Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 161 references

A Systematic Comparison of q-Gaussian Fitting Methods across Complex Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Histogram binning destabilizes q-Gaussian fits; a bin-free CDF fit returns stable q values across solar wind, Bitcoin, and river data.

desk verdict A useful comparative warning about histogram bin-count sensitivity that is currently undermined by an unvalidated CDF implementation and no synthetic ground-truth checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08666 v1 pith:U5JBGXMH submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.stat-mech

Facundo Máximo Abaca , Darío Javier Zamora , Bruno S. Zossi , Ana G. Elias This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords q-Gaussianentropicindexqheavy-taileddistributionshistogrambinningcumulativedistributionfunctionfittingnon-extensivestatisticssolarwindfluctuationsfinancialreturns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Three real-world fluctuation records—solar wind proton density, Bitcoin log-returns, and Brazos River daily discharge—are better described by heavy-tailed $q$-Gaussians than by normal distributions. The paper's central claim is that the two most common ways of estimating the entropic index $q$, direct nonlinear fits and $q$-logarithm linearization, both depend on an arbitrary histogram bin count and produce $q$ values that swing with that choice, whereas a numerical fit to the empirical cumulative distribution function (CDF) needs no bins and returns a single stable $q$ per system. For the three datasets the CDF method gives $q\approx 1.703$, $1.836$, and $2.106$, respectively. A sympathetic reader should care because $q$ is used across geophysics, space weather, and finance to quantify heavy-tailed departure from Gaussian behavior, and the paper argues that this quantity cannot be trusted unless the fitting method itself is checked against the binning choice.

What carries the argument

The $q$-Gaussian density $Y(x)=a(1-(1-q)b x^2)^{1/(1-q)}$, which reduces to a Gaussian at $q=1$ and develops power-law tails for $q>1$. The paper compares three estimation devices: direct nonlinear least-squares fitting of this density to normalized histogram heights; iterative linearization through the $q$-logarithm $\ln_q Y = (Y^{1-q}-1)/(1-q)$, testing trial $q$ values from 1 to 3 in steps of 0.01 and selecting the best correlation; and a nonlinear fit of the empirical CDF to a numerically integrated theoretical CDF, with the integral expressed through the Beta function. The CDF fit is the load-bearing mechanism because it removes the binning step and is the only method that returns one $q$ per dataset rather than a curve of $q$ versus bin count.

What would settle it

For each dataset, numerically integrate the $q$-Gaussian density $a(1-(1-q)b x^2)^{1/(1-q)}$ with the reported fitted $q$ and $b$ over the observed range and compare the result with the empirical CDF; if the residuals exceed those reported for the CDF fit, the CDF routine is not integrating the $q$-Gaussian.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the empirical distributions of solar wind proton density fluctuations, Bitcoin log-returns, and Brazos River discharge are all consistent with $q$-Gaussian heavy-tailed statistics, and that the estimated $q$ is not a property of the data alone: with histogram-based fits it moves systematically with the number of bins, while the cumulative distribution function fit yields a bin-free estimate. The reported values are $q\approx 1.703$ (solar wind), $q\approx 1.836$ (Bitcoin), and $q\approx 2.106$ (river discharge). Because the histogram methods converge to values systematically above the CDF value at high bin counts, the paper concludes that CDF fitting gives more stable estimates and that binning is a critical methodological choice in $q$ determination.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's conclusion stands on the assumption that its numerical CDF routine correctly evaluates the $q$-Gaussian cumulative distribution; the printed analytic expression in Eq. (9) diverges for $q>1$ and the source code is not supplied.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the three analyzed systems, histogram-based $q$ estimates should be reported with a bin-count sensitivity scan; across 10 to 200 bins the fitted $q$ varies by more than a unit in the river-discharge case.
  • A single bin-free $q$ per system is available from the CDF method: $q\approx 1.703$ for solar wind proton density fluctuations, $q\approx 1.836$ for Bitcoin log-returns, and $q\approx 2.106$ for Brazos River discharge.
  • The CDF method can be applied without modification to other heavy-tailed records, since it eliminates the bin-width choice.
  • Because high-bin histogram fits converge to values systematically higher than the CDF value, earlier histogram-based $q$ estimates are likely to have overstated the degree of heavy-tailed behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial note: the Beta-function expression printed as Eq. (9) carries a positive exponent $[a(1+b\mu/\nu)]^\nu$, whereas for $q>1$ the $q$-Gaussian integrand is $(1+(q-1)b x^2)^{-1/(q-1)}$; if the implemented code follows the printed formula, the reported CDF values are not derived from the fitted density.
  • If the CDF method is verified by direct numerical integration, the systematic gap between histogram and CDF $q$ values suggests a recalibration exercise: apply both methods to archived datasets to estimate a correction for existing histogram-based $q$ values.
  • The same bin-free principle can be tested on other heavy-tailed families, such as $q$-exponentials or kappa distributions, by comparing CDF fits to histogram fits on synthetic data with known parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper compares three estimators of the entropic index q for q-Gaussian distributions applied to three real-world time series: solar wind proton density fluctuations, Bitcoin log-returns, and Brazos River discharge. The three methods are direct nonlinear fitting to histogram PDFs, linear fitting via the q-logarithm, and a CDF-based fit. The main empirical claim is that histogram-based estimates of q vary substantially with the number of bins, whereas the CDF method gives one stable, bin-free estimate per dataset. The paper also compares q-Gaussian and Gaussian fits visually and reports that the three datasets are better described by q-Gaussians.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, the paper would make a useful methodological contribution: a bin-free estimation route for q-Gaussians is of practical interest across geophysics, space physics, and econophysics, and the bin-count sensitivity results in Figures 7-9 are a clear and instructive demonstration. The paper is also honest about its scope, explicitly not claiming a unified physical mechanism. However, the main result depends on an unverified and, as written, incorrect analytic expression for the CDF, and no synthetic ground-truth validation or uncertainty quantification is provided. These gaps currently prevent the stability claim from being established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (9)] Equation (9) is not the CDF F(x)=∫_{-∞}^{x} p(x')dx' defined in Eq. (8). The integral shown runs over μ from 0 to ∞ and has no dependence on x, so it is the normalization integral over the half-line, not a cumulative distribution function. Consequently, the manuscript never specifies the theoretical curve actually used in the 'numerical fitting of the CDF'. Moreover, the constants in Eq. (9) are inconsistent: with p(x)=a(1+(b/ν)x^2)^{-ν}, the half-line integral is (a/2)(ν/b)^{1/2} B(1/2, ν−1/2), whereas Eq. (9) places a in the denominator and drops the factor ν^{1/2}. The positive exponent in the denominator is not by itself a divergence for ν>1/2; the load-bearing defect is that the expression is the wrong integral with incorrect prefactors. Because the fitted CDF q values (1.703, 1.836, 2.106) are the central evidence for the paper's main claim, this must be corrected with an explicit incomplete-beta expression for the CDF, and the fitted values must be recomputed and reported.
  2. [Section 4, Figures 7-9] The reported CDF q values are single point estimates with no error bars, confidence intervals, or bootstrap intervals, while the histogram-method scatter is shown only as raw dots. The text states that the first two methods 'begin to approach a fixed value, systematically higher' than the CDF value, but no quantitative comparison or uncertainty is given. Without an uncertainty measure for each q estimate, the claim that the CDF method is 'more stable' is not statistically supported; the apparent stability could be an artifact of a single deterministic fit, and the apparent disagreement with histogram methods could be within the (unreported) uncertainty of those methods.
  3. [Sections 3-4, validation] No simulation with a known q is performed, so the accuracy of any of the three estimators is not tested. The paper applies all methods to real data with unknown ground truth, which is sufficient to demonstrate bin sensitivity but not to conclude that the CDF method is more accurate or more reliable. A minimal validation on synthetic q-Gaussian samples with known q, covering the range q=1.5-2.5 and several sample sizes, would directly test which estimator recovers the true q and whether the CDF fit is indeed insensitive to binning. This is essential because the entire conclusion rests on the CDF implementation being correct.
  4. [Section 6, Data availability] The code is only 'available upon request', and no version or execution details are given. For a paper whose central claim is a comparison of estimation algorithms, this is a serious reproducibility limitation: the reader cannot verify that the implemented CDF differs from the incorrect Eq. (9), nor reconstruct the exact preprocessing (e.g., the normalization procedure for dNp, the exact date ranges, and the handling of missing values). The authors should provide the code as supplementary material or a persistent repository.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figures 2 and 3] The y-axis label in Figure 2 reads 'Discharge[ft3/s]' but the figure shows Bitcoin closing prices, and the y-axis label in Figure 3 reads 'price(usd)' but the figure shows river discharge; the captions and axis labels are evidently swapped.
  2. [Section 2.1] The sentence 'To ensure interdisciplinary rigor.' is an incomplete sentence and should be removed or merged with the following text.
  3. [Section 3.3] Section 5 states that solving the q-Gaussian integral 'requires the use of the incomplete beta function', but Section 3.3 only presents a complete beta function expression. The text should be consistent about which function is used in the numerical fit.
  4. [Eq. (2) and Section 2.2] Equation (2) is missing parentheses in the printed formula; it should read dNp(i) = 2*(Np(i+1)-Np(i))/(Np(i+1)+Np(i)). Also, in Section 2.2 the notations rt and Pb(i) are used without defining Pb explicitly as the Bitcoin closing price.
  5. [Figures 7-9 and text] There are typographical slips: 'linearaized' for 'linearized' in the figure captions, 'aksi' for 'also', and 'choose' for 'chosen'. These should be corrected in a careful copyedit.
  6. [Figure 1 caption] The caption says 'for 1980 to 2025', but the axis begins at 1984 and the text says '45 years' of data; the exact interval should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the three fitting methods are independent estimators of the q-Gaussian parameters, and the CDF method's correctness is a validation issue, not a circular-reasoning issue.

full rationale

The paper does not define the target quantity q in terms of the estimators, nor does it fit a parameter and then present that fitted value as an independent prediction. The q-Gaussian model is fixed externally by Eq. (1), and the three methods (PDF nonlinear fit, q-logarithm linearization, and CDF fit) are independent estimation procedures applied to the same model. The CDF method constructs an empirical CDF from sorted data and then fits q and b by minimizing residuals against a numerically integrated theoretical curve; this is conventional parameter estimation, not a definitional identity. The central claim that q estimates are sensitive to binning while the CDF method gives a bin-free estimate is an empirical comparison of fitted values, not a consequence of any equation reducing to its own input. The only self-citation, Zamora et al. (2025), appears in Section 2.1 as background for heavy-tailed solar wind fluctuations and is not load-bearing for the method comparison or the abstract's conclusion. The concern that Eq. (9) is actually a normalization integral rather than the CDF defined by Eq. (8), with potentially inconsistent prefactors, is a correctness and reproducibility issue about the numerical implementation; it is not circularity, because even an incorrect CDF formula does not make the fitted q a restatement of the input. The paper itself acknowledges in the Discussion that further statistical tests are required to fully establish the CDF method's superiority. No step in the paper's derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction, and no fitted constant is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its output depends on fitting three parameters per dataset and on the q-Gaussian model assumption. The most fragile numerical dependency is the CDF integration, whose analytic justification is flawed.

free parameters (3)
  • q (entropic index) = CDF: 1.703 (solar wind), 1.836 (Bitcoin), 2.106 (Brazos); PDF fits vary with bins
    The central output of the paper; estimated by nonlinear regression for each method and dataset.
  • b (scale parameter) = Not reported
    Fitted alongside q in the q-Gaussian formula Eq. (1); values are not tabulated.
  • a (normalization constant) = Not reported
    Fitted as the amplitude in Eq. (1); values are not tabulated.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The analyzed fluctuations (solar wind dNp, Bitcoin log returns, river discharge) are drawn from q-Gaussian distributions.
    The paper fits q-Gaussians to all datasets and uses R² to justify, but does not test against alternative heavy-tailed families.
  • domain assumption The numerical integration of the q-Gaussian CDF is implemented correctly.
    The paper's analytic Beta-function integral (Eq. 9) has a sign error (positive exponent instead of negative for q>1), so the numerical implementation must be checked; code is not shipped.
  • domain assumption q lies in [1,3] for these systems.
    The linearization method searches q from 1 to 3; the paper assumes q>1, which is supported by fits but not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Systematic Comparison of q-Gaussian Fitting Methods across Complex Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U5JBGXMH

@misc{pith2026260808666,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Systematic Comparison of q-Gaussian Fitting Methods across Complex Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U5JBGXMH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08666}
}
abstract

Nature exhibits a wide variety of nonlinear phenomena characterized by strong fluctuations that push the system away from equilibrium. Recent studies have shown that non-extensive statistics are more suitable for analyzing these phenomena, as they can capture long-range correlations and heavy-tailed distributions that conventional Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics cannot represent. However, estimating the non-extensiveness parameter ($q$) is not trivial, and methods vary significantly across disciplines. This paper presents a systematic and interdisciplinary comparison of three fitting methods: direct nonlinear fitting of the probability distribution function (PDF), linearization using the q-logarithm function, and numerical fitting of the cumulative distribution function (CDF). We applied this analysis to various phenomena, from areas such as geophysics, space weather and economics, analyzing the critical impact of discretization. The results show that $q$ estimates are highly sensitive to histogram binning, while the CDF-based method provides a bin-free alternative that yields more stable estimates for the datasets analyzed here. This contribution provides relevant information for the search for a method that allows the correct determination of the parameters of heavy-tailed distributions in various disciplines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08666 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Values of proton density (Np), in the solar wind for 1980 to 2025. The variable analyzed consists of the successive fluctuations in proton density, defined as: dNp(i) = 2 ∗ Np(i + 1) − Np(i) Np(i + 1) + Np(i) (2) These fluctuations are adequately normalized using a local moving average to ensure statistical consistency. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Closing values of bitcoin from 2016 to 2026. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Discharge values of Brazos river for 2016 to 2026. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the fit of the solar wind fluctuations histogram on a LOG scale.The red line is for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the fit of logarithmic returns of the bitcoin prices fluctuations histogram on a LOG scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of the fit of the Brazos river discharge fluctuations histogram on a LOG scale. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The parameter q, for the proton density distribution, in terms of the number of bins obtained with: the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The parameter q, for the set of logarithmic returns of the closing value of Bitcoin, in terms of the number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The parameter q, for the set of Brazos river discharge, in terms of the number of bins obtained with: the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

161 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and Gagne, Y

    Anselmet, F. and Gagne, Y. and Hopfinger, E. J. and Antonia, R. A. , doi =. Journal of Fluid Mechanics , month =

  2. [2]

    Asbridge, J. R. and Bame, S. J. and Strong, I. B. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research , month =

  3. [3]

    and Anastasiadis, Anastasios and Papadimitriou, Constantinos and Mandea, Mioara and Eftaxias, Konstantinos , doi =

    Balasis, Georgios and Daglis, Ioannis A. and Anastasiadis, Anastasios and Papadimitriou, Constantinos and Mandea, Mioara and Eftaxias, Konstantinos , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  4. [4]

    and Papadimitriou, Constantinos and Kalimeri, Maria and Anastasiadis, Anastasios and Eftaxias, Konstantinos , doi =

    Balasis, Georgios and Daglis, Ioannis A. and Papadimitriou, Constantinos and Kalimeri, Maria and Anastasiadis, Anastasios and Eftaxias, Konstantinos , doi =. Geophysical Research Letters , month =

  5. [5]

    Barbosa, C. S. and Caraballo, R. and Alves, L. R. and Hartmann, G. A. and Beggan, C. D. and Viljanen, A. and Ngwira, C. M. and Papa, A. R. R. and Pirjola, R. J. , doi =. Space Weather , month =

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1017/CBO9780511524585 , isbn =

    Beck, Christian and Sch. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511524585 , isbn =

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524585

  7. [7]

    Blinder, S.M. , doi =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , pages =

  8. [8]

    and Halekas, Jasper S

    Borovsky, Joseph E. and Halekas, Jasper S. and Whittlesey, Phyllis L. , doi =. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

Show all 161 references
  1. [9]

    Briand, Jean Pierre , doi =

  2. [10]

    Living Reviews in Solar Physics , title =

    Bruno, Roberto and Carbone, Vincenzo , doi =. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , title =

  3. [11]

    Burlaga, L. F. , doi =. Geophysical Research Letters , month =

  4. [12]

    Burlaga, L. F. , doi =. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics , number =

  5. [13]

    Burlaga, L. F. and F.‐Vi. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =. doi:10.1029/2004JA010763 , issn =

    doi

  6. [14]

    Burlaga, L. F. and F.‐Vi. Geophysical Research Letters , month =. doi:10.1029/2004GL020715 , issn =

    doi

  7. [15]

    Burlaga, L. F. and Ness, N. F. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

  8. [16]

    Burlaga, L. F. and Vi. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , number =. doi:10.1029/2005JA011132 , file =

    doi

  9. [17]

    Burlaga, L. F. and Wang, C. and Ness, N. F. , doi =. Geophysical Research Letters , month =

  10. [18]

    Power-law statistics and stellar rotational velocities in the Pleiades , journal =

    Carvalho, J.C , doi =. Power-law statistics and stellar rotational velocities in the Pleiades , journal =

  11. [19]

    and Sommeria, J

    Chavanis, P.-H. and Sommeria, J. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month =

  12. [20]

    Chen, C. H. K. and Bale, S. D. and Salem, C. and Mozer, F. S. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

  13. [21]

    Chernyshov, A. A. and Mogilevsky, M. M. and Kozelov, B. V. , doi =. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , number =

  14. [22]

    Coleman, Paul J. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

  15. [23]

    and Shea, M.A

    Dasso, S. and Shea, M.A. , doi =. Advances in Space Research , month =

  16. [24]

    doi:10.1007/s00024-019-02307-z , issn =

    Pure and Applied Geophysics , month =. doi:10.1007/s00024-019-02307-z , issn =

    doi

  17. [25]

    Dewan, Edmond M. , doi =. Physics of Fluids , number =

  18. [26]

    Divine, Neil and Garrett, H. B. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

  19. [27]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05734-3 , isbn =

    Ebeling, Werner and P. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05734-3 , isbn =

    doi

  20. [28]

    doi:10.1063/1.3684232 , issn =

    Physics of Plasmas , month =. doi:10.1063/1.3684232 , issn =

    doi

  21. [29]

    Elias, Ana G. , doi =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , month =

  22. [30]

    and de Artigas, Marta Zossi and

    Elias, Ana G. and de Artigas, Marta Zossi and. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =. doi:10.1029/2009JA015136 , issn =

    doi

  23. [31]

    and Zossi, Bruno S

    Elias, Ana G. and Zossi, Bruno S. and Yiğit, Erdal and Saavedra, Zenon and. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , month =. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2017.03.004 , issn =

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    and McComas, David J

    Elliott, Heather A. and McComas, David J. and DeForest, Craig E. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

  25. [33]

    and Chum, Jaroslav and Elias, Ana G

    Fagre, Mariano and Zossi, Bruno S. and Chum, Jaroslav and Elias, Ana G. , doi =. SN Applied Sciences , month =

  26. [34]

    and Chum, Jaroslav and Yiğit, Erdal and Elias, Ana G

    Fagre, Mariano and Zossi, Bruno S. and Chum, Jaroslav and Yiğit, Erdal and Elias, Ana G. , doi =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , month =

  27. [35]

    and Yiğit, Erdal and Amit, Hagay and Elias, Ana G

    Fagre, Mariano and Zossi, Bruno S. and Yiğit, Erdal and Amit, Hagay and Elias, Ana G. , doi =. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica , month =

  28. [36]

    and Plastino, A

    Ferri, G.L. and Plastino, A. and Rocca, M.C. and Zamora, D.J. , doi =. European Physical Journal B , keywords =

  29. [37]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

    Futaana, Yoshifumi and Machida, Shinobu and Saito, Yoshifumi and Matsuoka, Ayako and Hayakawa, Hajime , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

  30. [38]

    Gell-Mann, Murray and Tsallis, Constantino , doi =

  31. [39]

    Ghil, Michael , doi =

  32. [40]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , keywords =

    Gopinath, Sumesh and. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2017.11.011 , file =

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Gupta, V. K. and Waymire, E. , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2147-4_12 , pages =

    doi

  34. [42]

    Gurevich, A. V. , doi =

  35. [43]

    and Jensen, Mogens H

    Halsey, Thomas C. and Jensen, Mogens H. and Kadanoff, Leo P. and Procaccia, Itamar and Shraiman, Boris I. , doi =. Physical Review A , month =

  36. [44]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics , month =

    Hendi, S H and Sheykhi, A , doi =. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , month =

  37. [45]

    and Procaccia, Itamar , doi =

    Hentschel, H.G.E. and Procaccia, Itamar , doi =. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , month =

  38. [46]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , month =

    Huang, Zhifu and Others , doi =. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , month =

  39. [47]

    Iliopoulos, A. C. and Pavlos, G. P. and Papadimitriou, E. E. and Sfiris, D. S. and Athanasiou, M. A. and Tsoutsouras, V. G. , doi =. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , month =

  40. [48]

    Physical Review , month =

    Jaynes, E T , doi =. Physical Review , month =

  41. [49]

    Jaynes, E T , isbn =

  42. [50]

    Jones, Bernard , doi =

  43. [51]

    The European Physical Journal B , month =

    Kalogeropoulos, Nikos , doi =. The European Physical Journal B , month =

  44. [52]

    Karakatsanis, L. P. and Pavlos, G. P. and Xenakis, M. N. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  45. [53]

    Kasper, Justin Christophe , school =

  46. [54]

    Kelley, Michael C. , doi =

  47. [55]

    King, J. H. and Papitashvili, N. E. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

  48. [56]

    Krimigis, S. M. and Carbary, J. F. and Keath, E. P. and Armstrong, T. P. and Lanzerotti, L. J. and Gloeckler, G. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

  49. [57]

    Lazar, Marian and Fichtner, Horst , doi =

  50. [58]

    The European Physical Journal B , month =

    Lenzi, E K and Mendes, R S , doi =. The European Physical Journal B , month =

  51. [59]

    and Shane, Alexander D

    Liemohn, Michael W. and Shane, Alexander D. and Azari, Abigail R. and Petersen, Alicia K. and Swiger, Brian M. and Mukhopadhyay, Agnit , doi =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , keywords =

  52. [60]

    Physical Review Letters , month =

    Liu, Bin and Goree, J , doi =. Physical Review Letters , month =

  53. [61]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Liu, Pei and Ning, Li Juan , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  54. [62]

    Livadiotis, G , isbn =

  55. [63]

    and McComas, D

    Livadiotis, G. and McComas, D. J. , doi =. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

  56. [64]

    and McComas, D

    Livadiotis, G. and McComas, D. J. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =

  57. [65]

    and McComas, D

    Livadiotis, G. and McComas, D. J. , doi =. Space Science Reviews , month =

  58. [66]

    and McComas, D.J

    Livadiotis, G. and McComas, D.J. , booktitle =. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-804638-8.00010-3 , pages =

    doi

  59. [67]

    and Fedorov, A

    Louarn, P. and Fedorov, A. and Prech, L. and Owen, C. J. and Bruno, R. and Livi, S. and Lavraud, B. and Rouillard, A. P. and G. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141095 , file =

    doi

  60. [68]

    and Zakharov, A

    Lundin, R. and Zakharov, A. and Pellinen, R. and Borg, H. and Hultqvist, B. and Pissarenko, N. and Dubinin, E. M. and Barabash, S. W. and Liede, I. and Koskinen, H. , doi =. Nature , month =

  61. [69]

    Lyra, M. L. and Tsallis, C. , doi =. Physical Review Letters , month =

  62. [70]

    and Pierrard, V

    Maksimovic, M. and Pierrard, V. and Lemaire, J. F. , file =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

  63. [71]

    and Zouganelis, I

    Maksimovic, M. and Zouganelis, I. and Chaufray, J. Y. and Issautier, K. and Scime, E. E. and Littleton, J. E. and Marsch, E. and McComas, D. J. and Salem, C. and Lin, R. P. and Elliott, H. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , number =

  64. [72]

    Geophysical Research Letters , month =

    Maksimovic, Milan and Pierrard, Viviane and Riley, Pete , doi =. Geophysical Research Letters , month =

  65. [73]

    , booktitle =

    Mandelbrot, Benoit B. , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/3-540-05716-1_20 , editor =

    doi

  66. [74]

    pure and applied geophysics , month =

    Mandelbrot, Beno. pure and applied geophysics , month =. doi:10.1007/BF00874478 , issn =

    doi

  67. [75]

    Mayaud, P. N. , doi =

  68. [76]

    and Bame, S.J

    McComas, D.J. and Bame, S.J. and Barker, P. and Feldman, W.C. and Phillips, J.L. and Riley, P. and Griffee, J.W. , doi =. Space Science Reviews , pages =

  69. [77]

    International Journal of Modern Physics A , pages =

    Eugenio Megías, et.al , doi =. International Journal of Modern Physics A , pages =

  70. [78]

    doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/1/013101 , journal =

    Michel, N and Nazarewicz, W and P. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/36/1/013101 , journal =

    doi

  71. [79]

    Physical Review C , month =

    Moghrabi, Kassem and Grasso, Marcella , doi =. Physical Review C , month =

  72. [80]

    Nobre, F. D. and Rego-Monteiro, M. A. and Tsallis, C. , doi =. Physical Review Letters , month =

  73. [81]

    and Laoye, J.A

    Ogunsua, B.O. and Laoye, J.A. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  74. [82]

    Padmanabhan, T , doi =

  75. [83]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Pavlos, G P and Others , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  76. [84]

    Pavlos, G. P. and Iliopoulos, A. C. and Zastenker, G. N. and Zelenyi, L. M. and Karakatsanis, L. P. and Riazantseva, M. O. and Xenakis, M. N. and Pavlos, E. G. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  77. [85]

    Pavlos, G. P. and Karakatsanis, L. P. and Iliopoulos, A. C. and Pavlos, E. G. and Tsonis, A. A. , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58895-7_22 , pages =

    doi

  78. [86]

    Pavlos, G. P. and Karakatsanis, L. P. and Xenakis, M. N. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  79. [87]

    and Karakatsanis, L.P

    Pavlos, G.P. and Karakatsanis, L.P. and Xenakis, M.N. and Pavlos, E.G. and Iliopoulos, A.C. and Sarafopoulos, D.V. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  80. [88]

    and Karakatsanis, L.P

    Pavlos, G.P. and Karakatsanis, L.P. and Xenakis, M.N. and Sarafopoulos, D. and Pavlos, E.G. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  81. [89]

    Peierls, Rudolf , doi =

  82. [90]

    q-distributions in complex systems: a brief review , volume =

    Picoli, S and Mendes, R S and Malacarne, L C and Santos, R P B , doi =. q-distributions in complex systems: a brief review , volume =. Brazilian Journal of Physics , month =

  83. [91]

    and Lazar, M

    Pierrard, V. and Lazar, M. , doi =. Solar Physics , month =

  84. [92]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , month =

    Plastino, A R and Plastino, A and Tsallis, C , doi =. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , month =

  85. [93]

    and Rocca, M.C

    Plastino, A. and Rocca, M.C. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  86. [94]

    and Rocca, M.C

    Plastino, A. and Rocca, M.C. and Ferri, G.L. and Zamora, D.J. , doi =. Nuclear Physics A , keywords =

  87. [95]

    and Plastino, A

    Plastino, A.R. and Plastino, A. , doi =. Physics Letters A , month =

  88. [96]

    Plastino, A and Rocca, M C , doi =

  89. [97]

    Journal of Physics Communications , keywords =

    Plastino, A and Rocca, M C , doi =. Journal of Physics Communications , keywords =

  90. [98]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Plastino, A and Rocca, M C , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  91. [99]

    Poblet, Facundo L , file =

  92. [100]

    Physical Review E , month =

    Ponmurugan, M , doi =. Physical Review E , month =

  93. [101]

    Entropy , month =

    Prehl, Janett and Essex, Christopher and Hoffmann, Karl Heinz , doi =. Entropy , month =

  94. [102]

    A and Marichev, O I , isbn =

    Prudnikov, A P and Brychkov, Yu. A and Marichev, O I , isbn =

  95. [103]

    , publisher =

    Rishbeth, Henry and Garriott, Owen K. , publisher =

  96. [104]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Rocca, M and Plastino, A and Ferri, G L , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  97. [105]

    The European Physical Journal B , month =

    Rocca, Mario and Plastino, Angel and Ferri, Gustavo , doi =. The European Physical Journal B , month =

  98. [106]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Rosa, A C P and de Jesus, J C O and Moret, M A , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  99. [107]

    Astrophysics and Space Science , month =

    Sahu, B and Others , doi =. Astrophysics and Space Science , month =

  100. [108]

    Saleem, H. and. Physics of Plasmas , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4968223 , issn =

    doi

  101. [109]

    Scarfone, A. M. and Quarati, P. and Mezzorani, G. and Lissia, M. , doi =. Astrophysics and Space Science , month =

  102. [110]

    Scott, Alwyn , doi =

  103. [111]

    and Gurgiolo, C

    Servidio, S. and Gurgiolo, C. and Carbone, V. and Goldstein, M. L. , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

  104. [112]

    Shaikh, Dastgeer and Zank, G. P. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month =

  105. [113]

    Ali and Saleem, H

    Shan, S. Ali and Saleem, H. , doi =. Astrophysics and Space Science , keywords =

  106. [114]

    Sorriso-Valvo, Luca and Carbone, Francesco and Leonardis, Ersilia and Chen, Christopher H.K. and. Advances in Space Research , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.024 , file =

    2016 doi

  107. [115]

    doi:10.1142/9789813109032_0007 , month =

    Stacey, Blake C and Allen, Benjamin and Bar-Yam, Yaneer , booktitle =. doi:10.1142/9789813109032_0007 , month =

    doi

  108. [116]

    Nuclear Physics A , month =

    Steele, James V and Furnstahl, R J , doi =. Nuclear Physics A , month =

  109. [117]

    doi:10.1029/2008JA013883 , file =

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , month =. doi:10.1029/2008JA013883 , file =

    doi

  110. [118]

    doi:10.1029/2007JA012733 , file =

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , number =. doi:10.1029/2007JA012733 , file =

    doi

  111. [119]

    Sweeney, M. A. , doi =. Astrophysical Journal , pages =

  112. [120]

    Thurner, Stephan , isbn =

  113. [121]

    The European Physical Journal A , month =

    Tsallis, C , doi =. The European Physical Journal A , month =

  114. [122]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , month =

    Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , month =

  115. [123]

    Tsallis, Constantino , doi =

  116. [124]

    Journal of Statistical Physics , month =

    Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. Journal of Statistical Physics , month =

  117. [125]

    The European Physical Journal Special Topics , month =

    Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. The European Physical Journal Special Topics , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:1602.04151 , file =

    arXiv

  118. [126]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , month =

    Tsallis, Constantino and Gell-Mann, Murray and Sato, Yuzuru , doi =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , month =

  119. [127]

    Milan Journal of Mathematics , keywords =

    Umarov, Sabir and Tsallis, Constantino and Steinberg, Stanly , doi =. Milan Journal of Mathematics , keywords =

  120. [128]

    and Maruca, Bennett A

    Verscharen, Daniel and Klein, Kristopher G. and Maruca, Bennett A. , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 , eprint =

    doi

  121. [129]

    and Borovsky, Joseph E

    Viall, Nicholeen M. and Borovsky, Joseph E. , doi =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , keywords =

  122. [130]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Vignat, C and Plastino, A , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  123. [131]

    Physical Review D , month =

    Wang, Tower , doi =. Physical Review D , month =

  124. [132]

    Wendland, David , school =

  125. [133]

    doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(01)00666-5 , journal =

    Wilk, G and W. doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(01)00666-5 , journal =

    doi

  126. [134]

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2770 , journal =

    Wilk, G and W. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2770 , journal =

    doi

  127. [135]

    doi:10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.017 , journal =

    Wio, Horacio S and Toral, Ra. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2004.01.017 , journal =

    2004 doi

  128. [136]

    Physical Review Letters , month =

    Wissner-Gross, A D and Freer, C E , doi =. Physical Review Letters , month =

  129. [137]

    Physical Review C , month =

    Yang, C J and Others , doi =. Physical Review C , month =

  130. [138]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , month =

    Yi , E and Others , doi =. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , month =

  131. [139]

    Yoon, Peter H. , doi =

  132. [140]

    Entropy , month =

    Zamora, D J and Others , doi =. Entropy , month =

  133. [141]

    Zamora, D. J. and Rocca, M. C. and Plastino, Angel , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  134. [142]

    and Rocca, M.C

    Zamora, D.J. and Rocca, M.C. and Plastino, A. and Ferri, G.L. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  135. [143]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

    Zamora, Dario Javier and Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , month =

  136. [144]

    Zamora, J. D. and Rocca, M. C. and Plastino, A. and Ferri, G. L. , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1803.08125 , file =

    arXiv

  137. [145]

    Zamora, J. D. and Abaca, F. M. and Zossi, B. S. and Elias, A. G. , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , month =

  138. [146]

    Entropy , month =

    Gazeau, Jean Pierre and Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. Entropy , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:1911.00594 , file =

    1911 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Burlaga, L. F. and Vi. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2005.06.065 , file =

    2005 doi

  140. [148]

    Ferri, G. L. and. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2009.12.020 , file =

    2009 doi

  141. [149]

    Journal of Mathematical Physics , month =

    Umarov, Sabir and Tsallis, Constantino and Gell-Mann, Murray and Steinberg, Stanly , doi =. Journal of Mathematical Physics , month =

  142. [150]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

    Tsallis, Constantino , doi =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , keywords =

  143. [151]

    Astrophysics and Space Science , keywords =

    Endris, Solomon , doi =. Astrophysics and Space Science , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:arXiv:0806.1870v3 , file =

    arXiv

  144. [152]

    PNAS , number =

    Tsallis, Constantino and Gell-Mann, Murray and Sato, Yuzuru , file =. PNAS , number =

  145. [153]

    Entropy , VOLUME =

    Tsallis, Constantino , TITLE =. Entropy , VOLUME =. 2017 , NUMBER =

    2017

  146. [154]

    2022 , publisher=

    The fundamentals of heavy tails: Properties, emergence, and estimation , author=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  147. [155]

    Water Resources Research , volume =

    Merz, Bruno and Basso, Stefano and Fischer, Svenja and Lun, David and Blöschl, Günter and Merz, Ralf and Guse, Björn and Viglione, Alberto and Vorogushyn, Sergiy and Macdonald, Elena and Wietzke, Luzie and Schumann, Andreas , title =. Water Resources Research , volume =. doi:h...

    doi

  148. [156]

    and McComas, D

    Livadiotis, G. and McComas, D. J. , year = 2013, month = jun, journal =. Understanding. doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9982-9 , abstract =

    2013 doi

  149. [157]

    and Zank, G

    Zhao, L.-L. and Zank, G. P. and Opher, M. and Zieger, B. and Li, H. and Florinski, V. and Adhikari, L. and Zhu, X. and Nakanotani, M. , year = 2024, month = sep, journal =. Turbulence,. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad64c8 , urldate =

    2024 doi

  150. [158]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume =

    Nonextensive Triplets in Cryptocurrency Exchanges , author =. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.066 , urldate =

    2018 doi

  151. [159]

    , year = 2018, month = apr, journal =

    Stosic, Tatijana and Stosic, Borko and Singh, Vijay P. , year = 2018, month = apr, journal =. Q -Triplet for. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.061 , urldate =

    2018 doi

  152. [160]

    Space-time fractional porous media equation: Application on modeling of S&P500 price return , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054140 , url =

    2021 doi

  153. [161]

    Analysis of Daily Streamflow Complexity by

    Mihailovi. Analysis of Daily Streamflow Complexity by. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.03.041 , abstract =

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.