Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 128 references

Black bounce sourced by non-minimally coupled linear electrodynamics and a canonical scalar field through a thin shell at the throat

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs a family of black bounce geometries in general relativity whose bulk is supported by a canonical scalar field non-minimally coupled to linear electrodynamics, with all exotic matter confined to an infinitesimally…

desk verdict Bulk reconstruction is solid and largely checkable, but the thin-shell section contradicts its own equations and the claimed surface stress-energy does not follow; send to referees with instructions to redo the junction calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08208 v1 pith:DIFXXRBR submitted 2026-08-08 gr-qc hep-th

Ednaldo L. B. Junior , José Tarciso S. S. Junior , Francisco S. N. Lobo , Gonzalo J. Olmo , Jorde A. A. Ramos , Manuel E. Rodrigues , Luís F. Dias da Silva , Henrique A. Vieira This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.50.Kd04.70.Bw
keywords blackbounceregularholetraversablewormholethinshelllinearelectrodynamicsnon-minimalcouplingenergyconditionsnullconditionviolation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs a new family of black bounce geometries—spacetimes that interpolate between regular black holes and traversable wormholes by replacing the radial coordinate with $\Sigma(r)=\sqrt{q_m^2+r^2}$—as exact solutions of general relativity. The source is a canonical scalar field non-minimally coupled to linear electrodynamics, with interaction $W(\varphi)L(F)$ and $L(F)=F$, so the weak-field limit is ordinary Maxwell theory. The main claim is that the exotic matter required by the traversable-wormhole and singularity theorems can be confined to an infinitesimally thin shell at the throat $r=0$, while the bulk matter satisfies the null, weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions almost everywhere. This is achieved because the metric is only $C^1$ in the proper radial distance at the throat, so the Einstein tensor acquires a distributional $\delta'$-type contribution; regularising it yields a surface stress-energy tensor with $\sigma+P<0$ on the shell. If correct, the construction gives a self-consistent GR realisation of regular black holes and traversable wormholes with ordinary bulk matter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the non-minimal interaction term $W(\varphi)L(F)$ with $L_F=1$, i.e. linear electrodynamics, together with the square-root area function $\Sigma(r)=\sqrt{q_m^2+r^2}$ and the choice $\rho+p_r=b_1(r)\neq0$ encoded by the parameter $b_0$. The decisive mechanism is the regularity analysis at the throat: $B(r)\sim r^2$ near $r=0$, so the proper radial distance $\ell(r)=\int_0^r\sqrt{B(u)}\,du$ is $C^1$ but not $C^2$; the extrinsic curvature is continuous, the standard $\delta(r)$ junction term vanishes, and a $\delta'(r)$ term survives. Regularising that distributional part, following the procedure cited in Refs. [68,119], produces the surface stress-energy $\sigma=-(1/4\pi q_m)[b_0^2/(q_m^4+b_0^2)]\sqrt{A(0)}$ and $P=-\sigma/2$, whose key property is $\sigma+P<0$ whenever $A(0)>0$.

What would settle it

Compute the surface stress-energy from an explicit limiting procedure: smooth the metric over a width $\epsilon$ around $r=0$, solve the Einstein equations for that smoothed metric, and take $\epsilon\to0$. The claim is falsified if the limiting $\sigma$ and $P$ fail to match Eqs. (108)–(109), or if the limit depends on the choice of smoothing profile.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that a magnetically charged black bounce with metric functions $A(r)=1-2M/\Sigma(r)+\rho_0/\Sigma(r)^2$ and $B(r)^{-1}=A(r)(\Sigma(r)^2/r^2)(1+b_0^2/\Sigma(r)^4)$ is an exact solution of Einstein's equations sourced by a canonical scalar field ($\epsilon=1$) plus linear electrodynamics. The explicit reconstruction yields $L(F)=F$, a positive coupling function $W(\varphi)$, a scalar field $\varphi(r)=(1/\sqrt{2}\kappa)\mathrm{arcsinh}(b_0/\Sigma^2)$, and a scalar potential $V(\varphi)$. The remarkable feature is the resolution of the apparent tension with classical theorems: although the bulk energy conditions seem to be satisfied everywhere in the wormhole configuration, the throat carries a thin shell with surface density $\sigma<0$, pressure $P>0$, and $\sigma+P<0$, so the null energy condition is violated exactly where the theorems require it and nowhere else. In black-hole configurations this shell lies inside the horizon, so it is causally hidden from external observers.

Load-bearing premise

The construction stands or falls on treating the surface $r=0$, where $B(0)=0$ makes the metric degenerate in these coordinates, as a legitimate thin shell whose surface stress-energy is obtained by regularising the $\delta'$ distributional part of the Einstein tensor; if that regularisation is not valid, the energy-condition analysis does not cover the throat and the model is not a solution of general relativity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wormhole configurations in this family satisfy the null, weak, strong, and dominant energy conditions in the bulk and concentrate the NEC violation on the throat, so the traversable-wormhole and singularity theorems are upheld rather than violated.
  • The parameter $b_0$ (equivalently the throat value of the scalar field) interpolates between standard NED black bounces with bulk NEC violation ($b_0\to0$) and configurations where all exoticity sits on the shell ($b_0\gg q_m^2$).
  • Because the reconstructed electromagnetic Lagrangian is exactly $L(F)=F$, the model recovers the Maxwell weak-field limit, avoiding pathologies of non-analytic or multivalued nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangians.
  • For black-hole parameters the exotic shell is hidden behind the event horizon, so the exterior is effectively regular and non-exotic; the interior throat remains a distributional defect.
  • The Kretschmann scalar is finite everywhere, including at $r=0$, and vanishes at infinity, so the family is asymptotically flat and regular in the sense of curvature invariants.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the regularisation is profile-independent, the shell obeys the effective equation of state $P=-\sigma/2$; that relation could be tested by studying the linear stability of the throat under radial perturbations.
  • The same $C^1$-but-not-$C^2$ mechanism may explain apparent full energy-condition satisfaction in other regular black hole and wormhole models, and scanning known solutions for a $\delta'$ contribution could show whether localising exoticity to a distributional defect is generic.
  • One could try to extend the construction to rotating or dyonic configurations; the expected pattern is that a shell with $\sigma+P<0$ persists, with the exoticity still confined to the bounce surface.
  • Since $b_0$ controls how much violation is pushed from the bulk to the shell, the model suggests a quantitative measure of 'exoticity localisation' that could be compared across different black bounce constructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs static, spherically symmetric black-bounce and wormhole geometries in general relativity, with metric functions given by Eqs. (47)-(49) and matter content consisting of a canonical scalar field non-minimally coupled to linear electrodynamics. The authors reconstruct the coupling function W(phi), scalar potential V(phi), and scalar field profile, analyze the energy conditions in the bulk, and argue that the unavoidable NEC violation is confined to a thin shell at the throat r=0, with surface energy density and pressure given in Eqs. (108)-(109). The central new claim is that ordinary bulk matter supports the spacetime while the exotic matter is an infinitesimally thin distributional defect at the bounce.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would be a useful example of a black-bounce/wormhole family in which the Morris-Thorne NEC violation is localized on a thin shell while the bulk satisfies the energy conditions. The bulk algebra is largely explicit: the field equations, the reconstruction of W and V, the Kretschmann scalar, and the energy-condition inequalities are presented in detail, and the scalar field is obtained in closed form. The reconstruction procedure is reverse-engineering rather than circular, as the authors emphasize. However, the load-bearing thin-shell derivation is not sound: the extrinsic curvature is not continuous at the throat, the Lanczos term does not vanish, and Eqs. (108)-(109) are therefore unsupported. The significance of the paper depends entirely on this shell analysis, so the result is not established as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B, Eq. (106)] The two-sided limits in Eq. (106) are not correct. From Eqs. (47)-(49), near r=0 one has B(r)=C^2 r^2+O(r^4) with C^2=1/[A(0) q_m^2 (1+b_0^2/q_m^4)], A'(r)=A''(0)r+O(r^3), and Sigma'(r)=r/q_m+O(r^3). Substituting these into Eq. (105) gives K^t_t = [A''(0)/(2A(0)C)] sgn(r)+O(r) and K^theta_theta = [1/(C q_m^2)] sgn(r)+O(r). The left and right limits are opposite in sign, so the extrinsic curvature is not continuous at the throat; the values quoted in Eq. (106) are only the right-hand limits. Consequently [K_ab] is nonzero, the Lanczos term in Eq. (107) does not vanish, and the premise for invoking the delta-prime regularisation of Refs. [68,119] is absent.
  2. [Section IV.C, Eqs. (108)-(109)] Because [K_ab] is nonzero, the surface stress-energy must be computed from the standard Israel junction conditions in the proper-length coordinate. Such a computation gives sigma and P that depend on the jumps [A'] and [Sigma'], i.e., on M, rho_0, q_m, and b_0 through A(0) and C, and not on the factor b_0^2/(q_m^4+b_0^2) alone. In particular, B(0)=0 for all b_0, including b_0=0, so the claim in Section IV.D that the thin-shell contribution vanishes as b_0 goes to zero is not supported by the junction conditions. The quoted sigma and P, and the associated b_0-localization interpretation, are therefore unsupported as written.
  3. [Section IV.A] The regularity classification is coordinate-dependent and internally inconsistent. In the proper-length coordinate X = integral sqrt(B) dr, the metric takes the form ds^2 = A(X) dt^2 - dX^2 - Sigma(X)^2 dOmega^2, and since r ~ sqrt(X), the functions A(X) and Sigma(X) have finite jumps in their first derivatives at X=0. This is the standard C^0 thin-shell situation in which a delta-function (Lanczos) term appears. The statement that the metric is 'C^1 but not C^2' in the proper radial coordinate therefore does not remove the Lanczos term; if anything, it points toward the usual Israel formalism rather than a delta-prime regularisation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III.D, Eq. (95)] The expression for W(phi) appears to have an incorrect coefficient: substituting y=b_0/Sigma^2 = sinh(sqrt(2) kappa phi) into Eq. (89) gives a term -6M sqrt(b_0) sinh^{3/2}(sqrt(2) kappa phi)/(kappa^2 q_m^2), not -6 b_0 M sinh^{3/2}(sqrt(2) kappa phi)/(kappa^2 q_m^2). The two agree only for b_0=1.
  2. [Section V] The final section contains substantive astrophysical claims (ISCO shifts, photon circular orbits, magnetar QPO frequencies, Poincare surfaces of section, Fokker-Planck transport) that are not derived or referenced anywhere in the paper. These unsupported statements should be removed or replaced with a summary of the actual results.
  3. [References] Reference [108] is incomplete: it lists authors and an arXiv identifier but no title, and the arXiv number appears anomalous. This should be corrected before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No demonstrated circularity: bulk reconstruction is self-contained; thin-shell content is opaque and self-cited but not shown to be circular.

full rationale

The central bulk construction is reverse-engineering, not circularity. The paper specifies A(r), Sigma(r), and b1(r), then solves Eq. (41) for B(r), and reconstructs L, W, phi, and V from the field equations via Eqs. (20)-(26), (23), and (24). These reconstructed matter functions are outputs of the chosen metric ansatz, not inputs used to impose the energy conditions, and the solution is checked by direct substitution into the field equations. The energy conditions in Eqs. (55)-(60) and (73)-(78) are algebraic consequences of the metric; no energy condition is assumed to force the conclusions, and the parameter constraints on rho0 are selections of allowed parameter ranges, not predictions fitted to data. The action and reconstruction methodology are attributed to self-cited works [117,118], but the field equations and solution are re-derived in the present text, so the central claim has independent content. The only passage that approaches a circularity concern is Section IV.B-C, where the thin-shell stress-energy is said to follow from 'the regularisation approach of Refs. [68,119]' and is presented with 'After a straightforward but lengthy calculation' leading to Eqs. (108)-(109). This is a load-bearing, unshown derivation delegated to prior works with overlapping authorship, and it is a genuine support gap. However, the paper does not define the shell stress-energy as the input nor fit it to the Morris-Thorne outcome; it asserts it as a consequence of the geometry. Under the hard rule that circularity requires exhibiting a specific reduction by construction, this is an omitted or potentially incorrect derivation, not a demonstrated circular step. The score of 2 reflects the presence of self-citations and the opaque thin-shell regularisation, without treating that opacity as a proven circular equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central construction depends on the chosen metric ansatz, the LED constraint L_F=1, the canonical scalar assumption, and the regularisation method for the throat. The parameters M, q_m, rho_0, and b_0 are free solution parameters, not fitted constants.

free parameters (4)
  • M
    Mass parameter in the metric function A(r); sets the horizon structure. Chosen by hand for the model, not fitted to data.
  • q_m
    Magnetic charge parameter; also sets the bounce scale through the Simpson-Visser area function Sigma^2 = q_m^2 + r^2.
  • rho_0
    Charge-like parameter in A(r) = 1 - 2M/Sigma + rho_0/Sigma^2; controls the energy conditions and is chosen in plots to satisfy them.
  • b_0
    Parameter encoding the deviation from rho + p_r = 0; controls the distribution of NEC violation between bulk and thin shell. Nonzero b_0 is required for the canonical scalar reconstruction.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Static, spherically symmetric metric with Simpson-Visser area function Sigma = sqrt(q_m^2 + r^2) and A = 1 - 2M/Sigma + rho_0/Sigma^2.
    The entire construction is metric engineering around this ansatz, specified in Section III.A.
  • ad hoc to paper Linear electrodynamics constraint L_F = 1, hence L(F) = F.
    Chosen to enforce the Maxwell weak-field limit and to determine W(r) through Eq. (25). It is an input, not a derived result.
  • domain assumption Canonical scalar field, epsilon(r) = 1.
    Assumed to obtain ordinary non-phantom matter; made possible by g00 different from -1/g11, as stated in Section III.D.
  • ad hoc to paper The regularisation procedure of Refs. [68,119] correctly captures delta-prime distributional contributions for a C1-but-not-C2 metric at the throat.
    The shell stress-energy Eqs. (108)-(109) depends on this unproven regularisation; the standard Lanczos equation gives zero because the extrinsic curvature is continuous.
invented entities (1)
  • Thin shell of exotic matter at r=0 with surface energy density sigma < 0 and surface pressure P > 0
    purpose: To localize the NEC violation required by the Morris-Thorne theorem while keeping the bulk matter non-exotic.
    The shell is inferred from the lack of C2 differentiability in the proper radial coordinate and from the chosen regularisation. No independent observable is predicted beyond the model itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black bounce sourced by non-minimally coupled linear electrodynamics and a canonical scalar field through a thin shell at the throat." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DIFXXRBR

@misc{pith2026260808208,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black bounce sourced by non-minimally coupled linear electrodynamics and a canonical scalar field through a thin shell at the throat},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DIFXXRBR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08208}
}
read the original abstract

We construct a novel class of black bounce solutions within General Relativity, sourced by a canonical scalar field non-minimally coupled to linear electrodynamics, establishing a self-consistent framework in which regular black holes and traversable wormholes are supported by ordinary bulk matter, with the necessary exoticity confined to an infinitesimally thin defect at the bounce.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08208 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Behaviour of the metric function given by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Behaviour of the energy conditions. finite. Furthermore, in the asymptotic limit r → ∞, the scalar vanishes, as expected for an asymptotically flat spacetime. Taken together, these limiting behaviors con￾firm that the proposed model remains regular throughout the entire spacetime manifold. D. Reconstruction of the matter Lagrangian and potential We now present the matter content described by the LED and the scalar f… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Scalar field behavior, as described by Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Behaviour of the scalar potential V (φ), given by Eq. (96). IV. THIN-SHELL MATCHING AND RESOLUTION OF THE ENERGY CONDITION VIOLATIONS The solution presented in Sec. III possesses a remark￾able feature: when A(r) > 0, all energy conditions—with the sole exception of DEC…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [119]

    Stability of magnetic black holes in general nonlinear electrody- namics,

    K. Nomura, D. Yoshida and J. Soda, “Stability of magnetic black holes in general nonlinear electrody- namics,” Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.12, 124026 [arXiv:2004.07560 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [1]

    Magnetic solutions We now present the general solutions obtained by considering only the magnetic charge component in the Maxwell–Faraday tensor, as expressed in Eq. (12). Sub- stituting this into the Einstein field equations (8), to- gether with the metric (11) and Eqs. (12) and (13), we obtain the following components: G0 0 =κ 2T 0 0 =κ2 ϵ(r)φ′(r)2 B(r)...

  3. [2]

    Horizons We now examine the intrinsic properties of the metric function (48). The presence of horizons is determined by the conditionA(r H ) = 0, whose solution is rH =± r M± p M 2 −ρ 0 2 −q 2m.(50) The outer pair of±signs corresponds, respectively, to the horizons in our universe (r >0) and in the paral- lel universe beyond the throat (r <0). The inner p...

  4. [3]

    The black dashed vertical lines mark the positions of the horizons (inr <0 andr >0), while the yellow-shaded region indicates the interior of the horizon

    For these values, the metric function (48) describes a regular black hole configuration, with the event horizon located at approximatelyr H ∼1.2. The black dashed vertical lines mark the positions of the horizons (inr <0 andr >0), while the yellow-shaded region indicates the interior of the horizon. The solid coloured curves corre- spond to the energy con...

  5. [4]

    Forb 0 ̸= 0, the NEC violation is concen- trated at the throat

    reflects the role of the non-minimal cou- pling in generating the thin shell: whenb 0 →0, the shell contribution vanishes, and the NEC violation is dis- tributed throughout the bulk, as in the standard black bounce solutions supported solely by nonlinear electro- dynamics [119]. Forb 0 ̸= 0, the NEC violation is concen- trated at the throat. The null ener...

  6. [5]

    thin-shell wormhole

    From Eqs. (108)–(109), we obtain σ+P=− 1 8πqm b2 0 q4m +b 2 0 p A(0).(110) For a wormhole configuration,A(0)>0 (no horizon is present), and sinceb 2 0/(q4 m +b 2 0)>0 for any non-zero b0, we haveσ+P<0. The NEC is thereforealways violated at the throat for any wormhole solution in this model. This violation is concentrated entirely atr= 0, in a distributio...

    2018

  7. [6]

    The foundation of the general theory of relativity.,

    A. Einstein, “The foundation of the general theory of relativity.,” Annalen Phys.49(1916) no.7, 769-822

    1916

  8. [7]

    Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Ob- servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.6, 061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 128 references
  1. [8]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger,

    B. P. Abbottet al., [LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRA WITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observa- tory G...

    2017 arXiv

  2. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875 (2019), L1 [arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [10]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett.930(2022) no.2, L12 [arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Spherical black holes with regular center: A Review of existing models including a recent realization with Gaussian sources,

    S. Ansoldi, “Spherical black holes with regular center: A Review of existing models including a recent realization with Gaussian sources,” [arXiv:0802.0330 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Non-singular general-relativistic grav- itational collapse,

    J.M. Bardeen, “Non-singular general-relativistic grav- itational collapse,” in Proceedings of of International Conference GR5,Tbilisi, USSR (1968), p. 174

    1968

  6. [13]

    The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493 (2000), 149-152 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]

    2000 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Bardeen Regular Black Hole With an Electric Source,

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, “Bardeen Regular Black Hole With an Electric Source,” JCAP 06, 025 (2018) [arXiv:1802.05095 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Nonsingular black hole with a nonlinear electric source,

    H. Culetu, “Nonsingular black hole with a nonlinear electric source,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24(2015) no.09, 1542001

    2015

  9. [16]

    Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores,” Universe6(2019) no.1, 8 [arXiv:1911.01020 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Regular black holes as an alternative to black bounce,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular black holes as an alternative to black bounce,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.2, 024021 [arXiv:2404.14816 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Nature132(1933) no.3348, 1004.1

    1933

  12. [19]

    Foundations of the new field theory,

    M. Born and L. Infeld, “Foundations of the new field theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144(1934) no.852, 425-451

    1934

  13. [20]

    Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, “Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons,” Z. Phys.98(1936) no.11-12, 714- 732 [arXiv:physics/0605038 [physics]]

    1936 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Plebanski, Non-Linear Electrodynamics — A Study (C.I.E.A

    J. Plebanski, Non-Linear Electrodynamics — A Study (C.I.E.A. del I.P.N., Mexico City, 1966)

    1966

  15. [22]

    A model of nonlinear electrodynamics,

    S. I. Kruglov, “A model of nonlinear electrodynamics,” Annals Phys.353(2014), 299-306 [arXiv:1410.0351 [physics.gen-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Nonlinear arcsin-electrodynamics,

    S. I. Kruglov, “Nonlinear arcsin-electrodynamics,” An- nalen Phys.527(2015), 397-401 [arXiv:1410.7633 [physics.gen-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [24]

    On Generalized Logarithmic Elec- trodynamics,

    S. I. Kruglov, “On Generalized Logarithmic Elec- trodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) no.2, 88 [arXiv:1411.7741 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [25]

    A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,

    I. Bandos, K. Lechner, D. Sorokin and P. K. Townsend, “A non-linear duality-invariant conformal extension of Maxwell’s equations,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020), 121703 [arXiv:2007.09092 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Dark matter density profile and galactic metric in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity,

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, M. K. Mak and S. V. Sushkov, “Dark matter density profile and galactic metric in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A29(2014) no.09, 1450049 [arXiv:1305.0820 [gr- qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Structure of neutron, quark and exotic stars in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity,

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, M. K. Mak and S. V. Sushkov, “Structure of neutron, quark and exotic stars in Eddington-inspired Born-Infeld gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 88(2013), 044032 [arXiv:1305.6770 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Wormhole geometries in Eddington- Inspired Born–Infeld gravity,

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, M. K. Mak and S. V. Sushkov, “Wormhole geometries in Eddington- Inspired Born–Infeld gravity,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A30 (2015) no.35, 1550190 [arXiv:1307.1883 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D63(2001), 044005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

    2001 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general rel- ativity,

    I. Dymnikova, “Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general rel- ativity,” Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004), 4417-4429 [arXiv:gr-qc/0407072 [gr-qc]]

    2004 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source,

    L. Balart and E. C. Vagenas, “Regular black holes with a nonlinear electrodynamics source,” Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) no.12, 124045 [arXiv:1408.0306 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [32]

    On a regular charged black hole with a non- linear electric source,

    H. Culetu, “On a regular charged black hole with a non- linear electric source,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.54(2015) no.8, 2855-2863 [arXiv:1408.3334 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics,

    M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim and R. Klip- pert, “Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D61(2000), 045001 [arXiv:gr-qc/9911085 [gr-qc]]

    2000 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Geodesic of non- linear electrodynamics and stable photon orbits,

    A. S. Habibina and H. S. Ramadhan, “Geodesic of non- linear electrodynamics and stable photon orbits,” Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.12, 124036 [arXiv:2007.03211 [gr- qc]]. 17

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Can a light ray distinguish charge of a black hole in nonlin- ear electrodynamics?,

    B. Toshmatov, B. Ahmedov and D. Malafarina, “Can a light ray distinguish charge of a black hole in nonlin- ear electrodynamics?,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.2, 024026 [arXiv:2101.05496 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Good tachyons, bad bradyons: Role reversal in Einstein-nonlinear-electrodynamics models,

    M. A. A. de Paula, H. C. D. Lima, Junior., P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro and L. C. B. Crispino, “Good tachyons, bad bradyons: Role reversal in Einstein-nonlinear-electrodynamics models,” Phys. Lett. B866(2025), 139513 [arXiv:2412.18659 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Shadow of the regular Bardeen black holes and comparison of the motion of photons and neutrinos,

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık and J. Schee, “Shadow of the regular Bardeen black holes and comparison of the motion of photons and neutrinos,” Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) no.1, 44

    2019

  31. [38]

    Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear elec- trodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope,

    A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi and D. F. Mota, “Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear elec- trodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope,” JCAP 02(2020), 003 [arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [39]

    The shadow of M87* black hole within rational nonlinear electrodynamics,

    S. I. Kruglov, “The shadow of M87* black hole within rational nonlinear electrodynamics,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A35(2020) no.35, 2050291 [arXiv:2009.07657 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Smarr’s formula for black holes with non- linear electrodynamics,

    N. Breton, “Smarr’s formula for black holes with non- linear electrodynamics,” Gen. Rel. Grav.37(2005), 643-650 [arXiv:gr-qc/0405116 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Entropy of an extremal regular black hole,

    Y. S. Myung, Y. W. Kim and Y. J. Park, “Entropy of an extremal regular black hole,” Phys. Lett. B659(2008), 832-838 [arXiv:0705.2478 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Magnetically charged regular black hole in a model of nonlinear electrodynamics,

    M. S. Ma, “Magnetically charged regular black hole in a model of nonlinear electrodynamics,” Annals Phys.362 (2015), 529-537 [arXiv:1509.05580 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Asymptotic Reissner-Nordstr¨ om solu- tion within nonlinear electrodynamics,

    S. I. Kruglov, “Asymptotic Reissner-Nordstr¨ om solu- tion within nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) no.4, 044026 [arXiv:1608.04275 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,

    Z. Y. Fan and X. Wang, “Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D94(2016) no.12, 124027 [arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Regular black holes inf(T) Gravity through a non- linear electrodynamics source,

    E. L. B. Junior, M. E. Rodrigues and M. J. S. Houndjo, “Regular black holes inf(T) Gravity through a non- linear electrodynamics source,” JCAP10(2015), 060 [arXiv:1503.07857 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Regular black holes inf(R) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,

    M. E. Rodrigues, E. L. B. Junior, G. T. Marques and V. T. Zanchin, “Regular black holes inf(R) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) no.2, 024062 [arXiv:1511.00569 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Generalisation for regular black holes on general relativity tof(R) gravity,

    M. E. Rodrigues, J. C. Fabris, E. L. B. Junior and G. T. Marques, “Generalisation for regular black holes on general relativity tof(R) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76(2016) no.5, 250 [arXiv:1601.00471 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Regular black holes inf(G) gravity,

    M. V. de Sousa Silva and M. E. Rodrigues, “Regular black holes inf(G) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) no.8, 638 [arXiv:1808.05861 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Regular multihorizon black holes inf(G) gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, “Regular multihorizon black holes inf(G) gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.12, 124010 [arXiv:1906.06168 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Magnet- ically charged regular black holes in f(R,T) gravity cou- pled to nonlinear electrodynamics,

    T. Tangphati, M. Youk and S. Ponglertsakul, “Magnet- ically charged regular black holes in f(R,T) gravity cou- pled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” JHEAp43(2024), 66-78 [arXiv:2312.16614 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [51]

    (Regular) Black holes in conformal Killing gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and scalar fields,

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Ro- drigues, “(Regular) Black holes in conformal Killing gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics and scalar fields,” Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) no.5, 055012 [arXiv:2310.19508 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Black holes and regular black holes in co- incidentf(Q,B Q) gravity coupled to nonlinear elec- trodynamics,

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Ro- drigues, “Black holes and regular black holes in co- incidentf(Q,B Q) gravity coupled to nonlinear elec- trodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.3, 332 [arXiv:2402.02534 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,

    C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62(2023) no.9, 202 [arXiv:2303.11696 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,” JCAP02(2019), 042 [arXiv:1812.07114 [gr- qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Generic wormhole throats,

    M. Visser and D. Hochberg, “Generic wormhole throats,” Annals Israel Phys. Soc.13(1997), 249 [arXiv:gr-qc/9710001 [gr-qc]]

    1997 arXiv

  49. [56]

    The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,

    A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,” Phys. Rev.48(1935) no.1, 73–77

    1935

  50. [57]

    Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge,” Acta Phys. Polon. B4(1973), 251-266

    1973

  51. [58]

    Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity,

    H. G. Ellis, “Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity,” J. Math. Phys.14(1973), 104-118

    1973

  52. [59]

    Wormholes in space- time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in space- time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,” Am. J. Phys.56(1988), 395-412

    1988

  53. [60]

    Traversable wormholes from massless conformally coupled scalar fields,

    C. Barcelo and M. Visser, “Traversable wormholes from massless conformally coupled scalar fields,” Phys. Lett. B466(1999), 127-134 [arXiv:gr-qc/9908029 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Scalar fields, energy condi- tions, and traversable wormholes,

    C. Barcelo and M. Visser, “Scalar fields, energy condi- tions, and traversable wormholes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17(2000), 3843-3864 [arXiv:gr-qc/0003025 [gr-qc]]

    2000 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Traversable worm- holes with arbitrarily small energy condition viola- tions,

    M. Visser, S. Kar and N. Dadhich, “Traversable worm- holes with arbitrarily small energy condition viola- tions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003), 201102 [arXiv:gr- qc/0301003 [gr-qc]]

    2003

  56. [63]

    Phantom energy traversable worm- holes,

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Phantom energy traversable worm- holes,” Phys. Rev. D71(2005), 084011 [arXiv:gr- qc/0502099 [gr-qc]]

    2005

  57. [64]

    Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes,

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Exotic solutions in General Relativity: Traversable wormholes and ’warp drive’ spacetimes,” [arXiv:0710.4474 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  58. [65]

    Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event hori- zon?,

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin and P. Pani, “Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event hori- zon?,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) no.17, 171101 [er- ratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) no.8, 089902] [arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27 (2018) no.06, 1841005 [arXiv:1711.00087 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions,

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions,” Fundam. Theor. Phys.189(2017), pp.- 279 Springer, 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-55181-4, 978-3-319- 85588-2, 978-3-319-55182-1 [arXiv:2103.05610 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell the- ory,

    J. L. Bl´ azquez-Salcedo, C. Knoll and E. Radu, “Traversable wormholes in Einstein-Dirac-Maxwell the- ory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no.10, 101102 [arXiv:2010.07317 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Wormholes without exotic matter: quasi- normal modes, echoes and shadows,

    M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik and A. Zhidenko, “Wormholes without exotic matter: quasi- normal modes, echoes and shadows,” JCAP10(2021), 010 [arXiv:2107.05977 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Traversable Worm- holes in General Relativity,

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, “Traversable Worm- holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) no.9, 091104 [arXiv:2106.05034 [gr-qc]]. 18

    2022 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Novel black-bounce space- times: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,

    F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de Sousa Silva, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Novel black-bounce space- times: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.8, 084052 [arXiv:2009.12057 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Dynamic thin-shell black-bounce traversable wormholes,

    F. S. N. Lobo, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Dynamic thin-shell black-bounce traversable wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no.12, 124035 [arXiv:2003.09419 [gr- qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Thin-shell traversable wormhole crafted from a regular black hole with asymptotically Minkowski core,

    T. Berry, F. S. N. Lobo, A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Thin-shell traversable wormhole crafted from a regular black hole with asymptotically Minkowski core,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.6, 064054 [arXiv:2008.07046 [gr- qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes,

    J. R. Nascimento, A. Y. Petrov, P. J. Porfirio and A. R. Soares, “Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.4, 044021 [arXiv:2005.13096 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Gravitational lensing in the Simpson- Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflec- tion limit,

    N. Tsukamoto, “Gravitational lensing in the Simpson- Visser black-bounce spacetime in a strong deflec- tion limit,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.2, 024033 [arXiv:2011.03932 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Probing a black-bounce, traversable wormhole with weak deflection gravitational lensing,

    X. T. Cheng and Y. Xie, “Probing a black-bounce, traversable wormhole with weak deflection gravitational lensing,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.6, 064040 (2021)

    2021

  70. [77]

    Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black- bounce spacetime in strong deflection limits,

    “Gravitational lensing by two photon spheres in a black- bounce spacetime in strong deflection limits,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.6, 064022 [arXiv:2105.14336 [gr- qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Gravitational lensing by a black- bounce-Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime,

    J. Zhang and Y. Xie, “Gravitational lensing by a black- bounce-Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.5, 471

    2022

  72. [79]

    Shadows and optical appearance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accretion disk,

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia and D. S. C. G´ omez, “Shadows and optical appearance of black bounces illuminated by a thin accretion disk,” JCAP08(2021), 036 [arXiv:2105.15073 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Observational optical constraints of regular black holes,

    K. Jafarzade, M. Kord Zangeneh and F. S. N. Lobo, “Observational optical constraints of regular black holes,” Annals Phys.446(2022), 169126 [arXiv:2106.13893 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Shadow, deflection angle and quasinormal modes of Born-Infeld charged black holes,

    K. Jafarzade, M. Kord Zangeneh and F. S. N. Lobo, “Shadow, deflection angle and quasinormal modes of Born-Infeld charged black holes,” JCAP04(2021), 008 [arXiv:2010.05755 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Optical Features of AdS Black Holes in the Novel 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Coupled to Non- linear Electrodynamics,

    K. Jafarzade, M. Kord Zangeneh and F. S. N. Lobo, “Optical Features of AdS Black Holes in the Novel 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Coupled to Non- linear Electrodynamics,” Universe8(2022) no.3, 182 [arXiv:2009.12988 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Echoes of novel black-bounce spacetimes,

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, Z. Xu, Y. Xing, S. Wu and Z. W. Long, “Echoes of novel black-bounce spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021) no.10, 104021 [arXiv:2107.06554 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [84]

    Thin accretion disk in the Simpson-Visser black-bounce and wormhole spacetimes,

    P. Bambhaniya, S. K, K. Jusufi and P. S. Joshi, “Thin accretion disk in the Simpson-Visser black-bounce and wormhole spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.2, 023021 [arXiv:2109.15054 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Echoes from asym- metric wormholes and black bounce,

    M. Y. Ou, M. Y. Lai and H. Huang, “Echoes from asym- metric wormholes and black bounce,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82(2022) no.5, 452 [arXiv:2111.13890 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [86]

    Charged black-bounce spacetimes: Photon rings, shadows and observational appearances,

    Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, “Charged black-bounce spacetimes: Photon rings, shadows and observational appearances,” Nucl. Phys. B983(2022), 115938 [arXiv:2112.01747 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Echoes of charged black-bounce spacetimes,

    S. R. Wu, B. Q. Wang, D. Liu and Z. W. Long, “Echoes of charged black-bounce spacetimes,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82(2022) no.11, 998 [arXiv:2201.08415 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Retrolensing by two photon spheres of a black-bounce spacetime,

    N. Tsukamoto, “Retrolensing by two photon spheres of a black-bounce spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D105(2022) no.8, 084036 [arXiv:2202.09641 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [89]

    C. R. Muniz, G. Alencar, M. S. Cunha and G. J. Olmo, Phys. Rev. D112, no.2, 024018 (2025) doi:10.1103/h7rn-4ht6 [arXiv:2408.08542 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  83. [90]

    A novel family of rotating black hole mimickers,

    J. Mazza, E. Franzin and S. Liberati, “A novel family of rotating black hole mimickers,” JCAP04(2021), 082 [arXiv:2102.01105 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Rotating spacetime: black- bounces and quantum deformed black hole,

    Z. Xu and M. Tang, “Rotating spacetime: black- bounces and quantum deformed black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) no.10, 863 [arXiv:2109.13813 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Embed- ding regular black holes and black bounces in a cloud of strings,

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. d. S. Silva, “Embed- ding regular black holes and black bounces in a cloud of strings,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.8, 084016 [arXiv:2210.05383 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Ring- ing and echoes from black bounces surrounded by the string cloud,

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, Z. Xu and Z. W. Long, “Ring- ing and echoes from black bounces surrounded by the string cloud,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.3, 217 [arXiv:2210.12641 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources,

    K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de S. Silva, “Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024065 [arXiv:2305.19296 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Black String Bounce to Traversable Wormhole,

    A. M. Lima, G. M. de Alencar Filho and J. S. Furtado Neto, “Black String Bounce to Traversable Wormhole,” Symmetry15(2023) no.1, 150 [arXiv:2211.12349 [gr- qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Black bounces, wormholes, and partly phantom scalar fields,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Black bounces, wormholes, and partly phantom scalar fields,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.6, 064029 [arXiv:2206.09227 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field,

    P. Ca˜ nate, “Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.2, 024031 [arXiv:2202.02303 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Source of black bounces in general relativity,

    M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. d. S. Silva, “Source of black bounces in general relativity,” Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.4, 044064 [arXiv:2302.10772 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories,

    C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, J. C. Fabris and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce solution in k-essence theories,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.4, 044011 [arXiv:2309.10963 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [100]

    On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics,

    G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, D. S´ aez- Chill´ on G´ omez and M. V. de S. Silva, “On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.7, 745 [arXiv:2403.12897 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Charged black string bounce and its field source,

    A. Lima, G. Alencar, R. N. Costa Filho and R. R. Landim, “Charged black string bounce and its field source,” Gen. Rel. Grav.55(2023) no.10, 108 [arXiv:2306.03029 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Dyonic regular black bounce solutions in general relativity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, L. F. D. da Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Dyonic regular black bounce solutions in general relativity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.7, 724 [arXiv:2502.13327 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  96. [103]

    G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 86, 044014 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.044014 [arXiv:1207.6004 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Black-bounce in f(T) gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, “Black-bounce in f(T) gravity,” Gen. Rel. Grav.55(2023) no.1, 8 [arXiv:2203.03629 [gr-qc]]. 19

    2023 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Coincident f(Q) gravity: black holes, regular black holes, and black bounces,

    J. T. S. S. Junior and M. E. Rodrigues, “Coincident f(Q) gravity: black holes, regular black holes, and black bounces,” Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.6, 475 [arXiv:2306.04661 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity,

    J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Ro- drigues, “Black bounces in conformal Killing gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.6, 557 [arXiv:2405.09702 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Black bounces in Cotton gravity,

    E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Black bounces in Cotton gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.11, 1190 [arXiv:2407.21649 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Novel electrically charged wormhole, black hole, and black bounce exact solutions in hy- brid metric-Palatini gravity,

    G. I. R´ ois, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, “Novel electrically charged wormhole, black hole, and black bounce exact solutions in hy- brid metric-Palatini gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.12, 124012 [arXiv:2412.10324 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Horizons, throats and bounces in hy- brid metric-Palatini gravity with a non-zero potential,

    G. I. R´ ois, J. T. S. S. Junior, F. S. N. Lobo and M. E. Rodrigues, “Horizons, throats and bounces in hy- brid metric-Palatini gravity with a non-zero potential,” JCAP07(2025), 078 [arXiv:2504.07861 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  103. [110]

    General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics,

    G. Alencar, A. Duran-Cabac´ es, D. Rubiera-Garcia and D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, “General spherically symmetric black bounces within nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.10, 104020 [arXiv:2501.03909 [gr- qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Evi- dence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical- polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5−3754,

    R. P. Mignani, V. Testa, D. G. Caniulef, R. Tav- erna, R. Turolla, S. Zane and K. Wu, “Evi- dence for vacuum birefringence from the first optical- polarimetry measurement of the isolated neutron star RX J1856.5−3754,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465 (2017) no.1, 492-500 [arXiv:...

    2017 arXiv

  105. [112]

    The PVLAS experiment: A 25 year effort to measure vacuum mag- netic birefringence,

    A. Ejlli, F. Della Valle, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso and G. Zavattini, “The PVLAS experiment: A 25 year effort to measure vacuum mag- netic birefringence,” Phys. Rept.871(2020), 1-74 [arXiv:2005.12913 [physics.optics]]

    2020 arXiv

  106. [113]

    De Felice, L

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, G. J. Olmo and C. Pastor- Marcos, [arXiv:2607.26141 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  107. [114]

    L. F. D. da Silva, F. S. N. Lobo, G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D108, no.8, 084055 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.084055 [arXiv:2307.06778 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Effective Lagrangian in nonlinear electrodynamics and its properties of causal- ity and unitarity,

    A. E. Shabad and V. V. Usov, “Effective Lagrangian in nonlinear electrodynamics and its properties of causal- ity and unitarity,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011), 105006 [arXiv:1101.2343 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  109. [116]

    Stability properties of black holes in selfgravitating nonlinear electrodynam- ics,

    C. Moreno and O. Sarbach, “Stability properties of black holes in selfgravitating nonlinear electrodynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 024028 [arXiv:gr- qc/0208090 [gr-qc]]

    2003

  110. [117]

    On the stabil- ity of black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic fields,

    N. Bret´ on and S. E. Perez Bergliaffa, “On the stabil- ity of black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic fields,” [arXiv:1402.2922 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  111. [118]

    Relaxations of perturbations of spacetimes in gen- eral relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,

    B. Toshmatov, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, B. Ahmedov and D. Malafa- rina, “Relaxations of perturbations of spacetimes in gen- eral relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D99(2019) no.6, 064043 [arXiv:1903.03778 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Instability of Nonsingular Black Holes in Nonlinear Elec- trodynamics,

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “Instability of Nonsingular Black Holes in Nonlinear Elec- trodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) no.8, 081401 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.081401 [arXiv:2410.00314 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Nonsingular black holes and spherically symmetric objects in nonlinear electro- dynamics with a scalar field,

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, “Nonsingular black holes and spherically symmetric objects in nonlinear electro- dynamics with a scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.6, 064051 [arXiv:2412.04754 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  114. [122]

    Regular black hole solutions with linear electrodynam- ics,

    D. S. J. Cordeiro, E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Ju- nior, F. S. N. Lobo, J. A. A. Ramos, M. E. Rodrigues, D. Rubiera-Garcia, L. F. D. da Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Regular black hole solutions with linear electrodynam- ics,” [in preparation]

  115. [123]

    Black bounce solu- tions via nonminimal scalar-electrodynamic couplings,

    D. S. J. Cordeiro, E. L. B. Junior, J. T. S. S. Ju- nior, F. S. N. Lobo, J. A. A. Ramos, M. E. Rodrigues, L. F. D. da Silva and H. A. Vieira, “Black bounce solu- tions via nonminimal scalar-electrodynamic couplings,” [arXiv:2509.24053 [gr-qc]]

  116. [124]

    L. A. Lessa and G. J. Olmo, JCAP03(2025), 019 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/03/019 [arXiv:2412.05378 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  117. [125]

    The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time,

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, “The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time,” Cambridge University Press, 2023, ISBN 978-1-009-25316-1, 978-1-009-25315-4, 978- 0-521-20016-5, 978-0-521-09906-6, 978-0-511-82630-6, 978-0-521-09906-6 doi:10.1017/9781009253161

    2023 doi

  118. [126]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,” Nuovo Cim. B44S10(1966), 1 [erratum: Nuovo Cim. B48(1967), 463] doi:10.1007/BF02710419

    1966 doi

  119. [127]

    Smooth metrics can hide thin shells,

    J. C. Feng, “Smooth metrics can hide thin shells,” Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) no.19, 197002 doi:10.1088/1361- 6382/acf2de [arXiv:2308.11885 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Defect Worm- holes Are Defective,

    J. Baines, R. Gaur and M. Visser, “Defect Worm- holes Are Defective,” Universe9(2023) no.10, 452 doi:10.3390/universe9100452 [arXiv:2308.16624 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.