column: streamwise component , /2 ∞. Right column: wall-normal component , /2 ∞. Top row: assimilation without regularisation ( = 0). Bot…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

229 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics , author=. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  2. [2]

    A simplicial algorithm for concave programming , author=. Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Bussiness Administration , year=

  3. [3]

    The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches , author=. Theor. Comput. Fluid. Dyn. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  4. [4]

    Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations , author=. J. Comput. Phys. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  5. [5]

    Mean flow data assimilation based on physics-informed neural networks , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  6. [6]

    Turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural networks for mean-flow reconstruction , author=. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  7. [7]

    Data-Centric Eng

    Mean flow reconstruction of unsteady flows using physics-informed neural networks , author=. Data-Centric Eng. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  8. [8]

    2018 , publisher=

    Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide , author=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

Show all 229 references
  1. [9]

    Three-dimensional

    Barkley, Dwight and Henderson, Ronald D , journal=. Three-dimensional. 1996 , publisher=

    1996

  2. [10]

    Two-and three-dimensional wake transitions of a

    Gupta, Siddharth and Zhao, Jisheng and Sharma, Atul and Agrawal, Amit and Hourigan, Kerry and Thompson, Mark C , journal=. Two-and three-dimensional wake transitions of a. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  3. [11]

    Instantaneous planar pressure determination from

    De Kat, R and Van Oudheusden, BW , journal=. Instantaneous planar pressure determination from. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  4. [12]

    Data-Centric Engineering , volume=

    Mixed data-source transfer learning for a turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural network , author=. Data-Centric Engineering , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  5. [13]

    Physics-informed neural networks for enhancing medical flow magnetic resonance imaging: Artifact correction and mean pressure and

    Villi. Physics-informed neural networks for enhancing medical flow magnetic resonance imaging: Artifact correction and mean pressure and. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  6. [14]

    Low-order modeling and sensor-based prediction of stalled airfoils at moderate

    Carter, Douglas W and Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram , journal=. Low-order modeling and sensor-based prediction of stalled airfoils at moderate. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  7. [15]

    Proceedings of the 14th UK Conference on Wind Engineering: University of Southampton , year=

    Towards passive scalar reconstruction using data assimilation , author=. Proceedings of the 14th UK Conference on Wind Engineering: University of Southampton , year=

  8. [16]

    Turbulent mean flow estimation with state observer assimilation of velocity measurements in

    Marquet, Olivier and Mons, Vincent and Zauner, Markus and Leclaire, Benjamin , booktitle=. Turbulent mean flow estimation with state observer assimilation of velocity measurements in

  9. [17]

    A tale of two airfoils: resolvent-based modelling of an oscillator versus an amplifier from an experimental mean , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  10. [18]

    Four-dimensional variational data assimilation of a turbulent jet for super-temporal-resolution reconstruction , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  11. [19]

    An aerodynamic design optimization framework using a discrete adjoint approach with

    He, Ping and Mader, Charles A and Martins, Joaquim RRA and Maki, Kevin J , journal=. An aerodynamic design optimization framework using a discrete adjoint approach with. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  12. [20]

    2005 , publisher=

    Gill, Philip E and Murray, Walter and Saunders, Michael A , journal=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  13. [21]

    Adjoint methods for shape optimization , author=. Optim. Comput. Fluid Dyn. , pages=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  14. [22]

    2020 , publisher=

    He, Ping and Mader, Charles A and Martins, Joaquim RRA and Maki, Kevin J , journal=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  15. [23]

    Tellus A: Dyn

    Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects , author=. Tellus A: Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  16. [24]

    Worldwide Operations , volume=

    Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents , author=. Worldwide Operations , volume=

  17. [25]

    Viscous Phenomena Affecting High-Life Systems and Suggestions for Future

    Meredith, PT , journal=. Viscous Phenomena Affecting High-Life Systems and Suggestions for Future

  18. [26]

    Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles

    Hucho, W and Sovran, G. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles. Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 1993

    1993

  19. [27]

    Turbulent flows , author=. Meas. Sci. Technol. , volume=

  20. [28]

    ACM Trans

    High-Performance Derivative Computations using CoDiPack , author =. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. , volume =. 2019 , date =

    2019

  21. [29]

    A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , author=. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  22. [30]

    Spalart, P. R. , title =. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow , volume =

  23. [31]

    A multigrid/ensemble

    Moldovan, Gabriel and Lehnasch, Guillaume and Cordier, Laurent and Meldi, Marcello , journal=. A multigrid/ensemble. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  24. [32]

    Three-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation of Limited Experimental Data , booktitle =

  25. [33]

    Essai sur la th

    Boussinesq, Joseph Valentin , journal =. Essai sur la th

  26. [34]

    Spalart, P. R. , title =. Prog. Aerosop. Sci. , volume =

  27. [35]

    Schmitt, F. G. , title =. Comptes Rendus M\'ecanique , volume =

  28. [36]

    Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics , author=. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  29. [37]

    What color is your

    Gebremedhin, Assefaw Hadish and Manne, Fredrik and Pothen, Alex , journal=. What color is your. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  30. [38]

    Data assimilation for turbulent mean flow and scalar fields with anisotropic formulation , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  31. [39]

    To stall-cell or not to stall-cell: Variational data assimilation of 3

    Cadambi Padmanaban, Uttam and Thompson, Craig and Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram and Symon, Sean , year=. To stall-cell or not to stall-cell: Variational data assimilation of 3. 2604.27680 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Surface and flow field measurements on the faith hill model , author=. 50th

  33. [41]

    Data augmented turbulence modeling for three-dimensional separation flows , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  34. [42]

    Efficient assimilation of sparse data into

    Brenner, Oliver and Piroozmand, Pasha and Jenny, Patrick , journal=. Efficient assimilation of sparse data into. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  35. [43]

    Numerical sensitivity analysis for aerodynamic optimization: A survey of approaches , author=. Comput. Fluids , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  36. [44]

    30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit , pages=

    A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows , author=. 30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit , pages=

  37. [45]

    The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , author=. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  38. [46]

    Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  39. [47]

    A data-assimilation method for

    Foures, Dimitry P G and Dovetta, Nicolas and Sipp, Denis and Schmid, Peter J , journal=. A data-assimilation method for. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  40. [48]

    Data assimilation of mean velocity from 2

    Symon, Sean and Dovetta, Nicolas and McKeon, Beverley J and Sipp, Denis and Schmid, Peter J , journal=. Data assimilation of mean velocity from 2. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  41. [49]

    Novel approach to nonlinear/non-

    Gordon, Neil J and Salmond, David J and Smith, Adrian FM , booktitle=. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-. 1993 , organization=

    1993

  42. [50]

    Proceedings of the 2nd US-Japan joint seminar on statistical time series analysis , volume=

    A Monte Carlo filtering and smoothing method for non-Gaussian nonlinear state space models , author=. Proceedings of the 2nd US-Japan joint seminar on statistical time series analysis , volume=

  43. [51]

    Wall shear stress measurement using a zero-displacement floating-element balance , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  44. [52]

    Wall-drag measurements of smooth-and rough-wall turbulent boundary layers using a floating element , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  45. [53]

    Three-dimensional low-frequency dynamics of a turbulent separation bubble , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  46. [54]

    Mean-flow data assimilation based on minimal correction of turbulence models: Application to turbulent high

    Franceschini, Lucas and Sipp, Denis and Marquet, Olivier , journal=. Mean-flow data assimilation based on minimal correction of turbulence models: Application to turbulent high. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  47. [55]

    Data assimilation of RANS turbulence model parameters using pressure measurements on a 3

    Hanaki, Takaaki and Ichinose, Yasuo and Hamada, Tatsuya and Ohashi, Kunihide , journal=. Data assimilation of RANS turbulence model parameters using pressure measurements on a 3. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  48. [56]

    Uncertainty quantification in particle image velocimetry , author=. Meas. Sci. Technol. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  49. [57]

    Comparison of different data-assimilation approaches to augment

    Cato, Arthur Shiniti and Volpiani, Pedro Stefanin and Mons, Vincent and Marquet, Olivier and Sipp, Denis , journal=. Comparison of different data-assimilation approaches to augment. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  50. [58]

    Fluid Dyn

    Numerical simulation of real-world flows , author=. Fluid Dyn. Res. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  51. [59]

    A variational data assimilation approach for sparse velocity reference data in coarse

    Brenner, Oliver and Plogmann, Justin and Piroozmand, Pasha and Jenny, Patrick , journal=. A variational data assimilation approach for sparse velocity reference data in coarse. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  52. [60]

    Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  53. [61]

    Robust experimental data assimilation for the

    Aulakh, Deepinder Jot Singh and Yang, Xiang and Maulik, Romit , journal=. Robust experimental data assimilation for the. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  54. [62]

    Vortex shedding of an airfoil at low

    Yarusevych, Serhiy and Boutilier, Michael SH , journal=. Vortex shedding of an airfoil at low

  55. [63]

    Vortex shedding and shear-layer instability of wing at low-

    Huang, Rong F and Lin, Chih L , journal=. Vortex shedding and shear-layer instability of wing at low-

  56. [64]

    Machine learning-augmented turbulence modeling for

    Volpiani, Pedro Stefanin and Meyer, Morten and Franceschini, Lucas and Dandois, Julien and Renac, Florent and Martin, Emeric and Marquet, Olivier and Sipp, Denis , journal=. Machine learning-augmented turbulence modeling for. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  57. [65]

    A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques , author=. Comput. Phys. , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  58. [66]

    Data assimilation and linear analysis with turbulence modelling: application to airfoil stall flows with

    Mons, Vincent and Vervynck, Arthur and Marquet, Olivier , journal=. Data assimilation and linear analysis with turbulence modelling: application to airfoil stall flows with. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  59. [67]

    2015 , publisher=

    Aerodynamics of wind turbines , author=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  60. [68]

    Wind Energy Sci

    A double-multiple streamtube model for vertical axis wind turbines of arbitrary rotor loading , author=. Wind Energy Sci. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  61. [69]

    The effect of permeability on the flow structure of porous square cylinders , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  62. [70]

    An analytical blockage correction model for high-solidity turbines , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  63. [71]

    A two-permeability approach for assessing flow properties in metal foam , author=. J. Porous Mater. , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  64. [72]

    2020 , publisher=

    Ferreira, M Aguiar and Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram , journal=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  65. [73]

    Perforation effects on the wake dynamics of normal flat plates , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  66. [74]

    Porous cylinder arrays for optimal wake and drag characteristics , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  67. [75]

    Vortex shedding behind porous flat plates normal to the flow , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  68. [76]

    Wake characteristics of two-dimensional perforated plates normal to an air-stream , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 1971 , publisher=

    1971

  69. [77]

    Influence of seagrasses on water quality in shallow regions of the lower Chesapeake Bay , author=. J. Coast. Res. , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  70. [78]

    Mechanism of reduction of aeroacoustic sound by porous material: comparative study of microscopic and macroscopic models , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  71. [79]

    Drag reduction of circular cylinders by porous coating on the leeward side , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  72. [80]

    Urban flood modeling with porous shallow-water equations: A case study of model errors in the presence of anisotropic porosity , author=. J. Hydrol. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  73. [81]

    Nudging-based data assimilation of the turbulent flow around a square cylinder , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  74. [82]

    Development of a generalizable data-driven turbulence model: Conditioned field inversion and symbolic regression , author=. AIAA J. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  75. [83]

    jl , author=

    Interpretable machine learning for science with PySR and SymbolicRegression. jl , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01582 , year=

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Field Inversion and Physics-Driven-Classification Modeling for Correcting Multimechanism Separated Flows , author=. AIAA J. , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  77. [85]

    Turbulent dispersion of a passive scalar in a smooth-wall turbulent boundary layer , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  78. [86]

    Physics-informed neural networks for passive scalar emission and transport , author=. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  79. [87]

    Enhancing RANS turbulence modeling for rectangular cylinders using data assimilation and machine learning , author=. Comput. Fluids , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  80. [88]

    An adjoint-based Bayesian framework for the quantification of non-parametric uncertainties in

    Casanova, M and Mons, V and Volpiani, PS and Marquet, O and Sipp, D and Lesshafft, L , year=. An adjoint-based Bayesian framework for the quantification of non-parametric uncertainties in

  81. [89]

    Reconstruction of unsteady viscous flows using data assimilation schemes , author=. J. Comput. Phys. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  82. [90]

    Science and statistics , author=. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  83. [91]

    Monthly Weather Review , volume=

    An operational objective analysis system , author=. Monthly Weather Review , volume=

  84. [92]

    Monthly Weather Review , volume=

    A global three-dimensional multivariate statistical interpolation scheme , author=. Monthly Weather Review , volume=

  85. [93]

    Linear and nonlinear sensor placement strategies for mean-flow reconstruction via data assimilation , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  86. [94]

    A trivariate

    Alfeld, Peter , journal=. A trivariate. 1984 , publisher=

    1984

  87. [95]

    State observer data assimilation for

    Saredi, Edoardo and Ramesh, Nikhilesh Tumuluru and Sciacchitano, Andrea and Scarano, Fulvio , journal=. State observer data assimilation for. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  88. [96]

    A data assimilation methodology for reconstructing turbulent flows around aircraft , author=. J. Comput. Phys. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  89. [97]

    A reduced order model based on

    Meldi, Marcello and Poux, Alexandre , journal=. A reduced order model based on. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  90. [98]

    Approach for uncertainty of turbulence modeling based on data assimilation technique , author=. Comput. Fluids , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  91. [99]

    Turbulent mean flow prediction in impinging jets using data assimilation methods , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  92. [100]

    Minimization of divergence error in volumetric velocity measurements and implications for turbulence statistics , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  93. [101]

    Ensemble

    Labahn, Jeffrey W and Wu, Hao and Harris, Shaun R and Coriton, Bruno and Frank, Jonathan H and Ihme, Matthias , journal=. Ensemble. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  94. [102]

    Data assimilation for modeling cavitation bubble dynamics , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  95. [103]

    Materials Today: Proceedings , year=

    A review of data assimilation techniques: Applications in engineering and agriculture , author=. Materials Today: Proceedings , year=

  96. [104]

    A data assimilation model for turbulent flows using continuous adjoint formulation , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  97. [105]

    Bayesian optimisation of RANS simulation with ensemble-based variational method in convergent-divergent channel , author=. J. Turbul. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  98. [106]

    A data assimilation model for wall pressure-driven mean flow reconstruction , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  99. [107]

    The ensemble

    Evensen, Geir , journal=. The ensemble. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  100. [108]

    A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems , author=. J. Basic Eng. , volume=

  101. [109]

    IEEE T MIL ELECTRON , volume=

    Observing the state of a linear system , author=. IEEE T MIL ELECTRON , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

    1964

  102. [110]

    Numerical experiment of measurement-integrated simulation to reproduce turbulent flows with feedback loop to dynamically compensate the solution using real flow information , author=. Comput. Fluids , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  103. [111]

    JSME Int

    Fundamental study of hybrid wind tunnel integrating numerical simulation and experiment in analysis of flow field , author=. JSME Int. J. B , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  104. [112]

    Numerical realization for analysis of real flows by integrating computation and measurement , author=. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  105. [113]

    Calculation of the Pressure Field for Turbulent Flow around a Surface-Mounted Cube Using the

    Pallas, Nikolaos-Petros and Bouris, Demetri , journal=. Calculation of the Pressure Field for Turbulent Flow around a Surface-Mounted Cube Using the. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  106. [114]

    Effect of feedback data rate in

    Yamagata, Takayuki and Hayase, Toshiyuki and Higuchi, Hiroshi , journal=. Effect of feedback data rate in. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  107. [115]

    Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: what next? , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  108. [116]

    Computational aerodynamics development and outlook , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  109. [117]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character , volume=. 1926 , publisher=

    1926

  110. [118]

    XXIX. An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels , author=. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society of London , number=. 1883 , publisher=

  111. [119]

    Numerical simulation of three-dimensional homogeneous isotropic turbulence , author=. Phys. Rev. Letters , volume=. 1972 , publisher=

    1972

  112. [120]

    A perspective on the state of aerospace computational fluid dynamics technology , author=. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  113. [121]

    Optimization of parameter values in the turbulence model aided by data assimilation , author=. AIAA J. , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  114. [122]

    1922 , publisher=

    Weather prediction by numerical process , author=. 1922 , publisher=

    1922

  115. [123]

    The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large

    Kolmogorov, Andrei Nikolaevich , journal=. The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large. 1991 , publisher=

    1991

  116. [124]

    2000 , publisher=

    Turbulent flows , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  117. [125]

    Turbulent boundary layers around wing sections up to

    Vinuesa, Ricardo and Negi, Prabal Singh and Atzori, M and Hanifi, Ardeshir and Henningson, Dan S and Schlatter, Philipp , journal=. Turbulent boundary layers around wing sections up to. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  118. [126]

    Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman's estimates revisited , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  119. [127]

    Direct numerical simulation of the flow around a wing section at moderate

    Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad and Vinuesa, Ricardo and Schlatter, Philipp and Hanifi, Ardeshir and Henningson, Dan S , journal=. Direct numerical simulation of the flow around a wing section at moderate. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  120. [128]

    Large-eddy simulation of airfoil flow near stall condition at

    Asada, Kengo and Kawai, Soshi , journal=. Large-eddy simulation of airfoil flow near stall condition at. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  121. [129]

    Wall-Resolved Large-Eddy Simulation of Near-Stall Airfoil Flow at

    Tamaki, Yoshiharu and Kawai, Soshi , journal=. Wall-Resolved Large-Eddy Simulation of Near-Stall Airfoil Flow at. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  122. [130]

    Mechanical Engineering Reviews , volume=

    Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions , author=. Mechanical Engineering Reviews , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  123. [131]

    On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion , author=

    IV. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion , author=. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of london.(a.) , number=. 1895 , publisher=

  124. [132]

    1998 , publisher=

    Turbulence modeling for CFD , author=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  125. [133]

    Improved two-equation k-omega turbulence models for aerodynamic flows , author=

  126. [134]

    Assessment of

    Sporschill, Gustave and Billard, Flavien and Mallet, Michel and Manceau, Remi and B. Assessment of. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  127. [135]

    Computing in Science & Engineering , volume=

    Realizing the Vision of CFD in 2030 , author=. Computing in Science & Engineering , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  128. [136]

    Data assimilation for atmospheric, oceanic and hydrologic applications , pages=

    Data assimilation for numerical weather prediction: a review , author=. Data assimilation for atmospheric, oceanic and hydrologic applications , pages=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  129. [137]

    State estimator of flow as an integrated computational method with the feedback of online experimental measurement , author=. J. Fluids Eng. , volume=

  130. [138]

    Unsteady

    Suzuki, Takao and Ji, Hui and Yamamoto, Fujio , journal=. Unsteady. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  131. [139]

    Unsteady

    Suzuki, Takao and Sanse, Akira and Mizushima, Takashi and Yamamoto, Fujio , journal=. Unsteady. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  132. [140]

    1988 , publisher=

    Dynamic systems control: linear systems analysis and synthesis , author=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  133. [141]

    2012 , publisher=

    Optimal control theory for infinite dimensional systems , author=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  134. [142]

    Aerodynamic design via control theory , author=. J. Sci. Comput. , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  135. [143]

    Theoretical and computational fluid dynamics , volume=

    Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier--Stokes equations , author=. Theoretical and computational fluid dynamics , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  136. [144]

    Fluid dynamics conference , pages=

    Aerodynamic design using unstructured meshes , author=. Fluid dynamics conference , pages=

  137. [145]

    38th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit , pages=

    A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization , author=. 38th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit , pages=

  138. [146]

    Flow Turbul

    An introduction to the adjoint approach to design , author=. Flow Turbul. Combust. , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  139. [147]

    7th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium , year=

    Discrete adjoint method in elsA (Part 2): Application to aerodynamic design optimisation , author=. 7th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium , year=

  140. [148]

    40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit , pages=

    elsA-An efficient object-oriented solution to CFD complexity , author=. 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit , pages=

  141. [149]

    Inflow and initial conditions for direct numerical simulation based on adjoint data assimilation , author=. J. Comput. Phys. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  142. [150]

    Optimal sensor placement for variational data assimilation of unsteady flows past a rotationally oscillating cylinder , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  143. [151]

    Flow Turbul

    Large eddy simulation requirements for the flow over periodic hills , author=. Flow Turbul. Combust. , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  144. [152]

    Incompact3d: A powerful tool to tackle turbulence problems with up to

    Laizet, Sylvain and Li, Ning , journal=. Incompact3d: A powerful tool to tackle turbulence problems with up to. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  145. [153]

    Particle image velocimetry for complex and turbulent flows , author=. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  146. [154]

    Measurement Science and Technology , volume=

    Laser Doppler anemometry: recent developments and future challenges , author=. Measurement Science and Technology , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  147. [155]

    Hot-wire anemometry , author=. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

    1976

  148. [156]

    From limited observations to the state of turbulence: Fundamental difficulties of flow reconstruction , author=. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  149. [157]

    2022 , note =

    Craig Thompson , title =. 2022 , note =

    2022

  150. [158]

    Direct Numerical Simulation of Flow over Periodic Hills up to

    Krank, Benjamin and Kronbichler, Martin and Wall, Wolfgang A , journal=. Direct Numerical Simulation of Flow over Periodic Hills up to. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  151. [159]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01065 , year=

    Turbulence model augmented physics informed neural networks for mean flow reconstruction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01065 , year=

    arXiv

  152. [160]

    Flows over periodic hills of parameterized geometries: A dataset for data-driven turbulence modeling from direct simulations , author=. Comput. Fluids , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  153. [161]

    2003 , publisher=

    Computer algebra handbook: foundations, applications, systems , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  154. [162]

    ACM Trans

    The complex-step derivative approximation , author=. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  155. [163]

    PETSc web page , author=

  156. [164]

    Data assimilation: the ensemble

    Evensen, Geir and others , volume=. Data assimilation: the ensemble. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  157. [165]

    Reduced-order

    Suzuki, Takao , journal=. Reduced-order. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  158. [166]

    Recovering turbulent flow field from local quantity measurement: turbulence modeling using ensemble-

    Deng, Zhiwen and He, Chuangxin and Wen, Xin and Liu, Yingzheng , journal=. Recovering turbulent flow field from local quantity measurement: turbulence modeling using ensemble-. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  159. [167]

    1999 , publisher=

    Numerical optimization , author=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  160. [168]

    A globally convergent primal-dual interior point method for constrained optimization , author=. Optim. Methods Softw. , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  161. [169]

    Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion , pages=

    A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , author=. Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion , pages=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  162. [170]

    Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  163. [171]

    2008 , publisher=

    Evaluating derivatives: principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  164. [172]

    2011 , publisher=

    The art of differentiating computer programs: an introduction to algorithmic differentiation , author=. 2011 , publisher=

    2011

  165. [173]

    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , volume=

    pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , author=. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  166. [174]

    On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , author=. Math. Program. , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  167. [175]

    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , volume=

    Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , author=. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  168. [176]

    Computing in Science & Engineering , volume=

    Cython: The best of both worlds , author=. Computing in Science & Engineering , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  169. [177]

    Flow over periodic hills--numerical and experimental study in a wide range of

    Breuer, Michael and Peller, Nikolaus and Rapp, Ch and Manhart, Michael , journal=. Flow over periodic hills--numerical and experimental study in a wide range of. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  170. [178]

    Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  171. [179]

    55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting , pages=

    Augmentation of turbulence models using field inversion and machine learning , author=. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting , pages=

  172. [180]

    Discovery of algebraic

    Schmelzer, Martin and Dwight, Richard P and Cinnella, Paola , journal=. Discovery of algebraic. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  173. [181]

    Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation , pages=

    The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows , author=. Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation , pages=. 1967 , publisher=

    1967

  174. [182]

    2023 , eprint=

    Robust variational data assimilation of sparse velocity reference data in RANS simulations through a divergence-free forcing term , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  175. [183]

    Linear stability analysis of turbulent mean flows based on a data-consistent

    Sarras, Konstantinos and Tayeh, Cynthia and Mons, Vincent and Marquet, Olivier , journal=. Linear stability analysis of turbulent mean flows based on a data-consistent. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  176. [184]

    Wind Energy , volume=

    Experimental and computational analysis of stall cells on rectangular wings , author=. Wind Energy , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  177. [185]

    Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling for Separated Flows Considering Nonlocal Effect , author=. AIAA J. , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  178. [186]

    Assimilating experimental data of a mean three-dimensional separated flow using physics-informed neural networks , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  179. [187]

    Attia, Ahmed and Sandu, Attia , TITLE =. Geosci. Model. Dev , VOLUME =. 2019 , NUMBER =

    2019

  180. [188]

    , author=

    OpenDA, a generic toolbox for data-assimilation in numerical modelling. , author=. 415th Biennial Conference of the Joint Numerical Sea Modelling Group , year=

  181. [189]

    2018 Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference , pages=

    STAMPS: a finite-volume solver framework for adjoint codes derived with source-transformation AD , author=. 2018 Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference , pages=

    2018

  182. [190]

    Algorithm developments for discrete adjoint methods , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  183. [191]

    New development in

    Hecht, Fr. New development in. J. Numer. Math , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  184. [192]

    Quantifying and reducing model-form uncertainties in. J. Comput. Phys , volume =. 2016 , author =

    2016

  185. [193]

    Michelén Ströfer, Carlos and Zhang, Xin-Lei and Xiao , Heng , title =

    A. Michelén Ströfer, Carlos and Zhang, Xin-Lei and Xiao , Heng , title =. Commun. Comput. Phys , year =

  186. [194]

    The Data Assimilation Research Testbed: A Community Facility

    Jeffrey Anderson and Tim Hoar and Kevin Raeder and Hui Liu and Nancy Collins and Ryan Torn and Avelino Avellano. The Data Assimilation Research Testbed: A Community Facility. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 2009

    2009

  187. [195]

    AIAA/ASME 3rd Joint Thermophysics, Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference , pages=

    Winkleman, Allen E , title=. AIAA/ASME 3rd Joint Thermophysics, Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference , pages=

  188. [196]

    and Barlow, Jewell B

    Winkelman, Allen E. and Barlow, Jewell B. , title=. AIAA J. , volume=

  189. [197]

    Two dimensional low-speed tunnel tests on the

    Moss, GF and Murdin, PM , publisher=. Two dimensional low-speed tunnel tests on the

  190. [198]

    Progress report on observations of three-dimensional flow patterns obtained during stall development on aerofoils, and on the problem of measuring two-dimensional characteristics , author=

  191. [199]

    Cellular patterns in poststall flow over unswept wings , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  192. [200]

    3rd Joint Thermophysics, Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference , pages=

    An experimental study of mushroom shaped stall cells , author=. 3rd Joint Thermophysics, Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference , pages=

  193. [201]

    Low-speed flows involving bubble separations , author=. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. , volume=. 1964 , publisher=

    1964

  194. [202]

    Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed , author=

  195. [203]

    Spanwise variation in the unsteady stalling flowfields of two-dimensional airfoil models , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  196. [204]

    35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit , pages=

    On vortical flow structures at wing stall and beyond , author=. 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit , pages=

  197. [205]

    Study of the unsteady flow features on a stalled wing , author=. AIAA J. , volume=

  198. [206]

    Measurement of three-dimensional stall cells on a two-dimensional

    Dell'Orso, Haley and Tuna, Burak A and Amitay, Michael , journal=. Measurement of three-dimensional stall cells on a two-dimensional. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  199. [207]

    Three-dimensional separation over unswept cantilevered wings at a moderate

    Neal, Jacob M and Amitay, Michael , journal=. Three-dimensional separation over unswept cantilevered wings at a moderate. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  200. [208]

    Numerical investigation of separation for airfoils at low

    Gross, Andreas and Fasel, Hermann , booktitle=. Numerical investigation of separation for airfoils at low

  201. [209]

    Criterion for spanwise spacing of stall cells , author=. AIAA J. , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  202. [210]

    Effects of a trailing-edge flap on stall cell characteristics of a

    De Voogt, Francis and Ganapathisubramani, Bharathram , journal=. Effects of a trailing-edge flap on stall cell characteristics of a. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  203. [211]

    Study of a stall cell using stereo particle image velocimetry , author=. Phys. Fluids , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  204. [212]

    Numerical study of airfoil stall cells using a very wide computational domain , author=. Comput. Fluids , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  205. [213]

    Numerical analysis on the oscillation of stall cells over a

    Liu, Dajun and Nishino, Takafumi , journal=. Numerical analysis on the oscillation of stall cells over a. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  206. [214]

    Three-dimensional variational data assimilation of separated flows using time-averaged experimental data , author=. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  207. [215]

    Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raumfahrt , year=

    A software package for sequential quadratic programming , author=. Forschungsbericht- Deutsche Forschungs- und Versuchsanstalt fur Luft- und Raumfahrt , year=

  208. [216]

    Annals of operations research , volume=

    NLPQL: A FORTRAN subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems , author=. Annals of operations research , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

    1986

  209. [217]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15980 , year=

    Assimilating rough features: A data-driven framework to infer rough wall properties from sparse experimental data , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15980 , year=

  210. [218]

    On the role of eddy viscosity in resolvent analysis of turbulent jets , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  211. [219]

    An open-source adjoint-based field inversion tool for data-driven

    Bidar, Omid and He, Ping and Anderson, Sean and Qin, Ning , booktitle=. An open-source adjoint-based field inversion tool for data-driven

  212. [220]

    2017 , publisher=

    Mendez, MA and Raiola, Marco and Masullo, Alessandro and Discetti, Stefano and Ianiro, Andrea and Theunissen, Raf and Buchlin, J-M , journal=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  213. [221]

    Interpreting multivariate data , pages=

    A brief description of natural neighbour interpolation , author=. Interpreting multivariate data , pages=. 1981 , publisher=

    1981

  214. [222]

    Effects of integral length scale variations on the stall characteristics of a wing at high free-stream turbulence conditions , author=. J. Fluid Mech. , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  215. [223]

    Combining

    Graftieaux, Laurent and Michard, Marc and Grosjean, Nathalie , journal=. Combining

  216. [224]

    Tomographic particle image velocimetry , author=. Exp. Fluids , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  217. [225]

    Experimental investigation of a high

    Midya, Samaresh and Symon, Sean , journal=. Experimental investigation of a high. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  218. [226]

    Taylor, Morgan and Lawson, John and Ganapathisubramani, Bharath , journal=

  219. [227]

    A single formula for the law of the wall , author=. J. Appl. Mech. , volume=

  220. [228]

    Data-driven

    Buchanan, Tyler and L. Data-driven. Comput. Fluids , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  221. [229]

    Wind Energy , volume=

    Geometrical characterization of stall cells on rectangular wings , author=. Wind Energy , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.