Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 78 references

Layer-Locked Chiral Topological Superconductivity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonsymmorphic lattice symmetry can lock chiral Majorana edge states, vortex zero modes, and thermal Hall transport to one layer, with a gate voltage switching the locking layer.

desk verdict Clean minimal model, but the 'universal' overstates what is actually shown — the mechanism works within the truncated Hamiltonian, not as a general symmetry principle. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08843 v1 pith:6CMKYZEN submitted 2026-08-09 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-con

Yijie Mo , Zhongbo Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.supr-con
keywords layer-lockedtopologicalsuperconductivitylayer-resolvedChernnumberchiralMajoranaedgestateszeromodesnonsymmorphicsymmetryquantumanomalouslayerHalleffectthermalgate-tunablephases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a symmetry-based mechanism for layer-locked topological superconductivity: when two layers are related by nonsymmorphic lattice symmetries, interlayer hopping vanishes along high-symmetry lines in the Brillouin zone. In a bilayer antiferromagnetic s-wave superconductor, this makes layer-resolved Chern numbers nearly quantized, so chiral Majorana edge states, vortex-core zero modes, and the thermal Hall response lock to one layer. A gate voltage can switch between three phases: a bilayer-locked phase with zero total Chern number and two single-layer-locked phases with Chern number $\pm 1$. The mechanism works at any interlayer coupling strength and without disorder, unlike earlier proposals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the interlayer hopping form factor $\cos(k_x/2)\cos(k_y/2)$ in the Bogoliubov-de Gennes Hamiltonian, which vanishes at the Brillouin-zone boundary because each site couples to four nearest neighbors in the other layer and the paths interfere destructively. This zero, enforced by the glide and screw symmetries relating the layers, decouples the layers exactly at the momenta where the gap closes. Together with the layer projection operator $P_z$, it makes the layer-resolved Berry curvature concentrate near those momenta, so the layer-resolved Chern numbers become nearly quantized even for strong interlayer coupling.

What would settle it

Add a next-nearest-neighbor or substrate-mediated interlayer hopping term to the tight-binding Hamiltonian and recompute the layer-resolved Chern numbers at the same parameters; if the near-integer values shift substantially, the symmetry-enforced decoupling is not robust. A layer-resolved thermal Hall measurement that fails to show a gate-voltage sign switch with near-quantized magnitude would also refute the proposal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a universal, disorder-free mechanism produces layer-locked topological phases: if adjacent layers can be mapped to each other by nonsymmorphic symmetries, interlayer hopping is symmetry-enforced to vanish along specific high-symmetry lines, so topological transitions occurring at those momenta make the layer-resolved Berry curvature nearly independent between layers. Applied to a $PT$-symmetric bilayer antiferromagnetic metal with s-wave pairing, the paper finds three gate-tunable phases with almost integer layer-resolved Chern numbers. In the bilayer-locking phase $C=0$ with $C_t=-C_b\simeq -1$; in the top-layer-locking phase $C=-1$ with $C_t\simeq -1$ and $C_b\simeq 0$; and in the bottom-layer-locking phase $C=1$ with $C_t\simeq 0$ and $C_b\simeq 1$. The corresponding chiral Majorana edge states, vortex-core Majorana zero modes, and layer-resolved thermal Hall coefficients follow the layer-resolved Chern numbers, giving fully electric-field-tunable chiral topological superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping is the only interlayer tunneling; any additional interlayer hopping that does not vanish at the same zone-boundary momenta would spoil the near-quantization.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism holds, layer-locked chiral topological superconductivity provides a disorder-free route to the superconducting analogue of the quantum anomalous layer Hall effect.
  • Reversing the gate voltage reverses the chirality and switches the hosting layer of the chiral Majorana edge state, making the topological response fully electric-field tunable.
  • At low temperature the layer-resolved thermal Hall coefficients are predicted to be nearly quantized integer multiples of $\kappa_0$, with the two layers contributing opposite signs in the bilayer-locking phase.
  • The same symmetry-based argument should extend to multilayer stacks, yielding larger Chern numbers and designed layer-resolved edge-state patterns, and to helical and second-order topological phases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism should transfer to insulating platforms: any topological phase transition pinned to the zone-boundary momenta in a nonsymmorphic bilayer should produce nearly quantized layer-resolved Chern numbers and layer-locked chiral edge states there too.
  • Real materials will have subleading interlayer hoppings, so the vanishing is only approximate; estimating the tolerable size of next-nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping would be a natural extension of the calculation.
  • A clean experimental discriminant is the gate-voltage sign switch of the thermal Hall response combined with local imaging of the edge mode's layer, which would separate this symmetry mechanism from disorder-induced localization.
  • The bilayer-locking phase's two spatially separated Majorana zero modes on one vortex suggest a route to doubled Majorana storage; whether braiding operations survive finite-size hybridization is left open by the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a symmetry-based mechanism for realizing layer-locked topological phases in clean bilayers: when two adjacent layers are mutually mapped by nonsymmorphic symmetries, the interlayer hopping form factor cos(kx/2)cos(ky/2) vanishes on the Brillouin-zone boundary, so topological phase transitions occurring there see effectively decoupled layers. The authors implement this idea in a bilayer antiferromagnetic s-wave Bogoliubov-de Gennes model [Eq. (1)] with spin-orbit coupling, a magnetic exchange field, and a layer-staggered gate potential V_z. They compute the total Chern number C and layer-resolved Chern numbers C_t, C_b, and identify three gate-tunable phases: a bilayer-locking phase with C=0 and C_t=-C_b approximately -1, and two single-layer-locking phases with C=+/-1 where the nonzero Chern number is confined almost entirely to one layer. They corroborate these bulk quantities with ribbon-edge spectra showing layer-locked chiral Majorana edge states, vortex simulations showing layer-locked Majorana zero modes, and finite-temperature layer-resolved thermal Hall calculations. The paper closes with a proposal that the mechanism could apply to FeSe and related nonsymmorphic layered superconductors.

Significance. If the universal mechanism holds, this work would provide a disorder-free route to the quantum anomalous layer Hall effect and its superconducting analogue, with electrically switchable layer-locked Majorana edge states, vortex Majorana zero modes, and thermal Hall responses. The strengths of the paper are that the layer-resolved Chern numbers are computed directly from the Hamiltonian and checked against independent finite-system simulations (edge spectra, vortex profiles, thermal Hall), and the model is explicit enough to be reproduced. The central limitation is that C_z is not a genuine topological invariant, as the authors acknowledge after Eq. (2), and the near-quantized values reported (0.981-0.999) are demonstrated for a single parameter set and for a Hamiltonian containing only nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping. The universality and robustness claims therefore require additional support before the mechanism can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model Hamiltonian, Eq. (1) and following paragraph] The central claim that the nonsymmorphic symmetries 'dictate the interlayer hopping possesses a form factor cos(kx/2)cos(ky/2)' is established only for the nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping included in Eq. (1). The three nonsymmorphic operations listed constrain the phases of symmetry-equivalent interlayer bonds, but they do not, as presented, eliminate all symmetry-allowed interlayer channels; a next-nearest-neighbor or substrate-mediated interlayer hopping generically has a Bloch sum that does not vanish at X, Y, and M. Because the paper itself states after Eq. (2) that C_z is not a genuine topological invariant, the near-quantized values are properties of the truncated Hamiltonian, not of the symmetry alone. Without a proof that every symmetry-allowed interlayer channel vanishes at the transition momentum, or a numerical demonstration that adding such a term leaves C_t and C_b nearly quantized, the claimed universality of the mechanism and the FeSe suggestion are not supported.
  2. [Layer-locked chiral topological superconductivity, Fig. 2(a)] The text states that the mechanism operates 'regardless of interlayer coupling strength', but all numerical results use a single value of the interlayer hopping, eta=0.5 (Figs. 2-4 and the common-parameter lists). No sweep over eta is shown, nor over lambda_so, M_z, Delta, or mu beyond the one listed parameter set. Since the phase boundaries in Fig. 2(a) are pinned to the gap-closing condition at M only for the specific parameters chosen, the claim that the near-quantization of C_z is robust to interlayer coupling strength is not demonstrated. At minimum, the authors should show C_t and C_b versus eta, including large eta, and verify that the topological transitions remain at the decoupling line.
  3. [Layer-locked vortex-core MZMs, Fig. 3(a)] In the bilayer-locking phase the total Chern number is zero, so the two vortex-core Majorana modes are not protected by the standard bulk-vortex correspondence. The paper asserts that the nearly quantized layer-resolved Chern numbers 'prevent their hybridization', but this does not obviously follow from the bulk C_z values: the vortex wave packet is not a Bloch eigenstate, and the momentum-dependent interlayer coupling need not vanish for a localized core state. The finite-size eigenvalues are stated to be nonzero, yet no energy splitting or system-size scaling is reported, and no symmetry argument for the degeneracy is given. To support the claim of two coexisting robust MZMs, the authors should provide the finite-size scaling of the splitting and a test with a symmetry-allowed interlayer perturbation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] There are typographical issues such as 'withs-wave' in the abstract, 'p±ip' without a space, and inconsistent hyphenation of 's-wave'; these should be corrected.
  2. [After Eq. (2) and Fig. 2(a)] The text says near-perfect quantization is effectively exact, but the bilayer-locking phase has C_t=-0.981 rather than -1. The difference between 'approximately -1' in Fig. 2(a) and 'holds exactly' in the thermal Hall section should be stated consistently so the reader knows the numerical precision.
  3. [Fig. 2(b) discussion] The degeneracy of the two edge-state branches at ky=pi is attributed to the lattice symmetry; the authors should identify which of the glide or screw symmetries protects this crossing and why the two modes do not hybridize for finite eta.
  4. [Layer-resolved thermal Hall effects, Eq. (4)] Because sigma_z(E) in Eq. (5) is defined through the layer-resolved Berry curvature, the zero-temperature relation kappa_xy_z=C_z*kappa_0 follows directly from the definition when C_z is the full integral; the numerical agreement is a useful consistency check but should not be described as an independent verification.
  5. [Discussions and conclusions] The FeSe proposal should be qualified: FeSe's actual interlayer hoppings are not shown to be restricted to the nearest-neighbor channel, and replacing the antiferromagnetic exchange field by an external Zeeman field changes the model assumptions.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Thermal Hall 'layer-locking' identity is definitional; main topological phase derivation is self-contained.

  1. self definitional [Section 'Layer-resolved thermal Hall effects', Eqs. (4)-(5) and discussion of Fig. 4.]
    "By analogy with the definition of the layer-resolved Hall conductivity, we define the layer-resolved thermal Hall coefficient as κxy_z = ... σ_z(E) = Σ_n ∫_{E_n(k)<E} Ω^n_z(k) d²k/(2π)². ... It is evident that the relation κxy_z = C_z κ0 holds exactly."

    Eq. (5) defines σ_z(E) as the cumulative integral of the same layer-resolved Berry curvature Ω^n_z that defines C_z through Eqs. (2)-(3). Eq. (4) then constructs κxy_z from σ_z(E), so in the low-temperature limit κxy_z = C_z κ0 is an algebraic identity following from the definitions, not an independent physical prediction. The Fig. 4 curves repackage the layer-resolved Chern numbers rather than provide a separate confirmation of layer-locking; the text itself says 'Evidently ... holds exactly.' This is transparent and does not affect the gap-closing, Chern-number, edge-state, or vortex-MZM calculations.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and not circular. The model Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) explicitly specifies the nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping 4η cos(kx/2)cos(ky/2); the paper does not fit this form factor to the quantities it later predicts. The phase boundaries are obtained from the BdG gap-closing condition at M, the total and layer-resolved Chern numbers are evaluated by direct integration of Berry curvature, and the edge spectra and vortex-core Majorana modes are computed from the same Hamiltonian under open boundary conditions. These are internal consistency checks of a stated model, not fits renamed as predictions. The 'universal mechanism' claim depends on the assumption that only nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping is present; whether real nonsymmorphic bilayers have additional symmetry-allowed interlayer terms is a model-realization or correctness concern, not circularity. Self-citations to earlier work by the same group are used to contextualize the band structure but are not load-bearing for the new phase diagram, which is computed here directly. The only by-construction element is the layer-resolved thermal Hall identity, which is explicitly definitional and does not support the core topological phase claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on the BdG Hamiltonian, the layer-resolved Berry-curvature definitions, and the assumption that interlayer coupling is fully captured by the nearest-neighbor form factor. The universality and effective-invariant claims are additional assumptions supported only by the numerics. No new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Fermi level mu = 3.8t
    Chosen so the Fermi surface encloses the M point, placing the gap closing at the zone-boundary momentum where interlayer hopping vanishes.
  • Magnetic exchange field Mz = 0.5t
    Chosen to break time-reversal symmetry while keeping the PT-symmetric limit at Vz=0; sets the phase-boundary scale.
  • Pairing amplitude Delta = 0.3t
    Chosen small relative to the bandwidth so topological transitions occur at M; not fitted to a material.
  • Interlayer hopping eta = 0.5t
    Chosen to show layer-locking survives strong interlayer coupling; mechanism is argued to be independent of its value.
  • Spin-orbit coupling lambda_so = 0.5t
    Chosen to produce the Dirac band structure underlying the phases; affects quantitative Chern values but not the mechanism.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The system is described by the mean-field BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) with s-wave pairing, either intrinsic or proximity-induced.
    Invoked in the Model Hamiltonian section; assumes superconductivity coexists with magnetic order and preserves the nonsymmorphic lattice symmetries.
  • domain assumption Only nearest-neighbor interlayer hopping enters; its form factor cos(kx/2)cos(ky/2) vanishes at the zone boundary.
    Used to derive the vanishing interlayer coupling; longer-range interlayer tunneling is neglected.
  • ad hoc to paper A nearly quantized layer-resolved Chern number, despite not being a true topological invariant, can serve as an effective invariant predicting layer-locked boundary states.
    Introduced in the paragraph after Eq. (3); supported only by numerical evidence for one parameter set.
  • domain assumption The magnetic exchange term Mz tau_z sigma_z s_z represents a PT-symmetric antiferromagnetic order; an external Zeeman field can replace it.
    Used in the experimental discussion; the replacement is not shown to preserve the layer-staggered structure.
  • standard math Standard Berry-curvature formulas for Chern numbers and class-D topological classification apply to the BdG Hamiltonian.
    Background formalism from Refs. [10, 12-14].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Layer-Locked Chiral Topological Superconductivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CMKYZEN

@misc{pith2026260808843,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Layer-Locked Chiral Topological Superconductivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CMKYZEN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08843}
}
read the original abstract

We uncover a universal mechanism for realizing layer-locked topological phases. Guided by it, we investigate the realization of layer-locked chiral topological superconductivity-the superconducting analogue of the quantum anomalous layer Hall effect-in a nonsymmorphic bilayer antiferromagnetic system with s-wave pairing. We identify three distinct gate-tunable topological phases and establish a direct correspondence between the nearly quantized layer-resolved Chern numbers and the layer-locking behavior of chiral Majorana edge states, vortex-core Majorana zero modes, and nearly quantized thermal Hall responses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08843 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematics of the (a) lattice structure and antiferromagnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Total Chern number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Layer-resolved probability density profiles of MZMs un [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Layer-resolved thermal Hall coefficients as functions of tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and the layer-staggered potential(V z = 0), the normal- state band structure of this Hamiltonian exhibits three Dirac points located atX= (π,0),Y= (0, π), andM= (π, π)[62]. Previous studies have shown that this band struc- ture lays the foundation for a diversity of topological super- conducting phases, such as an exotic gapless superconducting phase feat...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and supercon- ductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 076501 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Leijnse and K

    M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Introduction to topological super- conductivity and majorana fermions, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 124003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Tanaka, M

    Y . Tanaka, M. Sato, and N. Nagaosa, Symmetry and topology in superconductors–odd-frequency pairing and edge states–, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.81, 011013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    T. D. Stanescu and S. Tewari, Majorana fermions in semicon- ductor nanowires: fundamentals, modeling, and experiment, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter25, 233201 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Search for majorana fermions in supercon- ductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.4, 113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    S. R. Elliott and M. Franz, Colloquium: Majorana fermions in nuclear, particle, and solid-state physics, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 137 (2015)

    2015

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Sato and S

    M. Sato and S. Fujimoto, Majorana fermions and topology in superconductors, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 072001 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Kallin and J

    C. Kallin and J. Berlinsky, Chiral superconductors, Rep. Prog. Phys.79, 054502 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two di- mensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  4. [12]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral topological superconductor from the quantum hall state, Phys. Rev. B82, 184516 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors, AIP Conf

    A. Kitaev, Periodic table for topological insulators and super- conductors, AIP Conf. Proc.1134, 22 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Topological insulators and superconductors: Tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New J. Phys.12, 065010 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    G. E. V olovik, Fermion zero modes on vortices in chiral super- conductors, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters70, 609 (1999)

    1999

  9. [17]

    D. A. Ivanov, Non-abelian statistics of half-quantum vortices in p-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 268 (2001)

    2001

  10. [18]

    Nomura, S

    K. Nomura, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and N. Nagaosa, Cross- correlated responses of topological superconductors and super- fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 026802 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Shimizu, A

    Y . Shimizu, A. Yamakage, and K. Nomura, Quantum thermal hall effect of majorana fermions on the surface of supercon- ducting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B91, 195139 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    Mo, X.-J

    Y . Mo, X.-J. Wang, Z.-Y . Zhuang, and Z. Yan, Co- existence of chiral majorana edge states and bogoliubov fermi surfaces in two-dimensional nonsymmorphic dirac semimetal/superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B111, L140504 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Karzig, C

    T. Karzig, C. Knapp, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Bonderson, M. B. Hast- 6 ings, C. Nayak, J. Alicea, K. Flensberg, S. Plugge, Y . Oreg, C. M. Marcus, and M. H. Freedman, Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning-protected topological quantum compu- tation with majorana zero modes, Ph...

    2017

  16. [24]

    Marra, Majorana nanowires for topological quantum compu- tation, J

    P. Marra, Majorana nanowires for topological quantum compu- tation, J. Appl. Phys.132, 231101 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Dumitr1escu, C

    E. Dumitr1escu, C. Zhang, D. C. Marinescu, and S. Tewari, Topological thermoelectric effects in spin-orbit coupled electron- and hole-doped semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B85, 245301 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Ngampruetikorn and J

    V . Ngampruetikorn and J. A. Sauls, Impurity-induced anoma- lous thermal hall effect in chiral superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 157002 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    A. M. Black-Schaffer, Edge properties and majorana fermions in the proposed chirald-wave superconducting state of doped graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 197001 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Liu, C.-C

    F. Liu, C.-C. Liu, K. Wu, F. Yang, and Y . Yao,d+id ′ chi- ral superconductivity in bilayer silicene, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 066804 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    W. Qin, L. Li, and Z. Zhang, Chiral topological superconduc- tivity arising from the interplay of geometric phase and electron correlation, Nat. Phys.15, 796 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  23. [31]

    Fujimoto, Topological order and non-abelian statistics in noncentrosymmetrics-wave superconductors, Phys

    S. Fujimoto, Topological order and non-abelian statistics in noncentrosymmetrics-wave superconductors, Phys. Rev. B77, 220501(R) (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    Zhang, S

    C. Zhang, S. Tewari, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma,px+ipy superfluid froms-wave interactions of fermionic cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 160401 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    M. Sato, Y . Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Non-abelian topolog- ical order ins-wave superfluids of ultracold fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 020401 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic new platform for topological quantum computation using semiconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 040502 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor de- vice, Phys

    J. Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor de- vice, Phys. Rev. B81, 125318 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    J. Li, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, A. H. MacDonald, A. Yazdani, and B. A. Bernevig, Two-dimensional chiral topological supercon- ductivity in shiba lattices, Nat. Commun.7, 12297 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    J. Wang, Q. Zhou, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Chiral topologi- cal superconductor and half-integer conductance plateau from quantum anomalous hall plateau transition, Phys. Rev. B92, 064520 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Tokura, K

    Y . Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic topological insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 126 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    G. C. M ´enard, S. Guissart, C. Brun, R. T. Leriche, M. Trif, F. Debontridder, D. Demaille, D. Roditchev, P. Simon, and T. Cren, Two-dimensional topological superconductivity in pb/co/si(111), Nat. Commun.8, 2040 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Palacio-Morales, E

    A. Palacio-Morales, E. Mascot, S. Cocklin, H. Kim, S. Rachel, D. K. Morr, and R. Wiesendanger, Atomic-scale interface engineering of majorana edge modes in a 2d magnet- superconductor hybrid system, Sci. Adv.5, eaav6600 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Kezilebieke, M

    S. Kezilebieke, M. N. Huda, V . Va ˇno, M. Aapro, S. C. Gan- guli, O. J. Silveira, S. Głodzik, A. S. Foster, T. Ojanen, and P. Liljeroth, Topological superconductivity in a van der waals heterostructure, Nature588, 424 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    P. Li, J. Zhang, D. Zhu, C.-Q. Chen, E. Yi, B. Shen, Y . Hou, Z. Yan, D.-X. Yao, D. Guo, and D. Zhong, Observation of in-gap states in a two-dimensional cri2/nbse2 heterostructure, Nano Lett.24, 9468 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Gao, Y .-F

    A. Gao, Y .-F. Liu, C. Hu, J.-X. Qiu, C. Tzschaschel, B. Ghosh, S.-C. Ho, D. B´erub´e, R. Chen, H. Sun, Z. Zhang, X.-Y . Zhang, Y .-X. Wang, N. Wang, Z. Huang, C. Felser, A. Agarwal, T. Ding, H.-J. Tien, A. Akey, J. Gardener, B. Singh, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, K. S. Burch,...

    2021

  36. [44]

    Chen, H.-P

    R. Chen, H.-P. Sun, M. Gu, C.-B. Hua, Q. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Layer hall effect induced by hidden berry curva- ture in antiferromagnetic insulators, Natl. Sci. Rev.11, nwac140 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    W.-B. Dai, H. Li, D.-H. Xu, C.-Z. Chen, and X. C. Xie, Quan- tum anomalous layer Hall effect in the topological magnet MnBi2Te4, Phys. Rev. B106, 245425 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    R. Peng, T. Zhang, Z. He, Q. Wu, Y . Dai, B. Huang, and Y . Ma, Intrinsic layer-polarized anomalous hall effect in bilayer Mnbi2te4, Phys. Rev. B107, 085411 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    H. Xu, X. Li, H. Sang, Y . Zhang, W. Mu, and S. Qi, Layer- polarized anomalous hall effect in the mnbi2te4/in2se3 (in2te3) heterostructures, Materials Today Quantum3, 100012 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    S. Li, M. Gong, S. Cheng, H. Jiang, and X. C. Xie, Dissipation- less layertronics in axion insulator mnbi2te4, Natl. Sci. Rev.11, nwad262 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Zhang, X

    T. Zhang, X. Xu, B. Huang, Y . Dai, L. Kou, and Y . Ma, Layer- polarized anomalous hall effects in valleytronic van der waals bilayers, Mater. Horiz.10, 483 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Zhang, X

    T. Zhang, X. Xu, J. Guo, Y . Dai, and Y . Ma, Layer-polarized anomalous hall effects from inversion-symmetric single-layer lattices, Nano Lett.24, 1009 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Y . Feng, Y . Dai, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y . Ma, Layer hall effect in multiferroic two-dimensional materials, Nano Lett.23, 5367 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    K. Liu, X. Ma, Y . Li, and M. Zhao, Tailoring the quantum anomalous layer hall effect in multiferroic bilayers through slid- ing, npj Computational Materials10, 118 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Y . Tian, X. Kong, C. Jiang, H.-J. Zhang, and W.-J. Gong, Quan- tum Anomalous Layer Hall Effect in Realistic van der Waals Heterobilayers, Nano Letters25, 491 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Z. Gao, L. Chen, J. Chen, Z. Luo, X. Li, Z. Niu, J. Shi, T. Cao, and X. Fan, Ferroelectric control of layer-polarized anoma- lous Hall effects in bilayer and trilayer RuCl2, Materials Today Physics46, 101473 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Y . Liu, Y . Feng, Y . Dai, B. Huang, and Y . Ma, Engineering lay- ertronics in two-dimensional ferromagnetic multiferroic lattice, Nano Lett.24, 3507 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    X. Wang, S. Liu, L. Bai, R.-W. Zhang, Y . Yao, and W. Feng, Layer hall and layer spin hall effects in two-dimensional al- termagnets induced by spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. B112, 134421 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    X. Wang, L. Bai, W. Feng, and Y . Yao, Layer nernst and thermal hall effects in two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 111, 104405 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Qin and R

    F. Qin and R. Chen, Layer hall effect induced by altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. B113, 165418 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    L. L. Tao, Q. Zhang, H. Li, H. J. Zhao, X. Wang, B. Song, E. Y . Tsymbal, and L. Bellaiche, Layer hall detection of the n´eel vec- tor in centrosymmetric magnetoelectric antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096803 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    Yi, C.-B

    X.-X. Yi, C.-B. Hua, R. Chen, and B. Zhou, Disorder-enhanced layer hall effect in a magnetic sandwich heterostructure, Phys. 7 Rev. B109, 115301 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Y . Han, Y . Guo, Z. Li, and Z. Qiao, Layer hall effect without external electric field, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 236206 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    J. Hu, B. Wang, H. Zhou, T. Jia, Z. Sun, C. Liu, B. Zhang, D. Qian, T. Li, X. C. Xie, Y . Kong, C.-Z. Chen, and D. Xiao, Half-quantized layer hall effect as a probe of quantized axion field, Nature Communications17, 1305 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    S. M. Young and C. L. Kane, Dirac Semimetals in Two Dimen- sions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 126803 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Liu, J.-W. Luo, A. J. Freeman, and A. Zunger, Hidden spin polarization in inversion-symmetric bulk crystals, Nature Physics10, 387 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    W. Chen, M. Gu, J. Li, P. Wang, and Q. Liu, Role of Hidden Spin Polarization in Nonreciprocal Transport of Antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 276601 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    Xu, C.-G

    W.-Z. Xu, C.-G. Chu, Z.-C. Pan, J.-J. Chen, A.-Q. Wang, Z.-B. Tan, P.-F. Zhu, X.-G. Ye, D.-P. Yu, and Z.-M. Liao, Proximity- induced superconducting gap in the intrinsic magnetic topolog- ical insulatorMnBi 2Te4, Phys. Rev. B105, 184515 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Mo, X.-J

    Y . Mo, X.-J. Wang, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensionalπ-junction Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 112, 115421 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    S. Qin, C. Fang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu, Topological Supercon- ductivity in an Extendeds-Wave Superconductor and Its Impli- cation to Iron-Based Superconductors, Phys. Rev. X12, 011030 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    Zhang, Z

    Z. Zhang, Z. Wu, C. Fang, F.-c. Zhang, J. Hu, Y . Wang, and S. Qin, Topological superconductivity from unconventional band degeneracy with conventional pairing, Nature Communi- cations15, 7971 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    X.-J. Wang, Y . Mo, Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Intrinsic second-order topological superconductors with tunable majo- rana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B113, 144513 (2026)

    2026

  63. [71]

    Li and R

    Y .-H. Li and R. Cheng, Identifying axion insulator by quantized magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagneticmnbi 2te4 tunnel junction, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L022067 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    S. Li, M. Gong, Y .-H. Li, H. Jiang, and X. C. Xie, High spin axion insulator, Nat. Commun.15, 4250 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    J. C. Y . Teo and C. L. Kane, Topological defects and gap- less modes in insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    T. Qin, Q. Niu, and J. Shi, Energy magnetization and the ther- mal hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 236601 (2011)

    2011

  67. [75]

    Sumiyoshi and S

    H. Sumiyoshi and S. Fujimoto, Quantum thermal hall effect in a time-reversal-symmetry-broken topological superconductor in two dimensions: Approach from bulk calculations, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.82, 023602 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    Z. Wang, L. Dong, C. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Berry curvature effects on quasiparticle dynamics in superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 187001 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    R. Li, X. Zou, Y . Bai, Z. Chen, B. Huang, Y . Dai, and C. Niu, Layer-coupled corner states in two-dimensional topological multiferroics, Materials Horizons11, 2242 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    S. M. Young and B. J. Wieder, Filling-Enforced Magnetic Dirac Semimetals in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 186401 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.